RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Etoposide to standard R-CHOP is used for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in some countries. Due to the lack of randomized trials, a real-world data study using matching methods was used to test the potential effectiveness of R-CHOEP over R-CHOP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included patients from the Danish Lymphoma Register diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 at the age of 18-60 years with de novo DLBCL and age-adjusted IPI ≥2. R-CHOEP treated patients were matched 1:1 without replacement to R-CHOP treated patients using a hybrid exact and genetic matching technique. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 396 patients were included; 213 received R-CHOEP and 183 received R-CHOP. Unadjusted 5-year PFS and OS for R-CHOEP were 69% (95% Confidence intervals [CI]; 63%-76%) and 79% (CI;73%-85%) versus 62% (CI;55%-70%) and 76% (CI;69%-82%) for R-CHOP (log-rank test, PFS p = .25 and OS p = .31). A total of 127 patients treated with R-CHOEP were matched to 127 patients treated with R-CHOP. Matching-adjusted 5-year PFS and OS were 65% (CI; 57%-74%) and 79% (CI; 72%-84%) for R-CHOEP versus 63% (CI; 55%-73%) and 79% (CI;72%-87%) for R-CHOP (log-rank test, PFS p = .90 and OS p = .63). CONCLUSION: The present study did not confirm superiority of R-CHOEP over R-CHOP for young patients with high-risk DLBCL.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Ciclofosfamida , Doxorrubicina , Etopósido , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Prednisona , Rituximab , Vincristina , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sistema de Registros , Vigilancia de la Población , PrednisolonaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Appropriate prescription of Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remains an important concern amid the rising overuse. A gap exists in the literature regarding the benefit of PPI prophylaxis and the consequences of underprescription in patients at risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). AIMS: This study aims to describe the characteristics of hemorrhage in relation to PPI use in patients experiencing UGIB, with a focus on high-risk individuals requiring gastroprotection. METHODS: Data from a French multicentric cohort of patients experiencing UGIB were analyzed. Patients using PPI were compared to those without PPI considering bleeding etiologies and outcomes of peptic ulcer disease (PUD)-related hemorrhage. The rate of PPI use and its effect on bleeding characteristics in high-risk populations, defined based on international guidelines, were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 2497 included patients, 31.1% were on PPI at bleeding onset. PPI users exhibited a significantly lower rate of PUD-related bleeding in comparison with those without PPI (24.7 vs 40.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Similar difference was observed in high-risk populations, of whom, only 40.3% had gastroprotection with PPI before bleeding onset. PPI prophylaxis, however, did not influence the severity of bleeding in the general study population or in high-risk groups. Multivariate analysis identified age, comorbidities, and having more than two anti-thrombotic agents as predictors of severe bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: PPI users appear to have a lower rate of bleeding ulcers compared to non-users. However, underprescription in high-risk groups raises the need for standardized care to ensure appropriate PPI use.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Major emergency abdominal surgery is associated with severe postoperative complications and high short- and long-term mortality. Despite recent advancements in standardizing multidisciplinary care bundles, a subgroup of patients continues to face a heightened risk of short-term mortality. This study aimed to identify and describe the high-risk surgical patients and risk factors for short-term postoperative mortality. METHODS: In this study, we included all patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery over 2 years and collected data on demographics, intraoperative variables, and short-term outcomes. The primary outcome measure was short-term mortality and secondary outcome measures were pre, intra, and postoperative risk factors for premature death. Multivariable binary regression analysis was performed to determine possible risk factors for short-term mortality. RESULTS: Short-term mortality within 14 days of surgery in this cohort of 754 consecutive patients was 8%. Multivariable analysis identified various independent risk factors for short-term mortality throughout different phases of patient care. These factors included advanced age, preoperative history of myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, and vascular bowel ischemia or perforation of the stomach or duodenum during the primary surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients at high risk of early mortality following major emergency abdominal surgery exhibited distinct perioperative risk factors. This study underscores the importance of clinicians identifying and managing these factors in high-risk patients to ensure optimal care.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Abdomen/cirugía , Urgencias Médicas , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of rejection is 10-30% in penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) case, and the rate is higher in cases of high-risk patients. Although using topical corticosteroids is a standard method for management the rejection of post-PKP patients, it may not be sufficiently potent in high-risk patients. Topical administration of tacrolimus (TAC) may be effective in suppression rejection after corneal transplantation. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of topical TAC in high-risk PKP patients in Japan. METHODS: This study was a single centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients with a history of PKP, graft rejection, atopic dermatitis, or deep corneal neovascularisation who underwent PKP were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to receive 0.1% TAC ophthalmic suspension or artificial tear (AT) up to week 52 after surgery. All participants received 0.1% betamethasone up to week 13 after surgery then they received 0.1% fluorometholone up to week 52. The incidence of immunological rejection during the observation period was the main outcome measure in this study. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled in this study, and 12 eyes in the TAC group and 13 eyes in the AT group completed the study, respectively. Five out of 30 patients discontinued participation after providing informed consent. No serious adverse effects were developed in patients who received 0.1% TAC ophthalmic suspension. No rejection episodes occurred in the TAC group, while one eye in the AT group had rejection. Graft clarity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and corneal endothelial cell density were not significantly different between the TAC and AT groups. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that good tolerability of 0.1% TAC ophthalmic suspension. However, we failed to demonstrate its efficacy in preventing immunological rejection in high-risk patients undergoing PKP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was first registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000029669, Date of registration: November 1, 2017). With the enforcement of the Clinical Trial Act in Japan, the study re-registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180342, Date of registration: March 18, 2019).
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Inmunosupresores , Queratoplastia Penetrante , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Tacrolimus , Humanos , Tacrolimus/administración & dosificación , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Anciano , Queratoplastia Penetrante/métodos , Método Simple Ciego , Administración Tópica , Agudeza Visual , AdultoRESUMEN
Fluorescence imaging is currently being actively developed for surgical guidance; however, it remains underutilized for diagnostic and endoscopic surveillance of incipient colorectal cancer in high-risk patients. Here we demonstrate the utility and potential for clinical translation of a fluorescently labeled cathepsin-activated chemical probe to highlight gastrointestinal lesions. This probe stays optically dark until it is activated by proteases produced by tumor-associated macrophages and accumulates within the lesions, enabling their detection using an endoscope outfitted with a fluorescence detector. We evaluated the probe in multiple murine models and a human-scale porcine model of gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. The probe provides fluorescence-guided surveillance of gastrointestinal lesions and augments histopathological analysis by highlighting areas of dysplasia as small as 400 µm, which were visibly discernible with significant tumor-to-background ratios, even in tissues with a background of severe inflammation and ulceration. Given these results, we anticipate that this probe will enable sensitive fluorescence-guided biopsies, even in the presence of highly inflamed colorectal tissue, which will improve early diagnosis to prevent gastrointestinal cancers.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Endoscopía/métodos , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico , Animales , Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorescencia , Colorantes Fluorescentes , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Tracto Gastrointestinal/patología , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Imagen Molecular/métodos , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Ratas , Ratas Endogámicas , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/prevención & control , PorcinosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aimed to collate the available evidence on outcomes following routine functional stress testing vs standard of care (i.e. symptom-guided stress testing) in high-risk patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). RECENT FINDINGS: The most recent pragmatic POST-PCI trial provided randomized evidence showing that routine functional stress testing post-PCI did not lead to a reduction in 2-year ischemic cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality, as compared to a symptom-guided standard-of-care approach. This was also true for sub-analyses including multivessel or left main disease, diabetics, as well as following imaging or physiology guided PCI. In the absence of a change in their clinical or functional status suggestive of stent failure, post-PCI routine periodic stress testing in stable patients on guideline-directed medical therapy is currently not recommended by American clinical practice guidelines. While evidence on the cost-effectiveness of routine stress testing strategy is scarce, physician, payer, and policy-level interventions to reduce inappropriate use of routine functional testing need to be addressed.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Nivel de Atención , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most consistently reported complication of cranioplasty. No material showed a categorical superiority in the incidence of infection. Porous polyethylene (PE) is considered a low risk material regarding SSI. However, the literature data are very limited. Thus, our objective was to verify the assumed low incidence of SSI after PE cranioplasty in patients at high risk of SSI. The primary objective was the infection rate, while secondary objectives were implant exposure, revision and cosmetic results. METHOD: Patients who underwent three-dimensional (3D) personalized PE cranioplasty in the period 2014-2023 were evaluated prospectively. Only patients with an increased risk of SSI, and a satisfactory clinical conditions were included in the study. RESULTS: Thirty procedures were performed in 30 patients. Cranioplasty was performed 23 times after hemispheric decompressive craniectomy, five times after limited size craniotomy and two times after bifrontal decompressive craniectomy. Risk factors for the development of infection were 18 previous SSIs, 16 previous repeated revision surgeries, four intraoperatively opened frontal sinuses and two times radiotherapy. Neither infection nor implant exposure was detected in any patient. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic result. In two cases, a revision was performed due to postoperative epidural hematoma. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional personalized PE cranioplasty is associated with an extremely low incidence of SSI even in high-risk patients. However, our conclusions can only be confirmed in larger studies.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Polietileno , Factores de Riesgo , Cráneo/cirugía , Craniectomía Descompresiva/efectos adversos , Craniectomía Descompresiva/métodos , Porosidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Craneotomía/métodosRESUMEN
Objective: To determine trend of following medical advice and safety of high-risk diabetic patients during Ramadan practicing updated IDF DAR guidelines. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted at Outpatient Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Disorders Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Pakistan from April to June 2022, and comprised of high-risk diabetic patients (>6.0) based on updated IDF-DAR guidelines 2022 intending to fast. A questionnaire was designed to document patient risk factors score, type and duration of diabetes, HbA1c, comorbidities and complications developed during Ramadan. Data was analyzed using SPSS 20. Results: Among all 130 participants, 78(60%) followed medical advice and did not fast and 52(40%) patients fasted against medical advice during month of Ramadan. Out of 130 participants, 89.2% were having type-2 diabetes Mellitus, 55.4% were female and mean age of participants was 52+14.6.40%. In fasting group, 57.7% were in the age range of 16 to 50 years while in non-fasting group 69.2% participants were more than 50 years old (P-value 0.031). There were 80.8% female participants in fasting group versus 38.5% in non-fasting group (P-value 0.001). Hypoglycemia occurred in 58.3% patients in fasting group and 29.3% non-fasting group. (P-value 0.021). On the other hand, 27.8% patients in fasting group and 55.2% of non-fasting group had hyperglycemia (P-value 0.025). Conclusion: Despite advised against fasting in these high-risk patients as per IDF DAR guidelines, almost half of patients fasted considering fasting a religious obligation. Those who fasted had significant hypoglycemia despite adjustment of medications as in guidelines. There is need of more intensive education before fasting, especially in high-risk diabetic patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acceleration of negative respiratory conversion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might reduce viral transmission. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is a new antiviral agent recently approved for treatment of COVID-19 that has the potential to facilitate negative conversion. METHODS: A cohort of hospitalized adult patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who had a high risk for progression to severe disease were studied. These patients presented with COVID-19 symptoms between 5 March and 5 April 2022. The time from positive to negative upper respiratory reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) conversion was assessed by Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards regression with the adjustment for patients' baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: There were 258 patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and 224 nontreated patients who had mild-to-moderate COVID-19. The median (interquartile range) time for patients who converted from positive to negative RT-PCR was 10 days (7-12 days) in patients treated ≤5 days after symptom onset and 17 days (12-21 days) in nontreated patients. The proportions of patients with a negative conversion at day 15 were 89.7% and 42.0% in treated patients and nontreated patients, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 4.33 (95% confidence interval, 3.31-5.65). Adjustment for baseline differences between the groups had little effect on the association. Subgroup analysis on treated patients suggests that time to negative conversion did not vary with the patients' baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort study of high-risk patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 found an association between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment and accelerated negative RT-PCR respiratory SARS-CoV-2 conversion that might reduce the risk of viral shedding and disease transmission.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Estudios de Cohortes , Transcripción Reversa , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess whether postoperative adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy could lead to better clinical outcomes for high-risk patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). METHODS: In the cohort study, we retrospectively reviewed patients who received surgical resection for pCCA with curative intent from January 2018 to December 2021 at the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. The patients at high risk for relapse were further analyzed. Among them, 20 patients received adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, 28 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 33 patients received surgery alone. The oncological outcomes and drug-associated adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: The 2-year overall survival (OS) rates in patients treated with adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and surgery alone were 80.0%, 49.4% and 22.6%, respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses showed that the treatment regimen and TNM stage were associated with adverse OS. Adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy led to an increase in OS compared with adjuvant chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.253; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.072-9.870; P = 0.037] or surgery alone (HR = 7.560; 95% CI 2.508-22.785; P < 0.001). The median recurrence-free survival was 22.0 months for the adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group, 17.0 months for the adjuvant chemotherapy group, and 13.2 months for the surgery alone group (P = 0.177); these differences were not significant. The chemoimmunotherapy group was associated with more frequent hematological side effects than the chemotherapy group, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Postoperative adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resected pCCA patients showed improved OS compared with adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone, and further prospectively randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate these results.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Tumor de Klatskin , Humanos , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Tumor de Klatskin/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe bacterial infection. As a measure of prevention, the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) prior to dental procedures was recommended in the past. However, between 2007 and 2009, guidelines for IE prophylaxis changed all around the word, limiting or supporting the complete cessation of AP. It remains unclear whether AP is effective or not against IE. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review whether the administration of AP in adults before any dental procedure, compared to the non-administration of such drugs, has an effect on the risk of developing IE. We searched for studies in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE via OVID, and EMBASE. Two different authors filtered articles independently and data extraction was performed based on a pre-defined protocol. RESULTS: The only cohort study meeting our criteria included patients at high-risk of IE. Analysis of the extracted data showed a non-significant decrease in the risk of IE when high-risk patients take AP prior to invasive dental procedures (RR 0.39, p-value 0.11). We did not find other studies including patients at low or moderate risk of IE. Qualitative evaluation of the excluded articles reveals diversity of results and suggests that most of the state-of-the-art articles are underpowered. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence to support or discourage the use of AP prior to dental procedures as a prevention for IE is very low. New high-quality studies are needed, even though such studies would require big settings and might not be immediately feasible.
Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Adulto , Humanos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Estudios de Cohortes , Endocarditis Bacteriana/prevención & control , Endocarditis/prevención & control , OdontologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: This study compares clinical outcomes between leadless pacemakers (leadless-VVI) and transvenous ventricular pacemakers (transvenous ventricular permanent-VVI) in subgroups of patients at higher risk of pacemaker complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is based on the Micra Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) study. Patients from the Micra CED study were considered in a high-risk subgroup if they had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease Stages 4-5 (CKD45), end-stage renal disease, malignancy, diabetes, tricuspid valve disease (TVD), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 12 months prior to pacemaker implant. A pre-specified set of complications and reinterventions were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. Competing risks models were used to compare reinterventions and complications between leadless-VVI and transvenous-VVI patients within each subgroup; results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. A post hoc comparison of a composite outcome of reinterventions and device complications was conducted. Out of 27 991 patients, 9858 leadless-VVI and 12 157 transvenous-VVI patients have at least one high-risk comorbidity. Compared to transvenous-VVI patients, leadless-VVI patients in four subgroups [malignancy, HR 0.68 (0.48-0.95); diabetes, HR 0.69 (0.53-0.89); TVD, HR 0.60 (0.44-0.82); COPD, HR 0.73 (0.55-0.98)] had fewer complications, in three subgroups [diabetes, HR 0.58 (0.37-0.89); TVD, HR 0.46 (0.28-0.76); COPD, HR 0.51 (0.29-0.90)) had fewer reinterventions, and in four subgroups (malignancy, HR 0.52 (0.32-0.83); diabetes, HR 0.52 (0.35-0.77); TVD, HR 0.44 (0.28-0.70); COPD, HR 0.55 (0.34-0.89)] had lower rates of the combined outcome. CONCLUSION: In a real-world study, leadless pacemaker patients had lower 2-year complications and reinterventions rates compared with transvenous-VVI pacing in several high-risk subgroups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03039712.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Fallo Renal Crónico , Marcapaso Artificial , Humanos , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/efectos adversos , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the opportunities for shared decision-making when older high-risk patients are offered major surgery. This study examines how, when, and why clinicians and patients can share decision-making about major surgery. METHODS: This was a multi-method qualitative study, combining video recordings of preoperative consultations, interviews, and focus groups (33 patients, 19 relatives, 36 clinicians), with observations and documentary analysis in clinics in five hospitals in the UK undertaking major orthopaedic, colorectal, and/or cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Three opportunities for shared decision-making about major surgery were identified. Resolution-focused consultations (cardiac/colorectal) resulted in a single agreed preferred option related to a potentially life-threatening problem, with limited opportunities for shared decision-making. Evaluative and deliberative consultations offered more opportunity. The former focused on assessing the likelihood of benefits of surgery for a presenting problem that was not a threat to life for the patient (e.g., orthopaedic consultations) and the latter (largely colorectal) involved discussion of a range of options while also considering significant comorbidities and patient preferences. The extent to which opportunities for shared decision-making were available, and taken up by surgeons, was influenced by the nature of the presenting problem, clinical pathway, and patient trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: Decisions about major surgery were not always shared between patients and doctors. The nature of the presenting problem, comorbidities, clinical pathways, and patient trajectories all informed the type of consultation and opportunities for sharing decision-making. Our findings have implications for clinicians, with shared decision-making about major surgery most feasible when the focus is on life-enhancing treatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Cirujanos , Humanos , Toma de Decisiones , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Grabación en Video , Participación del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-PacienteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although mortality and morbidity of severe acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) are still a matter of concern, the impact of inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy has been poorly studied as a risk factor. The objective was to assess the impact of the adequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy on complication and mortality rates in ACC. METHODS: This observational retrospective cohort chart-based single-center study was conducted between 2012 and 2016. A total of 963 consecutive patients were included, and pure ACC was selected. General, clinical, postoperative, and microbiological variables were collected, and risk factors and consequences of inadequate treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Bile, blood, and/or exudate cultures were obtained in 76.3% of patients, more often in old, male, and severely ill patients (P < 0.001). Patients who were cultured had a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (47.4% vs. 29.7%; P < 0.001), as well as of severe complications (11.6% vs. 4.7%; P = 0.008). Patients with positive cultures had more overall complications (54.8% vs. 39.6%; P = 0.001), more severe complications (16.3% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.001), and higher mortality rates (6% vs. 1.9%; P = 0.012). Patients who received inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy had a fourfold higher mortality rate than those receiving adequate therapy (n = 283; 12.8% vs. 3.4%; P = 0.003). This association was especially marked in severe ACC TG-III patients (n = 132; 18.2 vs. 5.1%; P = 0.018) and remained a predictor of mortality in a binary logistic regression (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.3-15.3). CONCLUSION: Patients with positive cultures developed more complications and faced higher mortality. Adequate empirical antibiotic therapy appears to be of paramount importance in ACC, particularly in severely ill patients.
Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colecistitis Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Periodo Posoperatorio , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients who "no-show" (NS) clinical appointments are at a high risk of adverse health outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate and characterize the relationship between NS visits prior to primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 90-day complications after TKA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 6,776 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA. Study groups were separated based on whether patients who NS versus always attended their appointment. A NS was defined as an intended appointment that was not canceled or rescheduled ≤2 hours before the appointment in which the patient did not show. Data collected included total number of follow-up appointments prior to surgery, patient demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: Patients who have ≥3 NS appointments had 1.5 times increased odds of a surgical site infection (odds ratio (OR) 1.54, P = .002) compared to always attended patients. Patients who were ≤65 years old (OR: 1.41, P < .001), smokers (OR: 2.01, P < .001), and had a Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (OR: 4.48, P < .001) were more likely to miss clinical appointments. CONCLUSION: Patients who have ≥3 NS appointments prior to TKA had an increased risk for surgical site infection. Sociodemographic factors were associated with higher odds of missing a scheduled clinical appointment. These data suggest that orthopaedic surgeons should consider NS data as an important clinical decision-making tool to assess risk for postoperative complications to minimize complications following TKA.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Humanos , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Comorbilidad , Pacientes , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with excellent results in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In highly calcified aortic anuli with increased risk of annulus rupture and in favor of the supra-annular design, self-expandable prostheses are frequently used. In this regard, we aimed to perform a comparative analysis of clinical and 30-day outcomes after TAVR using the self-expanding CoreValve® Evolut R or ACURATE neo™ prosthesis. METHODS: Out of 343 consecutive patients treated with either CoreValve® Evolut R or ACURATE neo™ from January 2014 to December 2017, 76 patients were assigned each per group after 1:1 propensity score matching in regard of preoperative characteristics. Pre- and periprocedural outcomes were retrospectively collected and assessed. Outcomes at 30 days are reported according to the established Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. RESULTS: Device success and 30-day survival accounted for 93.4% (n = 71), respectively 97.4% (n = 74) in both groups (p = 1.00). No statistically significant differences regarding clinical parameters were observed. The combined safety endpoint at 30 days was comparable (84.2% (n = 64) CoreValve® vs 85.5% (n = 65) ACURATE neo™; p = 0.848). Except a trend toward higher stroke (p = 0.08) and pacemaker (p = 0.07) rate in the CoreValve® group, major vascular complications, incidence of life-threatening or disabling bleeding, and incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury were comparable. Postoperative hemodynamic parameters showed no significant differences between the implanted valves. CONCLUSION: Both self-expandable prostheses showed good postoperative hemodynamic performance with a low incidence of severe paravalvular leakage, all- cause mortality, and comparable clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodosRESUMEN
Telemedicine (TM) is a useful tool to extend medical care during a pandemic. TM was extensively utilized in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic as part of the Nation's COVID-19 healthcare strategy. Patients were risk stratified to prioritize limited healthcare resources and the Telemedicine Allocation Reconciliation System (TMARS) was adapted to monitor and manage limited TM resources. High-Risk patients (Protocol 1) had an escalation rate of 4.87%, compared to the non-High-Risk patients' 0.002% and TM doctors spent an average of six hours to complete one tele-consultation. In order to optimize the efficiency of the TM system, an enhanced monitoring system was implemented in March 2022. The intent was to focus monitoring efforts on the High-Risk patients. High-Risk patients reporting sick for the first time were prioritized to receive tele-consultations through this system. With the aid of a data-driven dashboard, the Operations Control and Monitoring team (OCM) was able to closely monitor the performance of the various TM providers (TMPs), sent them timely reminders and re-assigned patients to other TMPs when the requisite turnaround time was not met. Implementing the enhanced monitoring system resulted in a significant reduction in the average time taken to provide tele-consultations. After 3 months of implementation, the percentages of consultations completed within two hours were raised from 75.7% (February 2022) to 96.8% (May 2022), greatly increasing productivity and efficiency.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Telemedicina/métodos , Atención a la Salud , Monitoreo FisiológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term rhythm monitoring (LTRM) can detect undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients at high risk of AF and stroke. Biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters could, however, help identify patients benefitting most from LTRM. The aim of this study was to investigate, whether circulating biomarkers of cardiac and vascular function (brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), copeptin, and mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM)) and echocardiographic parameters were associated with incident subclinical AF (SCAF) in a population at high risk of stroke in the presence of AF. For this purpose, we investigated individuals ≥65 years of age with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, but no history or symptoms of AF or other cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: We included 82 consecutive patients (median age 71.3 years (IQR 67.4-75.1)). All patients received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) and were followed for a median of 588 days (IQR 453-712). On the day of ICM implantation, a comprehensive echocardiogram and blood samples were obtained. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 588 days (IQR: 453-712 days), incident SCAF occurred in 17 patients (20.7%) with a median time to first-detected episode of 91 days (IQR 41-251 days). MR-proADM (median 0.87 nmol/L (IQR 0.76-1.02) vs 0.78 nmol/L (IQR 0.68-0.98)) and copeptin (median 13 pmol/L (IQR 9-17) vs 8 pmol/L (IQR 4-18)) levels were insignificantly higher in patients with incident SCAF. BNP and cTnI concentrations and echocardiographic parameters were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: MR-proADM, BNP, cTnI, copeptin, and several echocardiographic parameters were not associated with incident SCAF in this cohort of patients with hypertension and diabetes, but without any underlying CVD.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/sangre , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Biomarcadores/sangre , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/sangre , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Anciano , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Standards for preoperative bariatric patient selection include a thorough psychological evaluation. Using patients "red-flagged" during preoperative evaluations, this study aims to identify trends in long-term follow-up and complications to further optimize bariatric patient selection. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team held a case review conference (CRC) to discuss red-flagged patients. A retrospective chart review compared CRC patients to control patients who underwent bariatric surgery in the same interval. Patients under 18 years old, undergoing revisional bariatric surgery, or getting band placement were excluded. High-risk characteristics causing CRC inclusion, preoperative demographics, percent follow-up and other postoperative outcomes were collected up to 5 years postoperatively. If univariate analysis revealed a significant difference between cohorts, multivariable analysis was performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty three patients were red-flagged from 2012 to 2013, of which 79 underwent surgery. After excluding 21 revisions, 3 non-adult patients, and 6 band patients, 55 red-flagged patients were analyzed in addition to 273 control patients. Patient age, sex, initial BMI, ASA, and co-morbidities were similar between groups, though flagged patients underwent RYGB more frequently than control patients. Notably, percent excess BMI loss and percent follow-up (6 months-5 years) were similar. In multivariable analysis, minor complications were more common in flagged patients; and marginal ulcers, endoscopy, and dilation for stenosis were more common in flagged versus control patients who underwent RYGB. Perforation, reoperation, revision, incisional hernia, and internal hernia were statistically similar in both groups, though reoperation was significantly more common in patients with multiple reasons to be flagged compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Bariatric patients deemed high risk for various psychosocial issues have similar follow-up, BMI loss, and major complications compared to controls. High-risk RYGB patients have greater minor complications, warranting additional counseling of high-risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Adolescente , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Whether high-flow vs. low-flow nasal oxygen reduces hypoxaemia for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is currently unknown. In this multicentre trial, 132 patients ASA physical status 3 or higher, BMI > 30 kg.m-2 or with known or suspected obstructive sleep apnoea were randomly allocated to high-flow nasal oxygen up to 60 l.min-1 at 100% FI O2 or low-flow nasal oxygen at 4 l.min-1 . The low-flow nasal oxygen group also received oxygen at 4 l.min-1 through an oxygenating mouthguard, totalling 8 l.min-1 . Primary outcome was hypoxaemia, defined as Sp O2 < 90% regardless of duration. Hypoxaemia occurred in 7.7% (5/65) of patients with high-flow and 9.1% (6/66) with low-flow nasal oxygen (percentage point difference -1.4%, 95%CI -10.9 to 8.0; p = 0.77). Between the groups, there were no significant differences in frequency of hypoxaemic episodes; lowest Sp O2 ; peak transcutaneous carbon dioxide; hypercarbia (transcutaneous carbon dioxide > 2.66 kPa from baseline); requirement of chin lift/jaw thrust; nasopharyngeal airway insertion; bag-mask ventilation; or tracheal intubation. Following adjustment for duration of the procedure, the primary outcome remained non-significant. In high-risk patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, oxygen therapy with high-flow nasal oxygen did not reduce the rate of hypoxaemia, hypercarbia or the need for airway interventions, compared with combined oral and nasal low-flow oxygen.