Sequential Adriamycin and CMF in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical activity of a sequential treatment with Adriamycin followed by CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) and the relative therapeutic contribution of the two drug regimens given at full conventional doses in metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1990 to February 1993, 44 patients with advanced breast cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy entered the study. Treatment consisted of the intravenous administration of Adriamycin (75 mg/m² on day 1 every three weeks) for four cycles followed by intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m²; methotrexate, 40 mg/m²; fluorouracil 600 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8 every four weeks for four total courses. RESULTS: In 41 evaluable patients, four cycles of full-dose Adriamycin were able to achieve an overall response rate of 75%, including 17% complete remissions. Four cycles of CMF administered after Adriamycin were able to increase tumor response in 64% of evaluable cases. At the end of the sequential treatment program, 78% of 41 patients achieved an objective remission and in 30% of them a clinical complete response was documented. Main side effects, i.e., leukopenia and gastrointestinal disturbances, were moderate and short-lasting. One patient died because of acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: In untreated metastatic breast cancer patients, the sequential administration of Adriamycin and CMF is highly effective at the expense of a moderate toxicity profile that allows high-dose intensity of both drug regimens. CMF treatment after upfront Adriamycin is able to exert a further therapeutic advantage.

Perspectives on anthracyclines plus ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

Doxorubicin and ifosfamide are currently the two main drugs for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas in adults. Given in combination at full doses, with or without dacarbazine, these agents have induced higher response rates than were obtained with single-agent therapy. Because they involve considerable myelotoxicity, however, full-dose regimens should be reserved for patients with good performance status and without potential septic foci. Obviously, higher response rates do not automatically translate into improved survival. In soft tissue sarcomas, full-dose polychemotherapy will most probably provide a survival benefit only in selected patients in whom surgery can be performed in combination with chemotherapy. Prospective trials in such patients, although difficult to carry out, would be highly desirable. The information they would provide might help the clinician tailor treatment in a more rational way and improve chances of cure or long-term survival in at least some patient subgroups.

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine in association with vinorelbine for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine (G) and vinorelbine (V) have favorable safety profile and antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer. To exploit their different mechanism of action and lack of overlapping toxicity, we performed a phase I and II study of G and V in combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated. In the dose-finding phase, seven cohorts of patients (22 women) received increasing doses to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. Patients recruited in the phase II portion of the study (31 women) received the dose level immediately below the one defined as MTD (i.e., G 1200 mg/m2, V 30 mg/m2, on day 1 and day 8, every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Dose escalation was discontinued at G 1400mg/m2 and V 30 mg/m2 because of toxic death due to thrombocytopenia and CNS hemorrage. No other limiting toxicities were observed, and tolerability was similar at all dose levels studied in the escalation portion of the study. The main toxicity was granulocytopenia of grade 3/4 in 36 and 48% of the patients on phase I and II respectively, without episodes of neutropenic fever. Thrombocytopenia was uncommon. Other side effects were usually mild to moderate. In 46 evaluable patients, the response rate was 24% (complete response 7%, partial response 17%). Disease stabilization was observed in further 17%. The median duration of response was 12 months (range 5-14) and the median survival was 20 months (range 1 to 45+). CONCLUSIONS: G and V, on day 1 and 8 of 3-weekly cycles, can safely be administered to patients with metastatic breast cancer at the dose of 1200 and 30 mg/m2, respectively. The antitumor activity of G and V in combination was similar to that reported when using either drug as single agent.