Patients' representations of their end-stage renal disease: relation with mortality.

BACKGROUND: Self-regulation theory explains how patients' illness perceptions influence self-management behaviour (e.g. via adherence to treatment). Following these assumptions, we explored whether illness perceptions of ESRD-patients are related to mortality rates. METHODS: Illness perceptions of 182 patients participating in the NECOSAD-2 study in the period between December 2004 and June 2005 were assessed. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate whether subsequent all-cause mortality could be attributed to illness perception dimensions. RESULTS: One-third of the participants had died at the end of the follow-up. Mortality rates were higher among patients who believed that their treatment was less effective in controlling their disease (perceived treatment control; RR = 0.71, P = 0.028). This effect remained stable after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables (RR = 0.65, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: If we consider risk factors for mortality, we tend to rely on clinical parameters rather than on patients' representations of their illness. Nevertheless, results from the current exploration may suggest that addressing patients' personal beliefs regarding the effectiveness of treatment can provide a powerful tool for predicting and perhaps even enhancing survival.

The truth on current peritoneal dialysis: state of the art.

The share of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the spectrum of chronic dialysis has decreased markedly in the Netherlands in the last 15 years. Consequently, the knowledge of nephrologists and nursing staff on PD has declined leading to a negative spiral in which loss of experience resulted in loss of enthusiasm to offer PD to patients and also in less interest in the new PD developments. All these changes took place while the results of PD improved and patient survival was at least similar to that on haemodialysis. The aim of this review is first to give a summary of the principles and practice of patient and staff education and to describe the role of the medical contribution in decision-making. On this basis, the second aim is to update internist-nephrologists on a number of issues that have been underexposed in the past. Recent patient and technique survival data of PD patients is reviewed, and also the new insights into dialysis adequacy. The presence of residual renal function is the main determinant of patient survival together with prevention of overhydration. Urea and creatinine removal are not important at all when patients are still passing urine. Many early problems with PD are due to the peritoneal catheter and suggestions are made for improvement of its function. The prevention and management of infections is reviewed, and also the regular assessment of peritoneal function. Free water transport is a predictor of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS), which should be assessed regularly. The pathogenesis of EPS, treatment and the decreasing incidence are discussed.

Peritoneal dialysis underscores its merits in portal hypertensionrelated and nephrogenic ascites.

In the Western world, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is less frequently applied as substitute therapy in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In the Netherlands the use of PD has decreased from 30.3 to 13.5% due to several factors, but not due to lower PD-related outcome. The lower penetrance of PD diminishes experience with and exposure of young professionals to this treatment modality. This does not enhance a free and motivated choice among renal replacement therapies for patients who cannot be transplanted pre-emptively. To rejuvenate interest in PD and to underscore its merits, we would like to share the use of PD on two extraordinary occasions, where PD was the only way out. Ascites due to portal hypertension with profound gastrointestinal haemorrhage and nephrogenic ascites poses major management challenges in ESRD patients. In conclusion, PD came to the rescue and tremendously increased quality of life in the patients presented. To be readily available, a certain penetrance of and expertise in PD as renal replacement therapy is warranted.

Hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD): latent overhydration in PD patients?

Data on the difference in fluid status between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are scarce. Bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA) is able to detect total body water (TBW) and its distribution in intracellular (ICW) and extracellular water (ECW). Echographic determination of the diameter of the inferior caval vein (VCD) provides information about the intravascular space (IVS). Nineteen PD-patients and 20 HD-patients in stable clinical condition were studied. In HD-patients a significant decrease in VCD, mean arterial pressure (MAP), TBW and ECW was noted due to ultrafiltration. Both ratios of VCD to ICW/ECW and of VCD to ECW/TBW decreased. No significant differences were found in these variables between PD-patients and HD-patients before HD. In both patient groups the measured variables pointed towards overhydration and the increased ratios both of VCD to ICW/ECW and VCD to ECW/TBW towards the storage of surplus of fluid in the intravascular space. It can be concluded that both PD-patients and HD-patients before HD have a surplus of fluid in the extracellular compartment, predominantly stored in the intravascular space.