RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Self-regulation theory explains how patients' illness perceptions influence self-management behaviour (e.g. via adherence to treatment). Following these assumptions, we explored whether illness perceptions of ESRD-patients are related to mortality rates. METHODS: Illness perceptions of 182 patients participating in the NECOSAD-2 study in the period between December 2004 and June 2005 were assessed. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate whether subsequent all-cause mortality could be attributed to illness perception dimensions. RESULTS: One-third of the participants had died at the end of the follow-up. Mortality rates were higher among patients who believed that their treatment was less effective in controlling their disease (perceived treatment control; RR = 0.71, P = 0.028). This effect remained stable after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables (RR = 0.65, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: If we consider risk factors for mortality, we tend to rely on clinical parameters rather than on patients' representations of their illness. Nevertheless, results from the current exploration may suggest that addressing patients' personal beliefs regarding the effectiveness of treatment can provide a powerful tool for predicting and perhaps even enhancing survival.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Considerable geographic variation exists in the relative use of hemodialysis (HD) vs peritoneal dialysis (PD). Studies comparing survival between these modalities have yielded conflicting results. Our aim was to compare the survival of Dutch HD and PD patients. We developed Cox regression models using 16 643 patients from the Dutch End-Stage Renal Disease Registry (RENINE) adjusting for age, gender, primary renal disease, center of dialysis, year of start of renal replacement therapy, and included several interaction terms. We assumed definite treatment assignment at day 91 and performed an intention-to-treat analysis, censoring for transplantation. To account for time dependency, we stratified the analysis into three time periods, >3-6, >6-15, and >15 months. For the first period, the mortality hazard ratio (HR) of PD compared with HD patients was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.41) for 40-year-old non-diabetics, which increased with age and presence of diabetes to 0.95 (95% CI 0.64-1.39) for 70-year-old patients with diabetes as primary renal disease. The HRs of the second period were generally higher. After 15 months, the HR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.74-1.00) for 40-year-old non-diabetics and 1.42 (95% CI 1.23-1.65) for 70-year-old patients with diabetes as primary renal disease. We conclude that the survival advantage for Dutch PD compared with HD patients decreases over time, with age and in the presence of diabetes as primary disease.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diálisis Peritoneal/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to investigate the risk of end-stage diabetic nephropathy due to Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in Indo-Asian immigrants from Surinam. METHODS: A demographically based case-control study was carried out in Surinamese Indo-Asian immigrants and Dutch Caucasian subjects. All patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy who had started dialysis between 1990 and 1998 were identified through a national registry of all patients entering a renal replacement program in the Netherlands. The general population of native Dutch and Surinamese Indo-Asians were considered the control subjects. RESULTS: Among Indo-Asian immigrants, the age adjusted relative risk of end-stage diabetic nephropathy was 38 (95 % CI 16 to 91) compared with the native Dutch population. The duration of diabetes until the start of dialysis treatment was similar in both ethnic groups, about 17 years. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: The Indo-Asian subjects had a nearly 40-fold increase in the risk for end-stage diabetic nephropathy due to Type II diabetes, compared with the native Dutch population. This was higher than expected on the basis of the eightfold higher prevalence of diabetes in the Indo-Asian population. The similar duration of diabetes until the start of dialysis treatment in both ethnic groups supports the hypothesis of a higher incidence of diabetic nephropathy in the Indo-Asian diabetic population. Early and frequent screening for diabetes and microalbuminuria is recommended in Indo-Asian subjects.