RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Disparities in hypertension control are well documented but underaddressed. METHODS: RICH LIFE (Reducing Inequities in Care of Hypertension: Lifestyle Improvement for Everyone) was a 2-arm, cluster randomized trial comparing the effect on blood pressure (BP) control (systolic BP ≤140 mm Hg, diastolic BP ≤90 mm Hg), patient activation, and disparities in BP control of 2 multilevel interventions, standard of care plus (SCP) and collaborative care/stepped care (CC/SC). SCP included BP measurement standardization, audit and feedback, and equity-leadership training. CC/SC added roles to address social or medical needs. Primary outcomes were BP control and patient activation at 12 months. Generalized estimating equations and mixed-effects regression models with fixed effects of time, intervention, and their interaction compared change in outcomes at 12 months from baseline. RESULTS: A total of 1820 adults with uncontrolled BP and ≥1 other risk factors enrolled in the study. Their mean age was 60.3 years, and baseline BP was 152.3/85.5 mm Hg; 59.4% were women; 57.4% were Black, 33.2% were White, and 9.4% were Hispanic; 74% had hyperlipidemia; and 45.1% had type 2 diabetes. CC/SC did not improve BP control rates more than SCP. Both groups achieved statistically and clinically significant BP control rates at 12 months (CC/SC: 57.3% [95% CI, 52.7%-62.0%]; SCP: 56.7% [95% CI, 51.9%-61.5%]). Pairwise comparisons between racial and ethnic groups showed overall no significant differences in BP control at 12 months. Patients with coronary heart disease showed greater achievement of BP control in CC/SC than in SCP (64.0% [95% CI, 54.1%-73.9%] versus 50.8% [95% CI, 42.6%-59.0%]; P=0.04), as did patients in rural areas (67.3% [95% CI, 49.8%-84.8%] versus 47.8% [95% CI, 32.4%-63.2%]; P=0.01). Individuals in both arms experienced statistically and clinically significant reductions in mean systolic BP (CC/SC: -13.8 mm Hg [95% CI, -15.2 to -12.5]; SCP: -14.6 mm Hg [95% CI, -15.9 to -13.2]) and diastolic BP (CC/SC: -6.9 mm Hg [95% CI, -7.8 to -6.1]; SCP: -5.5 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.4 to -4.6]) over time. The difference in diastolic BP reduction between CC/SC and SCP over time was statistically significant (-1.4 mm Hg [95% CI, -2.6 to -0.2). Patient activation did not differ between arms. CC/SC showed greater improvements in patient ratings of chronic illness care (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care score) over 12 months (0.12 [95% CI, 0.02-0.22]). CONCLUSIONS: Adding a collaborative care team to enhanced standard of care did not improve BP control but did improve patient ratings of chronic illness care.
Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Hipertensión , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Humanos , Hipertensión/terapia , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) face increasing regulatory scrutiny, and the performance of predictive models used to assess OPO performance is critical. We sought to determine whether adding deceased donor physiological and critical care data to the existing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) heart yield model would improve the model's performance. Donor data and heart transplanted (yes/no), the outcome of interest, were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Management Goal (DMG) Registry for 19 141 donors after brain death, from 25 OPOs. The data were split into training and testing portions. Multivariable LASSO regression was used to develop a statistical model incorporating DMG data elements with the existing components of the SRTR model. The DMG + SRTR and SRTR models were applied to the test data to compare the predictive performance of the models. The sensitivity (84%-86%) and specificity (84%-86%) were higher for the DMG + SRTR model compared to the SRTR model (71%-75% and 76%-77%, respectively). For the DMG + SRTR model, the C-statistic was 0.92 to 0.93 compared to 0.80 to 0.81 for the SRTR model. DMG data elements improve the predictive performance of the heart yield model. The addition of DMG data elements to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data collection requirements should be considered.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the amount of unnecessary antibiotics, in particular ceftriaxone, given to men who have sex with men (MSM) with anogenital symptoms as part of presumptive management in an urban sexual health clinic and examine factors associated with unnecessary ceftriaxone. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of electronic records from all visits involving MSM reporting symptoms of bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) and who received presumptive antibiotics at Sydney Sexual Health Centre. The following variables were extracted: demographic and sexual behaviour data, presenting symptoms, prior STI diagnoses, use of anoscopy, use of point-of-care microscopy, prescriptions of antibiotics and subsequent nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) results for chlamydia and gonorrhoea in all anatomical sites (urethra, pharynx and rectum). We defined unnecessary antibiotic as an agent prescribed to treat an STI organism that was subsequently not detected. RESULTS: Among 1061 visits in this analysis, 41.8% yielded negative NAAT results for both chlamydia and gonorrhoea in all anatomical sites. There were 44.3% of visits which had positive gonorrhoea NAAT result in at least one anatomical site. There were 187 courses of ceftriaxone prescribed in patients who tested negative for gonorrhoea in all anatomical sites and therefore were unnecessary. Unnecessary ceftriaxone prescribing occurred in 50.2% of visits with anorectal symptoms, 19.6% of scrotal symptoms and 7.3% of urethral symptoms. Microscopy was associated with significantly less unnecessary ceftriaxone in urethral but not anorectal or scrotal presentations. In multivariable analysis, the following factors were associated with a higher likelihood of unnecessary ceftriaxone use: anorectal symptoms, scrotal symptoms, gonorrhoea in the preceding year, contact of a bacterial STI and living with HIV. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significant amount of unnecessary ceftriaxone used for STI symptoms in MSM. A new pathway incorporating rapid point-of-care molecular testing in symptomatic patients may improve the precision of antibiotic prescribing and reduce unnecessary use.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study investigates how the COVID-19 pandemic (CP) impacted the timeline between initial diagnosis (ID) of prostate carcinoma and subsequent therapy consultation (TC) or radical prostatectomy (RP) due to the implementation of a "minimal contact concept," which postponed clinical examinations until the day of admission. METHODS: We analyzed patient data from a tertiary care center from 2018 to September 2021. The focus was on comparing the time intervals from ID to TC and from ID to RP before and during the CP. RESULTS: Of 12,255 patients, 6,073 (61.6%) were treated before and 3,791 (38.4%) during the CP. The median time from ID to TC reduced from 37 days (IQR: 21 - 58d) pre-CP to 32 days (IQR: 20 - 50d) during CP (p < 0.001). Similarly, the time from ID to RP decreased from 98 days (IQR: 70 - 141d) to 75 days (IQR: 55 - 108d; p < 0.001) during the CP. There was a significant decrease in low-risk tumor cases at ID (18.9% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.003) and post-RP (4% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.001) during the CP. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic facilitated more timely treatment of prostate cancer, suggesting potential benefits for both low-risk and aggressive tumor management through expedited clinical procedures.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Anciano , Prostatectomía/métodos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Consejo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells are a promising new immunotherapy for haematological malignancies. Six CAR-T cells products are currently available for adult patients with refractory or relapsed high-grade B cell malignancies, but they are associated with severe life-threatening toxicities and side effects that may require admission to ICU. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this short pragmatic review is to synthesize for intensivists the knowledge on CAR-T cell therapy with emphasis on CAR-T cell-induced toxicities and ICU management of complications according to international recommendations, outcomes and future issues.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Adulto , Humanos , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéutico , Linfocitos B , Cuidados Críticos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Linfocitos TRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Family caregivers of persons with dementia are faced with complex caregiving management needs. This study had two aims: (1) to identify caregiving management needs of family caregivers of persons with dementia and (2) identify any variables that might influence these needs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited family caregivers of persons with dementia (N = 250) through referrals from clinicians at a dementia outpatient clinic in Northern Taiwan. Data were collected with a 32-item researcher-developed instrument, the Caregiving Management Needs Scale (CMNS), to identify management needs specific to family caregivers of persons with dementia. The CMNS was comprised of questions about the types of assistance or support family caregivers would like to receive to facilitate caregiving. RESULTS: CMNS scores indicated caregivers had moderate management needs. Caregivers of relatives with a moderate severity of dementia had significantly higher scores on the CMNS compared with caregivers of persons with very mild dementia (p < 0.01). Linear regression analysis indicated significant predictors of high caregiving management needs were caregivers who were female (p < 0.01), and persons with dementia with behavioral problems (p < 0.01), low scores for Activities of Daily Living (p < 0.01), regular medication adherence (p < 0.01), and use of long-term care services (p < 0.001) were significant (F[13, 236] = 7.12; p < 0.001; R2 = 28.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding variables and predictors of caregiving management needs for family caregivers could reduce the complexity of caregiving. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05151185.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Demencia , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Cuidadores/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Demencia/terapia , Demencia/psicología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Taiwán/epidemiología , Adulto , Evaluación de Necesidades , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Familia/psicologíaRESUMEN
Rheumatoid arthritis causes progressive joint destruction in the long term, causing a deterioration of the foot and ankle. A clinical practice guideline has been created with the main objective of providing recommendations in the field of podiatry for the conservative management of rheumatoid arthritis. Thus, healthcare professionals involved in foot care of adults with rheumatoid arthritis will be able to follow practical recommendations. A clinical practice guideline was created including a group of experts (podiatrists, rheumatologists, nurses, an orthopaedic surgeon, a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist and patient with rheumatoid arthritis). Methodological experts using GRADE were tasked with systematically reviewing the available scientific evidence and developing the information which serves as a basis for the expert group to make recommendations. Key findings include the efficacy of chiropody in alleviating hyperkeratotic lesions and improving short-term pain and functionality. Notably, custom and standardized foot orthoses demonstrated significant benefits in reducing foot pain, enhancing physical function, and improving life quality. Therapeutic footwear was identified as crucial for pain reduction and mobility improvement, emphasizing the necessity for custom-made options tailored to individual patient needs. Surgical interventions were recommended for cases which were non-responsive to conservative treatments, aimed at preserving foot functionality and reducing pain. Moreover, self-care strategies and education were underscored as essential components for promoting patient independence and health maintenance. A series of recommendations have been created which will help professionals and patients to manage podiatric pathologies derived from rheumatoid arthritis.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Ortesis del Pié , Articulación del Tobillo , Pie , Podiatría/normas , ConsensoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The care organization of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) varies by country according to the health care system. This study used a large sample of French individuals with severe PIMD/polyhandicap to assess: 1) the adequacy of care setting over a 5-year period and 2) health care consumption. METHODS: The longitudinal study used data from the French EVALuation PoLyHandicap (EVAL-PLH) cohort of persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap who were receiving managed in specialized care centres and residential facilities. Two assessments were performed: wave 1 (T1) in 2015-2016 and wave 2 (T2) in 2020-2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion younger than 3 years old; and severe PIMD. The adequacy of the care setting was based on the following: i) objective indicators, i.e., adequacy for age and adequacy for health status severity; ii) subjective indicators, i.e., self-perception of the referring physician about medical care adequacy and educational care adequacy. Health care consumption was assessed based on medical and paramedical care. RESULTS: Among the 492 persons assessed at the 2 times, 50% of individuals at T1 and 46% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting based on age and severity. Regarding global subjective inadequacy, the combination of medical adequacy and educational adequacy, 7% of individuals at T1 and 13% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting. At T2, a majority of individuals were undermonitored by medical care providers (general practitioners, physical medicine rehabilitation physicians, neurologists, orthopaedists, etc.). Important gaps were found between performed and prescribed sessions of various paramedical care (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychomotor therapy, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed key elements of inadequate care management for persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap in France. Based on these important findings, healthcare workers, familial caregivers, patients experts, and health decision-makers should develop appropriate care organizations to optimize the global care management of these individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02400528, registered 27/03/2015.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Discapacidad Intelectual , Preescolar , Humanos , Atención a la Salud , Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Estado de Salud , Discapacidad Intelectual/terapia , Estudios LongitudinalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic has tested health care organizations worldwide. Responses have demonstrated great variation and Sweden has been an outlier in terms of both strategy and how it was enacted, making it an interesting case for further study. The aim of this study was to explore how health care leaders experienced the challenges and responses that emerged during the initial wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, and to analyze these experiences through an organizational resilience lens. METHODS: A qualitative interview study with 12 senior staff members who worked directly with or supervised pandemic efforts. Transcripts were analyzed using traditional content analysis and the codes directed to the Integrated Resilience Attributes Framework to understand what contributed to or hindered organizational resilience, i.e. how organizations achieve their goals by utilizing existing resources during crises. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Organizational resilience was found at the micro (situated) and meso (structural) system levels as individuals and organizations dealt with acute shortages and were forced to rapidly adapt through individual sacrifices, resource management, process management, and communications and relational capacity. Poor systemic resilience related to misaligned responses and a lack of learning from previous experiences, negatively impacted the anticipatory phase and placed greater pressure on individuals and organizations to respond. Conventional crisis leadership could hamper innovation, further cement chronic challenges, and generate a moral tension between centralized directives and clinical microsystem experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic tested the resilience of the health care system, placing undue pressure on micro and meso systems responses. With improved learning capabilities, some of this pressure may be mitigated as it could raise the anticipatory resilience potential, i.e. with better health systems learning, we may need fewer heroes. How crisis leadership could better align decision-making with frontline needs and temper short-term acute needs with a longer-term infinite mindset is worth further study.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Resiliencia Psicológica , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Liderazgo , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lesotho experienced high rates of maternal (566/100,000 live births) and under-five mortality (72.9/1000 live births). A 2013 national assessment found centralized healthcare management in Ministry of Health led to fragmented, ineffective district health team management. Launched in 2014 through collaboration between the Ministry of Health and Partners In Health, Lesotho's Primary Health Care Reform (LPHCR) aimed to improve service quality and quantity by decentralizing healthcare management to the district level. We conducted a qualitative study to explore health workers' perceptions regarding the effectiveness of LPHCR in enhancing the primary health care system. METHODS: We conducted 21 semi-structured key informant interviews (KII) with healthcare workers and Ministry of Health officials purposively sampled from various levels of Lesotho's health system, including the central Ministry of Health, district health management teams, health centers, and community health worker programs in four pilot districts of the LPHCR initiative. The World Health Organization's health systems building blocks framework was used to guide data collection and analysis. Interviews assessed health care workers' perspectives on the impact of the LPHCR initiative on the six-health system building blocks: service delivery, health information systems, access to essential medicines, health workforce, financing, and leadership/governance. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS: Participants described benefits of decentralization, including improved efficiency in service delivery, enhanced accountability and responsiveness, increased community participation, improved data availability, and better resource allocation. Participants highlighted how the reform resulted in more efficient procurement and distribution processes and increased recognition and status in part due to the empowerment of district health management teams. However, participants also identified limited decentralization of financial decision-making and encountered barriers to successful implementation, such as staff shortages, inadequate management of the village health worker program, and a lack of clear communication regarding autonomy in utilizing and mobilizing donor funds. CONCLUSION: Our study findings indicate that the implementation of decentralized primary health care management in Lesotho was associated a positive impact on health system building blocks related to primary health care. However, it is crucial to address the implementation challenges identified by healthcare workers to optimize the benefits of decentralized healthcare management.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Lesotho , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Femenino , Personal de Salud/psicología , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Política , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , AdultoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Examine the understanding of terminologies and management patterns of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in six territories in Asia-Pacific. METHODS: This study involved two phases: (1) a survey with 32 urologists and 7 medical oncologists (MOs) and (2) a factorial experiment and in-depth interviews with 23 urologists and 2 MOs. All clinicians had ≥8 years' experience managing NMIBC patients in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan. Data from Phase 1 were summarized using descriptive statistics; content and thematic analyses applied in Phase 2. RESULTS: In phase 1, 35% of clinicians defined BCG-unresponsive as BCG-refractory, -relapse and -resistant, 6% defined it as BCG-refractory and -relapse; 22% classified BCG-failure as BCG-refractory, -relapse, -resistant, and when muscle-invasive bladder cancer is detected. If eligible and willing, 50% (interquartile range [IQR], 50%-80%) of BCG-unresponsive patients would undergo radical cystectomy (RC), and 50% (IQR 20%-50%) of RC-eligible patients would receive bladder-sparing treatment or surveillance. In phase 2, we found that 32%, 88%, and 48% of clinicians, respectively, used "BCG-unresponsive," "BCG-refractory," and "BCG-relapse" in clinical practice but with no consistent interpretation of the terms. Compared with EAU definitions, 8%-60% of clinicians appropriately classified 9 tumor types that are persistent or recurrent after adequate BCG. Fifty percent of clinicians mentioned a lack of bladder-preserving treatment that outperforms RC in quality of life as a reason to retreat BCG-unresponsive patients with BCG. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed varied understanding and application of BCG-unresponsive terminologies in practice. There is a need for a uniform and simple definition of BCG-unresponsive disease in Asia-Pacific.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Vesicales sin Invasión Muscular , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Vacuna BCG/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia , Hong Kong , Administración Intravesical , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the perception of self-efficacy on the health professionals of the Spanish out-of-hospital emergency services. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional and descriptive with a survey methodology of 1710 participants from Spain (1 February-30 April, 2021). METHODS: The mental health of healthcare workers was assesed in terms of stress, anxiety and depression, as well as their self-efficacy. Linear and logistic regression models were fitted to predict these variables. A moderation analysis was conducted to determine the effect of self-efficacy on mental health. RESULTS: The means of the sample for stress, anxiety, depression and self-efficacy were 20.60, 15.74, 13.07 and 70.87, respectively. In the regression models, being a woman was the most significant factor for severe mental health impairment. Female gender was also a relevant factor for self-efficacy. Self-efficacy had a direct effect on the mental health for working in patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare workers showed moderate stress, severe anxiety, mild depression and good self-efficacy. Direct patient care was associated with more stress and severe anxiety. Age, female gender, job changes and job adjustment were associated with levels of stress, anxiety and depression. Self-efficacy is a determining factor of mental health in the direct care modality. IMPLICATIONS: The mental health of healthcare workers has been of great importance in the aftermath of the pandemic, but out-of-hospital emergency workers have been neglected in research. The levels of stress, anxiety and depression during the pandemic justify the creation of prevention and early diagnosis programmes, as they are essential in a health disaster. Surprisingly, their high level of perceived self-efficacy directly impact on the mental health of patient helthcare workers, so improving it will reduce the psychological risk. REPORTING METHOD: We have followed the STROBE guidelines. It has been partially funded by the Asistencia Sanitanitaria Interprovincial de Seguros - ASISA Foundation (Spain). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: 'No patient or public involvement'.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Autoeficacia , Humanos , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , España , Personal de Salud/psicología , Pandemias , Ansiedad/psicología , Salud Mental , SARS-CoV-2 , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has historically been reported as costly and time-consuming, with low compliance rates that may impact reimbursement. Little research has reported the effects of mobile applications to support PROMs collection following arthroplasty. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty were randomized to utilize a smartphone-based care management platform (app) for self-directed rehabilitation and completed joint-specific PROMs (Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score, Joint Replacement) via the application at prescribed intervals or on paper during clinic visits. Control patients received practice standard of care, and completed PROMs via emailed hyperlink or during clinic visits following lower limb arthroplasty. Overall, 455 patients underwent knee arthroplasty procedures (245 control, 210 app group) and 380 underwent total hip arthroplasty (206 control, 174 app group). Compliance with expected PROMs completion was calculated through one year postoperatively. RESULTS: Compliance was higher in the app group preoperatively in both knee (98.1 versus 86.9%, P < .0001) and hip cohorts (96.0 versus 88.4%, P = .008), and postoperatively, including at one year (knees, 72.2 versus 53.7%, P < .0001; hips, 71.1 versus 49.2%, P < .0001). On log-binomial regressions, intervention arm was the strongest predictor of completion of all PROMs, where app users undergoing knee (Relative Risk 2.039, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.595 to 2.607, P < .000) and hip arthroplasty (2.268 95% CI 1.742 to 2.953, P < .0001) were more likely to be compliant at all timepoints. The majority of patients in the app group, including those over 65 years of age, completed PROMs using the application as opposed to paper methods. CONCLUSIONS: A smartphone mobile application that engages patients during recovery after knee and hip joint arthroplasty improved compliance with completion of preoperative and postoperative PROMs compared to other electronic and paper methods.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Aplicaciones Móviles , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Teléfono Inteligente , Cooperación del Paciente , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugíaRESUMEN
AIMS: To determine the relationship between perception of COVID-19, fear of COVID-19 and self-care management in individuals with chronic diseases during the pandemic process. BACKGROUND: Individuals with chronic diseases are a sensitive group during the COVID-19 pandemic process; it is thought that self-care management may be adversely affected as a result of their more intense exposure to the psychological, physiological and economic effects of the pandemic. In the literature, there is no study examining the effect of perception of COVID-19 and fear of COVID-19 on self-care management in individuals with chronic diseases. DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHODS: The study was conducted with 322 individuals who applied to the internal medicine outpatient clinics of a university's Health Practice and Research Center, met the inclusion criteria, agreed to participate in the study and had a chronic disease. Questionnaire form, Perception of COVID-19 Scale (P-COVID-19), The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) and Self-Care Management Process in Chronic Illness Scale (SCMP-G) were used to collect data. STROBE checklist was used to report the present study. RESULTS: In the study, it can be stated that individuals with chronic diseases had a moderate to the high perception of contagiousness and dangerousness of COVID-19, they had a moderate-high level of fear of COVID-19 and their self-care care management was above moderate level. There was a significant positive correlation between P-COVID-19, FCV-19S and SCMP-G in the study. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that the perception of COVID-19 contagiousness and the fear of COVID-19 had a positive effect on the self-care management of individuals with chronic diseases. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Determining the level of COVID-19 perception and fear of COVID-19 and their effects on the life of the individual, and evaluating self-care management during the difficult pandemic process will increase the success in the holistic nursing care and management of chronic diseases.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Turquía/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Autocuidado , Miedo , Enfermedad Crónica , PercepciónRESUMEN
Introduction: To examine telehealth use in chronic care management and disparity reduction among the aging population. Methods: This longitudinal cohort study compared the changes in chronic care quality measures among patients with and without telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic relative to patients in the previous years and by patient sociodemographic subgroup. Participants were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years or older from an Accountable Care Organization in the Midwest United States. Three utilization-based measures included having 2+ A1C tests, breast cancer screening, and depression screening. Three outcome-based measures included A1C control, blood pressure control, and depression diagnosis. Results: During the study period, the pandemic cohort experienced 5-17 percentage points' decrease in utilization-based measures (e.g., 2+ A1C tests 63.9% vs. 51.1%; OR [95% confidence intervals] = 0.35 [0.34-0.36]) from baseline relative to the control cohort. The outcome-based measures also significantly decreased but at smaller magnitudes (3-5 percentage points). About 51.5% patients had at least one telehealth visit. The utilization-based measures for these patients were significantly higher than those without any telehealth visit (e.g., 2+ A1C 57.1% vs. 51.1%, p < 0.01). However, the outcome-based measures were comparable. Patients from historically underserved groups had a larger decline in health care outcomes than their counterparts. Among patient with at least one telehealth visit, these disparities were no longer significant. Discussions: Telehealth was associated with less negative impact of the pandemic and better performance in chronic care management, but more for utilization-based measures and less for outcome-based measures. Telehealth was also associated with less disparities in care outcomes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Medicare , Telemedicina , Humanos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Estudios Longitudinales , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pandemias , Medio Oeste de Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evaluating patients' satisfaction after received care for temporomandibular disorders (TMD) pain provides oral health care professionals with knowledge and tools to improve their clinical procedures. However, knowledge on patient characteristics that determine satisfaction with the received care for TMD pain is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To identify potential baseline predictors for patients' satisfaction regarding the management of TMD pain upon treatment completion in a referral clinic. METHODS: Eligible patients, viz., individuals of ≥16 years of age, with a TMD-pain diagnosis according the diagnostic criteria for TMD (DC/TMD), and who were treated in a referral clinic, were included. As part of their standard care, a set of diagnostic questionnaires was filled in (e.g. TMD-pain screener, graded chronic pain scale (GCPS), etc.). After completion of the received care, patients filled in a custom-made questionnaire based on patient reported experience measures (PREMs) to quantify their satisfaction with their treatment results and received care. To identify potential predictors associated with patients' satisfaction, univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (mean 39.6, SD 15.0) were included in this study. Overall, the patients were satisfied with the treatment results and the received care. Depressive feelings were negatively associated with satisfaction of treatment results (p = .01) and positively associated with satisfaction of received care (p = .01), while pain intensity was negatively associated with satisfaction of the received care. CONCLUSION: Depressive feelings are a significant negative predictor of patients' satisfaction with the treatment result for TMD pain, while average pain intensity is a significant negative predictor of patients' satisfaction with the received care.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Dolor Facial/terapia , Dolor Facial/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/terapia , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to demonstrate the compliance, feasibility, and acceptability of telehealth monitoring among surgical patients discharged with wounds or drains. METHODOLOGY: This is a cross-sectional feasibility study. Post-surgical breast, plastic, and hepatobiliary patients with wounds and/or surgical drains were recruited using convenience sampling. The control group received conventional care which consisted of daily telephone follow-up. The intervention group used a mobile wound application to take wound and drain images, report drainage amount and symptoms. Compliance was assessed by measuring the percentage of actual to expected patient entries, feasibility was assessed by comparing detection of abnormalities and unexpected hospital visits, and acceptability was assessed by subjective feedback from nurses and patients from the intervention group. RESULTS: 59 patients were recruited, with 30 patients in the control group and 29 patients in the intervention group. 9 specialty nurses were involved in the patients' post-discharge care. The mean compliance rate for the hepatobiliary, breast and plastic patients were 89.9 %, 89.5 % and 75.9 % respectively. 4 patients from the intervention group (13.8 %) and 6 patients from the control group (20.1 %) were flagged as having potential abnormalities. As for unexpected hospital visits, there were 2 (6.9 %) in the intervention group and 1 (3.4 %) in the control group. 25 patients and 9 specialty nurses responded to the feedback survey. 22 patients (88 %) did not face any application issues. 18 patients (72 %) preferred to self-report symptoms via the application rather than to call the nurses and reported feeling safe knowing that they are remotely monitored. Most nurses found the app convenient and timesaving (n = 7, 78 %), with monitoring through pictures as more accurate than phone conversation (n = 8, 89 %). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that use of a mobile application by surgical patients discharged with wounds or drains is feasible and serves as a viable monitoring tool.
RESUMEN
Children and youth with special health care needs often undergo a higher frequency of sedated procedures, increasing their risk for complications, prolonged hospitalizations, as well as increased time and cost burdens. By consolidating multiple procedures requiring anesthetic sedation, the risk and cost can be reduced for both families and health care systems. In this paper, we discuss an innovative model to coordinate procedures across internal and external providers to improve quality of care for this vulnerable patient population. Although preliminary, our findings suggest this approach may be beneficial to both the patient, family, and health system.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Adolescente , Niño , HumanosRESUMEN
A companion robot named Hyodol is a digital technology implemented for eldercare in South Korea. Drawing insights from semi-structured interviews with public social workers actively involved in the Hyodol care program, this study explores how social workers contribute to the success of the robotic care program. Throughout the phases of selecting potential users, introducing older adults to the robot, and maintaining the robotic program, the practical wisdom of social workers plays an important role. Despite the increased workload in case management and the emotional labor associated with navigating the care system, these pioneering social workers maintained high morale to adopt the robotic care system. By shedding light on the specific roles of social workers, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the intricate dynamics that underlie successful robotic eldercare.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Anciano , Trabajadores Sociales , Emociones , República de CoreaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is one of the methods that has validity for evaluating the consciousness levels of patients in the literature and is accepted by health authorities. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of GCS in intensive care patients receiving palliative care. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cross sectional observational study. The study was conducted in a general intensive care unit with 20 beds with patients receiving palliative care. In the unit, 18 nurses worked in two shifts, day and night. Each patient's primary palliative care nurse and two additional researchers were given one minute to independently record the patient's GCS total and subscale scores. All observations were completed within 5 min as there could be significant changes in the patient's GCS score during observations. RESULTS: A total of 258 assessments were completed. For the GCS total scoring, a moderate agreement was found between palliative care nurses and the first researcher-observer (49.0%) and also between palliative care nurses and the second researcher-observer (47.7%). In addition, there was a substantial agreement between the first and second researchers (78.9%) and also between all observers (61.5%) (all p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a near-perfect agreement between the two researcher-observers, we found only moderate agreement among all observers (palliative care nurses and two researcher-observers) in the evaluation of GCS total and subscale scores. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: We found that lack of knowledge and training on the standardized use of GCS is still a problem for palliative and intensive care units. Because of the diversity of patients requiring GCS assessment in palliative care units, refresher training programs and hands-on workshops on consciousness assessment should be organized regularly for more experienced nurses.