How-I-do-it: laparoscopic intragastric submucosal dissection (LISD) for gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction early lesions.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic intragastric submucosal dissection (LISD) is a novel approach to the resection of gastric lesion that are not amenable to conventional endoscopic approaches. The technique permits favourable access to lesions situated at the cardia and angular notch of the stomach, enables en-bloc resection of large areas of tissue, and can prevent the need of formal gastrectomy or oesophagectomy in selected patients. METHODS: All cases were deemed suitable for LISD by a multidisciplinary team panel following endoscopic assessment (using white light enhancement, chromoendoscopy and magnification endoscopy) that was integrated when needed with EUS, CT scan or PET scan. The surgical technique consisted in a 3-port laparoscopic approach; after establishment of pneumoperitoneum, three gastrotomies were performed to enable port insertion into the stomach. Following establishment of stable pneumogastrium, the area of interest was identified, submucosal hyaluronic acid injection performed to provide a cushion in the plane of dissection, and the excision area was circumferentially marked with cautery. Resection was completed using cautery hook, along a plane parallel to the muscolaris propria. After the specimen was extracted in a retrieval bag, intracorporeal single layer running suture closure of gastrotomies was performed. The abdominal wall closed by layers and tap block performed along with local anaesthetic injection on skin incision. Measures were taken to ensure correct orientation of resected specimens prior to fixation. RESULTS: During the study period that spans from 2014 and 2022, a total of 11 patients underwent LISD for limited lesions of the stomach, 10 were located at gastro-oesophageal junction and one at the angular incisura. Four patients were female, seven males. The median age was 74 (46-79) years. R0 resection rate was 54.5%. Mean operative time was 109 min with very low blood loss (10 ml). Mortality rate was 0%, no immediate major complications (Grade II-V Clavien Dindo), including haemorrhage or perforation, occurred in these cases. Two patients developed dysphagia later that was successfully treated with endoscopic balloon dilatations. Median hospital stay was 3 days and median oral intake was on day 1 post-procedural. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic intragastric submucosal dissection is shown to be a safe and effective intervention for the treatment of early gastric cancers in selected patients having undergone deemed not amenable for endoscopic submucosal resection for their technically challenging location. Its application can serve as route to avoid formal surgery and the associated morbidity.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery is a feasible treatment procedure for intraluminal gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors compared to endoscopic intragastric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach is an ideal procedure if the gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are located in the extraluminal stomach. When the tumor is located in the intraluminal stomach, two minimally invasive surgical procedures involving laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) or endoscopic intragastric surgery (EIGS) are frequently performed. To date, there have been no comparative studies of LECS and EIGS in patients with intraluminal gastric GISTs regarding short-term and long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and feasibility of LECS and EIGS in patients with intraluminal gastric GISTs. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of 46 consecutive patients with intraluminal gastric GISTs who underwent minimally invasive surgery. LECS (n = 21) was performed between 2013 and 2015 and EIGS (n = 26) was performed between 2001 and 2013. RESULTS: The overall incidence of perioperative complications was significantly higher in the EIGS group than in the LECS group (40 vs 4.8%; P = 0.006). In the EIGS group, three patients with intraoperative gastric mucosal injury were followed-up throughout surgical repair (12%). An esophageal tear was found in one patient during oral removal of tumor (4%). Postoperative gastric hemorrhage occurred in three patients (12%) and superficial surgical site infection was observed in three patients (12%). In the LECS group, anastomotic leakage requiring additional drainage was observed in one patient (4.8%). EIGS had less favorable results regarding median time to resumption of first oral intake (2 vs 1 days; P = 0.005). Two of 46 patients (4.3%), including one patient who underwent LECS and one patient who underwent EIGS developed recurrence. No cause-specific deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: LECS is a feasible and safe procedure for intraluminal gastric GISTs with regard to both short-term surgical and long-term oncological outcomes. Registration number: UMIN000026631.

Long-term outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic intragastric surgery in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors at the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: The treatment options for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GITSs) at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) are controversial. There have been reports on enucleation for EGJ GISTs in order to avoid gastrectomy. But the number of patients is too small, or the follow-up period is too short to evaluate it. The purpose of this study was to review our experience of 59 patients with EGJ GISTs treated by enucleation by percutaneous endoscopic intragastric surgery (PEIGS) and assess the clinical outcomes. METHODS: PEIGS is performed as described below. Access ports are placed through the abdominal wall and the anterior wall of the stomach. Through the access ports, an endoscope and surgical instruments are inserted into the gastric lumen and tumor enucleation and closure of the defect are carried out. In this study, 59 patients with EGJ GISTs treated by PEIGS between 2005 and 2013 were enrolled. Their hospital records were reviewed, and follow-up data for 8 years were collected to analyze the outcomes. RESULTS: En-bloc enucleation was achieved without tumor rupture in all. Average operation time was 172.3 min. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 (one localized peritonitis, one bleeding, and one surgical site infection). Average tumor size was 35.6 mm. Pathological findings confirmed negative margin in all specimens. The maximum follow-up period was 101 months. Multiple liver metastases were detected in two patients (at 12 and 29 months). The survival rate was 100 %. The disease-free rate was 98.3 % at 12 months and 96.6 % at 29 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As far as the short- and long-term outcomes of our experience are reviewed, PEIGS seems as curative as other aggressive resection methods such as proximal gastrectomy. Tumor enucleation by PEIGS, offering a chance to preserve the stomach, can be a preferable option in carefully selected patients with EGJ GISTs, when performed by a skilled surgeon.

Needlescopic intragastric surgery facilitated by newly developed 2mm instruments.

BACKGROUND: Intragastric surgery is a percutaneous endoluminal surgery in the stomach aimed at resection of tumors located at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). We developed needlescopic intragastric surgery performed via 2 mm, 2 mm, and 5 mm ports (PEIGS-225). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In cooperation with Niti-On Co., Ltd. we developed a series of 2 mm instruments including grasping forceps, a cannula, a laparoscope, an electrocautery, scissors, and a needle holder. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: Two 2 mm trocars and a 5 mm one are inserted into the gastric lumen percutaneously. Intragastric procedures are performed by the instruments brought through those three ports. The specimen is extracted via the esophageal-oral route. The defect in the gastroesophageal wall is closed by hand-suture. After the intragastric procedure, the 5 mm stab wound on the gastric wall is closed by hand-suture, while the 2 mm wounds are left untreated. PATIENTS: Between March and August 2015 PEIGS-225 was performed in five patients. RESULTS: There was no operative conversion. The mean operation time was 96 minutes. There were no perioperative complications. Pathological findings indicated that the margin was negative in all cases. CONCLUSION: Needlescopic intragasric surgery performed via the smallest access (2 mm, 2 mm, 5 mm) is enabled by the 2 mm instruments developed by us.

Intragastric laparoscopic surgery: An option for gastric lesions not resectable by endoscopy.

Gastric mucosal and submucosal lesions can be resected by endoscopy, laparoscopy or open surgery. Operative methods have varied depending on the location, endophytic growth and size of the lesion. Interest in minimally invasive surgery has increased and many surgeons are attempting laparoscopic approaches, especially in lesions of the stomach near the esophagogastric junction not amendable to endoscopic removal, because conventional surgery can produce stenosis and distort the postoperative anatomy, and increase morbimortality. We report our experience with laparoscopic intragastric surgery in 3 consecutive patients, with no complications. Laparoscopic intragastric surgery extends the surgeons' armamentarium to resect complex gastric lesions, while offering patients the benefits of minimal access surgery.

Surgical tips and tricks for laparoscopic intragastric surgery for submucosal tumors relative to the esophagogastric junction.

Recent reports have described the practicality of laparoscopic intragastric surgery (l-IGS) as an alternative for resecting submucosal tumors (SMTs) near the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), where excision using an exogastric approach would be difficult. However, even using IGS to perform a full-thickness resection of SMTs that are in or extremely close to the EGJ is very difficult to do safely and avoid disrupting or causing stenosis of the EGJ, without advanced experience. This study retrospectively examined the usefulness of l-IGS for gastric SMTs located in or extremely close to the EGJ. Fourteen patients with gastric SMTs < 2 cm of the EGJ and underwent l-IGS were eligible for this study. We examined the tumor location, operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, degree of deformation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, perioperative complications, and recurrence. Furthermore, we compared patients with tumors in the EGJ with those with tumors near the EGJ and patients in whom three-port l-IGS was performed with those who underwent single-incision laparoscopic surgery. The average tumor size, operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, and postoperative hospitalization of the 14 patients were 30.9 ± 21.3 mm, 125.2 ± 31.1 min, 30.7 ± 103.3 mL, and 9.2 ± 3.1 d, respectively. No differences in these parameters according to the type of l-IGS or tumor location were observed. All patients underwent l-IGS without complications and were free from EGJ deformation or esophagitis. We believe that l-IGS is useful for gastric SMTs located < 2 cm of the EGJ as it can be safely performed for difficult tumor locations and does not cause deformation of the EGJ.

Percutaneous endoscopic intragastric surgery for gastric metastases of renal cell carcinoma: A case report.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of percutaneous endoscopic intragastric surgery (PEIGS) for gastric metastases from other organs. A 70-year-old male with a history of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was referred to our department for the treatment of gastric metastasis of RCC. Partial gastrectomy was performed using single-incision PEIGS. Two years after the surgery, a follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a tumor located on the middle greater curvature of the stomach. The diagnosis was metastatic renal cell carcinoma, prompting a similar surgery. No recurrence was observed after the second surgery. PEIGS is a minimally invasive option for the treatment of metastatic gastric tumors.

Trans-umbilical Intragastric Surgery Using Two Alexis Wound Retractors for a Large Trichobezoar in a Four-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report.

Trichobezoars are difficult to remove endoscopically and often require surgery. We performed trans-umbilical intragastric surgery using two Alexis wound retractors with successful results in a pediatric patient with a trichobezoar. This method is a safe and cosmetically favorable option for the removal of large trichobezoars and does not require special techniques or instruments. It also contributes to the reduction of postoperative complications such as wound infection and intra-abdominal abscess.

A case of a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the esophagogastric junction successfully treated by laparoscopic intragastric resection.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Laparoscopic wedge resection has been widely performed for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, because GISTs in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) are prone to deformity and postoperative functional disorders, laparoscopic resection is technically very difficult and rarely reported. Herein, we report a case of a GIST in the EGJ successfully treated by laparoscopic intragastric surgery (IGS). CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old man with a GIST, which was intragastric growth type, 2.5 cm in diameter, located in the EGJ, and confirmed by upper gastrointestinal endoscope and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. We successfully performed IGS and the patient was discharged without complications. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Using laparoscopic wedge resection by exogastric approach, it is problematic to resect a gastric SMT located at the EGJ because of the difficulty in viewing the surgical field and additional concerns of deformation of the EGJ. We suppose IGS as a suitable method for such tumors. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic IGS for gastric GIST was useful in terms of safety and convenience even though the tumor was in the ECJ.

Hybrid approach with laparoscopic wall-inversion surgery and single-incision intragastric surgery for intraluminal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report.

Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for intraluminal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) leads to excessive resection of normal gastric wall. We report a case of GIST around the cardia successfully treated with full-thickness partial resection using a hybrid approach of laparoscopic surgery and single-incision intragastric surgery (SIIGS). A 69-year-old woman had a 5 cm intraluminal GIST at the posterior wall around the cardia. Submucosal injection of glycerin and indigo carmine was performed with transoral endoscopy. Circumferential seromuscular incision followed by placement of seromuscular sutures to invert the lesion into the stomach was performed under laparoscopy. By SIIGS, resection of the inverted mucosa and retrieval of the tumor were completed. A hybrid approach consisting of laparoscopic wall-inversion surgery and SIIGS was useful for intraluminal GIST and may expand the indications for laparoscopic wall-inversion surgery by removing size limitations.

Results of laparoscopic intragastric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Technological and operative advancements have allowed laparoscopic intragastric surgery (LIGS) to be applied in the treatment of superficial gastric or submucosal lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes following LIGS. METHODS: From 2000 to 2013, 25 LIGSs were performed for superficial gastric lesions. Clinical records were reviewed retrospectively for peri-operative course and long-term outcomes with particular attention to the oncological follow-up for patients with malignant lesions. RESULTS: Nineteen (76%) lesions were located close to the EGJ, three (12%) in the lesser curvature, two (8%) in the posterior wall and one (4%) in the prepyloric-antral region. A multiport technique was used in 15 (60%) patients and a single-access approach in 10 (40%) patients. The median operative time was 140 (50-210) minutes. No conversion to open or conventional laparoscopic surgery was needed. Mortality was nil, and severe morbidity occurred in one (4%) patient. The median length of stay was 6 (3-10) days. Indications of LIGS were adenocarcinoma in 11 (44%) patients, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in 6 (24%) patients and benign lesions in eight (32%) patients. En bloc resection was obtained in 24 (96%) patients with R0 margins in 23 (92%) patients. After a median follow-up of 76 (26-171) months, recurrence was detected in 4 (36%) patients with advanced malignant adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: LIGS provides an interesting alternative to major gastric and EGJ resection when endoscopic resection is not suitable for highly selected patients with superficial gastric lesions.

Intragastric single-port surgery (IGS) for gastric endophytic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): A novel surgical treatment.

BACKGROUND: Intragastric surgery with a single incision has been performed for several diseases, such as gastric tumors[1] and pancreatic pseudocyst[2], safety, feasibility and potential benefits of which have been reported in previous relevant studies[3]. METHODS: The video shows a 65-year-old man with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, preoperative abdominal CT scan and endoscopy suggested an endophytic tumor located in gastric corpus, suggesting gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Intragastric single-port surgery (IGS) was indicated. RESULTS: Under general anesthesia, patient was placed in supine position. Surgeons stood on the right side of the patient. After a 2.5cm transverse incision was made on left upper abdominal wall, gastric anterior wall was exteriorized and fixed to the skin incision. Single-port device was inserted inside the stomach after anterior gastric wall was opened. Next, laparoscope was introduced into gastric cavity and identified the location of tumor. Full thickness resection of the tumor was performed by using linear stapler, then stapler line was embedded with continuous sutures. Finally, after specimen and single-port device removal, the stomach incision was closed extracorporeally. The operation time was 112 minutes. Final pathology confirmed GIST (4.5cm) with negative margins and patient discharged after 4 days, without postoperative complications. In 1-year follow-up time, without recurrence or death. CONCLUSION: IGS is safe and effective for gastric endophytic GIST resection, which not only preserves all advantages of conventional laparoscopic operation, but also includes other benefits like obviating the need of abdominal cavity exploration, potential reduction of risk of neoplasm seeding, and offering good postoperative cosmetic result.

Intragastric cystogastrostomy in a 4-year-old child with a pancreatic pseudocyst: A novel technique.

Pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) often occur in association with acute pancreatitis or pancreatic trauma and are uncommon disorders in children. PPs require operative interventions in case they do not disappear spontaneously. There are several interventional treatments, and laparoscopic or endoscopic treatments have been recently reported as a less invasive procedure. However, these procedures are sometimes difficult to perform for small children. We describe a novel intragastric cystogastrostomy with mini-laparotomy for a 4-year-old female child. She presented with a PP caused by trauma. The PP failed to resolve after 6 weeks and we performed open cystogastrostomy. We made mini-laparotomy and inserted a wound retractor into the stomach and expanded both the abdominal and the gastric walls. This procedure created a good operative field and enabled intragastric cystogastrostomy even in small children. There were no complications. At 10-month postsurgery, a follow-up computed tomography showed no recurrence of PP. This novel intragastric cystogastrostomy for PP, which includes the insertion of a wound retractor, is a safe, minimally invasive, and technically feasible approach for younger children with PP. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to describe the intragastric cystogastrostomy with a wound retractor.

Laparoscopic Intragastric Surgery for Treating Early Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although there is an increasing number of studies on laparoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC), as of 2018 no standardized strategy exists. We reviewed available literature dealing with laparoscopic intragastric (intraluminal) surgery (LIGS) conducted for patients with EGC to better define indications, benefits and limitations of this particular minimally invasive technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and ResearchGate were the search engines investigated. Only LIGS for EGC was entertained; studies conducted for other gastric diseases were excluded. Suitable articles written in all languages were included in the review. RESULTS: As of 2018, we found 19 studies dealing with LIGS for EGC: studies on 72 humans and four pigs were identified. Among 72 human participants, there were 59 mucosal, five submucosal and one subserosal cancer. CONCLUSION: Based on our review, LIGS appears as a cogent option to endoscopic resection for treating superficial EGC.

Percutaneous endoscopic intragastric surgery: an organ preserving approach to submucosal tumors at esophagogastric junction.

As an organ preserving option in the treatment of submucosal tumor found at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), percutaneous endoscopic intragastric surgery (PEIGS) plays an important role, while it is not commonly performed and there have been very few reports on this unique operation. The current authors have been performing PEIGS since 1993 and have reported on its short- and long-term outcomes from one of the world largest series. Herein its confusing terminology is discussed and techniques of three different types of PEIGS (original PEIGS, single incision PEIGS, and needlescopic PEIGS) are precisely described. Although reports on clinical outcomes of PEIGS have been rarely published, both short-term and long-term outcomes seem acceptable, as far as we review our own experiences and the past literatures. PEIGS needs to be accessed by the data from larger series or RCT to be further justified and spread for the patients with submucosal tumors at EGJ to salvage their stomach.

Endoluminal resection of gastric intestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

Endoluminal surgery, the combination of flexible endoscopy and percutaneous transgastric laparoscopy, has expanded the role of minimally invasive surgery in treating foregut diseases. This imaginative technique blends the skills of endoscopist and laparoscopist. The stomach is well-suited for this technique as it is an expandable, large volume organ readily accessible to a flexible endoscope, and the relative ease of placing endoscopically or laparoscopically-guided percutaneous, transgastric ports provides access for laparoscopic instrumentation. The resection of gastric stromal tumors provides one of the few opportunities to integrate flexible endoscopy and laparoscopy. Proper training in the appropriate indications to utilize endoluminal techniques and familiarity with the multiple modifications from the original intragastric techniques described nearly a decade ago will allow surgeons to approach small, predominately endoluminal gastric stromal tumors with low malignant potential located in the cardia, along the posterior gastric wall, near the gastroesophageal junction or proximal to the pylorus.

[Transgastric laparo-endoscopic approach for difficult access lesions. Experimental mode]. / Abordaje laparo-endoscópico transgástrico para lesiones de difícil acceso. Modelo experimental.

BACKGROUND: Gastric neoplasms can be treated by laparoscopy in a safe and efficient way. Some lesions are not accessible to laparoscopic surgery due to their location. A transgastric approach is proposed as an alternative. OBJECTIVE: Show the results with the application of an endoscopic laparotomy in an animal model that maintains functional anatomy, to resect the posterior gastric neoplasms of the stomach wall, close to the cardia and pre-pyloric region. METHODS: The laparo-endoscopic technique for resection of gastric neoplasms located in the posterior wall was developed in twelve pigs at the Hospital General Gea González from May to December 2011. TECHNIQUE: An endoscopy was performed to establish the site of insertion of intragastric trocars. Three gastrotomies were made in the anterior wall; under endoscopic and laparoscopic vision the trocars were inserted. The stomach was insufflated with CO2. The lesion was resected maintaining a 20 mm circumferencial margin. The gastrotomies were sutured. The statistic analysis was made with t Student and exact Fisher tests. RESULTS: One-hundred percent of resections were achieved in an average time of 102.33 minutes (± 4.50). Two complications and no transoperatory deceases occurred. DISCUSSION: The technique we describe allows an appropriate approach to gastric lesions located in the posterior wall, those near to the esophagogastric juntion and the prepiloric region, due to the excellent exposure managed by working inside the stomach with a laparoscopic vision and the two intragastric movile ports. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic transgastric approach is feasible and safe for the resection of gastric neoplasms located in the posterior wall, those close to the esophago-gastric junction, and the pre-pyloric region.

Antecedentes: las neoplasias gástricas pueden tratarse de forma segura y eficaz mediante laparoscopia. Debido a su localización algunas lesiones son inaccesibles mediante cirugía laparoscópica, como alternativa se propone el abordaje transgástrico. Objetivo: exponer los resultados con la aplicación de una técnica laparo-endoscópica en un modelo animal que mantenga funcional la anatomía, para resecar neoplasias gástricas de la pared posterior del estómago, próximas al cardias y a la región pre-pilórica. Material y métodos: el estudio se efectuó entre los meses de mayo a diciembre de 2011en el Hospital General Gea González y consistió en experimentar en 12 cerdos la técnica laparo-endoscópica para resección de neoplasias gástricas de la pared posterior. La inserción de los trócares intragástricos se realizó mediante endoscopia. Se efectuaron tres gastrotomías en la pared anterior y con visión endoscópica los trócares se introdujeron con el auxilio laparoscópico. El estómago se insufló con CO2. La lesión se resecó manteniendo un margen circunferencial de 20 mm, se suturaron las gastrotomías, se utilizaron la prueba de t de Student y la prueba exacta de Fisher para el análisis estadístico. Resultados: todas las resecciones fueron exitosas y se efectuaron en un tiempo promedio de 102.33 minutos (± 4.50), hubo dos complicaciones y ninguna defunción transoperatoria. Conclusiones: el abordaje laparoscópico transgástrico es factible y seguro para resecar neoplasias de la pared posterior del estómago, próximas a la unión esófago-gástrica y área prepilórica.

New surgical approach for gastric bezoar: "hybrid access surgery" combined intragastric and single port surgery.

Regarding the removal of a gastric bezoar, laparoscopic surgery was performed and it was shown that the laparoscopic approach is safe and feasible. However, the laparoscopic method has the risk of intraabdominal contamination, when the gastric bezoar is retrieved from the gastric lumen in the peritoneal cavity. We developed and applied a new procedure for the removal of the gastric bezoar using one surgical glove and two wound retractors as a fashion of intragastric single port surgery. Herein we present this new minimal invasive procedure, so named "hybrid access surgery" which involves the use of existing devices and overcomes the weakness of laparoscopic removal of the gastric bezoar. Our new procedure, combining the concept of intragastric and single port access, is acceptable and feasible to retrieve the gastric bezoar. In the future, this procedure may be one of the alternative procedures for retrieving gastric bezoar even when it is incarcerated in the pylorus.