Increased combined anteversion is associated with larger posterior acetabular rim ossification in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

PURPOSE: (1) To determine the prevalence, magnitude and distribution pattern of acetabular rim ossification in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and (2) to determine the association between acetabular rim ossification and rotational abnormalities of the hip. METHODS: Patients underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS at our institute between January 2021 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of the operated hip and ipsilateral distal femur were available for the measurement of femoral and acetabular anteversion. The presence and size of acetabular rim ossification were evaluated on coronal CT sections for the superior half of the acetabulum on each clockface location. The associations between acetabular rim ossification and radiographic parameters of hip rotational morphology were examined. RESULTS: A total of 214 hips were included. Acetabular rim ossification was found in 167 hips (78%) and the most common locations were 10 and 11 o'clock. Patients presenting with acetabular rim ossification had a mean size of 4.6 ± 1.6 mm. It was the largest at 9 o'clock position (4.9 ± 2.2 mm), with a decreasing trend in size from posterior to anterior. Logistics regression analysis found age was associated with the occurrence of posterior ossification (p = 0.002). Linear regression analysis found age (p = 0.049) and male sex (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the size of ossification. Patients with increased cranial combined anteversion had larger posterior ossification than patients with normal and decreased cranial combined anteversion (4.2 ± 2.9 vs. 3.1 ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.016; 4.2 ± 2.9 vs. 2.5 ± 2.4 mm, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Increased combined anteversion is associated with greater posterior acetabular rim ossification. The presence and size of acetabular rim ossification are positively associated with older age and male sex. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Combined Anteversion Threshold to Avoid Anterior Dislocation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Direct Anterior Approach.

BACKGROUND: Component malposition in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to dislocation, early implant failure, and revision surgery. As the surgical approach might affect the targeted combined anteversion (CA) of THA components, the present study aimed to evaluate the optimal CA threshold to avoid anterior dislocation in primary THA performed through a direct anterior approach (DAA). METHODS: A total of 1,176 THAs in 1,147 consecutive patients (men: 593, women: 554) who had an average age of 63 years (range, 24 to 91) and a mean body mass index of 29 (range, 15 to 48) were identified. Medical records were reviewed for dislocation, whereas postoperative radiographs were assessed to measure the acetabular inclination and CA using a previously validated radiographic method. RESULTS: An anterior dislocation occurred in 19 patients at an average of 40 days postoperatively. The average CA in patients who did and did not have a dislocation was 66 ± 8° and 45 ± 11°, respectively (P < .001). In 5 of 19 of the patients, a THA was performed for secondary osteoarthritis and 17 of 19 had a 28-mm femoral head. A CA ≥ 60° yielded a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 90% for predicting an anterior dislocation in the present cohort. A CA ≥ 60° was associated with a significantly higher risk of anterior dislocation (odds ratio = 75.6; P < .001) compared to patients who had a CA<60 points. CONCLUSION: The optimal CA to avoid anterior dislocations in THA performed through the DAA should be less than 60°. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional study, Level III.

Error of intraoperative measurement of stem anteversion is decreased by measuring in neutral hip position during total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative stem anteversion, which is the angle between the lower leg axis and the trial-stem axis with hip flexion and adduction, is generally evaluated by the surgeon's visual estimation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the conventional approach can be influenced by knee osteoarthritis or uncertain surgeon's observation point. Therefore, we developed a new method for measuring the stem anteversion angle in the neutral hip position using an original rod attached to the trial-stem perpendicular to the long axis and parallel to the stem neck. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of our method in comparison with the conventional method of measuring intraoperative stem anteversion angle. METHODS: We measured the intraoperative stem anteversion angle in consecutive 106 hips of 106 patients who underwent cementless primary THA with a tapered wedge stem. Absolute error in the stem anteversion angle was expressed as the difference between intraoperative (common vs. neutral hip positions) and postoperative computed tomography measurements, i.e., true stem anteversion. Additionally, we investigated the factors affecting these errors. RESULTS: The absolute error of measurement was significantly smaller in the neutral hip position than in the common position (3.0° ± 2.5° vs. 8.0° ± 3.9°; p < 0.0001). The factor associated with the error was advanced knee osteoarthritis in the common position, whereas it was not statistically significant in the neutral hip position. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the error in the intraoperative measurement of stem anteversion is decreased by measuring in the neutral hip position during THA.

A novel method for evaluating combined component anteversion in total hip arthroplasty on cross-table lateral hip radiographs.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate measurement of combined component anteversion (CA) is important in evaluating the radiographic outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a novel radiographic method in estimating CA in THA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiographs and computer tomography of patients who underwent a primary THA were retrospectively reviewed, to measure the radiographic CA (CAr), defined as the angle between a line connecting the center of the femoral head to the most anterior rim of the acetabular cup and a line connecting the center of the femoral head to the base of the femoral head to allow a comparison with the CA measured on the CT (CACT). Subsequently, a computational simulation was performed to evaluate the effect of cup anteversion, inclination, stem anteversion, and leg rotation on the CAr and develop a formula that would correct the CAr according to the acetabular cup inclination based on the best-fit equation. RESULTS: In the retrospective analysis of 154 THA, the average CAr_cor, and CACT were 53 ± 11° and 54 ± 11° (p > 0.05), respectively. A strong correlation was found between CAr and CACT (r = 0.96, p < 0.001), with an average bias of - 0.5° between CAr_cor and CACT. In the computational simulation, the CAr was strongly affected by the cup anteversion, inclination, stem anteversion, and leg rotation. The formula to convert the CAr to CA_cor was: CA-cor = 1.3*Car - (17* In (Cup Inclination) - 31. CONCLUSION: The combined anteversion measurement of THA components on the lateral hip radiograph is accurate and reliable, implying that it could be routinely used postoperatively but also in patients with persistent complaints following a THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional study, Level III.

Which stem in total hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia? A comparative study using a 3D CT-based software for pre-operative surgical planning.

BACKGROUND: Stem choice in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip dysplasia is still controversial. The aims of the study were to evaluate (1) which stem design provided the highest percentage of adequate reconstructions in THA for dysplasia and (2) any correlation between the reconstructions provided by the stems and the native femoral morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 150 CT scans including 200 adult dysplastic hips were randomly selected. Using the 3D CT-based software Hip-Op for surgical planning, the native hip anatomy was studied. Then, a single wedge tapered stem, an anatomical stem and a conical tapered stem were simulated in every hip. An adequate reconstruction of hip biomechanics was obtained when combined anteversion, offset restoration, coronal and sagittal tilt, canal filling and leg lengthening were inside the normal ranges. RESULTS: Conical stems achieved the highest percentage of adequate reconstructions (87%, p < 0.0001). The anatomical stem was the worst performer. Single wedge and anatomical stem acceptability was mainly influenced by the combined anteversion. Stem anteversion was correlated with the femoral anteversion (fair correlation), the calcar femorale (fair) and the mediolateral femoral diameter at isthmus (poor). When the femoral anteversion was ≥ 25°, combined anteversion was very acceptable for the conical stem (99.2%), whereas the rate of acceptable combined anteversion for the single wedge tapered stem was 71.4%, and that for the anatomical stem was 51.6% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Stem choice in developmental hip dysplasia is mainly driven by appropriate combined anteversion, which is dependent on the coronal and axial femoral morphologies. As a rule of thumb, tapered stems are adequate when femoral anteversion is < 25°; conical stems should be adopted for higher anteversions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Measuring stem anteversion after total hip arthroplasty: posterior condylar tangent versus transepicondylar axis.

OBJECTIVE: Stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been measured using two different distal references, the posterior condyle (PC) or the transepicondylar axis (TEA). The reliability, the difference in value between these two techniques, and the possible confounding factors are scarcely known. Aims of this work were to assess (1) the intraclass correlation and the difference between the two measurement techniques and (2) the possible influence of condylar dysmorphisms on the anteversion value discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of post-THA CT scans were selected, excluding hip dysplasia, end-stage knee osteoarthritis, and replaced knees. Using a surgical planning software, stem anteversion was measured using the PC or the TEA reference. The intraclass reliability was assessed. The anteroposterior femoral condyle diameters were measured: the difference and the ratio were measured and correlated with the stem anteversion values. RESULTS: 91 CT scans were included. Inter/intra-observer TEA measurements were more reliable than PC. The intraclass correlation between PC and TEA anteversion measurements was good, 0.954 (CI 95% 0.922-0965). The mean difference between PC and TEA anteversion was 5.27 ± 2.41°. The difference and the ratio between the two anteroposterior condyle diameters did not influence the anteversion difference (respectively, p 0.797 and p 0.901). CONCLUSIONS: TEA and PC demonstrated to achieve a good correlation, not dependent from the condyle morphology. However, the difference between the two measurements (5°) can severely influence the combined anteversion (10-20%): due to clinical applicability and better inter/intra-observer agreement, TEA should be preferred for measuring stem anteversion.

Is Combined Anteversion Equally Affected by Acetabular Cup and Femoral Stem Anteversion?

BACKGROUND: To create a safe zone, an understanding of the combined femoral and acetabular mating during hip motion is required. We investigated the position of the femoral head inside the acetabular liner during simulated hip motion. We hypothesized that cup and stem anteversions do not equally affect hip motion and combined hip anteversion. METHODS: Hip implant motion was simulated in standing, sitting, sit-to-stand, bending forward, squatting, and pivoting positions using the MATLAB software. A line passing through the center of the stem neck and the center of the prosthetic head exits at the polar axis (PA) of the prosthetic head. When the prosthetic head and liner are parallel, the PA faces the center of the liner (PA position = 0, 0). By simulating hip motion in 1-degree increments, the maximum distance of the PA from the liner center and the direction of its movement were measured (polar coordination system). RESULTS: The effect of modifying cup and stem anteversion on the direction and distance of the PA's change inside the acetabular liner was different. Stem anteversion influenced the PA position inside the liner more than cup anteversion during sitting, sit-to-stand, squatting, and bending forward (P = .0001). This effect was evident even when comparing stems with different neck angles (P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Cup anteversion, stem anteversion, and stem neck-shaft angle affected the PA position inside the liner and combined anteversion in different ways. Thus, focusing on cup orientation alone when assessing hip motion during different daily activities is inadequate.

Choice of surgical approach influences the combined anteversion needed for a stable and impingement-free total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Accurate component positioning is the key for successful outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Positioning acetabular and femoral components in a safe zone of 25°-50° on the basis of combined anteversion (CA) has shown to reduce instability and impingement. This safe zone was described for THAs performed through the posterior approach and has not been validated for other surgical approaches. METHODS: Seventy patients who underwent unilateral uncemented THA were included in the study; 35 patients-using posterior approach and the remaining 35-using trans-gluteal approach. All patients included had a stable and impingement-free THA at a mean follow-up of 39.2 ± 9.5 months. CT scan was performed to assess component positioning by calculating CA. The values were compared between the two groups to study possible differences. RESULTS: CA in the trans-gluteal group was significantly lower (32° ± 3.7° vs 38.4° ± 4.6°, P < .001) compared to posterior group. The difference in CA was due to the differences in acetabular anteversion, which was significantly low in the trans-gluteal group than the posterior group (22.1° ± 3.6° vs 27.8° ± 4.2°, P < .001). The mean femoral anteversion was similar in both groups. All trans-gluteal hips fell within the safe zone of 20°-40°, and all posterior hips fell within the safe zone of 25°-50°. CONCLUSION: A safe zone of 25°-50° is valid for THAs performed from the posterior approach but not universally applicable. For trans-gluteal approach, a safe zone of 20°-40° is better to provide a stable and impingement-free THA. CA varies with the surgical approach. THAs performed through the trans-gluteal approach can be stable and impingement-free with lesser CA compared to THAs performed through the posterior approach.

[Intraoperative assessment of pelvic tilt and cup position in total hip arthroplasty: the relevance of navigation and robotics]. / Intraoperative Bestimmung der Beckenkippung und Pfannenposition in der Hüftendoprothetik ­ Relevanz der Navigation und Robotik.

The optimal 3D positioning of the prosthesis components is of great importance for the stability and function of a total hip endoprosthesis. Pelvic tilt has a particular influence on the position of the implant. In order to use intraoperatively the knowledge on pelvic kinematics gained through preoperative imaging procedures and movement analyses, "image-based" and "image-free" robotic and navigation procedures are available. With the "image-based" procedures, a 3D CT scan serves as the surgeon's basis for operative planning. The "image-free" procedures are based on the principles of stereotaxy. In the future, information about static and dynamic pelvic tilt will be conntected with navigation and robotic systems for total hip arthroplasty. Along with intraoperative data a patientindividual optimized implant position can be achieved.

New combined anteversion technique in hybrid THA: cup-first procedure with CT-based navigation.

PURPOSE: Combined anteversion (CA) technique (stem-first procedure) is generally accepted as the optimal technique to attain an appropriate CA value in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, cup anteversion is strongly influenced by the native femoral anteversion. Accordingly, anterior protrusion of the cup in the acetabulum might occur. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the achievement of the optimal CA while avoiding anterior cup protrusion and examine the significance of our new CA technique with cup-first procedure in hybrid THA. METHODS: Seventy-nine hybrid THAs with the cup-first procedure used a CT-based navigation system for cup positioning. In the preoperative planning, cup anteversion was aimed at approximately 20°. However, in actuality, sufficient cup coverage in the original acetabulum based on individual anatomy is given priority over cup placement based on CT-based planning to ensure adequate cup coverage. The target stem anteversion was determined following Widmer's mathematical formula (37.3 = femoral stem anteversion × 0.7 + cup anteversion). Cemented stem was inserted according to the target stem anteversion angle. RESULTS: Regarding the assessment of overall alignment, the calculated Widmer's CA values during surgery and postoperative CT evaluation were 34.1° ± 6.0° (range 20.7°-51.2°) and 35.1° ± 6.7° (range 21.6°-50.7°). There were 72 hips (91.1%) within 25°-50° of CA. Cup protrusion length averaged 2.0 mm ± 2.6 mm (0-8.8 mm) in the axial view and 0.4 mm ± 1.0 mm (0-3.6 mm) in the sagittal view. Cup protrusion length of more than 5 mm was indicated in 10 hips, and no hips observed more than 10 mm. CONCLUSION: Our new CA technique (cup-first procedure) with hybrid THA was able to achieve optimal CA value while avoiding anterior cup protrusion.

Achievement of optimal implant alignment using taper wedge stems with cup-first THA through the MIS antero-lateral approach.

PURPOSE: Combined anteversion (CA) technique (stem-first procedure) has become generally accepted as an ideal means to achieve optimal CA value in THA. However, we hypothesized that CA technique for patients with various native femoral anteversions could pose a risk of anterior or posterior cup protrusion. In the present study, we examined whether it is possible to use the taper wedge stem to change the stem version to achieve optimal CA while avoiding cup protrusions with the cup-first procedure through minimally invasive (MIS) antero-lateral approach. METHODS: Eighty-one patients underwent cup-first THA with a taper wedge stem. The acetabular cup was placed following the preoperative planning of the cup alignment to avoid anterior cup protrusions using CT-based navigation. Following the CA theory, anteversion of the taper wedge stem was changed to the target anteversion from the patient's native femoral anteversion. The native femoral anteversion, the change in version angle of the stem, postoperative CA and the length of anterior cup protrusions were evaluated in postoperative CT measurements. RESULTS: The native femoral anteversion averaged 25.7° ± 8.9° (range 8°-45°). Cases with increased and decreased stem anteversion were observed in 42 hips (51.8%) and 33 hips (40.7%), respectively. The amount of increased and decreased version angles averaged 7.7° ± 4.8° (range 2°-21°) and 7.8° ± 5.1° (range 2°-20°), respectively. Postoperative CA values averaged 36.7° ± 3.4° (range 29.4°-44.2°) and anterior cup protrusion length averaged 2.0 mm ± 2.6 mm (0 ~ 8.8 mm) in axial view and 0.4 mm ± 1.0 mm (0 ~ 3.6 mm) in sagittal view. Anterior cup protrusion of more than 10 mm was not observed in any hips. CONCLUSION: This procedure can be considered as an option to achieve optimal CA anteversion while avoiding anterior cup protrusion in THA.

Total hip arthroplasty using stem-first technique with navigation: the potential of achievement of the optimal combined anteversion being a risk factor for anterior cup protrusion.

PURPOSE: In the combined anteversion (CA) technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a cementless stem, cup anteversion is strongly influenced by the native femoral anteversion. It is hypothesized that in cases with large native femoral anteversion, cup anteversion can be decreased, and anterior cup protrusion from the anterior edge of the acetabulum could occur due to the achievement of optimal CA. In this study, the accuracy of CA in THA with the CA technique using imageless navigation and the relationship between the protrusion of the anterior edge of cup and optimum CA was retrospectively evaluated. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients (104 hips) who underwent primary THA by the CA technique using image-free navigation were enrolled in the study. The femoral stem was placed following the individual femoral anteversion so that the target cup anteversion could be determined following a mathematical formula (37 = femoral stem anteversion × 0.7 + cup anteversion). Results The resulting CA values effectively achieved accurate CA with 39.49 ± 5.03° postoperatively. On the other hand, anterior cup protrusion was measured by computed tomography image. A cup protrusion length of more than 3 mm was indicated for 60 cases (57.7%). All included patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 as protrusion positive and Group 2 as protrusion negative. In Group 1, preoperative femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion were significantly higher, while postoperative cup anteversion was significantly lower. However, the postoperative CA value indicated no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The CA (stem-first) technique with image-free navigated THA could effectively achieve accurate CA. On the other hand, a large number of cases revealed anterior cup protrusion due to the low cup anteversion.

Femoral-Acetabular Mating: The Effect of Femoral and Combined Anteversion on Cross-Linked Polyethylene Wear.

BACKGROUND: Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) has generally low rates of wear and osteolysis at 10 years, but component position may become important with longer follow-up. At 5-13 years, neither acetabular component lateral opening angle nor version were significantly correlated to wear. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of femoral anteversion and combined anteversion on XLPE wear. METHODS: Forty-two well-functioning primary total hip arthroplasties in 36 patients, performed by a single surgeon via a posterior approach, were followed for a minimum of 5 years (mean, 7.1 years; range, 5.0-10.3). All hips had a modular, XLPE liner with a ≥36-mm bearing. Femoral anteversion was measured on the modified Budin view. Wear was measured on radiographs using a validated, computer-assisted, edge-detection-based algorithm. The mean lateral opening angle was 40.4° (range, 22.6°-50.3°). The mean acetabular version was 19.1° (range, 11.3°-27.5°). Neither of these variables was significantly correlated to wear. Effects of femoral anteversion and combined anteversion on XLPE wear were assessed using linear and polynomial regression analysis. RESULTS: Femoral anteversion (mean, 18.4°; range, 6.8°-30.7°) was significantly correlated to linear wear (mean, 0.06 mm/y; range, 0-0.16), showing an inverse parabolic relationship with the least wear occurring at 18.2° (P = .02). Combined anteversion (mean, 37.2°; range, 21.8°-54.3°) showed a similar significant relationship with the least wear at 38.1° (P < .001). Based on regression, combined anteversion between 24.6° and 50.4° resulted in linear wear rates less than 0.1 mm/y. CONCLUSION: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to identify femoral anteversion as an independent factor influencing XLPE wear, with least wear occurring around 18°. At 5-10 years, average linear wear of XLPE is below 0.1 mm/y over a 25°-50° range of combined anteversion, with the least wear around 38°. Femoral-acetabular mating is a product of both components. Femoral component version and combined anteversion had a greater effect on wear than acetabular component lateral opening angle. Additional studies are warranted, but these results indicate that the sensitivity of wear studies is increased with version assessments.

Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: We investigated the various impingement angles (including both bony and prosthetic impingement) and impingement types that can occur after THA, even when the same combined anteversion parameter is used. We also investigated the relationship between impingement angle and acetabular morphology or femoral anteversion. METHODS: We evaluated 83 patients with no hip arthritis. We divided them into six groups according to acetabular CE angle (≤15°, >15-≤25°, and >25°) and femoral anteversion (≤20° and >20°). Using three-dimensional templating software, we changed stem and cup anteversion to satisfy a combined anteversion (CA) of 50° in each hip (stem anteversion + cup anteversion = 50°) and investigated the resulting impingement angles. RESULTS: Even with the same CA, differences in impingement angle occurred: 18.3° ± 7.2° with flexion, 30.2° ± 9.7° with internal rotation at 90° flexion, 20.2° ± 12.5° with extension, and 26.2° ± 7.8° with external rotation. As stem anteversion increased, the impingement type changed from prosthetic impingement to bony impingement in flexion and internal rotation and from bony impingement to prosthetic impingement in extension and external rotation. The flexion angle and internal rotation angle at 90° flexion increased (p < 0.016) as CE angle decreased. There were no significant differences between high and low femoral anteversion. CONCLUSIONS: Combined anteversion theory should be used with care because of large differences in impingement angles. A stem anteversion of 30° and cup anteversion of 20° appear to be ideal for obtaining a larger impingement angle under this condition.

[A therapeutic effect analysis of femur first principle and combined anteversion technique during total hip arthroplasty].

Objective: To investigate the situation of hip dislocation with the application of "femur first" principle and "combined anteversion technique" during total hip arthroplasty. Methods: A retrospective analysis has been done on the clinical data about 104 patients(133 hips)who were diagnosed as hip disease and were treated with total hip arthroplasty by the doctors from the Department of Joint Orthorpaedics of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University from June 2014 to June 2016, and all the prostheses applied in the operation were cementless ones.Among them, 65 patients were males, 39 females and their age was 46.6 years (ranging from 23 to 76 years) .And 29 of them underwent bilateral hip operations and 75 unilateral ones.Seventy-six cases of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head in the terminal stage, 28 cases of hip dysplasia and osteoarthritis.Surgical approach: of all the operations, 103 hips were operated on with hardinge approach, 30 with posterolateral approach.During the operation, first of all, the femoral medullary cavity was broached and then the anteversion of intramedullary broacher was measured.After that, the anteversion of the acetabular cup was calculated as 37° minus the anteversion of the broacher, and the acetabular cup was implanted at that angle.The patients' prosthesis combined anteversion, range of motion of the hip joint, operation time, hemorrhage amount, and complications had been kept record.One, three, and six months respectively after the operation, all the patients received outpatient review, and took anteroposterior and lateral position X-ray examination.Harris hip score had been applied to evaluate their hip function before the operation and six months after the operation. Results: All the patients had been operated on smoothly, with the operation time of(57.6±14.5)minutes(36-115 minutes)and hemorrhage amount of (336.5±50.8)ml(180-620 ml). The operation finding showed that the combined anteversion by employing"femur first"principle and combined anteversion techniqueis was (36.6±6.8)°. Also, range of motion of the patients' hip conforms to the D'Lima criterion and no patients had experienced dislocation and some other serious complications.The follow-up ended at August 2017, which lasted for 12.2 months(6-18 months), and 88 cases(119 hips) were interviewed. The Harris hip score for the affected sides of the hip joints 6 months after the surgery was 94.6(86-100). Compared with the score of 29.8(12-43) before surgery, the t-test had proven its statistical significance(t=12.82, P=0.003). Conclusion: Based upon the "femoral first" principle and "combined anteversion technique" during total hip arthroplasty, these operations has been carried out well enough to meet the patients' needs of performing normal daily activities.

The final implant position of a commonly used collarless straight tapered stem design (Corail®) does not correlate with femoral neck resection height in cement-free total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective computed tomography analysis.

BACKGROUND: In total hip arthroplasty, inadequate femoral component positioning can be associated with instability, impingement and component wear and subsequently with patient dissatisfaction. In this study, we investigated the influence of femoral neck resection height on the final three-dimensional position of a collarless straight tapered stem (Corail®). We asked two questions-(1) is neck resection height correlated with version, tilt, and varus/valgus alignment of the femoral component, and (2) dependent on the resection height of the femoral neck, which area of the stem comes into contact with the femoral cortical bone? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional computed tomography scans of 40 patients who underwent minimally invasive, cementless total hip arthroplasty were analyzed retrospectively. We analyzed the relationship between femoral neck resection height and three-dimensional alignment of the femoral implant, as well as the contact points of the implant with the femoral cortical bone. This investigation was approved by the local Ethics Commission (No.10-121-0263) and is a secondary analysis of a larger project (DRKS00000739, German Clinical Trials Register May-02-2011). RESULTS: Mean femoral neck resection height was 10.4 mm (± 4.8) (range 0-20.1 mm). Mean stem version was 8.7° (± 7.4) (range - 2° to 27.9°). Most patients had a varus alignment of the implant. The mean varus/valgus alignment was 1.5° (± 1.8). All 40 patients (100%) had anterior tilt of the implant with a mean tilt of 2.2° (± 1.6). Femoral neck resection height did not correlate with stem version, varus/valgus alignment, or tilt. Independent from femoral neck resection height, in most patients the implant had contact with the ventral and ventromedial cortical bone in the upper third (77.5%) and the middle third (52.5%). In the lower third, the majority of the implants had contact with the lateral and dorsolateral cortical bone (92.5%). CONCLUSION: Femoral neck resection height ranging between 0 and 20.1 mm does not correlate with the final position of a collarless straight tapered stem design (Corail®). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Femur first surgical technique: a smart non-computer-based procedure to achieve the combined anteversion in primary total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The relevance of prosthetic component orientation to prevent dislocation and impingement following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been widely accepted. We investigated the use of a non-computer-based surgery to address the reciprocal orientation of the acetabular and femoral components. METHODS: In the femur first technique, the cup is positioned relative to the stem. When the definitive antetorsion of femoral component is fixed, the cup is positioned in a compliant anteversion to the stem. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed before and 3 months after THA. Radiographic assessment was performed in standing position with the EOS 2D/3D radiography system. 3D images were used to preoperative anterior pelvic plane (APP) angle, postoperative acetabular inclination (AI) and anteversion (AA), and postoperative stem antetorsion. Clinical assessment was performed with Harris Hip Score (HHS). RESULTS: Forty patients (40 hips) underwent primary THA with an average age of 61 years (range, 36-84). Average HHS increased from 43 ± 5 (range, 37-52) preoperatively to 97 ± 6 (range, 86-100) at the last follow-up (P < 0.0001). Average combined anteversion value of cup with liner and stem was 38° ± 9° (range, 12°-55°). Average AI value of cup with liner was 39° ± 6° (range, 30°-55°) in the group with standard stem and 45° ± 7° (range, 39°-58°) in the group with varized stem (P = 0.007). Relationship analysis showed no correlation between the combined anteversion values of the cup with liner and stem with APP angle values (r = 0.26, P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Femur first technique allows the surgeon to achieve a combined anteversion ranging from 25° to 50° with a cup inclination ranging from 30° to 50°. The cup is positioned according to the functional plane of the patient regardless the preoperative pelvic tilt.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Navigation With the Concept of Combined Anteversion.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the implant positions and clinical results of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using an imageless navigation with the concept of combined anteversion. METHODS: A total of 40 cementless revision THAs (24 men and 16 women) using an imageless navigation with the concept of combined anteversion were retrospectively evaluated. The concept of combined anteversion was applied in cup positioning based on Widmer's equation (cup anteversion + 0.7 × stem anteversion). The mean follow-up period was 80.7 months. Postoperatively, the inclination of the cup was evaluated on standard anteroposterior view of the radiograph, and the anteversion of the cup and femoral stem was evaluated using computed tomography scan. A cup inclination of 40° ± 10° and combined anteversion of the cup and femoral stem of 37° ± 10° based on Widmer's equation were regarded as the "safe zone." RESULTS: The average anteversion of the revised femoral stems was 15.3° ± 2.9° (range, 9.5°-21.5°), whereas that of the remained femoral stems was 17.4° ± 9.7° (range, 4.2°-29.8°). The inclination, anteversion of the cup, and combined anteversion after revision THA were 42.3° ± 3.1° (range, 32.1°-48.2°), 25.0° ± 2.9° (range, 16.9°-29.5°), and 36.1° ± 3.4° (range, 27.2°-42.9°), respectively. Therefore, the position of the implants, relative to the safe zone, showed no outliers after the revision surgery. Neither dislocation nor osteolysis was observed after the surgery. CONCLUSION: Favorable results of this study indicate that imageless navigation helps the surgeon in placing the components of revision THA in the safe zone. This study also shows that when this safe zone is consistently obtained, then no postoperative dislocations were observed in these patients over the 6-year follow-up period.

Preoperative Planning and Operative Techniques of the Shorter Tapered Stem Compared to the Metaphyseal Fit Stem in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In order to prevent postoperative dislocation due to prosthetic impingement as a result of total hip arthroplasty (THA), the combined anteversion (CA) theory, which combines the anteversion of the femoral stem and the acetabular socket, has been revised in recent years. Particularly, it is necessary to keep CA within the target zone. METHODS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether postoperative CA can be kept within the target zone while using the operative technique which prepares the socket first in cementless THA, by estimating the anteversion of the metaphyseal fit stem or the shorter, tapered wedge stem using preoperative 3-dimensional computerized planning, and by adjusting the anteversion of the socket using a navigation system that considers CA. One hundred fourteen patients (118 hips) were recruited for the study. RESULTS: Postoperative CA in THA using the metaphyseal fit stem was kept within the target zone for 56 of the 60 hips (93.3%). Using the shorter, tapered wedge stem, 49 of the 58 hips (84.4%) were within the target zone. No postoperative dislocations were observed in any hips. CONCLUSION: We found that the metaphyseal fit stem worked better than the shorter, tapered wedge stem in terms of meeting the planned CA. The shorter, tapered wedge stems were flexible in rotation according to the anatomical configuration of the proximal femur. Therefore, the stem could be placed second with the metaphyseal fit stem, but we recommend placing the stem first with the shorter, tapered wedge stem.

Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study.

BACKROUND: Improper femoral and acetabular component positioning can be associated with instability, impingement, component wear and finally patient dissatisfaction in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The concept of "femur first"/"combined anteversion", incorporates various aspects of performing a functional optimization of the prosthetic stem and cup position of the stem relative to the cup intraoperatively. In the present study we asked two questions: (1) Do native femoral anteversion and anteversion of the implant correlate? (2) Do anteversion of the final broach and implant anteversion correlate? METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a prospective controlled trial, a subgroup of 55 patients, who underwent computer-assisted, cementless THA with a straight, tapered stem through an anterolateral, minimally invasive (MIS) approach in a lateral decubitus position were examined retrospectivly. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to verify a "best-fit" position of the final broach. An image-free navigation system was used for measurement of the native femoral version, version of the final broach and the final implant. Femoral neck resection height was measured in postoperative CT-scans. This investigation was approved by the local Ethics Commission (No.10-121-0263) and is a secondary analysis of a larger project (DRKS00000739, German Clinical Trials Register May-02-2011). RESULTS: The mean difference between native femoral version and final implant was 1.9° (+/- 9.5), with a range from -20.7° to 21.5° and a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.39 (p < 0.003). In contrast, we observed a mean difference between final broach and implant version of -1.9° (+/- 3.5), with a range from -12.7° to 8.7° and a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.89 (p < 0.001). In 83.6 % (46/55) final stem version was outside the normal range as defined by Tönnis (15-20°). The mean femoral neck resection height was 7.3 mm (+/- 5.6). There was no correlation between resection height and version of the implant (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.14). CONCLUSION: Native femoral version significantly differs from the final anteversion of a cementless, straight, tapered stem and therefore is not a reliable reference in cementless THA. Measuring anteversion of the final "fit and fill" broach is a feasible assistance in order to predict final stem anteversion intraoperatively. There is no correlation between femoral neck resection height and version of the implant.