Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gut ; 65(12): 1981-1987, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26306760

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In pancreatic cancer, preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) increases complications compared with surgery without PBD, demonstrated by a recent randomised controlled trial (RCT). This outcome might be related to the plastic endoprosthesis used. Metal stents may reduce the PBD-related complications risk. METHODS: A prospective multicentre cohort study was performed including patients with obstructive jaundice due to pancreatic cancer, scheduled to undergo PBD before surgery. This cohort was added to the earlier RCT (ISRCTN31939699). The RCT protocol was adhered to, except PBD was performed with a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS). This FCSEMS cohort was compared with the RCT's plastic stent cohort. PBD-related complications were the primary outcome. Three-group comparison of overall complications including early surgery patients was performed. RESULTS: 53 patients underwent PBD with FCSEMS compared with 102 patients treated with plastic stents. Patients' characteristics did not differ. PBD-related complication rates were 24% in the FCSEMS group vs 46% in the plastic stent group (relative risk of plastic stent use 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.2, p=0.011). Stent-related complications (occlusion and exchange) were 6% vs 31%. Surgical complications did not differ, 40% vs 47%. Overall complication rates for the FCSEMS, plastic stent and early surgery groups were 51% vs 74% vs 39%. CONCLUSIONS: For PBD in pancreatic cancer, FCSEMS yield a better outcome compared with plastic stents. Although early surgery without PBD remains the treatment of choice, FCSEMS should be preferred over plastic stents whenever PBD is indicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Registry (NTR3142).


Asunto(s)
Drenaje , Ictericia Obstructiva/terapia , Metales , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Plásticos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Stents , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Ictericia Obstructiva/etiología , Países Bajos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Plásticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Stents/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Brain Spine ; 4: 102756, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38510592

RESUMEN

Introduction: Directional Leads (dLeads) represent a new technical tool in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), and a rapidly growing population of patients receive dLeads. Research question: The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies(EANS) functional neurosurgery Task Force on dLeads conducted a survey of DBS specialists in Europe to evaluate their use, applications, advantages, and disadvantages. Material and methods: EANS functional neurosurgery and European Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ESSFN) members were asked to complete an online survey with 50 multiple-choice and open questions on their use of dLeads in clinical practice. Results: Forty-nine respondents from 16 countries participated in the survey (n = 38 neurosurgeons, n = 8 neurologists, n = 3 DBS nurses). Five had not used dLeads. All users reported that dLeads provided an advantage (n = 23 minor, n = 21 major). Most surgeons (n = 35) stated that trajectory planning does not differ when implanting dLeads or conventional leads. Most respondents selected dLeads for the ability to optimize stimulation parameters (n = 41). However, the majority (n = 24), regarded time-consuming programming as the main disadvantage of this technology. Innovations that were highly valued by most participants included full 3T MRI compatibility, remote programming, and closed loop technology. Discussion and conclusion: Directional leads are widely used by European DBS specialists. Despite challenges with programming time, users report that dLeads have had a positive impact and maintain an optimistic view of future technological advances.

3.
Ann Oncol ; 23(10): 2642-2649, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22532585

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tumor location of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) might influence survival after resection. METHODS: A consecutive series of 175 patients who had undergone a potentially curative resection of extrahepatic CCA was analyzed. We calculated concordance indices of different constructed prognostic models for survival including TNM (tumour-node-metastasis) staging and developed a nomogram of the most sensitive model. RESULTS: Overall cancer-specific survival rates were 83%, 58%, and 26% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Cancer-specific survival according to location was 42% for proximal, 23% for mid, and 19% for distal CCA after 5 years. Tumor location was not an independent significant predictor (P = 0.06). A prognostic model using all potential prognostic variables predicted survival better compared with TNM staging (concordance index 0.65 versus 0.63). A reduced model containing only lymph node status, microscopically residual tumor status, and tumor differentiation grade, also outperformed TNM staging (concordance index 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location of extrahepatic CCA does not independently predict cancer-specific survival after resection. We developed a nomogram, based on a prognostic model with lymph node status, microscopically residual tumor status of resection margins, and tumor differentiation grade, that predicted survival better than TNM staging.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/cirugía , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Br J Surg ; 96(6): 579-92, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19434703

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study examined the clinical outcome of patients with pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: A systematic literature search produced individual data for 311 surgically and 73 non-surgically treated patients with pancreatic RCC metastases. A further ten patients underwent resection at the authors' institution. RESULTS: In the resected group, pancreatic metastases were solitary in 65.3 per cent, symptomatic in 57.4 per cent, and were preceded and/or accompanied by extrapancreatic disease in 22.3 per cent. Respective values in the unresected group were 59, 60 and 58 per cent. Disease-free survival rates were 76.0 and 57.0 per cent respectively at 2 and 5 years after resection, and overall survival rates were 80.6 and 72.6 per cent. The only significant risk factor for disease-free survival after pancreatic resection was extrapancreatic disease (P = 0.001), and that for overall survival was symptomatic RCC metastasis (P = 0.031). Two- and 5-year overall survival rates were 41 and 14 per cent respectively in unresected patients. CONCLUSION: The actuarial 5-year overall survival rate following pancreatic surgery for RCC metastases was 72.6 per cent, as determined by pooled analysis from published series. Extrapancreatic disease was an independent risk factor for recurrence, but had no significant impact on overall survival.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/secundario , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 69: 30-33, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31665685

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation (STN DBS) is proven effective in improving symptoms of Parkinson's Disease (PD), previous literature demonstrates a discrepancy between objective improvement and patients' perception thereof. We aimed to examine whether postoperative stimulation challenge tests (SCT) alters patients' satisfaction after STN DBS for PD. METHODS: Fifty-four PD patients underwent preoperative levodopa challenge tests and were routinely invited for SCT 1-2 years postoperatively. SEverity of predominantly Nondopaminergic Symptoms in PD (SENS-PD) scores quantified non-dopaminergic disease severity. Motor functioning was quantified using Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III scores; a ratio between conditions ON and OFF (preoperative Med-ON vs. Med-OFF, and postoperative Med-ON/Stim-ON vs. Med-OFF/Stim-OFF) reflected treatment benefit. 'Global Impression of Change' (GIC) and 'Global Satisfaction with Surgery' (GSS) Likert scales were filled out before and immediately after SCT. RESULTS: Postoperative Med-ON/Stim-ON severity was lower than preoperative ON severity. Disease severity scores were not different between assessments. GIC and GSS scores were higher after SCT versus before (GIC: Z = -3.80, r = 0.37, subjects indicating maximum scores before SCT: 32.1%, after SCT: 57.1%; GSS: Z = -3.69, r = 0.35, maximum scores before SCT: 25.0%, after SCT: 46.4%). Higher non-dopaminergic disease severity was associated with lower GIC and GSS scores (GIC: OR 1.2 (95%CI 1.0-1.3); GSS: OR 1.2 (95%CI 1.1-1.3), while motor-scores and magnitude of DBS-effects were not. CONCLUSION: SCT improves patients' satisfaction and is recommended especially in case of suboptimal subjective valuations. This information should be considered in clinical practice and in the context of clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Núcleo Subtalámico/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 65: 62-66, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31105015

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether intraoperative testing during awake Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can be used to postoperatively identify the best settings for chronic stimulation. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intraoperative test stimulation is indicative of postoperative stimulation results. METHODS: Records of consecutive Parkinson's Disease patients who received STN DBS between September 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The best depth identified after intraoperative stimulation via the microelectrode's stimulation tip was compared with the depth of the contact selected for chronic stimulation after a standard monopolar contact review. Moreover, thresholds for induction of clinical effects (optimal improvement of rigidity and induction of side-effects) were compared between stimulation at the postoperatively selected contact and at the corresponding intraoperative depth. RESULTS: Records of 119 patients were analyzed (mean (SD) age 60.5 (6.5) years, 31.9% female, 238 STNs). In 75% of cases, the postoperatively selected contact corresponded with the intraoperative depth with the largest therapeutic window or was immediately dorsal to it. Higher stimulation intensities were required postoperatively than intraoperatively to relieve rigidity (p = 0.002) and induce capsular side-effects (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: In the majority of cases, the postoperative contact for chronic stimulation was at a similar level or immediately dorsal with respect to the identified best intraoperative depth. Postoperatively, relief of rigidity and induction of capsular side-effects occur at higher stimulation intensities than during intraoperative test stimulation.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Electrodos Implantados , Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria/métodos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Núcleo Subtalámico/fisiología , Anciano , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/instrumentación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria/instrumentación , Masculino , Microelectrodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Cuidados Posoperatorios/instrumentación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Br J Surg ; 95(6): 735-43, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18300268

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic dissemination is an important predictor of survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. The incidence and clinical consequences of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients who undergo resection are unknown. METHODS: In a consecutive series of 160 patients with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, 75 (46.9 per cent) had positive lymph nodes (N1). The relation of extracapsular LNI with tumour stage and number of positive nodes was evaluated and its prognostic significance analysed. RESULTS: Extracapsular LNI was identified in 44 (59 per cent) of the 75 patients. Median overall survival was 30 and 18 months in patients with intracapsular and extracapsular LNI respectively (P = 0.015). The 5-year overall survival rate was 20 and 9 per cent respectively, compared with 59 per cent in patients without LNI (N0). Extracapsular LNI and tumour differentiation were independent prognostic factors for survival. In patients with N1 disease, extracapsular LNI was the only significant prognostic factor for recurrent disease after radical resection (R0). CONCLUSION: The presence of extracapsular LNI identifies a subgroup of patients who have a significantly worse prognosis. Adjuvant therapy is advised following resection in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Ampolla Hepatopancreática/patología , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Ampolla Hepatopancreática/cirugía , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia
8.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 150(9): 509-11, 2006 Mar 04.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16553052

RESUMEN

Surgery in patients with obstructive jaundice caused by a periampullary (pancreas, papilla, distal bile duct) tumour is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications than in non-jaundiced patients. Preoperative biliary drainage was introduced in an attempt to improve the general condition and thus reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. More recently, the focus has shifted towards the negative effects of drainage, such as an increase of infectious complications. This has raised doubts as to whether biliary drainage should always be performed in these patients. The project referred to above involves a randomised multicentre trial to compare the outcome of a 'preoperative biliary-drainage strategy' (standard strategy) with that of an 'early-surgery' strategy with respect to the incidence of severe complications (primary-outcome measure), hospital stay, number of invasive diagnostic tests, costs, and quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/cirugía , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/complicaciones , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Ictericia Obstructiva/etiología , Ictericia Obstructiva/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 40(5): 551-558, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24388408

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Resection is the only life-prolonging option for pancreatic or periampullary cancer. Cell-mediated immunity might reduce progression of metastasis or local recurrence likelihood, but surgery associated morbidity can suppress this immunity. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of complications on cancer specific survival after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic and periampullary cancer. METHOD: 517 consecutive patients who underwent PD for pancreatic or periampullary adenocarcinoma were analysed. RESULTS: After median follow-up of 24 (14-44) months, 377 (73%) patients had died from progressive disease, 140 (27%) were alive. Median survival for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 22 (18-25) months following an uncomplicated postoperative course versus 16 (13-19) months for patients with major surgical complications (p = 0.021). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that microscopically residual disease (R1), complications, and adjuvant therapy were independent factors for recurrence. Within the R1 group, survival for patients with complications was even more limited, 9.7 (8.3-11.0) versus 18.7 (15.0-22.5) for those without (p < 0.001). For patients with R1 resection complications was the only independent predictor for a shorter time interval to death (hazard ratio 1.96; 95% CI 1.16-3.30). Complications did not influence survival of patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Complications after resection are independently related to an impaired survival following PD for pancreatic, but not periampullary cancer. The effect is even more dramatic in patients who had an R1 resection. Although the relation is not causal per se, the findings support the hypothesis of a complication-induced, compromised immunity rendering patients more susceptible for recurrent disease.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Ampolla Hepatopancreática , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/mortalidad , Femenino , Vaciamiento Gástrico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasia Residual , Fístula Pancreática , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Gastropatías , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Int J Surg ; 9(8): 655-8, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21925294

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that a selective group of patients with primary cystic neoplasms of the pancreas can be managed conservatively by radiological follow-up. The aim of this study was to analyze if such a strategy is efficient and safe. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analyses was performed of patients who underwent resection between January 1992 and January 2006 for primary cystic neoplasms of the pancreas in an era of aggressive management (i.e. all patients underwent resection) in order to analyze if the selective algorithm as proposed by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center is efficient and safe. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent a resection for pancreatic cysts. Thirty-five percent of the patients with symptomatic cysts had a (pre)malignant lesion compared with 15% of the patients with an incidental cysts. In hospital mortality occurred in 1% of the patients and a postoperative complications in 39%. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram was able to correctly identify all patients with a benign incidental cyst. CONCLUSION: A selective management strategy can be implemented and algorithm proposed by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram is safe and efficient.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Pancreatectomía , Quiste Pancreático/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Árboles de Decisión , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quiste Pancreático/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
12.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 13(4): 814-20, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18726134

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) has been introduced to improve outcome after surgery in patients suffering from obstructive jaundice due to a potentially resectable proximal or distal bile duct/pancreatic head lesion. In experimental models, PBD is almost exclusively associated with beneficial results: improved liver function and nutritional status; reduction of systemic endotoxemia; cytokine release; and, as a result, an improved immune response. Mortality was significantly reduced in these animal models. Human studies show conflicting results. FINDINGS: For distal obstruction, currently the "best-evidence" available clearly shows that routine PBD does not yield the appreciated improvement in postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing resection. Moreover, PBD harbors its own complications. However, most of the available data are outdated or suffer from methodological deficits. CONCLUSION: The highest level of evidence for PBD to be performed in proximal obstruction, as well as over the preferred mode, is lacking but, nevertheless, assimilated in the treatment algorithm for many centers. Logistics and waiting lists, although sometimes inevitable, could be factors that might influence the decision to opt for PBD, as well as an extended diagnostic workup with laparoscopy (on indication) or scheduled preoperative chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Colestasis Extrahepática/cirugía , Drenaje , Ictericia Obstructiva/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Conductos Biliares Extrahepáticos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
13.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 26 Suppl 2: 221-32, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18081665

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic approach to patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) is complicated by the fact that patients are presented to the physician at different stages of disease and in the presence of varying clinical symptoms. Generally, an expectant approach is justified for patients with asymptomatic CP. At present, patients with symptoms related to gland destruction are initially treated by endoscopic means, while surgical treatment of CP is usually reserved for intractable abdominal pain, suspicion of cancer, and complications such as persistent pseudocysts. AIM: To review the studies currently available evaluating surgical and/or endoscopic management of CP. RESULTS: Improvements in imaging techniques, as well as a better understanding of the pathophysiology of CP and mechanisms causing pain, have led to a more conscious selection of patients for surgery. Type of surgery depends on whether the pancreatic duct is dilated, presence of an inflammatory mass and occurrence of complications (pseudocysts, gastric outlet obstruction). Eventually, after initial endoscopic treatment, a substantial number of patients still need surgery for persistent complaints. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with symptomatic CP, a multidisciplinary approach is indicated with low threshold to surgical intervention, since long-term pain relief is accomplished more often after surgical treatment than after endoscopic treatment.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Colestasis/etiología , Colestasis/cirugía , Humanos , Seudoquiste Pancreático/etiología , Seudoquiste Pancreático/cirugía , Pancreatitis Crónica/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA