Reaching the target dose with one single 131 I-mIBG administration in high-risk neuroblastoma: The determinant impact of the primary tumour.

BACKGROUND: 131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131 I-mIBG) effectiveness in children with metastasised neuroblastoma (NB) is linked to the effective dose absorbed by the target; a target of 4 Gy whole-body dose threshold has been proposed. Achieving this dose often requires administering 131 I-mIBG twice back-to-back, which may cause haematological toxicity. In this study, we tried identifying the factors predicting the achievement of 4 Gy whole-body dose with a single radiopharmaceutical administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children affected by metastatic NB and treated with a high 131 I-mIBG activity (>450 MBq (megabecquerel)/kg) were evaluated retrospectively. Kinetics measurements were carried out at multiple time points to estimate the whole-body dose, which was compared with clinical and activity-related parameters. RESULTS: Seventeen children (12 females, median age 3 years, age range: 1.5-6.9 years) were included. Eleven of them still bore the primary tumour. The median whole-body dose was 2.88 Gy (range: 1.63-4.22 Gy). Children with a 'bulky' primary (>30 mL) received a higher whole-body dose than those with smaller or surgically removed primaries (3.42 ± 0.74 vs. 2.48 ± 0.65 Gy, respectively, p = .016). Conversely, the correlation between activity/kg and the whole-body dose was moderate (R: 0.42, p = .093). In the multivariate analysis, the volume of the primary tumour was the most relevant predictor of the whole-body dose (p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the presence of a bulky primary tumour can significantly prolong the 131 I-mIBG biological half-life, effectively increasing the absorbed whole-body dose. This information could be used to model the administered activity, allowing to attain the target dose without needing a two-step radiopharmaceutical administration.

Norepinephrine transporter and vesicular monoamine transporter 2 tumor expression as a predictor of response to 131 I-MIBG in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest that norepinephrine transporter (NET) and vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) mediate meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) uptake and retention in neuroblastoma tumors. We evaluated the relationship between NET and VMAT2 tumor expression and clinical response to 131 I-MIBG therapy in patients with neuroblastoma. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to evaluate NET and VMAT2 protein expression levels on archival tumor samples (obtained at diagnosis or relapse) from patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma treated with 131 I-MIBG. A composite protein expression H-score was determined by multiplying a semi-quantitative intensity value (0-3+) by the percentage of tumor cells expressing the protein. RESULTS: Tumor samples and clinical data were available for 106 patients, of whom 28.3% had partial response (PR) or higher. NET H-score was not significantly associated with response (≥PR), though the percentage of tumor cells expressing NET was lower among responders (median 80% for ≥PR vs. 90% for

Phase II study of 131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine with 5 days of topotecan for refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma: Results of the French study MIITOP.

PURPOSE: We report the results of the French multicentric phase II study MIITOP (NCT00960739), which evaluated tandem infusions of 131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) and topotecan in children with relapsed/refractory metastatic neuroblastoma (NBL). METHODS: Patients received 131 I-mIBG on day 1, with intravenous topotecan daily on days 1-5. A second activity of 131 I-mIBG was given on day 21 to deliver a whole-body radiation dose of 4 Gy, combined with a second course of topotecan on days 21-25. Peripheral blood stem cells were infused on day 31. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled from November 2008 to June 2015. Median age at diagnosis was 5.5 years (2-20). Twenty-one had very high-risk NBL (VHR-NBL), that is, stage 4 NBL at diagnosis or at relapse, with insufficient response (i.e., less than a partial response of metastases and more than three mIBG spots) after induction chemotherapy; nine had progressive metastatic relapse. Median Curie score at inclusion was 6 (1-26). Median number of prior lines of treatment was 3 (1-7). Objective response rate was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4-31) for the whole population, 19% for VHR-NBL, and 0% for progressive relapses. Immediate tolerance was good, with nonhematologic toxicity limited to grade-2 nausea/vomiting in eight patients. Two-year event-free survival was 17% (95% CI: 6-32). Among the 16 patients with VHR-NBL who had not received prior myeloablative busulfan-melphalan consolidation, 13 had at least stable disease after MIITOP; 11 subsequently received busulfan-melphalan; four of them were alive (median follow-up: 7 years). CONCLUSION: MIITOP showed acceptable tolerability in this heavily pretreated population and encouraging survival rates in VHR-NBL when followed by busulfan-melphalan.

Phase I/II clinical trial of high-dose [131I] meta-iodobenzylguanidine therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma preceding single myeloablative chemotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: Paediatric high-risk neuroblastoma has poor prognosis despite modern multimodality therapy. This phase I/II study aimed to determine the safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and efficacy of high-dose 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) therapy combined with single high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in high-risk neuroblastoma in Japan. METHODS: Patients received 666 MBq/kg of 131I-mIBG and single HDC and HSCT from autologous or allogeneic stem cell sources. The primary endpoint was DLT defined as adverse events associated with 131I-mIBG treatment posing a significant obstacle to subsequent HDC. The secondary endpoints were adverse events/reactions, haematopoietic stem cell engraftment and responses according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. Response was evaluated after engraftment. RESULTS: We enrolled eight patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (six females; six newly diagnosed and two relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma; median age, 4 years; range, 1-10 years). Although all patients had adverse events/reactions after high-dose 131I-mIBG therapy, we found no DLT. Adverse events and reactions were observed in 100% and 25% patients during single HDC and 100% and 12.5% patients during HSCT, respectively. No Grade 4 complications except myelosuppression occurred during single HDC and HSCT. The response rate according to RECIST 1.1 was observed in 87.5% (7/8) in stable disease and 12.5% (1/8) were not evaluated. Scintigraphic response occurred in 62.5% (5/8) and 37.5% (3/8) patients in complete response and stable disease, respectively. CONCLUSION: 131I-mIBG therapy with 666 MBq/kg followed by single HDC and autologous or allogeneic SCT is safe and efficacious in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma and has no DLT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs041180030. NAME OF REGISTRY: Feasibility of high-dose iodine-131-meta-iodobenzylguanidine therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma preceding myeloablative chemotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (High-dose iodine-131-meta-iodobenzylguanidine therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma). URL OF REGISTRY: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs041180030 . DATE OF ENROLMENT OF THE FIRST PARTICIPANT TO THE TRIAL: 12/01/2018.

The efficacy and safety of Iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy in patients with neuroblastoma: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Neuroblastoma is a common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. Recently, multiple treatments have been practiced including Iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine radiation (131I-MIBG) therapy. However, the outcomes of efficacy and safety vary greatly among different studies. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 131I-MIBG in the treatment of neuroblastoma and to provide evidence and hints for clinical decision-making. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE database and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. Eligible studies utilizing 131I-MIBG in the treatment of neuroblastoma were included. The pooled outcomes (response rates, adverse events rates, survival rates) were calculated using either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model considering of the heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 26 clinical trials including 883 patients were analyzed. The pooled rates of objective response, stable disease, progressive disease, and minor response of 131I-MIBG monotherapy were 39%, 31%, 22% and 15%, respectively. The pooled objective response rate of 131I-MIBG in combination with other therapies was 28%. The pooled 1-year survival and 5-year survival rates were 64% and 32%. The pooled occurrence rates of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in MIBG monotherapy studies were 53% and 58%. In the studies of 131I-MIBG combined with other therapies, the pooled occurrence rates of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were 79% and 78%. CONCLUSION: 131I-MIBG treatment alone or in combination of other therapies is effective on clinical outcomes in the treatment of neuroblastoma, individualized 131I-MIBG is recommended on a clinical basis.

Feasibility and effectiveness of treatment strategy of tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in combination with 131 I-MIBG therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma.

This study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tandem HDCT/ASCT combined with targeted radiotherapy using 131 I-MIBG for high-risk neuroblastoma. Patients with high-risk neuroblastoma were treated with 8 to 10 cycles of induction chemotherapy before tandem HDCT/ASCT. Patients received 131 I-MIBG treatment before the second HDCT/ASCT. Local radiotherapy and maintenance therapy were performed after tandem HDCT/ASCT. Between 2012 and 2016, 19 patients were diagnosed with high-risk neuroblastoma in our institution and 18 of them received tandem HDCT/ASCT combined with 131 I-MIBG therapy. For the first HDCT/ASCT regimen, 12 patients received busulfan/melphalan and six patients received melphalan/etoposide/carboplatin. The second HDCT included ThioCy. The median dose of 131 I-MIBG was 17.2 mCi/kg for the first eight patients, while 12 patients in the latter period of the study received reduced dose of 10.7 mCi/kg. The 5-year OS and EFS rates were 79% and 61%, respectively, for all 19 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, and 83% and 64%, respectively, for 18 patients who completed tandem HDCT/ASCT combined with 131 I-MIBG therapy. Six patients experienced disease relapse and five patients died. Treatment-related mortality was not observed. Among 15 evaluable patients, 11 patients (73%) developed hypothyroidism, six patients (40%) had CKD, and six patients (40%) had growth failure. Hypothyroidism and growth failure were less frequent in patients who received reduced doses of 131 I-MIBG therapy. Tandem HDCT/ASCT combined with HD 131 I-MIBG therapy could be feasible for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma with acceptable toxicity profiles and favorable outcomes.

Dosimetry-based high-activity therapy with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) and topotecan for the treatment of high-risk refractory neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: Patients with high-risk neuroblastoma have an increased risk of recurrence and relapse of disease and a very poor prognosis. 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) in combination with topotecan as a radiosensitizer can be an effective and relatively well-tolerated agent for the treatment of refractory neuroblastoma. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate response and outcome of combined therapy with 131I-mIBG and topotecan. METHODS: Ten patients, between 3 and 20 years of age, were included. Nine patients had been refractory to several lines of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. One patient with a very high-risk neuroblastoma had received only induction therapy. Response was graded according to the International Neuroblastoma Staging System. RESULTS: Regarding treatment response, two patients achieved complete remission, one with relapse at 16 months, five achieved a partial remission, four showed progression at between 1 and 18 months; two showed stable disease with progression at between 1 and 5 months, and one showed progressive disease. Eight of the ten patients died with overall survival between 4 and 63 months, and two patients were still alive without disease at the time of this report: 52 and 32 months (patient had received only induction therapy). Acute and subacute adverse effects were mainly haematological, and one patient developed a differentiated thyroid cancer. CONCLUSION: In patients with high-risk refractory neuroblastoma, administration of high activities of 131I-mIBG in combination with topotecan was found to be an effective therapy, increasing overall survival and progression-free survival. Further studies including a larger number of patients and using 131I-mIBG for first-line up-front therapy are warranted.

The vial kit formulation for preparation of no-carrier-added 131 I-MIBG.

We have developed a new set of lyophilized kits, composed of 3 different kits, for the instant preparation of no-carrier-added 131 I-MIBG in the clinic. We here discussed the formulation of the kits, optimization of radiolabelling, quality control of radiolabeled 131 I-MIBG, and studies of animal biodistribution. The no-carrier-added (nca) 131 I-MIBG injection could be prepared within 30 minutes in the clinic with the help of the lyophilized kits. The radiochemical purity and specific activity (SA) could achieve above 98% and 6700 MBq/mg, respectively.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Treatment and (131)I-MIBG in the management of patients with metastatic/progressive phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Radionuclide therapy has been used to treat patients with progressive/metastatic paragangliomas (PGLs) and phaeochromocytomas (PCCs). The aim of the present study is to retrospectively compare the therapeutic outcomes of these modalities in patients with progressive/metastatic PCCs and PGLs. METHODS: Patients with progressive/metastatic PGLs and PCCs that were subjected to radionuclide treatment in our department were retrieved from our department's database for the period 1998-2013. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), event free survival (EFS), and response to treatment were calculated. Treatment toxicity was documented. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with progressive/metastatic PGLs or PCCs were treated with either (131)I-MIBG, (90)Y-DOTATATE or (177)Lu-DOTATATE. A total of 30 treatments were administered (16 treatments with (131)I-MIBG, 2 with (177)Lu-DOTATATE, and 12 with (90)Y-DOTATATE. Patients treated with PRRT had increased PFS and response to treatment compared to (131)I-MIBG treated patients (P < 0.05). However, difference in OS was non significant (P = 0.09). There was no difference in major toxicities between groups. When comparing only patients with PGLs, OS, PFS, EFS, and response to treatment were significantly higher in the PRRT treatment group. CONCLUSION: PRRT treatment offers increased OS, PFS, EFS, and response to treatment compared to (131)I-MIBG therapy in patients with progressive/malignant PGLs.

An evaluation in vitro of PARP-1 inhibitors, rucaparib and olaparib, as radiosensitisers for the treatment of neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: The radiopharmaceutical (131)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine ((131)I-MIBG) is an effective treatment for neuroblastoma. However, maximal therapeutic benefit from (131)I-MIBG is likely to be obtained by its combination with chemotherapy. We previously reported enhanced antitumour efficacy of (131)I-MIBG by inhibition of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) DNA repair pathway using the phenanthridinone derivative PJ34. Recently developed alternative PARP-1 inhibitors have greater target specificity and are expected to be associated with reduced toxicity to normal tissue. Therefore, our purpose was to determine whether the more specific PARP-1 inhibitors rucaparib and olaparib enhanced the efficacy of X-radiation or (131)I-MIBG. METHODS: Radiosensitisation of SK-N-BE(2c) neuroblastoma cells or noradrenaline transporter gene-transfected glioma cells (UVW/NAT) was investigated using clonogenic assay. Propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry was used to analyse cell cycle progression. DNA damage was quantified by the phosphorylation of H2AX (γH2AX). RESULTS: By combining PARP-1 inhibition with radiation treatment, it was possible to reduce the X-radiation dose or (131)I-MIBG activity concentration required to achieve 50 % cell kill by approximately 50 %. Rucaparib and olaparib were equally effective inhibitors of PARP-1 activity. X-radiation-induced DNA damage was significantly increased 2 h after irradiation by combination with PARP-1 inhibitors (10-fold greater DNA damage compared to untreated controls; p < 0.01). Moreover, combination treatment (i) prevented the restitution of DNA, exemplified by the persistence of 3-fold greater DNA damage after 24 h, compared to untreated controls (p < 0.01) and (ii) induced greater G2/M arrest (p < 0.05) than either single agent alone. CONCLUSION: Rucaparib and olaparib sensitise cancer cells to X-radiation or (131)I-MIBG treatment. It is likely that the mechanism of radiosensitisation entails the accumulation of unrepaired radiation-induced DNA damage. Our findings suggest that the administration of PARP-1 inhibitors and (131)I-MIBG to high risk neuroblastoma patients may be beneficial.

Use of radioactive substances in diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.

Radionuclides are needed both for nuclear medicine imaging as well as for peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Imaging is important in the initial diagnostic work-up and for staging NETs. In therapy planning, somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) is used when treatment is targeted at the somatostatin receptors as with the use of somatostatin analogues or PRRT. SRI with gamma camera technique using the tracer (111)In-DTPA-octreotide has for many years been the backbone of nuclear imaging of NETs. However, increasingly PET tracers for SRI are now used. (68)Ga-DOTATATE, (68)Ga-DOTATOC and (68)Ga-DOTANOC are the three most often used PET tracers. They perform better than SPECT tracers and should be preferred. FDG-PET is well suited for visualization of most of the somatostatin receptor-negative tumors prognostic in NET patients. Also (11)C-5-HTP, (18)F-DOPA and (123)I-MIBG may be used in NET. However, with FDG-PET and somatostatin receptor PET at hand we see limited necessity of other tracers. PRRT is an important tool in the treatment of advanced NETs causing complete or partial response in 20% and minor response or tumor stabilization in 60% with response duration of up to 3 years. Grade 3-4 kidney or bone marrow toxicity is seen in 1.5% and 9.5%, respectively, but are completely or partly reversible in most patients. (177)Lu-DOTATATE seems to have less toxicity than (90)Y-DOTATOC. However, until now only retrospective, non-randomized studies have been performed and the role of PRRT in treatment of NETs remains to be established.

Aurora Kinase A inhibition enhances DNA damage and tumor cell death with 131I-MIBG therapy in high-risk neuroblastoma.

Background: Neuroblastoma is the most common extra-cranial pediatric solid tumor. 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is a targeted radiopharmaceutical highly specific for neuroblastoma tumors, providing potent radiotherapy to widely metastatic disease. Aurora kinase A (AURKA) plays a role in mitosis and stabilization of the MYCN protein in neuroblastoma. Here we explore whether AURKA inhibition potentiates a response to MIBG therapy. Results: Using an in vivo model of high-risk neuroblastoma, we demonstrated a marked combinatorial effect of 131I-MIBG and alisertib on tumor growth. In MYCN amplified cell lines, the combination of radiation and an AURKA A inhibitor increased DNA damage and apoptosis and decreased MYCN protein levels. Conclusion: The combination of AURKA inhibition with 131I-MIBG treatment is active in resistant neuroblastoma models and is a promising clinical approach in high-risk neuroblastoma.

Aurora Kinase A inhibition enhances DNA damage and tumor cell death with 131I-MIBG therapy in high-risk neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma is the most common extra-cranial pediatric solid tumor. 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is a targeted radiopharmaceutical highly specific for neuroblastoma tumors, providing potent radiotherapy to widely metastatic disease. Aurora kinase A (AURKA) plays a role in mitosis and stabilization of the MYCN protein in neuroblastoma. We aimed to study the impact of AURKA inhibitors on DNA damage and tumor cell death in combination with 131I-MIBG therapy in a pre-clinical model of high-risk neuroblastoma. RESULTS: Using an in vivo model of high-risk neuroblastoma, we demonstrated a marked combinatorial effect of 131I-MIBG and alisertib on tumor growth. In MYCN amplified cell lines, the combination of radiation and an AURKA A inhibitor increased DNA damage and apoptosis and decreased MYCN protein levels. CONCLUSION: The combination of AURKA inhibition with 131I-MIBG treatment is active in resistant neuroblastoma models.

Radio theranostics in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas.

This continuing education aims to present in a clear and easy-to-understand manner the biology of paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas (PPGLs), the functional imaging studies available for their diagnosis and therapeutic planning, the requirements necessary to administer radioligand therapy (RLT) and the characteristics of these treatments (inclusion criteria, administration protocols, adverse effects and future perspectives). In this pathology we have two RLT options: [131I]MIBG and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. The indication for treatment is determined by the expression of its therapeutic target in functional imaging studies, allowing precision and personalized medicine. Although most of the results we have for both treatments have as origin small retrospective series, RLT is presented as a safe and well-tolerated therapeutic option in PPGLs with slow-moderate progression or with uncontrollable symptoms, obtaining high disease control rates.

[A Report on Health Resource Use of Internal Radiation Therapy with 131I-MIBG (2nd Survey)].

Internal radiation therapy using Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) for neuroblastoma has been discussed whether a special application scheme for off-labeled drugs called "Kouchi-Shinsei" could be applied to neuroblastoma or not by the Evaluation Committee on Unapproved or Off-labeled Drug with High Medical Needs (the Committee); if the Committee determines that Kouchi-Shinsei is applicable, neuroblastoma indication is expected to be regulatory approved within a year. Since a NHI medical technical fee is not yet set for neuroblastoma, the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine surveyed health resource use via a questionnaire survey of medical institution that has conducted a Japanese Advanced Medical Care B clinical study in neuroblastoma. Results showed that the necessary total cost per patient is 1,847,451 JPY when calculated based on the Draft Proposal for Medical Examination Value (Ver. 7.3) of the Japanese Health Insurance Federation for Surgery. Because follow-up is necessary for 3 months after administration, it was considered that an appropriate fee per patient is 1,847,451 JPY and an appropriate NHI medical technical fee per patient is 46,186 points which can be claimed up to once a month for 4 times including the initial month of the treatment.

Timing and chemotherapy association for 131-I-MIBG treatment in high-risk neuroblastoma.

Prognosis of high-risk neuroblastoma is dismal, despite intensive induction chemotherapy, surgery, high-dose chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and maintenance. Patients who do not achieve a complete metastatic response, with clearance of bone marrow and skeletal NB infiltration, after induction have a significantly lowersurvival rate. Thus, it's necessary to further intensifytreatment during this phase. 131-I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131-I-MIBG) is a radioactive compound highly effective against neuroblastoma, with32% response rate in relapsed/resistant cases, and only hematological toxicity. 131-I-MIBG wasutilized at different doses in single or multiple administrations, before autologous transplant or combinedwith high-dose chemotherapy. Subsequently, it was added to consolidationin patients with advanced NB after induction, but an independent contribution against neuroblastoma and for myelotoxicity is difficult to determine. Despiteresults of a 2008 paper demonstratedefficacy and mild hematological toxicity of 131-I-MIBG at diagnosis, no center had included it with intensive chemotherapy in first-line treatment protocols. In our institution, at diagnosis, 131-I-MIBG was included in a 5-chemotherapy drug combination and administered on day-10, at doses up to 18.3 mCi/kg. Almost 87% of objective responses were observed 50 days from start with acceptable hematological toxicity. In this paper, we review the literature data regarding 131-I-MIBG treatment for neuroblastoma, and report on doses and combinations used, tumor responses and toxicity. 131-I-MIBG is very effective against neuroblastoma, in particular if given to patients at diagnosis and in combination with chemotherapy, and it should be included in all induction regimens to improve early responses rates and consequently long-term survival.

Prognostic factors for refractory pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma after 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Given the rarity of refractory pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL), outcomes and prognostic factors after 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) treatment still remain unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated whether baseline characteristics at initial 131I-mIBG therapy and imaging response to repeated 131I-mIBG therapy could be prognostic factors for refractory PPGL. METHODS: All patients [n = 59 (male/female = 35/24), median age; 49.3 years] with refractory PPGL who received 131I-mIBG therapy at our institution between September 2009 and September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for the effects of the following factors on overall survival: age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, palpitations, constipation, cancer pain, catecholamines values, past history of therapy (external beam radiation for bone metastasis, operation, and chemotherapy), metastasis sites, and response to 131I-mIBG treatments. RESULTS: Throughout the follow-up period, 18 patients died from disease exacerbation. The estimated 5- and 10-year survival rates were 79.4% and 67.2% from the initial diagnoses of refractory PPGL and 68.5% and 49.9% from the first 131I-mIBG therapy, respectively. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that progressive disease (PD) [hazard ratio (HR) 96.3, P = 0.011] and constipation (HR 8.2, P = 0.024) were adverse prognostic factors for overall survival after initial 131I-mIBG therapy. The log-rank test demonstrated that PD in response to 131I-mIBG therapies (P < 0.0001) and constipation (P < 0.01) were correlated with poor survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: Response to repeated 131I-mIBG treatment can be a strong predictor of prognosis after initial 131I-mIBG therapy for refractory PPGL. Repeated 131I-mIBG therapy may be a good option for controlling refractory PPGL.

Response to targeted radionuclide therapy with [131I]MIBG AND [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE according to adrenal vs. extra-adrenal primary location in metastatic paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas: A systematic review.

Purpose: Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) with [131I]MIBG and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is an alternative treatment to the classic schemes in slow progressive metastatic/inoperable paraganglioma (PGL) and pheochromocytoma (PHEO). There is no consensus on which treatment to administer and/or the best sequence in patients who are candidates for both therapies. To clarify these questions, this systematic review assesses the prognostic value of [131I]MIBG and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (PRRT-Lu) treatments in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) both globally and considering the primary location. Methods: This review was developed according to the PRISMA Statement with 27 final studies (608 patients). Patient characteristics, treatment procedure, and follow-up criteria were evaluated. In addition, a Bayesian linear regression model weighted according to its sample size and an alternative model, which also included an interaction between the treatment and the proportion of PHEOs, were carried out, adjusted by a Student's t distribution. Results: In linear regression models, [131I]MIBG overall PFS was, on average, 10 months lower when compared with PRRT-Lu. When considering the interaction between treatment responses and the proportion of PHEOs, PRRT-Lu showed remarkably better results in adrenal location. The PFS of PRRT-Lu was longer when the ratio of PHEOs increased, with a decrease in [131I]MIBG PFS by 1.9 months for each 10% increase in the proportion of PHEOs in the sample. Conclusion: Methodology, procedure, and PFS from the different studies are quite heterogeneous. PRRT-Lu showed better results globally and specifically in PHEOs. This fact opens the window to prospective trials comparing or sequencing [131I]MIBG and PRRT-Lu.

Comparative Role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT and 131I-MIBG Scintigraphy in Neuroblastoma and Application of Curie and SIOPEN Scoring Systems in 18F-DOPA PET/CT.

Purpose: Neuroblastoma (NB) is childhood's most common extracranial solid malignancy. We have compared two imaging modalities, 131I-MIBG and 18F-DOPA PET/CT, to evaluate NB. Also, feasibility of the application of standardised scoring systems, SIOPEN and Curie scoring systems, in 18F-DOPA PET/CT was explored. Methods: Patients with histopathology-proven NB underwent 131I-MIBG (planar and SPECT/CT) and 18F-DOPA PET/CT scans, as per standard imaging protocols. Duration between scans ranged from 1 to 30 days (median = 8 days). Number of lesions in Curie and SIOPEN scoring systems applied on both modalities was compared. Results: Forty-six patients were included (M:F = 29:17) with a median age of 36 months. Both 131I-MIBG and 18F-DOPA scans were positive in 39 patients and negative in four patients. 18F-DOPA PET/CT was positive in additional three patients, in which 131I-MIBG was negative (p = 0.25). Overall, 18F-DOPA identified significantly greater number of lesions than 131I-MIBG, especially metastatic skeletal lesions (p < 0.05). Significant difference was observed between Curie scores in the two modalities, unlike SIOPEN scores. However, when the cut-off age of 18 months was taken, no significant difference was seen in either of the scoring systems in both the scans (p > 0.05). CS and SIOPEN scores were significantly higher in bone marrow-positive patients. Conclusion: 18F-DOPA PET/CT detected more lesions than 131I-MIBG but had little impact on staging of the disease. For evaluation of NB, both scans can be used interchangeably as per the availability. Furthermore, both SIOPEN and Curie scoring systems, standardised for MIBG, can also be used to semi-quantify disease extent in 18F-DOPA PET/CT. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13139-022-00762-6.