Preventing varus collapse in proximal humerus fracture fixation: 90-90 dual plating versus endosteal fibular allograft strut.

INTRODUCTION: Screw cut out and varus collapse are the most common complication of locked plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare dual plating and endosteal fibular allograft struts as augmentation strategies to prevent varus collapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A trapezoidal osteotomy was created at the metaphysis to create a 2-part proximal humerus model in 18 paired shoulder specimens. Each specimen was assigned to group A, B, or C and was fixed with either a lateral locking plate, a lateral locking plate and anterior one-third tubular plate in an orthogonal 90/90 configuration, or a lateral locking plate with intramedullary fibular strut, respectively. The specimens were stressed in axial compression to failure. Displacement, elastic limit, ultimate load, and stiffness were recorded and calculated. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean cyclic displacement between the three groups (0.71 mm vs 0.89 mm vs 0.61 mm for Group A, B, C, respectively). Lateral plating demonstrated the greatest absolute and relative displacement at the elastic limit (5.3 mm ± 1.5 and 4.4 mm ± 1.3) without significance. The elastic limit or yield point was greatest for fibular allograft, Group C (1223 N ± 501 vs 1048 N ± 367 for Group B and 951 N ± 249 for Group A) without significance. CONCLUSIONS: Dual plating of proximal humerus fractures in a 90-90 configuration demonstrates similar biomechanical properties as endosteal fibular strut allograft. Both strategies demonstrate superior stiffness to isolated lateral locked plating.

Improved outcomes for proximal humerus fracture open reduction internal fixation augmented with a fibular allograft in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To date, no meta-analysis has been performed on the efficacy of fibular allograft augmentation for the management of proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of proximal humerus fractures treated with a locking compression plate (LCP) with or without fibular allograft augmentation. METHODS: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were queried in June of 2021 for literature comparing the radiographic and clinical outcomes for patients with proximal humerus fractures that were treated with an LCP only or an LCP augmented with a fibular allograft. Data describing study design, level of evidence, demographic information, final follow-up, radiographic changes in humeral head height (HHH), radiographic changes in neck shaft angle (NSA), final American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, final Constant-Murley scores, and major complications were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). A meta-analysis was performed using pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) to compare changes in HHH, NSA, final ASES and final Constant-Murley scores between the 2 groups; a pooled odds ratio (OR) was used to compare complications between the groups. RESULTS: Ten studies with a total of 802 patients were identified. There was a significant difference that favored patients augmented with a fibular allograft for change in HHH (WMD = -2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.49 to -2.31; P < .00001), change in NSA (WMD = -5.71; 95% CI, -6.69 to -4.72; P < .00001), final ASES scores (WMD = 5.08; 95% CI, 3.69-6.48; P < .00001), and OR for developing a major complication (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.59; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in final Constant-Murley scores (WMD = 3.36; 95% CI, -0.21 to 6.93; P = .06) or revision surgery rate (P = .182) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The pooled WMD and prediction interval suggest that 95% of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with an LCP augmented with a fibular allograft will have improved radiographic outcomes, improved ASES clinical outcome scores, and decreased odds of a major complication when compared with patients treated with an LCP alone. Limitations of this study include a relatively short average final follow-up time (<2 years) and a potential lack of standardization for radiographic outcomes among included studies.

The potential of locking plate with intramedullary fibular allograft to manage proximal humeral fracture with an unstable medial column.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of locking compression plate with intramedullary fibular allograft in managing proximal humeral fractures with an unstable medial column. METHODS: Between March 2007 and March 2015, we retrospectively analyzed 63 patients who underwent locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fracture with an unstable medial column. All patients were assigned into group 1 (patients treated with locking plate) and group 2 (patients treated with locking plate with intramedullary fibular allograft). Groups 1 and 2 were composed of 29 and 34 patients, respectively. We analyzed bone union, the neck-shaft angle, the Constant score, the range of motion, and complications. RESULTS: The mean average bone union time of the patients was 13.9 weeks in group 1 and 11.3 weeks in group 2. The average Constant score was 67.4 in group 1 and 73.6 in group 2 (p < 0.05). The mean preoperative NSA, postoperative NSA, and NSA at the last follow-up were 104.4°, 125.8°, and 115.8°, respectively, in group 1, and 109.0°, 130.3°, and 127.1°, respectively, in group 2. The mean forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were 109.0°, 48.2°, 34.0°, and L5, respectively, in group 1, and 127.5°, 118.2°, 38.7°, and L1, respectively, in group 2. In group 1, avascular necrosis occurred in one patient and screw cutout in two patients. In group 2, screw cutout occurred in one patient. CONCLUSION: In patients aged over 65 years with proximal humeral fractures, an unstable medial column was associated with poor clinical results owing to varus collapse. To prevent this, an intramedullary fibular allograft was used, and radiologic and clinical results were better with this approach than with a locking plate alone. Therefore, locking plate fixation using a fibular allograft is one of the possible treatments for patients with an unstable medial column.

Cancellous bone allograft is comparable to fibular strut allograft for augmentation in three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Bone grafts have been used for augmentation and improving stability of reduced fractures in proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes after the use of cancellous bone allografts (CAs) for augmentation in 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures, and compare with fibular strut allografts (FAs). METHODS: Between November 2016 and February 2018, 55 patients, followed for at least 1 year, with 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures fixed with locking plates were included and grouped according to the type of allograft bone used for augmentation. In this retrospective analysis, we assessed and compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of the 2 groups, using the visual analog scale score, the Constant-Murley score (CMS), the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, the range of movement, neck-shaft angle (NSA), humeral head height (HHH), and the changes of NSA and HHH, as well as recording any complications. The repeatedly measured clinical and radiological outcomes were analyzed by linear mixed models. The differences in outcomes between groups at the final follow-up were compared using Student's t test. RESULTS: There were 28 patients in the CA group and 27 patients in the FA group with an average follow-up of 14.5 months. The mean age of all patients was 64 (36-86). Nonsignificant group effects were observed on CMS (ß = -8.792, P = .216), DASH (ß = 1.329, P = .094), NSA (ß = 1.432, P = .752), and HHH (ß = 1.660, P = .628). At the final follow-up, the patients in the CA group showed no significant differences in visual analog scale (1.8 vs. 2.2, P = .276), CMS (81.5 vs. 75.4, P = .072), and DASH (11.0 vs. 13.5, P = .235) scores compared with the FA group. There were no significant differences in the change of NSA (6 vs. 4, P = .387) or HHH (1 vs. 2, P = .261). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plates combined with CAs have good clinical and radiographic outcomes, similar to those treated with FAs.

Fibular strut allograft influences reduction and outcomes after locking plate fixation of comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are the third most commonly occurring fractures in elderly patients. Most of these fractures can be treated with conservative methods, but the optimal surgical treatment strategy for unstable fractures in elderly patients remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes between locking compression plate (LCP) fixation and LCP fixation with fibular allograft implantation for the treatment of comminuted PHFs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 60 patients (mean age, 72.75 years) with closed 3- or 4-part fractures, and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Fracture reduction was quantitatively determined by humeral head height (HHH) and neck-shaft angle (NSA). The clinical outcome was evaluated by Constant-Murley score (CMS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. RESULT: The average radiological changes were higher in the LCP group than in the locking plate with fibular allograft group (HHH of 4.16 mm vs 1.18 mm [p < 0.001] and NSA of 9.94° versus 3.12° [p < 0.001]) . The final average outcome scores were lower in the LCP group than in the FA group (CMS of 73.00 vs 78.96 [p = 0.024] and ASES score of 72.80 vs 78.64 [p = 0.022]). The FA group showed better forward elevation (p = 0.010) and abduction (p = 0.002); however, no significant differences were observed for shoulder external rotation or internal rotation. The number of complications was higher in the LCP group (28.57%) than in the FA group (1.2%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For comminuted PHFs in elderly patients, LCP fixation combined with a fibular allograft is reasonable option to ensure satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ZDYJLY(2018)New-9 . Name of registry: IEC for clinical Research of Zhongda Hospital, Affiliated to Southeast University. Date of registration: 2018-05-17.

Which additional augmented fixation procedure decreases surgical failure after proximal humeral fracture with medial comminution: fibular allograft or inferomedial screws?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic results between treatment with locking plate fixation and fibular allograft augmentation (FA) and treatment with locking plate fixation and additional inferomedial screws (IMSs) in 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution in geriatric patients. METHODS: We enrolled 164 patients with 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution who were treated with locking plates. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to additional augmented fixation procedures. The IMS group was composed of patients treated with additional IMSs (80 patients), whereas the FA group was treated with an additional fibular allograft (84 patients). On the basis of fracture classification, the IMS group was subdivided into those with 3-part fractures (52 patients) and those with 4-part fractures (28 patients) and the FA group was subdivided into those with 3-part fractures (55 patients) and those with 4-part fractures (29 patients). Clinical and radiographic results were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: In patients with 3-part fractures, no differences in clinical outcomes were found regardless of additional procedures. However, the FA group showed superior clinical outcomes in patients with 4-part fractures (P = .038 for Constant score and P = .045 for visual analog scale score). The postoperative neck-shaft angle was maintained in the FA group compared with the IMS group with both fracture types at the last follow-up (P = .048 for IMS vs FA with 3-part fractures and P = .023 for IMS vs FA with 4-part fractures). The number of complications was significantly higher in the IMS group (5.5%) than in the FA group (1.2%) (P = .001). CONCLUSION: An FA technique is considered a primary additional procedure for medial support in patients with 4-part proximal humeral fractures involving medial metaphyseal comminution when treated with locking plate fixation.

Pedicle Screw Track Augmentation With Fibular Allograft for Significant Bone Loss in Revision Fixation.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes for screw track augmentation with fibular allograft in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss along the screw track. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients, 18 men (60%) and 12 women (40%), with a mean age 52 years (range 34- 68). Fibular allograft was prepared by cutting it into longitudinal strips 50 mm in length. Three allograft struts were inserted into the screw track. Six mm tap used to tap between the 3 fibular struts. Eight- or 9-mm diameter, and 45 or 50 mm in length screw was then inserted. The clinical outcomes were assessed by means of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain for clinical outcome. Computed tomography scan (CT) performed at 12 months postoperative visit to assess fibular graft incorporation along the pedicle screw track, any screw loosening and the interbody as well as posterolateral fusion. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 29 months, there were statically significant improvement in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain. CT scan obtained at last follow-up showed incorporation of fibular allograft and solid fusion in all patients except one. CONCLUSION: The fibular allograft augmentation of the pedicle screw track in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss is a viable option. It allows for biologic fixation at the screw-bone interface and has some key advantages when compared to currently available methods.

Single Posterior Approach for Circumferential Debridement and Anterior Reconstruction Using Fibular Allograft in Patients With Skipped Multifocal Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis.

OBJECTIVE: Skipped multifocal pyogenic spondylodiscitis is a rare presentation of spinal infection. In our institution, we used the single posterior approach for circumferential debridement and anterior reconstruction with fibular allograft for treatment. This study aimed to ascertain the viability and reliability of this technique for these difficult cases. METHODS: Nine patients with skipped pyogenic spondylodiscitis who received our treatment method from January 2012 to December 2019 were enrolled in this study. Visual analog scale scores, causative agents, laboratory data, comorbidities, and complications were recorded. The patients' clinical conditions were evaluated based on modified Brodsky's criteria, visual analogue scale, and Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: All the patients achieved infection eradication without repeat surgical treatment. The average visual analog scale score was 8.4 (range, 8-9) before operation, which decreased to 1.9 (range, 1-3) 1 year after the surgery. No patient experienced severe complications such as neurologic deterioration or fixation failure. All patients achieved a good or excellent outcome based on modified Brodsky's criteria. The Oswestry Disability Index improved from 80.4 (range, 70-86) preoperatively to 25.1 (range, 20-32) 1 year after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our case series, good clinical outcomes and high successful rates could be achieved through the single-stage posterior-only approach. This could be considered an alternative method to manage patients with skipped pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Revision total elbow arthroplasty using intramedullary strut allograft for aseptic loosening of the humeral stem.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has become a well-accepted treatment option for many pathologies of the elbow joint. Its use in distal humerus fractures in elderly patients has become increasingly popular and has good clinical results. However, with the aging population and the increasing number of TEAs performed, so comes the potential for an increasing number of revision TEA cases. Revision TEA can be extremely challenging. In addition to the technical difficulties of safe exposure and implant removal, reimplantation of a cemented humeral component with loss of bone stock can be a challenging step in this procedure. The purpose of this article was to describe a novel technique to address aseptic loosening of the humeral stem and loss of humeral bone stock with revision of the humeral component using a long-stemmed cemented implant and intramedullary allograft fibular strut bone grafting.

Single posterior approach for circumferential debridement and anterior reconstruction using fibular allograft in patients with skipped multifocal spinal tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Skipped multifocal spinal tuberculosis (TB) is an atypical presentation of spinal TB. Surgical treatment for these unusual cases remains a challenge for spine surgeons. In our institute, we used single-stage circumferential debridement and anterior reconstruction with fibular allograft followed by posterior instrumentation through posterior-only approach for these patients. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and feasibility of this technique. METHODS: Twelve patients with skipped multifocal spinal TB who received our treatment method from January 2012 to June 2020 were enrolled in this study. The visual analog score (VAS), laboratory data, comorbidities, complications, and neurologic status based on Frankel scale were recorded. The patients' clinical conditions were evaluated based on modified Brodsky's criteria and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: All the patients were infection free at the end of the treatment. The average VAS score was 7.5 (range, 7-8) before surgery and decreased to 2.1 (range, 1-3) one year postoperatively. No one experienced any severe complications such as neurologic deterioration, fixation failure, or bone graft dislodgement. Out of the three patients requiring debridement surgery, two had wound infection and one had seroma formation. The ODI score improved from 76.8 (range, 70-84) preoperatively to 25.5 (range, 22-28) one year after surgery. All patients achieved good or excellent outcome based on modified Brodsky's criteria one year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the patients could achieve a good clinical outcome. This technique could be an alternative for patients with skipped spinal TB.

Comparison between MIPO and the deltopectoral approach with allogenous fibular bone graft in proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical differences between open reduction and plate fixation via a deltopectoral approach with allogenous fibular bone graft and a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), in Neer's classification two-, three- part proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 77 patients with two-, three-part proximal humeral fractures were treated at two different institutions. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed in 39 patients, who underwent MIPO at one institution (group A), and 38 patients, who underwent a deltopectoral approach with allo-fibular bone graft (group B) at another institution. The results between the groups were compared. RESULTS: The MIPO technique was significantly less time consuming and caused less bleeding than the deltopectoral approach with allo-fibular bone graft (P<0.05). The duration of the fracture union was significantly reduced in group A (14.5±3.4; range, 10-22 weeks) compared to group B (16.4±4.3; range, 12-28) weeks (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups when evaluating the visual analog scale and Constant scores between the two groups, 1 year postoperatively. In radiological evaluation, there was no difference in radiological outcomes between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in malunion between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The MIPO technique and deltopectoral approach with allo-fibular bone graft for two-, three-part proximal humeral fractures, show similar clinical and radiological results. However, allogenous fibular grafts require longer surgery, cause more bleeding, and result in longer fracture healing time than MIPO technique.

[Research progress in treatment of proximal humeral fracture with fibular allograft and locking plate].

OBJECTIVE: To review the research progress in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with fibular allograft and locking plate. METHODS: The literature about the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with fibular allograft and locking plate was reviewed and analyzed from the aspects such as the biomechanics, imaging prognosis, and clinical prognosis. RESULTS: Fibular allograft and locking plate can provide effective medial support for proximal humeral fracture and increase the strength of internal fixation system. Compared with locking plate, fibular allograft combined with locking plate can maintain better humeral neck-shaft angle and the humeral head height after operation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, and has better shoulder mobility and shoulder joint function, and does not increase the risk of complications. CONCLUSION: Fibular allograft combined with locking plate may be a new and effective treatment for proximal humeral fractures. However, the long-term follow-up results are insufficient, the final outcome of fibula is uncertain, and the long-term potential adverse reactions caused by this treatment are still indefinite.

Use of a locking intramedullary nail for the treatment of initial varus proximal humeral fracture: a prospective pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of locked intramedullary nailing, rather than locking plate fixation combined with fibular allograft augmentation, for initial varus proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: This prospective pilot study enrolled patients with initial varus proximal humeral fractures that were treated with a locking intramedullary nail. Radiography was performed to evaluate fracture healing. Data about the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty patients, including eight with Neer two-part and 12 with three-part fractures, were followed-up, with a mean time of 12.3 months. All patients sustained fractures that healed without re-varus. During the last follow-up, the shoulder function of the patients had recovered well, with a mean VAS pain score of 1.4, a mean CSS of 83.1, a mean DASH score of 80.8, a mean ASES score of 84.0 and a satisfactory ROM. In one patient, the proximal locking screw came out and was removed via a second surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a locking intramedullary nail alone for initial varus proximal humeral two-/three-part fractures was feasible. This treatment has advantages, such as preventing re-varus and causing milder surgical trauma, than that seen with a locking plate.

Use of a Zero-Profile Device for Contiguous 2-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: Comparison with Cage with Plate Construct.

BACKGROUND: A new zero-profile, standalone device (Zero P) was recently developed and has shown a lower incidence rate of complications and competitive clinical outcomes compared with anterior cervical cage with plate construct (CP) in single and multilevel anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, there is still concern whether Zero P is appropriate for multilevel ACDF. In addition, there have been few reports of contiguous 2-level ACDF used in conjunction with Zero P. METHODS: We reviewed contiguous 2-level ACDF performed from December 2006 to February 2015. A total of 63 patients met inclusion criteria for the study (CP group = 32 cases; Zero P group = 31 cases). All preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiologic parameters were recorded. These parameters were compared between both groups. RESULTS: The postoperative change of Cobb S over time in the Zero P group was significantly different from that in the CP group. The maintenance of Cobb S in the Zero P group was better than that in the CP group (P < 0.05). The maintenance of anterior intervertebral disk height (IDH) at postoperative assessment for the Zero P group was significantly better than that in the CP group (P < 0.05). Within-group comparison of the postoperative change of anterior and posterior IDH over time revealed that the anterior IDH was significantly lower than the posterior IDH in the Zero P group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For 2-level contiguous ACDF, the use of a zero-profile device has the capacity to show compatible outcomes in correction and maintenance of segmental angle if the anterior titanium alloy plate is properly positioned at the anterior vertebral line.

Suitability of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone cages for use as anterior struts following corpectomy.

OBJECTIVE Fibular allograft remains a widely used strut for corpectomy surgeries. The amount of graft material that can be packed into an allograft strut has not been quantified. Cages are an alternative to fibular allograft for fusion surgeries. The authors of this study assessed the suitability of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFRP) cages for anterior corpectomy surgeries. They further explored the parameters known to affect fusion rates in clinical practice. METHODS Six fibular allografts were tested at standard lengths. Three sets of carbon fiber cages (Bengal, DePuy Spine), each with a different footprint size but the same lengths, were tested. The allografts and cages were wrapped in adhesive, fluid-tight transparent barriers and filled with oil. The volume and weight of the oil instilled as well as the implant footprints were measured. The fibular allografts and cages were tested at 20-, 40-, and 50-mm lengths. Two investigators independently performed all measurements 5 times. Five CFRP cubes (1 × 1 × 1 cm) were tested under pure compression, and load versus displacement curves were plotted to determine the modulus of elasticity. RESULTS Significantly more oil fit in the CFRP cages than in the fibular allografts (p < 0.0001). The weight and volume of oil was 4-6 times greater in the cages. Interobserver (r = 0.991) and intraobserver (r = 0.993) reliability was excellent. The modulus of elasticity for CFRP was 16.44 ± 2.07 GPa. CONCLUSIONS Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone cages can accommodate much more graft material than can fibular allografts. In clinical practice, the ability to deliver greater amounts of graft material following a corpectomy may improve fusion rates.

Comparison of intramedullary fibular allograft with locking compression plate versus shoulder hemi-arthroplasty for repair of osteoporotic four-part proximal humerus fracture: Consecutive, prospective, controlled, and comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of intramedullary fibular allograft (IFA) with locking compression plates (LCPs) versus shoulder hemi-arthroplasty (HA) in osteoporotic four-part proximal humeral fracture (PHF). METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2012, totally 60 cases with osteoporotic four-part PHF were enrolled in this study and were randomly separated into IFA and LCPs group and HA group (n=30). Additionally, surgery indexes for patients in the two groups, such as Constant-Murley score (CMS), the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, individual subject evaluation of the outcomes, plain X-ray, and computer tomography (CT) scanning were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: CMS, DASH score, activities of daily living (ADL), and range of motion (ROM) were statistically higher in the IFA and LCPs group than those in the HA group at the last follow-up, whereas the pain were obviously lower than that in the HA group. Besides, patients in the IFA and LCPs group had higher abduction, external rotation with elbow, strength, and satisfactory rating compared with HA group at the last follow-up. However, one case developed avascular necrosis (AVN), one case encountered screw perforation, and one case experienced varus displacement in the IFA and LCPs group, while there were 2, 4, and 2 cases suffered from superficial infection, shoulder stiffness, tuberosity migration in the HA group, respectively. CONCLUSION: IFA with LCP have an advantage in functional outcomes than shoulder HA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. Prospective cohort study.

Management of Sacral Tumors Requiring Spino-Pelvic Reconstruction with Different Histopathologic Diagnosis: Evaluation with Four Cases.

In this retrospective study, surgical results of four patients with sacral tumors having disparate pathologic diagnoses, who were treated with partial or total sacrectomy and lumbopelvic stabilization were abstracted. Two patients were treated with partial sacral resection and two patients were treated with total sacrectomy and spinopelvic fixation. Fixation methods included spinopelvic fixation with rods and screws in two cases, reconstruction plate in one case, and fresh frozen allografts in two cases. Fibular allografts used for reconstruction accelerated bony union and enhanced the stability in two cases. Addition of polymethyl methacrylate in the cavity in the case of a giant cell tumor had a positive stabilizing effect on fixation. As a result, we can conclude that mechanical instability after sacral resection can be stabilized securely with lumbopelvic fixation and polymethyl methacrylate application or addition of fresh frozen allografts between the rods can augment the stability of the reconstruction.

How to enhance the stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures? An overview of current biomechanical and clinical data.

BACKGROUND: The complication rate after locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures is high. In addition to low bone mineral density, a lack of medial support has been identified as one of the most important factors accounting for mechanical instability. As a result of the high failure rate, different strategies have been developed to enhance the mechanical stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. The aim of the present article is to give an overview of the current biomechanical and clinical studies that focus on how to increase the stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the Medline databases using specific search terms with regard to the stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures was performed. After screening of the articles for eligibility, they were subdivided according to clinical and biomechanical aspects. RESULTS: Medial support screws, filling of bone voids and screw-tip augmentation with bone cement as well as the application of bone grafts are currently the most frequently assessed and performed methods. Although the evidence is weak, all of the mentioned strategies appear to have a positive effect on achieving and maintaining a stable reduction even of complex fractures. CONCLUSION: Further clinical studies with a higher number of patients and a higher level of evidence are required to develop a standardised treatment algorithm with regard to cement augmentation and bone grafting. Although these measures are likely to have a stabilising effect on locking plate fixation, its general use cannot be fully recommended yet.

Reconstruction of the biomechanical transfer path of femoral head necrosis: a subject-specific finite element investigation.

According to Wolff׳s law, the structure and function of bone are interdependent. The disruption of trabeculae in the necrotic femoral head destroys the biomechanical transfer path, increasing the risk of a collapse in the cortical bone. Hence, biomaterials are needed to promote osteogenesis to aid in the reconstruction of a similar biomechanical transfer path that can provide structural and biomechanical support to prevent and delay bone deterioration. Fibular allograft combined with impaction bone grafting (FAIBG) is a hip preservation method that provides both biological repair materials and biomechanical support. This method has been used successfully in the clinical setting, but it still lacks biomechanical insight. In this paper, we aim to provide a biomechanical basis for treatment using FAIBG, we used subject-specific finite element (FE) methods to analyse the biomechanical transfer characteristics of hip models: physiological, pathological and postoperative. The physiological model provided insight into the biomechanical transfer characteristics of the proximal femur. The pathological model showed an abnormal stress distribution that destroyed stress transfer capability. The postoperative model showed that FAIBG can reconstruct the biomechanical transfer path of the femoral head and reduce the risk of a collapse in the cortical bone. In conclusion, FAIBG seems to treat necrosis of the femoral head.

Clinical and radiological comparison of femur and fibular allografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases.

OBJECTIVE: This consecutive retrospective study was designed to analyze and to compare the efficacy and outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a fibular and femur allograft with anterior cervical plating. METHODS: A total of 88 consecutive patients suffering from cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) who were treated with ACDF from September 2007 to August 2010 were enrolled in this study. Thirty-seven patients (58 segments) underwent anterior interbody fusion with a femur allograft, and 51 patients (64 segments) were treated with a fibular allograft. The mean follow-up period was 16.0 (range, 12-25) months in the femur group and 19.5 (range, 14-39) months in the fibular group. Cage fracture and breakage, subsidence rate, fusion rate, segmental angle and height and disc height were assessed by using radiography. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale and neck disability index. RESULTS: At 12 months postoperatively, cage fracture and breakage had occurred in 3.4% (2/58) and 7.4% (4/58) of the patients in the femur group, respectively, and 21.9% (14/64) and 31.3% (20/64) of the patients in the fibular group, respectively (p<0.05). Subsidence was noted in 43.1% (25/58) of the femur group and in 50.5% (32/64) of the fibular group. No difference in improvements in the clinical outcome between the two groups was observed. CONCLUSION: The femur allograft showed good results in subsidence and radiologic parameters, and sustained the original cage shape more effectively than the fibular allograft. The present study suggests that the femur allograft may be a good choice as a fusion substitute for the treatment of cervical DDD.