Pathogenic TNF-α drives peripheral nerve inflammation in an Aire-deficient model of autoimmunity.

Immune cells infiltrate the peripheral nervous system (PNS) after injury and with autoimmunity, but their net effect is divergent. After injury, immune cells are reparative, while in inflammatory neuropathies (e.g., Guillain Barré Syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy), immune cells are proinflammatory and promote autoimmune demyelination. An understanding of immune cell phenotypes that distinguish these conditions may, therefore, reveal new therapeutic targets for switching immune cells from an inflammatory role to a reparative state. In an autoimmune regulator (Aire)-deficient mouse model of inflammatory neuropathy, we used single-cell RNA sequencing of sciatic nerves to discover a transcriptionally heterogeneous cellular landscape, including multiple myeloid, innate lymphoid, and lymphoid cell types. Analysis of cell-cell ligand-receptor interactions uncovered a macrophage-mediated tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) signaling axis that is induced by interferon-γ and required for initiation of autoimmune demyelination. Developmental trajectory visualization suggested that TNF-α signaling is associated with metabolic reprogramming of macrophages and polarization of macrophages from a reparative state in injury to a pathogenic, inflammatory state in autoimmunity. Autocrine TNF-α signaling induced macrophage expression of multiple genes (Clec4e, Marcksl1, Cxcl1, and Cxcl10) important in immune cell activation and recruitment. Genetic and antibody-based blockade of TNF-α/TNF-α signaling ameliorated clinical neuropathy, peripheral nerve infiltration, and demyelination, which provides preclinical evidence that the TNF-α axis may be effectively targeted to resolve inflammatory neuropathies.

Outcome measures in pediatric chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Objective outcome measures in children undergoing treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are lacking. The aim of the study was to record serial grip strength and motor nerve conduction studies to assess interval change. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 16 children (8 females and 8 males; median age, 9.7 years; interquartile range, 6-13 years) with CIDP followed at a tertiary children's hospital from 2013 to 2021. Subjects were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Right and left grip strength measurements were obtained at each clinic visit using a handheld dynamometer. Annual right median motor nerve conduction study data were recorded during the study period. RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 2.9 years. Grip strength (right: 0.19 kg/month, p < 0.001; left 0.23 kg/month, p < 0.001) and median F-wave latencies (-0.23/month, p = 0.015) showed significant improvement over time. Akaike information criterion showed time + IVIG frequency <21 days as best fit for grip strength and distal compound muscle action potential amplitude. DISCUSSION: Our study results indicate serial grip strength measurements are a feasible and objective way to assess motor strength improvement in children with CIDP receiving immunotherapy.

Whole-body magnetic resonance neurography in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Whole-body magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is an imaging modality that shows peripheral nerve signal change in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We aimed to explore the diagnostic potential of whole-body MRN and its potential as a monitoring tool after immunotherapy in treatment-naïve CIDP patients. METHODS: Whole-body MRN using coronal 3-dimensional short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) techniques was performed in patients being investigated for CIDP and in healthy controls. Baseline clinical neuropathy scales and electrophysiologic parameters were collected, and MRN findings were compared before and after CIDP treatment. RESULTS: We found highly concordant symmetrical thickening and increased T2 signal intensities in the brachial/lumbosacral plexus, femoral, or sciatic nerves in five of the eight patients with a final diagnosis of CIDP and none of the healthy controls. There were no treatment-related imaging changes in five patients with CIDP who completed a follow-up study. Diffuse, symmetrical thickening, and increased T2 signal in root, plexus, and peripheral nerves were found in two patients ultimately excluded due to a diagnosis of polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, skin changes (POEMS) syndrome in addition to signal changes in the muscles, bony lesions, organomegaly, and lymphadenopathy. DISCUSSION: Whole-body MRN imaging shows promise in detecting abnormalities in proximal nerve segments in patients with CIDP. Future studies evaluating the role of MRN in assessing treatment response should consider follow-up scans after treatment durations of more than 4 months.

Theory of mind and executive dysfunction in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is understood as a disease affecting the peripheral nervous system, mild cognitive dysfunction, particularly in the executive domain, has been described to form part of the condition. Here our interest lay in CIDP-related theory of mind (ToM) capacities as an aspect of social cognition relevant for many aspects of everyday life. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with CIDP and 23 healthy controls participated in this study. They were subjected to overview cognitive testing, different executive function (EF) tasks, as well as to the Faux Pas Recognition Task (FPRT) for assessing cognitive ToM and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) with respect to affective ToM. RESULTS: Persons with CIDP and controls did not differ with respect to their overall cognitive state. However, in the German verbal fluency standard, the digit span forward and the digit span backward tests used as EF tasks patients performed significantly worse than controls. Further, performance was abnormally low in the FPRT, whilst the groups did not differ with respect to RMET results. The FPRT and digit span backward results correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CIDP showed deficits in cognitive ToM performance together with EF dysfunction, whilst affective ToM was preserved. Altogether, the results suggest that low cognitive ToM capacities in patients with CIDP arise as a particular aspect of disease-related executive dysfunction.

An immuno-DOT diagnostic assay for autoimmune nodopathy.

OBJECTIVES: Autoimmune nodopathy (AN) is a life-threatening peripheral neuropathy mediated by four autoantibodies targeting axoglial cell adhesion molecules at the nodes of Ranvier: Neurofascin-155 (Nfasc155), PanNeurofascin (PanNfasc), Contactin-1 (CNTN1), and Contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1). Antibody detection is a strong biomarker for AN diagnosis and treatment monitoring. The aim of this study was to develop an immuno-dot assay (immuno-DOT) compatible with routine implementation in medical laboratories. METHODS: This new approach was compared to standard techniques: indirect immunofluorescence assay, cell-based assay, and ELISA. Sensitivities (Se) and specificities (Sp) were calculated on a cohort composed of 58 patients diagnosed with AN, 50 seronegative patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, 20 healthy controls, 30 patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, 20 with monoclonal gammopathy and 20 with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. The patients were diagnosed with AN based on compatible electro-clinical arguments and at least two positive standard techniques. RESULTS: Immuno-DOT sensitivities and specificities were Se=91 %, Sp=97 % for anti-Nfasc155; Se=80 %, Sp=94 % for anti-PanNfasc; Se=93 %, Sp=98 % for anti-CNTN1; and Se=87 %, Sp=94 % for anti-CASPR1. Immuno-DOT allowed the diagnosis within 3 h and the accurate follow-up of the immune reactivity and isotype, and dot intensity correlated with antibody titers following treatments. A longitudinal study indicated that immuno-DOT yielded reliable results even after six months of storage at -20 °C. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of immuno-DOT was satisfactory and compatible with routine implementation in medical laboratories.

CIDP prognosis in patients with IVIG treatment-related fluctuations.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune-mediated peripheral nerve disorder with variable prognosis and long-term dependence on immunotherapy. Frequent assessment of grip strength can be a useful tool to identify intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment-related fluctuations (TRFs) and optimize IVIG treatment in real-time, but the long-term implications of TRFs are unknown. We aimed to explore the impact that real-time TRFs had on long-term CIDP prognosis, strength impairment, and disability. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed standard of care clinical and treatment outcomes in patients who participated in a published prospective study of intra-IVIG-cycle grip strength quantification. Patients were analyzed based upon the presence or absence of TRFs, as determined in the initial prospective study. RESULTS: Data were available for 23 CIDP patients with a mean follow-up period of 44.7 mo. There were no differences in baseline or follow-up strength, disability, or IVIG usage in patients with a low number of fluctuations compared to those with a high number of fluctuations. In both groups, drug-free remission was achieved in about one-third of patients. DISCUSSION: TRFs are important to identify in order to optimize treatment in real time, but poorly predict long-term disease activity status. The presence of minor TRFs are unlikely to result in substantial accumulation of disability over time. Periodic IVIG optimization trials using objective outcomes are encouraged in all CIDP patients receiving chronic IVIG treatment as a means to identify the lowest effective IVIG dose and frequency.

Outcome in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Outcomes in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) have been reported in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. A considerable variation in long-term disease outcome has appeared in those reports. To overcome this uncertainty, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on CIDP outcomes, including the parameters of case fatality rate, ambulation, physical ability, and remission. METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE (OVID) for reports with at least 2 years of follow-up on patients with active or previously active CIDP that were published no later than May 12, 2022. Studies were appraised for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for studies reporting prevalence data. Pooled analyses were conducted and the results were visualized using forest plots. The study protocol was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD42021266903). RESULTS: A total of 1290 titles were identified. Sixty-nine full-text articles were screened and 21 studies with 1199 patients were selected for the data analysis. The pooled case fatality rate was 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9% to 5.7%). The pooled fraction of nonambulatory patients was 8.2% (95% CI, 5.7% to 11.6%) and, overall, 47.1% (95% CI, 39.5% to 54.9%) of CIDP patients had a good outcome without disability. The pooled rate of remission was 40.8% (95% CI, 30.6% to 51.8%). DISCUSSION: Future research is warranted on how to prevent long-term impairment in CIDP. Care should be taken in developing clinical strategies to avoid immunomodulating therapy in the many patients in remission.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy-associated tremor: Phenotype and pathogenesis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tremor in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is underrecognized, and the pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. This study evaluated tremor in CIDP and tested the hypothesis, established in other demyelinating neuropathies, that tremor occurs due to mistimed peripheral inputs affecting central motor processing. Additionally, the tremor stability index (TSI) was calculated with the hypothesis that CIDP-related tremor is more variable than other tremor disorders. METHODS: Consecutive patients with typical CIDP were prospectively recruited from neuromuscular clinics. Alternative causes of neuropathy and tremor were excluded. Cross-sectional clinical assessment and extensive tremor study recordings were undertaken. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to compare nerve conduction studies and tremor characteristics, and t-test was used for comparisons between groups. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with CIDP were included. Upper limb postural and action tremor was present in 66% and was mild according to the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale. Tremor did not significantly impact disability. Surface electromyography (EMG) found high-frequency spectral peaks in deltoid (13.73 ± 0.66 Hz), biceps brachii (11.82 ± 0.91 Hz), and extensor carpi radialis (11.87 ± 0.91 Hz) muscles, with lower peaks in abductor pollicis brevis EMG (6.07 ± 0.45 Hz) and index finger accelerometry (6.53 ± 0.42 Hz). Tremor was unchanged by weight loading but correlated with ulnar nerve F-wave latency and median nerve sensory amplitude. TSI (2.3 ± 0.1) was significantly higher than essential tremor. CONCLUSIONS: Postural tremor is a common feature in CIDP. Tremor was unaffected by weight loading, typical of centrally generated tremors, although there was a correlation with peripheral nerve abnormalities. The high beat-to-beat variability on TSI and gradation of peak frequencies further suggest a complex pathophysiology. These findings may assist clinicians with the diagnosis of neuropathic tremor.

Chronic inflammatory neuropathies and their impact on activities and participation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) are inflammatory neuropathies that can lead to considerable limitations in daily activities and in social participation. However, systematic evaluation of these self-reported limitations is lacking in the currently available studies. Understanding the impact of these diagnoses on patients' life is important to optimize management strategies. AIM: To systematically assess the self-reported limitations in activities and participation and determine associated factors. METHODS: A survey study was conducted in 2021 in a cohort of patients with CIDP (n = 257) and MMN (n = 148) from a university hospital. The survey included the Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation, questions addressing personal and disease-related factors and treatment. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine associations with disease-related and personal factors. RESULTS: A total of 147 CIDP and 103 MMN patients responded. Limitations in activities were reported by 70.7% CIDP and 52.2% MMN patients with moderate to severe limitations in 22.4% and 5.9% patients, respectively. Participation restrictions were reported by 50% of CIDP and 40% of MMN patients, nevertheless satisfaction with participation was high. Fatigue, pain and resilience were independently associated with limitations in activities and satisfaction with participation in CIDP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Activity limitations and restrictions in participation are common in CIDP patients and to a lesser extent in MMN patients. Fatigue, pain and resilience independently contributed to perceived limitations in CIDP patients. Referral to a rehabilitation physician is warranted to address these limitations appropriately.

A diagnostic score for anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein neuropathy or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in patients with anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein antibody.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A diagnostic score was developed to discriminate anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and applied it to patients with atypical anti-MAG neuropathy. METHODS: The clinical and electrophysiological features of patients with a diagnosis of typical anti-MAG neuropathy were compared to those of patients with a diagnosis of CIDP. The association of each feature with the diagnosis was assessed in the two groups. Features showing a significant association with the diagnosis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model and adjusted odds ratios were estimated for each feature. A score ranging from 1 to 3 was applied to each feature based on the magnitude of the estimated odds ratios. The score was then applied to patients with a clinical diagnosis of CIDP who also had high anti-MAG antibody titers (CIDP-MAG). RESULTS: Thirty-one anti-MAG neuropathy patients, 45 typical CIDP patients and 16 CIDP-MAG patients were included. Scores in anti-MAG antibody patients ranged from 1 to 5 and in CIDP patients from -7 to -1. Using the score, 4/16 CIDP-MAG patients were diagnosed to have anti-MAG neuropathy and 12/16 patients to have CIDP. Response to intravenous immunoglobulin in the CIDP-MAG patients classified as CIDP was similar to that of definite CIDP patients and higher than that of anti-MAG neuropathy patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our score allowed an accurate discrimination to be made, amongst patients with anti-MAG antibodies, of those affected by CIDP and the patients with anti-MAG neuropathy. This score may help proper treatment to be chosen for patients with anti-MAG antibodies with a CIDP-like presentation.

Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treatment in refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment options for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) are intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs. However, a substantial proportion of patients with CIDP remain refractory to treatment and develop severe functional disability. A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) treatment in refractory CIDP patients was performed. METHODS: The study is based on queries in the PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science and clinicaltrials.gov databases on 4 December 2022. Articles that met our eligibility criteria were included after screening. Patients' characteristics, treatment regime and outcome measures were extracted. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients in 11 studies were included. The pooled estimate of responsiveness amongst the four included studies was 87.04% (95% confidence interval 66.7%-99.5%) and the pooled estimate of freedom of all immune modulating or suppressive drugs was 80.75% (95% confidence interval 71.2%-90.2%). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis and systematic review suggested that HSCT can be effective in the treatment of refractory CIDP. Whilst there are risks involved, HSCT may be a beneficial and viable therapy for refractory CIDP when carefully evaluated.

Fatigue, depression, and product tolerability during long-term treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (Gamunex® 10%) in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is characterized by progressive weakness and sensory loss, often affecting patient's ability to walk and perform activities of daily living independently. Furthermore, patients often report fatigue and depression which can affect their quality of life. These symptoms were assessed in CIDP patients receiving long-term intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment. METHODS: GAMEDIS was a multi-center, prospective, non-interventional study in adult CIDP patients treated with IVIG (10%) and followed for two years. Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score, Hughes Disability Scale (HDS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI), Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Score Attributable to General Health (WPAI-GH) were assessed at baseline and quarterly. Dosing and treatment intervals, changes in outcome parameters, and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. RESULTS: 148 evaluable patients were followed for a mean of 83.3 weeks. The mean maintenance IVIG dose was 0.9 g/kg/cycle (mean cycle interval 38 days). Disability and fatigue remained stable throughout the study. Mean INCAT score: 2.4 ± 1.8 at baseline and 2.5 ± 1.9 at study end. HDS: 74.3% healthy/minor symptoms at baseline and 71.6% at study end. Mean FSS: 4.2 ± 1.6 at baseline and 4.1 ± 1.7 at study end. All patients reported minimal/no depression at baseline and throughout. SF-36 and WPAI-GH scores remained stable. Fifteen patients (9.5%) experienced potentially treatment-related AEs. There were no AEs in 99.3% of infusions. DISCUSSION: Long-term treatment of CIDP patients with IVIG 10% in real-world conditions maintained clinical stability on fatigue and depression over 96 weeks. This treatment was well-tolerated and safe.

Imbalance and lower limb tremor in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Imbalance is a prominent symptom of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Although upper limb tremor in CIDP is described, lower limb tremor has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to determine whether lower limb tremor was present in CIDP and assess potential relationships with imbalance. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study of prospectively recruited consecutive patients with typical CIDP (N = 25). Clinical phenotyping, lower limb nerve conduction and tremor studies, and posturography analyses were performed. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) divided CIDP patients into those with "good" and "poor" balance. RESULTS: Lower limb tremor was evident in 32% of CIDP patients and associated with poor balance (BBSTremor 35 [23-46], BBSNo Tremor 52 [44-55], p = .035). Tremor frequency was 10.2-12.5 Hz with legs outstretched and on standing, apart from four patients with a lower frequency tremor (3.8-4.6 Hz) while standing. Posturography analysis revealed a high-frequency spectral peak in the vertical axis in 44% of CIDP patients (16.0 ± 0.4 Hz). This was more likely in those with "good" balance (40% vs. 4%, p = .013). INTERPRETATION: Lower limb tremor is present in one third of CIDP patients and is associated with poor balance. A high-frequency peak on posturography is associated with better balance in CIDP. Lower limb tremor and posturography assessments could serve as important biomarkers of balance in a clinical setting.

The effect of tremor on disability assessment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Tremor in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is common, often unresponsive to treatment, and may contribute to disability. We aim to investigate whether tremor is associated with disability as measured in daily practice and clinical trials, independent of other impairments. We included 76 CIDP patients in this cross-sectional study. We assessed tremor with the Tremor Research Group essential tremor rating assessment scale (TETRAS) and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin clinical rating scale (FTM). Disability was measured with the inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability scale (I-RODS) and the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT-DS, categorized separately in arm score, or total score). Impairments including strength, sensory impairment, and fatigue were measured using specific impairment scales. We tested whether "the presence of a clinically relevant tremor" (based on TETRAS and FTM) or "tremor severity" (FTM part B sum score) was associated with disability scores (I-RODS, INCAT-DS total score, and INCAT-DS arm score), independent of the impairment scores, using multivariate regression. Both "the presence of a clinically relevant tremor" and "tremor severity" were significantly associated with disability measured by the INCAT-DS (arm score and total score), but not the I-RODS, independent of strength, sensory impairment, and fatigue. The explained variances were low. Clinically relevant tremor can (partly) explain disability in CIDP, as measured with the INCAT-DS, independent of muscle strength, sensory deficits, and fatigue. To assess disease activity in CIDP patients with tremor, both impairment and disability outcomes should be assessed, as disability is caused partly by tremor while the effect of immunotherapy on tremor seems limited.

B-cell and T-cell receptor repertoire in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, a prospective cohort study.

The immunopathophysiological mechanisms underlying chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in an individual patient are largely unknown. Better understanding of these mechanisms may aid development of biomarkers and targeted therapies. Both B- and T-cell dominant mechanisms have been implicated. We therefore investigated whether B-cell and T-cell receptor (BCR/TCR) repertoires might function as immunological biomarkers in CIDP. In this prospective cohort study, we longitudinally sampled peripheral blood of CIDP patients in three different phases of CIDP: starting induction treatment (IT), starting withdrawal from IVIg maintenance treatment (MT), and patients in remission (R). BCR and TCR repertoires were analyzed using RNA based high throughput sequencing. In baseline samples, the number of total clones, the number of dominant BCR and TCR clones and their impact on the repertoire was similar for patients in the IT, MT, and remission groups compared with healthy controls. Baseline samples in the IT or MT did not predict treatment response or potential relapse at follow-up. Treatment responders in the IT group showed a potential IVIg-induced increase in the number of dominant BCR clones and their impact at follow-up (baseline1.0 [IQR 1.0-2.8] vs. 6 m 3.5 [0.3-6.8]; P < .05, Wilcoxon test). Although the BCR repertoire changed over time, the TCR repertoire remained robustly stable. We conclude that TCR and BCR repertoire distributions do not predict disease activity, treatment response or response to treatment withdrawal.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Diagnostic problems in clinical practice in Serbia.

Making diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is challenging since it can mimic a multitude of disorders, and is misdiagnosed in at least 50% of cases. We sought to determine the frequency of CIDP misdiagnosis in clinical practice in Serbia, to uncover CIDP mimics, and to identify factors that may aid in CIDP diagnosis. Our longitudinal retrospective cohort study included 86 eligible adult patients referred to the Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, with a diagnosis of CIDP. We also included 15 patients referred to us with different diagnoses that ended up having CIDP as their final diagnosis. Exactly half of patients referred as CIDP failed to meet the established diagnostic criteria (non-CIDP) and were given an alternative diagnosis at the first hospitalization. At the 1-year follow-up, the diagnosis was further revised in four subjects. Confirmed CIDP patients usually had their initial diagnosis based on the nerve conduction studies (NCS), a typical presentation with symmetrical involvement of all four limbs, as well as higher frequencies of elevated protein levels and albuminocytologic dissociation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CIDP patients also responded better to immune therapy. We found that 52% of the patients initially referred to our Clinic as CIDP were given other diagnoses after a 1-year follow-up. Out of all CIDP cases, 27% had been unrecognized prior to referral to our Center. Utilization of clear and objective indicators - conclusive NCS, improvement on therapy, and elevated CSF proteins may provide greater certainty in diagnosing CIDP.

An innovative phase 2 proof-of-concept trial design to evaluate SAR445088, a monoclonal antibody targeting complement C1s in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare immune-mediated disease of the peripheral nerves, with significant unmet treatment needs. Clinical trials in CIDP are challenging; thus, new trial designs are needed. We present design of an open-label phase 2 study (NCT04658472) evaluating efficacy and safety of SAR445088, a monoclonal antibody targeting complement C1s, in CIDP. METHODS: This phase 2, proof-of-concept, multicenter, open-label trial will evaluate the efficacy, and safety of SAR445088 in 90 patients with CIDP across three groups: (1) currently treated with standard-of-care (SOC) therapies, including immunoglobulin or corticosteroids (SOC-Treated); (2) refractory to SOC (SOC-Refractory); and (3) naïve to SOC (SOC-Naïve). Enrolled participants undergo a 24-week treatment period (part A), followed by an optional treatment extension for up to an additional 52 weeks (part B). In part A, the primary endpoint for the SOC-Treated group is the percentage of participants with a relapse after switching from SOC to SAR445088. The primary endpoint for the SOC-Refractory and SOC-Naïve groups is the percentage of participants with a response, compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints include safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of SAR445088 during 12-week overlapping period (SOC-Treated). Part B evaluates long-term safety and durability of efficacy. Data analysis will be performed using Bayesian statistics (predefined efficacy thresholds) and historical data-based placebo assumptions to support program decision-making. INTERPRETATION: This innovative trial design based on patient groups and Bayesian statistics provides an efficient paradigm to evaluate new treatment candidates across the CIDP spectrum and can help accelerate development of new therapies.

Nodal-paranodal antibodies in HIV-immune mediated radiculo-neuropathies: Clinical phenotypes and relevance.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of nodal-paranodal antibodies in HIV-infected patients with chronic immune-mediated radiculo-neuropathies (IMRN) has not been previously described. METHODS: HIV-infected patients who met the inclusion criteria for chronic IMRN were screened for immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies directed against nodal (neurofascin (NF)186) and paranodal (NF155, contactin-1 (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein(Caspr1)) cell adhesion molecules, using a live, cell-based assay. To explore potential pathogenicity, binding of human IgG to myelinated co-cultures was assessed by incubation with patients' sera positive for nodal or paranodal antibodies. Normal human serum was added as a source of complement to assess for complement activation as a mechanism for myelin injury. RESULTS: Twenty-four HIV-infected patients with IMRN were included in the study, 15 with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), 4 with ventral root radiculopathies (VRR), and 5 with dorsal root ganglionopathies (DRG). Five patients with CIDP had combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD). Three patients (12.7%) tested positive for neurofascin IgG1 antibodies in the following categories: 1 patient with VRR was NF186 positive, and 2 patients were NF155 positive with DRG and mixed sensory-motor demyelinating neuropathy with optic neuritis, respectively. CONCLUSION: The frequency of nodal-paranodal antibodies is similar among IMRN regardless of HIV status. Interpretation of the results in the context of HIV is challenging as there is uncertainty regarding pathogenicity of the antibodies, especially at low titres. Larger prospective immune studies are required to delineate pathogenicity in the context of HIV, and to establish a panel of antibodies to predict for a particular clinical phenotype.

Hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin 10% as maintenance therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: The ADVANCE-CIDP 1 randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ADVANCE-CIDP 1 evaluated facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG; human immunoglobulin G 10% with recombinant human hyaluronidase) efficacy and safety in preventing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) relapse. METHODS: ADVANCE-CIDP 1 was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 54 sites in 21 countries. Eligible adults had definite or probable CIDP and adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scores of 0-7 (inclusive), and received stable intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for ≥12 weeks before screening. After stopping IVIG, patients were randomized 1:1 to fSCIG 10% or placebo for 6 months or until relapse/discontinuation. fSCIG 10% was administered at the same dose (or matching placebo volume) and interval as pre-randomization IVIG. The primary outcome was patient proportion experiencing CIDP relapse (≥1-point increase in adjusted INCAT score from pre-subcutaneous treatment baseline) in the modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included time to relapse and safety endpoints. RESULTS: Overall, 132 patients (mean age 54.4 years, 56.1% male) received fSCIG 10% (n = 62) or placebo (n = 70). CIDP relapse was reduced with fSCIG 10% versus placebo (n = 6 [9.7%; 95% confidence interval 4.5%, 19.6%] vs n = 22 [31.4%; 21.8%, 43.0%], respectively; absolute difference: -21.8% [-34.5%, -7.9%], p = .0045). Relapse probability was higher with placebo versus fSCIG 10% over time (p = .002). Adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with fSCIG 10% (79.0% of patients) than placebo (57.1%), but severe (1.6% vs 8.6%) and serious AEs (3.2% vs 7.1%) were less common. INTERPRETATION: fSCIG 10% more effectively prevented CIDP relapse than placebo, supporting its potential use as maintenance CIDP treatment.

Withdrawal of intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Intravenous immunoglobulins are an efficacious treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Biomarkers for disease activity are lacking, making the need for ongoing treatment difficult to assess, leading to potential overtreatment and high health-care costs. Our objective was to determine whether intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal is non-inferior to continuing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and to determine how often patients are overtreated. We performed a randomized, double-blind, intravenous immunoglobulin-controlled non-inferiority trial in seven centres in the Netherlands (Trial registration: ISRCTN 13637698; www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13637698). Adults with clinically stable chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy using intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance treatment for at least 6 months were included. Patients received either intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal (placebo) as investigational treatment or continuation of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (control). The primary outcome was the mean change in logit scores from baseline to 24-week follow-up on the patient-reported Inflammatory Rasch-Overall Disability Scale. The non-inferiority margin was predefined as between-group difference in mean change scores of -0.65. Patients who deteriorated could reach a relapse end point according to predefined criteria. Patients with a relapse end point after intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal entered a restabilization phase. All patients from the withdrawal group who remained stable were included in an open-label extension phase of 52 weeks. We included 60 patients, of whom 29 were randomized to intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal and 31 to continuation of treatment. The mean age was 58 years (SD 14.7) and 67% was male. The between-group difference in mean change Inflammatory Rasch-Overall Disability Scale scores was -0.47 (95% CI -1.24 to 0.31), indicating that non-inferiority of intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal could not be established. In the intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal group, 41% remained stable for 24 weeks, compared to 58% in the intravenous immunoglobulin continuation group (-17%; 95% CI -39 to 8). Of the intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal group, 28% remained stable at the end of the extension phase. Of the patients in the restabilization phase, 94% restabilized within 12 weeks. In conclusion, it remains inconclusive whether intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal is non-inferior compared to continuing treatment, partly due to larger than expected confidence intervals leading to an underpowered study. Despite these limitations, a considerable proportion of patients could stop treatment and almost all patients who relapsed were restabilized quickly. Unexpectedly, a high proportion of intravenous immunoglobulin-treated patients experienced a relapse end point, emphasizing the need for more objective measures for disease activity in future trials, as the patient-reported outcome measures might not have been able to identify true relapses reliably. Overall, this study suggests that withdrawal attempts are safe and should be performed regularly in clinically stable patients.