Baroreflex Function in Cardiovascular Disease.

The baroreflex system is involved in modulating several physiological functions of the cardiovascular system and can directly and indirectly modulate cardiac output, blood pressure, and cardiac electrophysiology. In addition, it is involved in regulating neurohormonal pathways involved in the cardiovascular function, such as the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and vasopressin release. Baroreflex dysfunction is characterized by sympathetic overactivation and parasympathetic withdrawal and is associated with several cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension, heart failure (HF), and coronary artery disease (CAD). Targeting the baroreflex system via invasive (e.g., baroreflex activation therapy and endovascular baroreceptor amplification) and non-invasive approaches (e.g., slow breathing exercises and exercise training) has emerged as a novel pathway to manage cardiovascular diseases. Studies examining the long-term safety and efficacy of such interventions in various cardiovascular diseases are needed.

Current and future use of neuromodulation in heart failure.

Autonomic imbalance is a common finding in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Addressing different targets within the autonomic nervous systems has been evaluated in patients with HF, including renal sympathetic denervation, vagal nerve stimulation, and baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT). Although all are pathophysiologically plausible and promising, only BAT shows sufficient evidence for implementation into clinical practice in randomized controlled trials. Baroreceptor activation therapy can be used in patients with symptomatic HFrEF despite optimal guideline-directed medication and device therapy. This article reviews the current and future use of neuromodulation in HF and provides an overview on current guideline recommendations and clinical practice.

[Baroreflex ActivationTherapy for Heart Failure].

Heart failure (HF) is the endstage of multiple cardiovascular diseases.Impaired autonomic regulation and sympathetic-parasympathetic imbalance are considered key factors in HF progression.Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT),a novel device-based therapy which stimulates the carotid sinuses and regulates autonomic function,has demonstrated good efficacy in treating HF and improving prognosis.This review summarized the results of the latest relevant studies to provide support for further study of BAT.

Cost-impact analysis of baroreflex activation therapy in chronic heart failure patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The study evaluated the cost of baroreflex activation therapy plus guideline directed therapy (BAT + GDT) compared to GDT alone for HF patients with reduced ejection fraction and New York Heart Association Class III or II (with a recent history of III). Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is delivered by an implantable device that stimulates the baroreceptors through an electrode attached to the outside of the carotid artery, which rebalances the autonomic nervous system to regain cardiovascular (CV) homeostasis. The BeAT-HF trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of BAT. METHODS: A cost impact model was developed from a U.S. health care payer or integrated delivery network perspective over a 3-year period for BAT + GDT versus GDT alone. Expected costs were calculated by utilizing 6-month data from the BeAT-HF trial and existing literature. HF hospitalization rates were extrapolated based on improvement in NT-proBNP. RESULTS: At baseline the expected cost of BAT + GDT were $29,526 per patient more than GDT alone due to BAT device and implantation costs. After 3 years, the predicted cost per patient was $9521 less expensive for BAT + GDT versus GDT alone due to lower rates of significant HF hospitalizations, CV non-HF hospitalizations, and resource intensive late-stage procedures (LVADs and heart transplants) among the BAT + GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: BAT + GDT treatment becomes less costly than GDT alone beginning between years 1 and 2 and becomes less costly cumulatively between years 2 and 3, potentially providing significant savings over time. As additional BeAT-HF trial data become available, the model can be updated to show longer term effects.

Cardiac Contractility Modulation and Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Heart Failure Patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite advances in medical therapy, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is still a leading cause of mortality, hospitalizations, and healthcare costs. In this review, we describe two novel, implantable devices for the treatment of patients with HFrEF, cardiac contractility modulation (CCM), and baroreflex activation therapy (BAT), and summarize literature regarding these devices from the last 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: CCM improves quality of life and functional capacity as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score, 6-min hall walk test (6MHWT) distance, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, peak oxygen consumption (pVO2), heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and mortality. BAT improves MLHFQ, 6-min walk test distance, NYHA functional class, and HF hospitalizations. Both devices have been shown to be safe. CCM and BAT have been shown to be safe and effective treatment modalities for HFrEF. CCM has been approved for use in Europe and has been implanted in thousands of patients. BAT has also been approved in Europe and continues to show promise in treating patients with HFrEF who fail optimal medical therapy (OMT). At present, both therapies are considered investigational in the USA.

Baroreflex stimulation for treating resistant hypertension: ready for the prime-time?

The search of alternative methods for improving clinical management and outcomes of individuals affected by resistant hypertension has become a true health priority. In this review, we aimed at providing a timely overview and evidence synthesis on baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) and endovascular baroreflex amplification (EBA), two device-based therapies which rely on the principle of lowering blood pressure by stimulating the carotid baroreflex to decrease the sympathetic and enhance the parasympathetic activity. In resistant forms of arterial hypertension, accruing evidence has confirmed the capacity of these techniques to improve blood pressure control and to reduce the amount of anti-hypertensive therapy at cost of few side effects. Future results from ongoing randomized sham-controlled trials are eagerly awaited to best define the efficacy, safety and durability of effects in the long term before such an invasive approach may be considered as a suitable option in daily clinical practice.

Endovascular Baroreflex Amplification for Resistant Hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Most hypertension devices have been designed to interrupt or modify the sympathetic nervous system, which seems to be unbalanced in hypertension. Carotid baroreceptors play a pivotal role in maintaining adrenergic balance via a direct feedback interface and would be an exceptional target for intervention. The purpose of this review is to define the role of the baroreceptor in hypertension, to examine device-based therapies targeting the baroreflex and to explore future promises of endovascular baroreflex amplification (EBA). RECENT FINDINGS: In the last two decades, two therapeutic strategies targeting the carotid baroreceptor have evolved: baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) and EBA. Both therapies enhance baroreceptor activity, either directly by electrical stimulation or indirectly by changing the geometric shape of the carotid sinus and increasing pulsatile wall strain. By showing a significant, sympathetic inhibition-mediated effect on blood pressure, BAT has laid the foundation for baroreflex-targeting therapies for resistant hypertension. EBA is a less invasive therapy with promising first-in-man study results. Ongoing randomized sham-controlled trials are needed to better understand efficacy, durability, and long-term safety and define phenotypes that may most benefit from this treatment.

An early analysis of cost-utility of baroreflex activation therapy in advanced chronic heart failure in Germany.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate cost-utility of baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) using the Barostim neo™ device (CVRx Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) compared with optimized medical management in patients with advanced chronic heart failure (NYHA class III) who were not eligible for treatment with cardiac resynchronization therapy, from a statutory health insurance perspective in Germany over a lifetime horizon. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed using the combination of a decision tree and the Markov process. The model included transitions between New York Heart Association (NYHA) health states, each of which is associated with a risk of mortality, hospitalization, cost, and quality of life. The effectiveness of BAT was projected through relative risks for mortality (obtained by application of patient-level data to the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk prediction model) and hospitalization owing to worsening of heart failure (obtained from BAT Randomized Clinical Trial). All patients were in NYHA class III at baseline. RESULTS: BAT led to an incremental cost of €33,185 (95% credible interval [CI] €24,561-38,637) and incremental benefits of 1.78 [95% CI 0.45-2.71] life-years and 1.19 [95% CI 0.30-1.81] quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €27,951/QALY (95% CI €21,357-82,970). BAT had a 59% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €35,000/QALY (but 84% at a threshold of €52,000/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: BAT can be cost-effective in European settings in those not eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy among patients with advanced heart failure.

The effects of baroreflex activation therapy on blood pressure and sympathetic function in patients with refractory hypertension: the rationale and design of the Nordic BAT study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) on hypertension in patients with treatment resistant or refractory hypertension. METHODS: This investigator-initiated randomized, double-blind, 1:1 parallel-design clinical trial will include 100 patients with refractory hypertension from 6 tertiary referral hypertension centers in the Nordic countries. A Barostim Neo System will be implanted and after 1 month patients will be randomized to either BAT for 16 months or continuous pharmacotherapy (BAT off) for 8 months followed by BAT for 8 months. A second randomization will take place after 16 months to BAT or BAT off for 3 months. Eligible patients have a daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM) of ≥145 mm Hg, and/or a daytime diastolic ABPM of ≥95 mm Hg after witnessed drug intake (including ≥3 antihypertensive drugs, preferably including a diuretic). RESULTS: The primary end point is the reduction in 24-hour systolic ABPM by BAT at 8 months, as compared to pharmacotherapy. Secondary and tertiary endpoints are effects of BAT on home and office blood pressures, measures of indices of cardiac and vascular structure and function during follow-up, and safety. CONCLUSIONS: This academic initiative will increase the understanding of mechanisms and role of BAT in the refractory hypertension.

Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure: Novel Findings and Future Insights.

Congestive heart failure is characterized by hemodynamic and non-hemodynamic abnormalities, the latter including an activation of the sympathetic influences to the heart and peripheral circulation coupled with an impairment of baroreceptor control of autonomic function. Evidence has been provided that both these alterations are hallmark features of the disease with a specific relevance for the disease progression as well as for the development of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. In addition, a number of studies have documented in heart failure the adverse prognostic role of the sympathetic and baroreflex alterations, which both are regarded as major independent determinants of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This represents the pathophysiological and clinical background for the use of carotid baroreceptor activation therapy in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Promising data collected in experimental animal models of heart failure have supported the recent performance of pilot small-scale clinical studies, aimed at providing initial information in this area. The results of these studies demonstrated the clinical safety and efficacy of the intervention which has been tested in large-scale clinical studies. The present paper will critically review the background and main results of the published studies designed at defining the clinical impact of baroreflex activation therapy in congestive heart failure patients. Emphasis will be given to the strengths and limitations of such studies, which represent the background for the ongoing clinical trials testing the long-term effects of the device in heart failure patients.

Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Available Data and Future Perspective.

Progression of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is promoted by sympathovagal imbalance. Baroreflex activation therapy, i.e., electrical stimulation of baroreceptors at the carotid sinus, can restore sympathovagal balance. Large animal studies of baroreflex activation therapy revealed improvements in cardiac function, susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias, and a survival benefit as compared to untreated controls. Recently, the first randomized and controlled trial of optimal medical and device therapy alone or plus baroreflex activation therapy in patients suffering from HFrEF was published. It demonstrated a reasonable safety profile in this severely ill patient population. Moreover, the study found significant improvements in New York Heart Association class, quality of life, 6-min walk distance, and NT-proBNP levels. This review provides an overview on baroreflex activation therapy for the treatment of HFrEF-from the concept and preclinical findings to most recent clinical data and upcoming trials.

[Baroreflex activation therapy. A novel interventional approach to treat heart failure with reduced ejection fraction]. / Baroreflexaktivierungstherapie. Ein neuer interventioneller Ansatz zur Behandlung der systolischen Herzinsuffizienz.

Sympathovagal imbalance plays an important role in the progression of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT), i. e. electrical stimulation of baroreceptors located at the carotid sinus, can reduce sympathetic and enhance parasympathetic tone. Large animal studies on BAT demonstrated improvements in cardiac function, arrhythmogenic risk and a survival benefit compared to untreated controls. The recently published Neo Randomized Heart Failure Study, the first multicenter, randomized and controlled trial of optimal medical and device therapy alone or plus BAT in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35 %, demonstrated a reasonable safety profile of BAT in this severely ill patient population and no relevant interactions with other devices. The study found significant improvements in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of heart failure, quality of life as well as 6 min walking distance and data pointed to a reduction in hospitalization rates. Moreover, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were significantly reduced. This review gives an overview on BAT for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, from the rationale and animal experiments to the most recent clinical data and future perspectives.

Interventional and device-based autonomic modulation in heart failure.

"Heart failure is an increasingly prevalent disease with high mortality and public health burden. It is associated with autonomic imbalance characterized by sympathetic hyperactivity and parasympathetic hypoactivity. Evolving novel interventional and device-based therapies have sought to restore autonomic balance by neuromodulation. Results of preclinical animal studies and early clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these therapies in heart failure. This article discusses specific neuromodulatory treatment modalities individually-spinal cord stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, baroreceptor activation therapy, and renal sympathetic nerve denervation."

Effects of baroreflex activation therapy on cardiac function and morphology.

AIMS: Arterial hypertension (aHTN) plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The risk of heart failure increases with therapy-resistant arterial hypertension (trHTN), defined as inadequate blood pressure (BP) control ≥140/90 mmHg despite taking ≥3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic. This study investigates the effects of the BP lowering baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) on cardiac function and morphology in patients with trHTN with and without HFpEF. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive patients who had been diagnosed with trHTN and received BAT implantation between 2012 and 2016 were prospectively observed. Office BP, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data were collected before and after BAT implantation. RESULTS: Mean patients' age was 59.1 years, 46.9% were male, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 33.2 kg/m2. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 38.8%, atrial fibrillation was 12.2%, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage ≥3 was 40.8%. Twenty-eight patients had trHTN with HFpEF, and 21 patients had trHTN without HFpEF. Patients with HFpEF were significantly older (64.7 vs. 51.6 years, P < 0.0001), had a lower BMI (30.0 vs. 37.2 kg/m2, P < 0.0001), and suffered more often from CKD-stage ≥3 (64 vs. 20%, P = 0.0032). After BAT implantation, mean office BP dropped in patients with and without HFpEF (from 169 ± 5/86 ± 4 to 143 ± 4/77 ± 3 mmHg [P = 0.0019 for systolic BP and 0.0403 for diastolic BP] and from 170 ± 5/95 ± 4 to 149 ± 6/88 ± 5 mmHg [P = 0.0019 for systolic BP and 0.0763 for diastolic BP]), while a significant reduction of the intake of calcium-antagonists, α2-agonists and direct vasodilators, as well as a decrease in average dosage of ACE-inhibitors and α2-agonists could be seen. Within the study population, a decrease in heart rate from 74 ± 2 to 67 ± 2 min-1 (P = 0.0062) and lengthening of QRS-time from 96 ± 3 to 106 ± 4 ms (P = 0.0027) and QTc-duration from 422 ± 5 to 432 ± 5 ms (P = 0.0184) were detectable. The PQ duration was virtually unchanged. In patients without HF, no significant changes of echocardiographic parameters could be seen. In patients with HFpEF, posterior wall diameter decreased significantly from 14.0 ± 0.5 to 12.7 ± 0.3 mm (P = 0.0125), left ventricular mass (LVM) declined from 278.1 ± 15.8 to 243.9 ± 13.4 g (P = 0.0203), and e' lateral increased from 8.2 ± 0.4 to 9.0 ± 0.4 cm/s (P = 0.0471). CONCLUSIONS: BAT reduced systolic and diastolic BP and was associated with morphological and functional improvement of HFpEF.

Key challenges in exploring the rat as a preclinical neurostimulation model for aortic baroreflex modulation in hypertension.

Electrode-based electrophysiological interfaces with peripheral nerves have come a long way since the 1960s, with several neurostimulation applications witnessing widespread clinical implementation since then. In resistant hypertension, previous clinical trials have shown that "carotid" baroreflex stimulation using device-based baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) can effectively lower blood pressure (BP). However, device-based "aortic" baroreflex stimulation remains untouched for clinical translation. The rat is a remarkable animal model that facilitates exploration of mechanisms pertaining to the baroreceptor reflex and preclinical development of novel therapeutic strategies for BP modulation and hypertension treatment. Specifically, the aortic depressor nerve (ADN) in rats carries a relatively pure population of barosensitive afferent neurons, which enable selective investigation of the aortic baroreflex function. In a rat model of essential hypertension, the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), we have recently investigated the aortic baroreceptor afferents as an alternate target for BP modulation, and showed that "low intensity" stimulation is able to evoke clinically meaningful reductions in BP. Deriving high quality short-term and long-term data on aortic baroreflex modulation in rats is currently hampered by a number of unresolved experimental challenges, including anatomical variations across rats which complicates identification of the ADN, the use of unrefined neurostimulation tools or paradigms, and issues arising from anesthetized and conscious surgical preparations. With the goal of refining existing experimental protocols designed for preclinical investigation of the baroreflex, this review seeks to outline current challenges hindering further progress in aortic baroreflex modulation studies in rats and present some practical considerations and recently emerging ideas to overcome them. Aortic baroreflex modulation.

Baroreflex activation therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: In recent years, baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) has been utilized to treat heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the supporting literature on its efficacy and safety is still limited. This investigation elucidates the effects of BAT in HFrEF patients to provide a reference for future clinical applications. Methods: This investigation follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Relevant investigations on the use of BAT in HFrEF patients were searched and selected from 5 databases, including Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, from inception to December 2022. The methodological quality of eligible articles was assessed via the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and for meta-analysis, RevMan (5.3) was used. Results: Randomized controlled trials comprising 343 participants were selected for the meta-analysis, which revealed that in HFrEF patients, BAT enhanced the levels of LVEF (MD: 2.97, 95 % CI: 0.53 to 5.41), MLHFQ (MD: -14.81, 95 % CI: -19.57 to -10.06) and 6MWT (MD: 68.18, 95 % CI: 51.62 to 84.74), whereas reduced the levels of LVEDV (MD: -15.79, 95 % CI: -32.96 to 1.37) and DBP (MD: -2.43, 95 % CI: -4.18 to -0.68). Conclusion: It was concluded that BAT is an efficient treatment option for HFrEF patients. However, to validate this investigation, further randomized clinical trials with multiple centers and large sample sizes are needed.

Advances in device-based treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: evidence from clinical trials.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a group of clinical syndromes that exhibit a remarkably heterogeneous phenotype, characterized by symptoms and signs of heart failure, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, elevated levels of natriuretic peptides, and an ejection fraction greater than or equal to 50%. With the aging of the population and the escalating prevalence of hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, the incidence of HFpEF is progressively rising. Drug therapy options for HFpEF are currently limited, and the associated high risk of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure rehospitalization significantly impact patients' quality of life and longevity while imposing a substantial economic burden on society. Recent research indicates that certain device-based therapies may serve as valuable adjuncts to drug therapy in patients with specific phenotypes of HFpEF, effectively improving symptoms and quality of life while reducing the risk of readmission for heart failure. These include inter-atrial shunt and greater splanchnic nerve ablation to reduce left ventricular filling pressure, implantable heart failure monitor to guide diuresis, left atrial pacing to correct interatrial dyssynchrony, cardiac contractility modulation to enhance cardiac calcium handling, as well as renal denervation, baroreflex activation therapy, and vagus nerve stimulation to restore the autonomic imbalance. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms and clinical evidence pertaining to these devices, with the aim of enhancing therapeutic strategies for HFpEF.

Efficacy and safety of baroreflex activation therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: systematic review.

Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is a possible adjuvant treatment for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and may be an alternative therapy in patients with contraindications or drug intolerance. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAT in patients with HFrEF. The protocol for this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022349175). Searches were conducted using MEDLINE, preMedLine (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Trip Medical Database, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of BAT with pharmacological treatment. We assessed the risk of bias of each study using the Cochrane RoB2 tool and the certainty of the results using the GRADE approach. We performed a meta-analysis of treatment effects using a fixed-effects or random-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity observed. Two studies were included in the meta-analysis (HOPE4HF and BeAT-HF). The results showed that BAT led to statistically significant improvements in New York Heart Association functional class (relative risk 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI, 1.65 to 2.76]), quality of life (difference in means -16.97; 95% CI [-21.87 to -12.07]), 6 min walk test (difference in means 56.54; 95% CI [55.67 to 57.41]) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (difference in means -120.02; 95% CI [-193.58 to -46.45]). The system- and procedure-related complication event-free rate varied from 85.9% to 97%. The results show that BAT is safe and improves functional class, quality of life and congestion in selected patients with HFrEF. Further studies and long-term follow-up are needed to assess efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events and mortality.

Baroreflex activation therapy in advanced heart failure therapy: insights from a real-world scenario.

AIMS: Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is an innovative treatment option for advanced heart failure (HFrEF). We analysed patients' BAT acceptance and the outcome of BAT patients compared with HFrEF patients solely treated with a guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and studied effects of sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI). METHODS: In this prospective study, 40 HFrEF patients (71 ± 3 years, 20% female) answered a questionnaire on the acceptance of BAT. Follow-up visits were performed after 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary efficacy endpoints included an improvement in QoL, NYHA class, LVEF, HF hospitalization, NT-proBNP levels, and 6MHWD. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (73%) showed interest in BAT. Ten patients (25%) opted for implantation. BAT and BAT + ARNI patients developed an increase in LVEF (BAT +10%, P-value (P) = 0.005*; BAT + ARNI +9%, P = 0.049*), an improved NYHA class (BAT -88%, P = 0.014*, BAT + ARNI -90%, P = 0.037*), QoL (BAT +21%, P = 0.020*, BAT + ARNI +22%, P = 0.012*), and reduced NT-proBNP levels (BAT -24%, P = 0.297, BAT + ARNI -37%, P = 0.297). BAT HF hospitalization rates were lower (50%) compared with control group patients (83%) (P = 0.020*). CONCLUSIONS: Although BAT has generated considerable interest, acceptance appears to be ambivalent. BAT improves outcome with regard to LVEF, NYHA class, QoL, NT-proBNP levels, and HF hospitalization rates. BAT + ARNI resulted in more pronounced effects than ARNI alone.

Baroreflex activation therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a single-centre experience.

AIMS: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with excessive sympathetic and impaired parasympathetic activity. The Barostim Neo™ device is used for electronical baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) to counteract autonomic nervous system dysbalance. Randomized trials have shown that BAT improves walking distance and reduces N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels at least in patients with only moderate elevation at baseline. Its impact on the risk of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) and death is not yet established, and experience in clinical routine is limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report on patient characteristics and clinical outcome in a retrospective, non-randomized single-centre registry of BAT in HFrEF. Patients in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classes III and IV with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% despite guideline-directed medical therapy were eligible. Symptom burden, echocardiography, and laboratory testing were assessed at baseline and after 12 months. Clinical events of HFH and death were recorded at routine clinical follow-up. Data are shown as number (%) or median (inter-quartile range). Between 2014 and 2020, 30 patients were treated with BAT. Median age was 67 (63-77) years, and 27 patients (90%) were male. Most patients (83%) had previous HFH. Device implantation was successful in all patients. At 12 months, six patients had died and three were alive but did not attend follow-up. NYHA class was III/IV in 26 (87%)/4 (13%) patients at baseline, improved in 19 patients, and remained unchanged in 5 patients (P < 0.001). LVEF improved from 25.5 (20.0-30.5) % at baseline to 30.0 (25.0-36.0) % at 12 months (P = 0.014). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter remained unchanged. A numerical decrease in NT-proBNP [3165 (880-8085) vs. 1001 (599-3820) pg/mL] was not significant (P = 0.526). Median follow-up for clinical events was 16 (10-33) months. Mortality at 1 (n = 6, 20%) and 3 years (n = 10, 33%) was as expected by the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score. Despite BAT, event rate was high in patients with NYHA Class IV, NT-proBNP levels >1600 pg/mL, or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min at baseline. NYHA class and eGFR were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFrEF who are selected for BAT are in a stage of worsening or even advanced heart failure. BAT appears to be safe and improves clinical symptoms and-to a modest degree-left ventricular function. The risk of death remains high in advanced disease stages. Patient selection seems to be crucial, and the impact of BAT in earlier disease stages needs to be established.