Variants in ATRIP are associated with breast cancer susceptibility in the Polish population and UK Biobank.

Several breast cancer susceptibility genes have been discovered, but more are likely to exist. To identify additional breast cancer susceptibility genes, we used the founder population of Poland and performed whole-exome sequencing on 510 women with familial breast cancer and 308 control subjects. We identified a rare mutation in ATRIP (GenBank: NM_130384.3: c.1152_1155del [p.Gly385Ter]) in two women with breast cancer. At the validation phase, we found this variant in 42/16,085 unselected Polish breast cancer-affected individuals and in 11/9,285 control subjects (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.13-4.28, p = 0.02). By analyzing the sequence data of the UK Biobank study participants (450,000 individuals), we identified ATRIP loss-of-function variants among 13/15,643 breast cancer-affected individuals versus 40/157,943 control subjects (OR = 3.28, 95% CI = 1.76-6.14, p < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry and functional studies showed the ATRIP c.1152_1155del variant allele is weakly expressed compared to the wild-type allele, and truncated ATRIP fails to perform its normal function to prevent replicative stress. We showed that tumors of women with breast cancer who have a germline ATRIP mutation have loss of heterozygosity at the site of ATRIP mutation and genomic homologous recombination deficiency. ATRIP is a critical partner of ATR that binds to RPA coating single-stranded DNA at sites of stalled DNA replication forks. Proper activation of ATR-ATRIP elicits a DNA damage checkpoint crucial in regulating cellular responses to DNA replication stress. Based on our observations, we conclude ATRIP is a breast cancer susceptibility gene candidate linking DNA replication stress to breast cancer.

Discovering predisposing genes for hereditary breast cancer using deep learning.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy affecting Western women today. It is estimated that as many as 10% of BC cases can be attributed to germline variants. However, the genetic basis of the majority of familial BC cases has yet to be identified. Discovering predisposing genes contributing to familial BC is challenging due to their presumed rarity, low penetrance, and complex biological mechanisms. Here, we focused on an analysis of rare missense variants in a cohort of 12 families of Middle Eastern origins characterized by a high incidence of BC cases. We devised a novel, high-throughput, variant analysis pipeline adapted for family studies, which aims to analyze variants at the protein level by employing state-of-the-art machine learning models and three-dimensional protein structural analysis. Using our pipeline, we analyzed 1218 rare missense variants that are shared between affected family members and classified 80 genes as candidate pathogenic. Among these genes, we found significant functional enrichment in peroxisomal and mitochondrial biological pathways which segregated across seven families in the study and covered diverse ethnic groups. We present multiple evidence that peroxisomal and mitochondrial pathways play an important, yet underappreciated, role in both germline BC predisposition and BC survival.

Comprehensive splicing analysis of the alternatively spliced CHEK2 exons 8 and 10 reveals three enhancer/silencer-rich regions and 38 spliceogenic variants.

Splicing is controlled by a large set of regulatory elements (SREs) including splicing enhancers and silencers, which are involved in exon recognition. Variants at these motifs may dysregulate splicing and trigger loss-of-function transcripts associated with disease. Our goal here was to study the alternatively spliced exons 8 and 10 of the breast cancer susceptibility gene CHEK2. For this purpose, we used a previously published minigene with exons 6-10 that produced the expected minigene full-length transcript and replicated the naturally occurring events of exon 8 [Δ(E8)] and exon 10 [Δ(E10)] skipping. We then introduced 12 internal microdeletions of exons 8 and 10 by mutagenesis in order to map SRE-rich intervals by splicing assays in MCF-7 cells. We identified three minimal (10-, 11-, 15-nt) regions essential for exon recognition: c.863_877del [ex8, Δ(E8): 75%] and c.1073_1083del and c.1083_1092del [ex10, Δ(E10): 97% and 62%, respectively]. Then 87 variants found within these intervals were introduced into the wild-type minigene and tested functionally. Thirty-eight of them (44%) impaired splicing, four of which (c.883G>A, c.883G>T, c.884A>T, and c.1080G>T) induced negligible amounts (<5%) of the minigene full-length transcript. Another six variants (c.886G>A, c.886G>T, c.1075G>A, c.1075G>T, c.1076A>T, and c.1078G>T) showed significantly strong impacts (20-50% of the minigene full-length transcript). Thirty-three of the 38 spliceogenic variants were annotated as missense, three as nonsense, and two as synonymous, underlying the fact that any exonic change is capable of disrupting splicing. Moreover, c.883G>A, c.883G>T, and c.884A>T were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants according to ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology)-based criteria. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

PALB2-mutated human mammary cells display a broad spectrum of morphological and functional abnormalities induced by increased TGFß signaling.

Heterozygous mutations in any of three major genes, BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2, are associated with high-risk hereditary breast cancer susceptibility frequently seen as familial disease clustering. PALB2 is a key interaction partner and regulator of several vital cellular activities of BRCA1 and BRCA2, and is thus required for DNA damage repair and alleviation of replicative and oxidative stress. Little is however known about how PALB2-deficiency affects cell function beyond that, especially in the three-dimensional setting, and also about its role during early steps of malignancy development. To answer these questions, we have generated biologically relevant MCF10A mammary epithelial cell lines with mutations that are comparable to certain clinically important PALB2 defects. We show in a non-cancerous background how both mono- and biallelically PALB2-mutated cells exhibit gross spontaneous DNA damage and mitotic aberrations. Furthermore, PALB2-deficiency disturbs three-dimensional spheroid morphology, increases the migrational capacity and invasiveness of the cells, and broadly alters their transcriptome profiles. TGFß signaling and KRT14 expression are enhanced in PALB2-mutated cells and their inhibition and knock down, respectively, lead to partial restoration of cell functions. KRT14-positive cells are also more abundant with DNA damage than KRT14-negative cells. The obtained results indicate comprehensive cellular changes upon PALB2 mutations, even in the presence of half dosage of wild type PALB2 and demonstrate how PALB2 mutations may predispose their carriers to malignancy.

Structural implications of amyloidogenic rare variants Ser282Leu and Gln356Arg identified in h-BRCA1.

Preliminary studies have shown BRCA1 (170-1600) residues to be intrinsically disordered with unknown structural details. However, thousands of clinically reported variants have been identified in this central region of BRCA1. Therefore, we aimed to characterize h-BRCA1(260-553) to assess the structural basis for pathogenicity of two rare missense variants Ser282Leu, Gln356Arg identified from the Indian and Russian populations respectively. Small-angle X-ray scattering analysis revealed WT scores Rg -32 Å, Dmax -93 Å, and Rflex-51% which are partially disordered, whereas Ser282Leu variant displayed a higher degree of disorderedness and Gln356Arg was observed to be aggregated. WT protein also possesses an inherent propensity to undergo a disorder-to-order transition in the presence of cruciform DNA and 2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol (TFE). An increased alpha-helical pattern was observed with increasing concentration of TFE for the Gln356Arg mutant whereas Ser282Leu mutant showed significant differences only at the highest TFE concentration. Furthermore, higher thermal shift was observed for WT-DNA complex compared to the Gln356Arg and Ser282Leu protein-DNA complex. Moreover, mature amyloid-like fibrils were observed with 30 µM thioflavin T (ThT) at 37°C for Ser282Leu and Gln356Arg proteins while the WT protein exists in a protofibril state as observed by TEM. Gln356Arg formed higher-order aggregates with amyloidogenesis over time as monitored by ThT fluorescence. In addition, computational analyses confirmed larger conformational fluctuations for Ser282Leu and Gln356Arg mutants than for the WT. The global structural alterations caused by these variants provide a mechanistic approach for further classification of the variants of uncertain clinical significance in BRCA1 into amyloidogenic variants which may have a significant role in disease pathogenesis.

Characteristics of Chinese breast cancer patients with double heterozygosity for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline pathogenic variants.

PURPOSE: Despite of very rare, breast cancer patients with double heterozygosity (DH) variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been identified in other ethnic groups and seem to be associated with distinctive phenotypes. However, little is known about the frequency and clinical characteristics of Chinese breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 DH variants. METHODS: Four hundred and eleven unrelated patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs) were identified in a large series of unselected breast cancer patients. Another two siblings with metachronous bilateral breast cancer were referred for genetic counseling, after which BRCA1/2 DH variants were detected. RESULTS: Four unrelated breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 DH were identified in the cohort of 411 patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs, the frequency of BRCA1/2 DH was 0.97%. In total, six BRCA1/2 DH patients from five families were found in this study. In two families, the hereditary pattern of DH was speculated to have originated from both sides of the family. BRCA1/2 DH patients were more likely to have a family history of breast cancer than patients with a BRCA1 (100% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.004) or BRCA2 (100% vs. 29.6%, P = 0.004) single PV. BRCA1/2 DH patients were more likely to be triple-negative breast tumors than patients with single BRCA2 PVs (66.7% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.020), which was comparable to the findings in patients with single BRCA1 PVs (66.7% vs. 56.9%, P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: Chinese patients with BRCA1/2 DH exhibit a high percentage of family history of breast cancer. The tumor pathological features of BRCA1/2 DH carriers are similar to those of BRCA1 PV carriers.

Breast cancers in monoallelic MUTYH germline mutation carriers have clinicopathological features overlapping with those in BRCA1 germline mutation carriers.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients referred to genetic counseling often undergo genetic testing with broad panels that include both breast cancer susceptibility genes as well as genes more specific for extramammary sites. As a result, patients are often incidentally found to have germline mutations in genes that are not necessarily related to breast cancer risk. One such gene is MUTYH. To understand the role MUTYH may play in breast cancer, the clinicopathological features of patients with monoallelic MUTYH germline mutation and breast cancer were examined. METHODS: The clinicopathological characteristics of the breast cancers from patients with monoallelic MUTYH mutation were compared to breast cancer patients with other germline mutations in known breast cancer susceptibility genes, including ATM, BRCA1/2, CHEK2, and PALB2. The breast cancer patients who received genetic counseling but tested negative for the aforementioned gene mutations were used as a control group. RESULTS: Histologic characteristics of the breast cancers arising in monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers had significantly larger tumor size, higher tumor grade, and more high-risk biomarker profiles (i.e., Her2-positive and triple-negative) than breast cancer patients with susceptibility genes, except for BRCA1. MUTYH mutation carriers also showed a trend of more frequent intratumoral divergency in terms of tumor grade and biomarker profiles. CONCLUSION: Although germline monoallelic MUTYH mutation is not thought to confer a meaningfully increased risk of breast cancer development, it may contribute to pathological aggressiveness and diversity of breast cancers when they sporadically arise in MUTYH carriers.

Male Breast Cancer: a Review on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survivorship.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Male breast cancer is a relatively uncommon and rare disease that is often managed based on evidence adopted from trials pertaining to female breast cancer due to low accrual rates or exclusion of males. This is despite the known differences in the biology and epidemiology of this condition. This review provides an update regarding the management and surveillance of male breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Men with breast cancer tend to undergo more extensive surgery in the breast and axilla. The outcomes of male breast cancer compared to a similar subtype of female breast cancer appear worse when matched for stage. Systemic therapies remain predominantly based on recommendations for female breast cancer, although tamoxifen is the more optimal endocrine therapy for men than women. Surveillance with mammograms is recommended for patients harboring a breast cancer susceptibility gene but is otherwise not advised for men who have undergone a mastectomy. Notably, the role of other imaging modalities, including ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, is minimal. Although the focus on survivorship care among men is low, it is abundantly clear that this is a stigmatizing diagnosis for men, and they suffer from long-term physical and psychological sequelae following a diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. In summary, providing more gender-inclusive care and advocating for increased representation of men in prospective breast cancer studies and clinical trials may help improve outcomes and provide enhanced support for this population.

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: from genes to molecular targeted therapies.

Hereditary familial tumors constitute 10-15% of all malignancies and present opportunities for the identification of therapeutic approaches against specific germline genetic defects. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome, which is linked to the pathogenic mutations of the breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) genes, is an important research model for personalized therapeutic approaches for specific germline mutations. HBOC is characterized by multiple cases of breast and ovarian carcinoma in association with other tumors (prostate, pancreas and stomach carcinoma) within the same family branch, a young age of onset (<36 years), bilaterality and an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Counseling, evaluation of the clinical criteria for the diagnosis of HBOC, and the performance of genetic testing allow for the identification of subjects with BRCA1/2 mutations and provide crucial information for clinical and therapeutic management. The identification of a BRCA gene mutation has therapeutic implications for women with metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer. In the therapeutic setting of BRCA+ breast cancer, treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, which keep cancer cells from repairing their damaged DNA and cause cell death, is remarkable. This review summarizes the evidence demonstrating the value of BRCA1/2 status as a diagnostic and prognostic tool and as a predictive biomarker in the personalized approach to hereditary BRCA + cancers.

Non-BRCA1/BRCA2 high-risk familial breast cancers are not associated with a high prevalence of BRCAness.

BACKGROUND: Familial breast cancer is in most cases unexplained due to the lack of identifiable pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The somatic mutational landscape and in particular the extent of BRCA-like tumour features (BRCAness) in these familial breast cancers where germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have not been identified is to a large extent unknown. METHODS: We performed whole-genome sequencing on matched tumour and normal samples from high-risk non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer families to understand the germline and somatic mutational landscape and mutational signatures. We measured BRCAness using HRDetect. As a comparator, we also analysed samples from BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation carriers. RESULTS: We noted for non-BRCA1/BRCA2 tumours, only a small proportion displayed high HRDetect scores and were characterized by concomitant promoter hypermethylation or in one case a RAD51D splice variant previously reported as having unknown significance to potentially explain their BRCAness. Another small proportion showed no features of BRCAness but had mutationally active tumours. The remaining tumours lacked features of BRCAness and were mutationally quiescent. CONCLUSIONS: A limited fraction of high-risk familial non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer patients is expected to benefit from treatment strategies against homologue repair deficient cancer cells.

The role of next-generation sequencing in the examination of signaling genes in Brca1/2-negative breast cancer cases.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide. Although pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes are responsible for the majority of hereditary breast cancer cases, a substantial proportion of patients are negative for pathogenic variations in these genes. In cancers, the signal transduction pathways of the cell are usually affected first. Therefore, this study aimed to detect and classified genetic variations in non-BRCA signaling genes and investigate the underlying genetic causes of susceptibility to breast cancer. METHODS: Ninety-six patients without pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study, and 34 genes were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) for genetic analysis. RESULTS: Based on the ClinVar database or American College of Medical Genetics criteria, a total of 55 variants of 16 genes were detected in 43 (44.8%) of the 96 patients included in the study. The pathogenic variants were found in the TP53, CHEK2, and RET genes, whereas the likely pathogenic variants were found in the FGFR1, FGFR3, EGFR, and NOTCH1 genes. CONCLUSION: The examination of signaling genes in patients who met the established criteria for hereditary breast cancer but were negative for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants provided additional information for approximately 8% of the families. The results of the present study suggest that NGS is a powerful tool for investigating the underlying genetic causes of occurrence and progression of breast cancer.

Prognostic impact of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the impact of different subtypes of pathogenic BRCA variants on the prognosis and on the survival of breast cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: Associations between BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) mutations, clinicopathological features, locoregional tumor reappearance, and survival data were analyzed. The Gray's test was used to test difference of the cumulative incidence of local relapse between missense/splicing and other mutations, taking into of competing events. The multivariate proportional hazard model was used to assess the independent association between type of mutation and local relapse, after adjustment for other prognostic factors and clinicopathological characteristics. RESULTS: Out of 482 patients, 285 presented 98 different BRCA1 PVs and 201 harbored 103 different BRCA2 PVs. Missense mutations were found in 46 BC patients (9.5%), splicing mutations in 42 (8.6%), deletions in 206 (42.4%), insertions in 73 (15%), indel mutations in 6 (1.2%), nonsense mutations in 86 (17.7%), and large rearrangements in 27 (5.6%). Kalbfleisch and Prentice cumulative incidence curves analysis showed a significantly lower locoregional recurrence incidence in the missense/splicing group (Gray-test P-value = 0.011). We found that the risk of local relapse was 58% less likely in women carrying missense/splicing variants than in those with other PV subtypes (HR 95% CI 0.42 [0.21-0.82]; P-value = 0.0108). No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS) in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Having been found to be associated with a lower risk of BC reappearance, germline BRCA1/2 PVs of the missense/splicing subtypes can be used as prognostic predictors and are likely to improve BC patients' management.

Frequency of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes among young Turkish breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: One of the most important risk factors for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is young age. We aim to report the frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposing genes in young (≤ 40 years old) breast cancer patients who undergone 26-gene inherited cancer panel at our Breast Health Center. METHODS: Medical records of breast cancer patients who were referred to genetic counseling based on NCCN criteria and were ≤ 40 years of age are reviewed. The frequency of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants who undergone 26-gene inherited cancer panel was analyzed. RESULTS: Among 414 breast cancer patients who were ≤ 40 years of age, 308 undergone 26-gene inherited cancer panel and 108 had next generation sequencing (NGS)-based BRCA 1 and 2 genetic testing. Median age was 35 (22-40), Family history in first degree relatives was present in 14% of patients. Forty-five percent of patients met one of the NCCN criteria for genetic testing, 41% of them met two criteria, and 14% of patients fulfilled ≥ 3 criteria. Seventy pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPV) were found in 65 (21%) patients. PV/LPs in BRCA genes and non-BRCA genes represented 53% and 44% of all PV/LPVs, accounting for 12% and 10% of patients in the study cohort respectively. Two PVs were present in 5 patients and eleven PVs were novel. The most common PVs were in BRCA 1 (n:18), BRCA 2 (n:19), ATM (n:7), CHEK2 (n:7) and TP53 (n:5) genes. Thirty-one percent of the patients with triple-negative tumors and 25% of the patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors had PV/LPVs with panel testing. Family history in first degree relatives (p = 0.029), the number of met NCCN criteria (p = 0.036) and axillary nodal involvement (p = 0.000) were more common in patients with PVs. When combined with patient group (n:106) who had only BRCA1 and 2 gene testing, 16% of Turkish breast cancer patients ≤ 40 years of age had PVs in BRCA genes. CONCLUSION: One fifth of Turkish breast cancer patients ≤ 40 years of age had at least one PV/LPV in breast cancer predisposing genes with 26-gene inherited cancer panel. The frequency of PV/LPVs was higher in triple-negative young-onset patients compared to hormone receptor and Her-2 positive subtypes. Our findings regarding to frequency PV/LPVs in BRCA 1/2 and non-BRCA genes in young-onset breast cancer patients are in line with the literature.

Extended genetic analysis and tumor characteristics in over 4600 women with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Genetic screening for pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer predisposition genes can affect treatment strategies, risk prediction and preventive measures for patients and families. For decades, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) has been attributed to PVs in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, and more recently other rare alleles have been firmly established as associated with a high or moderate increased risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. Here, we assess the genetic variation and tumor characteristics in a large cohort of women with suspected HBOC in a clinical oncogenetic setting. METHODS: Women with suspected HBOC referred from all oncogenetic clinics in Sweden over a six-year inclusion period were screened for PVs in 13 clinically relevant genes. The genetic outcome was compared with tumor characteristics and other clinical data collected from national cancer registries and hospital records. RESULTS: In 4622 women with breast and/or ovarian cancer the overall diagnostic yield (the proportion of women carrying at least one PV) was 16.6%. BRCA1/2 PVs were found in 8.9% of women (BRCA1 5.95% and BRCA2 2.94%) and PVs in the other breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes in 8.2%: ATM (1.58%), BARD1 (0.45%), BRIP1 (0.43%), CDH1 (0.11%), CHEK2 (3.46%), PALB2 (0.84%), PTEN (0.02%), RAD51C (0.54%), RAD51D (0.15%), STK11 (0) and TP53 (0.56%). Thus, inclusion of the 11 genes in addition to BRCA1/2 increased diagnostic yield by 7.7%. The yield was, as expected, significantly higher in certain subgroups such as younger patients, medullary breast cancer, higher Nottingham Histologic Grade, ER-negative breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer and high grade serous ovarian cancer. Age and tumor subtype distributions differed substantially depending on genetic finding. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to understanding the clinical and genetic landscape of breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. Extending clinical genetic screening from BRCA1 and BRCA2 to 13 established cancer predisposition genes almost doubles the diagnostic yield, which has implications for genetic counseling and clinical guidelines. The very low yield in the syndrome genes CDH1, PTEN and STK11 questions the usefulness of including these genes on routine gene panels.

Minigene-based splicing analysis and ACMG/AMP-based tentative classification of 56 ATM variants.

The ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) protein is a major coordinator of the DNA damage response pathway. ATM loss-of-function variants are associated with 2-fold increased breast cancer risk. We aimed at identifying and classifying spliceogenic ATM variants detected in subjects of the large-scale sequencing project BRIDGES. A total of 381 variants at the intron-exon boundaries were identified, 128 of which were predicted to be spliceogenic. After further filtering, we ended up selecting 56 variants for splicing analysis. Four functional minigenes (mgATM) spanning exons 4-9, 11-17, 25-29, and 49-52 were constructed in the splicing plasmid pSAD. Selected variants were genetically engineered into the four constructs and assayed in MCF-7/HeLa cells. Forty-eight variants (85.7%) impaired splicing, 32 of which did not show any trace of the full-length (FL) transcript. A total of 43 transcripts were identified where the most prevalent event was exon/multi-exon skipping. Twenty-seven transcripts were predicted to truncate the ATM protein. A tentative ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology)-based classification scheme that integrates mgATM data allowed us to classify 29 ATM variants as pathogenic/likely pathogenic and seven variants as likely benign. Interestingly, the likely pathogenic variant c.1898+2T>G generated 13% of the minigene FL-transcript due to the use of a noncanonical GG-5'-splice-site (0.014% of human donor sites). Circumstantial evidence in three ATM variants (leakiness uncovered by our mgATM analysis together with clinical data) provides some support for a dosage-sensitive expression model in which variants producing ≥30% of FL-transcripts would be predicted benign, while variants producing ≤13% of FL-transcripts might be pathogenic. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Breast cancer surveillance in BRCA positive Sri Lankan women: health equity for a high-risk group at a limited resource setting.

BACKGROUND: BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants account for 90% of hereditary breast malignancies, incurring a lifetime breast cancer risk of 85% and 40-45% respectively, in affected individuals. Well-resourced health care settings offer genetic counselling and genetic screening for susceptible individuals, followed by intense breast cancer surveillance programmes for those identified at high risk of breast cancer. Such high standards of care are not available in countries with limited resources. This study assessed breast cancer surveillance behaviors among a cohort of BRCA positive Sri Lankan women. METHODS: A retrospective case review of all patients diagnosed with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes from 2015 to 2022 at the Human Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo was carried out followed by telephone interviews of the respondents. Patients who were not contactable, deceased, undergone bilateral mastectomy and males were excluded from the interview component of the study. Standard descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data using SPSS statistics version 25. RESULTS: Only 25 patients were diagnosed during the study period:14/25 women responded (6/25 deceased, 3/25 non-contactable; 2/25 excluded). 71.4% (10/14) had performed breast self-examination during the preceding month; 35.7% (5/14) had a clinical breast examination (CBE), and 50% (7/14) had undergone a screening/diagnostic mammogram during the last one year. 28.5% (4/14) had undergone both mammography and CBE; 21.45% (3/14) mammogram only, 7.1% (1/14) had CBE only. 42.8%(6/14) had not undergone any surveillance(mammography, CBE or MRI). None had dual screening with mammogram and MRI. 85.71% (12/14) women expressed willingness to participate in a regular screening programme if made available. CONCLUSION: Fifty percent of BRCA1/2 positive women in our study had not undergone annual imaging-based surveillance by mammography or MRI, and none had undergone annual dual screening with mammography and MRI, indicating inadequate breast cancer surveillance in this high-risk group.

Promotores' perspectives on the virtual adaptation of a hereditary breast cancer education program.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in the United States (U.S.) and the leading cause of cancer related death among U.S. Hispanics/Latinas (H/Ls). H/Ls have lower rates of screening and longer time to follow up after an abnormal mammogram. We developed a comprehensive community health educator (promotores)-led education and risk identification program for Spanish-speaking H/Ls in California to increase mammography screening, genetic testing, and the understanding of the impact of family history on cancer risk. Due to COVID-19, we adapted the program to a virtual platform. The experience of transforming the program to a virtual platform provided unique opportunities for collaboration between researchers, community partners, and participants. Promotores are major partners in community based participatory research and in the provision of health care services, but their voices are often excluded from scientific reports. This commentary is an effort to provide a platform for promotores to share their experiences and for the readers to understand their approach in bridging the gap between health care services and communities.

Interdisciplinary risk counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: real-world data from a specialized center.

PURPOSE: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has long been established to affect a considerable number of patients and their families. By identifying those at risk ideally before they have been diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer, access to preventive measures, intensified screening and special therapeutic options can be obtained, and thus, prognosis can be altered beneficially. Therefore, a standardized screening and counseling process has been established in Germany under the aegis of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC). As one of these specialized clinics, the HBOC-Center at Charité offers genetic counseling as well as genetic analysis based on the GC-HBOC standards. This analysis aims first at depicting this process from screening through counseling to genetic analysis as well as the patient collective and second at correlating the results of genetic analysis performed. Thus, real-world data from an HBOC-Center with a substantial patient collective and a high frequency of pathogenic variants in various genes shall be presented. METHODS: The data of 2531 people having been counseled at the HBOC-Center at Charité in 2016 and 2017 were analyzed in terms of patient and family history as well as pathogenic variants detected during genetic analysis with the TruRisk® gene panel when genetic analysis was conducted. This standardized analysis is compiled and regularly adjusted by the GC-HBOC. The following genes were included at time of research: BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, NBN, and TP53. RESULTS: Genetic analysis was conducted in 59.8% of all cases meeting the criteria for genetic analysis and 286 pathogenic variants were detected among 278 (30.3%) counselees tested using the TruRisk® gene panel. These were primarily found in the genes BRCA1 (44.8%) and BRCA2 (28.3%) but also in CHEK2 (12.2%), ATM (5.6%) and PALB2 (3.5%). The highest prevalence of pathogenic variants was seen among the families with both ovarian and breast cancer (50.5%), followed by families with ovarian cancer only (43.2%) and families with breast cancer only (35.6%)-these differences are statistically significant (p < 0.001). Considering breast cancer subtypes, the highest rate of pathogenic variants was detected among patients with triple-negative breast cancer (40.7%) and among patients who had had been diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer before the age of 40 (53.4%)-both observations proved to be statistically significant (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Genetic counseling and analysis provide the foundation in the prevention and therapy of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The rate of pathogenic variants detected is associated with family history as well as breast cancer subtype and age at diagnosis, and can reach considerable dimensions. Therefore, a standardized process of identification, genetic counseling and genetic analysis deems mandatory.

Somatic loss of the remaining allele occurs approximately in half of CHEK2-driven breast cancers and is accompanied by a border-line increase of chromosomal instability.

PURPOSE: Germline mutations in CHEK2 gene represent the second most frequent cause of hereditary breast cancer (BC) after BRCA1/2 lesions. This study aimed to identify the molecular characteristics of CHEK2-driven BCs. METHODS: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for the remaining CHEK2 allele was examined in 50 CHEK2-driven BCs using allele-specific PCR assays for the germline mutations and analysis of surrounding single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Paired tumor and normal DNA samples from 25 cases were subjected to next-generation sequencing analysis. RESULTS: CHEK2 LOH was detected in 28/50 (56%) BCs. LOH involved the wild-type allele in 24 BCs, mutant CHEK2 copy was deleted in 3 carcinomas, while in one case the origin of the deleted allele could not be identified. Somatic PIK3CA and TP53 mutations were present in 13/25 (52%) and 4/25 (16%) tumors, respectively. Genomic features of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), including the HRD score ≥ 42, the predominance of BRCA-related mutational signature 3, and the high proportion of long (≥ 5 bp) indels, were observed only in 1/20 (5%) BC analyzed for chromosomal instability. Tumors with the deleted wild-type CHEK2 allele differed from LOH-negative cases by elevated HRD scores (median 23 vs. 7, p = 0.010) and higher numbers of chromosomal segments affected by copy number aberrations (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Somatic loss of the wild-type CHEK2 allele is observed in approximately half of CHEK2-driven BCs. Tumors without CHEK2 LOH are chromosomally stable. BCs with LOH demonstrate some signs of chromosomal instability; however, its degree is significantly lower as compared to BRCA1/2-associated cancers.

An overview of genetic services delivery for hereditary breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide, with approximately 5-10% of cases attributed to high penetrance hereditary breast cancer (HBC) genes. The tremendous advances in precision oncology have broadened indications for germline genetic testing to guide both systemic and surgical treatment, with increasing demand for cancer genetic services. The HBC continuum of care includes (1) identification, access, and uptake of genetic counseling and testing; (2) the delivery of genetic counseling and testing services; and (3) initiation of guideline-adherent follow-up care and family communication of results. Challenges to delivering care on the HBC care continuum include factors such as access to services, cost, discrimination and bias, and lack of education and awareness, which can be mitigated through implementing a multi-level approach. This includes strategies such as increasing awareness and utilization of genetic counseling and testing, developing new methods to meet the growing demand for genetic services, and improving the uptake of follow-up care by increasing patient and provider awareness of the management recommendations.