Epigenetic lockdown of CDKN1A (p21) and CDKN2A (p16) characterises the neoplastic spindle cell component of giant cell tumours of bone.

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) comprises the eponymous osteoclastic multinucleated giant cells eliciting bone lysis, an H3F3A-mutated neoplastic mononucleated fibroblast-like cell population, and H3F3A wild-type mononucleated stromal cells. In this study, we characterised four new cell lines from GCTB. Furthermore, we compared the genome-wide DNA methylation profile of 13 such tumours and three further cell lines with giant cell-rich lesions comprising three H3F3B-mutated chondroblastomas, three USP6-rearranged aneurysmal bone cysts, three non-ossifying fibromas, two hyperparathyroidism-associated brown tumours as well as mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts. In an unsupervised analysis, we delineated GCTB and chondroblastomas from the other analysed tumour entities. Using comparative methylation analysis, we demonstrated that the methylation pattern of the cell lines approximately equals that of H3F3A-mutated stromal cells in tissue. These patterns more resemble that of osteoblasts than that of mesenchymal stem cells, which argues for the osteoblast as the cell of origin of giant cell tumours of bone. Using enrichment analysis, we detected distinct hypermethylated clusters containing histone and collagen genes as well as target genes of the tumour suppressor p53. We found that the promotor regions of CDKN1A, CDKN2A, and IGFBP3 are methylated more strongly in GCTB than in the other giant cell-containing lesions, mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts (p < 0.001). This hypermethylation correlates with the lower gene expression at the mRNA level for these three genes in the cell lines, the lack of p16 and p21 in these cell lines, and the lower expression of p16 and p21 in GCTB. Overall, our analysis reveals characteristic DNA methylation patterns of giant cell tumours of bone and chondroblastomas and shows that cell lines of giant cell tumours of bone are a valid model for further analysis of H3F3A-mutated tumour cells. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Outcome of re-operation for local recurrence following pre-operative denosumab administration and curettage for giant cell tumour of bone with difficult joint preservation.

PURPOSE: Denosumab enables joint-sparing surgery (curettage) and surgical downstaging in patients with giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), where joint preservation is not possible. However, denosumab treatment causes osteosclerosis of the lesion, making it difficult to curet the lesion, leaving the tumour behind, and increasing the local recurrence rate. We performed a three-centre retrospective study to investigate the postoperative local re-recurrence rate, joint preservation status, and functional outcomes of locally recurrent lesions after preoperative denosumab treatment and curettage in patients with difficult joint preservation. METHODS: We included 38 of 142 patients with primary GCTB of the extremities who underwent preoperative denosumab and curettage between 2009 and 2021 with local recurrence. Preoperative denosumab was indicated in patients with minimal residual periarticular and subchondral bones, large extraosseous lesions (Campanacci stage 3), and pathological fractures that made joint preservation difficult. RESULTS: Local re-recurrence occurred in 6 (15.8%) of the 38 patients. In 29 patients who underwent re-curettage, local re-recurrence occurred in six patients (20.7%); however, in nine patients who underwent en bloc resection, no local re-recurrence was observed. The joint preservation rate was 63.2% (24 of 38 patients), with a median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 28 (interquartile range: 26.8-29.0). The median follow-up period after surgery for local recurrence was 63.5 months (interquartile range: 42.5-82.4). CONCLUSION: Since the local re-recurrence rate after re-curettage for local recurrence was low, and the joint preservation rate and affected limb function were good, preoperative denosumab administration may be considered in patients who require downstaging to maintain good limb function (joint preservation).

Malignant giant cell tumour of bone: a review of clinical, pathological and imaging features.

Giant cell tu mour accounts for up to 5% of all bone tumours and malignant giant cell tumour arises in < 10% of cases, representing sarcomatous transformation. Primary malignant giant cell tumour of bone occurs when sarcomatous tissue is observed within conventional giant cell tumour histologically on initial presentation. Secondary malignant giant cell tumour of bone occurs in a region of previously treated giant cell tumour, with most cases arising due to prior radiotherapy. Malignancy in giant cell tumour of bone does not have any unique clinical or imaging features compared to conventional aggressive disease. Historically, malignant giant cell tumour of bone has a poor prognosis which is worse in cases of secondary malignancy. This article aims to present the clinical, pathological and imaging features of MGCTB based on a review of the literature and illustrated by examples from our experience.

Clinicopathologic and molecular features of denosumab-treated giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB): Analysis of 21 cases.

GCTB is an osteolytic, locally-aggressive, rarely-metastasizing tumour, characterized by abundance of osteoclast-like giant cells, induced by neoplastic mononuclear cells expressing high-levels of the receptor activator of nuclear factor Kappa-B ligand (RANKL), a mediator of osteoclast activation. Although the mainstay of treatment is complete tumour removal with preservation of bone, therapy with denosumab, an inhibitor of RANKL, has been introduced for selected cases. OBJECTIVES: Denosumab-treated GCTB (DT-GCTB) was reported to show a wide spectrum of histological changes such as depletion of osteoclast-like giant cells and intralesional bone deposition, which may lead to diagnostic difficulties. We investigated clinicopathologic and molecular features of DT-GCTB, matched with pre-therapy samples. PARTICIPANTS: 21 cases were included (13 females, 8 males), aged 15 to 64 (median, 30 years). RESULTS: DT-GCTB showed development of sclerotic neocortex and varying degrees of osteosclerosis radiographically. Marked depletion of giant cells, different degree of ossification, fibrosis, and proliferation of mononuclear cells was observed. Staining for H3.3G34W was positive in mononuclear cells in 19 cases (90.5%), while one negative case was positive for H3.3G34V. H3F3A G34W mutation was confirmed in 17 of 19 cases (89.5%), corresponding to nuclear staining with H3.3 G34W antibody. G34L mutation was detected in one G34W negative case, in which H3.3 G34V nuclear positive staining was observed, possibly due to cross-reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Post-therapy tumours still exhibit a similar mutation profile, while significantly differing from classic GCTB morphologically. Correlation with history of denosumab administration, awareness of features of DT-GCTB, IHC and molecular studies for histone H3 mutations are important in its assessment.

Computerised tomography features of giant cell tumour of the knee are associated with local recurrence after extended curettage.

BACKGROUND: Extended curettage has increasingly become the preferred treatment for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), but the high recurrence rate after curettage poses a major challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Computed tomography (CT) is valuable in the evaluation of GCTB. Our aim was to identify specific features of GCTB around the knee in pre-operative CT images that might have prognostic value for local recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 124 patients with primary GCTB around the knee who underwent extended curettage from 2010 through 2019. We collected demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data along with several CT-derived tumour characteristics. CT-derived tumor characteristics included tumour size, the distance between the tumour edge and articular surface (DTA), and destruction of posterior cortical bone (DPC). Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to select which variables to enter into multivariate logistic regression models and to determine significant factors affecting recurrence. RESULTS: The total recurrence rate was 21.0% (26/124), and the average follow-up time was 69.5 ± 31.2 months (24-127 months). Age, DTA (< 2 mm), and DPC were significantly related to recurrence, as determined by multivariate logistic regression. The C-index of the final model was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71 to 0.88), representing a good model for predicting recurrence. CONCLUSION: Identifying certain features of GCTB around the knee on CT has prognostic value for patients treated with extended curettage. A three-factor model predicts tumour recurrence well after extended curettage.

Diagnostic Utility of Genetic and Immunohistochemical H3-3A Mutation Analysis in Giant Cell Tumour of Bone.

To validate the reliability and implementation of an objective diagnostic method for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). H3-3A gene mutation testing was performed using two different methods, Sanger sequencing and immunohistochemical (IHC) assays. A total of 214 patients, including 120 with GCTB and 94 with other giant cell-rich bone lesions, participated in the study. Sanger sequencing and IHC with anti-histone H3.3 G34W and G34V antibodies were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, which were previously decalcified in EDTA if needed. The sensitivity and specificity of the molecular method was 100% (95% CI: 96.97-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 96.15-100%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC was 94.32% (95% CI: 87.24-98.13%) and 100% (95% CI: 93.94-100.0%), respectively. P.G35 mutations were discovered in 2/9 (22.2%) secondary malignant GCTBs and 9/13 (69.2%) GCTB after denosumab treatment. We confirmed in a large series of patients that evaluation of H3-3A mutational status using direct sequencing is a reliable tool for diagnosing GCTB, and it should be incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm. Additionally, we discovered IHC can be used as a screening tool. Proper tissue processing and decalcification are necessary. The presence of the H3-3A mutation did not exclude malignant GCTB. Denosumab did not eradicate the neoplastic cell population of GCTB.

Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: A Review of Literature and the Experience of a Referral Centre.

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a benign, locally aggressive primary bone neoplasm that represents 5% of all bone tumours. The principal treatment approach is surgery. Although generally GCTB is considered only a locally aggressive disease, it can metastasise, and lung metastases occur in 1-9% of patients. To date, only the use of denosumab has been approved as medical treatment for GCTB. Even more rarely, GCTB undergoes sarcomatous transformation into a malignant tumour (4% of all GCTB), but history of this malignant transformation is unclear and unpredictable. Considering the rarity of the event, the data in the literature are few. In this review, we summarise published data of GCTB malignant transformation and we analyse three cases of malignant transformation of GCTB, evaluating histopathology, genetics, and radiological aspects. Despite the rarity of this event, we conclude that a strict follow up is recommended to detect early malignant transformation.

Aberrant sphingomyelin 31P-NMR signatures in giant cell tumour of bone.

An understanding of the biochemistry of the giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) provides an opportunity for the development of prognostic markers and identification of therapeutic targets. Based on metabolomic analysis, we proposed glycerophospholipid metabolism as the altered pathway in GCTB., The objective of this study was to identify these altered metabolites. Using phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-NMR), sphingomyelin was determined to be the most dysregulated phospholipid in tissue samples from six patients with GCTB. Enzymes related to its biosynthesis and hydrolysis were examined using immunodetection techniques. High expression of sphingomyelin synthases 1 and 2, but low expression of neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2) was found in GCTB tissues compared to non-neoplastic bone tissues. Sphingomyelin/ceramide biosynthesis is dysregulated in GCTB due to alterations in the expression of SMS1, SMS2, and nSMase2.

H3F3A-mutated giant cell tumour of bone without giant cells-clinical presentation, radiology and histology of three cases.

AIMS: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is histologically defined as a lesion containing reactive giant cells and a neoplastic mononuclear cell population; in up to 92% of cases, GCTB is characterised by a specific mutation of the histone gene H3F3A. The cellular composition ranges from giant-cell-rich to giant-cell-poor. The diagnosis of GCTB can be challenging, and several other lesions need to be excluded, e.g. aneurysmal bone cysts, non-ossifying fibromas, chondroblastomas, brown tumours, and giant-cell-rich osteosarcomas. Our aim was to analyse the clinical history, imaging, molecular pathology and histology of three H3F3A-mutated bone tumours without detectable giant cells. None of the patients received denosumab therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Diagnostic material was obtained by curettage or resection and/or biopsy. Common histomorphological features of all three reported lesions were fibrocytic, oval cells in a background of osteoid and an absence of multinuclear giant cells as confirmed with CD68 immunohistochemistry. We used immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing to demonstrate positivity for the H3.3 p.G34W mutation. Differential diagnoses were systematically excluded on the basis of histomorphology, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in-situ hybridisation. The imaging (radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) for all three cases is presented and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that these GCTBs without giant cells expand one end of the heterogeneous range of GCTB. Because of the lack of giant cells, correct diagnosis of GCTB is challenging or even impossible on histological grounds alone. In these cases, detection of the characteristic H3F3A mutation (G34W-specific antibody RM263 or sequencing) is extremely helpful for diagnosing those lesions without giant cells as giant cell tumours of bone.

The use of denosumab in the setting of acute pathological fracture through giant cell tumour of bone.

BACKGROUND: Denosumab (XgevaTM) is a fully human antibody to RANK-Ligand, an important signal mediator in the pathogenesis of giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). The use of denosumab in the treatment of GCTB has changed the way in which these tumours are managed over the past years. CASE PRESENTATION: Described is the case of an acute fracture through a GCTB of the distal radius of a fit and well 32-year-old, non-smoking, female patient following a simple fall onto her outstretched, dominant hand. The aim was to enable joint sparing management for the patient, as opposed to an acute fusion procedure of the carpus. The patient underwent percutaneous k-wire fixation with application of plaster and immediate commencement with denosumab to halt the activity of the GCTB. Bone healing was rapid; plaster and k-wires were removed after 6 weeks. At 6 months denosumab, was ceased and an open curettage and grafting procedure of the tumour bed was undertaken (using MIIG X3, Wright Medical, aqueous calcium sulphate as graft material). CONCLUSIONS: The use of denosumab in the acute setting of pathological fracture through giant cell tumour of bone allowing joint salvage has not been previously described. The treatment was well tolerated and functional outcomes are excellent, with very promising 4-year follow-up. This novel approach may allow for more joint sparing strategies in the future for other patients in this difficult situation. Further cases will need to be gathered to establish this technique as a suitable treatment pathway.

Radiological findings of denosumab treatment for giant cell tumours of bone.

Giant cell tumours of bone (GCTB) are benign giant cell-rich tumours typically occurring in the epi-metaphysis of skeletally mature patients. Despite their benign classification, GCTB may be locally aggressive with local recurrence as a challenging issue. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits osteolysis via the RANK-RANK ligand pathway. There is currently no consensus on optimal treatment duration or imaging modality for monitoring patients on denosumab therapy. This review illustrates the radiological findings of GCTB on denosumab treatment seen on plain radiographs, CT, MRI, PET-CT and DEXA, with reference to the current literature. Recognizing imaging features indicative of a positive response to denosumab is important for therapeutic decision-making. Imaging findings with respect to duration of denosumab treatment, tumour upregulation during treatment, tumour recurrence and malignant transformation are discussed. The development of a sclerotic neocortex and varying degrees of matrix osteosclerosis are seen on plain radiographs. Reconstitution of subarticular bone and articular surface irregularity are optimally evaluated on CT which can also quantify tumour density. MRI demonstrates heterogeneous low signal matrix and is useful to assess decrease in size of cystic and/or soft tissue components of GCTB. A fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive MR sequence is important to detect tumour reactivation. Reduction in 18F-FDG-PET avidity represents an early sensitive sign of response to denosumab treatment. Regardless of imaging modality, close follow-up in a specialist centre and careful evaluation of nonresponders is necessary as local recurrence after cessation of denosumab treatment and malignant transformation of GCTB have been described.

Curettage as first surgery for bone giant cell tumor : adequate surgery is more important than oncology training or surgical management by high volume specialized teams.

We reviewed the files of 203 patients with extremities GCTB treated with curettage as first surgery from 1990 to 2013. Median follow-up was 84.2 months. We evaluated whether the years of practice and training in orthopaedic oncology are associated with local recurrences, function and complications after curettage as first surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). Local recurrences were not significantly different between orthopaedic oncology trained and non-trained orthopaedic surgeons and between orthopaedic surgeons with < 10 years and ≥ 10 years of practice. Function was not significantly different between orthopaedic oncology trained and non-trained surgeons and between orthopaedic surgeons with < 10 years and ≥ 10 years of practice. The only important univariate and multivariate predictor for local recurrence was PMMA adjuvant. Complications were not significantly different between orthopaedic oncology trained and non-trained orthopaedic surgeons and between orthopaedic surgeons with < 10 years and ≥ 10 years of practice. Curettage may be effectively performed as first surgery for GCTB by early-career (< 10 years of practice) non-trained orthopaedic oncology orthopaedic surgeons. PMMA adjuvant is recommended after appropriate curettage.

Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases from bone giant cell tumour.

PURPOSE: There are conflicting reports on the effect of denosumab on lung metastases in patients with giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone. To address these reports, we performed this study to determine if denosumab prevents lung metastasis and to evaluate univariate and multivariate predictors for lung metastases in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 381 GCT patients with surgery alone and 30 GCT patients with surgery and denosumab administration. The median follow-up was 85.2 months (IQR, 54.2-124.4 months). We evaluated lung metastases and local recurrences, univariate and multivariate predictors for lung metastases, response, and adverse events of denosumab administration. RESULTS: The occurrence of lung metastases was similar (surgery alone 4.7%, 18 patients; denosumab administration 3.3%, 1 patient); however, the occurrence of local recurrences was significantly higher in the patients with denosumab administration. Denosumab administration was not an important predictor for lung metastases; Campanacci stage and type of surgery were the only univariate predictors for lung metastases, and type of surgery and local recurrence were the only multivariate predictors for lung metastases. Histology showed viable tumour in all tumor specimens of the patients with denosumab administration. CONCLUSION: Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases in patients with bone GCT; the only important predictors for lung metastases in these patients are type of surgery and local recurrence. However, because the number of patients with lung metastases was small for a multivariate analysis, the possibility of denosumab's effect could not be completely eliminated.

Giant cell tumours of bone treated with denosumab: histological, immunohistochemical and H3F3A mutation analyses.

AIMS: Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), is a therapeutic agent for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). Although some studies have reported that denosumab shrinks tumours and induces bone formation, the actual effects of RANKL suppression on GCTB remain unclear. A mutation in the H3 histone family member 3A gene (H3F3A) was recently identified as a genetic signature for GCTB. The aim of this study was to investigate the histopathological features and H3F3A mutation status of GCTBs treated with denosumab. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine biopsy-diagnosed patients with GCTB, who underwent curettage after neoadjuvant denosumab therapy, were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry for NFATc1 (an osteoclast marker), RUNX2 (an osteoblast marker) and histone H3.3 G34W (G34W, a GCTB marker) was performed; furthermore, H3F3A mutation status was examined with direct sequencing. Before therapy, GCTBs comprised NFATc1+ and RUNX2+ cells. All cases were G34W+ and contained H3F3A mutations. After therapy, the osteoclast-like giant cells disappeared. Areas of slender spindle cell proliferation and reticular woven bone that were NFATc1- and RUNX2+ replaced the lesions in various proportions. However, all post-therapy lesions still contained many G34W+ cells and harboured H3F3A mutations. Immunofluorescence double staining revealed that RUNX2+ mononuclear cells coexpressed G34W in pre-therapy and post-therapy lesions. Two patients experienced radiologically detected local recurrence within 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab therapy effectively decreases the number of osteoclastic cells in GCTBs. However, the neoplastic cells with H3F3A mutation survive denosumab treatment and undergo dramatic histological changes in response to this agent.

Biology of Bone Sarcomas and New Therapeutic Developments.

Bone sarcomas are tumours belonging to the family of mesenchymal tumours and constitute a highly heterogeneous tumour group. The three main bone sarcomas are osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and chondrosarcoma each subdivided in diverse histological entities. They are clinically characterised by a relatively high morbidity and mortality, especially in children and adolescents. Although these tumours are histologically, molecularly and genetically heterogeneous, they share a common involvement of the local microenvironment in their pathogenesis. This review gives a brief overview of their specificities and summarises the main therapeutic advances in the field of bone sarcoma.

H3F3A mutation in giant cell tumour of the bone is detected by immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal antibody against the G34W mutated site of the histone H3.3 variant.

AIMS: Giant cell tumour of the bone (GCTB) is a neoplasm predominantly of long bones characterized by the H3F3A mutation G34W. Conventional diagnosis is challenged by the tumour's giant cell-rich morphology, which overlaps with other giant cell-containing lesions of the bone. Recently, a monoclonal antibody specific for the H3F3A mutation has been generated. Our aim was to test this antibody on a cohort of giant cell-containing lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the antibody for analysis of 22 H3F3A-mutated GCTB, including two patients with recurrences; for comparison we analysed a cohort of 36 H3F3A wild-type giant cell-rich lesions of the bone and soft tissue, containing one brown tumour, six aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC), six chondroblastomas, five non-ossifying-fibromas, two fibrous dysplasias, nine tenosynovial giant cell tumours, one giant cell-rich sarcoma and six osteosarcomas. Furthermore, among the 22 mutated cases, we included one GCTB with two recurrences and lung metastases; the patient was treated with the anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK) ligand denosumab. We show that all 22 H3F3A-mutated GCTB display strong nuclear H3.3 G34W staining in the neoplastic component, while the osteoclastic giant cells are negative. 36 H3F3A wild-type lesions are negative. The GCTB treated with denosumab revealed a reduction in the H3.3 G34W-positive tumour cells and a decrease in osteoclastic giant cells accompanied by matrix and osteoid formation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that positive H3.3 G34W staining is a specific and sensitive method for detection of H3F3A-mutated GCTB. Denosumab treatment leads to a pathomorphosis of the lesion characterized by matrix and osteoid producing H3.3 G34W-negative stromal cells.

A prospective study on predicting local recurrence of giant cell tumour of bone by evaluating preoperative imaging features of the tumour around the knee joint.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of medical imaging in predicting local recurrence of giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) by assessing the preoperative imaging features of GCTB around the knee. METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive GCTBs in the proximal tibia and distal femur treated with curettage were prospectively enrolled. Patients were grouped in terms of their imaging features on radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients were followed up for at least two years after surgery. The association between preoperative imaging features and local recurrence was investigated. Imaging features were retrospectively studied by correlation analysis. The differences between rates were tested by the Chi square and Fisher exact tests; independent factors were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Cystic change and adjacent soft tissue invasion were associated with a higher rate of local recurrence compared to the negative groups (P < 0.05). Cystic change was identified as an independent risk factor for local recurrence of GCTB (P < 0.05). Expansibility was correlated with the "soap bubble" sign and the fluid-fluid level (P < 0.05); the "soap bubble" sign was correlated with osteosclerosis and the fluid-fluid level (P < 0.05); cortical bone involvement was correlated with adjacent soft tissue invasion (P < 0.05); and cystic change was correlated with the fluid-fluid level (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Cystic change was an independent risk factor for local recurrence of GCTB. Adjacent soft tissue invasion might indirectly relate to local relapse. A cluster of association relationships between imaging features was revealed.

Prognosis of local recurrence in giant cell tumour of bone: what can we do?

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is classified as an intermediate tumour with rare metastasis, but is challenged by local recurrence. This review focuses on the role of radiological evaluation in terms of prognosis of local recurrence in GCTB. We hope to highlight the value of radiological evaluation by integrating studies on the impact of surgical treatments and non-surgical factors on local recurrence of GCTB and the current statuses of genetic and molecular prognostic factors of GCTB. Radiological evaluation can provide diverse information on tumours. As a non-invasive method, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is especially valuable for the diagnosis and evaluation of bone tumours due to its heightened sensitivity to soft tissue disease and multiplanar image acquisition. Imaging findings should be integrated with clinical characteristics, pathology and genetic and molecular prognostic factors to direct clinical approach and reduce the local recurrence of GCTB. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a multi-perspective evaluation system by which prognostic factors can be reliably determined. We further advocate more large-scale prospective studies. With the help of radiological evaluation, the clinic treatment of GCTB can be guided and local recurrence might be reduced; additionally, MR imaging can identify local recurrence of GCTB after surgical treatment in the early stage.

How safe and effective is denosumab for bone giant cell tumour?

Recent clinical studies have suggested that denosumab is associated with beneficial tumour response, surgical down-staging, and reduced surgical morbidity in patients with giant cell tumour of bone. However, these studies reported results of patients still on denosumab treatment, or patients after denosumab treatment but with a short follow-up. Other studies reported that the new osseous tumour matrix and thickened cortical bone that develop with denosumab treatment does not allow the surgeon to delineate the true extent of the tumour, and probably increases the risk for local recurrence. A study showed that cell proliferation is only diminished by denosumab; the cells continue to proliferate in vitro, albeit at a slower rate. More importantly, nine cases of malignant transformation of GCT during denosumab therapy without previous radiation exposure have been reported; inhibition of RANKL may increase the risk of new malignancies due to immunosuppression. With these concerns in mind, this article is an attempt to put essential information in one place, creating a comprehensive review that the curious reader would find interesting and informative.