Anomalous origin of the coronary artery: prevalence and coronary artery disease in adults undergoing coronary tomographic angiography.

BACKGROUND: Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is a rare congenital coronary anomaly with the potential to cause adverse cardiac events. However, there is limited data on the association between AAOCA and coronary artery disease (CAD). Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the prevalence and symptoms of patients with AAOCA, as well as investigate the correlation between AAOCA and CAD in a population referred for coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA). METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients who underwent CTA from 2010 to 2021 were included. Characteristics, symptoms, coronary related adverse events and CTA information were reviewed by medical records. Separate multivariable cumulative logistic regressions were performed, using the stenosis severity in each of the four coronaries as individual responses and as a combined patient clustered response. Finally, we identified 207 adult patients with AAOCA, the prevalence of AAOCA is 0.23% (207/90,501). Moreover, this study found no significant association between AAOCA and CAD. AAOCA did not contribute to higher rates of hospitalization or adverse cardiac events, including calcification. CONCLUSION: AAOCA is a rare congenital disease that is not associated with increased presence of obstructive CAD in adults.

Perceptions of exercise behavior and well-being in anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries.

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is associated with sudden death in the young. Risk stratification and management decision-making remain challenging. Data addressing post-diagnosis perceptions of exercise behavior and safety are lacking. We aimed to determine how AAOCA affects exercise behaviors, safety perceptions, and emotional well-being of patients/parents. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of AAOCA patient-/parent-specific survey was conducted to examine exercise frequency/restrictions, perceived safety of competitive/recreational exercise, and psychosocial well-being. Subgroups stratified by AAOCA subtype, surgical intervention, and physician-driven restrictions were compared using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Cohen's kappa determined agreement in parent/child responses. AAOCA subtypes included 13 (24%) left AAOCA, 36 (67%) right AAOCA, and 5 (9%) other/unknown. Of 54 parents and 41 paired child responses, 22% of patients were physician-restricted from exercise. Parents imposed restrictions on competitive/recreational exercise 34%/26% of the time, respectively. Children without physician restrictions still self-restricted exercise 35% of the time. Parents reported feeling their child was unsafe exercising 61% competitively and 33% recreationally. Twenty-two percent of children reported feeling unsafe exercising, with good agreement to parental perceptions of competitive exercise safety (kappa = 0.779, p < 0.001). One-third of parents and children reported feeling sad, angry, or lonely, and about half reported feeling different. Importantly, 47% of children desired to exercise more. No difference was seen across restriction status, AAOCA subtype, or surgical management strategy. CONCLUSION: There are different perceptions of exercise behavior and safety following AAOCA evaluation, regardless of risk category or management strategy, impacting their well-being. These unmet needs should be at the forefront of care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • AAOCA is one of the leading causes of sudden cardiac death in the young. • Exercise restriction varies according to AAOCA subtype and its perceived risk of inducing myocardial ischemia. WHAT IS NEW: • There are different perceptions of exercise behavior and safety in patients and parents following a diagnosis of AAOCA, impacting their well-being. • Risk category or management strategy has no effect in patients' and parents' perception of exercise safety. • These unmet needs in this population should be at the forefront of care.

Dobutamine Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Derived 2-Dimension Feature Tracking Strain Analysis in Pediatric Population with Anomalous Aortic Origin of Right Coronary Artery.

Anomalous aortic origin of right coronary artery (AAORCA) is associated with myocardial ischemia and sudden cardiac arrest/death. Risk stratification remains challenging and relies upon provocative test results. This study describes the utility of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DSCMR) and potential benefit of strain analysis in children with AAORCA. All patients less than 21 years of age with AAORCA who underwent DSCMR between July 2018 and December 2022 were included. Visual wall motion abnormalities (VWMA) at rest and during protocolized increments of dobutamine infusion were assessed. Regional and global left ventricular circumferential (GCS) and radial (GRS) strain using 2-dimension Feature tracking (2D-FT) analysis (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc.) were calculated at rest and peak response. Of the total 54 DSCMR studies performed in 51 children with median age (IQR) of 13.5 (11-15) years, FT analysis was reliably performed in 52 (96%) studies. None had VWMA. The absolute change in GCS and GRS from rest to peak dobutamine stress was 4% (1-6%) and 11% (4-18%), respectively. There was no significant difference in GCS and GRS in patients with exertional symptoms vs no/non-exertional symptoms as well as between those considered to be high-risk vs low-risk anatomical features. DSCMR-derived 2D-FT strain analysis is feasible to assess myocardial deformation in children with AAORCA and may enhance this method of provocative testing. Although there were no statically significant differences in GCS and GRS values between high and low-risk subgroups, the absolute change in GCS between rest and peak stress is diminished when compared to normal adult reports.