RESUMEN
To our knowledge, no prior study has analysed a possible association between acetazolamide and pulmonary oedema. The aim of this study was to use data from the EudraVigilance to detect a safety signal for acetazolamide-induced pulmonary oedema. We performed a disproportionality analysis (case-noncase method), calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs) up to 22 February 2024. Among 11 684 208 spontaneous cases of adverse reactions registered in EudraVigilance, 38 275 were pulmonary oedemas. Acetazolamide was involved in 31 cases. In more than half of those cases, the patients received a single dose of acetazolamide after undergoing cataract surgery: latency was 10-90 min. Remarkably, there were five cases of positive rechallenge and six cases resulted in death. The ROR for acetazolamide was 3.63 (95% CI 2.55-5.17). Disproportionality was also observed in VigiBase®: ROR 4.44 (95% CI 3.34-5.90). Our study confirms a signal that suggests a risk of serious pulmonary oedema associated with acetazolamide.
Asunto(s)
Acetazolamida , Bases de Datos Factuales , Edema Pulmonar , Humanos , Acetazolamida/efectos adversos , Edema Pulmonar/inducido químicamente , Edema Pulmonar/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Inhibidores de Anhidrasa Carbónica/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Anhidrasa Carbónica/administración & dosificación , Farmacovigilancia , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
This study aimed to investigate the reporting rates of arthritis and arthralgia following the administration of four vaccines against SARS-CoV-2: Pfizer-BioNTech (Tozinameran), Moderna (CX-024414), AstraZeneca (Chadox1 NCOV-19), and Janssen (AD26.COV2.S) in 2021. We used data from the EudraVigilance database, specifically analyzing spontaneous reports of suspected adverse reactions (ADRs) from the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) region. Age-group-specific reporting rates were calculated by dividing the number of arthralgia and arthritis reports per 1,000,000 vaccine doses administered per age group. Reporting rates were compared using a rate ratio among the four vaccines, using the AstraZeneca vaccine as a comparator. The AstraZeneca vaccine was associated with the highest rate of arthralgia across all age groups. Arthritis reporting rates were significantly lower, with the AstraZeneca vaccine having the highest rates in most age groups, except the 60-69 and 80+ groups, where the Janssen and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines demonstrated higher reporting rates, respectively. The distribution of arthritis rates did not follow the arthralgia pattern, being higher in the 50-79 age group. This study is the first spontaneous reporting system analysis of arthritis reporting rates post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at a European level, revealing a higher reporting of suspected musculoskeletal adverse reactions after AstraZeneca vaccination. The findings underscore the need to consider commonly reported events like arthralgia in risk-benefit assessments prior to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Given the high prevalence of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and vaccine hesitancy in this population, our results could influence vaccine choice and acceptance.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia , Artritis , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Ad26COVS1 , Artralgia/inducido químicamente , Artralgia/epidemiología , Artritis/inducido químicamente , Artritis/epidemiología , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Farmacovigilancia , Vacunación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Cannabidiol (CBD) is a multitarget agent possessing anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Unlicensed CBD gained public favor for the care of general health and well-being as well as to get comfort from inflammatory complaints, pain, anxiety, mood, and sleep disorders. Safety profile of unlicensed CBD has been not sufficiently described. For this reason, suspected adverse reactions (SARs) to CBD unlicensed products were analyzed. Serious SARs to unlicensed CBD products in EudraVigilance, a system purchased by the European Medicines Agency, were analyzed for age, sex of the patient, adverse reactions, indication for use, and concomitant drugs. Serious SARs were 18.9% of all adverse events to unlicensed CBD; they were more frequent in men and adult people and, to a less extent, in children (3-11 years). About sex, in EudraVigilance serious Individual Cases Safety Reports of SARs to CBD in men are in the largest number (58.8%) with respect to women. Unlicensed CBD was used in the 38.8% of cases for treatment of epilepsy; more frequent adverse effects were: mental disorders, hepatic disorders, and aggravation of pre-existing epilepsy. Drugs or substances more frequently associated with SARs were the antiepileptics clobazam and valproic acid, followed by cannabis. Results suggest that precautions and appropriate surveillance of adverse effects should be taken when unlicensed CBD is used.
Asunto(s)
Cannabidiol , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Epilepsia , Masculino , Niño , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Cannabidiol/efectos adversos , Farmacovigilancia , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Nivolumab is used to treat several different types of cancers. Although it is generally considered to be effective and well-tolerated, it has been associated with adverse effects requiring discontinuation of treatment, like many other drugs used for cancer. A 70-year-old male was switched from sunitinib to nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma. The patient developed persistent hypothyroidism, onycholysis, and pneumonitis at nivolumab cycle 6, 10, and 11, respectively. Using the Naranjo causality method, the likelihood of causality was deemed "probable" for pneumonitis and hypothyroidism and "possible" for onycholysis. Nivolumab was eventually discontinued due to disease progression, rather than safety concerns. Eudravigilance, the European pharmacovigilance database, was searched for all nivolumab-related individual case safety reports from Malta, up to September 4, 2023. Six reports were identified in Malta, although the 3 events identified in this case report were not reported, suggesting under-reporting in Malta. This case report identified an uncommon nivolumab adverse drug reaction (ADR), onycholysis and showed how, despite the occurrence of 3 ADRs, it was its lack of efficacy rather than its safety which led to its discontinuation in this particular patient.
RESUMEN
Drugs are the imperial part of modern society, but along with their therapeutic effects, drugs can also cause adverse effects, which can be mild to morbid. Pharmacovigilance is the process of collection, detection, assessment, monitoring and prevention of adverse drug events in both clinical trials as well as in the post-marketing phase. The recent trends in increasing unknown adverse events, known as signals, have raised the need to develop an ideal system for monitoring and detecting the potential signals timely. The process of signal management comprises of techniques to identify individual case safety reports systematically. Automated signal detection is highly based upon the data mining of the spontaneous reporting system such as reports from health care professional, observational studies, medical literature or from social media. If a signal is not managed properly, it can become an identical risk associated with the drug which can be hazardous for the patient safety and may have fatal outcomes which may impact health care system adversely. Once a signal is detected quantitatively, it can be further processed by the signal management team for the qualitative analysis and further evaluations. The main components of automated signal detection are data extraction, data acquisition, data selection, and data analysis and data evaluation. This system must be developed in the correct format and context, which eventually emphasizes the quality of data collected and leads to the optimal decision-making based upon the scientific evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Minería de Datos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procesamiento Automatizado de Datos , Farmacovigilancia , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The first biologic authorized for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) up to this date, belimumab, is currently not recommended for use during pregnancy due to lack of data. Provided that the health of the child begins with the health of the mother, pregnant patients face the dilemma of cessation or continuation of belimumab. If belimumab is stopped, there will be a risk of SLE flare and its consequences for the mother and the foetus. Continuation is also not optimal because of the lack of knowledge on safety for use during pregnancy. AIM: To compare the reported foetal outcomes in SLE patients who stopped scheduled belimumab within the first trimester (group A) and those who continued scheduled belimumab during the first trimester or thereafter (group B). MATERIAL AND METHOD: All belimumab-exposed pregnancy-related reports were extracted from the EudraVigilance (EV) database until March 11th, 2021. After case review, repeated cases, uninformative reports, non-medical elective abortions and foetal chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. Included pregnancies were divided into two groups (group A and B, as described above). Foetal outcomes were divided into live birth or foetal death (due to miscarriage or stillbirth) and were compared between both groups. Furthermore, neonatal outcomes, such as reporting rates of preterm birth, low birth weight and major congenital malformations were compared. RESULTS: No statistical difference in foetal death was observed between group A and B (reported numbers (%) = 32 (46.4) and 11 (52.4), respectively). Odds ratio (OR, [95% Confidence Intervals (CIs)]) of foetal death in group B compared to group A was 1.27 [0.48, 3.32]. Reporting rates of preterm birth and low birth weight were higher - though not statistically different - in group A. CONCLUSION: The positive results of our study are supportive for the continuation of belimumab during pregnancy. Since the analysis is based on spontaneous reports/retrospective data, additional studies are needed to confirm the results.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Nacimiento Prematuro , Embarazo , Femenino , Niño , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Muerte Fetal , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Fentanyl, a highly potent synthetic opioid used in cancer and non-cancer pain, is approved for various routes of administration. In Europe, fentanyl consumption increased substantially in the last decades but information on abuse, dependence and withdrawal associated with fentanyl is scarce, especially with respect to its different formulations. METHODS: We analysed case characteristics of spontaneous reports of suspected fentanyl-associated abuse, dependence or withdrawal from European countries recorded in the EudraVigilance database up to 2018 with respect to the (designated) routes of administration and potential indications. RESULTS: A total of 985 reports were included (mainly from France and Germany) with 43% of cases referring to transdermal fentanyl. Median age was 45 years (48.8% female) and 21.6% had musculoskeletal disorders. Only 12.6% of those using transdermal fentanyl had a cancer diagnosis compared to 40.2% and 26.8% of those using intranasal and oral transmucosal fentanyl, respectively. Depression was common (10.7%) and highest in cases with musculoskeletal disorders (24.9%) as was the use of benzodiazepines. Overall, 39.5% of reports resulted in a prolonged hospital stay and for 23.2% a fatal outcome was recorded. The respective proportions were especially high in cases with musculoskeletal disorders (56.3% with prolonged hospitalisation) and in those using transdermal fentanyl (35.2% fatalities). CONCLUSIONS: In suspected cases of abuse, dependence or withdrawal, fentanyl was mainly used for non-cancer pain indications and most often as transdermal formulations. Depression and prolonged hospitalisations were common, especially in patients with musculoskeletal disorders, indicating a vulnerable patient group and complex treatment situations.
Asunto(s)
Fentanilo , Neoplasias , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides , Administración Cutánea , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which have anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, are commonly used in the treatment of various, particularly frequent, as well as chronic, conditions in older patients. Due to common polypragmasia in these patients and a high risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drug interactions, pain management poses a therapeutic challenge. This study describes the importance of ADR reports in the identification of polypharmacy and the ensuing interactions. Materials and Methods: Both healthcare professionals (HPs) and non-healthcare professionals (non-HPs) reports collected in the EudraVigilance database of NSAIDs, including most commonly co-reported medications and reported reactions, were analysed and differences between HPs and non-HPs reports were identified. Results: In the analysed period and group, non-HPs reported more reactions but indicated fewer drugs as suspect or concomitant. The outcomes of our analysis indicate more HP engagement and more detailed reports of serious ADRs when compared to non-serious individual case safety reports (ICSRs) by non-HPs, which appeared more detailed. Such reactions as kidney failure and increased risk of bleeding are known adverse reactions to NSAIDs and common symptoms of their interactions, which were described in the available literature. They were much more frequently reported by HPs than by non-HPs. Non-HPs more frequently reported reactions that may have been considered less significant by HPs. Conclusions: The differences between healthcare professionals' (HPs) and non-healthcare professionals' (non-HPs) reports may result from the fact that the reports from patients and their caregivers require a professional medical diagnosis based on symptoms described by the patient or additional diagnostic tests. This means that when appropriately classified, medically verified, and statistically analysed, the data may provide new evidence for the risks of medication use or drug interactions.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Fuentes de Información , Humanos , Anciano , Polifarmacia , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
AIMS: To evaluate the number and nature of reported congenital malformations (CMs) after intrauterine exposure to non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor biologics (non-TNFi biologics) compared to certolizumab pegol (CZP). METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was conducted in the EudraVigilance (EV) database. A safe biologic (CZP) was considered as the reference group. Odds ratios (ORs) for CMs were calculated for each non-TNFi biologic (including abatacept, anakinra, belimumab, ixekizumab, rituximab, secukinumab, tocilizumab, ustekinumab and vedolizumab), versus CZP (quantitative assessment). Then, CM patterns were reviewed in consultation with a clinical geneticist (qualitative assessment). RESULTS: ORs were not statistically significant except for belimumab and vedolizumab (similar in magnitude). Except for vedolizumab, no specific CM patterns were observed for the included non-TNFi biologics. Three cases of corpus callosum agenesis (CCA) were identified for vedolizumab (versus none in CZP and other investigated non-TNFi biologics). Two of the CCA cases were associated with other neurological CMs (one cerebral ventriculomegaly with microcephaly and one polymicrogyria). This may indicate that these CCAs are related to undiagnosed genetic alterations or are associated with the underlying maternal disease, although a definite relationship with vedolizumab exposure cannot be ruled out. CONCLUSION: No special safety signal was identified regarding the occurrence of CMs after exposure to abatacept (n = 64), anakinra (n = 20), belimumab (n = 93), ixekizumab (n = 29), rituximab (n = 57), secukinumab (n = 128), tocilizumab (n = 124) and ustekinumab (n = 215). Regarding observed CCAs in the vedolizumab group (n = 113), no firm conclusions can be made based on available information.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Productos Biológicos , Humanos , Abatacept , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Certolizumab Pegol/efectos adversos , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/uso terapéutico , Necrosis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Ustekinumab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues has been linked to the risk of thyroid cancer. Spontaneous reports can provide information about rare adverse events occurring after the time of marketing. Our objective was to detect, from the European pharmacovigilance database (EudraVigilance), a signal of thyroid cancer during GLP-1 analogues treatment in patients with diabetes. METHODS: Herein, we analysed all reports of thyroid cancer reported with GLP-1 analogues in EudraVigilance database from their first marketing authorization till 30 January 2020. A case/non-case method was used to assess the association between thyroid cancer and GLP-1 analogues, calculating proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) as a measure of disproportionality. The cases were identified with Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 22.1. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There were 11 243 cases of thyroid cancer and related preferred terms (PTs) in the 6 665 794 reports recorded in EudraVigilance during the study period. GLP-1 analogues were involved in 236 cases. Exenatide, liraglutide and dulaglutide met the criteria to generate a safety signal, suggesting that thyroid cancer is reported relatively more frequently in association with these drugs than with other medicinal products. The association was strongest for liraglutide followed by exenatide with PRR of 27.5 (95% CI, 22.7-33.3) and 22.5 (95% CI, 17.9-28.3), respectively. Disproportionality was also observed for GLP-1 analogues and individual identified preferred term, that is thyroid cancer (N = 111), medullary thyroid cancer (N = 64) and thyroid neoplasm (N = 46) with PRR of 14.4 (95% CI, 11.8-17.4), 221.5 (95% CI, 155.7-315.1) and 35.5 (95% CI, 25.9-48.5), respectively. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed disproportionality for thyroid cancer, medullary thyroid cancer and thyroid neoplasm in patients treated with GLP-1 analogues. We have found evidence from spontaneous reports that GLP-1 analogues are associated with thyroid cancer in patients with diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacovigilancia , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/etiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is a cornerstone in pharmacovigilance. However, information about the underlying consumption of drugs is rarely used when analysing spontaneous reports. The purpose of this study was to combine ADR reports with drug consumption data to demonstrate the additional information this gives in various scenarios, comparing different drugs, gender-stratified sub-populations and changes in reporting over time. METHODS: We combined all Norwegian ADR reports in 2004-2013 from the EudraVigilance database (n = 14.028) with dispensing data from the Norwegian Prescription Database (more than 800 million dispensed prescriptions during 2004-2013). This was done in order to calculate drug-specific consumption-adjusted adverse drug reaction reporting rates (CADRRs) by dividing the number of reports for each drug with the number of users of the drug during the same time period. RESULTS: Among the ten drugs with the highest number of ADR reports and the ten drugs with the highest CADRR, only four drugs were in both categories. This indicates that drugs with a high number of reports often also have a high number of users and that CADRR captures drugs with potentially relevant safety issues but a smaller number of users. Comparing reported ADRs in females and males using methylphenidate, we found that the two groups report different ADRs. Finally, we showed that changes in ADR reporting for simvastatin and atorvastatin during 2004-2013 were due to changes in consumption and that atorvastatin had a higher CADRR but fewer reports than simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: CADRR provides additional information compared with number of reports alone in studies using spontaneous reports. It is important for researchers to adjust for consumption whenever possible in pharmacovigilance studies.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Farmacovigilancia , Atorvastatina/efectos adversos , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Metilfenidato/efectos adversos , Noruega/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Simvastatina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The European Medicines Agency developed an algorithm to detect unexpected increases in frequency of reports, to enhance the ability to detect adverse events that manifest as increases in frequency, in particular quality defects, medication errors, and cases of abuse or misuse. METHODS: An algorithm based on a negative binomial time-series regression model run on 6 sequential observations prior to the monitored period was developed to forecast monthly counts of reports. A heuristic model to capture increases in counts when the previous 4 observations were null supplemented the regression. Count data were determined at drug-event combination. Sensitivity analyses were run to determine the effect of different methods of pooling or stratifying count data. Positive retrospective detections and positive predictive values (PPVs) were determined. RESULTS: The algorithm detected 8 of the 13 historical concerns, including all concerns of quality defects. The highest PPV (1.29%) resulted from increasing the lower count threshold from 3 to 5 and including literature reports in the counts. Both the regression model and the heuristic model components to the algorithm contributed to the detection of concerns. Sensitivity analysis indicates that stratification by commercial product reduces the PPV but suggests that pooling counts of related events may improve it. CONCLUSION: The results are encouraging and suggest that the algorithm could be useful for the detection of concerns that manifest as changes in frequency of reporting; however, further testing, including in prospective use, is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/organización & administración , Algoritmos , Farmacovigilancia , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución Binomial , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Abuso de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Unión Europea/organización & administración , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Estadísticos , Distribución de Poisson , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
We investigated a pulmonary adverse drug reaction possibly induced by fluoxetine, the Interstitial Lung Disease, by performing a systematic review of published case reports on this subject, a review of the World Health Organization VigiAccess database, of the European EudraVigilance database and of a national Pharmacovigilance database (Italian Pharmacovigilance Network). The research found a total of seven cases linking fluoxetine to Interstitial Lung Disease in the literature. 36 cases of interstitial lung disease related to fluoxetine were retrieved from the VigiAccess database (updated to July 2016), and 36 reports were found in EudraVigilance database (updated to June 2016). In the Italian Pharmacovigilance database (updated to August 2016), we found only one case of Interstitial Lung Disease, codified as "pulmonary disease". Our investigation shows that fluoxetine might be considered as a possible cause of Interstitial Lung Disease. In particular, although here we do not discuss the assessment of benefits and harms of fluoxetine, since this antidepressant is widely used, our review suggests that fluoxetine-induced Interstitial Lung Disease should be considered in patients with dyspnea, associated or not with dry cough, who are treated with this drug. An early withdrawn of fluoxetine could be useful to obtain a complete remission of this adverse drug reaction and special attention should be particularly devoted to long-term therapy, and to female and elderly patients. Although the spontaneous reporting system is affected by important limitations, drug post- marketing surveillance represents an important tool to evaluate the real world effectiveness and safety of drugs.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/inducido químicamente , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Animales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/epidemiología , FarmacovigilanciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Masking is a statistical issue by which signals are hidden by the presence of other medicines in the database. In the absence algorithm, the impact of the masking effect has not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: Our study is aimed at assessing the extent and the impact of the masking effect on two large spontaneous reporting databases. STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional study using a set of terms of importance for public health in two spontaneous reporting databases. SETTING: The analyses were performed on EudraVigilance (EV) and the Pfizer spontaneous reporting database (PfDB). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Using the masking ratio, we have identified and removed the products inducing the highest masking effect. RESULTS: Studying a total of almost 50 000 drug-event combinations masking had an impact on approximately 60% of drug-event combinations were masked by another product with a masking ratio >1 in EV and 84% in PfDB. The prevalence of important masking was quite rare (0.003% of the DECs) and mainly affected events rarely reported in EV. The products involved in the highest masking effects are products known to induce the reaction. The removal of the masking effect of the highest masking product has revealed 974 signals of disproportionate reporting in EV including true signals. The study shows that the original ranking provided by the quantitative methods included in our study is marginally affected by the removal of the masking product. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that significant masking is rare in large spontaneous databases and mostly affects events rarely reported in EV.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Farmacoepidemiología/métodos , Algoritmos , Estudios Transversales , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Humanos , Farmacovigilancia , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evolocumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody, directed against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK9), prescribed in hypercholesterolemic patients. The safety profile of this drug is currently defined by the data of pre-authorization clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to update knowledge of the safety of evolocumab through an analysis of post-marketing real-world data on suspected adverse reactions (SARs), reported by the EudraVigilance database system. METHODS: The public version of the EudraVigilance database has been used, and only serious SARs signals were included. RESULTS: Musculoskeletal system disorders, flu-like symptoms, injection-site reactions, skin reactions, and metabolism and nutrition disorders are observed in the post-marketing surveillance, as well as being found in the pre-authorization studies. Not previously signaled in the pre-marketing studies, diarrhea was reported. Furthermore, signals related to cardiac adverse reactions, more frequently at the expense of adults in comparison to elders, were found. CONCLUSIONS: The post-marketing safety profile of evolocumab emerging from an analysis of the EudraVigilance data system indicates it is sufficiently safe but suggests the necessity for caution when it is prescribed to hyperlipidemic patients affected by heart diseases.
RESUMEN
AIMS: We aimed to analyse serious cardiac adverse drug reactions to COVID-19 vaccines from the Europe-wide EudraVigilance database. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, the EudraVigilance database was searched to identify suspected serious cardiac postvaccination adverse drug reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. This data was coupled with the number of total vaccine doses administered in the European Economic Area for Comirnaty (Pfizer BioNTech), Spikevax (Moderna), Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), Jcovden (Janssen), Nuvaxovid (Novavax), products, available from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control "Vaccine Tracker" database. The analysis included 772,228,309 administered doses of eligible vaccines from the "Vaccine Tracker" database and 86,051 eligible records of cardiac adverse drug reactions from the EudraVigilance database.The frequency of most of the investigated adverse drug reactions was very rare (<1/10,000 i.e. <100/1,000,000 doses). The lowest risk of any serious cardiac adverse drug reactions was noticed for vaccination with Comirnaty (135.5 per million doses), while Spikevax, Jcovden, Vaxzevria and Nuvaxovid were characterised by higher risk (respectively, 140.9, 194.8, 313.6 and 1065.2 per million doses). The most common complications of vaccinations included syncope, arrhythmia, tachycardia, palpitations, angina pectoris, hypertension, myocarditis, thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of serious cardiac adverse drug reactions to COVID-19 vaccines is low and the benefit of active immunisation against that disease seems to outweigh the potential risk of serious postvaccination cardiac adverse drug reactions.
RESUMEN
In recent years, regulatory agencies have raised concerns about the presence of potentially carcinogenic substances in certain formulations of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs). Specifically, nitrosamines and azido compounds have been identified in some ARB products. Nitrosamines are known to have carcinogenic properties and are associated with an increased risk of neoplasms. Spontaneous safety reports from the EudraVigilance Data Analysis System (EVDAS) database were analyzed to investigate cases of neoplasms associated with ARBs. A disproportionality analysis was conducted, calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a case/non-case approach for each ARB drug. The EVDAS database contained 68,522 safety reports related to ARBs (including Azilsartan, Candesartan, Irbesartan, Olmesartan, Losartan, Valsartan, and Telmisartan), among which 3,396 (5%) cases were associated with neoplasms. The majority of these cases were reported in Germany (11.9%), followed by France (9.7%). Approximately 70% of the reports were submitted by healthcare professionals such as physicians and nurses. Among the ARBs, valsartan had the highest ROR for neoplasm (ROR 1.949, 95% CI 1.857-2.046). This association remained significant when comparing ARBs with other classes of antihypertensive drugs, including ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics. Our study identifies a possible signal of an association between ARBs, particularly valsartan, and the risk of neoplasms. However, further observational and analytical studies are necessary to confirm these findings and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Valsartán , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Alemania/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Introduction: In 2021 ofatumumab, a recombinant human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) already authorized for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, received the marketing approval for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Differently from ocrelizumab, that is administered intravenously, ofatumumab if the first anti-CD20 mAb to be administered subcutaneously without a premedication. Methods and objectives: In this study we aimed to describe and compare the main characteristics of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) describing the occurrence of Injective Related Reactions (IRRs) following the treatment with ocrelizumab and ofatumumab reported in the Eudravigilance (EV) database during years 2021-2023. Results: A total of 860 ICSRs with either ofatumumab and ocrelizumab as suspected drug were retrieved from Eudravigilance, of which 51% associated with ofatumumab and 49% with ocrelizumab. The majority of patients who experienced IRRs following ocrelizumab belonged to the age group of 18-64 years (73%), while the age-group was mostly not specified (55%) in ICSRs reporting ofatumumab as suspected. The distribution of gender was almost similar in the two groups, with the majority of ICSRs related to female patients. "Pyrexia" was the Preferred Term (PT) most reported for ofatumumab, while "Infusion related reaction" were more frequently reported with ocrelizumab. Premedication drugs were reported in 148 ICSRs. Out of 89 ICSRs for which the Time to Event (TTE) was calculated, 74 reported IRRs that occurred the same day of the drug administration. Discussion: Based on the results of this study, although a risk of ofatumumab-induced IRRs cannot be excluded, it should be considered as manageable considering that the drug seems to be mostly associated with the occurrence of fever. Thus, it is important to continue to closely monitor the use of these in clinical practice to improve the knowledge on their long-term safety.
RESUMEN
Some glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), first used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), have been approved for the treatment of obesity in patients with or without T2DM (liraglutide-LIR, semaglutide-SEM, and tirzepatide-TIR). Social media had an important influence on the off-label use of GLP-1 RAs for obesity, especially for SEM. We analyzed the Google queries related to SEM to assess people's interest in this drug. We also investigated the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by searching the EudraVigilance database (EV) for Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) that reported SEM as the suspected drug and performed a descriptive and a disproportionality analysis. The data obtained for SEM were compared to other GLP-1 RAs. SEM had the highest proportions of searches on Google associated with the term "weight loss" and presented the lowest number of severe ADRs, but it also had the highest number of ICSRs reported in EV. Even though no unexpected safety issues have been reported for it until now, SEM has a hi3gh tendency for overdose reports. The most frequent off-label use was reported for SEM and TIR. In order to lower the risks of ADRs, the off-label use should be reduced and carefully monitored.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used in immunotherapy have revolutionized cancer management. However, ICI therapy can come with serious neurologic risks. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study is to analyze the occurrence of neurologic events with ICIs. METHODS: We referred to EudraVigilance (EV) and VigiAccess to evaluate the frequency of individual case safety reports (ICSRs), including neurologic events with ICIs. Data was gathered for a period from the date of ICI's marketing authorization till 30 January 2023. The computational assessment was conducted with the help of reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Overall, 8181 ICSRs in EV and 15905 ICSRs from VigiAccess were retrieved for neurologic events, with at least one ICI as the suspected drug. The majority of the ICSRs were reported for nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab, whereas frequently reported events were neuropathy peripheral, myasthenia gravis, seizure, Guillain-Barre syndrome, paraesthesia, syncope, encephalopathy, somnolence. Under EV, 92% of ICSRs were reported as serious, 10% included fatal outcomes, and nearly 61% cited patient recovery. Atezolizumab (ROR 1.64, 95% CI 1.75- 1.52), cemiplimab (ROR 1.61, 95% CI 1.98-1.3), and nivolumab (ROR 1.38, 95% CI 1.44-1.31) had a considerable increase in the frequency of ICSR reporting. Cerebrovascular accident, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, tremor, and somnolence were identified as potential signals. CONCLUSION: ICIs were significantly associated with neurologic risks, which cannot be generalized. A considerable increase in ICSR reporting frequency was observed with atezolizumab, cemiplimab, and nivolumab, while avelumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, and cemiplimab were linked with four potential signals. These findings suggest the consideration of a revision of the neurologic safety profile of ICIs. Furthermore, the necessity for additional ad-hoc research is emphasized.