Proteinuria in Dent disease: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Dent disease is a rare X-linked recessive proximal tubulopathy caused by mutations in CLCN5 (Dent-1) or OCRL (Dent-2). As a rule, total protein excretion (TPE) is low in tubular proteinuria compared with glomerular disease. Several authors have reported nephrotic-range proteinuria (NP) and glomerulosclerosis in Dent disease. Therefore, we aimed to analyze protein excretion in patients with documented CLCN5 or OCRL mutations in a systematic literature review. DESIGN: PubMed and Embase were searched for cases with documented CLCN5 or OCRL mutations and (semi-)quantitative data on protein excretion. The most reliable data (i.e., TPE > protein-creatinine ratio > Albustix) was used for NP classification. RESULTS: Data were available on 148 patients from 47 reports: 126 had a CLCN5 and 22 an OCRLmutation. TPE was not significantly different between both forms (p = 0.11). Fifty-five of 126 (43.7 %) Dent-1 vs 13/22 (59.1 %) Dent-2 patients met the definition of NP (p = 0.25). Serum albumin was normal in all reported cases (24/148). Glomerulosclerosis was noted in 20/32 kidney biopsies and was strongly related to tubulointerstitial fibrosis, but not to kidney function or proteinuria. CONCLUSION: More than half of the patients with both forms of Dent disease have NP, and the presence of low molecular weight proteinuria in a patient with NP in the absence of edema and hypoalbuminemia should prompt genetic testing. Even with normal renal function, glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis are present in Dent disease. The role of proteinuria in the course of the disease needs to be examined further in longitudinal studies.

Objective Home-Monitoring of Physical Activity, Cardiovascular Parameters, and Sleep in Pediatric Obesity.

Introduction: Clinical research and treatment of childhood obesity is challenging, and objective biomarkers obtained in a home-setting are needed. The aim of this study was to determine the potential of novel digital endpoints gathered by a home-monitoring platform in pediatric obesity. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 28 children with obesity aged 6-16 years were included and monitored for 28 days. Patients wore a smartwatch, which measured physical activity (PA), heart rate (HR), and sleep. Furthermore, daily blood pressure (BP) measurements were performed. Data from 128 healthy children were utilized for comparison. Differences between patients and controls were assessed via linear mixed effect models. Results: Data from 28 patients (average age 11.6 years, 46% male, average body mass index 30.9) and 128 controls (average age 11.1 years, 46% male, average body mass index 18.0) were analyzed. Patients were recruited between November 2018 and February 2020. For patients, the median compliance for the measurements ranged from 55% to 100% and the highest median compliance was observed for the smartwatch-related measurements (81-100%). Patients had a lower daily PA level (4,597 steps vs. 6,081 steps, 95% confidence interval [CI] 862-2,108) and peak PA level (1,115 steps vs. 1,392 steps, 95% CI 136-417), a higher nighttime HR (81 bpm vs. 71 bpm, 95% CI 6.3-12.3) and daytime HR (98 bpm vs. 88 bpm, 95% CI 7.6-12.6), a higher systolic BP (115 mm Hg vs. 104 mm Hg, 95% CI 8.1-14.5) and diastolic BP (76 mm Hg vs. 65 mm Hg, 95% CI 8.7-12.7), and a shorter sleep duration (difference 0.5 h, 95% CI 0.2-0.7) compared to controls. Conclusion: Remote monitoring via wearables in pediatric obesity has the potential to objectively measure the disease burden in the home-setting. The novel endpoints demonstrate significant differences in PA level, HR, BP, and sleep duration between patients and controls. Future studies are needed to determine the capacity of the novel digital endpoints to detect effect of interventions.

Do authors report surgical expertise in open spine surgery related randomized controlled trials? A systematic review on quality of reporting.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of published trials in orthopedic spine literature. OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality of reporting in open spine surgery randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between 2005 and 2010 with special focus on the reporting of surgical skill or expertise. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In technically demanding procedures such as spine surgery, a surgeon's skill and expertise is expected to play an important role in the outcome of the procedure. To appraise the reported treatment effect of spine surgery related RCTs adequately, any potential skill or experience bias must be reported. METHODS: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were systematically searched for open spine surgery RCTs published between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2010. Percutaneous techniques were excluded. The quality of reporting of all eligible studies was determined using the checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial. The reporting of surgeons' skill and experience was scored additionally. Subsequently, all authors were surveyed to determine if any information on methodological safeguards was omitted from their reports. All data were analyzed in 2-year time frames. RESULTS: Ninety-nine RCTs were included. Ten studies (10%) described surgical skill or experience, mostly as a description of the learning curve. The majority of publications were unclear about "concealment of treatment allocation" (77%), "blinding of participants" (68%), "blinding of outcome assessors" (77%), and "adhering to the intention-to-treat principle" (67%). Of the 99 surveys, we received 22 (22%) completed questionnaires. In these questionnaires, information about essential methodological safeguards was often available, although not reported in the primary publication. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in open spine surgery RCTs information on skill and experience is scarcely reported. Authors often fail to report essential methodological safeguards. These studies may therefore be prone to expertise bias.