Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 67
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 68, 2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866942

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For high-risk patients receiving right-sided colectomy, stoma formation is a safety strategy. Options are anastomosis with loop ileostomy, end ileostomy, or split stoma. The aim is to compare the outcome of these three options. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent right sided colectomy and stoma formation between January 2008 and December 2021 at two tertial referral centers in Switzerland. The primary outcome was the stoma associated complication rate within one year. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included. A total of 20 patients (17%) underwent primary anastomosis with loop ileostomy (PA group), 29 (25%) received an end ileostomy (ES group) and 67 (58%) received a split stoma (SS group). Stoma associated complication rate was 43% (n = 21) in PA and in ES group and 50% (n = 34) in SS group (n.s.). A total of 30% (n = 6) of patients in PA group needed reoperations, whereas 59% (n = 17) in ES and 58% (n = 39) in SS group had reoperations (P = 0.07). Wound infections occurred in 15% (n = 3) in PA, in 10% (n = 3) in ES, and in 30% (n = 20) in SS group (P = 0.08). A total of 13 patients (65%) in PA, 7 (24%) in ES, and 29 (43%) in SS group achieved stoma closure (P = 0.02). A total of 5 patients (38%) in PA group, 2 (15%) in ES, and 22 patients (67%) in SS group had a stoma-associated rehospitalization (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Primary anastomosis and loop ileostomy may be an option for selected patients. Patients with end ileostomies have fewer stoma-related readmissions than those with a split stoma, but they have a lower rate of stoma closure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial not registered.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Ileostomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reoperación , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Suiza , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Adulto
2.
Br J Surg ; 107(8): 960-969, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32187663

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefit of a perianal block as an adjunct to general or regional anaesthesia is debated. This RCT aimed to compare pain at 24 h and up to 14 days after proctological surgery in patients with and without a perianal block. METHODS: Between January 2018 and April 2019, patients were allocated to receive a perianal block with ropivacaine or placebo as an adjunct to anaesthesia. Patients, surgeons and assessors were blinded. The primary outcome was pain measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS) after 24 h. Secondary outcomes were need for rescue analgesia, and pain after 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 h. The mean, rest and maximum NRS scores were measured for 14 days. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were included, of whom 46 and 44 received general anaesthesia with or without ropivacaine respectively, and 23 and 25 received spinal anaesthesia with or without ropivacaine respectively (P = 0·858). The mean NRS score differed significantly at 24 h (mean(s.d.) 1·1(0·1) versus 2·3(0·2); P < 0·001), but not at 1 h (1·4(0·2) versus 2·2(0·3); P = 0·051). The NRS score was lower with use of ropivacaine at 2 h (1·0(0·2) versus 1·6(0·2); P = 0·045), 3 h (0·9(0·2) versus 1·5(0·2); P = 0·022), 6 h (1·1(0·2) versus 1·8(0·2); P = 0·042) and 12 h (1·2(0·2) versus 1·8(0·2); P = 0·034). The use of oral morphine equivalents was 10·2(1·4) and 16·6(2·5) mg with and without ropivacaine respectively (P = 0·028). The mean and maximum NRS scores within 14 days were lower when ropivacaine was used (95 per cent c.i. for difference 0·14 to 0·49 (P = 0·002) and 0·39 to 0·63 (P < 0·001) respectively). There was no injection-associated morbidity. CONCLUSION: Perianal block as an adjunct to general or regional anaesthesia should be recommended for proctological surgery. It yields a reduction in pain, a reduced need for opioids, and a faster recovery with minimal risk of adverse events. Registration number: NCT03405922 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).


ANTECEDENTES: Se discute el beneficio del bloqueo perianal asociado a la anestesia general o regional. Este ensayo clínico aleatorizado tuvo como objetivo comparar el dolor a las 24 horas y hasta los 14 días tras cirugía proctológica en pacientes con y sin bloqueo perianal. MÉTODOS: Entre enero de 2018 y abril de 2019 se asignaron los pacientes para recibir un bloqueo perianal con ropivacaína o placebo como complemento de la anestesia. Los pacientes, los cirujanos y los evaluadores desconocían el grupo al que habían sido aleatorizados los pacientes. La variable principal fue el dolor a las 24 horas medido en una escala de numérica (numeric rating scale, NRS). Las variables secundarias fueron la necesidad de analgesia de rescate y el dolor a las 1, 2, 3, 6 y 12 horas. También se obtuvieron las puntuaciones media, en reposo y máxima de NRS durante 14 días. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 138 pacientes, de los que 46 recibieron anestesia general con ropivacaína, 44 anestesia general sin ropivacaína, 23 anestesia raquídea con ropivacaína y 25 anestesia raquídea sin ropivacaína (P = 0,858). La puntuación media de NRS fue significativamente diferente a las 24 horas (1,1 ± 0,1 versus 2,3 ± 0,2; P < 0,001), pero no en la primera hora (1,4 ± 0,2 versus 2,2 ± 0,3; P = 0,051). La puntuación NRS fue inferior para la ropivacaína a las 2 horas (1,0 ± 0,2 versus 1,6 ± 0,2; P = 0,045), 3 horas (0,9 ± 0,2 versus 1,5 ± 0,2; P = 0,022), 6 horas (1,1 ± 0,2 versus 1,8 ± 0,2; P = 0,042) y 12 horas (1,2 ± 0,2 versus 1,8 ± 0,2; P = 0,034). El uso equivalentes de morfina por vía oral fue de 10,2 ± 1,4 mg y 16,6 ± 2,5 mg (P = 0,028). Las puntuaciones media y máxima de NRS en los 14 días fueron más bajas para la ropivacaína (i.c. del 95%: 0,14-0,49, P = 0,002 y de 0,39-0,63, P < 0,0001, respectivamente). No hubo morbididad asociada a la inyección. CONCLUSIÓN: Se recomienda asociar el bloqueo perianal a la anestesia general o regional en la cirugía proctológica. Este procedimiento conlleva una reducción del dolor, una menor necesidad de opioides y una recuperación más rápida con efectos adversos escasos.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Recto/cirugía , Ropivacaína/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Canal Anal , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 35(2): 233-238, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31823052

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The ideal location of specimen extraction in laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery is still debatable. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of incisional hernias and surgical site infections in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection for recurrent sigmoid diverticulitis by performing specimen extraction through left lower transverse incision or Pfannenstiel-Kerr incision. METHODS: A total of 269 patients operated between January 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively screened for inclusion in the study. Patients with specimen extraction through left lower transverse incision (LLT) and patients with specimen extraction through Pfannenstiel-K incision (P-K) were matched in 1:1 proportion regarding age, sex, comorbidities, and previous abdominal surgery. The incidence of incisional hernias and surgical site infections were compared by using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: After matching 77 patients in the LLT group and 77 patients in the P-K group, they were found to be homogenous regarding the above mentioned descriptive characteristics. No patients in the P-K group developed an incisional hernia compared with 10 patients (13%) in the LLT group (p = 0.001). All these patients required hernia repair with mesh augmentation. The rate of surgical site infections was 1/77 in the P-K group and 0/77 in the LLT group (p = 1.0). In the P-K group, a wound protector was used in 86% of patients whereas in the LLT group, 39% of the wounds were protected during specimen extraction (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The Pfannenstiel-Kerr incision may be the preferred extraction site compared with the left lower transverse incision given the significant reduction of the risk of incisional hernias.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Hernia Abdominal/epidemiología , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Anciano , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Hernia Abdominal/prevención & control , Humanos , Incidencia , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Suiza/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Int J Surg ; 2024 Oct 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39453984

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Standardisation has the potential to serve as a measure to mitigate complication rates. The objective was to assess the impact of standardisation by implementing a colorectal bundle (CB), which comprises nine elements, on the complication rates in left-sided colorectal resections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, observational, cohort trial was conducted in Switzerland at nine participating hospitals. During the control period, each patient was treated in accordance with the local standard protocol at their respective hospital. In the CB period, all patients were treated in accordance with the CB. The primary endpoint was the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 1141 patients were included (723 in the No CB group and 418 in the CB group). Median age was 66 years and 50.6% were female. Median CCI before and after CB implementation was 0.0 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 0.0-20.9). A hurdle model approach was used for the analysis. The CB was not associated with the presence or severity of complications. Older age (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% Confidence Intervall [CI]: 1.00-1.03), surgery for malignancy (OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.92), emergency surgery (OR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.31-3.41), elevated nutritional risk score (OR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.24) and Body-Mass Index (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.06) were associated with higher odds of postoperative complications. In a supplementary per-protocol analysis, for each additional item of the CB fulfilled, the odds of anastomotic leakage (AL) were 24% lower (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated teams can establish high quality colorectal services in a network of hospitals with a joint standard. The study can serve as a model for other healthcare settings to conduct and implement quality improvement programs. The consistent implementation of the CB items can reduce the occurrence of AL.

5.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 394(6): 1005-10, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19084990

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We investigated routinely the bile ducts by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP) prior to cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to analyze the rate of clinically inapparent common bile duct (CBD) stones, the predictive value of elevated liver enzymes for CBD stones, and the influence of the radiological results on the perioperative management. METHODS: In this prospective study, 465 patients were cholecystectomized within 18 months, mainly laparoscopically. Preoperative MRCP was performed in 454 patients. RESULTS: With MRCP screening, clinically silent CBD stones were found in 4%. Elevated liver enzymes have only a poor predictive value for the presence of CBD stones (positive predictive value, 21%; negative predictive value, 96%). Compared to the recent literature, the postoperative morbidity in this study was low (0 bile duct injury, 0.4% residual gallstones). CONCLUSIONS: Although MRCP is diagnostically useful in the perioperative management in some cases, its routine use in the DRG-era may not be justified due to the costs.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatocolangiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis/diagnóstico , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Coledocolitiasis/metabolismo , Estudios de Cohortes , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Femenino , Cálculos Biliares/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Transaminasas/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Chirurg ; 79(11): 1077-9, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17891360

RESUMEN

A young male patient presented with right lower quadrant abdominal pain 3 years after laparoscopic appendectomy. Clinical and radiological findings were in keeping with acute appendicitis and the diagnosis of stump appendicitis could be confirmed by laparoscopy. This case serves as a reminder of this differential diagnosis and to discuss therapy and prevention of this rare condition.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Peritonitis/diagnóstico , Peritonitis/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Adulto , Humanos , Enfermedades del Íleon/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Íleon/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Peritonitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Recurrencia , Reoperación
7.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 16(6): 557-61, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17243869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the outcome of antireflux surgery, we assessed disease-specific symptoms and quality of life of all patients treated by laparoscopic fundoplication at our center between 1992 and 2002. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative symptoms and details of surgery were evaluated for 186 laparoscopic fundoplications. Disease-specific symptoms and quality of life were assessed using a questionnaire. Of 186 patients, 143 returned the questionnaire. RESULTS: The most common preoperative symptoms under medical antireflux therapy were regurgitation (54%) and heartburn (30%). Indications for surgery were refractory symptoms (88%) and the patient denying long-term medication (42%). The surgical approaches were Nissen fundoplication (98%) or Toupet fundoplication (2%, for heavy esophageal motility disorder). The conversion rate was 10%. There were no deaths, and 6 patients (3%) had to be reoperated. The questionnaire revealed that in 82% of the patients who responded, the preoperative reflux symptoms were gone, and 94% were satisfied with the result and would undergo surgery again. The average gastrointestinal quality of life index was 115 points (healthy volunteers in the literature, 120.8 points). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic fundoplication is a safe antireflux therapy resulting in high levels of patient satisfaction and near-normal quality of life in the long term.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Obes Surg ; 15(7): 1050-4, 2005 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16105406

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Slippage occurs after 2-18% of gastric bandings performed by the perigastric technique (PGT). We investigated the slippage-rate before and after the introduction of the pars flaccida technique (PFT) and the 11-cm Lap-Band, and the long-term results of the re-operated patients. METHODS: Between Dec 1996 and Feb 2004, 360 patients with a mean BMI of 44 kg/m2 were operated. The PGT (n=168) and PFT9.75 (n=15) groups received the 9.75-cm Lap-Band, and the PFT11 group (n=177) received the new 11-cm Lap-Band. Follow-up rate was 99%. RESULTS: Slippage occurred in a total of 31 patients from all groups (PGT, n=28, or 17%; PFT9.75, n=1, or 7%; PFT11, n=2, or 1%). Average yearly re-operation rate for slippage in the first 3 years postoperatively was 3.8%, 2.2% and 0.9%, respectively. Laparoscopic re-banding was necessary for posterior (n=19) or lateral (n=12) slippage. The late postoperative course after re-banding was: uneventful 58%, weight regain 35% and/or esophageal motility disorder 23%, secondary band intolerance 20%, and one persistent posterior slippage. 8 patients (26%) needed biliopancreatic diversion. CONCLUSION: Since the introduction of the PFT and the 11-cm Lap-Band, we observed a significant reduction in slippage rate and no posterior slippage. Re-banding had a less favorable long-term result than did first-procedure banding.


Asunto(s)
Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/prevención & control , Gastroplastia/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Gastroplastia/instrumentación , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Falla de Prótesis , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Chirurg ; 76(3): 263-9, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15502891

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: We studied developments in indication, operation time, conversion rate, morbidity, and mortality from the beginning of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Between 1990 and 2002 we prospectively evaluated 4498 patients undergoing cholecystectomy (CE), of whom 79% were treated laparoscopically (lap). In 6.6%, the procedure had to be converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy (con), and 14% were performed open from the beginning (open). During the above time period, the rate of open CE decreased steadily (49% in 1990 to 7.2% in 2002). The average operation time of lap CE remained constant with an average of 74 min (range 20-330). The conversion rate decreased in spite of broader indication for lap CE in even more complicated gallstone diseases, from an initial 9.4% to 2.5%. Among intraoperative complications in lap and con, bile duct lesions remained constant with 5/3856 (0.1%), bleeding which led to conversion decreased from 1.9% to 0.3%, and the rate of gall bladder perforation increased from 12% to 20.5%. Thirty-day morbidity was 2% in lap CE, 5% in con, and 11.5% in open. The mortality was 0% in lap, 0.7% in con, and 1% in open. CONCLUSION: Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy the indication for this minimal-invasive operation steadily increased, the conversion-rate decreased and the complication-rate could be held low. Even with fast laparoscopic experience 7% of all cholecystectomies are technically difficult and remain to be carried out primarily in an open technique. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard in the therapy of gallstone disease.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Colecistitis/cirugía , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux , Conductos Biliares/lesiones , Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Causas de Muerte , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/educación , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación Médica Continua , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemobilia/diagnóstico , Hemobilia/cirugía , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adherencias Tisulares , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Arch Surg ; 132(9): 1038-42, 1997 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9301620

RESUMEN

The ileocecal interpositional graft is an alternative method for replacing the distal esophagus and the stomach. A pedunculated ileocecal interpositional graft rotated 180 degrees clock-wise and placed across the hiatus between the proximal esophagus and the duodenum could act as a reservoir and protect against reflux (ileocecal valve) while preserving the duodenal passage. Two patients underwent this operation (the first patient has been observed for 12 postoperative months). We also used this technique to replace the stomach alone below the diaphragm, a technique that had been abandoned in the surgical literature since 1952, although the concept and initial experiences were already promising at that time. In favor of these attractive features of the ileocecal interpositional graft as gastric replacement, we have begun a controlled examination of this method.


Asunto(s)
Esofagectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Válvula Ileocecal/trasplante , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Apendicectomía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esplenectomía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura
11.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 3(4): 383-8, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10482690

RESUMEN

Mainly because of the loss of reservoir function, loss of sphincter function, and exclusion of the duodenal route, patients who undergo gastrectomy suffer from many adverse effects postoperatively. The ileocecal interpositional graft is an attractive method to use as a gastric substitute after gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy. A pedunculated ileocecal graft is placed between the esophagus and the duodenum. The cecum acts as a reservoir while the ileocecal valve protects against enteroesophageal reflux. The duodenal passage is also preserved. Fourteen patients underwent this operation. The technique-related morbidity was low and the quality of life was good. During a mean follow-up of 6 months, no evidence of severe dumping syndrome or reflux esophagitis was observed. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted to compare this technique with the standard methods of gastric reconstruction.


Asunto(s)
Colon/trasplante , Esofagectomía , Gastrectomía , Íleon/trasplante , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Ciego/trasplante , Síndrome de Vaciamiento Rápido/prevención & control , Duodeno/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagitis Péptica/prevención & control , Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/prevención & control , Humanos , Válvula Ileocecal/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 19(5): 469-73, 1993 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8405484

RESUMEN

Perianal (extramammary) Paget's disease is rare and corresponds to an intraepithelial adenocarcinoma arising from dermal apocrine sweat glands. Biopsy reveals the diagnosis. The condition is often associated with an underlying malignancy (carcinoma of the apocrine or eccrine glands, rectal carcinoma, anal carcinoma). Wide local excision is recommended when invasive growth is absent. For invasive cancer or when associated with a synchronous malignancy abdomino-perineal resection is the treatment of choice. Two cases of perianal Paget's disease are presented.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Ano/cirugía , Enfermedad de Paget Extramamaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Paget Extramamaria/cirugía , Anciano , Neoplasias del Ano/diagnóstico , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Paget Extramamaria/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Piel
13.
Am J Surg ; 172(4): 335-40, 1996 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8873525

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Total rectal resection is the radical treatment method for radiation proctitis complications. Park's straight colo-anal reconstruction to replace the rectum often impairs anal continence, increases stool frequency, and causes imperative urgency. We developed and assessed a colo-anal reconstruction (ileocecal reservoir) after resection of radiation-damaged rectum. METHODS: An ileocecal segment was isolated on its lymphovascular pedicel, rotated counterclockwise, and reanastomosed at the dentate line. This provided a neorectal segment with intact intrinsic and extrinsic nerve and lymphovascular supply. We evaluated the safety, defecation quality, and anorectal function of this neorectum in two radiation-injured patients when compared with 15 patients after total mesorectal excision without radiation damage. RESULTS: No perioperative morbidity related to this technique was observed. Neorectal patients showed good defecation quality with maximal tolerable volumes, compliances, and anal manometry comparable with patients without radiation injury. CONCLUSIONS: This rectal replacement technique permits good defecation quality and excellent anorectal function.


Asunto(s)
Proctitis/cirugía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Traumatismos por Radiación/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Defecación/fisiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proctitis/complicaciones , Proctitis/fisiopatología , Traumatismos por Radiación/fisiopatología , Neoplasias del Recto/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 131(7-8): 99-103, 2001 Feb 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11416885

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most patients with chronic peptic ulcer disease have Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. In the past, immediate acid-reduction surgery has been strongly advocated for perforated peptic ulcers because of the high incidence of ulcer relapse after simple closure. Simple oversewing procedures either by an open or laparoscopic approach together with H. pylori eradication appear to supersede definitive ulcer surgery. METHODS: In 47 consecutive patients (mean age = 64 years, range 27-91) suffering from acute peptic ulcer perforation the preoperative presence of H. pylori (CLO test), the surgical procedure (laparoscopy or open surgery), the outcome of surgery, and the success of H. pylori eradication with a triple regimen were prospectively studied. RESULTS: Of these patients 73.3% were positive for H. pylori, regardless of the previous use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Thirty-eight per cent underwent a simple laparoscopic repair. Conversion rate to laparotomy reached a high of 32%. The main reasons for conversion were the size of the ulcer, and/or diffuse peritonitis for a duration of over 12 hours with fibrous membranes difficult to remove laparoscopically. In the H. pylori positive patients, eradication was successful in 96% of the cases. Mortality and morbidity rates were greater in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.05). Follow-up (median 43.5 months) revealed no need for reoperation for peptic ulcer disease and no mortality. CONCLUSION: We have found a high prevalence of H. pylori infection in patients with perforated peptic ulcers. An immediate and appropriate H. pylori eradication therapy for perforated peptic ulcers reduces the relapse rate after simple closure. Response rate to a triple eradication protocol was excellent in the hospital setting.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Úlcera Duodenal/diagnóstico , Úlcera Duodenal/terapia , Duodenoscopía , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Gastroscopía , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Úlcera Gástrica/diagnóstico , Úlcera Gástrica/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suiza/epidemiología
15.
Chirurg ; 68(6): 643-5, 1997 Jun.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9324447

RESUMEN

Failure to find the gallbladder at the usual or most common atypical sites during surgery for cholecystolithiasis is a rare but known problem. Although ultrasonography has 95% sensitivity for the diagnosis of cholelithiasis, occasionally a small contracted gallbladder with stones and chronic cholecystitis will be difficult to visualize and can lead to erroneous interpretation. We report on the case of a patient presenting with abdominal colic and ultrasonographically confirmed cholecystolithiasis. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the gallbladder could not be detected. After laparoscopic staging followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and abdominal computed tomography, agenesis of the gallbladder was confirmed. This method can be considered for diagnosis of gallbladder agenesis without the need for laparotomy and thorough exploration.


Asunto(s)
Vesícula Biliar/anomalías , Laparoscopía , Adulto , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colelitiasis/diagnóstico , Colelitiasis/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Vesícula Biliar/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía
16.
Chirurg ; 69(12): 1376-7, 1998 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10023566

RESUMEN

The hand-sutured coloanal anastomosis requires adequate and atraumatic exposure of the anal canal in order to avoid sphincter damage. We evaluated a new modified anal retractor to improve exposure of the anal canal and thread handling during construction of hand-sutured coloanal anastomosis. This new device was used during all coloanal and transperineal procedures performed in 1997 in our hospital. This new device is safe and extremely comfortable for the surgeon. It speeds up the procedure and keeps sutures out of the way when completing a coloanal anastomosis.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos
17.
Chirurg ; 70(5): 552-61, 1999 May.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10412599

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The choice of the best reconstruction technique following resection of either the stomach or the rectum remains a matter of discussion. While there is no problem in reconnecting intestinal segments, which do not serve as a reservoir, there are many different operation techniques to replace the stomach and rectum, producing significantly different functional results. The ileocecal segment offers an excellent intestinal reservoir combined with an antireflux mechanism, thus presenting an ideal replacement for the stomach. For replacement of the rectal reservoir as well, the ileocecal segment may be used in the first line of treatment. METHOD: The ileocecal segment was used in 20 patients following gastric resection and lymphadenectomy to reconstruct the intestinal passage between the esophagus and the duodenal stump (group A). In some further 44 patients (group B) the ileocecal segment was used to replace the rectum between the descending colon and the dentate line following resection for very low-grade rectal cancer. Mortality and morbidity were investigated in both groups. In group A quality of life, weight loss, dumping and reflux symptoms were evaluated. In group B continence, discrimination, defecation quality, urge and the patient satisfaction were investigated. All data were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Early and late mortality were not different compared to other reconstruction types. In each group one patient died within 60 days postoperatively due to myocardial infarction. The morbidity following stomach replacement was 20%, following rectal replacement 4.6% during hospitalization and 13.8% during follow-up, respectively. One patient complained about heartburn, but endoscopically no pathology was detected in any patient. Three months postoperatively the patients' weight remained stable or started to increase. Three months following rectal replacement 87% of the patients were continent with further improvement over 2 years. Soiling mainly during the night remained over 2 years in 44%. 88% of the patients were completely satisfied 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The replacement of either the stomach or the rectum using the ileocecal segment with an adequate surgical technique is safe and produces excellent functional outcome regarding the reconstruction of the intestinal passage as well as the reservoir function of the primary organ. Furthermore, preservation of the duodenal passage after gastrectomy may prevent dysregulation of the endocrine and exocrine pancreatic hormones.


Asunto(s)
Ciego/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Estomas Quirúrgicos/fisiología , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Ciego/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incontinencia Fecal/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/prevención & control , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/fisiopatología , Tasa de Supervivencia
18.
Chirurg ; 69(1): 48-54, 1998 Jan.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9522069

RESUMEN

Acute hemorrhage from pseudocysts and pseudoaneurysms is a threatening complication of chronic pancreatitis. Whilst surgical intervention still has high perioperative mortality (16.8%), transcatheter arterial embolization is becoming more frequently used for suitable cases and appears to have lower mortality (6.1%). We report on six patients treated in our unit. Four of them underwent primary surgical treatment, the other two were treated by embolisation. One of the latter patients subsequently required laparotomy for further treatment. All six patients survived. Comparing the literature covering the periods between 1951 and 1981 and between 1982 and 1996, transcatheter embolisation seems to be valuable in controlling this type of bleeding, thereby reducing mortality.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , Seudoquiste Pancreático/cirugía , Adulto , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Falso/mortalidad , Angiografía , Embolización Terapéutica , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Humanos , Ligadura , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatectomía , Seudoquiste Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Seudoquiste Pancreático/mortalidad , Pancreatoyeyunostomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia
19.
Ther Umsch ; 60(3): 165-73, 2003 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12693320

RESUMEN

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are specific inflammatory bowel diseases. Quality of life can be considerably limited. It does not depend on the form of therapy that Crohn's disease is highly recurrent, whereas colitis ulcerosa is curable by proctocolectomy. For both forms of disease surgery is an important option. It has to be included early in the therapy concept and not as last choice. Quality of life in patients with Crohn's disease can be raised significantly by surgery. Meticulous selection of the patients are essential to the policy of surgery as well as a regular aftercare. Best profit for those patients are treatment with an interdisciplinary team, consisting of gastroenterologists, nutrition advisers, psychologists, surgeons and radiologists.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Reservorios Cólicos , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Ileostomía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Colitis/cirugía , Humanos , Ileítis/cirugía , Mucosa Intestinal/cirugía , Selección de Paciente , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Factores de Tiempo
20.
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA