RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The integration of computed tomography (CT)-derived left ventricular outflow tract area into the echocardiography-derived continuity equation results in the reclassification of a significant proportion of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) into moderate AS based on aortic valve area indexed to body surface area determined by fusion imaging (fusion AVAi). The aim of this study was to evaluate AS severity by a fusion imaging technique in patients with low-gradient AS and to compare the clinical impact of reclassified moderate AS versus severe AS. METHODS: We included 359 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation for low-gradient, severe AS at two academic institutions and created a joint database. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and rehospitalisations for heart failure at 1 year. RESULTS: Overall, 35% of the population (nâ¯= 126) were reclassified to moderate AS [median fusion AVAi 0.70 (interquartile range, IQR 0.65-0.80)â¯cm2/m2] and severe AS was retained as the classification in 65% [median fusion AVAi 0.49 (IQR 0.43-0.54) cm2/m2]. Lower body mass index, higher logistic EuroSCORE and larger aortic dimensions characterised patients reclassified to moderate AS. Overall, 57% of patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. Clinical outcome was similar in patients with reclassified moderate or severe AS. Among patients reclassified to moderate AS, non-cardiac mortality was higher in those with LVEF <50% than in those with LVEF ≥50% (log-rank pâ¯= 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of CT and transthoracic echocardiography to obtain fusion AVAi led to the reclassification of one third of patients with low-gradient AS to moderate AS. Reclassification did not affect clinical outcome, although patients reclassified to moderate AS with a LVEF <50% had worse outcomes owing to excess non-cardiac mortality.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare early clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with three consecutive generations of self-expanding valves (SEVs). METHODS: Clinical endpoints of consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with CoreValve, Evolut R or Evolut PRO were included in a prospective database. RESULTS: TAVI was performed with CoreValve (nâ¯= 116), Evolut R (nâ¯= 160) or Evolut PRO (nâ¯= 92). Evolut R and Evolut PRO showed a tendency towards lower permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rates compared to CoreValve (CoreValve 27% vs Evolut R 16% vs Evolut PRO 18%, pâ¯= 0.091). By multivariable regression analysis CoreValve had a significantly higher risk for PPI (odds ratio (OR) 2.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-5.94, pâ¯= 0.008) compared to Evolut R, while Evolut R and PRO were similar. Severe paravalvular leakage (PVL) occurred only with CoreValve, but no significant difference was observed in moderate PVL (10% vs 8% vs 6%, pâ¯= 0.49). CoreValve had a tendency towards a higher risk for more-than-mild PVL as compared with the Evolut platform (Râ¯+ PRO) (OR 2.46, 95% CI 0.98-6.16, pâ¯= 0.055). No significant differences in all-cause mortality (7% vs 4% vs 1%, pâ¯= 0.10), stroke (6% vs 3% vs 2%, pâ¯= 0.21) or major vascular complications (10% vs 12% vs 4%, pâ¯= 0.14) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI with self-expanding valves was safe, and device iterations may result in a lower need for PPI. More-than-mild PVL seemed to occur less often with repositionable technology.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has matured to the treatment of choice for most patients with aortic stenosis (AS). We sought to identify trends in patient and procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes in all patients who underwent TAVI between 2005 and 2020. METHODS: A single-centre analysis was performed on 1500 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, divided into three tertiles (T) of 500 patients treated between November 2005 and December 2014 (T1), January 2015 and May 2018 (T2) and June 2018 and April 2020 (T3). RESULTS: Over time, mean age and gender did not change (T1 to T3: 80, 80 and 79 years and 53%, 55% and 52% men, respectively), while the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score declined (T1: 4.5% to T3: 2.7%, pâ¯< 0.001). Use of general anaesthesia also declined over time (100%, 24% and 1% from T1 to T3) and transfemoral TAVI remained the default approach (87%, 94% and 92%). Median procedure time and contrast volume decreased significantly (186, 114 and 56â¯min and 120, 100 and 80â¯ml, respectively). Thirty-day mortality (7%, 4% and 2%), stroke (7%, 3% and 3%), need for a pacemaker (19%, 22% and 8%) and delirium (17%, 12% and 8%) improved significantly, while major bleeding/vascular complications did not change (both approximately 9%, 6% and 6%). One-year survival was 80%, 88% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Over our 15 years' experience, patient age remained unchanged but the patient risk profile became more favourable. Simplification of the TAVI procedure occurred in parallel with major improvement in outcomes and survival. Bleeding/vascular complications and the need for pacemaker implantation remain the Achilles' heel of TAVI.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) can be subclassified based on its proportionality relative to left ventricular function and end-diastolic volume. FMR proportionality could help identify responders to transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (MitraClip) in terms of residual FMR and/or clinical improvement. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective cohort study evaluated the feasibility of determining FMR proportionality in symptomatic heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular function who were treated with MitraClip forâ¯≥ moderate-to-severe FMR. Baseline proportionate (pFMR) and disproportionate FMR (dFMR) were distinguished. Patient characteristics and MitraClip procedural outcomes were described. RESULTS: From an overall cohort of 81 eligible FMR patients, 23/81 (28%) had to be excluded due to missing transthoracic echocardiogram parameters, 22/81 were excluded based on FMR severity. The remaining cohort, of 36/81 patients (44%), could be classified into dFMR (nâ¯= 26) or pFMR (nâ¯= 10). Conduction disorders were numerically increased in dFMR. All cases requiring >â¯2 clips were in the dFMR group and absence of FMR reduction occurred more frequently with dFMR. POINT OF VIEW/CONCLUSION: Important limitations in terms of imaging acquisition affect the translation of the FMR proportionality concept to a real-world data set. We did observe different demographic and FMR response patterns in patients with proportionate and disproportionate FMR that warrant further investigation.
RESUMEN
This paper describes the history of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) from its preclinical phase during which visionary pioneers developed its concept and prototype valves against strong head wind to first application in clinical practice (2002) and the clinical and scientific role of an early believer and adopter, the Netherlands (2005).
RESUMEN
The current paper presents a position statement of the Dutch Working Group of Transcatheter Heart Valve Interventions that describes which patients with aortic stenosis should be considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation and how this treatment proposal/decision should be made. Given the complexity of the disease and the assessment of its severity, in particular in combination with the continuous emergence of new clinical insights and evidence from physiological and randomised clinical studies plus the introduction of novel innovative treatment modalities, the gatekeeper of the treatment proposal/decision and, thus, of qualification for cost reimbursement is the heart team, which consists of dedicated professionals working in specialised centres.
RESUMEN
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is increasingly used to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at increased risk for surgical aortic valve replacement and is projected to be the preferred treatment modality. As patient selection and operator experience have improved, it is hypothesised that device-host interactions will play a more dominant role in outcome. This, in combination with the increasing number of valve types and sizes, confronts the physician with the dilemma to choose the valve that best fits the individual patient. This necessitates the availability of pre-procedural computer simulation that is based upon the integration of the patient-specific anatomy, the physical and (bio)mechanical properties of the valve and recipient anatomy derived from in-vitro experiments. The objective of this paper is to present such a model and illustrate its potential clinical utility via a few case studies.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess current antithrombotic treatment strategies in the Netherlands in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: For every Dutch hospital performing TAVI (n = 14) an interventional cardiologist experienced in performing TAVI was interviewed concerning heparin, aspirin, thienopyridine and oral anticoagulation treatment in patients undergoing TAVI. RESULTS: The response rate was 100 %. In every centre, a protocol for antithrombotic treatment after TAVI was available. Aspirin was prescribed in all centres, concomitant clopidogrel was prescribed 13 of the 14 centres. Duration of concomitant clopidogrel was 3 months in over two-thirds of cases. In 2 centres, duration of concomitant clopidogrel was based upon type of prosthesis: 6 months versus 3 months for supra-annular and intra-annular prostheses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Leaning on a small basis of evidence and recommendations, the antithrombotic policy for patients undergoing TAVI is highly variable in the Netherlands. As a standardised regimen might further reduce haemorrhagic complications, large randomised clinical trials may help to establish the most appropriate approach.
RESUMEN
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) implies the introduction, positioning, and deployment of a stented bioprosthesis in the (calcified) native aortic valve. We report an at first glance uneventful TAVI with the Medtronic Corevalve System, which was followed by transient electrocardiographic changes suggesting acute left main stem disease. The diagnosis of acute left main stem dissection extending from the left coronary cusp was firmly established by intravascular ultrasound. The ostium of the left main stem was successfully treated with intravascular ultrasound-guided placement of a drug eluting stent.
Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica/terapia , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Aneurisma Coronario/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Aneurisma Coronario/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Coronario/etiología , Angiografía Coronaria , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Humanos , Diseño de Prótesis , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The predictive performance of the models FRANCE-2 and ACC-TAVI for early-mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) can decline over time and can be enhanced by updating them on new populations. We aim to update and internally and temporally validate these models using a recent TAVI-cohort from the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR). METHODS: We used data of TAVI-patients treated in 2013-2017. For each original-model, the best update-method (model-intercept, model-recalibration, or model-revision) was selected by a closed-testing procedure. We internally validated both updated models with 1000 bootstrap samples. We also updated the models on the 2013-2016 dataset and temporally validated them on the 2017-dataset. Performance measures were the Area-Under ROC-curve (AU-ROC), Brier-score, and calibration graphs. RESULTS: We included 6177 TAVI-patients, with 4.5% observed early-mortality. The selected update-method for FRANCE-2 was model-intercept-update. Internal validation showed an AU-ROC of 0.63 (95%CI 0.62-0.66) and Brier-score of 0.04 (0.04-0.05). Calibration graphs show that it overestimates early-mortality. In temporal-validation, the AU-ROC was 0.61 (0.53-0.67).The selected update-method for ACC-TAVI was model-revision. In internal-validation, the AU-ROC was 0.63 (0.63-0.66) and Brier-score was 0.04 (0.04-0.05). The updated ACC-TAVI calibrates well up to a probability of 20%, and subsequently underestimates early-mortality. In temporal-validation the AU-ROC was 0.65 (0.58-0.72). CONCLUSION: Internal-validation of the updated models FRANCE-2 and ACC-TAVI with data from the NHR demonstrated improved performance, which was better than in external-validation studies and comparable to the original studies. In temporal-validation, ACC-TAVI outperformed FRANCE-2 because it suffered less from changes over time.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Emotional distress has been related to clinical events in patients with coronary artery disease, but the influence of positive affect (i.e. mood states such as activity, joy and cheerfulness) has received little attention. Therefore, we wanted to investigate the role of positive affect on clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation in these patients. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. At baseline, patients from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry completed measures of positive affect, depression and anxiety post-PCI. Patients with reduced positive affect scored 1 SD below the mean score. SETTING: University Hospital; Thoraxcenter of the Department of Cardiology. SUBJECTS: 874 patients (72% men; 62.2 +/- 10.9 years) from the RESEARCH registry. Main outcome measure. Death or myocardial infarction (MI) 2 years post-PCI. RESULTS: At follow-up, there were 52 clinical events (deaths n = 27, MIs n = 25). Reduced positive affect and depression/anxiety were associated with poor prognosis, but reduced positive affect was the only independent predictor of events. The incidence of death/MI in adequate versus reduced positive affect patients was 4% (29/663) vs. 11% (23/211); HR = 2.55 (95% CI 1.46-4.34, P = 0.001), adjusting for clinical variables. Reduced positive affect and diabetes were independent prognostic factors, and patients with one (HR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.58-5.10) or both (HR = 5.61, 95% CI 2.25-13.99) of these factors had a higher risk when compared with nondiabetic patients with adequate positive affect, P < or = 0.003. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced positive affect independently predicted death/MI following stent implantation, and improved risk stratification above and beyond diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/psicología , Reestenosis Coronaria/psicología , Emociones , Infarto del Miocardio/psicología , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Reestenosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sirolimus/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a congenital heart defect in which the ductus arteriosus, a vascular structure between the pulmonary artery and the aorta that normally closes shortly after birth, remains open. We present two cases of adults with PDA. A 28-year-old lady had a small PDA without any symptoms or left heart overload. The PDA was closed for endocarditis prevention using a coil. In a 37-year-old lady with palpitations, collapse, dyspnoea and left heart overload caused by a large PDA, percutaneous closure of the PDA was performed with an Amplatzer device. Transcatheter closure has been established to be the method of choice for treating a PDA in adults. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:255-9.).
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Together with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants are vital to improve outcomes in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Challenges lie in finding the optimal balance between the risk of bleeding and preventing thrombotic complications such as reinfarction or stent thrombosis. During the last decade, bivalirudin was introduced as a valid alternative to heparin for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Several trials have been conducted to identify the agent with the best antithrombotic results at the lowest bleeding complication rate. In a rapidly evolving field with changes in vascular access, available P2Y12 inhibitors, and indications for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration, conflicting evidence became available. AREAS COVERED: This paper mainly focuses on the evidence above and gives brief discussion to the recent literature on anticoagulation in fibrinolytic therapy and advances in antiplatelet therapy. EXPERT OPINION: To date, no robust evidence is available challenging unfractionated heparin as the primary choice for anticoagulation in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Further research should include efforts to refine anticoagulation strategies on an individual patient level. For patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, bivalirudin could be used as an alternative to unfractionated heparin, while enoxaparin or fondaparinux is an alternative agent for patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hirudinas , Humanos , Fragmentos de Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Trombosis/prevención & control , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: Despite agreement on the need for screening for the presence of cardiovascular risk factors in first-degree family members of patients with premature coronary artery disease (CAD), this is not routinely carried out in relatives of normocholesterolaemic patients. We evaluated cardiovascular risk factors in family members of normocholesterolaemic patients with premature CAD. METHODS: Eligible index subjects were patients with premature CAD (<55 years in men and <65 years in women), who had undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Patients with fasting total cholesterol levels >6.5 mmol/l were excluded. Sixteen index subjects were included with a mean age of 49±8 years and total cholesterol levels of 5.5±0.8 mmol/l. Sixty-four first-degree relatives from these 16 pedigrees were screened, namely 18 children, 42 siblings and four parents. National Cholesterol Education Program III guidelines were used to identify candidates for lipid-lowering treatment. Furthermore, the presence of four additional metabolic disorders was investigated: the metabolic syndrome, increased levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), hyperhomocysteinaemia and postprandial hyperlipidaemia. RESULTS: Of 64 relatives free of CAD, 34 subjects (53%) fulfilled the criteria to receive therapeutic advice, 20 of whom (31% of the relatives) were candidates for drug therapy. Sixty-one relatives were available for a full assessment of metabolic disorders and in 37 relatives (61%) at least one metabolic abnormality was present. Twelve subjects had hyper-Lp(a), seven subjects had postprandial hyperlipidaemia and two had the metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, 16 subjects had a combination of at least two out of four metabolic disorders. CONCLUSION: Careful evaluation of coronary risk factors and metabolic variables in first-degree relatives of normocholesterolaemic CAD patients identifies a significant number of subjects at increased coronary risk in whom primary prevention measures should be initiated.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate one-year outcomes after implantation of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared to stable angina patients. BACKGROUND: Robust data on the outcome of BVS in the setting of ACS is still scarce. METHODS: Two investigator initiated, single-center, single-arm BVS registries have been pooled for the purpose of this study, namely the BVS Expand and BVS STEMI registries. RESULTS: From September 2012-October 2014, 351 patients with a total of 428 lesions were enrolled. 255 (72.6%) were ACS patients and 99 (27.4%) presented with stable angina/silent ischemia. Mean number of scaffold/patient was 1.55±0.91 in ACS group versus 1.91±1.11 in non-ACS group (P=0.11). Pre- and post-dilatation were performed less frequent in ACS patients, 75.7% and 41.3% versus 89.0% and 62.0% respectively (P=0.05 and P=0.001). Interestingly, post-procedural acute lumen gain and percentage diameter stenosis were superior in ACS patients, 1.62±0.65mm (versus 1.22±0.49mm, P<0.001) and 15.51±8.47% (versus 18.46±9.54%, P=0.04). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate at 12months was 5.5% in the ACS group (versus 5.3% in stable group, P=0.90). One-year definite scaffold thrombosis rate was comparable: 2.0% for ACS population versus 2.1% for stable population (P=0.94), however, early scaffold thromboses occurred only in ACS patients. CONCLUSIONS: One-year clinical outcomes in ACS patients treated with BVS were similar to non-ACS patients. Acute angiographic outcomes were better in ACS than in non-ACS, yet the early thrombotic events require attention and further research.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Sistema de Registros , Andamios del Tejido , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observational studies in selected patients have shown remarkably low restenosis rates after ultrasound-guided stent implantation. However, it is unknown whether this implantation strategy improves long-term angiographic and clinical outcome in routine clinical practice. Methods and Results-- A total of 550 patients with a symptomatic coronary lesion or silent ischemia were randomly assigned to either ultrasound-guided or angiography-guided implantation of =2 tubular stents. The primary end points were angiographic dichotomous restenosis rate, minimal lumen diameter, and percent diameter stenosis after 6 months as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary end points were the occurrence rates of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, and repeat percutaneous intervention) after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. At 6 months, repeat angiography revealed no significant differences between the groups with ultrasound- or angiography-guided stent implantation with respect to dichotomous restenosis rate (24.5% versus 22.8%, P=0.68), minimal lumen diameter (1.95+/-0.72 mm versus 1.91+/-0.68 mm, P=0.52), and percent diameter stenosis (34.8+/-20.6% versus 36.8+/-19.6%, P=0.29), respectively. At 12 months, neither major adverse cardiac events (relative risk, 1.07; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.52; P=0.71) nor repeat percutaneous interventions (relative risk 1.04; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.67; P=0.87) were reduced in the ultrasound-guided group. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not support the routine use of ultrasound guidance for coronary stenting. Angiography-guided optimization of tubular stents can be performed with comparable angiographic and clinical long-term results.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/cirugía , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/prevención & control , Ultrasonografía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of cardiopulmonary bypass during coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has been associated with substantial morbidity. The recent introduction of cardiac stabilizers facilitates CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG), but it is unknown whether cardiac outcome after off-pump surgery is similar to that for the on-pump procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a multicenter trial, 281 patients (mean age 61 years, SD 9 years) were randomly assigned to off-pump or on-pump CABG. In-hospital results and cardiac outcome and quality of life after 1 month are presented. Cardiac outcome was defined as survival free of stroke, myocardial infarction, and coronary reintervention. The mean numbers of distal anastomoses per patient were 2.4 (SD 1.0) and 2.6 (SD 1.1) in the off-pump and on-pump groups, respectively. Completeness of revascularization was similar in both groups. Blood products were needed during 3% of the off-pump procedures and 13% of the on-pump procedures (P<0.01). Release of creatine kinase muscle-brain isoenzyme was 41% less in the off-pump group (P<0.01). Otherwise, no differences in complications were found postoperatively. Off-pump patients were discharged 1 day earlier. At 1 month, operative mortality was zero in both groups, and quality of life had improved similarly. In both groups, 4% of the patients had recurrent angina. The proportions of patients surviving free of cardiovascular events were 93.0% in the off-pump group and 94.2% in the on-pump group (P=0.66). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, off-pump CABG is safe and yields a short-term cardiac outcome comparable to that of on-pump CABG.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Circulación Extracorporea/instrumentación , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Circulación Extracorporea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Periodo Posoperatorio , Calidad de Vida , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In a period of 18 months, 2,469 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with a thrombolytic agent were prospectively registered in 61 hospitals. Most patients (73%) were treated with streptokinase. Intracranial hemorrhage was observed in 24 patients, corresponding to an incidence rate of 1% (95% confidence interval 0.6% to 1.3%). The median time interval between the start of thrombolytic therapy and the first clinical signs of intracranial bleeding was 16 h (range 3 to 36). In total, 16 (66%) of the 24 patients died as a result of cerebral hematoma. To determine clinical predictive factors, a case-control study was conducted. For every patient with intracranial hemorrhage, two control patients who received thrombolytic therapy because of acute infarction in the same hospital and in the same period were selected. Detailed clinical characteristics of 22 of the 24 patients as well as of 7 other patients with documented intracerebral bleeding from the European Cooperative Study Group and of 2 patients who sustained intracranial hemorrhage outside the registry period were compared with 62 control patients. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicate that patients taking an oral anticoagulant before admission, patients with a body weight less than 70 kg and those greater than 65 years old are at higher risk for intracranial hemorrhage during thrombolytic therapy.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Cerebral/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiología , Estreptoquinasa/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Estreptoquinasa/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review is to assess the value and limitations of balloon angioplasty for the treatment of saphenous vein bypass graft obstructions. The potential efficacy of new interventional techniques is discussed. BACKGROUND: Treatment of ischemia due to saphenous vein bypass graft obstructions poses a difficult problem that will be encountered more often as the pool of surgically treated patients continues to accumulate. Reoperation is technically demanding and is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Balloon angioplasty may provide a suitable alternative. METHODS: The review proposes a classification of patients with attempted saphenous vein graft angioplasty according to expected early and late outcome based on the data obtained from the relevant published data and personal experience. RESULTS: Angioplasty of a nonocclusive obstruction in a saphenous vein bypass graft has an initial success rate of approximately 90% and is a safe procedure (procedural death rate < 1%, myocardial infarction rate < 4%). The overall average restenosis rate is 42%. Surgical standby is limited and technically difficult. Angioplasty of chronic total occlusions in old grafts is associated with poor initial and long-term results. The long-term clinical results are unfavorable because of the continuing progression of disease in nontreated vein graft segments and native coronary arteries, in addition to the high restenosis rate. New techniques, although promising, have shown neither better initial results nor reduction of restenosis. Stent placement may be useful in longer graft lesions containing friable material. CONCLUSIONS: Patients may be classified into three groups according to expected early and late outcome on the basis of 1) unfavorable graft anatomy, 2) risk of cardiogenic shock in event of acute graft closure, and 3) age of grafts. The three groups are 1) those with an initial high success, low procedural risk and low restenosis rate; 2) those with an initial high success but high procedural risk and moderate to high restenosis rate; and 3) those with a low success, high risk and high restenosis rate. Balloon angioplasty to treat lesions in venous bypass grafts should be considered a palliative procedure, not a long-term solution, for ongoing progression of coronary artery and vein graft disease. The induced high restenosis rate remains a significant problem.