Wrong site spine surgery in the U.K.: a review of current practice.

Wrong site spine surgery is a rare but serious complication. The scale of the problem in the U.K. and the current practice of spine surgeons in localising the level whilst performing routine spine surgery is unknown. As these events are rare and their nature very disparate, it is necessary to identify whether there are any common themes to be able to take effective steps to mitigate this risk. A review was undertaken of the wrong site spine surgery incidents submitted to StEIS (Strategic Executive Information System), the system used to report and monitor the progress of Serious Incident investigations across the NHS. Subsequently a survey of the Society of British Neurosurgeons was undertaken to answer some of the questions which arose from this review. Up to half of spine surgeons surveyed by the SBNS admit to having performed wrong site spine surgery. 40 percent of wrong site surgery reported to NHSE was at the L4/5 level. What exactly constitutes wrong level spine surgery is not universally accepted by spine surgeons. The critical factors in causing wrong site spine surgery in the U.K. are explored. It is hoped that the results from this study would improve training, lead to better policies and support investment in trying to reduce this complication.

How can Never Event data be used to reflect or improve hospital safety performance?

The absolute number of Never Events is used by UK regulators to help assess hospital safety performance, without account of hospital workload. We applied funnel plots, as an established means of taking workload into account, to published Never Event data for 151 acute Trusts in NHS England, matched to finished consultant episodes for 3 years, 2017-2020. Trusts with excess event rates should have the most Never Events if absolute number is a valid way to judge performance. The absolute number of Never Events was correlated with workload (r2 = 0.51, p < 0.001), but the five Trusts above the upper 95% confidence limit did not have the highest number of Never Events. However, a limitation to interpretation was that the data were skewed; 12 out of 151 Trusts lay below the lower 95% limit. This skew probably arises because funnel plots pool all Never Events and workload data; whereas, ideally, different Never Events should use as denominator only the relevant workload actions that could cause them. We conclude that the manner in which Never Event data are currently used by regulators, in part to judge or rate hospitals, is mathematically invalid. The focus should shift from identifying 'outlier' hospitals to reducing the overall national mean Never Event rate through shared learning and an integrated system-wide approach.

The impact of wrong-site surgery on dental undergraduate teaching: a survey of UK dental schools.

INTRODUCTION: Patient safety within dental education is paramount. Wrong-site surgery (WSS) tooth extraction is not uncommon and is a significant never event (NE) in dentistry. This study aimed to explore dental schools' undergraduate experience of NEs, safety interventions implemented and the impact on student experience. METHODS: All 16 UK dental schools were surveyed via email. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. A modified World Health Organization (WHO) checklist was used within institutions (94%) including pre-operative briefings and recording teeth on whiteboards (81%, respectively). Students were directly supervised performing extractions (63%) utilising a 1:4 staff: student ratio. WSS by students was reported in 69% of schools, with student experience being impacted by an increased patient safety focus. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated an increased utilisation of an adapted WHO checklist. Modification of practices to ensure patient safety was demonstrated at all schools, irrespective of student WSS occurrences. Institutions experiencing student NEs commonly implemented WHO checklists and recording teeth for extraction on whiteboards. Other strategies included direct staff supervision and pre-operative briefings. CONCLUSION: UK dental schools have increased the emphasis on patient safety by the implementation of national healthcare models, for example WHO checklists and pre-operative briefings. These strategies both aim to improve communication and teamwork. Increased levels of staff supervision foster greater quality of teaching; however, this has resulted in reduced student clinical experience. A proposed minimum standard for undergraduate surgery is suggested to ensure safe and competent dental practitioners of the future.

Interrater Agreement and Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Computer-Aided Detection Process for the Detection and Prevention of Retained Surgical Instruments.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a process incorporating computer-aided detection (CAD) for the detection and prevention of retained surgical instruments using a novel nondeformable radiopaque µTag. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A high-specificity CAD system was developed iteratively from a training set (n = 540 radiographs) and a validation set (n = 560 radiographs). A novel test set composed of 700 thoracoabdominal radiographs (410 with a randomly placed µTag and 290 without a µTag) was obtained from 10 cadavers embedded with confounding iatrogenic objects. Data were analyzed first by the blinded CAD system; radiographs coded as negative (n = 373) were then independently reviewed by five blinded radiologists. The reference standard was the presence of a µTag. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Interrater agreement was assessed with Cohen kappa values. Mean (± SD) image analysis times were calculated. RESULTS: The high-specificity CAD system had one false-positive (sensitivity, 79.5% [326/410]; specificity, 99.7% [289/290]). A combination of the CAD system and one failsafe radiologist had superior sensitivity (98.5% [404/410] to 100% [410/410]) and specificity (99.0% [287/290] to 99.7% [289/290]), with 327 (47%) radiographs not requiring immediate radiologist review. Interrater agreement was almost perfect for all radiologist pairwise comparisons (κ = 0.921-0.992). Cumulative mean image analysis time was less than one minute (CAD, 29 ± 2 seconds; radiologists, 26 ± 16 seconds). CONCLUSION: The combination of a high-specificity CAD system with a failsafe radiologist had excellent diagnostic accuracy in the rapid detection of a nondeformable radiopaque µTag.

Inadvertent Arterial Placement of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in an Infant With Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report.

Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement under real-time ultrasound guidance has emerged as a favorable procedure in children as a method to efficiently obtain central access. Nevertheless, small infants with hemodynamic instability are at high risk of complications and extra precautions are necessary. We present a case of an inadvertent arterial placement of a PICC in a two-month-old infant with dilated cardiomyopathy and decompensated heart failure. Differentiation of arteries and veins under ultrasonographic evaluation may sometimes be difficult when the applied tourniquet pressure exceeds the patient's arterial blood pressure. In particular, arterial flow can be easily compromised by applying tourniquet pressure in small children with low blood pressure. A thorough understanding of the upper extremity vascular anatomy, basic scanning techniques, and meticulous preparation especially in small infants with hemodynamic instability are essential for maintaining the safety and efficacy of this procedure.

Factors contributing to preventing operating room "never events": a machine learning analysis.

BACKGROUND: A surgical "Never Event" is a preventable error occurring immediately before, during or immediately following surgery. Various factors contribute to the occurrence of major Never Events, but little is known about their quantified risk in relation to a surgery's characteristics. Our study uses machine learning to reveal and quantify risk factors with the goal of improving patient safety and quality of care. METHODS: We used data from 9,234 observations on safety standards and 101 root-cause analyses from actual, major "Never Events" including wrong site surgery and retained foreign item, and three random forest supervised machine learning models to identify risk factors. Using a standard 10-cross validation technique, we evaluated the models' metrics, measuring their impact on the occurrence of the two types of Never Events through Gini impurity. RESULTS: We identified 24 contributing factors in six surgical departments: two had an impact of > 900% in Urology, Orthopedics, and General Surgery; six had an impact of 0-900% in Gynecology, Urology, and Cardiology; and 17 had an impact of < 0%. Combining factors revealed 15-20 pairs with an increased probability in five departments: Gynecology, 875-1900%; Urology, 1900-2600%; Cardiology, 833-1500%; Orthopedics,1825-4225%; and General Surgery, 2720-13,600%. Five factors affected wrong site surgery's occurrence (-60.96 to 503.92%) and five affected retained foreign body (-74.65 to 151.43%): two nurses (66.26-87.92%), surgery length < 1 h (85.56-122.91%), and surgery length 1-2 h (-60.96 to 85.56%). CONCLUSIONS: Using machine learning, we could quantify the risk factors' potential impact on wrong site surgeries and retained foreign items in relation to a surgery's characteristics, suggesting that safety standards should be adjusted to surgery's characteristics based on risk assessment in each operating room. . TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: MOH 032-2019.

Patient, Operator, and Procedural Characteristics of Guidewire Retention as a Complication of Vascular Catheter Insertion.

Guidewire retention after intravascular catheter insertion is considered a "never event." Prior reports attribute this complication to various characteristics including uncooperative patients, operator inexperience, off-hour or emergent insertion, and underutilization of ultrasound guidance. In this descriptive analysis of consecutive events, we assessed the frequency of patient, operator, and procedural factors in guidewire retention. DESIGN: Pre-specified observational analysis as part of a quality improvement study of consecutive guidewire retention events across a multihospital health system from August 2007 to October 2015. SETTING: Ten hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Health System in Ohio, United States. PATIENTS: Consecutive all-comers who experienced guidewire retention after vascular catheter insertion. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were manually obtained from the electronic medical records and reviewed for potential contributing factors for guidewire retention, stratified into patient, operator, and procedural characteristics. A total of 24 events were identified. Overall, the median age was 74 years, 58% were males, and the median body mass index was 26.5 kg/m2. A total of 12 (50%) individuals were sedated during the procedure. Most incidents (10 [42%]) occurred in internal jugular venous access sites. The majority of cases (13 [54%]) were performed or supervised by an attending. Among all cases, three (12%) were performed by first-year trainees, seven (29%) by residents, three (12%) by fellows, and four (17%) by certified nurse practitioners. Overall, 16 (67%) events occurred during regular working hours (8 amto 5 pm). In total, 22 (92%) guidewires were inserted nonemergently, with two (8%) during a cardiac arrest. Ultrasound guidance was used in all but one case. CONCLUSIONS: Guidewire retention can occur even in the presence of optimal patient, operator, and procedural circumstances, highlighting the need for constant awareness of this risk. Efforts to eliminate this important complication will require attention to issues surrounding the technical performance of the procedure.

A scoping review of clinical practices and adherence to UK national guidance related to the placement and position confirmation of adult nasogastric feeding tubes.

INTRODUCTION: The administration of nutrition or medication into the lungs or pleura via a misplaced nasogastric feeding tube is considered a never event. Despite guidance from the National Patient Safety Agency and NHS Improvement this never event is regularly reported. Confirmation of correct placement and correct use of nasogastric tubes requires appropriate actions and decisions by a multidisciplinary team. METHODS: A scoping review identified 43 records that discussed and supported nasogastric tube misplacement as a Never Event. Searches were completed using Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, British Nursing Index (BNI), as well as selected journals. A further manual search revealed 22 publicly available NHS Trust policies related to nasogastric feeding tube procedures. Items generated between 2011 and 2020 were considered eligible. A thematic analysis was completed to assess adherence to guidance and the practices in place across the NHS. RESULTS: Three key themes were identified as part of the review: referral and authorisation of radiography, examination description, and visualisation of the nasogastric tube tip. Large variations in practice were identified. While there is recognition of national guidance, records showed inconsistency and lacked the required detail to ensure patient safety. CONCLUSION: Despite classification as a never event, it is apparent that there is still room for improvement and further guidance in ensuring patient safety with respect to nasogastric tube insertion. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Practice requires further standardisation whilst also ensuring optimisation and safety. Guidance should address in depth imaging authorisation, language and exact standards of acceptability for imaging the full length of the nasogastric tube.

Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Retained surgical sharps (RSS) is a "never event" that is preventable but may still occur despite of correct count and negative X-ray. This study assesses the feasibility of a novel device ("Melzi Sharps Finder®" or MSF) in effective detection of RSS. METHODS: The first study consisted of determination of the presence of RSS or identification of RSS in an ex-vivo model (a container with hay in a laparoscopic trainer box). The second study consisted of determining presence of RSS in an in-vivo model (laparoscopy in live adult Yorkshire pigs) with 3 groups: C-arm, C-arm with MSF and MSF. The third study used similar apparatus though with laparotomy and included 2 groups: manual search and MSF. RESULTS: In the first study, the MSF group had a higher rate of identification of a needle and decreased time to locate a needle versus control (98.1% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.001; 1.64 min ± 1.12vs. 3.34 min ± 1.28, p < 0.001). It also had increased accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision (100% vs. 58.8%, p < 0.001; 1.69 min ± 1.43 vs. 4.89 min ± 0.63, p < 0.001). In-the second study, the accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and time to reach this decision were comparable in each group (88.9% vs. 100% vs. 84.5%, p < 0.49; 2.2 min ± 2.2 vs. 2.7 min ± 2.1vs. 2.8 min ± 1.7, p = 0.68). In the third study, MSF group had higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision than the control (97.0% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001; 2.0 min ± 1.5 vs. 3.9 min ± 1.4; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that MSF use was independently associated with an accurate determination of the presence of a needle (OR 12.1, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of MSF in this study's RSS models facilitated the determination of presence and localization of RSS as shown by the increased rate of identification of a needle, decreased time to identification and higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle. This device may be used in conjunction with radiography as it gives live visual and auditory feedback for users during the search for RSS.

Improving Patient Safety in a High-Volume Intravitreal Injection Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the root causes of patient safety events in a high-volume intravitreal injection clinic and to assess the effect of interventions to reduce the rate of events. DESIGN: Quality improvement study. SUBJECTS: All cases of intravitreal injection in a designated injection clinic between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. METHODS: The injection clinic model involved an injecting physician, who usually differed from a prescribing physician. The procedural injection area was also physically separate from the retina outpatient clinic. A root cause analysis was used to determine the factors that contributed to possible patient safety events in an institutional quality improvement project. Specific interventions were implemented to address each specific root cause. The rates of patient safety events (never events and near misses), whether associated with patient harm or not, were compared before and after the intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency (%) of patient-safety-related intravitreal injection events before (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018) and after (January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019) intervention. RESULTS: The root cause analysis included complex treatment plans that could be difficult to interpret, insufficient time to adequately review the designated treatment plans, and the risk of human error given the pace and volume of scheduled injections. Quality improvement strategies included revising the standardized treatment plan documentation template, scheduling block time for injecting physicians to review treatment plans within 24 hours of the injection clinic, and requiring agreement between dual, independent, site, and medication verifications of the treatment plan by the injecting physician and an allied health coordinator before site marking. The rate of events was 0.1% (28 in 27 400, or 9.3 events per year) before intervention and decreased to 0.01% (1 in 9375, or 1 event per year) after intervention (P = 0.01). Most events were classified as near misses, and there were no instances of patient harm. CONCLUSIONS: A high level of patient safety can be achieved in a complex, high-volume intravitreal injection practice by recognizing potential safety issues and root causes and implementing relevant quality improvements. Although most events were near misses and no patients were harmed, reducing near misses can reduce the likelihood of harm associated with never events.

Missed anti-D immune globulin administration to postpartum patients in 2 health systems: an unrecognized patient safety risk.

BACKGROUND: Maternal-fetal Rh-alloimmunization is a rare but potentially fatal event, most often caused by maternal exposure to D-antigen-presenting Rh-positive erythrocytes at the time of delivery. Prophylaxis with anti-D immune globulin is highly effective with a low side-effect profile and results in a dramatically decreased risk of alloimmunization. Postpartum anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis is recommended by national societies to reduce Rh-alloimmunization. We hypothesized that a small number of postpartum patients do not receive prophylaxis as indicated.  . OBJECTIVE: We investigated patients in 2 separate health systems that did not receive indicated prophylaxis and devised a suite of Electronic Health Record interventions to prevent future errors. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed charts retrospectively from Electronic Health Record data of 2 urban academic health systems, the MetroHealth System and Oregon Health & Science University. We identified all Rh-negative postpartum patients and their infants delivering from 2014 to 2019. The primary outcome was the proportion of postpartum patients not receiving indicated anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis. Once cases of missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis were identified, we reviewed individual charts to determine the relevant clinical circumstances and potential causes for error. RESULTS: Of 29,801 deliveries over 5 years (15,444 at MetroHealth System and 14,357 at Oregon Health & Science University), there were 3087 Rh-negative postpartum patients, of whom 7 were alloimmunized and ineligible for prophylaxis. Anti-D immune globulin was indicated for 2162 (70.0%) women as they delivered an Rh-positive infant. A total of 37 indicated patients did not receive postpartum anti-D immune globulin. Twenty patients were offered prophylaxis and declined. We missed a total of 17 opportunities, thus our institutions appropriately offered indicated anti-D prophylaxis to 99.2% of patients over a period of 5 years. Of the 17 true misses, anti-D immune globulin was ordered for some patients, whereas others did not have an anti-D immune globulin order placed. A toolkit in the Electronic Health Record consisting of decision-support hard stops, automated documentation, and longitudinal reporting was implemented at the MetroHealth System in the year after its inception. The Toolkit identified and helped prevent 4 potential misses, resulting in a 100% anti-D prophylaxis rate at the MetroHealth System. CONCLUSION: Given the serious nature of Rh-alloimmunization, we believe missed prophylaxis should be a never event. Through examination of our current processes, we identified areas of improvement and developed a Postpartum Anti-D Immune Globulin Prophylaxis Electronic Health Record Toolkit, which showed improvement in administration rates. Such a toolkit has the potential to identify patients appropriately and avoid missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis events.

Wrong-site tooth extraction removed from the list of NHS never events - implications for OMFS.

Never events that are relevant to OMFS include wrong-site procedures (including tooth extraction), and retained instruments and swabs. In February 2021, the list of never events was updated to exclude wrong tooth extraction, as the systemic barriers to prevent these incidents were not considered 'strong enough.' We discuss the matter, and provide some recommendations to minimise the risk of wrong tooth extraction, which to date has been the commonest never event in the NHS.

Adding a Visual Communication Tool to the Electronic Health Record to Prevent Pressure Injuries.

Health care organizations no longer receive reimbursement for stage 3, stage 4, and unstageable hospital-acquired pressure injuries, which are never events that require interdisciplinary collaboration to treat and prevent. Perioperative patients are at risk for developing pressure injuries that may not manifest until five or more days after surgery. This quality improvement project aimed to inform inpatient nursing and health care professionals of the potential areas of skin breakdown after surgery using an annotated image (AI) depicting intraoperative patient positioning. To gauge OR nurses' use of the AI, we tracked image addition to the patient records weekly from May 2018 to May 2019 and found an overall average participation rate of 80% to 90%. Adding the AI of surgical positioning and pressure points raised awareness of the potential for skin breakdown and became a valuable communication tool for the inpatient nurses who were providing postoperative care to prevent pressure injuries.

You Have Control: aviation communication application for safety-critical times in surgery.

High-risk organisations (HRO), including aviation, undergo formal communication training, with emphasis on safety-critical moments. Such training is not widespread or mandatory in healthcare, and while there are many differences both share the 'human element' with circumstances leading to an increased risk of harm. A typical operating theatre consists of an operating surgeon, and an assisting surgeon, roles that may change throughout the course of a procedure. Similarly, a training aircraft or multi-crew cockpit (flight deck) has a pilot in control, or 'pilot flying', and a 'pilot not flying'. Both interact with wider teams, for example the scrub team and air traffic controllers, respectively. Surgical error is the second most prevalent cause of preventable harm to patients after drug errors. Every year in the UK National Health Service (NHS), there are typically 500 never events, 21,000 serious incidents, and many more episodes of physical or psychological harm. Ineffective communication (46%) is the most common behavioural factor leading to a never event. In this review, we examine the concept of 'sterile cockpit', use of unambiguous terminology, callsigns, important information readback, sharing of mental models, and the mini-brief, and how these may be used to reduce patient harm during safety-critical moments.

Implementation of "local safety standards for invasive procedures (LocSSIPs)" policy: not merely a tick-box exercise in patient safety.

The importance of patient safety in medicine and dentistry cannot be understated. Wrong tooth extractions account for approximately 25% of wrong-site surgery, and the implications for the patient, the team, and the institution can be profound. The development of national safety standards for invasive procedures (NatSSIPs) has led to the introduction of specialty-specific local safety standards for invasive procedures (LocSSIPs), with the aim of improving safety further. The implementation of outpatient LocSSIPs is recommended in clinical dentistry when surgical interventions regularly take place. We have implemented an outpatient LocSSIPs checklist for all procedures done under local anaesthesia in the oral and maxillofacial surgical unit of a large district general hospital. Feedback from a staff survey six months after its introduction was positive from both clinicians and nursing staff. Since its implementation 18 months ago no serious incidents have been reported and staff think that safety has improved. The reporting of incidents, for example, missing clinical notes and faulty equipment, has become more common (showing better awareness) and the development of a team-led approach has improved the running of the department.

A literature review exploring common factors contributing to Never Events in surgery.

This literature review explores some common factors contributing to Never Events in surgery. Despite significant patient safety efforts, serious preventable surgical events that turn into Never Events continue to exist. Various search databases were used to collect relevant contemporary data within the time parameters 2008-2019. The literature revealed numerous studies from the United States of America and worldwide, and the need for more current research from the United Kingdom on the subject. The key findings emphasise that communication failure, situational awareness, fatigue, lack of healthcare professionals and surgical caseload are common contributing factors to Never Events. The implications of these findings for practice highlight that despite multidisciplinary approaches, technologies, policies and strategies, Never Events are a common phenomenon in surgery. To minimise their occurrence, more robust and reliable safety management systems need to be in place within healthcare organisations. In depth understanding of cognitive Human Factors and non-technical skills need to be encouraged through education, training and continuous evaluation of success and failure.

Undetected Cortrak tube misplacements in the United Kingdom 2010-17: An audit of trace interpretation.

OBJECTIVES: Determine why Cortrak-guided, undetected tube misplacement may occur in relation to the system of trace interpretation used. METHODOLOGY: From 2010 to 2017 we obtained seven of the eight Cortrak traces from the United Kingdom where misplacement was undetected and the patient received feed. Seven suffered serious harm. Each misplacement was interpreted by three systems: screen position, manufacturer guidance and gastrointestinal (GI) flexures. SETTING: National and local records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ability to identify misplacement. RESULTS: Traces that were later identified as misplacements, could not be differentiated from GI position when they wholly or partially: a) overlapped with the GI screen area plotted from historical records (57-71%) or b) met both manufacturer guidance criteria or were confused with receiver misplacement or unusual anatomy and reached the lower left quadrant (14-71%). Conversely, all lung misplacements were identified as unsafe using the GI flexure system. All three systems failed to detect the intra-peritoneal trace. Traces were inconsistently stored by healthcare centres. CONCLUSION: Trace file storage should be mandated by and accessible to relevant health authorisation bodies to improve safety research. Screen position alone and manufacturer guidance fail to consistently differentiate the shape of safe from unsafe traces. GI flexure interpretation appears safer but requires testing in larger studies.

Mismatch 'never events' in hip and knee arthroplasty: a cohort and intervention study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to give estimates of the incidence of component incompatibility in hip and knee arthroplasty and to test the effect of an online, real-time compatibility check. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intraoperative barcode registration of arthroplasty implants was introduced in Denmark in 2013. We developed a compatibility database and, from May 2017, real-time compatibility checking was implemented and became part of the registration. We defined four classes of component incompatibility: A-I, A-II, B-I, and B-II, depending on an assessment of the level of risk to the patient (A/B), and on whether incompatibility was knowingly accepted (I/II). RESULTS: A total of 26 524 arthroplasties were analyzed. From 12 307 procedures that were undertaken before implementation of the compatibility check, 21 class A incompatibilities were identified (real- or high-risk combinations; 0.17%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 0.26). From 5692 hip and 6615 knee procedures prior to implementation of the compatibility check, we found rates of class A-I incompatibility (real- or high-risk combinations unknowingly inserted) of 0.14% (95% CI 0.06 to 0.28) and 0.17% (95% CI 0.08 to 0.30), respectively. From 14 217 procedures after the introduction of compatibility checking (7187 hips and 7030 knees), eight class A incompatibilities (0.06%; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.11) were identified. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our data presents validated estimates of the baseline incidence of incompatibility events for hip and knee arthroplasty procedures and shows that a significant reduction in class A incompatibility events is possible using a web-based recording system. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:960-969.

Leaving a foreign object in the body of a patient during abdominal surgery: still a current problem.

INTRODUCTION: Leaving a foreign object (retained surgical item, or RSI) during surgery involving the abdominal cavity and pelvis minor is a relatively frequent, underestimated phenomenon which is dangerous to the health of the patient and the legal security of the medical personnel. These adverse events are easy to avoid through the use of appropriate means of prevention. The aim of the present paper is the collection of epidemiological data and determination of risk factors, symptomatology, health effects, and prevention methods associated with RSIs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis of global scientific publications in the databases PubMed, ClinicalKey, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Scopus related to the subject of RSIs. RESULTS: The frequency of RSI incidents ranges from 1 to 10 in 10,000 surgeries, which results in at least one case in an average multispeciality hospital on a yearly basis. The items most frequently left behind include soft foreign objects, such as swabs and bandages (90%). Risk factors include emergency surgical procedures, high patient BMI, significant loss of blood during surgery, and neglect in counting the material and surgical tools. The postoperative course, although in many cases asymptomatic, may be complicated by inflammation, bleeding, or perforation, leading to the necessity of a second operation and, in 2 to 4% of cases, even ending in death. Imaging tests are effective diagnostic tools. Effective methods of preventing RSIs are based on checklists and systems for counting and monitoring the location of material and tools. CONCLUSIONS: The globally occurring problem of RSIs requires education of the operating block personnel regarding risk factors and identification with elimination of adverse events of this type. Diagnostics based on imaging should take into account non-specific complaints resulting from a possible oligosymptomatic course. An RSI should not be regarded as a medical error. Changes in the perception of the phenomenon aim aimed at minimising the legal liability of the staff in the event of leaving a foreign object in a patient's body.