[The effect of hypothyroidism on cardiovascular events and type 2 diabetes mellitus developing in rheumatoid arthritis].

AIM: To compare the frequency of cardiovascular events (CVE), to assess the risk of cardiovascular death using the mSCORE and the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using the FINDRISC in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with and without hypothyroidism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 149 patients (125 women, 24 men) with RA (median age - 57 [52; 61] years). In all patients, traditional factors of cardiovascular risk and glucose metabolism disorders (age, smoking status, total blood cholesterol, blood pressure, overweight, abdominal obesity - AO, heredity burdened by diabetes, insufficient physical activity, the lack of the necessary amount of berries, fruits and vegetables in the daily diet, history of hyperglycemia episodes), the 10-year risk of death from cardiovascular causes according to the mSCORE and the risk of developing type 2 DM according to the FINDRISС were assessed, a history of CVE (myocardial infarctions, and its revascularization, stroke) was recorded. RESULTS: Hypothyroidism was diagnosed in 17.4% of RA patients. Patients with hypothyroidism (group 1) were more likely to have AO and less likely to consume unsufficient dietary fiber than patients with euthyroidism (group 2). Moderate, high and very high risk of development according to the mSCORE and FINDRISC was detected in 61.5% of hypothyroid patients and 48.8% euthyroid patients, according to mSCORE alone - in 30.8 and 44.7%, according to FINDRISC - in 0 and 2.4%, respectively (p>0.05 in all cases); 11.5% of patients in group 1 and 6.5% in group 2 suffered from CVE (OR 1.875, 95% CI 0.462-7.607; p=0.63). CONCLUSION: It is necessary to evaluate the thyroid gland function, especially in patients with AO due to the high frequency of hypothyroidism in RA. Hypothyroidism did not have an independent effect on the severe CVЕ rates, as well as risk assessment according to the score and FINDRISC in RA patients. Theses, with and without hypothyroidism, were predominantly in the moderate, high, very high risk groups according to both scales.

Glycemic status and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in populations at risk of diabetes in two Latin American cities.

PURPOSE: To estimate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) according to glycemic status, and its relationship with sociodemographic and clinical factors in a population at risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Cross-sectional study, using cluster sampling. Data were collected from 1135 participants over 30 years of age, at risk of developing T2D from the PREDICOL project. Participants' glycemic status was defined using an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Participants were divided into normoglycemic subjects (NGT), prediabetes and diabetics do not know they have diabetes (UT2D). HRQOL was assessed using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire of the EuroQol group. Logistic regression and Tobit models were used to examine factors associated with EQ-5D scores for each glycemic group. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 55.6 ± 12.1 years, 76.4% were female, and one in four participants had prediabetes or unknown diabetes. Participants reported problems most frequently on the dimensions of Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression in the different glycemic groups. The mean EQ-5D score in NGT was 0.80 (95% CI 0.79-0.81), in prediabetes, 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.83), and in participants with UT2D of 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.82), respectively. Female sex, older age, city of residence, lower education, receiving treatment for hypertension, and marital status were significantly associated with lower levels of HRQOL in the Tobit regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL of NGT, prediabetes, and UT2D participants was statistically similar. However, factors such as gender, age. and place of residence were found to be significant predictors of HRQOL for each glycemic group.

Using HbA1c measurements and the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score to identify undiagnosed individuals and those at risk of diabetes in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of people in Northern Iceland with prediabetes, at risk of developing T2DM or with manifest undiagnosed T2DM, as this information is lacking in Iceland. METHODS: A cross-sectional study. Clients of the three largest primary health care centres in the Health Care Institution of North Iceland (HSN) were invited to participate if fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: a) aged between 18 and 75 years, b) not diagnosed with diabetes, c) speaking and understanding Icelandic or English fluently and d) living in the included service area. Data collection took place via face-to-face interviews between 1 March 2020 and 15 May 2021. Participation included answering the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC), measuring the HbA1c levels and background information. RESULTS: Of the 220 participants, 65.9% were women. The mean age was 52.1 years (SD ± 14.1) and FINDRISC scores were as follows: 47.3% scored ≤8 points, 37.2% scored between 9 and 14 points, and 15.5% scored between 15 and 26 points. The mean HbA1c levels in mmol/mol, were 35.5 (SD ± 3.9) for men and 34.4 (SD ± 3.4) for women, ranging from 24 to 47. Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 was found in 32% of men and 35.9% of women. Prevalence of prediabetes in this cohort was 13.2%. None of the participants had undiagnosed T2DM. Best sensitivity and specificity for finding prediabetes was by using cut-off points of ≥11 on FINDRISC, which gave a ROC curve of 0.814. CONCLUSIONS: The FINDRISC is a non-invasive and easily applied screening instrument for prediabetes. Used in advance of other more expensive and invasive testing, it can enable earlier intervention by assisting decision making, health promotion actions and prevention of the disease burden within primary health care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a pre-phase of the registered study "Effectiveness of Nurse-coordinated Follow up Program in Primary Care for People at risk of T2DM" at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT01688359). Registered 30 December 2020.

10-Year Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Survey of Rural Communities in Southern Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The exponential rise in the prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) necessitates the introduction of strategies for early diagnosis to reduce the burden of the disease. This study assessed the prevalence of prediabetes and also determined the 10-year risk of developing T2DM in Southern Nigerian rural communities by adopting the validated Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) tool. METHODS: 273 participants from 3 Southern rural communities aged 18 years and older were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Data in the FINDRISC stratification tool and Random Blood Glucose (RBG) variables were obtained for the participants. IBM SPSS version 21 was used to analyze the data with a level of significance put at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The participants' mean age was 54.20±16.61 years. The prevalence of prediabetes among the study participants based on RBG was 4.8% (3.8% of males and 6.6% of females, respectively). Most of the study participants (41%) had a low risk of developing T2DM which meant that 1 in 100 participants would become diabetic in a 10-year period, based on the FINDRISC scale. Amongst the male participants, the Total Diabetes Risk Score (TDRS) showed significant positive correlation with the RBG (r=0.315, p=0.001); similarly, a weak positive correlation between TDRS and RBG was noted among female participants. CONCLUSION: The propensity of developing T2DM in 10 years was indisputably low amongst rural dwellers in the Southern Nigerian rural communities studied. Further studies to compare the risk of developing T2DM between rural and urban communities would be required.

CONTEXTE: L'augmentation exponentielle de la prévalence du diabète de type 2 (DT2) nécessite l'introduction de stratégies de diagnostic précoce pour réduire le fardeau de la maladie. Cette étude évalue la prévalence du prédiabète et détermine également le risque sur 10 ans de développer un DT2 dans les communautés rurales du sud du Nigeria en adoptant l'outil validé FINDRISC (Finnish Diabetes Risk Score). MÉTHODES: 273 participants de 3 communautés rurales du sud du pays âgés de 18 ans et plus ont été recrutés dans cette étude transversale. Les données de l'outil de stratification FINDRISC et les variables de la glycémie aléatoire (RBG) ont été obtenues pour les participants. IBM SPSS version 21 a été utilisé pour analyser les données avec un niveau de signification mis à p < 0,05. RÉSULTATS: L'âge moyen des participants était de 54,20±16,61 ans. La prévalence du prédiabète parmi les participants à l'étude, basée sur le RBG, était de 4,8% (3,8% des hommes et 6,6% des femmes respectivement). La plupart des participants à l'étude (41%) présentaient un faible risque de développer un DT2, ce qui signifie que 1 participant sur 100 deviendrait diabétique sur une période de 10 ans, selon l'échelle FINDRISC. Chez les hommes, le score total de risque de diabète (TDRS) a montré une corrélation positive significative avec le RBG (r=0,315, p=0,001) ; de même, une faible corrélation positive entre le TDRS et le RBG a été notée chez les femmes. CONCLUSION: La propension à développer un DT2 en 10 ans est indiscutablement faible chez les habitants des communautés rurales du sud du Nigeria étudiées. D'autres études visant à comparer le risque de développer un DT2 entre les communautés rurales et urbaines seraient nécessaires. Mots clés: FINDRISC, Nigeria, TDRS, Diabète de type 2, Prédiabète, Habitants ruraux.

FINDRISC Modified for Latin America as a Screening Tool for Persons with Impaired Glucose Metabolism in Ciudad Bolívar, Venezuela.

OBJECTIVE: The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) includes anthropometric, metabolic, and lifestyle factors that predict type 2 diabetes mellitus. The objective of this study was to evaluate the FINDRISC modified for Latin America (LA-FINDRISC) as a screening tool for persons with impaired glucose metabolism in Ciudad Bolívar, Venezuela. METHODS: Subjects aged between 18 and 70 years of both sexes without known diabetes were invited to participate. After informed consent, they were screened with the LA-FINDRISC questionnaire and then given an oral glucose tolerance test, using the American Diabetes Association criteria for diagnosis. To obtain the cutoff point of LA-FINDRISC for predicting impaired glucose regulation, a receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed. RESULTS: A total of 200 subjects were evaluated, 64.5% female, with a mean age of 35.20 ± 13.84 years. Of these, 158 (79%) did not present with carbohydrate metabolism disorder, while 42 (21%) did. Age (p = 0.0001), body mass index (p = 0.011), and waist circumference (p = 0.031) were significantly higher in subjects with impaired glucose regulation when compared to those without it. There were a significantly greater number of sedentary (p = 0.039) and hypertensive subjects (p = 0.0001), as well as those with a history of glucose >100 mg/dL (p = 0.0001), in the impaired glucose metabolism group. A cutoff LA-FINDRISC of 14 points predicted a high risk of impaired glucose regulation with a sensitivity of 45.2% and a specificity of 89.9%. CONCLUSION: A LA-FINDRISC >14 points had low sensitivity but high specificity for predicting carbohydrate metabolism disorders in this group of patients from Ciudad Bolívar.

Undetected dysglycaemia common in primary care patients treated for hypertension and/or dyslipidaemia: on the need for a screening strategy in clinical practice. A report from EUROASPIRE IV a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology.

BACKGROUND: Dysglycaemia defined as type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The negative impact is more apparent in the presence of hypertension and/or dyslipidaemia. Thus, it seems reasonable to screen for dysglycaemia in patients treated for hypertension and/or dyslipidaemia. A simple screening algorithm would enhance the adoption of such strategy in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses (1) that dysglycaemia is common in patients with hypertension and/or dyslipidaemia and (2) that initial screening with the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) will decrease the need for laboratory based tests. METHODS: 2395 patients (age 18-80 years) without (i) a history of CVD or TDM2, (ii) prescribed blood pressure and/or lipid lowering drugs answered the FINDRISC questionnaire and had an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and HbA1c measured. RESULTS: According to the OGTT 934 (39%) had previously undetected dysglycaemia (T2DM 19%, IGT 20%). Of patients, who according to FINDRISC had a low, moderate or slightly elevated risk 20, 34 and 41% and of those in the high and very high-risk category 49 and 71% had IGT or T2DM respectively. The OGTT identified 92% of patients with T2DM, FPG + HbA1c 90%, FPG 80%, 2hPG 29% and HbA1c 22%. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The prevalence of dysglycaemia was high in patients treated for hypertension and/or dyslipidaemia. (2) Due to the high proportion of dysglycaemia in patients with low to moderate FINDRISC risk scores its initial use did not decrease the need for subsequent glucose tests. (3) FPG was the best test for detecting T2DM. Its isolated use is limited by the inability to disclose IGT. A pragmatic strategy, decreasing the demand for an OGTT, would be to screen all patients with FPG followed by OGTT in patients with IFG.

Diabetes primary prevention program: New insights from data analysis of recruitment period.

BACKGROUND: Primary Prevention of Diabetes Program in Buenos Aires Province evaluates the effectiveness of adopting healthy lifestyle to prevent type 2 diabetes (T2D) in people at high risk of developing it. We aimed to present preliminary data analysis of FINDRISC and laboratory measurements taken during recruitment of people for the Primary Prevention of Diabetes Program in Buenos Aires Province in the cities of La Plata, Berisso, and Ensenada, Argentina. METHODS: People were recruited through population approach (house-to-house survey by FINDRISC in randomized areas) and opportunistic approach (FINDRISC completed by participants during consultations for nonrelated prediabetes/diabetes symptoms in public and private primary care centres of cities involved). In people with FINDRISC score ≥ 13 points, we evaluated blood concentrations of HbA1c , creatinine, lipids, and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). RESULTS: Approximately 3415 individuals completed the FINDRISC populational survey and 344 the opportunistic survey; 43% of the 2 groups scored over 13 points; 2.8 and 75.4% of them, respectively, took the prescribed OGTT. Approximately 53.7% of the OGTT showed normal values and 5.2% unknown T2D. The remaining cases showed 69.5% impaired fasting glucose, 13.6% impaired glucose tolerance, and 16.9% both impairments. HbA1c values showed significant differences compared with normal glucose tolerance (4.96 ± 0.43%), prediabetes (5.28 ± 0.51%), and T2D (5.60 ± 0.51%). Participants with prediabetes and T2D showed a predominant increase in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol values. In prediabetes, >50% showed insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: People with prediabetes/T2D had dyslipidemia associated with insulin resistance, which promotes the development of T2D and cardiovascular disease. Thus, it merits its appropriate treatment.

Cost-effectiveness of a risk-based secondary screening programme of type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a long-term economic model for type 2 diabetes to describe the entire spectrum of the disease over a wide range of healthcare programmes. The model evaluates a public health, risk-based screening programme in a country specific setting. METHODS: The lifespan of persons and important phases of the disease and related interventions are recorded in a Markov model, which first simulates the effect of screening, then replicates important complications of diabetes, follows the progression of individuals through physiological variables and finally calculates outcomes in monetary and naturalistic units. RESULTS: The introduction of the screening programme nearly doubled the proportion of diagnosed patients at the age of 50 and prolonged life expectancy. Three-yearly screening gained 0.0229 quality adjusted life years for an additional €83 per person compared with no screening and resulted an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €3630/quality adjusted life years. CONCLUSION: From the economic perspective introduction of the 3-yearly screening programme is justifiable and it provides a good value for money. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[FINDRISC as screening for detection of prediabetes and unknown type 2 diabetes]. / Evaluación del puntaje FINDRISC para detección de prediabetes y diabetes tipo 2 sin diagnóstico.

INTRODUCTION: It is fundamental to put into practice preventive and early population diagnosis actions to detect people at risk for developing Type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of this study was to evaluate the FINDRISC score performance as screening method to detect prediabetes and unknown T2D in municipal workers. METHODS: descriptive epidemiological and crosssectional study from 10/21 to 03/22. People suffering from a severe illness, pregnant or were already receiving drugs that modify blood glucose, were excluded. Participants completed the FINDRISC and performed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The performance of the FINDRISC was determined by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC-ROC). The Youden's J statistic index was used to define the optimal cutoff point. RESULTS: 148 subjects between the ages of 18-65 were admitted, with a mean age of 42,9 ± 11,8, the 69% being males. The frequency of unknown T2D was of 3.3% (n = 5) and frequency of prediabetes was of 12.2% (n = 18). The mean of FINDRISC score was of 10.0 ± 4.8. The optimal cutoff point was ≥ 13 (sensitivity = 65.2%, Specificity = 74.4%) and the AUC-ROC 0.76 (IC95%: 0.66-0.86). CONCLUSION: The FINDRISC proved to be an effective method for identifying people with undiagnosed T2D and prediabetes with a cut-off point of 13 in the population, place, and study period.

Introducción: Es fundamental poner en práctica acciones preventivas y de diagnóstico poblacional precoz para detectar a las personas en riesgo de desarrollar Diabetes tipo 2 (DT2). El objetivo del trabajo fue evaluar el desempeño del score FINDRISC como método de cribado para detectar prediabetes y DT2 sin diagnostico en trabajadores municipales. Métodos: Estudio epidemiológico, descriptivo de corte transversal desde 10/21 al 3/22. Ingresaron voluntarios mayores a 18 años sin diagnóstico previo de DT2, se excluyó quienes padecían una enfermedad aguda, embarazadas o que realizaban tratamiento con medicamentos que modifiquen la glucemia. Los participantes completaron el FINDRISC y realizaron una Prueba Oral de Tolerancia a la Glucosa (POTG). El desempeño se determinó mediante el cálculo de la sensibilidad (S), especificidad (E), y el área bajo la curva (AUC-ROC). Se utilizó un índice de Youden para definir el punto de corte óptimo. Resultados: Ingresaron 148 personas, entre 18-67 años, con media de edad 42.9 ± 11.8 años, el 68.9% de sexo masculino. La frecuencia de DT2 sin diagnóstico fue del 3.3% (n = 5) y de prediabetes del 12.2% (n = 18). El promedio de puntos de FINDRISC fue de 10.0 ± 4.8. El punto de corte optimo fue ≥ 13 (S = 65.2% y E = 74.4%) y el AUC-ROC 0.76 (IC95%: 0.66-0.86). Conclusión: El FINDRISC demostró ser un método eficaz para identificar personas con DT2 y prediabetes con punto de corte 13 en la población, lugar y periodo de estudio.

Identifying diabetes risks among Indonesians: A cross-sectional study in a community setting.

Background: There is an upward surge in diabetes patients worldwide, including in Indonesia, annually. Diabetes can lead to new diseases that burden patients' lives further. Nurses can reduce this problem by identifying people at risk of developing diabetes and educating them on how to prevent diabetes. Objective: The study aimed to determine the risk of diabetes in the Indonesian population. Methods: The descriptive research involved a sample of 1216 Indonesians living in North Sumatra Province. Participants were nondiabetic individuals selected using the convenience method from May to October 2020. This study utilized the Indonesian version of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) tool and employed various statistical analyses, including frequencies, percentages, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test. Results: Of the total samples, 372 were males (30.6%), and 844 were females (69.4%). The risk of developing diabetes was classified as low (57.1%), slightly elevated (36.4%), moderate (5.3%), high (1.0%), and very high (0.2%). Only one of the eight risk factors that differed significantly between men and women was a history of elevated blood glucose levels, with a p-value of 0.02. Conclusion: The study identified a portrait of the number and percentage of diabetes risk factors in a community setting in Indonesia. Nurses must provide education on diabetes prevention to not only members of the local community at the research site but also the general public, nationally and globally.

Feasibility of a Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Program at Nationwide Level in General Practice: A Pilot Study in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions halt the progression of prediabetes to frank type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the feasibility of a diabetes prevention program promoting tailored interventions on a national scale and conducted by primary care physicians is unclear. METHODS: General practitioners located in ten different regions throughout Italy enrolled random subjects without known metabolic diseases to identify individuals with prediabetes and prescribe them an intervention based on physical activity. Using a simple stepwise approach, people referring to their primary care physician for any reason were screened for their diabetes risk with a web-based app of the Findrisc questionnaire. Those at risk for T2D, i.e., with a Findrisc score >9, were invited to come back after overnight fasting to measure fasting glycaemia (FG). Those with 100 ≤ FG < 126 mg/dL were considered as people with prediabetes and compiled the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) to then receive a personalised prescription of physical activity. RESULTS: Overall, 5928 people were enrolled and compiled the questionnaire. Of these, 2895 (48.8%) were at risk for T2D. Among these, FG was measured in 2168 subjects (participation rate 75%). The numbers of individuals with undetected prediabetes and T2D according to FG were 755 and 79 (34.8% and 3.6% of those assessing FG), respectively. Of the 755 subjects in the prediabetes range, 739 compiled the PAR-Q and started a personalised program of physical activity (participation rate 97%). Physicians involved in the study reported a mean of 6 min to perform the screening. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data suggest the feasibility of a national diabetes prevention program developed by general practitioners using a simple stepwise approach starting from a web app to intercept individuals with prediabetes.

[Detection of people at risk of having diabetes in the community pharmacy with the Findrisc test 2014-2021]. / Detección de personas en riesgo de padecer diabetes en la farmacia comunitaria con el test de Findrisc en los años 2014-2021.

Aim: To analyze diabetes risk screening using the Findrisc questionnaire, performed in Spanish community pharmacies (CP) since 2014. Methods: Descriptive cumulative study of the results of campaigns from Global Diabetes Day, in 2014, 2016-2018, 2020 and 2021. Subjects: Users ≥18 years not diagnosed with diabetes with signed consent. Variables: Findrisc test score, mean (m) and standard deviation (SD) and subjects at risk intervals, n (%). Demographic (sex, age) and anthropometric variables, body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), waist circumference (cm), capillary glycaemia (SD) (mg/dL). Results: A total of 1146 pharmacists took part; 12,402 users. A total of 8799 (70.9%) had BMI ≥25 kg/m2; 7366 (59.4%) were taking anti-hypertensives, 6047 (48.8%) with excessive abdominal circumference. In total, 5962 (48.0%) had a family history of diabetes.Average risk (Findrisc score) was 11.3 (4.6), without any sex differences (P>0.05). The number of subjects with high/very high risk (F≥15) was 3107 (25.0%) without any sex differences (P>0.05). The high/very high risk increased with age, from 282 (15.1%) people aged 45 to 54 up to 1695 (40.1%) people aged >64. A total of 1762 (14.2%) were referred to the doctor. There are no data on the result.Average interview time: 10.3 (5.3) minutes, no differences between sexes (P>0.05). Conclusions: One quarter of those surveyed had a high/very high risk and one in seven were referred to the doctor.The most prevalent risk factors were BMI, hypertension, abdominal circumference and family history of diabetes.Interprofessional communication should be improved as no result was obtained from referrals to the doctor.

The association between sociodemographic characteristics, clinical indicators and body mass index in a population at risk of type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study in two Colombian cities.

AIMS: To assess the association between sociodemographic and clinical factors with body mass index (BMI) in a population at risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Bogotá and Barranquilla, Colombia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the PREDICOL Study. Participants with a FINDRISC ≥ 12 who underwent an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) were included in the study (n=1166). The final analytical sample size was 1101 participants. Those with missing data were excluded from the analysis (n=65). The main outcome was body mass index (BMI), which was categorized as normal, overweight, and obese. We utilized unadjusted and adjusted ordinal logistic regression analysis to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The prevalence of overweight and obesity was 41 % (n=449) and 47 % (n=517), respectively. Participants with a 2-hour glucose ≥139 mg/dl had 1.71 times higher odds of being overweight or obese (regarding normal weight) than participants with normal 2-hour glucose values. In addition, being a woman, waist circumference altered, and blood pressure >120/80 mmHg were statistically significantly associated with a higher BMI. CONCLUSION: Strategies to control glycemia, blood pressure, and central adiposity are needed in people at risk of T2D. Future studies should be considered with a territorial and gender focus, considering behavioral, and sociocultural patterns.

[Diagnostic performance of the FINDRISC questionnaire to identify insulin resistance in adults]. / Certeza diagnóstica del instrumento FINDRISC para identificar resistencia a la insulina en adultos.

Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a state prior to the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and it is reversible with lifestyle modification. However, it is underdiagnosed due to the difficulty in its measurement. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the FINDRISC questionnaire to identify IR. Material and methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was performed in adults aged 20 to 60 years without previous diagnosis of T2D. Those using steroids and pregnant women were excluded. IR was diagnosed through the Triglycerides/glucose index. A ROC curve was used to establish the cut-off point for the diagnosis of IR. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated. Risk measurement for IR was performed with the FINDRISC instrument. Results: A total of 253 participants were included, with a prevalence of IR of 60.8%. The area under the curve of the FINDRISC instrument was 0.813 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.759-0.865), with a cut-off point of 8. Sensitivity was 94.8% and specificity was 48.5%, positive predictive value was 74% and negative 86%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.84 and a negative of 0.11. Conclusions: The FINDRISC instrument is a useful screening tool to identify subjects with IR at the first level of care. A score ≥ 8 identifies subjects with IR.

Introducción: la resistencia a la insulina (RI) es un estado previo al desarrollo de diabetes tipo 2 (DT2) y es reversible con modificación en el estilo de vida. Sin embargo, este estado se encuentra subdiagnosticado por la dificultad en su medición. Objetivo: evaluar el desempeño diagnóstico del cuestionario FINDRISC para identificar RI. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio transversal analítico en adultos de 20 a 60 años sin diagnóstico previo de DT2. Fueron excluidos quienes utilizaran esteroides y mujeres embarazadas. La RI fue diagnosticada mediante el índice triglicéridos/glucosa. Una curva ROC fue utilizada para establecer el punto de corte para el diagnóstico de RI. Se calculó sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos y razones de verosimilitud. La medición del riesgo para RI se realizó con el instrumento FINDRISC. Resultados: se incluyeron 253 participantes, con una prevalencia de RI de 60.8%. El área bajo la curva del instrumento FINDRISC fue de 0.813 (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%] 0.759-0.865), con un punto de corte de 8. La sensibilidad fue de 94.8%, con una especificidad de 48.5%, valor predictivo positivo de 74% y negativo de 86%, con una razón de verosimilitud positiva de 1.84 y una negativa de 0.11. Conclusiones: el instrumento FINDRISC puede ser una herramienta útil para identificar a sujetos con resistencia a la insulina en el primer nivel de atención. Un puntaje igual o mayor que 8 identifica a sujetos con RI.

Prediabetes is more than a pre-disease: additional evidences supporting the importance of its early diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

AIM: To identify Prediabetes (PreD) as early and serious diabetes step using clinical-biochemical characteristics in the population of the Primary Prevention Diabetes Buenos Aires (PPDBA) study. METHODS: PPDBA Study evaluated benefits of adopting healthy lifestyles to prevent T2D. It recruited people 45-75 years of age with PreD (impaired fasting glycaemia [IFG], impaired glucose tolerance [IGT] or both, American Diabetes Association criteria), using an opportunistic approach. They completed a FINDRISC questionnaire, and those with a score ≥13 points were invited to participate. When they accepted, we performed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with a complete lipid profile and HbA1c while physicians completed a clinical history. We recruited 367 persons, and depending on OGTT results, the sample was divided into normals (NGT), PreD, or with diabetes (last one was excluded in our analysis). Data were statistically analyzed using parametric and nonparametric tests and logistic regression to identify parameters associated with PreD. RESULTS: From the recruited (n = 367) 47.7% have NGT, 48.5% PreD and 3.8% unknown T2D (excluded). People with PreD were significantly older, with a higher percentage of overweight/obesity, BMI, and larger waist circumference than NGT. They also showed significantly higher fasting and 2 h post glucose load, HbA1c, and triglyceride levels. No significant differences were recorded in the blood pressure, lipid profile though both groups had abnormally high LDL-c values. They also had a larger percentage of TG/HDL-c ratios (insulin resistance indicator) (55% vs. 37.5%). Logistic regression analysis showed that PreD was significant associated with age, waist circumference, and triglyceride above target values. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that clinical and biochemical parameters were significantly different between people with PreD and those with NGT. This evidence supports the concept that PreD is a serious dysfunction, which should be early diagnosed and treated properly to prevent its transition to T2D and its complications.

ModAsian FINDRISC as a Screening Tool for People with Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Vietnam: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Purpose: Our study aims to evaluate the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in the next 10 years using ModAsian FINDRISC and additionally explore associated factors among the Vietnam population. Participants and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 2258 participants aged 25 years old or above in Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam. The sample size is calculated based on the estimated sensitivity, and participants were randomly selected from different geographical and socio-economic areas. All participants were thoroughly medically examined, taking blood lipid profile and fasting blood glucose, taking blood pressure, anthropometric indexes, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and behavioral factors were investigated using the Vietnamese version of the WHO STEPS toolkit. The risk of developing T2DM was made based on the ModAsian FINDRISC. Results: The incidence of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus among the study population was 4.21%. The group with a high or very high risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in the next 10 years accounted for 2.52%. Body mass index (AUC = 0.840, 95% CI: 0.792-0.888), waist circumference (AUC = 0.824, 95% CI: 0.777-0.871), family history of diabetes mellitus (AUC = 0.751, 95% CI = 0.668-0.833), and history of antihypertensive medication use regularly (AUC = 0.708, 95% CI: 0.632-0.784) are the most associated factors of the ModAsian FINDRISC. Residential location (OR = 5.62, 95% CI: 1.91-16.54) and occupational status (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.20-0.62) were significant factors associated with a high and very high risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in the next 10 year. Conclusion: Screening for the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and implementing intervention programs focusing on controlling weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure are essential for reducing type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and burden in Vietnam.

Finnish diabetes risk score outperformed triglyceride-glucose index in diabetes risk prediction.

Purpose: Triglyceride-Glucose (TyG) index is a surrogate marker of insulin resistance. This study compared the performance of TyG index and the Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) in diabetes risk prediction. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 122 young adults (aged 15-35 years) in Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria. Anthropometric measurements and biochemical analysis were done following standard protocols. Diabetes risk scoring was done using the FINDRISC questionnaire. TyG index was calculated logarithmically. Discrimination between TyG index and FINDRISC was done by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: High risk participants had significantly (p < 0.001) higher mean values of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) relative to the lower risk categories. Participants in TyG index Quartile 4 had significantly higher mean values of triglyceride (p < 0.001) and fasting plasma glucose (p < 0.05). BMI and triglyceride had the most significant (p < 0.001) positive correlation with FINDRISC and TyG index, respectively. A moderately elevated to high risk (FINDRISC ≥ 12) of developing diabetes was found in 14.8% of the participants; with a female preponderance (20.6%) relative to males (7.4%). More than half of the participants (52.5%) had slightly elevated risk and differences in diabetes risk susceptibility were significant (p < 0.001) across gender. FINDRISC had an AUC value of 0.826 while TyG index had an AUC value of 0.628 for diabetes risk prediction. Conclusion: FINDRISC had a better performance than TyG index in the prediction of diabetes risk in this population. The use of other TyG-related parameters rather than TyG index is recommended in future studies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01252-y.

Association between the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score and cancer in middle-aged and older adults: Involvement of inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with increased risk of common cancers. However, evidence of cancer risk in individuals with different diabetes risk is still scarce, and the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) and risks of cancer incidence and mortality in a prospective study, and to explore whether low-grade inflammation partially mediated the association. METHODS: A total of 330,384 participants aged 37 to 73 at baseline from the UK Biobank database was included in this study. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the relationship of the FINDRISC and low-grade inflammation with risks of cancer incidence and mortality. Then, we estimated the contribution of higher FINDRISC to risks of overall and site-specific cancers. In addition, the role of low-grade inflammation in the association between FINDRISC and cancer risks was investigated through mediation analysis. RESULTS: The increased FINDRISC was dose-dependently associated with higher incidence and mortality risks of overall cancer and an overwhelming majority of site-specific cancers. The higher FINDRISC was a strong contributor to incidence of eighteen site-specific cancers and mortality of fourteen site-specific cancers, with a population-attributable risk of 8.1 %-39.1 %, 14.2 %-39.7 %, respectively. Additionally, low-grade inflammation mainly mediated the association between the FINDRISC and risks of incidence and mortality of overall cancer, colorectal cancer, etc. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted the higher FINDRISC as critical risk factors of cancer incidence and mortality, partially mediated by low-grade inflammation. Individuals with increased risk of diabetes are also needed to be concerned about cancer prevention.

Effectiveness of a collaborative diabetes screening campaign between community pharmacies and general practitioners.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative screening campaign on the prevalence of pre-diabetes and diabetes among the screened population. METHODS: A Longitudinal, multicentre study was developed. The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) was applied to the eligible population in the participating community pharmacies. Individuals with a FINDRISC score ≥ 15, were eligible to measure their glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level at the community pharmacy. If HbA1c≥ 5.7%, participants were referred to a general practitioner (GP) appointment for potential diagnosis of Diabetes. RESULTS: Out of 909 screened subjects, 405 (44.6%) presented a FINDRISC score ≥ 15. Among the latter, 94 (23.4%) had HbA1c levels that made them eligible for GP referral, of which 35 (37.2%) completed the scheduled appointments. 24 participants were diagnosed with pre-diabetes, and 11 with diabetes. The prevalence was estimated at 2.5% (CI95% 1.6-3.8%) and 7.8% (CI95% 6.2-9.8%) for diabetes and pre-diabetes, respectively. CONCLUSION: This collaborative model has proved to be effective in the early detection of diabetes and pre-diabetes. Joint initiatives between health professionals can play a pivotal role in the prevention and diagnosis of diabetes, which may lead to a reduction on the burden to health system and society.

Identifying Adult Population at Risk for Undiagnosed Diabetes Mellitus in Medan City, Indonesia Targeted on Diabetes Prevention.

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a health problem in Indonesia, where its prevalence rises annually. The condition may negatively impact one's quality of life and lead to significant complications-over 50% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the most common diabetes type worldwide. To implement diabetic prevention interventions and achieve effective diabetes mellitus control, screening for undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in high-risk populations is essential. Objective: This study aimed to identify people at risk for undiagnosed diabetes mellitus using the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out, which involved 300 people in Medan City between the ages of 30-75. The study was conducted between July 14 and October 20, 2020. The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score and anthropometric measurements (weight, height, and waist circumference) were used to evaluate each respondent. Low, medium, and high-risk outcome categories were created. All responders underwent oral glucose tolerance tests, with results classified as normal, prediabetes, or diabetes. The Chi-square test was used to examine the data and identify potential risk variables for diabetes mellitus. Results: Of 300 individuals, 91.7% were female, and 8.3% were male. 33.7% of participants had a low risk of acquiring diabetes, 55.0% had an intermediate risk, and 11.3% had a high risk. 70% of participants who took an oral glucose tolerance test had blood glucose levels that were normal (less than 100 mg/dl), 18.7% had blood glucose levels suggestive of prediabetes (between 100 and 125 mg/dl), and 11.3% had blood glucose levels suggestive of diabetes (126 mg/dl or higher). Ages 54 to 64 years and older, high body mass index and central obesity, a lack of vegetables and fruits in the daily diet, inactivity, uncontrolled hypertension, a history of hyperglycemia, and a family history of diabetes were all linked to a significant increase in the risk of developing diabetes. Most respondents at low risk of developing type 2 diabetes had normal blood sugar levels, while those at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes had high blood glucose levels (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Oral glucose tolerance testing and the FINDRISC questionnaire may be used to identify individuals who are at high risk for developing diabetes and to encourage them to adopt healthy behaviours.