RESUMEN
SUMMARYImplant-associated infections (IAIs) pose serious threats to patients and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These infections may be difficult to diagnose due, in part, to biofilm formation on device surfaces, and because even when microbes are found, their clinical significance may be unclear. Despite recent advances in laboratory testing, IAIs remain a diagnostic challenge. From a therapeutic standpoint, many IAIs currently require device removal and prolonged courses of antimicrobial therapy to effect a cure. Therefore, making an accurate diagnosis, defining both the presence of infection and the involved microorganisms, is paramount. The sensitivity of standard microbial culture for IAI diagnosis varies depending on the type of IAI, the specimen analyzed, and the culture technique(s) used. Although IAI-specific culture-based diagnostics have been described, the challenge of culture-negative IAIs remains. Given this, molecular assays, including both nucleic acid amplification tests and next-generation sequencing-based assays, have been used. In this review, an overview of these challenging infections is presented, as well as an approach to their diagnosis from a microbiologic perspective.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Microbiológicas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/genética , Laboratorios Clínicos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Information on infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Cutibacterium spp. is limited and new Duke-ISCVID criteria have not yet been properly assessed. We examined clinical characteristics, outcomes and performance of diagnostic tests for Cutibacterium valvular and cardiac implantable electronic device-related IE (CIED-IE). METHODS: Data corresponding to all episodes of Cutibacterium IE recorded from 2008 to 2023 in a prospective national cohort including 46 Spanish hospitals were examined. Possible IE cases were reassessed using the new criteria. The sensitivity of blood cultures, valvular and CIED cultures, and PCR of the 16SrRNA gene and sequencing (16SPCR) was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 67/6,692 (1%) episodes of IE caused by Cutibacterium spp., 85% affecting men. Of these, 50 were valve-related (45 prosthetic, 5 native) and 17 CIED-related. The new criteria identified 8 additional cases and reclassified 15 as definite IE. Intracardiac complications (abscess, pseudoaneurysm, perforation or intracardiac fistula) occurred in 23/50 (46%) valvular IE episodes, leading to 18% mortality, and up to 40% mortality if surgery was indicated but could not be performed. All CIED-IE cases underwent device removal and no deaths were recorded. Positive diagnosis rates for blood cultures, valve/device cultures and 16SPCR were 52%, 70% and 82%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cutibacterium IE is a rare yet potentially life-threatening condition that warrants a high index of suspicion in men with endovascular prosthetic material. The new Duke-ISCVID criteria and molecular techniques are useful for its diagnosis. Considering a significant complication rate, cardiac surgery and removal of CIEDs play a key role in reducing mortality.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Infections associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are a multifactorial disease that leads to increased morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyze patient-, disease- and treatment-related characteristics including microbiological and bacterial spectrum according to survival status and to identify risk factors for 1- and 3-year mortality in patients with local and systemic CIED infection. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from patients with CIED-related local or systemic infection undergoing successful transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Survival status as well as incidence and cause of rehospitalization were recorded. Microbiology and antibiotics used as first-line therapy were compared according to mortality. Independent risk factors for 1- and 3-year mortality were determined. RESULTS: Data from 243 Patients were analyzed. In-hospital mortality was 2.5%. Mortality rates at 30 days, 1- and 3 years were 4.1%, 18.1% and 30%, respectively. Seventy-four (30.5%) patients had systemic bacterial infection. Independent risk factors for 1-year mortality included age (OR 1.05 [1.01-1.10], p = 0.014), NT-proBNP at admission (OR 4.18 [1.81-9.65], p = 0.001), new onset or worsened tricuspid regurgitation after TLE (OR 6.04 [1.58-23.02], p = 0.009), and systemic infection (OR 2.76 [1.08-7.03], p = 0.034), whereas systemic infection was no longer an independent risk factor for 3-year mortality. Staphylococcus aureus was found in 18.1% of patients who survived and in 25% of those who died, p = 0.092. There was a high proportion of methicillin-resistant strains among coagulase-negative staphylococci (16.5%) compared to Staphylococcus aureus (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Staphylococci are the most common causative germs of CIED-infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci showing higher resistance rates to antibiotics. The independent risk factors for increased long-term mortality could contribute to individual risk stratification and well-founded treatment decisions in clinical routine. Especially the role of tricuspid regurgitation as a complication after TLE should be investigated in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Desfibriladores Implantables , Remoción de Dispositivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Marcapaso Artificial , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Anciano , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Tiempo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality without appropriate treatment. It can present as incisional infection, pocket infection, systemic CIED infection, or occult bacteraemia. Complete percutaneous CIED extraction (excepted in case of incisional infection) and appropriate antibiotic therapy are the two main pillars of therapy. Device reimplantation, if needed, should be delayed sufficiently to allow control of the infection. Here, we address the differences in prognosis according to the clinical scenario and the different treatment options.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardiopatías , Marcapaso Artificial , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Electrónica , Humanos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality making the identification of the causative organism critical. The vast majority of CIED infections are caused by Staphylococcal species. CIED infections associated with atypical pathogens are rare and have not been systematically investigated. The objective of this study is to characterize the clinical course, management and outcome in patients with CIED infection secondary to atypical pathogens. METHODS: Medical records of all patients who underwent CIED system extraction at the University of Chicago Medical Center between January 2010 and November 2020 were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with CIED infection. Demographic, clinical, infection-related and outcome data were collected. CIED infections were divided into typical and atypical groups based on the pathogens isolated. RESULTS: Among 356 CIED extraction procedures, 130 (37%) were performed for CIED infection. Atypical pathogens were found in 5.4% (n = 7) and included Pantoea species (n = 2), Kocuria species (n = 1), Cutibacterium acnes (n = 1), Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum (n = 1), Corynebacterium striatum (n = 1), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 1), and Pseudozyma ahidis (n = 1). All patients with atypical CIED infections were successfully treated with total system removal and tailored antibiotic therapy. There were no infection-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: CIED infections with atypical pathogens were rare and associated with good outcome if diagnosed early and treated with total system removal and tailored antimicrobial therapy. Atypical pathogens cultured from blood, tissue or hardware in patients with CIED infection should be considered pathogens and not contaminants.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sonicate fluid (SF), a solution derived from vortexing and sonication of explanted cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), is a higher-yield specimen compared with swabs or tissues for culture-based detection of microorganisms associated with CIED infection. Despite this, SF culture fails to identify a causative organism in ~50% of cases. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 16S ribosomal RNA gene (rRNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/sequencing of SF and compare it with that of SF culture. METHODS: We identified 322 SF specimens from extracted CIEDs and reviewed clinical data for each patient. Subjects were classified as having or not having CIED infection. Cases were subcategorized as culture negative if no significant growth was reported from SF cultures and as culture positive if an organism was detected above predefined thresholds. 16S rRNA PCR/sequencing was performed, with the organisms identified reported according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines for sequence data interpretation. RESULTS: A total of 278 SF samples corresponded to infected cases, of which 160 were culture positive and 118 culture negative. The remaining 44 were from noninfected cases, of which 2 were culture positive. Compared with SF culture, the sensitivity of 16S rRNA PCR/sequencing was higher (64% vs 57.5%, P = .003). 16S rRNA PCR/sequencing detected a potential pathogen in 28 of 118 culture-negative cases, identifying staphylococci in the majority (18/28). CONCLUSIONS: 16S rRNA PCR/sequencing has higher sensitivity to detect bacteria in SF from extracted CIEDs than does SF culture.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Prótesis e Implantes , Bacterias/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Electrónica , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are associated with a high mortality. Our aim was to identify key predictors of survival in patients with CIED infections as to be able to detect high-risk patients and possibly affect modifiable factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this observational study, we collected data from 277 patients with CIED infections treated in our department between 2001 and 2017; predictors of survival were evaluated. The median time since the last CIED procedure was 0.83 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.25-3.01), median time since initial CIED implant was 4.79 years (IQR: 0.90-11.0 years). Survival at 30 days was 94.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.3-97.5) and survival at 1 year was 80.9% (CI: 76.4-85.7). Age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, CI: 1.01-1.09; P = .009), end stage renal disease (ESRD) with dialysis (OR: 5.14, CI: 1.87-14.11; P = .001), positive blood cultures (OR: 2.19, CI: 1.08-4.45; P = .030), and thrombocytopenia (OR: 2.3, CI, 1.03-5.15; P = .042) were identified as predictors of death within 1 year of treatment of CIED infection. CONCLUSION: Patients with CIED infection with prior ESRD with dialysis or preoperative thrombocytopenia are at an increased risk of 1-year mortality. We suggest that these patients be evaluated critically and resources be allocated to these patients more liberally. A greater understanding of the role of platelets in immunity may improve treatment of advanced infection in the future.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Trombocitopenia/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Trombocitopenia/diagnóstico , Trombocitopenia/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: Treatment of patients with systemic cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection with large lead vegetations is challenging and associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. To avoid complications from open surgical extraction, a novel approach with percutaneous aspiration of large vegetations prior to transvenous lead extraction was instituted. The results of this treatment concept were retrospectively analysed in this multicentre study. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and one patients [mean age 68.2 ± 13.1 (30-92) years] were treated in four centres for endovascular CIED infection with large lead vegetations. Mean lead vegetation size was 30.7 ± 13.5 mm. Two hundred and forty-seven leads were targeted for extraction (170 pacemaker leads, 77 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads). Mean lead implant duration was 81.7 (1-254) months. The transcatheter aspiration system with a specialized long venous drainage cannula and a funnel-shaped tip was based on a veno-venous extracorporeal circuit with an in-line filter. The aspiration of vegetations showed complete procedural success in 94.0% (n = 95), partial success in 5.0% (n = 5). Three major complications (3.0%) were encountered. Complete procedural success (per lead) of the subsequently performed transvenous lead extraction procedure was 99.2% (n = 245). Thirty-day mortality was 3.0% (n = 3). Five patients (5.0%) died in the further course on Days 51, 54, 68, 134, and 182 post-procedure (septic complications: n = 4; heart failure: n = 1). CONCLUSION: The percutaneous aspiration procedure is highly effective and is associated with a low complication profile. The aspiration of vegetations immediately prior and during the lead extraction procedure may avoid septic embolization into the pulmonary circulation. This may potentially lead to a long-term survival benefit.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Remoción de Dispositivos , Marcapaso Artificial , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Leadless pacemakers may provide a safe and attractive pacing option to patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. We describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with a recent CIED infection undergoing Micra implant attempt. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with prior CIED infection and device explant with Micra implant within 30 days, were identified from the Micra post approval registry. Procedure characteristics and outcomes were summarized. A total of 105 patients with prior CIED infection underwent Micra implant attempt ≤30 days from prior system explant (84 [80%] pacemakers and 13 [12%] ICD/CRT-D). All system components were explanted in 93% of patients and explant occurred a median of 6 days before Micra implant, with 37% occurring on the day of Micra implant. Micra was successfully implanted in 99% patients, mean follow-up duration was 8.5 ± 7.1 months (range 0-28.5). The majority of patients (91%) received IV antibiotics preimplant, while 42% of patients received IV antibiotics postprocedure. The median length of hospitalization following Micra implant was 2 days (IQR, 1-7). During follow-up, two patients died from sepsis and four patients required system upgrade, of which two patients received Micra to provide temporary pacing support. There were no Micra devices explanted due to infection. CONCLUSION: Implantation of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker is safe and feasible in patients with a recent CIED infection. No recurrent infections that required Micra device removal were seen. Leadless pacemakers appear to be a safe pacing alternative for patients with CIED infection who undergo extraction.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/mortalidad , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/mortalidad , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: Abandoned leads are often linked to complications during lead extraction, prompting pre-emptive extraction if leads become non-functional. We examined their influence on complications when extracted for device-related infection. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients undergoing lead extraction for device-related infection from 2006 to 2017 in our hospital were included. The primary endpoint was major complications. Out of 500 patients, 141 had abandoned leads, of whom 75% had only one abandoned lead. Median cumulative implant times were 24.2 (interquartile range 15.6-38.2) and 11.6 (5.6-17.4), respectively years with or without abandoned leads. All leads were extracted only with a femoral approach in 50.4% of patients. Mechanical rotational tools were introduced in 2014 and used in 22.2% of cases and replacing laser sheaths that were used in 5% of patients. Major complications occurred in 0.7% of patients with abandoned leads compared with 1.7% of patients with only active leads (P = 0.679). Failure to completely remove all leads was 14.9% and 6.4%, respectively with or without abandoned leads (P = 0.003), and clinical failure was 6.4% and 2.2% (P = 0.028), respectively. Procedural failure dropped to 9.2% and 5.7% (P = 0.37), respectively after the introduction of mechanical rotational tools. The only independent predictor of procedural and clinical failure in multivariate analysis was the cumulative implant duration. CONCLUSION: Despite longer implant times, patients with abandoned leads did not have more major complications during lead extraction. Therefore, preventive extraction of non-functional leads to avoid complications at a later stage is not warranted.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Marcapaso Artificial , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Anciano , Electrodos Implantados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Falla de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection rates are increasing. Worldwide compliance and disparities to published guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and management of these conditions are not well elucidated. The purpose of this survey, therefore, was to clarify these issues through an inquiry to arrhythmia-related associations and societies worldwide. METHODS AND RESULTS: A questionnaire comprising 15 questions related to CIED infections was distributed among members of seven arrhythmia societies worldwide. A total of 234 centres in 62 countries reported implantation rates of which 159 (68.0%) performed more than 200 device implantations per year and 14 (6.0%) performed fewer than 50 implantations per year. The reported rates of CIED infections for 2017 were ≤2% in 78.7% of the centres, while the infection rates exceeded 5% in 7.8% of the centres. Preventive measures for CIED infection differed from published recommendations and varied among different regions mainly in terms of pocket irrigation and administering post-operative antimicrobial therapy the use of which was reported by 39.9% and 44% of the respondents, respectively. Antibacterial envelopes were used by 37.7% of the respondents in selected circumstances. In terms of pocket infection management, 62% of the respondents applied complete system removal as an initial step. Diagnostic pocket needle aspiration and pocket surgical debridement were reported by 15.8% and 11.8% of centres, respectively. CONCLUSION: Clinical practices for prevention and management of CIED do not fully comply with current recommendations and demonstrate considerable regional disparities. Further education and programmes for improved implementation of guidelines are mandatory.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Prevención Secundaria , Antibacterianos/clasificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiopatías/terapia , Humanos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Prevención Secundaria/normas , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIMS: We aimed at investigating the feasibility and outcome of Micra implant in patients who have previously undergone transvenous lead extraction (TLE), in comparison to naïve patients implanted with the same device. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (65 males, 78.31%; 77.27 ± 9.96 years) underwent Micra implant at our centre. The entire cohort was divided between 'post-extraction' (Group 1) and naïve patients (Group 2). In 23 of 83 patients (20 males, 86.96%; 73.83 ± 10.29 years), Micra was implanted after TLE. Indication to TLE was an infection in 15 patients (65.21%), leads malfunction in four (17.39%), superior vena cava syndrome in three (13.05%), and severe tricuspid regurgitation in one case (4.35%). The implant procedure was successful in all patients and no device-related events occurred at follow-up (median: 18 months; interquartile range: 1-24). No differences were observed between groups in fluoroscopy time (13.88 ± 10.98 min vs. 13.15 ± 6.64 min, P = 0.45), single device delivery (Group 1 vs. Group 2: 69.56% vs. 55%, P = 0.22), electrical performance at implant and at 12-month follow-up (Group 1 vs. Group 2: pacing threshold 0.48 ± 0.05 V/0.24 ms vs. 0.56 ± 0.25 V/0.24 ms, P = 0.70; impedance 640 ± 148.83 Ohm vs. 583.43 ± 99.7 Ohm, P = 0.27; and R wave amplitude 10.33 ± 2.88 mV vs. 12.62 ± 5.31 mV, P = 0.40). A non-apical site of implant was achievable in the majority of cases (72.3%) without differences among groups (78.26% vs. 70%; P = 0.42). CONCLUSION: Micra implant is an effective and safe procedure in patients still requiring a ventricular pacing after TLE, with similar electrical performance and outcome compared with naïve patients at long-term follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Microelectrodos , Marcapaso Artificial , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Anciano , Catéteres Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Marcapaso Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Reoperación/métodos , TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) may be necessary due to infective and noninfective indications. We aim to identify predictors of 30-day mortality and risk factors between infective versus noninfective groups and systemic versus local infection subgroups. METHODS: A total of 925 TLEs between October 2000 and December 2016 were prospectively collected and dichotomized (infective group n = 505 vs noninfective group n = 420 and systemic infection n = 164 vs local infection n = 341). RESULTS: All-cause major complication including deaths was significantly higher (5.1%, n = 26 vs 1.2%, n = 5, P = 0.001) as well as 30-day mortality (4.0%, n = 20 vs 0.2%, n = 1, P < 0.001) in the infective group compared to the noninfective group. Both subgroups (systemic vs local infection) were balanced for demographics. All-cause major complication including deaths was significantly higher (9.1%, n = 15 vs 3.2%, n = 11, P = 0.008) as well as all-cause 30-day mortality (7.9%, n = 13 vs 2.1%, n = 7, P = 0.003) in the systemic infection subgroup compared to the local infection subgroup. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing TLE for infective indications are at greater risk of 30-day all-cause mortality compared to noninfective patients. Patients undergoing TLE for systemic infective indications are at greater risk of 30-day all-cause mortality compared to patients with local infection. Renal impairment, systemic infection, and elevated preprocedure C-reactive protein are independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TLE for an infective indication.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Cardiac implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) encompasses a range of clinical syndromes, including valvular, device lead, and bloodstream infections. However, accurately diagnosing CIED-IE remains challenging owing in part to diverse clinical presentations, lack of standardized definition, and variations in guideline recommendations. Furthermore, current diagnostic modalities, such as transesophageal echocardiography and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography have limited sensitivity and specificity, further contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. This can potentially result in complications and unnecessary costs associated with inappropriate device extraction. Six hypothetical clinical cases that exemplify the diverse manifestations of CIED-IE are addressed herein. Through these cases, we highlight the importance of optimizing diagnostic accuracy and stewardship, understanding different pathogen-specific risks for bloodstream infections, guiding appropriate device extraction, and preventing CIED-IE, all while addressing key knowledge gaps. This review both informs clinicians and underscores crucial areas for future investigation, thereby shedding light on this complex and challenging syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Marcapaso Artificial , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Sepsis , Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Endocarditis/diagnóstico , Endocarditis/etiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/complicacionesRESUMEN
With the expanding use of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy, intravascular device infections are becoming more common. In the case of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) infections requiring extraction for bacterial clearance, there remains no standard method to deliver temporary ICD therapy following device removal. We present a case of persistent bacteremia complicated by monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) electrical storm where biventricular ICD system extraction was performed and a temporary transvenous dual-coil lead with an externalized ICD generator was used to treat VT episodes prior to the re-implantation of a new permanent system. This case demonstrates the utility of a temporary externalized transvenous ICD system in the successful detection and pace-termination of VT, thereby reducing episodes of painful and potentially harmful external defibrillator shocks during the treatment of CIED infection.
RESUMEN
Background. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is routinely used in cardiac electrophysiology and catheterization labs. It plays a vital role in understanding cardiac anatomy, procedural planning, and early identification of complications. In this review, we describe the utility of ICE for procedures in the electrophysiology lab, including atrial fibrillation ablation, left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation, and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) extraction. Intracardiac echocardiography also helps in the identification of complications such as pericardial effusion, pulmonary vein stenosis, and left atrial appendage thrombus. Compared with traditional echocardiographic modalities such as transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), ICE has equivalent image quality, requires less sedation, and possesses no risk of esophageal injury. The disadvantages of ICE include a learning curve and necessity for central vascular access.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) is a long-term antibiotic strategy at times applied when an indicated surgical management of infective endocarditis (IE) is not possible. Our aim was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients having received SAT for IE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study at Strasbourg University Hospital, France between January 2020 and May 2023. We reviewed all medical files taken into consideration at weekly meetings of the local Multidisciplinary Endocarditis Team (MET) during the study period. We included patients having received SAT following the MET evaluation. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at most recent follow-up. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality at 3 and 6 months, infection relapse, and tolerance issues attributed to SAT. RESULTS: The MET considered 251 patients during the study time, among whom 22 (9 %) had received SAT. Mean age was 77.2 ± 12.3 years. Patients were highly comorbid with a mean Charlson index score of 6.6 ± 2.5. Main indication for SAT was surgery indicated but not performed or an infected device not removed (20/22). Fourteen patients had prosthetic valve IE, including 9 TAVIs. Six patients had IE affecting cardiac implantable electronic devices. Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci were the main bacteria involved (6/22 each). Median follow-up time was 249 days (IQR 95-457 days). Mortality at most recent follow-up was 23 % (5/22). Three patients (14 %) presented tolerance issues attributed to SAT, and two patients suffered late infectious relapse. CONCLUSION: Mortality at most recent follow-up was low and tolerance issues were rare for patients under SAT, which might be a palliative approach to consider when optimal surgery or device removal is not possible.
Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis/cirugía , Recurrencia , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
AIMS: After extraction of an infected cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) in a pacemaker-dependent patient, a temporary pacemaker wire may be required for long periods during antibiotic treatment. Loss of capture and under sensing are commonly observed over time with temporary pacemaker wires, and patient mobility is restricted. The use of an externalized permanent active-fixation pacemaker lead connected to a permanent pacemaker generator for temporary pacing may be beneficial because of improved lead stability, and greater patient mobility and comfort. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a temporary permanent pacemaker (TPPM) system in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction due to CIED infection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 47 patients who underwent lead extraction due to CIED infection over a 2-year period at our centre, 23 were pacemaker dependent and underwent TPPM implantation. A permanent pacemaker lead was implanted in the right ventricle via the internal jugular vein and connected to a TPPM generator, which was secured externally at the base of the neck. The TPPM was used for a mean of 19.4 ± 11.9 days (median 18 days, range 3-45 days), without loss of capture or sensing failure in any patient. Twelve of 23 patients were discharged home or to a nursing facility with the TPPM until completion of antibiotic treatment and re-implantation of a new permanent pacemaker. CONCLUSION: External TPPMs are safe and effective in patients requiring long-term pacing after infected CIED removal.
Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Electrodos Implantados/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/prevención & control , Marcapaso Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Anciano , California/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Seguridad de Equipos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
We present the first case of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection due to Neisseria cinerea in a 64-year-old woman from Panama. She had a history of splenectomy, aortic valve stenosis requiring transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and permanent pacemaker placement. She presented with relapsing N. cinerea bacteremia over a 3-month period. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a lead vegetation in the superior vena cava. She was successfully treated with pacemaker removal and 2 weeks of IV antibiotic therapy. N. cinerea is an aerobic gram-negative commensal diplococcus typically found in the human nasopharynx. Infection in humans is rare with few case reports in the literature.