Pre-operative atrial fibrillation and early right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular failure (RVF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known for its deleterious effects on cardiac function and hemodynamics. The association of pre-operative AF with the risk of early post-LVAD RVF has not been well described. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was performed through April, 9 2021. Cohort studies comparing the risk of post-operative RVF and/or need for right ventricular assist device (RVAD) after LVAD in patients with or without AF were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 statistic were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the analysis. Post-operative RVF was reported in 5 studies (1,841 patients) and RVAD use was reported in 4 studies (1,355 patients). There is a non-significant trend toward a higher risk of post-operative RVF in the AF group (pooled OR=1.25, 95%CI=0.99-1.58). No significant association between AF and RVAD use is noted (pooled OR=1.17, 95%CI=0.82-1.66). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative AF is not significantly associated with higher risks of post-operative RVF and RVAD use after LVAD implantation, although the trend toward higher post-operative RVF is observed in patients with pre-operative AF. Additional research using a larger study population is warranted to better understand the association of pre-operative AF and the development of post-LVAD RVF.

"Durable left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation in The Old and The New World".

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for end-stage heart failure patients without contraindications. However, limited donor availability and long wait times have created a need for left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) to be used as a bridge to transplantation in appropriately selected patients. Improvements in LVAD technology have resulted in improved short- and long-term outcomes, further supporting the use of these devices for a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) indication. LVAD utilization as BTT exhibits notable disparities worldwide, mainly due to variations in organ availability, allocation policies, and financial constraints. Although Europe has experienced a consistent increase in the use of LVAD for this purpose, the United Network for Organ Sharing 2018 policy amendment resulted in a significant reduction in the number of LVADs used for BTT in the US. To overcome this issue, modifications in the US allocation policy to consider factors such as days on device support, age, and type of complications may be necessary to potentially increase implantation rates.The authors provide an overview comparing the current state of heart transplantation in the US and Europe, with a particular focus on how distinct allocation policies and organ availability impact medical practices. Additionally, the review will examine critical aspects ranging from patient selection and pre-implantation optimization to post-transplant outcomes.

Intracardiac Shunt Reversal and Early Right Ventricular Failure after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a common complication that occurs after a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is implanted. We report an interesting case of severe and refractory hypoxia during the early postoperative period after HeartMate3 (HM3) (Abbott Laboratories, Lake Forest, IL) implantation resulting in the unmasking of a right-to-left intracardiac shunt through a patent foramen ovale (PFO), triggered by early RVF. Importantly, the patient had a small left-to-right shunt after receiving a left-sided Impella 5.5 micro-axial pump (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) pre-LVAD implantation. We observed improved hypoxia but worsening RVF after percutaneous PFO closure, necessitating right-sided mechanical circulatory support. We outline potential reasons for the significant PFO-related shunting seen after HM3 implantation, but not after Impella 5.5 placement. Uncertainty exists regarding the approach to a PFO in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. We propose an approach based on existing literature.

Transcatheter valvular therapies in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation are commonly encountered in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). These valvular heart conditions either develop prior to CF-LVAD implantation or are induced by the pump itself. They can all have significant detrimental effects on patients' survival and quality of life. With the improved durability of CF-LVADs and the overall rise in their volume of implants, an increasing number of patients will likely require a valvular heart intervention at some point during CF-LVAD therapy. However, these patients are often considered poor reoperative candidates. In this context, percutaneous approaches have emerged as an attractive "off-label" option for this patient population. Recent data show promising results, with high device success rates and rapid symptomatic improvements. However, the occurrence of distinct complications such as device migration, valve thrombosis or hemolysis remain of concern. In this review, we will present the pathophysiology of valvular heart disease in the setting of CF-LVAD support to help us understand the underlying rationale of these potential complications. We will then outline the current recommendations for the management of valvular heart disease in patients with CF-LVAD and discuss their limitations. Lastly, we will summarize the evidence related to transcatheter heart valve interventions in this patient population.

Virtual Simulated Implantation of an Adult-Sized Left Ventricular Assist Device in a Pediatric Patient.

There is very limited experience with simulated virtual implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) to assess device fitness in pediatric patients. In this clinical vignette, we report the case of a 9-year-old male patient with dilated cardiomyopathy who underwent successful placement of an LVAD after virtual simulated implantation was performed. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Right Atrial Compression From Biodebris Associated With Long-Term Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Biodebris surrounding HVAD (Medtronic) intrapericardial centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device outflow cannulas is common and appears to accumulate over time. We recently encountered 2 patients on long-term HVAD support with right atrial compression from such biodebris, prompting a review of our institution's HVAD cohort to better understand this phenomenon. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

A multidisciplinary approach for the emergency care of patients with left ventricular assist devices: A practical guide.

The use of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge-to-transplantation or destination therapy to support cardiac function in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) is increasing in all developed countries. However, the expertise needed to implant and manage patients referred for LVAD treatment is limited to a few reference centers, which are often located far from the patient's home. Although patients undergoing LVAD implantation should be permanently referred to the LVAD center for the management and follow-up of the device also after implantation, they would refer to the local healthcare service for routine assistance and urgent health issues related to the device or generic devices. Therefore, every clinician, from a bigger to a smaller center, should be prepared to manage LVAD carriers and the possible risks associated with LVAD management. Particularly, emergency treatment of patients with LVAD differs slightly from conventional emergency protocols and requires specific knowledge and a multidisciplinary approach to avoid ineffective treatment or dangerous consequences. This review aims to provide a standard protocol for managing emergency and urgency in patients with LVAD, elucidating the role of each healthcare professional and emphasizing the importance of collaboration between the emergency department, in-hospital ward, and LVAD reference center, as well as algorithms designed to ensure timely, adequate, and effective treatment to patients with LVAD.

Critical Care Management of Surgical Patients with Heart Failure or Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Brief Overview.

Patients with heart failure, including those with implanted left ventricular assist devices, continue to increase in number. When they require noncardiac surgery, cardiac critical care expertise may not be immediately available to assist. This review serves to provide surgeons and surgical intensivists with a brief overview of the management of this patient population and common clinical scenarios and complications.

Embolized Hydrophilic Coating Polymers Found in Left Ventricular Assist Device Apical Core Specimen.

Left ventricular assist devices are increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure. Gross and histologic evaluation of myocardial apical core specimens, extracted during device placement, can provide important insights. Herein, we describe a case of hydrophilic polymer embolization with associated foreign-body giant cell reaction discovered during apical core evaluation. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Fusion of Bovine Tissue Aortic Valve Leaflets in a Patient With Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Patients with both a prosthetic aortic valve and prolonged left ventricular assist device support can develop rapid deterioration of their valve prosthesis. In patients with myocardial recovery who are undergoing explantation of their ventricular assist device, preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of the valve prosthesis should be performed to ensure adequate function. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Outcomes of COVID-19 in heart failure, LVAD, and heart transplant patients in an advanced heart failure practice.

Background: Patients with heart failure face increased morbidity and mortality when infected with COVID-19. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with Heart Failure (HF), Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs), or Heart Transplants (HTx) diagnosed with COVID-19 within an advanced HF practice. Methods: Out of 2635 patients followed, 96 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 2020 and January 2021. Median hospital length of stay (LOS), requirement for mechanical ventilation (MV), and mortality rate were evaluated. Results: The distribution of COVID-19 among the 96 patients was: HF = 43 (45 %), LVAD = 16 (17 %) and HTx = 37 (38 %). Among 43 HF patients, 5 (12 %) died, 18 (42 %) required hospitalization with an LOS of 7 days, 5 (12 %) required ICU and 4 (9 %) required MV. Of the 16 LVAD patients, 2 (13 %) died, 8 (50 %) required hospitalization with an LOS of 11 days, 3 (19 %) required ICU and 3 (19 %) required MV. Among 37 HTx patients, 7 (19 %) died, 23 (62 %) required hospitalization with an LOS of 9 days, 6 (16 %) required ICU and 6 (16 %) required MV. Conclusion: This report is among the first to describe the impact of COVID-19 on a diverse advanced HF practice. It highlights the risks associated with COVID-19 faced by the HF, LVAD and HTx patients. A 90-day mortality rate of 19 % with HTx patients acquiring COVID-19 is ominous as is a mortality rate of 12 % each for HF and LVAD patients. This clinical impact should serve as a reminder of unique challenges with these populations.

Assessment of U.S. heart transplantation equity as a function of race: Observational analyses of the OPTN database.

Background: Racial disparities in heart transplantation (HT) outcomes are suspected but uncertain. The additional impact of a recent change in donor allocation on disparities in HT in the United States (US) is unknown. We hypothesize racial disparities in HT are present and may be worsened by new allocation practices. Methods: Cohort: Adults listed for HT before and after a heart allocation policy change (Era 1: Oct 18th, 2015 - Oct 18th, 2018, Era 2: Oct 18th, 2018-June 30, 2021). The primary outcome was the rate of HT by race (Black vs. White), assessed using multivariable competing risk analysis (compete: waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration). Final adjusted models included co-morbidities, SES and community-level Social Determinants of Health. The secondary outcome was waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration. Results: Of 17,384 waitlist candidates (Era 1: 9,150, Era 2: 8,234), Black waitlist candidates had a lower rate of HT compared to White waitlist candidates in Era 1 (adjusted HR 0·90, 95 % CI 0·84-0·97, p = 0·0053) and in Era 2 (adjusted HR 0·81, 95 % CI 0·75-0·88, p <0·0001, era race interaction p=0·056). The rate of waitlist removal for death or deterioration was similar between races in Era 1 (adjusted HR 0·92, 95 % 0·77-1·1, p = 0·38), but increased for Black candidates in Era 2 (adjusted HR 1·34, 95 % CI 1·09-1·65, p = 0·0054, era race interaction p = 0·0051). Interpretation: Both the measured rate of transplantation and rate of delisting for death or clinical deterioration have worsened for Black compared to White waitlist candidates under the new allocation system. Causes for these disparities require further study. Funding: University of Minnesota Department of Cardiology funds.

Fulminant Giant Cell Myocarditis Requiring Bridge With Mechanical Circulatory Support to Heart Transplantation.

Giant cell myocarditis is a rare cause of cardiogenic shock requiring a high index of suspicion, rapid immunosuppressive therapy, and mechanical circulatory support. We present the case of a patient with giant cell myocarditis who underwent a successful bridge with four different types of mechanical circulatory support devices to heart transplantation. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Incremental cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal membranous oxygenation as a bridge to cardiac transplant or left ventricular assist device placement in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.

Objective: Emerging literature has described using venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to transplant or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. We sought to identify the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ECMO used as a bridge to cardiac transplant or LVAD. Methods: Patients with refractory cardiogenic shock who received venoarterial ECMO and were bridged to either cardiac transplant (n = 7) or a HeartMate 3 LVAD (n = 6) placement were included. Markov modeling was used, comparing ECMO bridging with non-ECMO-bridged patients. Cohorts entered the model alive and at every 1-year cycle, were exposed to risk of death, and ran forward for 20 years after transplant or LVAD. Results: Patients bridged with ECMO to cardiac transplant were stratified as group 1 whereas those bridged with ECMO to LVAD were stratified as group 2. The average ECMO run was 3 days in group 1 versus 11 days in group 2. Among group 1 patients, the ICER was $246,629 but was paired with a longer life expectancy. The ICER of group 2 patients was -$107,088 and was not paired with a longer life expectancy. The average inpatient cost for group 1 was found to be $636,023 versus $769,471 for group 2 patients. The average inpatient costs for patients not bridged to ECMO who received cardiac transplant or LVAD was $538,928 and $325,242, respectively. Conclusions: Using ECMO to bridge to transplant or LVAD placement is not cost effective. However, patients bridged to transplant are paired with longer life expectancy in contrast to patients bridged to LVAD.

Inspirations from a Complicated Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

It takes only 1 profound experience to change someone's life. We invite you to read about how an experience of struggle led to a motivation in medicine. Through a first-person perspective, the author details the sequence of diagnosis and treatment of his own case of cardiac transplantation secondary to viral cardiomyopathy.

Impact of preoperative versus postoperative dialysis on left ventricular assist device outcomes: An analysis from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database.

Objective: Chronic kidney disease and renal failure are common in patients being considered for left ventricular assist device support. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation with preoperative dialysis and those with new-onset postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis. Methods: All patients (n = 14,090) undergoing primary left ventricular assist device implantation who were listed in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database (2014-2019) were evaluated. Landmark analysis then stratified patients alive at 1 month by preoperative dialysis and at 1 month postoperatively, preoperative dialysis only, postoperative dialysis only, and no dialysis. Results: Of 14,090 patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation, patients on dialysis (400%, 3%) preoperatively had significantly higher mortality at 1 month (18% vs 6%, P < .0001). However, of patients on preoperative dialysis, 131 (32.8%) no longer required dialysis at 1 month postoperatively and had long-term survival similar to patients who never required dialysis (no dialysis vs recovered, P = .13). Long-term survival was significantly worse in patients with persistent dialysis and new dialysis at 1 month postoperatively (P < .0001). Time to first stroke, major nondevice infection, any bleeding event, and gastrointestinal bleeding were all worse in patients on preoperative or postoperative dialysis (all P < .0001). Device infection, malfunction, or thrombosis was not associated with dialysis status (P > .05). Negative predictors of recovery include biventricular assist device (odds ratio, 0.20) and inotropes 1 week postimplant (odds ratio, 0.19). Conclusions: Preoperative renal failure is associated with 3 times higher mortality and worse morbidity in patients receiving a left ventricular assist device. However, one-third of patients with preoperative dialysis will recover renal function postimplant with similar long-term survival and quality of life as those without dialysis.

Percutaneous Decommissioning 11 Years After Initial CF-LVAD Placement.

An 80-year-old man with severe nonischemic cardiomyopathy status post left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement 11 years prior presented for recurrent LVAD alarms from internal driveline fracture. Given his partial myocardial recovery and his preference to avoid surgical procedures, percutaneous LVAD decommissioning was performed by occlusion of the outflow graft and subsequently driveline removal. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Simultaneous Leadless Pacemaker and Subcutaneous ICD Implantation With Intraoperative Screening: Workflow in Two Patients.

A communicating subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and leadless pacemaker system is being developed for patients who require both pacing and ICD therapy. It is important to ensure that the paced morphology from the leadless pacemaker will be sensed appropriately by the subcutaneous ICD. We present 2 cases illustrating our approach and workflow. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Prolonged waitlisting is associated with mortality in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported heart transplantation candidates.

Objective: Heart transplantation (HTx) candidates supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be listed at highest status 1 but are at inherent risk for ECMO-related complications. The effect of waitlist time on postlisting survival remains unclear in candidates with ECMO support who are listed using the new allocation system. Methods: Adult candidates listed with ECMO for a first-time, single-organ HTx from October 18, 2018, to March 21, 2021, in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were included and stratified according to waitlist time (≤7 vs ≥8 days). Postlisting outcomes were compared between cohorts. Results: Among 175 candidates waitlisted for ≤7 days, 162 (92.6%) underwent HTx whereas 13 (7.4%) died/deteriorated compared with 41 (57.8%) and 21 (29.6%) of the 71 candidates waitlisted for ≥8 days, respectively (P < .01). Blood type O candidates (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; 95% CI, 1.54-5.61) were more likely to wait ≥8 days whereas candidates with concurrent intra-aortic balloon pump were less likely (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.89). Obesity was additionally associated among those listed at status 1 (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.00-4.17). Waitlisting for ≥8 days was independently associated with 90-day postlisting mortality conditional on survival to day 8 postlisting (hazard ratio, 5.59; 95% CI, 2.59-12.1). Candidates listed at status 1 showed similar trends (hazard ratio, 5.49; 95% CI, 2.39-12.6). There was no significant difference in 90-day post-HTx survival depending on whether a candidate waited for ≥8 days versus ≤7 days (92.7 vs 92.0%; log rank P = .87). Conclusions: Among ECMO-supported candidates, obtaining HTx within 1 week of listing might improve overall survival.

Percutaneous Decommissioning of a Left Ventricular Assist Device in a Patient With Myocardial Recovery.

A 37-year-old man was referred for consideration of percutaneous decommissioning of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Following careful hemodynamic monitoring during pump turn-down and temporary outflow graft occlusion, the LVAD was permanently decommissioned by using a vascular plug to induce thrombosis of the outflow graft. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).