Influence of key factors on ammonia and nitrous oxide emission factors for excreta deposited by livestock and land-applied manure.

Ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from livestock manure management have a significant impact on air quality and climate change. There is an increasing urgency to improve our understanding of drivers influencing these emissions. We analysed the DATAMAN ("DATAbase for MANaging greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions factors") database to identify key factors influencing (i) NH3 emission factors (EFs) for cattle and swine manure applied to land and (ii) N2O EFs for cattle and swine manure applied to land, and (iii) cattle urine, dung and sheep urine deposited during grazing. Slurry dry matter (DM) content, total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) concentration and method of application were significant drivers of NH3 EFs from cattle and swine slurry. Mixed effect models explained 14-59 % of the variance in NH3 EFs. Apart from the method of application, the significant influence of manure DM, manure TAN concentration or pH on NH3 EFs suggests mitigation strategies should focus on these. Identifying key factors influencing N2O EFs from manures and livestock grazing was more challenging, likely because of the complexities associated with microbial processes and soil physical properties impacting N2O production and emissions. Generally, significant factors were soil-related e.g. soil water content, pH, clay content, suggesting mitigations may need to consider the conditions of the receiving environment for manure spreading and grazing deposition. Total variability explained by terms in mixed effect model was on average 66 %, with the random effect 'experiment identification number' explaining, on average, 41 % of the total variability in the models. We suspect this term captured the effect of non-measured manure, soil and climate factors and any biases in application and measurement technique effects associated with individual experiments. This analysis has helped to improve our understanding of key factors of NH3 and N2O EFs for inclusion within models. With more studies over time, insights into the underlying processes influencing emissions will be further improved.

Meta-analysis of New Zealand's nitrous oxide emission factors for ruminant excreta supports disaggregation based on excreta form, livestock type and slope class.

Globally, animal excreta (dung and urine) deposition onto grazed pastures represents more than half of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. To account for these emissions, New Zealand currently employs urine and dung emission factor (EF3) values of 1.0% and 0.25%, respectively, for all livestock. These values are primarily based on field studies conducted on fertile, flatland pastures predominantly used for dairy cattle production but do not consider emissions from hill land pastures primarily used for sheep, deer and non-dairy cattle. The objective of this study was to determine the most suitable urine and dung EF3 values for dairy cattle, non-dairy cattle, and sheep grazing pastures on different slopes based on a meta-analysis of New Zealand EF3 studies. As none of the studies included deer excreta, deer EF3 values were estimated from cattle and sheep values. The analysis revealed that a single dung EF3 value should be maintained, although the value should be reduced from 0.25% to 0.12%. Furthermore, urine EF3 should be disaggregated by livestock type (cattle > sheep) and topography (flatland and low sloping hill country > medium and steep sloping hill country), with EF3 values ranging from 0.08% (sheep urine on medium and steep slopes) to 0.98% (dairy cattle on flatland and low slopes). While the mechanism(s) causing differences in urine EF3 values for sheep and cattle are unknown, the 'slope effect' on urine EF3 is partly due to differences in soil chemical and physical characteristics, which influence soil microbial processes on the different slope classes. The revised EF3 values were used in an updated New Zealand inventory approach, resulting in 30% lower national N2O emissions for 2017 compared to using the current EF3 values. We recommend using the revised EF3 values in New Zealand's national greenhouse gas inventory to more accurately capture N2O emissions from livestock grazing.

Ammonia emission factors for N fertilizers applied to two contrasting grassland soils.

Ammonia volatilization from nitrogen (N) fertilizer applied throughout the year to two soil types was measured using a system of small wind tunnels. Losses from urea ranged from 12 to 46% of the applied N. Small losses, averaging <1%, were measured from ammonium nitrate (AN) and calcium nitrate applications. Factors influencing these losses are discussed. Using these results and those from other workers, emission factors for urea and AN applications to grassland in the UK were determined as 23.0 and 1.6% of the applied N, respectively. Emission factors for these fertilizers when applied to arable land were estimated as 11.8 and 0.8%, respectively. The emission factor for all other applied N (as straight and compound fertilizers) was assumed to be similar to that for AN. Calculations showed that fertilizer applications to agricultural land in the UK contributes 34 kt NH3-N per year, equivalent to 17% of the total annual NH3 emission.

Statistical analysis of nitrous oxide emission factors from pastoral agriculture field trials conducted in New Zealand.

Between 11 May 2000 and 31 January 2013, 185 field trials were conducted across New Zealand to measure the direct nitrous oxide (N2O) emission factors (EF) from nitrogen (N) sources applied to pastoral soils. The log(EF) data were analysed statistically using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method. To estimate mean EF values for each N source, best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) were calculated. For lowland soils, mean EFs for dairy cattle urine and dung, sheep urine and dung and urea fertiliser were 1.16 ± 0.19% and 0.23 ± 0.05%, 0.55 ± 0.19% and 0.08 ± 0.02% and 0.48 ± 0.13%, respectively, each significantly different from one another (p < 0.05), except for sheep urine and urea fertiliser. For soils in terrain with slopes >12°, mean EFs were significantly lower. Thus, urine and dung EFs should be disaggregated for sheep and cattle as well as accounting for terrain.

Quantification of reductions in ammonia emissions from fertiliser urea and animal urine in grazed pastures with urease inhibitors for agriculture inventory: New Zealand as a case study.

Urea is the key nitrogen (N) fertiliser for grazed pastures, and is also present in excreted animal urine. In soil, urea hydrolyses rapidly to ammonium (NH4(+)) and may be lost as ammonia (NH3) gas. Unlike nitrous oxide (N2O), however, NH3 is not a greenhouse gas although it can act as a secondary source of N2O, and hence contribute indirectly to global warming and stratospheric ozone depletion. Various urease inhibitors (UIs) have been used over the last 30 years to reduce NH3 losses. Among these, N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (nBTPT), sold under the trade name Agrotain®, is currently the most promising and effective when applied with urea or urine. Here we conduct a critical analysis of the published and non-published data on the effectiveness of nBTPT in reducing NH3 emission, from which adjusted values for FracGASF (fraction of total N fertiliser emitted as NH3) and FracGASM (fraction of total N from, animal manure and urine emitted as NH3) for the national agriculture greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory are recommended in order to provide accurate data for the inventory. We use New Zealand as a case study to assess and quantify the overall reduction in NH3 emission from urea and animal urine with the application of UI nBTPT. The available literature indicates that an application rate of 0.025% w/w (nBTPT per unit of N) is optimum for reducing NH3 emissions from temperate grasslands. UI-treated urine studies gave highly variable reductions (11-93%) with an average of 53% and a 95% confidence interval of 33-73%. New Zealand studies, using UI-treated urea, suggest that nBTPT (0.025% w/w) reduces NH3 emissions by 44.7%, on average, with a confidence interval of 39-50%. On this basis, a New Zealand specific value of 0.055 for FracGASF FNUI (fraction of urease inhibitor treated total fertiliser N emitted as NH3) is recommended for adoption where urea containing UI are applied as nBTPT at a rate of 0.025% w/w. Only a limited number of published data sets are available on the effectiveness of UI for reducing NH3 losses from animal urine-N deposited during grazing in a grazed pasture system. The same can be said about mixing UI with urine, rather than spraying UI before or after urine application. Since it was not possible to accurately measure the efficacy of UI in reducing NH3 emissions from animal urine-N deposited during grazing, we currently cannot recommend the adoption of a FracGASM value adjusted for the inclusion of UI.