Diagnosis and Management of Clip Artifact on Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Scars.

Delayed hemorrhage is the most common complication of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Studies have shown that prophylactic placement of hemostatic clips on certain EMR scars reduces the risk of delayed hemorrhage. During endoscopic follow-up, mucosal distortions induced by clip closure known as clip artifact can be visualized. Clip artifact can be confused with residual neoplastic polyp, potentially leading to unnecessary treatment and complications. Clip artifact can be classified into 3 different types: Type 1: the presence of inflammation associated with continued clip attachment; Type 2: the presence of inflammation that persists after clip detachment; and Type 3: the presence of noninflamed mucosal distortions after clip detachment. Differentiation of clip artifact from residual neoplasia relies on careful analysis of colonic pit patterns. Management varies greatly; clip artifact requires no treatment, whereas residual polyp requires resection. This article reviews clip artifact and introduces a classification scheme to help endoscopists with diagnosis and management.

Clip placement to prevent delayed bleeding after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (CLIPPER): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large colorectal polyps is in most cases the preferred treatment to prevent progression to colorectal carcinoma. The most common complication after EMR is delayed bleeding, occurring in 7% overall and in approximately 10% of polyps ≥ 2 cm in the proximal colon. Previous research has suggested that prophylactic clipping of the mucosal defect after EMR may reduce the incidence of delayed bleeding in polyps with a high bleeding risk. METHODS: The CLIPPER trial is a multicenter, parallel-group, single blinded, randomized controlled superiority study. A total of 356 patients undergoing EMR for large (≥ 2 cm) non-pedunculated polyps in the proximal colon will be included and randomized to the clip group or the control group. Prophylactic clipping will be performed in the intervention group to close the resection defect after the EMR with a distance of < 1 cm between the clips. Primary outcome is delayed bleeding within 30 days after EMR. Secondary outcomes are recurrent or residual polyps and clip artifacts during surveillance colonoscopy after 6 months, as well as cost-effectiveness of prophylactic clipping and severity of delayed bleeding. DISCUSSION: The CLIPPER trial is a pragmatic study performed in the Netherlands and is powered to determine the real-time efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic clipping after EMR of proximal colon polyps ≥ 2 cm in the Netherlands. This study will also generate new data on the achievability of complete closure and the effects of clip placement on scar surveillance after EMR, in order to further promote the debate on the role of prophylactic clipping in everyday clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03309683 . Registered on 13 October 2017. Start recruitment: 05 March 2018. Planned completion of recruitment: 31 August 2021.

1.5 Tesla Non-ultrashort but Short Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Angiography Describes the Arteries Near a Clipped Cerebral Aneurysm.

Cerebral aneurysm and mother artery assessment after clipping is essential to evaluate aneurysm remnant, regrowth, and clip slippage. Usually, cerebral angiography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) are used for the evaluation, but they have the side effect of contrast medium and are time-consuming. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is a non-invasive and fast modality, but clip-induced artifacts limit the signal near the metal clip. Recent ultrashort echo time (UTE)-MRA reduces metal artifacts but its availability is still low worldwide. Therefore, we developed a modified TOF-MRA sequence, named short TE-MRA, using Optima MR 360 1.5T Advance (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). It could describe the artery near the clip using general MRA equipment without recent UTE-MRA technology. We present a subarachnoid hemorrhage patient who underwent short TE-MRA about a year after clipping for the aneurysms at the bilateral internal carotid arteries. Short TE-MRA described the left internal carotid, middle cerebral, and anterior cerebral arteries. The right middle and anterior cerebral arteries were described, but the right internal carotid artery was not. Normal TOF-MRA could not describe them. Without recent UTE-MRA technology, short TE-MRA might be an alternative method for evaluating the artery near the clip. Short TE-MRA can be performed by general MRA equipment with a little time, so it may be helpful until UTE-MRA is widely used. Further research is needed on whether short TE-MRA can describe the aneurysm remnant, regrowth, and clip slippage up to the clinically useful level.