Electrophysiological characteristics of epicardial to endocardial breakthrough in intractable cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial to endocardial breakthrough (EEB) exists widely in atrial arrhythmia and is a cause for intractable cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). This study aimed to investigate the electrophysiological features of EEB in EEB-related CTI dependent AFL. METHODS: Six patients with EEB-related CTI-dependent AFL were identified among 142 consecutive patients who underwent CTI-dependent AFL catheter ablation with an ultra-high-density, high-resolution mapping system in three institutions. Activation maps and ablation procedure were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of seven EEBs were found in six patients. Four EEBs (including three at the right atrial septum and one in paraseptal isthmus) were recorded in three patients during tachycardia. The other three EEBs were identified at the inferolateral right atrium (RA) during pacing from the coronary sinus. The conduction characteristics through the EEB-mediated structures were evaluated in three patients. Two patients only showed unidirectional conduction. Activation maps indicated that CTI-dependent AFL with EEB at the atrial septum was actually bi-atrial macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia (BiAT). Intensive ablation at the central isthmus could block CTI bidirectionally in four cases. However, ablation targeted at the inferolateral RA EEB was required in two cases. Meanwhile, local potentials at the EEB location gradually split into two components with a change in activation sequence. CONCLUSIONS: EEB is an underlying cause for intractable CTI-dependent AFL. EEB-mediated structure might show unidirectional conduction. CTI-dependent AFL with EEB at the atrial septum may represent BiAT. Intensive ablation targeting the central isthmus or EEB at the inferolateral RA could block the CTI bidirectionally.

Implantable loop recorder for augmenting detection of new-onset atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with typical atrial flutter (AFL) undergoing successful cavotricuspid isthmus ablation remain at risk for future development of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). Conventional monitoring (CM) techniques have shown AF incidence rates of 18%-50% in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether continuous monitoring using implantable loop recorders (ILRs) would enhance AF detection in this patient population. METHODS: Veteran patients undergoing AFL ablation between 2002 and 2019 who completed at least 6 months of follow-up after the ablation procedure were included. We compared new-onset AF detection between those who underwent CM and those who received ILRs immediately following AFL ablation. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients (age: 66 ± 9 years; all male) participated. CM was used in 172 (79%) and ILR in 45 (21%) patients. Median follow-up duration after ablation was 4.1 years. Seventy-nine patients (36%) developed new-onset AF, which was detected by CM in 51 and ILR in 28 (30% vs 62%, respectively, P < .001). AF detection occurred at 7.7 months (IQR: 4.7-17.5) after AFL ablation in the ILR group vs 41 months (IQR: 23-72) in the CM group (P < .001). Eleven patients (5%) experienced cerebrovascular events (all in the CM group) and only 4 of these patients (36%) were on long-term anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing AFL ablation remain at an increased risk of developing new-onset AF, which is detected sooner and more frequently by ILR than by CM. Improving AF detection may allow optimization of rhythm management strategies and anticoagulation in this patient population.