Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
FASEB J ; 34(1): 1710-1727, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31914660

RESUMEN

Despite the importance of the tumor microenvironment in regulating tumor progression, few in vitro models have been developed to understand the effects of non-neoplastic cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) on drug resistance in glioblastoma (GBM) cells. Using CellTrace-labeled human GBM and microglial (MG) cells, we established a 2D co-culture including various ratios of the two cell types. Viability, proliferation, migration, and drug response assays were carried out to assess the role of MG. A 3D model was then established using a hyaluronic acid-gelatin hydrogel to culture a mixture of GBM and MG and evaluate drug resistance. A contact co-culture of fluorescently labeled GBM and MG demonstrated that MG cells modestly promoted tumor cell proliferation (17%-30% increase) and greater migration of GBM cells (>1.5-fold increase). Notably, the presence of MG elicited drug resistance even when in a low ratio (10%-20%) relative to co-cultured tumor cells. The protective effect of MG on GBM was greater in the 3D model (>100% survival of GBM when challenged with cytotoxics). This new 3D human model demonstrated the influence of non-neoplastic cells and matrix on chemoresistance of GBM cells to three agents with different mechanisms of action suggesting that such sophisticated in vitro approaches may facilitate improved preclinical testing.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Movimiento Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Citotoxinas/farmacología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Microglía/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Técnicas de Cocultivo/métodos , Matriz Extracelular/efectos de los fármacos , Matriz Extracelular/patología , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/farmacología , Hidrogeles/farmacología , Masculino , Microglía/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Microambiente Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Cells ; 10(2)2021 02 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33562819

RESUMEN

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive cancer among primary brain tumours. As with other cancers, the incidence of glioblastoma is increasing; despite modern therapies, the overall mean survival of patients post-diagnosis averages around 16 months, a figure that has not changed in many years. Cannabigerol (CBG) has only recently been reported to prevent the progression of certain carcinomas and has not yet been studied in glioblastoma. Here, we have compared the cytotoxic, apoptotic, and anti-invasive effects of the purified natural cannabinoid CBG together with CBD and THC on established differentiated glioblastoma tumour cells and glioblastoma stem cells. CBG and THC reduced the viability of both types of cells to a similar extent, whereas combining CBD with CBG was more efficient than with THC. CBD and CBG, both alone and in combination, induced caspase-dependent cell apoptosis, and there was no additive THC effect. Of note, CBG inhibited glioblastoma invasion in a similar manner to CBD and the chemotherapeutic temozolomide. We have demonstrated that THC has little added value in combined-cannabinoid glioblastoma treatment, suggesting that this psychotropic cannabinoid should be replaced with CBG in future clinical studies of glioblastoma therapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cannabinoides/uso terapéutico , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Apoptosis , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Cannabinoides/farmacología , Femenino , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA