Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Rockwood III/IV: a retrospective study on clavicular hook plate versus arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button and clavicular hook plate in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation of Rockwood III/IV. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with ACJ dislocation in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 was conducted. The patients were assigned to be treated with arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button (TR group) or clavicular hook plate (HP group). The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data and imaging findings of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 58 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. Compared with HP group, TR group had shorter incision length and less blood loss during operation. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months (mean 15.4 months). At 6 months and 12months postoperatively, compared with HP group, TR group had lower VAS and higher CMS, and the difference was statistically significant. At 12 months postoperatively, compared with HP group, TR group had lower ACJ gap and coracoclavicular joint(CCJ) distance, and the difference was statistically significant.In HP group, there were 3 cases of subacromial impact, 1 case of redislocation, 2 cases of traumatic arthritis and 2 cases of wound infection. There was 1 case of redislocation in TR group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with clavicular hook plate, arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button is minimally invasive, safe and effective in the treatment of ACJ dislocation, and has a good trend in clinical application.

Subacromial osteolysis following hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clavicular hook plates are extensively used in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Subacromial osteolysis is a typical complication following hook plate fixation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence of subacromial osteolysis and analyzed the associated characteristics of subacromial osteolysis to guide surgeons. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched for relevant literature. We screened the literature based on the eligibility criteria, extracted relevant data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Pooled odds ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the chi-squared test and I2 statistics. A meta-regression analysis was performed to explore the potential source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The total pooled incidence of subacromial osteolysis was 29% and the only covariate that could influence the incidence of subacromial osteolysis was the radiological measurement method (P = .017). Patients in the hook plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction group had lower odds of subacromial osteolysis (odds ratio, 2.54, 95% CI 1.54-4.18; P < .001). There were no significant differences in the Constant-Murley scores at the final follow-up between patients with and without subacromial osteolysis (standardized mean difference, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.50 to 0.15; P = .294). CONCLUSIONS: Subacromial osteolysis has a relatively high and variable incidence, and the primary factor influencing the reported incidence is the radiological assessment method. The current analysis suggests coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction as an effective surgical approach for decreasing the incidence of subacromial osteolysis. The presence or absence of subacromial osteolysis did not significantly impact the functional outcomes observed during the final follow-up period.

Comparative clinical outcomes and radiological images of clavicle hook plate versus Scorpion Plate® for unstable distal clavicle fractures.

BACKGROUND: Although various surgical methods are available for unstable distal clavicle fractures, consensus remains lacking on the optimal technique. Therefore, the present retrospective study aimed to compare the clavicle hook plate and Scorpion Plate® in terms of clinical outcomes and radiological findings for unstable distal clavicle fractures. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with unstable distal clavicle fractures who underwent treatment using a clavicle hook plate (Group H; 28 patients) or Scorpion Plate® (Group S; 29 patients) were included in the present study. No patients received additional augmentation and all were followed-up for >1 year (mean follow-up, 28 months). Clinical outcomes were operation time, bleeding volume, complications, range of motion (ROM) at 6 months after surgery and final follow-up, and clinical scores (Constant-Murley score and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score). Radiological outcomes assessed were coracoclavicular distance (CCD), difference in CCD between affected and non-affected sides (ΔCCD), and acromioclavicular subluxation ratio (%ACS) from plain X-rays. The χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare each outcome. RESULTS: Complications were seen in 3 shoulders (10.7%) in Group H. ROM was significantly worse in Group H at 6 months postoperatively, but no significant differences between groups were evident at final follow-up. Moreover, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were seen between groups. In terms of radiological results, Group H showed greater improvement in CCD and ΔCCD than Group S. Further, %ACS was significantly worse in Group S. CONCLUSIONS: The clavicle hook plate allows reconstruction of a more anatomical position than the Scorpion Plate®, but carries a greater risk of complications. Conversely, the Scorpion Plate® has a low risk of complications, but acromioclavicular subluxation remains. However, no significant differences in ROM or clinical outcomes were apparent at final follow-up.

Comparative analysis of tension band wiring and hook plate fixation in ulnar styloid fractures: a focus on fracture type.

INTRODUCTION: Various surgical techniques for ulnar styloid fractures (USFs) fixation have recently been developed, the actual clinical outcomes have not been discussed in detail. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of tension band wiring (TBW) and hook plate fixation in the treatment of USFs and to explore effective management strategies for these fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 109 patients with styloid process fractures from March 2016 to July 2020. Among them, patients aged 21-75 years who required surgical intervention for USFs with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability, with or without accompanying distal radius fracturs (DRFs), were included. The patients were treated with either TBW (group T) or hook plate fixation (group P). The fractures were classified into four types based on their location and complexity. Postoperative assessments were conducted using radiographic analysis to monitor fracture healing. Clinical evaluations, including range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and patient-reported outcomes using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores and the visual analog scale for pain, were performed, at multiple time points up to a year after surgery. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare outcomes across fracture types and treatment methods. RESULTS: Osseous union was achieved in 96% of the patients. Specifically, the time to union in types 3 and 4 fractures was significantly shorter in group P than in group T. Functionally, ROM assessments showed similar flexion-extension in both groups but better pronation-supination in group T. Grip strength and patient-reported outcomes did not show significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: TBW offers slight ROM benefits for type 2 USFs, whereas hook plate fixation provides superior stability for complex types 3 and 4 USFs. Despite the minimal differences in ROM, the enhanced advantages of the hook plate fixation make it the preferred choice for severe fractures, ensuring faster healing.

Comparison of single versus double coracoclavicular loop stabilization technique for the management of unstable distal clavicular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The coracoclavicular (CC) loop stabilization technique is proposed for unstable distal clavicular fractures. This study aims to compare single and double CC loop stabilizations and evaluate differences in functional and radiographic outcomes between them. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial involving 46 patients who sustained unstable distal clavicular fractures between April 2017 and 2019. The participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the single CC loop stabilization group (n = 23) or the double CC loop stabilization group (n = 23). We assessed their Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), and pain level. Additionally, we recorded data on time to union, CC distance, and any complications. RESULTS: The single CC loop group demonstrated a shorter operative time and significantly higher Constant score than the double CC loop group at 1 month (77.32 ± 5.65 vs. 71.91 ± 8.33; p = 0.016) and 3 months (86.17 ± 4.05 vs. 81.13 ± 6.34; p = 0.009) postoperatively. However, there was no differences in the ASES score, time to union or CC distance restoration between two groups. Implant irritation was observed in the double CC loop group (26.1%), but there were no cases requiring revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both single and double CC loop stabilization demonstrated favorable outcomes, including a high union rate and minimal complications. Single CC loop stabilization showed slightly better early functional outcomes, reduced implant-related irritation, and shorter operative times.

Optimizing hook implantation angle of the clavicular hook plate: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: While Clavicle hook plates have demonstrated favorable results regarding bone and shoulder function, their design can potentially lead to complications due to pressure concentration at the plate's tip. This study aims to investigate the impact of different hook implantation angles on the contact surface area between the hook plate and acromion, with the goal of minimizing mismatch and maximizing contact surface area. METHODS: Twenty soft shoulder cadavers were included in the study, and the contact surface area of the hook plate was measured in different positions based on the hook implantation angle. RESULTS: The results showed variations in compatibility, width, and length of the contact surface area depending on the hook implantation angle and the medial or lateral row placement. The lateral row generally demonstrated superior compatibility (84.0% vs 46.67%, p-value < 0.001), with a broader contact area (3.55 ± 0.08 mm vs 3.09 ± 0.10 mm, p-value = 0.004) and a longer contact area (7.36 ± 0.19 mm vs 5.10 ± 0.23 mm, p-value < 0.001) at specific angles. A detailed analysis of the lateral position revealed that the zero angle of implantation resulted in the greatest contact surface area, measuring 3.91 ± 0.70 mm in width (p value = 0.083) and 8.85 ± 1.24 mm in length (p value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Placing the hook laterally and at the zero position according to the hook implantation angle can maximize contact surface area, may reduce stress concentration, and minimize complications in hook plate fixation. Further research and consideration of anatomical variations are warranted to refine the placement technique and enhance patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V evidence.

Hook plate fixation of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures results in satisfactory patient-reported outcomes but complications and revisions are high.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of distal clavicle fractures Neer type II is challenging. A gold standard has not yet been established, thus various surgical procedures have been described. The purpose of this study is to report the radiological and clinical outcomes using hook plate fixation in Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 53 patients who underwent hook plate fixation between December 2009 and December 2019 with ≥ 2 years of follow-up. Patients with preexisting pathologies or concomitant injuries of the ipsilateral shoulder were excluded. Pre- and postoperative coracoclavicular distance (CCD), bony union and patient-reported outcomes were collected, including the Constant Score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). Complications and revisions were recorded. RESULTS: At a mean final follow-up of 6.2 years, mean SSV was 91.0% (range, 20-100) and mean CS was 80.9 points (range, 25-99). The mean preoperative CCD was 19.0 mm (range, 5.7-31.8), the mean postoperative CCD was 8.2 mm (range, 4.4-12.2) and the mean CCD following hardware removal was 9.7 mm (range, 4.7-18.8). The loss of reduction following hardware removal was statistically significant (P = 0.007). Eleven (20.8%) patients had complications, with 5 cases of deep or superficial infection (9.4%), four non-unions (7.5%), one periosteosynthetic fracture, one postoperative seroma, one implant failure and one symptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis (all 1.9%). A total of 10 patients (18.9%) underwent revision surgery at a mean of 113 (range, 7-631) days. CONCLUSION: Medium-term patient-reported outcomes for hook plate fixation of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures are satisfactory; however, one in five patients suffers a complication with the majority of them requiring revision surgery.

The Results of Hook Plate Fixation for Palmar Fracture Dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to present the clinical outcomes of the dorsal plating technique for palmar fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. This plating technique minimizes dissection and interference with the finger extensor mechanism. METHODS: We treated seven patients (with a mean age of 39.1 years) with dorsal hook plates for palmar fracture dislocations of the PIP joint between April 2018 and August 2022. The little finger was affected in five patients, and ring finger was affected in two. The mean time to surgery was 5.6 days, and the postoperative follow-up period was seven months. On the second postoperative day, all patients were allowed active motion of both the PIP and the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints. Simultaneously, DIP blocking exercises were started to prevent adhesion of the extensor mechanism. RESULTS: The mean active flexion and extension of the PIP joint was 105° and -4°, respectively, whereas those of the DIP joint were 65° and 4°. No patient experienced extension lag in the DIP joint. The mean total active motion (TAM) was 273°, and the %TAM was 96%. The grip strength of the affected hand averaged 90% of that of the unaffected hand. The mean numerical rating scale for pain was 0.3 points, and the mean Hand20 score was 5.1 points. No complications were observed; two patients underwent implant removal at their request. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that this hook plate technique, which minimizes interference with the finger extension mechanism, is an effective surgical procedure that allows patients to tolerate early range of motion exercises and obtain satisfactory clinical outcomes in both the PIP and DIP joints. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Treatment options for acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular dislocations: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations have been treated with numerous surgical techniques over the years. The purpose of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials to quantitatively define the optimal treatment for AC dislocations requiring operative treatment. METHODS: A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Randomized controlled trials comparing 1 of 10 treatments for acute Rockwood type III-V AC dislocations-nonoperative treatment, Kirschner wire fixation (KW), coracoclavicular screw fixation (Scr), hook plate (HP), open coracoclavicular cortical button (CBO), arthroscopic coracoclavicular cortical button (CBA), ≥2 coracoclavicular cortical buttons (CB2), isolated graft reconstruction (GR), cortical button with graft augmentation (CB-GR), and coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular fixation (AC)-were included. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach to NMA, with statistical analysis performed using the R program. Treatment options were ranked using the P-score, which estimates the likelihood that the investigated treatment is the ideal method for an optimal result in each outcome measure on a scale from 0 to 1. RESULTS: Of 5362 reviewed studies, 26 met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1581 patients included in the NMA. AC, CB-GR, GR, CB2, CBA, and CBO demonstrated superiority over HP, Scr, KW, and nonoperative treatment at final follow-up for the Constant-Murley score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, with AC and CB-GR showing the highest P-scores for the Constant-Murley score (0.957 and 0.781, respectively) and GR and CBO showing the highest P-scores for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (0.896 and 0.750, respectively). GR had the highest P-score for the visual analog scale score (0.986). HP, CB2, CB-GR, AC, CBA, and CBO demonstrated superiority in the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and recurrence at final follow-up, with HP and CB2 having the highest P-scores for the CCD (0.798 and 0.757, respectively) and with GR and CB-GR having the highest P-scores for recurrence (0.880 and 0.855, respectively). KW and Scr showed the shortest operative times (P-scores of 0.917 and 0.810, respectively), whereas GR and CBA showed the longest operative times (P-scores of 0.120 and 0.097, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although there are multiple fixation options for acute Rockwood type III-V AC dislocations, adding AC fixation or graft augmentation likely improves functional outcomes and decreases the CCD and recurrence rate at final follow-up-at the expense of longer operative times.

Biomechanical analysis of tibial plateau posterolateral fracture fragment fixation and introduction of a lateral tibia plateau hook plate system.

BACKGROUND: Fixing the posterolateral fragments of tibial plateau fractures has been challenging owing to potential neurovascular injuries and fibular head blocks. Several surgical approaches and fixation techniques have been reported, with distinct limitations. We propose a novel lateral tibia plateau hook plate system and compare its biomechanical stability with other fixation methods. METHODS: Twenty-four synthetic tibia models were simulated to present posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. These models were randomly assigned to three groups. Group A models were fixed with the lateral tibia plateau hook plate system, Group B with variable-angle anterolateral locking compression plates, and Group C with direct posterior buttress plates. The models' biomechanical stability was evaluated using static (gradually increased axial compressive loads) and fatigue (cyclically loaded from 100 to 600 N for 2000 cycles each) tests. RESULTS: Groups A and C models exhibited comparable axial stiffness, subsidence load, failure load, and displacement in the static test. Group A model exhibited higher subsidence and failure loads than Group B model. Groups A and C models exhibited comparable displacement at 100 N cyclic loading in the fatigue test. Group C model was more stable at higher loads. Group C model endured the highest subsidence cycle numbers, followed by Groups A and B models. CONCLUSIONS: The lateral tibia plateau hook plate system provided similar static biomechanical stability as the direct posterior buttress plates and comparable dynamic stability under limited axial loading. This system is a potential posterolateral treatment choice owing to its convenience and safety, in treating tibia plateau fractures.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of hook plates and superior plates in the treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Non-operative treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures results in high non-union and yet there is no consensus on superior treatment modality. While there are a number of different techniques available for fixation, hook plate (HP) has been used most commonly. A number of modern techniques, including superior plate (SP), have shown less complications but equivocal union rate and shoulder function. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the outcome of HP fixation with superior plate in surgical fixation of displaced distal clavicle fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A review of the online databases MEDLINE and Embase was conducted on 15 January 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies reporting union rate, complications and shoulder function were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 42 studies eligible for inclusion with a total of 1,261 patients. These included 17 hook-plate case series (n = 573), 18 superior plate case series, of which 6 used SP alone (n = 223) and 12 SP and simultaneous CCLR case series (n = 189), and 7 studies comparing HP and SP (n = 276). The overall complication rate was significantly higher with HP when compared to SP [(32.7% vs 12.7%; OR 6.31 (95% CI: 2.67-14.91)]. The overall union rates in the case series appeared comparable in the current SR; HP 96.4%, SP 96.9% and SP with simultaneous CCLR 97.9%. Shoulder function was most commonly assessed using CM score and the mean ranged from 83.8 to 97.2 in HP, 89 to 98 in SP group and 90.6 to 97.6 in SP with CCLR. Meta-analysis of CM score failed to show a significant difference for HP versus SP (pooled weighted mean difference was 2.67 (95% CI: - 0.09 to 5.43) with a trend to favour SP fixation. CONCLUSION: The current review has demonstrated that HP, SP alone or with CCLR all offer excellent union rate and appear to provide comparative functional outcomes. However, HP is associated with significantly higher complication rates.

Operative management of lateral third clavicle fractures: a comparison of internal fixation methods.

PURPOSE: Clavicle fractures in the lateral third are associated with more complications. Various methods of internal fixation exist; however, there is no consensus which should be employed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of these various methods in our regional trauma unit. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent internal fixation of a lateral clavicle fracture in our unit between 1 August 2014 and 31 July 2019. Demographic and outcome data were extracted from electronic care records and imaging systems. RESULTS: In total, 44 patients were included, with the following demographics: mean age 26 years, 63.6% male, 65.9% high-energy injury, 68.2% Neer II fracture. The following operations were performed: hook plate fixation (HPF) = 10, locking plate fixation (LPF) = 16, coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR) = 12, and LPF + CCLR = 6. Patients having LPF had a significantly larger post-operative coracoclavicular distance (7.6 mm vs 13.5 mm, p < 0.01), and trends towards a lesser decrease in CCD (9.9 mm vs 12.6 mm, p = 0.37) and incomplete ACJ reduction (50.0% vs 89.3%, p = 0.11). There was a significantly higher re-operation rate after HPF (100% vs 23.5%, p < 0.01). There were no differences in time to union or duration of follow-up. CONCLUSION: In our unit there is no clearly favoured method of internal fixation of lateral clavicle fractures. When LPF is used, there should be consideration of concomitant CCLR. The high rate of re-operation after HPF is concordant with previous research.

Clinical outcomes for grades III-V acromioclavicular dislocations favor double-button fixation compared to clavicle hook plate fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of both randomized controlled and observational studies comparing double-button suture fixation to hook plate fixation for types III-IV acromioclavicular joint dislocation. METHODS: Systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, including all levels 1-3 studies from 2000 to 2022. Clinical outcome scores, range of motion, and complications were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's ROB2 tool and ROBINs-I tool. MINORS and modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) were used to assess within study quality. The GRADE system was used to assess the overall quality of the body of evidence. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ2 and I2 statistics. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Three of the four included LOE II and eleven of the LOE III studies had a high risk of bias. Study quality was considered poor and fair for 67% by MINORS criteria and 93% for CMS criteria. The pooled estimate (SMD 0.662) for all clinical outcomes was statistically significant and in favor of button repair (p = 0.0001). The pooled estimate (SMD 0.662) for all VAS pain scores was statistically significant, again in favor of button repair (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated significantly better outcomes of button repair for acute ACJ dislocations when compared to clavicle hook plate. Button repair is also associated with a 2.2 times lower risk for complications. However, risk of bias is high, and study quality within and between studies was low. These results, therefore, must be viewed with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; systematic review and meta-analysis.

Risk factors of loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with a hook plate.

BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular joint fixation using a hook plate is effective for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. However, several studies have reported some complications including loss of reduction after surgery for acromioclavicular joint dislocation. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation surgery using a hook plate. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that assessed 118 patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation, who were diagnosed between March 2013 and January 2019 and underwent surgical treatment using the hook plate (reduction loss group: n = 38; maintenance group: n = 80). The mean follow-up period was 29.9 months (range, 24-40 months). We assessed the range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), visual analog scale score for pain, and a subjective shoulder value. Radiological assessment of coracoid clavicular distance was performed. The risk factors of reduction loss were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Age (p = 0.049), sex (female, p = 0.03, odds ratio OR = 4.81), Rockwood type V (p = 0.049, OR = 2.20), and time from injury to surgery > 7 days (p = 0.018, OR = 2.59) were statistically significant factors in the reduction loss group. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes for range of motion, ASES, subjective shoulder value, and visual analog scale scores between the two groups. In the radiological results, preoperative coracoid clavicular distance (p = 0.039) and ratio (p = 0.001), and over-reduction (p = 0.023, OR = 0.40) were significantly different between the two groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the female sex (p = 0.037, OR = 5.88), a time from injury to surgery > 7 days (p = 0.019, OR = 3.36), and the preoperative coracoid clavicular displacement ratio of the injured shoulder (p < 0.001, OR = 1.03) as risk factors associated with reduction loss following surgery using a hook plate for acromioclavicular dislocation. CONCLUSION: A delayed timing of surgery > 7 days, preoperative coracoid clavicular displacement ratio of the injured shoulder, and female sex were identified as risk factors for loss of reduction after surgery using a hook plate for acromioclavicular joint dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; retrospective comparison; treatment study.

Open reduction and internal fixation of the tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament: which is better, a hollow lag screw combined with a gasket or a homemade hook plate?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical results of homemade hook plates and hollow lag screws combined with spacers in the treatment of posterior cruciate tibial ligament avulsion fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective clinical cohort study that included 64 patients with PCL tibial avulsion fractures. Thirty-two of them were fixed with a homemade hook plate (hook plate group), and 32 were fixed with a hollow lag screen combined with a gasket (hollow lag screen group). By reviewing the medical record data and follow-up results, the operation time, postoperative drainage, fracture healing time, surgical complications, knee mobility, recovery of joint function, and whether postoperative gastrocnemius muscle strength changed in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: All patients had successful wound and fracture healing. No adverse events, such as bone nonunion, infection, wound haematoma, or joint stiffness, occurred in either group. There were no patients with decreased gastrocnemius muscle strength in either group. Internal fixation failure occurred in 2 cases in the hollow lag screen group but not in the hook plate group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, postoperative drainage, fracture healing time, knee mobility at the last follow-up, or Lysholm score. CONCLUSION: It is safe and effective to use a homemade hook plate to fix PCL tibial avulsion fractures through an inverted L-shaped posterior medial approach. A homemade hook plate may have potential advantages over a hollow lag screen combined with gasket fixation.

Operative treatment outcomes of anterior sternoclavicular joint dislocation using two experimental methods - an acromioclavicular joint hook plate versus a locking plate: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the intraoperative and early postoperative clinical outcomes of using an acromioclavicular joint hook plate (AJHP) versus a locking plate (LP) in the treatment of anterior sternoclavicular joint dislocation. METHODS: Seventeen patients with anterior sternoclavicular joint dislocation were retrospectively analyzed from May 2014 to September 2019. Six patients were surgically treated with an AJHP, and 11 were surgically treated with an LP. Five male and one female patients composed the AJHP group, and nine male and two female patients composed the LP group. The mean age of all patients was 49.5 years. RESULTS: Reduction and fixation were performed with AJHP or LP in all 17 patients. The mean operative blood loss, operative time, and length of incision in the AJHP group were significantly better than those in the LP group. Shoulder girdle movement of the AJHP group was significantly better than that of the LP group. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that AJHP facilitated glenohumeral joint motion, reduced the risk of rupture of mediastinal structures, required a shorter incision, and had lesser blood loss and a shorter duration of operation compared with LP. However, some deficiencies require further improvement.

Comparative analysis of arthroscopic-assisted Tight-rope technique and clavicular hook plate fixation in the treatment of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic-assisted fixation using the Tight-rope system and clavicular hook plate fixation in the treatment of Neer IIB distal clavicle fractures. METHODS: We enrolled 48 consecutive patients with Neer IIB distal clavicle fractures who were treated at our institution from February 2016 and August 2020. These patients were divided into 2 groups based on the fixation method (16 cases with Tight-rope system and 32 cases with clavicular hook plate), and demographics and clinical characteristics of patients in different groups were compared. RESULTS: All 48 patients had functional outcome scores of the affected shoulder available at a mean of 23.8 ± 5.1 months, and there was a statistically significant improvement in the constant score, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the end of follow-up (p < 0.001 respectively). However, the smaller length of skin incision, less estimated blood loss and shorter hospital stay were detected in the Tight-rope technique group patients than those of clavicular hook plate group patients (p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the constant score, ASES score and VAS score were significantly improved in the Tight-rope technique group patients than those of clavicular hook plate group patients (p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both Tight-rope technique and clavicular hook plate fixation can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological results in the treatment of distal clavicular Neer IIB fracture. However, arthroscopic-assisted fixation using the Tight-rope technique showed better results in terms of length of hospital stay, surgical trauma, clinical scores, and diagnose and treat concomitant glenohumeral pathologies. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III, Case-control study Retrospective comparative study.

Effect of subacromial erosion shape on rotator cuff and clinical outcomes after hook plate fixation in type 5 acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical fixation using hook plates is widely used in the treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and shape of subacromial erosions after removal of the hook plate in type 5 AC joint dislocations. Further, we evaluated the effect of the shape of the subacromial erosion on the rotator cuff. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who underwent hook plate fixation for type 5 AC joint dislocations at our hospital between December 2010 and December 2018. Patients with a follow-up of at least 1 year were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the final follow-up Constant-Murley, Korean Shoulder, and visual analog scores. To ensure that the appropriate reduction was well maintained, the coracoclavicular distances of the injured and contralateral sides were evaluated at the last follow-up. Computed tomography was performed to investigate the presence and shape of the subacromial erosion after hook plate removal at 4 months after surgery. Ultrasonography was performed to investigate the presence of rotator cuff lesions at the last follow-up. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between groups divided according to the presence and types of subacromial erosions. RESULTS: Subacromial erosion was observed in 60% of patients (18/30): 13, 2, and 3 simple groove, cave, and marginal protrusion types, respectively. Four patients showed reduction loss at the final follow-up. There were no significant differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between the groups with and without subacromial erosion. Moreover, there were no significant differences between groups according to the types of subacromial erosion. There were no rotator cuff lesions, such as partial tears, in the injured shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: Hook plate fixation may induce subacromial erosions. However, the subacromial erosions caused by the hook plate did not affect the clinical outcomes of type 5 AC joint dislocations. Moreover, regardless of its shape, the subacromial erosion did not affect the clinical outcomes nor cause rotator cuff lesions after plate removal.

Comparison of open reduction and fixation with hook plate and modified closed reduction and fixation with tightrope loop plate for treatment of rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of open reduction and hook plate fixation (ORHPF) and modified TightRope loop plate fixation (MTRLPF) in the treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Data on 71 patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation who underwent either ORHPF (n = 39) or MTRLPF (n = 32) between January 2016 and October 2019 were extracted and analyzed. Baseline data at injury were compared to evaluate the balance. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, Constant-Murley score and visual analog scores (VAS) score at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation were compared; further, at 12 months coracoclavicular distance and related complications were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Both groups did not differ for any baseline data. At 1 and 3 months after operation, MTRLPF group exhibited a significantly better performance than the ORHPF group in VAS (1 month: 2.4 ± 1.8 vs 3.0 ± 1.7; 3 months: 1.2 ± 1.4 vs 1.8 ± 1.6), Constant-Murley (1 month: 75.2 ± 11.2 vs 63.8 ± 13.7; 3 months: 81.4 ± 9.8 vs 75.8 ± 10.6), DASH (1 month: 33.6 ± 6.8 vs 40.6 ± 6.1; 3 months: 21.2 ± 7.4 vs 25.6 ± 6.6). At 6 months, only Constant-Murley remained marginally significant (p = 0.048). At 12 months, no statistical difference was observed for any outcome variable (all P > 0.05 for VAS, Constant-Murley and DASH), coracoclavicular distance (12.7 ± 1.6 mm vs 12.2 ± 1.6 mm; P = 0.374), or overall complication rate (P = 0.763). CONCLUSIONS: For Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation, both methods can achieve satisfactory 1-year results, but modified minimally invasive TightRope treatment is more advantageous in early functional recovery at 1 and 3-month follow-ups.

Does coracoclavicular augmentation additional to hook plate fixation provide benefits in acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation? A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is a common shoulder injury. In treating acute unstable ACJ dislocation, a hook plate (HP) is a straightforward and popular option for ensuring proper reduction and rigid fixation while promoting AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament healing. Surgeons typically remove the HP to prevent subacromial impingement and acromial osteolysis; however, concerns about redislocation after implant removal remain. Therefore, additional CC augmentation may be helpful in combination with HP fixation. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the outcomes and complications of HP fixation with or without additional CC augmentation for acute unstable ACJ dislocation. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for relevant case-control studies. The primary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures; the secondary outcomes were pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), CC distance (CCD), and complications. Continuous data were assessed using weighted standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and dichotomous data were evaluated with Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (ORs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: We analyzed one randomized control trial and four case-control studies comparing HP fixation with or without CC augmentation. A total of 474 patients with Rockwood type III or V ACJ dislocation were included. We found no differences in Constant-Murley score (SMD, - 0.58, 95% CI - 1.41 to 0.26; P = 0.18), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (SMD, 0.21, 95% CI - 0.10 to 0.52; P = 0.19), University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale score (SMD, - 0.02, 95% CI - 1.27 to 1.23; P = 0.97), or VAS pain score (SMD, 0.36, 95% CI - 0.16 to 0.88; P = 0.17) between groups. The CC augmentation group had lower odds of osteolysis (OR, 0.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.74; P = 0.01) and a shorter CCD (SMD, - 0.29, 95% CI - 0.57 to - 0.01; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: HP fixation with CC augmentation is preferable for acute unstable ACJ dislocations. Although CC augmentation did not provide additional benefits related to functional outcomes or pain, it resulted in greater reduction maintenance after implant removal and a 73% lower risk of acromial osteolysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ( CRD42021271118 ).