Range of Motion Following Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparing Active Flexion and Extension With Passive Flexion Using Rubber Bands Followed by Active Extension.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the outcome in terms of range of motion between early active flexion and extension (early active motion, [EAM]) and passive flexion using rubber bands followed by active extension (sometimes referred to as a Kleinert regimen) after flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2. METHODS: Data were collected from the Swedish national health care registry for hand surgery (HAKIR). Rehabilitation regimens were decided by the preference of each caregiver. At 3 months, 828 digits (656 EAM and 172 passive flexion) and at 12 months, 448 digits (373 EAM and 75 passive flexion) were available for analysis. Thumbs were analyzed separately. RESULTS: No notable difference in total active motion was found between the groups at 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This large registry study supports the hypothesis that EAM rehabilitation may not lead to better range of motion long-term than passive motion protocols. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Cyclic testing of six-strand suture techniques for zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations.

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical analysis using cyclic testing for repaired flexor tendons is a clinically relevant method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tensile properties of two six-strand suture techniques, the triple looped suture and Yoshizu #1 suture techniques using cyclic testing under simulating early active mobilization conditions. METHODS: Twenty-five flexor digitorum profundus tendons harvested from fresh frozen human cadaver hands were repaired in zone 2 utilizing one of three repair techniques: the 2-strand modified Kessler (MK) technique as a control, the triple looped suture (TLS) and Yoshizu #1 suture (Y1) techniques. In each suture technique, 4-0 monofilament nylon sutures were used for core sutures and 6-0 monofilament nylon sutures for circumferential running sutures. Cyclic testing was performed using 20 N with 600 cycles at 1 Hz. RESULTS: Five out of eight specimens in the MK group ruptured during cyclic testing. Thus, this group was excluded from analysis. On the other hand, all tendons in the TLS and Y1 groups tolerated cyclic testing. Average gaps of the TLS and Y1 groups were 0.5 ± 0.8 mm and 1.9 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. All tendons in the TLS group and six out of nine tendons in the Y1 group formed gaps less than 2 mm. Two tendons in the Y1 group formed a gap of 3.8 and 6.6 mm had breakage of peripheral sutures at the first cycle. Mean ultimate tensile force of the TLS and Y1 group measured after cyclic tensing, were 66.2 ± 9.0 N and 65.9 ± 13.1 N, respectively. No statistical difference between the two groups was found in gap and ultimate tensile forces. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the TLS and Y1 techniques have tensile properties to allow early active mobilization. None of tendons repaired with the TLS technique had gaps more than 2 mm.

Postsurgical Rehabilitation of Flexor Tendon Injuries.

Rehabilitation after surgical repair of flexor injuries is a controversial topic. Motion at the repair site decreases risk for adhesions but increases risk for rupture. We review the current concepts behind various rehabilitation protocols based on zone of injury and the evidence behind each.

Correlations Among Objectively Measured Impairment, Outcome Classification Systems, and Subjectively Perceived Disability After Flexor Tendon Repair.

PURPOSE: Any loss of range of motion of the finger after flexor tendon repair is an impairment of function, but to what extent it causes disability is not properly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between perceived function (disability) and objectively measured loss of function (impairment), to understand what impairments are meaningful to patients. METHODS: We assessed 49 patients who underwent flexor tendon repair an average of 38 months after repair. We measured the perceived function with the visual analog scale, the 4-step rating scale (poor, fair, good, or excellent), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. The objective measurement of impairment included active range of motion at each joint, total active motion, grip strength, and 2-point discrimination. We also converted range of motion into 4 categories (poor, fair, good, and excellent) following guidelines from 3 different classification systems (American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Strickland-Glocovac, and revised Strickland). We used Spearman ρ and linear regression to assess the correlation. RESULTS: Active range of motion at the distal interphalangeal joint had a strong correlation and total active range of motion of the finger joints had a moderate correlation with perceived function measured using the visual analog scale and DASH score. Other measured impairments did not correlate with perceived function. Objective classification categories also did not correlate with the patient's own assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results validate the use of range of motion and the DASH questionnaire in assessing flexor tendon repairs. Classification of angular measurement according to the tested systems does not reflect the patient's perspective; it limits the precision of the measurement and adds little value to the measurement itself. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Treatment options and outcome after bony avulsion of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon: a review of 29 cases.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this retrospective review was to evaluate the functional and esthetic outcomes in patients with non- or minimally (<2 mm), and severely (>2 mm) displaced bony avulsions of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2010, 29 patients with a bony avulsion of the FDP tendon were treated. The displacement magnitude of the avulsed fragment determined, whether conservative or surgical treatment was performed. Persisting functional deficit, radiological findings, remaining disabilities using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, as well as treatment-related deformities and complications were evaluated retrospectively and at a mean follow-up of 7 years. RESULTS: In 16 patients, conservative therapy by initial static splinting due to a fragment displacement of <2 mm was conducted. These patients reported no functional impairment at follow-up. In 13 cases, major displacement (>2 mm) of the bony fragment led to an open reconstruction of the avulsion injury either by screw fixation or a Lengemann pull-out wire. In a majority, an extension deficit in the DIP joint and a decrease of tip pinch strength by 25% was present at follow-up. In five patients, peri- or short-term postoperative complications occurred and in five, a nail deformity remained. DASH score revealed satisfying results after both therapeutic approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment in non- or minimally displaced avulsions leads to satisfying functional results. Patients receiving surgery after major fragment displacement need to be aware of a possible impaired ROM at the DIP joint. The use of the Lengemann pull-out wire may place patients at an increased complication risk and frequently induces nail deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.

Early Passive Movement in flexor tendon injuries of the hand.

INTRODUCTION: Flexor tendon injuries are underestimated considering their anatomical function in the hand. According to the publications of Kleinert, Verdan and Kessler, primary suturing of the flexor tendon combined with immediate postoperative physiotherapy in terms of "Early Passive Movement" became the standard form of therapy following acute flexor tendon injuries of the hand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a study between 2007 and 2009, a total of 115 flexor tendon injuries were analysed retrospectively. All patients were treated using a two-strand repair technique according to Zechner. They received physiotherapy from the first postoperative day according to the Viennese flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol. For statistical purposes, the factors: age, gender, range of motion (ROM), follow up interval, affected flexor tendon and zone were analysed. The time between injury and surgery was also determined, classified into groups and included in the study. On the basis of the range of motion AROM, the Buck-Gramcko and modified Strickland Score was calculated. RESULTS: The mean follow-up interval was 7 months. Using the Buck-Gramcko and Strickland Score an "excellent" overall result was achieved. Complications occurred in 3.5 %, one secondary rupture (0.9 %), two tendon adhaesions requiring tenolysis (1.7 %) and one case of infection (0.9 %). The time interval between injury and operation, gender, affected zone, flexor tendon and affected finger nerve had no influence on the Buck-Gramcko and Strickland Score. CONCLUSIONS: Using Zechner's core suture technique as the primary treatment, combined with immediate postoperative physiotherapy in terms of "Early Passive Movement" according to the Viennese flexor tendon rehabilitation programme, an excellent clinical outcome and low complication rate was acchieved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV: case series.

Silicone Foley's catheter as an effective alternative to Hunter's rod in staged flexor tendon reconstruction of the hand.

CONTEXT: Staged flexor tendon reconstruction is most suitable treatment method for extensive zone II tendon injuries. The Hunter's rod used in this procedure is costly and not easily available, which adds to the miseries of both patients as well as treating surgeon. AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of staged zone II flexor tendon repair using silicone Foley's catheter as a cheaper and readily available alternative to Hunter's rod. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy digits in 35 patients were treated by the staged flexor tendon reconstruction using silicone Foley's catheter in place of Hunter's rod, and the patients were followed for an average period of 18 months. Early controlled motion exercise protocol was instituted in all cases. RESULTS: As per the Strickland scale, total active motion obtained was excellent in 70%, good in 20%, fair in 7.1% and poor in 2.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Silicone Foley's catheter is cheaper, easily available and an effective alternative to Hunter's rod in staged flexor tendon reconstruction procedure, yielding high rates of excellent and good results with fewer complications.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Different Immobilized Finger Positions After Repair of Flexor Tendon Rupture in Zones I and II: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial With Historical Control Group.

Introduction The position of finger immobilization after flexor tendon rupture repair is changed to the extended position to prevent flexion contracture of the interphalangeal (IP) joint. However, in Strickland's assessment, We believe that a reduction in TAF (total active flexion) affects the outcome and that extension fixation is not necessarily the primary focus. For example, there are management methods that swap the fixed position between day and night. It is assumed that some effect is sought by placing the fingers in the flexed position. That is, the method of fixation is currently selected at individual facilities through twists and turns; however, the indications and criteria for selecting finger fixation positions are ambiguous, and they are apparently subject to the experience of therapists. This study aimed to characterize follow-up outcomes of flexion and extension fixation after zones I and II flexor tendon rupture repair. Methods This nonrandomized controlled trial with historical controls included 25 patients with flexor tendon ruptures of 30 fingers. The flexion fixation group consisted of 12 patients (n=16 fingers) and the extension fixation group consisted of 13 patients (n=14 fingers). The group with flexion fixation comprised patients who slept with their injured fingers in the flexed position (intervention group). The group with extension was retrospectively selected between April 2017 and March 2019, who slept with their injured finger in the extended position (historical control group). Strickland assessments of the range of motion (ROM) of each joint at the conclusion of hand therapy, the ratio of total active motion of the repaired, to the healthy finger (%TAF), and IP joint extension limitation angles were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Ratios of excellent and good ratings based on the Strickland assessment were compared using Fisher exact tests. Result The results of the Strickland assessment showed excellent or good outcomes for 22 (73%) of 30 fingers, which was in line with our previous findings. Strickland ratings of excellent were achieved in seven (44%) of 16 fingers and four (28%) of 14 fingers in the groups with flexion and extension fixation, respectively. The outcomes for two (22%) of 16 fingers and seven (78%) of 14 fingers in the groups with flexion and extension fixation were, respectively, rated as good. The proportion of patients rated as excellent was significantly higher in the group with flexion than extension fixation (p=0.040). The %TAF and the active flexion angle of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint were higher in the group with flexion than extension fixation (p=0008 and p=0.025, respectively). Furthermore, the total angle of the IP joint limit of extension did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion Flexion fixation after flexor tendon rupture achieved an excellent Strickland rating and was more effective than extension fixation, especially in terms of the active flexion ROM of the DIP joint. Flexion fixation might be an alternative to extension fixation because the range of flexion should be greater and might provide a range of finger extension motion equivalent to that of extension fixation.

Principles for Achieving Predictable Outcomes in Flexor Tendon Repair.

Flexor tendon injuries require surgical repair. Early repair is optimal, but staged repair may be indicated for delayed presentations. Zone II flexor tendon injuries are the most difficult to achieve acceptable outcomes and require special attention for appropriate repair. Surgical techniques to repair flexor tendons have evolved over the past several decades and principles include core strand repair using at least a 4 strand technique, epitendinous suture to add strength and gliding properties, and pulley venting. Early postoperative active range of motion within the first 3 to 5 days of surgery is essential for optimizing outcomes.

Functional outcome of flexor tendon repair of the hand at Zone 5 and post operative early mobilization of the fingers.

UNLABELLED: Objective : There are few reports on outcome following flexor tendon repair of the hand in zone 5. We hypothesized that early mobilization of the fingers is possible if the suture site of repaired tendon is strong enough. The aim of this study was to assess the results of flexor tendon repair in this zone using modified Kessler method reinforced by peripheral running suture and a post operative early active and passive mobilization of the fingers. METHODOLOGY: This prospective study was carried out between April 2006 and Feb 2010, and 171 digits flexor tendons cut in 42 patients were repaired by modified Kessler technique reinforced by running peripheral suture. Early active mobilization and gentle passive motion of the fingers was allowed in a dorsal wrist splint the day after surgery. Wrist Immobilization was performed for one month. Function of the tendons was assessed by Buck-Gramcko score at nine month follow up. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 25.4 years (range 17-46 y). Twenty nine flexor policis longus, 77 flexor digitorum superficialis and 65 flexor digitorum profundus tendons of digits were repaired. Middle and index fingers were most commonly involved. Median and ulnar nerve repair was done in 17 and 12 cases respectively. Good to excellent results were seen in of 79.34% of FPL and 74.65% of other finger flexors. One case of FPL rupture was seen. Tenolysis of FDS was performed in one case. Recovery in thenar muscle function was good, fair and poor in 5, 2 and 10 cases after median nerve repair, while all 12 patients with ulnar nerve lesion showed some degrees of clawing of 4(th) and 5(th) fingers. Conclusion : Most patients following flexor tendon repair at zone 5 obtained good results. Early motion of the fingers seems to improve outcome in these patients. Concomitant nerve cut in particular of ulnar nerve were associated with a high rate of poor results.

Treatment of unfavourable results of flexor tendon surgery: Ruptured repairs, tethered repairs and pulley incompetence.

As primary repair of divided flexor tendons becomes more common, secondary tendon surgery becomes largely that of the complications of primary repair, namely ruptured and adherent repairs. These occur with an incidence of each in most reported series world-wide of around 5%, with these problems having changed little in the last two decades, despite strengthening our suture repairs. Where the primary referral service is less well-developed, and as a more occasional occurrence where primary treatment is the routine, the surgeon faces different problems. Patients arrive at a hand unit variable, but longer, times after the primary insult, having had no, or bad, previous treatment. Sometimes the situation is the same, viz. an extended finger with no active flexion, but now no longer amenable to primary repair. Frequently, it is much more complex as a result of injuries to the other tissues of the digit and, also, as a result of the unaided healing process within the digit in the presence of an inactive flexor system. We present our experience in dealing with ruptured repairs, tethered repairs and pulley incompetence.

Strength, bulk and surgery time of ex situ versus in situ flexor tendon repair in a cadaveric model.

The purpose of this study was to compare strength, bulk and time of repair of human cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons repaired in situ versus ex situ. Ninety-six human cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons were transected 5 mm distal to the A2-pulley and randomized to 2-strand, 4-strand or 6-strand repairs. We found no significant differences in repair strength between in situ and ex situ repairs, but repair strength increased with increasing number of strands. The cross-sectional area of the repair was not significantly related to the number of strands, but 4- and 6-strand in situ repairs were bulkier than ex situ repairs. In situ repair took longer, and repair time increased with increasing number of strands. We suggest that cadaveric studies of flexor tendon repair should be performed in situ in order to better mimic the clinical reality of tissue handling and repair bulkiness.

Outcomes of Primary Flexor Tendon Repairs in Zones 2 and 3: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: The aims of this retrospective cohort study were to present outcomes of zone 2 and 3 primary flexor tendon repairs and to evaluate how clinical outcomes change over time within and between zones of injury at weeks 6, 13, and 26. Methods: Data were retrieved from a multicenter flexor tendon cohort registry from 2014 to 2021. The inclusion criteria were: (1) adult patients after primary flexor tendon surgery in zone 2 or 3, (2) flexor digitorum profundus laceration of >50%, (3) 4-6 multistrand flexor digitorum profundus core suture, and (4) early active motion protocol. The primary outcome was the range of motion. Secondary outcomes were strength, patient satisfaction on an 11-point Likert scale, and self-reported physical function measured with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire 6, 13, and 26 weeks after surgery. Results: We evaluated 33 patients after 39 tendon repairs in zone 3 and 174 repairs in zone 2 of 163 patients. Range of motion significantly improved over time in both zones (P < .001 to .01). Between-group range of motion differences were nonsignificant except for week 26 (P < .001) for the zone 3 group. Hand strength significantly improved in both zones over time (P < .001 to .01), while between-zone strength differences were statistically nonsignificant (P = .37 to .93). Patient satisfaction was generally good to high (mean 6.8 to 8.0 points) with significant within-group changes in both zones (P < .001). There were no relevant between-zone differences in Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores at any time point. Conclusions: Patients had significantly improved clinical outcomes in both zones. The zone of injury significantly affected the total active motion scores at the final assessment after 26 weeks for the zone 3 injuries. For the secondary outcomes hand strength, patient satisfaction, and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, we discovered no significant between-group differences. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Comparing the outcomes of fingertip-to-palm and fingertip-to-forearm two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction for isolated flexor digitorum profundus tendon injuries.

Flexor tendon injuries of the hand have devastating consequences when primary tendon repair fails or left untreated in the first place. Flexor tendon reconstruction is a substantial treatment option to obtain functional digit. In this study, we aimed to compare the functional outcomes and technical feasibility of fingertip-to-palm and fingertip-to-forearm tendon reconstruction methods. Thirty-five patients were divided into two groups according to the proximal attachment site of the free tendon grafts. Group I consisted of 18 patients whose tendon grafts were placed from fingertip-to-palm (zone III). Group II consisted of 17 patients whose tendon grafts were placed from fingertip-to-forearm (zone V). The mean of 39.6 months (range, 6-52 months) of follow-up with complete clinical data were obtained for all the cases. The mean length of the tendon grafts used in group I and group II was 9.7 ± 1.4 cm and 15.9 ± 1.2 cm, respectively. Significantly shorter tendon grafts were needed in group I (p < 0.001). Both mean DASH score and mean Michigan score were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001), but there was no significant difference between two groups based on postoperative DASH score (p = 0.112) and Michigan score (p = 0.151). No statistically significant difference was observed between two groups in terms of Strickland's scores (p = 0.868). This study demonstrates that comparable results can be obtained with fingertip-to-palm and fingertip-to-forearm staged tendon reconstructions. Fingertip-to-palm tendon reconstruction seems to be more advantageous when multiple flexor tendon injuries aimed to be reconstructed, in which requirement of tendon graft can be fulfilled with less donor site morbidity.Abbreviations: DASH: disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand.

Patients' experiences of flexor tendon rehabilitation in relation to adherence: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: To explore patients' experiences of early active motion flexor tendon rehabilitation in relation to adherence to restrictions and outcome of rehabilitation. METHOD: Seventeen patients with a flexor tendon injury in one or several fingers participated in qualitative interviews performed between 74 and 111 days after surgery. Data were analysed using directed content analysis with the Health Belief Model (HBM) as a theoretical framework. RESULTS: Perceived severity of hand function and susceptibility to loss of hand function affected the participants' behaviour. A higher perceived threat increased motivation to exercise and be cautious in activities. During rehabilitation, the perceived benefits or efficacy of doing exercise and following restrictions were compared to the cost of doing so, leading to adherence or non-adherence behaviour. Perceived self-efficacy was affected by previous knowledge and varied through the rehabilitation period. External factors and interaction with therapists influenced the perception of the severity of the injury and the cost and benefits of adhering to rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Patient's perception of the injury, the effectiveness of exercises, context and social support to manage daily life affected adherence to restriction, motivation and commitment to rehabilitation. The HBM as a theoretical framework can be beneficial for understanding factors that influence patients' adherence.Implications for RehabilitationInformation regarding the injury and consequences for the patient should be presented at different time points and in different ways, tailored to the patient.It' is important to aid patients to perceive the small gradual improvements in hand function to create motivation to adhere to exercise.Strategies to reduce the cost of adherence in terms of managing everyday life should be addressed by individually based strategies.Instructions regarding exercise and restrictions should be less complex and consider the patient's individual needs.

Rehabilitation following flexor tendon injury in Zone 2: a randomized controlled study.

The aim of this study was to compare an early active motion (EAM) regimen to a modified Kleinert passive motion therapy in Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries with regards to range of motion (ROM), grip strength and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Seventy-two patients were included. At 3 months postoperatively, we found no difference in total active motion (TAM) between the EAM and the Kleinert groups (median 195.5°, range 115°-273° versus median 191.5°, range 113°-260°), but a significantly better grip strength (median 76%, range 44%-99% versus median 54%, range 19%-101%; p < 0.0005) in the EAM group. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score as well as patient-reported weakness, cold intolerance and problems in daily activities also favoured the EAM group. At 12 months postoperatively, there was no difference in TAM, grip strength or any of the PROMs used. We conclude that EAM leads to a quicker recovery in terms of grip strength and PROMs, but that both regimens lead to similar results at 12 months.Level of evidence: I.

Comparison the Range of Motion Following Early Versus Late Active Mobilization after Repairing Surgery on Flexor Tendon Injury in the Zone II: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Early or delayed mobilization of limb after flexor tendon rupture repairing has an effect on postoperative outcomes, however it is not yet clear whether early or late organ mobilization leads to more likelihood of recovery. We aimed to assess the effects of early and late active limb mobilization through rehabilitation after surgery on the range of motion and hand recovery. Methods: This randomized clinical study was performed in Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran in 2022 on 80 patients with flexor tendon damage in the zone II, who underwent reconstructive surgery of superficial and deep tendons. Patients were randomly (using random number table) divided into two groups that for one group, rehabilitation was done early (starting after three days, n = 53) and for the other group, rehabilitation was done late (starting after three weeks, n = 27). The patients were examined postoperatively and following occupational therapy and the range of motion of their involved joints was calculated. Results: The means PIP extension Lag, PIP active flexion, DIP extension Lag, DIP active flexion and total active motion were all significantly higher in those patients planned for early mobilization as compared to those who considered for late mobilization(P=0.031). Such a significant difference was also revealed adjusting baseline parameters. Conclusion: Compared to the delayed start of hand flexor tendon mobility, the early start of these activities is associated with a much greater improvement in the movement function of this tendon.

Closed Traumatic Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Injury of the Long Finger - A Case Report.

Closed rupture of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon causes loss of flexion at the distal interphalangeal joint. Following trauma, these are known to present as avulsion fractures (Jersey finger) commonly in ring fingers. Traumatic tendon ruptures at the other flexor zones are seldom noted and are often missed. In this report, we present a rare case of closed traumatic tendon rupture of the long finger FDP at zone 2. Though it was missed initially, was confirmed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and underwent successful reconstruction using an ipsilateral palmaris longus graft. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Surgical Considerations for Flexor Tendon Repair: Timing and Choice of Repair Technique and Rehabilitation.

Flexor tendon injuries are common and occur mostly due to penetrating trauma. Surgical repair is required for complete tendon lacerations, and many techniques exist. This article reviews the principles of tendon structure, function, healing, and anatomy. Repair techniques are discussed in detail for each flexor tendon zone. Postoperative rehabilitation greatly influences outcomes, and several protocols are described.

Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) for Flexor Tendon Repairs as Change in Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced many changes. In our unit, there was a significant shift from traditional anesthesia (TA) which included general or regional anesthesia, to Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) for the treatment of flexor tendon injuries. Zones I and II injuries have always been a challenge. The primary aim of this study is to compare the 12-week range of motion (ROM) flexor tendon repair outcomes between the TA group and wide-awake (WA) group patients. The secondary aim is to compare the complications and the follow-up rate between the two groups. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary finger flexor tendon repair in zone I or II without tendon graft for closed avulsions or open lacerations between April 2020 and March 2021 were included in the study. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record demographics, follow-up, ROM outcomes and complications. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with 49 injured fingers were in the WA group, and 24 patients with 37 injured fingers were in the TA group. A complete follow-up with 12-week ROM outcomes was available for 15 patients with 16 injured fingers in the WA group and nine patients with 13 injured fingers in the TA group. Excellent to good outcomes in the WA group were reported in 56% of the cases versus 31% in the TA group, although the difference was not statistically significant. There were similar complications in both groups, with an overall rupture rate of 11.6%, a tenolysis rate of 3.5% and a reoperation rate of 9.3%. Complete 12-week follow-up was completed by 41% of patients overall after taking tendon ruptures into account. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies comparing zones I and II flexor tendon ROM outcomes between WA anesthesia and TA. Overall, there was a trend toward superior ROM outcomes in the WA group, with similar complication rates in both groups. The difference between ROM outcomes was not statistically significant and the small sample size undermined the strength of the study. To provide stronger evidence, better-designed prospective studies are suggested that would compare WA techniques with TA techniques.