Development and validation of the positive evaluation core beliefs scale for social anxiety.

Fear of positive evaluation (FPE) is becoming recognised as an important component of social anxiety that is distinct from fear of negative evaluation (FNE). While core belief scales exist for fear of negative evaluation (FNE), none has been developed for FPE. Therefore, this paper describes the development and validation of a measure of core beliefs that is specific to FPE. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on 60 initial items with an Australian undergraduate sample, in which a confirmatory factor analysis was performed with an independent Australian general population sample. A series of further analyses were performed to test convergent and divergent validity. The Positive Evaluation Core Beliefs Scale (PECS) emerged as a 17-item two-factor psychometrically valid measure that correlates more strongly with measurement of FPE than FNE. The PECS measure offers a new opportunity for researchers and clinicians to better explore cognitions associated with social anxiety.

Increasing the Therapeutic Dosage by Combining Cognitive Behavior Group Therapy With a Monitored Self-Help Group.

Objective: A problem in psychotherapy is the limited availability of psychotherapists. This can not only delay the start of therapy but also curtail the number of sessions and the therapeutic dosage. An option to extend the therapeutic dose without an increase in therapist time may be to combine group psychotherapy with a self-help group. The goal of the present study is to investigate how patients judge this treatment mode and to what degree the contents of a regular group treatment are pursued in a parallel self-help group.Method: Seventy-two psychosomatic inpatients participated in cognitive behavior group therapy and parallel self-help group, which was monitored by the therapist during the regular group therapy sessions. Patients in both groups filled in a questionnaire that asked for the content of the group session, how patients had experienced the interaction, and what they had taken from the group.Results: Patients reported that in the self-help group, they discussed similar topics as in the regular group therapy, like how to deal with anxiety or sadness, how to interact with other people, and how to cope with their mental disorder and problems at work, in the family, or with friends. Patients indicated that there was more relaxed chatting in the self-help group, whereas learning new behavior was reported more frequently for the regular group therapy.Conclusions: In the regular group therapy and the guided self-help group, similar topics were discussed, which suggests that a combination of both can extend the therapeutic process and increase the therapeutic dosage without costs for the therapist or the institution.

Therapists' experiences of remotely delivering cognitive-behavioural or graded-exercise interventions for fatigue: a qualitative evaluation.

Objective: Fatigue is a challenging feature of all inflammatory rheumatic diseases. LIFT (Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a randomized Trial) included remotely delivered personalized exercise programme (PEP) or cognitive-behavioural approach (CBA) interventions. The aim of this nested qualitative evaluation was to understand rheumatology health professionals' (therapists') perspectives of delivering the interventions in the LIFT trial. Methods: A subgroup of therapists who had delivered the personalized exercise programme (PEP) and cognitive-behavioural approach (CBA) interventions took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. Results: Seventeen therapists (13 women and 4 men) who delivered PEP (n = 8) or CBA (n = 9) interventions participated. Five themes were identified. In 'The benefits of informative, structured training', therapists described how they were able to practice their skills, and the convenience of having the LIFT manual for reference. When 'Getting into the swing of it', supporting patients gave therapists the confidence to tailor the content of the manual to each patient. Clinical supervision supported therapists to gain feedback and request assistance when required. In 'Delivering the intervention', therapists reported that patients valued the opportunity to talk about their fatigue and challenge their beliefs. In 'Challenges in delivering the LIFT intervention', therapists struggled to work in partnership with patients who lacked motivation or stopped engaging. Finally, in 'LIFT developing clinical skills', therapists gained confidence and professional satisfaction, seeing patients' fatigue improve over time. Conclusion: The findings support the provision of training for rheumatology health professionals to remotely deliver fatigue-management interventions. Insights from these trials can be used to better improve clinical practice and service provision.

Remotely delivered cognitive-behavioural and personalized exercise interventions to lessen the impact of fatigue: a qualitative evaluation.

Objectives: Fatigue can be a disabling symptom of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. LIFT (Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a randomized Trial) is a randomized trial of remotely delivered cognitive-behavioural approach or personalized exercise programme interventions, compared with usual care. The aim of this nested qualitative study was to evaluate participants' experiences of taking part in the intervention, including their ideas about future service delivery. Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a subgroup of LIFT participants to discuss their views and experiences of the interventions. Results: Forty-three participants (30 women) from six sites who had participated in the cognitive-behavioural approach (n = 22) or personalized exercise programme (n = 21) interventions took part. Five themes were identified in the thematic analysis. In the theme 'not a miracle cure, but a way to better manage fatigue', LIFT could not cure fatigue; however, most felt better able to manage after participating. Participants valued 'building a therapeutic relationship' with the same therapist throughout the intervention. In 'structure, self-monitoring and being accountable', participants liked the inclusion of goal-setting techniques and were motivated by reporting back to the therapist.After taking part in the interventions, participants felt 'better equipped to cope with fatigue'; more confident and empowered. Lastly, participants shared ideas for 'a tailored programme delivered remotely', including follow-up sessions, video calling, and group-based sessions for social support. Conclusion: Many participants engaged with the LIFT interventions and reported benefits of taking part. This suggests an important future role for the remote delivery of fatigue self-management.