Arginase inhibition improves endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus despite intensive glucose-lowering therapy.

BACKGROUND: Arginase is implicated in the pathogenesis behind endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by its inhibition of nitric oxide formation. Strict glycaemic control is not sufficient to improve endothelial function or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with T2DM, thus other treatment strategies are needed. We hypothesized that arginase inhibition improves endothelial function beyond glucose-lowering therapy following glucose optimization in patients with poorly controlled T2DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Endothelial function was evaluated in 16 patients with poorly controlled T2DM (visit 1) and 16 age-matched controls using venous occlusion plethysmography. T2DM patients were re-evaluated (visit 2) after intensive glucose-lowering regimen. Endothelium-dependent (EDV) and -independent (EIDV) vasodilatations were evaluated before and after 120 min intra-arterial infusion of the arginase inhibitor N(ω)-hydroxy-nor-L-arginine (nor-NOHA). HbA1c was reduced from 87 ± 17 (visit 1) to 65 ± 11 mmol mol-1 (visit 2, P < 0.001). Basal EDV, but not EIDV, was significantly lower in patients with T2DM than in healthy subjects (P < 0.05). EDV and EIDV were unaffected by glucose-lowering regimen in patients with T2DM. Arginase inhibition enhanced EDV in T2DM patients both at visit 1 and visit 2 (P < 0.01). There was no difference in improvement in EDV between the two occasions. EIDV was unaltered by nor-NOHA in T2DM at visit 1, but was slightly improved at visit 2. CONCLUSIONS: Arginase inhibition improves endothelial function in patients with poorly controlled T2DM, which is maintained following glucose optimization. Thus, arginase inhibition is a promising therapeutic target beyond glucose lowering for improving endothelial function in T2DM patients.

Intrathecal adenosine does not relieve allodynia-like behavior in spinally injured rats.

The intrathecal (i.t.) administration of the adenosine A1-receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyl-adenosine (R-PIA) reduced pain-related behaviors after peripheral nerve or spinal cord injury in rats. The endogenous ligand adenosine is clinically available and has been tested i.t. as an analgesic. Thus, we set out to investigate whether i.t. adenosine could reduce allodynia in a model of central pain in spinally injured rats. I.t. adenosine did not reduce mechanical and cold allodynia-like behaviors at doses of 10, 100 and 187 nmol, whereas i.t. R-PIA at 10 nmol markedly alleviated allodynia in the same animals. The lack of effect by exogenous adenosine may be due to pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic reasons. Alternatively, adenosine may have reduced affinity and selectivity towards the A1-receptors which may be important for the antiallodynic effect.

Effects of intrathecal morphine, baclofen, clonidine and R-PIA on the acute allodynia-like behaviours after spinal cord ischaemia in rats.

The present study assessed the efficacy and potency of intrathecal (i.t.) administration of the opiate morphine, the gamma-aminobutyric acid-B (GABA(B)) receptor agonist baclofen, the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine and the adenosine A1-receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyl-adenosine (R-PIA) on the acute allodynia-like behaviour after photochemically induced spinal cord injury (SCI) in rats. Rats displaying allodynia-like behaviours to brushing, von Frey hairs and cold stimulation 1-2 days after photochemically induced SCI were studied. In a cumulative dose regime, morphine (0.1-10 micrcog), baclofen (0.1-1 microg), clonidine (0.1-10 microg) and R-PIA (0.01-10 nmol) were administered i.t. through an implanted catheter at the lumbar spinal cord. All tested drugs dose-dependently reduced the brushing, von Frey hairs and cold stimulation-induced allodynia-like behaviour. No increase in adverse effects such as motor deficits was found for morphine, clonidine and R-PIA. There was a slight increase in motor impairments at the highest dose of baclofen. For the mechanical allodynia, morphine appeared to be most effective, whereas baclofen, clonidine and R-PIA only provided a partial alleviation. For the cold allodynia, morphine and baclofen were more effective than clonidine and R-PIA. In relieving acute mechanical and cold allodynia-like behaviours in rats 1-2 days after SCI, i.t. morphine and baclofen were superior to clonidine and R-PIA.

Intrathecal administration of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyl adenosine reduces presumed pain behaviour in a rat model of central pain.

Effects of intrathecally (i.t.) administered R-phenylisopropyl adenosine (R-PIA), an adenosine A1 receptor agonist, on presumed pain behaviour were assessed in a rat model of chronic central pain. Spinal cord injury was induced photochemically via laser irradiation of the spinal cord after intravenous injection of erythrosin B in rats. The chronic allodynia-like behaviour that developed in some animals was studied. R-PIA (3 and 10 nmol), injected i.t. reduced the mechanical and cold allodynia-like symptoms as tested with von Frey filaments and ethyl-chloride spray, respectively. No side effects were observed. The effect of R-PIA was significant for up to 5 h and was reversed by theophylline, an adenosine receptor antagonist.

Accuracy of continuous nocturnal glucose screening after 48 and 72 hours in type 2 diabetes patients on combined oral and insulin therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of nocturnal continuous glucose monitoring by CGMS. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A CGMS was inserted in 14 type 2 diabetic patients on combined oral and insulin therapy at altogether 15 occasions. During the second (48 hours) and third (72 hours) night of registration each subject was observed and plasma glucose was analysed seven times during the night by venous sampling and compared to CGMS. These venous values were not used for calibration of the sensor. Pairs of data were analysed using correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman graphs and Clarke Error Grid analysis. RESULTS: 32% of CGMS data did not meet the quality criteria for optimal accuracy and were excluded. A correlation coefficient of 0.80 (p < 0.0001) was seen after 48 hours and a lower coefficient of 0.33 (p = 0.0082) after 72 hours. Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated that the dispersion of the values around the mean of differences was wider after 72 hours as compared to after 48 hours. In the Clark Error Grid analysis 100% of data were within zones A and B after 48 hours, with 60% in zone A. After 72 hours only 44% were in zone A and 7% of data were in the clinically unacceptable zone D. CONCLUSION: The MiniMed Medtronic CGMS has acceptable nocturnal accuracy after 48 hours of registration, but the accuracy thereafter deteriorates with time, implicating that the CGMS thereafter may prove less useful for nocturnal monitoring.

Marked enhancement of anti-allodynic effect by combined intrathecal administration of the adenosine A1-receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyladenosine and morphine in a rat model of central pain.

BACKGROUND: There is often no satisfactory treatment for chronic pain after spinal cord injury. We have previously reported that intrathecal (i.t.) administration of the adenosine A1-receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyl-adenosine (R-PIA) or the opioid morphine has anti-allodynic effects in a model of presumed chronic central pain after photochemically induced spinal cord injury in rats. In the present study, we set out to investigate the possible interaction between i.t. R-PIA and morphine in spinally injured rats. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats displaying allodynia-like behaviors to mechanical and cold stimuli after photochemically induced spinal cord injury with minor motor deficits were used. R-PIA and morphine, either alone or in combination, were administered i.t. through an implanted catheter to lumbar spinal cord. RESULTS: Cumulative doses of R-PIA or morphine dose-dependently reduced the mechanical allodynia-like behavior, with a threshold of 1 nmol and 1.5 nmol, respectively. When co-administrated, R-PIA and morphine produced marked suppression of mechanical allodynia at doses of 5 pmol and 7.5 pmol, respectively. The effect of i.t. co-administration of R-PIA and morphine on cold allodynia was comparable to i.t. R-PIA alone. The combination of R-PIA and morphine did not increase adverse effects such as motor deficits in comparison to either drug alone. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate a supra-additive interaction between the adenosine A1-receptor agonist R-PIA and morphine to reduce mechanical allodynia-like behavior in rats with chronic spinal cord injury. The combination of R-PIA and morphine administered spinally may be superior to R-PIA or morphine alone for treating such pain.

Reduced anti-allodynic effect of the adenosine A1-receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyladenosine on repeated intrathecal administration and lack of cross-tolerance with morphine in a rat model of central pain.

UNLABELLED: We examined the development of tolerance to the antiallodynic effect of chronic intrathecal (IT) administration of the adenosine analog R-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) in a rat model of central pain after ischemic spinal cord injury. After 10 days of IT R-PIA treatment, the effect of IT morphine was also assessed to examine whether cross-tolerance between R-PIA and morphine was present. IT R-PIA completely alleviated allodynia-like behaviors to mechanical and cold stimuli in spinally injured rats. The anti-allodynic effect of R-PIA was maintained for 6-7 days with twice-daily administration and was reduced thereafter, particularly with respect to cold allodynia. IT morphine alleviated mechanical and cold allodynia in rats rendered tolerant to R-PIA to a degree comparable to that in R-PIA-naive (control) rats, which indicates that the anti-allodynic property of R-PIA is independent of the mechanisms by which morphine acts. The possibility of using agonists of adenosine receptors in treating refractory pain in patients with spinal cord injury is discussed. IMPLICATIONS: There is often no satisfactory treatment for chronic pain after spinal cord injury. Our study suggests such pain can be treated with a spinal injection of R-phenylisopropyladenosine in rats. Reduced effect to R-phenylisopropyladenosine was noted with repeated administrations. However, there was no cross-tolerance to morphine.