Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 39(1): 101-110, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33569982

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many general practitioners (GPs) experience communication problems in medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) consultations as they are insufficiently equipped with adequate communication skills or do not apply these in MUS consultations. OBJECTIVE: To define the most important learnable communication elements during MUS consultations according to MUS patients, GPs, MUS experts and teachers and to explore how these elements should be taught to GPs and GP trainees. METHODS: Five focus groups were conducted with homogeneous groups of MUS patients, GPs, MUS experts and teachers. MUS patients and GPs formulated a list of important communication elements. MUS experts identified from this list the most important communication elements. Teachers explored how these elements could be trained to GPs and GP trainees. Two researchers independently analysed the data applying the principles of constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: MUS patients and GPs identified a list of important communication elements. From this list, MUS experts selected five important communication elements: (1) thorough somatic and psychosocial exploration, (2) communication with empathy, (3) creating a shared understanding of the problem, (4) providing a tangible explanation and (5) taking control. Teachers described three teaching methods for these communication elements: (1) awareness and reflection of GPs about their feelings towards MUS patients, (2) assessment of GPs' individual needs and (3) training and supervision in daily practice. CONCLUSION: Teachers consider a focus on personal attitudes and needs, which should be guided by opportunities to practice and receive supervision, as the best method to teach GPs about communication in MUS consultations.KEY POINTSMany GPs experience difficulties in communication with patients with MUS.There is a need to equip GPs with communication skills to manage MUS consultations more adequately.Role-playing with simulation patients, reflection on video-consultations and joint consultations with the supervisor may increase the GPs' awareness of their attitude towards MUS patients and may help GPs to identify their individual learning-points.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Comunicación , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Derivación y Consulta
2.
BMC Fam Pract ; 19(1): 81, 2018 06 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29875016

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guideline adherence in chronic kidney disease management is low, despite guideline implementation initiatives. Knowing general practitioners' (GPs') perspectives of management of early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the applicability of the national interdisciplinary guideline could support strategies to improve quality of care. METHOD: Qualitative focus group study with 27 GPs in the Netherlands. Three analysts open-coded and comparatively analysed the data. Mind-mapping sessions were performed after data-saturation. RESULTS: Five themes emerged: defining CKD, knowledge and awareness, patient-physician interaction, organisation of CKD care and value of the guideline. A key finding was the abstractness of the CKD concept. The GPs expressed various perspectives about defining CKD and interpreting estimated glomerular filtration rates. Views about clinical relevance influenced the decision-making, although factual knowledge seems lacking. Striving to inform well enough without creating anxiety and to explain suitably for the intellectual ability of the patient caused tension in the patient-physician interaction. Integration with cardiovascular disease-management programmes was mentioned as a way of implementing CKD care in the future. The guideline was perceived as a rough guide rather than a leading document. CONCLUSION: CKD is perceived as an abstract rather than a clinical concept. Abstractness plays a role in all formulated themes. Management of CKD patients in primary care is complex and is influenced by physician-bound considerations related to individual knowledge and perception of the importance of CKD. Strategies are needed to improve GPs' understanding of the concept of CKD by education, a holistic approach to guidelines, and integration of CKD care into cardiovascular programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Médicos Generales , Adhesión a Directriz , Atención Primaria de Salud , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Anciano , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Médicos Generales/psicología , Médicos Generales/normas , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Gravedad del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Investigación Cualitativa , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia
3.
Ann Fam Med ; 10(4): 330-6, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22778121

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Depression is highly prevalent in palliative care patients. In clinical practice, there is concern about both insufficient and excessive diagnosis and treatment of depression. In the Netherlands, family physicians have a central role in delivering palliative care. We explored variation in family physicians' opinions regarding the recognition, diagnosis, and management of depression in palliative care patients. METHODS: We conducted a focus group study in a sample of family physicians with varied practice locations and varying expertise in palliative care. Transcripts were analyzed independently by 2 researchers using constant comparative analysis in ATLAS.ti. RESULTS: In 4 focus group discussions with 22 family physicians, the physicians described the diagnostic and therapeutic process for depression in palliative care patients as a continuous and overlapping process. Differentiating between normal and abnormal sadness was viewed as challenging. The physicians did not strictly apply criteria of depressive disorder but rather relied on their clinical judgment and strongly considered patients' context and background factors. They indicated that managing depression in palliative care patients is mainly supportive and nonspecific. Antidepressant drugs were seldom prescribed. The physicians described difficulties in diagnosing and treating depression in palliative care, and gave suggestions to improve management of depression in palliative care patients in primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians perceive the diagnosis and management of depression in palliative care patients as challenging. They rely on open communication and a long-standing physician-patient relationship in which the patient's context is of great importance. This approach fits with the patient-centered care that is promoted in primary care.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Médicos de Familia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Dimensión del Dolor , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Psicometría , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/psicología
4.
BMC Fam Pract ; 10: 68, 2009 Sep 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19775481

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persistent presentation of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) is troublesome for general practitioners (GPs) and causes pressure on the doctor-patient relationship. As a consequence, GPs face the problem of establishing an ongoing, preferably effective relationship with these patients. This study aims at exploring GPs' perceptions about explaining MUS to patients and about how relationships with these patients evolve over time in daily practice. METHODS: A qualitative approach, interviewing a purposive sample of twenty-two Dutch GPs within five focus groups. Data were analyzed according to the principles of constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: GPs recognise the importance of an adequate explanation of the diagnosis of MUS but often feel incapable of being able to explain it clearly to their patients. GPs therefore indicate that they try to reassure patients in non-specific ways, for example by telling patients that there is no disease, by using metaphors and by normalizing the symptoms. When patients keep returning with MUS, GPs report the importance of maintaining the doctor-patient relationship. GPs describe three different models to do this; mutual alliance characterized by ritual care (e.g. regular physical examination, regular doctor visits) with approval of the patient and the doctor, ambivalent alliance characterized by ritual care without approval of the doctor and non-alliance characterized by cutting off all reasons for encounter in which symptoms are not of somatic origin. CONCLUSION: GPs feel difficulties in explaining the symptoms. GPs report that, when patients keep presenting with MUS, they focus on maintaining the doctor-patient relationship by using ritual care. In this care they meticulously balance between maintaining a good doctor-patient relationship and the prevention of unintended consequences of unnecessary interventions.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Médicos de Familia/psicología , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Psicológicos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta , Trastornos Somatomorfos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Somatomorfos/terapia
5.
Neuron ; 43(3): 427-35, 2004 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15294149

RESUMEN

Navigation through familiar environments can rely upon distinct neural representations that are related to different memory systems with either the hippocampus or the caudate nucleus at their core. However, it is a fundamental question whether and how these systems interact during route recognition. To address this issue, we combined a functional neuroimaging approach with a naturally occurring, well-controlled human model of caudate nucleus dysfunction (i.e., preclinical and early-stage Huntington's disease). Our results reveal a noncompetitive interaction so that the hippocampus compensates for gradual caudate nucleus dysfunction with a gradual activity increase, maintaining normal behavior. Furthermore, we revealed an interaction between medial temporal and caudate activity in healthy subjects, which was adaptively modified in Huntington patients to allow compensatory hippocampal processing. Thus, the two memory systems contribute in a noncompetitive, cooperative manner to route recognition, which enables the hippocampus to compensate seamlessly for the functional degradation of the caudate nucleus.


Asunto(s)
Núcleo Caudado/fisiología , Hipocampo/fisiología , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Reconocimiento en Psicología/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad de Huntington/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Huntington/psicología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimulación Luminosa/métodos
6.
Patient Educ Couns ; 63(1-2): 55-63, 2006 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16644175

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have shown that patients' active participation to their medical interaction is beneficial for their information processing and their quality of life. Unfortunately, cancer patients often act rather passively in contact with their oncologists. We investigated whether cancer patients' participation in radiation therapy consultations could be enhanced by specific communicative behaviours of the radiation oncologists (ROs). METHODS: Eight ROs and 160 patients participated; 80 patients in the pre training group and 80 patients in the post training group. The ROs were trained to use specific communicative behaviours that are supposed to encourage patient participation. In the training special attention was paid to communicative requirements in the first minutes of the consultation. The communicative behaviours of the ROs and the cancer patients were measured by the Roter Interaction Analysis System, and compared before and after the RO training. RESULTS: From the start throughout the entire consultation, patients in the post training group participated more in interactions than patients in the pre training group: they discussed more psychosocial issues, expressed more concerns and contributed more to decision-making. CONCLUSION: Cancer patients' participation in the initial radiation oncology consultations can be increased by training of ROs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The results suggest that doctors working with cancer patients should receive communication training and feedback on a regular base.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Educación Médica Continua/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/educación , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Oncología por Radiación/educación , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Competencia Clínica/normas , Conducta Cooperativa , Toma de Decisiones , Retroalimentación Psicológica , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Países Bajos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Oncología por Radiación/normas
7.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol ; 25(4): 502-11, 2003 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12911104

RESUMEN

The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the possible role of two cognitive styles--weak central coherence and poor cognitive shifting--in predicting social improvement in patients with autistic disorder. Thirty patients, largely similar in age (young adults), intelligence (high-functioning) and living conditions (residential treatment in the same unit) were assessed at two separate time points with a 3-year interval between pretest and posttest. At pretest central coherence, cognitive shifting and several aspects of social functioning--symptom severity, social intelligence and social competence--were measured. At posttest social functioning was reassessed. Unlike central coherence, cognitive shifting was identified as a significant prognostic marker. This differential outcome might be an indication that patients with poor cognitive shifting and patients with weak central coherence have different prognoses with the current, highly structured treatment milieu; it is unknown whether patients with poor cognitive flexibility might benefit more from treatments specifically designed to address this problem.


Asunto(s)
Atención , Trastorno Autístico/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/fisiopatología , Formación de Concepto , Inteligencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastornos del Conocimiento/clasificación , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Aprendizaje Discriminativo , Ambiente , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Control Interno-Externo , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Percepción/fisiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Ajuste Social , Escalas de Wechsler
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA