Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 40(1): 50, 2024 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308698

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted surgery (TULS) mixed benefits of laparoscopic and open surgeries. Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) is a well-known procedure, accepted and currently used by pediatric surgeons for treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis (UA). There is no current agreement in its use for the complicated appendiceal infections (CA). We reported our results using TULAA for both UA and CA. METHODS: We retrospectively collected TULAA performed between April 2017 and April 2022. Appendicitis were classified in UA and CA. We analyzed conversion rate, operative time, length of stay, surgical site infections (SSIs) rate, postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and costs. RESULTS: Over 5 years, 316 children underwent TULAA. Conversion rate was 3%. Mean age at surgery was 9.36 years (IQR 2-16). Forty-nine appendicitis were CA. Operative time and hospital stay was higher in CA than in UA group (38.33 vs. 60.73 min, p < 0.00001; 4 vs. 7 days, p < 0.00001). SSIs rate showed no statistically significant difference between two groups. Incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal collections was 11% in CA and 1% in UA. TULAA's cost was 192.07 €. CONCLUSION: In our series, TULAA seems to be safe, feasible and cost-effective for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, with no disadvantage in terms of outcomes compared to what is reported in literature for CLS.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Adolescente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ombligo/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía
2.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 294, 2023 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37752449

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are few studies comparing robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) in Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR). This study aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between RAS and LAS performed during the same period. METHODS: All consecutive 75 patients with pathologically diagnosed as HSCR who underwent Swenson pull-through surgery from April 2020 to Nov 2022, were included. Patients were divided into RAS group and LAS group and a retrospective analysis was performed based on clinical indexes and prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were included, among which, 31 patients received RAS and 44 received LAS. The RAS and LAS groups had similar ages, sex, weight, postoperative hospital stays, and fasting times. Compared with LAS, blood loss (p = 0.002) and the incidence of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (p = 0.046) were significantly lower in the RAS group. The first onset of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis in patients younger than 3 months occurred significantly earlier (p = 0.043). Two patients experienced anastomotic leakage in the LAS group and one patient experienced incisional hernia in the RAS group. The cost of RAS was significantly higher than that of LAS (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RAS is a safe and effective alternative for HSCR children, and a delaying primary surgery until later in infancy (> 3 months) may improve outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Enterocolitis , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/cirugía , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Enterocolitis/etiología , Enterocolitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 39(1): 139, 2023 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36842154

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of data regarding the comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) for the treatment of paediatric choledochal cysts. Thus, our primary objective was a comparison of early complications namely post-operative bleeding, anastomotic leak, intestinal obstruction and the need for reoperation in both techniques. Our secondary objectives included a comparison of the mean time for surgery and HJ, conversion of procedure to open, intraoperative blood loss, late complications like cholangitis, stricture and post-operative outcomes like time to start oral feeds and length of post-operative stay. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of all children who underwent laparoscopic and robotic choledochal cyst excision with Roux-en-Y HJ from 2008 to 2021 was performed. RESULTS: Ninety patients were classified into Group R (robotic HJ), n = 20 and Group L (laparoscopic HJ), n = 70. Post-operative complications were comparable amongst groups R and L (2 vs 6; p = 1 and 1 vs 2, p = 0.53, respectively). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in group R (54.8 ± 13.5 ml vs 64.1 ± 17.3 ml; p = 0.0280). The mean time to complete HJ was significantly less in group R (58 ± 12 min vs 71 ± 11 min; p < 0.001) while the mean time to complete surgery was significantly more in Group R (284 ± 14 min vs 195 ± 18 min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary research report suggests overall comparable early complications in both groups.


Asunto(s)
Quiste del Colédoco , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Niño , Quiste del Colédoco/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Informe de Investigación , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Surg Res ; 269: 212-217, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34600330

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement into the reoperative abdomen can be challenging due to intraperitoneal adhesions. Laparoscopic guidance may provide safe abdominal access and identify an area for optimal cerebrospinal fluid drainage. The study aim was to compare laparoscopic-assisted VPS placement to an "open" approach in patients with prior abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of children undergoing VPS placement into a reoperative abdomen from 2009-2019. Clinical data were collected, and patients undergoing laparoscopy (LAP) were compared to those undergoing an open approach (OPEN). RESULTS: A total of 120 children underwent 169 VPS placements at a median age of 8 y (IQR 2-15 y), and a mean number of two prior abdominal operations (IQR 1-2). Laparoscopy was used in 24% of cases. Shunt-related complications within 30 d were lower in the LAP group (0% versus 19%, P = 0.001), as were VPS-related postoperative emergency department visits (0% versus 13%, P = 0.003) and readmissions (0% versus 13%, P = 0.013). Shunt malfunction rates were higher (42% OPEN versus 25% LAP, P = 0.03) and occurred sooner in the OPEN group (median 26 versus 78 wk, P = 0.01). The LAP group demonstrated shorter operative times (63 versus 100 min, P < 0.0001), and the only bowel injury. Time to feeds, length of stay, and mortality were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic guidance during VPS placement into the reoperative abdomen is associated with a decrease in shunt-related complications, longer shunt patency, and shorter operative times. Prospective study may clarify the potential benefits of laparoscopy in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Hidrocefalia , Laparoscopía , Abdomen/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Derivación Ventriculoperitoneal/efectos adversos
5.
Surg Endosc ; 36(2): 1515-1526, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33825015

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There are limited numbers of high-volume centers performing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) routinely. Several approaches to MIPD have been described. Aim of this analysis was to show the learning curve of three different approaches to MIPD. Focus was on determining the number of cases necessary to obtain proficient level in MIPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study wherein outcomes of 300 consecutive patients at three centers-at each center the initial 100 consecutive patients undergoing MIPD for malignant and benign tumors of the head of the pancreas and perimpullary area, performed by three experienced surgeons were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 300 patients after MIPD were included: the three different cohorts (laparoscopic n = 100, hybrid n = 100, robotic n = 100). CUSUM analysis of operating time in each center demonstrated that the plateau for laparoscopic PD was n = 61, for hybrid PDes was n = 32 and for robotic PD was n = 68. Median operative time for laparoscopic, hybrid, and robotic approaches was 395 min, 404 min, 510 min, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss for laparoscopic PD, hybrid PD, and robotic PD was 250 ml, 250 ml, and 413 ml, respectively. Delayed gastric emptying occurred 12% in laparoscopic cohort, 10% in hybrid, and 53% in robotic cohort. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) rate for laparoscopic PD, hybrid PD, and robotic PD was 32%, 37%, and 22% with 5% death in each cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: This analysis of the learning curve of three European centers found a shorter learning curve with hybrid PD as compared to laparoscopic and robotic PD. In implementation of a MIPD program, a stepwise approach might be beneficial.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Tempo Operativo , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos
6.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 56(12): 1442-1449, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34666594

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic localization of gastrointestinal tumors has long been an important objective. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application of a magnetic tracer technique during laparoscopic-assisted surgery. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with gastrointestinal tumors, who voluntarily underwent endoscopic marking between May 2019 and May 2020, were enrolled. A magnetic ring was clamped onto tissues adjacent to the lesion and released during preoperative endoscopy. Then, another magnet ring or laparoscopic instrument was delivered to the wall of the digestive tract contralateral to the lesion and attracted, thus achieving accurate intraoperative localization. Observational evaluation included data regarding preoperative marking, intraoperative localization, operation, and safety. RESULTS: Fifty-six of the 57 (98.2%) patients with gastric tumors (n = 35), duodenal tumors (n = 1), and colorectal tumors (n = 20), successfully underwent marking, localization, and resection. The mean margins of proximal and distal resection of colorectal tumors were 106 and 78 mm, respectively. The mean (± SD) duration of endoscopic marking and laparoscopic localization for gastric/duodenal and colorectal tumors were 5.3 ± 0.3, 1.0 ± 0.1, 5.5 ± 0.4, and 1.0 ± 0.1 min, respectively. No complications occurred in 56 of the 57 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The magnetic tracer technique demonstrated promising potential as a localization method for gastrointestinal tumors, with superior safety, effectiveness, rapidity, and convenience.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Fenómenos Magnéticos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía
7.
Surg Endosc ; 35(9): 5009-5014, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32968912

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is becoming more popular because of the excellent performance in anastomosis and knot tying, especially in complex surgical procedures such as hepaticojejunostomy. As for operative time and costs, laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) seem to be more advantageous. To date, there are only limited studies focusing on the comparison between RAS and LAS. This study aims to investigate differences in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic approaches. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study of 140 patients operated via mini-invasive approaches for choledochal cyst (CC) excision and hepaticojejunostomy at the Wuhan Union Hospital from Jun 2014 to Dec 2019. A multivariable logistic regression model for odds to having complications was built. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in age, sex, follow-up time, and Todani modification of the Alonso-Lej classification distribution. Patients undergoing RAS had longer overall operative time, shorter cyst excision time, shorter hepaticojejunostomy time, less estimated blood loss, a smaller postoperative high fever rate, shorter postoperative LOS, and a lower postoperative complication rate. Moreover, the intraoperative anatomy structures were more explicit in group RAS, such as the exposure of left or right hepatic duct opening and intrapancreatic bile duct. Multivariable logistic regression showed that longer hepaticojejunostomy time was the only risk factor of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted CC excision and hepaticojejunostomy was associated with better intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes when compared to laparoscopic-assisted surgery.


Asunto(s)
Quiste del Colédoco , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Quiste del Colédoco/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Dig Surg ; 38(3): 198-204, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33774616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Additional surgery is necessary in cases with non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection. It is still unknown whether preceding endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for T1 colorectal carcinoma affects the short outcomes of patients who underwent additional surgery or not as compared with surgery alone without ESD. METHODS: Patients (101 pairs) with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent additional laparoscopic-assisted surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (additional surgery group, n = 101) or laparoscopic-assisted surgery alone (surgery alone group, n = 101) were matched (1:1). Short-term morbidity, operation outcomes, and lymph node metastasis of the resected specimen were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the additional laparoscopic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic-assisted surgery alone groups in lymph node metastasis (9.9 vs. 5.9%, respectively, p = 0.297), operative time (147.76 ± 52.00 min vs. 156.50 ± 54.28 min, p = 0.205), first flatus time (3.56 ± 1.10 days vs. 3.63 ± 1.05 days, p = 0.282), first stool time (4.30 ± 1.04 days vs. 4.39 ± 1.22 days, p = 0.293), time to intake (5.00 ± 1.18 days vs. 5.25 ± 1.39 days, p = 0.079), blood loss (44.75 ± 45.40 mL vs. 60.40 ± 78.98 mL, p = 0.603), harvest lymph nodes (18.74 ± 7.22 vs. 20.32 ± 9.69, p = 0.438), postoperative surgical complications (p = 0.733), and postoperative length of hospital stay (8.68 ± 4.00 days vs. 8.39 ± 1.94 days, p = 0.401). CONCLUSION: ESD did not increase the difficulty of additional laparoscopic-assisted surgery, hospital stay, or the incidence of postoperative complications. Additional laparoscopic-assisted surgery is safe and recommended for patients with T1 cancer at high risk of lymph node metastasis and residual cancer after non-curative ESD.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Laparoscopía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Surgeon ; 19(6): e462-e474, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33248924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Total Mesorectal Excisions (TME) is the standard treatment of rectal cancer. It can be performed under laparoscopic, robotic or transanal approach. Inadvertent injury to surrounding structure like autonomic nerves is avoidable, no matter which approach is adopted. Lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) is a less commonly performed pelvic operation involving dissection in an unfamiliar area to most general surgeons. This article aims to clarify all the essential anatomy related to these procedures. METHODS: We performed thorough literature search and revision on the pelvic anatomy. Our cases of TME and LLND, under either laparoscopic or transanal approach, were reviewed. We integrated the knowledge from literatures and our own experience. The result was presented in details, together with original figures and intra-operative photos. MAIN FINDINGS: Anatomy of pelvic fascia, autonomic nerve system, anal canal and sphincter complex are core knowledge in performing TME and LLND. CONCLUSIONS: Thorough understanding of the pelvic anatomy enables colorectal surgeons to master these procedures, avoid complication and perform extended resection. On the other hand, surgeons can appreciate the complex pelvic anatomy easier by seeing the pelvis in opposite angles (transabdominal and transaanal view).


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias del Recto , Canal Anal/cirugía , Disección , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 35(3): 395-402, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31872265

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic converted surgery for patients with colon cancer. METHODS: Retrospective database of consecutive curative-intent laparoscopic-assisted surgery for primary stage I-III colon cancer was reviewed from 2000 to 2013. The patients were divided into non-conversion and conversion groups. The patient characters, operative features, perioperative parameters, pathologic features, and oncologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 4010 patients were included in the study: 3929 in the non-conversion group and 81 (2%) in the conversion group. The median follow-up period was 63.9 months. There were significant differences in age, preoperative clinical T-stage, and tumor size between the groups. In operative details between the two groups, there were also significant differences in access to surgery, tumor location, cancer obstruction, cancer perforation, and estimated blood loss (P < 0.001). The two most common reasons for conversion were adhesion (n = 37, 46%) and bleeding (n = 21, 26%). Multivariate analysis showed that conversion was an independent predictor of both overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P = 0.003). The 5-year OS rate of the conversion group was 79.6%, and that of the non-conversion group was 96.2% (P < 0.001). The multivariate predictors of conversion were age, type of surgery, cancer obstruction, cancer perforation, and clinical T-stage. CONCLUSION: Conversion to open surgery may affect patient survival and recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer. Our data suggest that conversion is associated with poor outcomes, but we should not hesitate to convert it to patients who have difficulty in laparoscopic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Laparoscopía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Periodo Posoperatorio , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
World J Surg Oncol ; 17(1): 170, 2019 Oct 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31651341

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lymphangiomas are uncommon congenital malformations that present mainly in the head, neck, and axillar regions in pediatric patients. Mesenteric cystic lymphangiomas (MCLs), which occasionally present with substantial growth and the invasion of adjacent vital structures, are rarely reported in adults. We report a case of MCL in an adult who was treated with laparoscopic-assisted excision. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old Japanese man visited his family physician for prolonged periumbilical pain. Plain computed tomography (CT) showed a low-density mass in his left abdomen, and he was referred to our hospital 2 weeks later. His abdomen was flat and soft, and no mass was felt upon palpation. Routine laboratory data showed no abnormalities in the blood cell counts. The levels of tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125), were within normal ranges. Contrast-enhanced CT was performed, and a low-density mass was observed with an irregular outline and poor contrast, as well as involvement of the peripheral mesenteric artery and partial compression of the adjacent jejunum without dilatation of the oral side of the bowel. The patient was diagnosed with lymphatic cysts and observed for 1 month without symptom exacerbation. Follow-up CT showed no increase in the size of the mass but showed apparent invasion of the jejunal wall without bowel obstruction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed intermediate intensity on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and high intensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). The coronal view on T2WI clearly showed an accumulation of cystic lesions. We performed tumor excision with partial resection of the jejunum in a laparoscopic-assisted manner. Pathological examination showed multicystic lesions with an attenuated endothelial lining, surrounding rich adipose tissue and scattered smooth muscle fibers; the patient was diagnosed with MCL. Immunohistochemical assays supported this diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This is rare case of MCL presenting in an adult who underwent successful laparoscopic-assisted resection. Mesenteric lymphangioma (ML) should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with intraabdominal cysts. Radical excision is optimal, even when the patient is asymptomatic. Laparoscopic-assisted tumor resection is a suitable surgical method for treating MLs located in the peripheral mesentery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Yeyuno/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Linfangioma Quístico/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Adulto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/patología , Linfangioma Quístico/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfangioma Quístico/patología , Masculino , Mesenterio , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
12.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 39(8): 1164-1168, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31334680

RESUMEN

We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and total cost of laparoscopy-assisted suprapubic salpingectomy (LASS), which utilises conventional open surgery equipment without any sealing or coagulation devices and reduces port sites compared to conventional laparoscopy (CL). Fifty-seven consecutive, age-matched patients presenting with a tubal pregnancy were enrolled. In the LASS group, a 10 mm reusable umbilical optical trocar and a 10 mm suprapubic trocar was used. The other 30 patients were managed with multiport CL. All of the patients were asked to use the visual analogue scale and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to evaluate their cosmetic satisfaction. The duration of surgery was 21.19 ± 2.33 minutes for the LASS group and 36.9 ± 4.9 minutes for the CL group (p < .001). The postoperative 6th-hour VAS score was 2.44 ± 0.5 for the LASS group and 3.03 ± 0.8 for the CL group (p: .005). All of the PSAS and OSAS parameter scores were significantly lower in LASS group than CL group. In conclusion, the LASS procedure is a feasible method for treating ectopic pregnancies with a shorter surgical duration, lower VAS scores, and better cosmetic scores than CL. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Laparoscopy or laparotomy may be performed for the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Conventional laparoscopy has some advantages such as shorter hospital stay and recovery time and the better cosmetic results. However, the equipment used in conventional laparoscopy and single incision laparoscopy are more expensive than conventional open surgery equipment. What the results of this study add? Laparoscopy-assisted suprapubic salpingectomy (LASS) method has shorter operation time, lower VAS scores, better cosmetic scores and cheaper than conventional laparoscopy. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The LASS procedure looks like a feasible method for treating ectopic pregnancies and the feasibility of this procedure should be confirmed by a larger series of patients and randomised trials.


Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo , Laparoscopía/métodos , Embarazo Ectópico/cirugía , Salpingectomía/economía , Salpingectomía/métodos , Adulto , Cicatriz/patología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Tempo Operativo , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Embarazo , Salpingectomía/instrumentación , Piel/patología , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos
13.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 55(1)2019 Jan 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30634701

RESUMEN

Isolated cecal necrosis (ICN) is a rare condition which is developed under decreased mesenteric perfusion. Only a few dozen cases of ICN have been reported previously. The patient was a 59-year-old male with a previous history of atrial fibrillation. He presented to our emergency room with the chief complaint of lower abdominal pain. Computed tomography imaging revealed a dilated cecum and presence of free air. With a preoperative diagnosis of perforation of the cecum; an urgent surgery was conducted. Intraoperative findings revealed an ischemic change of the cecum and a laparoscopic-assisted ileocecal resection was performed. The pathological findings showed transmural ischemic change on the anti-mesenteric side of the cecum, and the diagnosis of ICN was achieved. Preoperative diagnosis of ICN is difficult because of its non-specific radiological features. In patients with right lower abdominal pain, ICN should be considered as a differential diagnosis especially if the patient has a comorbidity causing hypotension attack.


Asunto(s)
Ciego/diagnóstico por imagen , Ciego/patología , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/patología , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Ciego/irrigación sanguínea , Ciego/cirugía , Errores Diagnósticos , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Ileostomía , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis , Periodo Preoperatorio , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
14.
J Minim Access Surg ; 14(4): 321-334, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29483373

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Three operative techniques have been used for colorectal cancer (CRC) resection: Conventional laparotomy (CL) and the mini-invasive techniques (MITs)- laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) and mini-laparotomy (ML). The aim of the study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing the three surgical approaches for Stage I-III CRC resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study enrolled 688 patients with Stage I-III CRC undergoing curative resection. The primary endpoints were perioperative quality and outcomes. The secondary endpoints were oncological outcomes including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR). RESULTS: Patients undergoing LAS had significantly less blood loss (P < 0.001), earlier first flatus (P = 0.002) and earlier resumption of normal diet (P = 0.025). Although post-operative complication rates were remarkably higher in patients undergoing CL than in those undergoing MITs (P = 0.002), no difference was observed in the post-operative mortality rate (P = 0.099) or 60-day re-intervention rate (P = 0.062). The quality of operation as assessed by the number of lymph nodes harvested and rates of R0 resection did not differ among the groups (all P > 0.05). During a median follow-up of 5.42 years, no significant difference was observed among the treatment groups in the rates of 3-year late morbidity, 3-year LR, 5-year LR, 5-year OS or 5-year DFS (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CL had higher post-operative morbidities. Moreover, the study findings confirm the favourable short-term and comparable long-term outcomes of LAS and ML for curative CRC resection. Therefore, both MITs may be feasible and safe alternatives to CL for Stage I-III CRC resection.

15.
Surg Endosc ; 31(12): 5372-5380, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28597283

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) is the technique of choice for all types of appendicitis in our Department. It combines the advantages of laparoscopy (global vision and minimally invasion) and open surgery (lower cost). The objective was to assess the results of our TULAA series and compare them to the results of standard laparoscopic appendectomies (SLA) performed during the same period. METHODS: Retrospective review of total appendectomies performed since TULAA introduction (September 2003 to December 2015) with statistic analysis of the results. RESULTS: A total of 1309 patients underwent TULAA approach, but 126 (9.6%) needed reconversion to open appendectomy, 1 (0.08%) to SLA, and 9 (0.7%) introduction of a second port. Mean age and weight of patients was 121.5 ± 36 months and 37.6 ± 14 kg, respectively. Mean operative time was 40.9 ± 15.5 min, ranging from 11 to 110. All types of appendicitis were present, with 394 being complicated (29.9%). Postoperative complications were seen in 168 patients (14.3%), 37 being readmitted (3.2%), and only five needing reintervention (Two intestinal occlusions and three abscess debridement). When comparing TULAA and SLA, there were no significant differences in the length of hospitalization, time to tolerate soft diet, analgesic requirements, and complications depending on the type of appendicitis, but TULAA was significantly faster and cheaper (average 900€). CONCLUSIONS: In our hands, TULAA has shown to be effective, easy to learn, and fast to perform. Low surgical cost is probably its principal advantage, which might be encouraging in times of crisis.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Ombligo/cirugía , Adolescente , Apendicectomía/economía , Apendicectomía/instrumentación , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Técnicas de Sutura , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Surg Endosc ; 30(8): 3357-61, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26497947

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAC) is an alternative to open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), a recently developed procedure, is increasingly used to resect GISTs originated from the muscularis propria. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare EFTR with LAC as minimally invasive treatments for GISTs, especially those with a diameter <2 cm, originating from the muscularis propria. Moreover, we evaluated the clinical efficacy, safety, and feasibility of EFTR for GISTs. METHODS: The study included 68 patients with GISTs originating from the muscularis propria (35 patients who underwent EFTR, and 33 who underwent LAC) who were treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University (Zhanjiang, China) between January 2011 and December 2013. The therapeutic outcomes of EFTR and LAC were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: In the EFTR group, the mean tumor size was 13 ± 5 mm, the mean procedure time was 91 ± 63 min, and the complete resection rate was 100 %. There were 35 "artificial" perforations and four cases of intraoperative bleeding; all complications were successfully managed endoscopically without emergency surgery. In the LAC group, the mean tumor size was 16 ± 4 mm, the mean operation time was 155 ± 37 min, and complications included three wound infections and one anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSIONS: EFTR was associated with a lower complication rate than LAC, with favorable en bloc and sufficient tumor tissue for histological diagnosis. EFTR seems to be an efficacious, relatively safe, and minimally invasive treatment for GISTs and could replace LAC surgical resection in cases where the tumor is smaller than 2 cm in diameter.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther ; 13(1): 30-36, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38487612

RESUMEN

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic laparoscopic surgery for avoiding adnexal torsion in pregnant women with benign adnexal masses. Materials and Methods: This report contains two analyses, each for a different group of patients. Analysis 1: Surgical and pregnancy outcomes were examined among the 126 cases who underwent laparoscopic assisted cystectomy for adnexal masses during pregnancy in our hospital between January 2001 and December 2020. Analysis 2: The incidence of adnexal torsion during pregnancy was evaluated among the cases with adnexal masses ≥5 cm who opted for conservative follow-up in our hospital between January 2011 and December 2020. Results: In analysis 1, the most common pathological diagnosis was a mature cystic teratoma (76.2%). The mean gestational age at surgery was 13.1 ± 1.3 weeks. No cases were converted to laparotomy and oophorectomy. Regarding delivery outcomes, 97.4% of cases went on to have full-term deliveries. In Analysis 2, the incidence of adnexal mass ≥5 cm that did not resolve spontaneously during pregnancy was 89 cases (0.8%). The frequency of malignancy was 3 cases (0.03%). In 28 cases who opted for conservative treatment, 5 (17.9%) underwent emergency surgery for adnexal torsion. Conclusion: Prophylactic surgery for benign adnexal masses during pregnancy can be performed laparoscopically and preserved ovarian functions. In pregnant women with adnexal masses that do not resolve spontaneously, planning laparoscopic surgery is considered beneficial for complications, such as adnexal torsion.

18.
J Clin Neurosci ; 115: 24-28, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37459828

RESUMEN

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) insertion into the abdominal cavity had been done for decades via an open approach. Recently, the laparoscopic insertion of the peritoneal portion of the shunt has become an option. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes between these two approaches. We performed a single institution retrospective review of 104 consecutive adult patients between 2015 and 2017. Patients had peritoneal catheters placed either via an open approach by the neurosurgical team, or laparoscopically by general surgeons. Patient demographics and outcomes were compared using a non-inferiority analysis. Independent variables in the analysis included patient age, gender, race, BMI, surgery performed, previous VPS placement, previous abdominal procedures, and VPS indication, while dependent variables included length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), occurrence of shunt failure, and postoperative complications. Cohort analysis included 62 open and 42 laparoscopic cases with similar baseline characteristics. In terms of patient outcomes, EBL and hospital stay duration were shown to be non-inferior in the open group as compared to the laparoscopic group. We could not prove non-inferiority based on risk for overall or distal shunt failure. Neurosurgeons may reasonably continue to place peritoneal shunt catheters using a "traditional" method.


Asunto(s)
Hidrocefalia , Laparoscopía , Adulto , Humanos , Derivación Ventriculoperitoneal/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Hidrocefalia/cirugía
19.
Drug Discov Ther ; 17(3): 217-219, 2023 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37331809

RESUMEN

Diospyrobezoar is a relatively uncommon cause of small bowel obstruction. Here we report successful treatment in a patient with small bowel obstruction due to diospyrobezoar by laparoscopic-assisted surgery. A 93-year-old woman who had undergone distal gastrectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy presented with nausea and anorexia. An intestinal obstruction and an intestinal intraluminal mass were discovered on abdominal enhanced computed tomography. Following a transnasal ileus tube placement, the patient underwent laparoscopic surgery to remove the diospyrobezoar from the small intestine. The postoperative course of the patient was uneventful. Laparoscopic-assisted surgery following the transnasal ileus tube was beneficial for the patient's small bowel obstruction caused by diospyrobezoar.


Asunto(s)
Ileus , Obstrucción Intestinal , Laparoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Ileus/etiología , Ileus/cirugía , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos
20.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 14(2): 815-823, 2023 Apr 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37201065

RESUMEN

Background: The clinical outcomes and benefits of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in colorectal cancer have not been fully evaluated comparing to conventional laparoscopic-assisted radical resection. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the short-term clinical benefits of NOSES versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery for the treatment of sigmoid and rectal cancer. Methods: A total of 112 patients with sigmoid or rectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. The observation group (n=60) was treated with NOSES, and the control group (n=52) was treated with conventional laparoscopic-assisted radical resection. Following these interventions, the postoperative recovery and inflammatory response indexes were compared between the two groups. Results: In contrast with the control group, the observation group significantly had longer operation time (t=2.83, P=0.006), but shorter durations for the resumption of a semi-liquid diet (t=2.17, P=0.032), and length of postoperative hospital stay (t=2.74, P=0.007), as well as fewer postoperative incision infections (χ2=7.32, P=0.009). Moreover, the levels of immunoglobulin (Ig), including IgG (t=2.29, P=0.024), IgA (t=3.30, P=0.001), and IgM (t=3.38, P=0.001), in the observation group were markedly higher than those within the control group at 3 days postoperatively. Also, the levels of inflammatory indicators including interleukin (IL)-6 (t=4.22, P=5.02E-5), C-reactive protein (CRP) (t=3.73, P=3.5E-4), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (t=2.94, P=0.004) in the observation group were considerably lower than those in the control group at 3 days after the operation. Conclusions: NOSES can improve the postoperative recovery and has benefits in reducing the inflammatory response than conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA