RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The childhood bladder and bowel dysfunction questionnaire (CBBDQ) was previously found feasible, structurally valid, with good internal consistency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the remaining measurement properties according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). METHODS: A prospective cohort study among parents of children aged 5-12 years was conducted. Calculated were the area under the curve (AUC) (criterion validity, responsiveness, interpretability) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCagreement ) (construct validity and test-retest reliability). RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two parents were included from March 2019 to April 2021. Correlating the bladder subscales of the CBBDQ with the Vancouver symptom score for dysfunctional elimination (VSSDES) and proxy-reported pediatric incontinence quality of life (p-PinQ) showed convergent validity (ICCsagreement : 0.76 and 0.74). Divergent validity was found when correlating the bowel subscales of the CBBDQ with the VSSDES (ICCagreement : 0.52). Excellent criterion validity (AUC: 0.98); excellent test-retest reliability (ICCagreement : 0.94) and, at 6 months, fair responsiveness (AUC: 0.74) were found. The minimal important change was 4.5, with cut-off value of 11. CONCLUSION: The CBBDQ has been developed according to COSMIN standards. The items were defined using the consensus-based ICCS standards and Rome-III criteria. The measurement properties were identified using enough participants. Although interpretability is not considered a measurement property, interpretability aspects are reported here as they refer to what instrument scores mean. The 18-item-CBBDQ met the measurement properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness, as defined by COSMIN. The CBBDQ is suitable for self-administration by parents, and completion takes little time.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Intestinales , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Niño , Vejiga Urinaria , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , PsicometríaRESUMEN
Objective: To identify patients at high risk of delayed in-hospital functional recovery after knee replacement surgery by developing and validating a prediction model, including a combination of preoperative physical fitness parameters and patient characteristics. Design: Retrospective cohort study using binary logistic regression. Setting: University hospital, orthopedic department. Participants: 260 adults (N=260) (≥18y) with knee osteoarthritis awaiting primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty and assessed during usual care between 2016 and 2020. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Time to reach in-hospital functional independence (in days), measured by the modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale. A score of 0 means completely independent. Potential predictor variables are a combination of preoperative physical fitness parameters and patient characteristics. Results: Binary logistic regression modeling was applied to develop the initial model. A low de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI), walking aid use indoors, and a low handgrip strength (HGS) were the most important predictors of delayed in-hospital recovery. This model was internally validated and had an optimism-corrected R2 of 0.07 and an area under curve of 61.2%. The probability of a high risk of delayed in-hospital recovery is expressed by the following equation:Phighrisk=(1/(1+e(-(2.638-0.193×DEMMI+0.879×indoorwalkingaid-0.007×HGS))))×100%. Conclusions: The model has a low predictive value and a poor discriminative ability. However, there is a positive association between preoperative physical fitness and postoperative recovery of physical function. The validity of our model to distinguish between high and low risk, based on preoperative fitness values and patient characteristics, is limited.
RESUMEN
Background: The effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) compared to posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients with single-level spondylolisthesis has not been substantiated. To address the evidence gap, a well-powered randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing the effectiveness of TLIF with PLIF, entitled the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT), was conducted. Methods: In a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial among five Dutch hospitals, 161 patients were randomly allocated to either TLIF or PLIF (1:1), stratified according to study site. Patients and statisticians were blinded for group assignment. All patients were over 18 years old with symptomatic single-level degenerative, isthmic or iatrogenic lumbar spondylolisthesis, and eligible for lumbar interbody fusion surgery through a posterior approach. The primary outcome was change in disability measured with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from preoperative to one year postoperative. The non-inferiority limit was set to 7.0 points based on the MCID of ODI. Secondary outcomes were change in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) assessed with EuroQol 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), as well as back and leg pain (Numerical rating scale, NRS), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; HADS), perioperative blood loss, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, and complications. Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Registry, number 5722 (registration date March 30, 2016), Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT): A randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Findings: Patients were included between August 2017 and November 2020. The total study population was 161 patients. Total loss-to-follow-up after one year was 16 patients. Per-protocol analysis included 66 patients in each group. In the TLIF group (mean age 61.6, 36 females), ODI improved from 46.7 to 20.7, whereas in the PLIF group (mean age 61.9, 41 females), it improved from 46.0 to 24.9. This difference (-4.9, 90% CI -12.2 to +2.4) did not reach the non-inferiority limit of 7.0 points in ODI. A significant difference in the secondary outcome measurement, QALY (SF-36), was observed in favor of TLIF (P < 0.05). However, this was not clinically relevant. No difference was found for all other secondary outcome measurements; PROMs (EQ-5D, NRS leg/back, HADS), perioperative blood loss, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, and perioperative and postoperative complications. Interpretation: For patients with single-level spondylolisthesis, TLIF is non-inferior to PLIF in terms of clinical effectiveness. Disability (measured with ODI) did not differ over time between groups. Funding: No funding was received for this trial.
RESUMEN
SUMMARY: Head and cervical spine movements cause narrowing or widening of neuroforamina. In healthy individuals these movements do not cause symptoms of radiculopathy. This implies a compensating volume-regulating mechanism of the neuroforamina. Such a mechanism has been postulated in the years before CT and MRI for the neuroforaminal veins. Dural sac indentations with emptying and refilling of the internal vertebral venous plexus (IVVP) were postulated in the lumbar region using myelography. Emptying of the IVVP occurs in the lumbar spine when moving towards maximal extension and refilling while moving towards maximal flexion. Such indentations have not been shown in the cervical region. With MRI this mechanism has been demonstrated during axial rotation in the C1-C2 segment. It consists of emptying and refilling of the IVVP and thus prevents dural sac compression. During spinal surgery, the IVVP and connecting neuroforaminal veins may be damaged. Because the clinical implications of dysfunction of this protecting mechanism of the IVVP and its neuroforaminal venous connections are not clear, the consequences of such damage are unknown. Therefore, these venous structures should be examined by studying the cervical spine in supine position and, if possible, in different postures (flexion, extension and axial rotation) using MRI with contrast-enhancement and fat suppression. These images may be a basis for future advancement of clinical care.
Los movimientos de la cabeza y la columna cervical provocan un estrechamiento o ensanchamiento de las neuroforaminas. En individuos sanos estos movimientos no causan síntomas de radiculopatía. Esto implica un mecanismo compensador de regulación del volumen de las neuroforaminas. Este mecanismo se ha postulado en los años anteriores a la TC y la RM para las venas neuroforaminales. Mediante mielografía se postularon hendiduras del saco dural con vaciado y llenado del plexo venoso vertebral interno (PVVI) en la región lumbar. El vaciado del PVVI se produce en la columna lumbar cuando se mueve hacia la máxima extensión y se rellena mientras se mueve hacia la máxima flexión. En la región cervical no se han observado tales depresiones. Con resonancia magnética se ha demostrado este mecanismo durante la rotación axial en el segmento C1-C2. Consiste en vaciar y rellenar la PVVI y así evitar la compresión del saco dural. Durante la cirugía de columna, la PVVI y las venas neuroforaminales que las conectan pueden dañarse. Debido a que las implicaciones clínicas de la disfunción de este mecanismo protector de la PVVI y sus conexiones venosas neuroforaminales no están claras, se desconocen las consecuencias de dicho daño. Por tanto, estas estructuras venosas deben examinarse estudiando la columna cervical en decúbito supino y, si es posible, en diferentes posturas (flexión, extensión y rotación axial) mediante resonancia magnética con contraste y supresión grasa. Estas imágenes pueden ser una base para futuros avances de la atención clínica.