The use of bubble charts in analyzing second stage cesarean delivery rates.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of second stage cesarean delivery has been rising globally because of the failure or the anticipated difficulty of performing instrumental delivery. Yet, the best way to interpret the figure and its optimal rate remain to be determined. This is because it is strongly influenced by the practice of other 2 modes of birth, namely cesarean delivery performed before reaching the second stage and assisted vaginal birth during the second stage. In this regard, a bubble chart that can display 3-dimensional data through its x-axis, y-axis, and the size of each plot (presented as a bubble) may be a suitable method to evaluate the relationship between the rates of these 3 modes of births. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct an epidemiologic study on the incidence of second stage cesarean deliveries rates among >300,000 singleton term births in 10 years from 8 obstetrical units and to compare their second stage cesarean delivery rates in relation to their pre-second stage cesarean delivery rates and assisted vaginal birth rates using a bubble chart. STUDY DESIGN: The territory-wide birth data collected between 2009 and 2018 from all 8 public obstetrical units (labelled as A to H) were reviewed. The inclusion criteria were all singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation that were delivered at term (≥37 weeks' gestation). Pre-second stage cesarean delivery rate was defined as all elective cesarean deliveries and those emergency cesarean deliveries that occurred before full cervical dilatation was achieved as a proportion of the total number of births. The second stage cesarean delivery rate and assisted vaginal birth rate were calculated according to the respective mode of delivery as a proportion of the number of cases that reached full cervical dilatation. The rates of these 3 modes of births were compared among the parity groups and among the 8 units. Using a bubble chart, each unit's second stage cesarean delivery rate (y-axis) was plotted against its pre-second stage cesarean delivery rate (x-axis) as a bubble. Each unit's second stage cesarean delivery to assisted vaginal birth ratio was represented by the size of the bubble. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 353,434 singleton cephalic presenting term pregnancies were delivered in the 8 units, and 180,496 (51.1%) were from nulliparous mothers. When compared with the multiparous group, the nulliparous group had a significantly lower pre-second stage cesarean delivery rate (18.58% vs 21.26%; P<.001) but a higher second stage cesarean delivery rate (0.79% vs 0.22%; P<.001) and a higher assisted vaginal birth rate (17.61% vs 3.58%; P<.001). Using the bubble of their averages as a reference point in the bubble chart, the 8 units' bubbles were clustered into 5 regions indicating their differences in practice: unit B and unit H were close to the average in the center. Unit A and unit F were at the upper right corner with a higher pre-second stage cesarean delivery rate and second stage cesarean delivery rate. Unit D and unit E were at the opposite end. Unit C was at the upper left corner with a low pre-second stage cesarean delivery rate but a high second stage cesarean delivery rate, whereas unit G was at the opposite end. Unit C and unit G were also in the extremes in terms of pre-second stage cesarean delivery to assisted vaginal birth ratio (0.09 and 0.01, respectively). Although some units seemed to have very similar second stage cesarean delivery rates, their obstetrical practices were differentiated by the bubble chart. CONCLUSION: The second stage cesarean delivery rate must be evaluated in the context of the rates of pre-second stage cesarean delivery and assisted vaginal birth. A bubble chart is a useful method for analyzing the relationship among these 3 variables to differentiate the obstetrical practice between different units.

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries during instrumental vaginal delivery: An observational study based on 18-years of real-world data.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and secular trends of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in vacuum and forceps deliveries in Norway, both with and without episiotomy. DESIGN: Population-based real-world data collected during 2001-2018. SETTING: Medical Birth Registry Norway. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Nulliparous women with singleton foetuses in a cephalic presentation delivered by either vacuum or forceps (n = 70 783). METHODS: Logistic regression analyses were applied to the OASIS prevalence in six 3-year time periods. Both crude odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: OASIS prevalence. RESULTS: The OASIS prevalence in vacuum and forceps deliveries decreased from 14.8% during 2001-2003 to 5.2% during 2016-2018. The overall reduction between the first and last 3-year time period was 61% (aOR = 0.39, 95% CIs = 0.35-0.43). The only exception to this decreasing trend in OASIS was found in forceps deliveries performed without an episiotomy. The OASIS prevalence was approximately twofold higher in forceps compared to vacuum deliveries (aOR = 1.92, 95% CIs = 1.79-2.05). Performing either a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy was associated with a 45% decrease in the prevalence of OASIS relative to no episiotomy (aOR = 0.55, 95% CIs = 0.52-0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Opting for vacuum rather than forceps delivery in conjunction with a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy could significantly lower the OASIS prevalence in nulliparous women.

The Effect of Sleep Enhancement Educational Program on Maternal Sleep Quality for Nulliparous Pregnant Women: A Randomized-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is a critical period during which women usually do not prefer taking medication. Therefore, non-pharmacological and safe methods are needed to improve sleep quality during pregnancy. This study aims to identify whether an educational program on sleep enhancement for pregnant women has any effect on maternal sleep quality. METHOD: This was a randomized-controlled trial. Pregnant women (N = 181) were divided into two groups, an intervention group (n = 90) and a control group (n = 91). A two-session educational program for the enhancement of sleep quality was provided to the intervention group, whereas solely the routine practices of the hospital were put in place for the control group. RESULTS: The intervention group had a significantly lower mean Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score, and accordingly, better sleep quality than the control group. Participation in the education program was significantly related to sleep quality and accounted for 6% of the total variance in sleep quality (R2 = 0.055) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the educational program on sleep enhancement implemented to improve the sleep quality of pregnant women enhanced maternal sleep quality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL:  clinicaltrials.gov . REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04262349.

Predictive Value of Angle of Progression in Term Nulliparous Women: A Comprehensive Study on Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery Correlation and Clinical Implications.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore the correlation between the angle of progression (AOP) and spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) for term nulliparous women before the onset of labor. Additionally, it evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of AOP in predicting SVD in term nulliparous women. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, data from nulliparous women without contraindications for vaginal delivery, with a singleton pregnancy ≥37 weeks, and before the onset of labor were included. Transperineal ultrasound was performed to collect AOP. The date and mode of delivery were tracked, to assess the correlation between AOP and SVD in term nulliparous women. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of AOP in predicting SVD for term nulliparous women. RESULTS: The SVD-failure (SVD-f) group exhibited a significantly lower AOP compared with the SVD group (88.43° vs 95.72°, P < .001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that AOP was associated with SVD in term nulliparous women (OR = 1.051). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the area under the ROC curve with AOP 84° as the threshold was 0.663, with a sensitivity of 85.25% and specificity of 43.18%. Considering a sensitivity and specificity of 90%, the dual cut-off values for term nulliparous women for SVD were 81° and 104°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A positive correlation was identified between AOP and SVD for nulliparous women after 37 weeks and before the onset of labor. Notably, term nulliparous women with AOP exceeding 104° exhibited a higher probability of SVD.

Effect of 200 µg of gonadorelin hydrochloride at the first GnRH of a CO-Synch program on ovulation rate and pregnancies per artificial insemination in Holstein heifers.

The initial ovulatory response during synchronization programs is often low in dairy heifers, largely due to follicular dynamics and hormonal dynamics. Specifically, the progesterone (P4) concentration at the time of the first GnRH treatment in a breeding program can influence the LH response, often resulting in a suboptimal ovulatory response. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the highest label dose 200 µg (100 µg vs. 200 µg) of GnRH (50 µg of gonadorelin hydrochloride per mL; Factrel, Zoetis Inc. Madison, NJ) at the first GnRH of a 6-d CO-Synch plus P4 device program on ovulatory response and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in first service in Holstein heifers. A total of 1,308 Holstein heifers were randomly allocated at the beginning of a 6-d CO-Synch program at day 0 to receive either i.m. treatment of 100 µg (2CC, n = 655) or 200 µg (4CC, n = 653) of GnRH. Also, at d 0, heifers received an intravaginal insert with 1.38 g of P4 (Eazi-Breed CIDR Cattle Insert, Zoetis Inc.). On day 6, the insert was removed, and i.m. treatment of 25 mg of PGF2α (12.5 mg of dinoprost tromethamine/mL; Lutalyse HighCon Injection, Zoetis Inc.) was administered. On d 7, a second i.m. treatment of 25 mg of PGF2α was given, followed on d 9 by concurrent i.m. treatment of 100 µg of GnRH, and timed AI. A subset of 396 heifers had their ovaries scanned to evaluate ovulatory response, and blood samples were collected to measure the serum concentration of P4 at d 0 and d 6 of the study. The P4 concentrations at d 0 were categorized as low (≤3 ng/mL) or high (>3 ng/mL). The ovulatory response was greater for heifers receiving 4CC than 2CC at d 0 (54.7% vs. 42.8%). The ovulatory response was greater for low P4 than high P4 at d 0 (54.3% vs. 37.8%). However, we did not observe an interaction between treatment and P4 concentrations (low P4 2CC = 48.6% vs. high P4 2CC = 30.0%; low P4 4CC = 60.0% vs. high P4 4CC = 45.5%). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that P4 concentrations at d 0 treatment could predict the ovulatory response, although the area under the curve was only 0.6. As expected, heifers that ovulated had increased P/AI (no = 55.6% vs. yes = 67.7%); however, we found no effect of treatment on P/AI (2CC = 63.3% vs. 4CC = 59.6%), and no interactions between treatment and ovulation and treatment and P4 (high vs. low) for pregnancy outcomes. In summary, P4 concentration and increasing the dose of GnRH at d 0 positively affected ovulatory response in Holstein heifers. However, there was no interaction between treatment and P4 on ovulation and no subsequent impact of GnRH dose on P/AI.

Preeclampsia prediction model using demographic, clinical, and sonographic data in the second trimester of Japanese nulliparous women.

AIM: This study aimed to clarify the factors influencing preeclampsia (PE) development in nulliparous Japanese women and to develop a PE prediction model using second trimester sonographic and clinical data readily available to obstetricians. METHODS: This historical cohort study examined the obstetric records of nulliparous women who delivered at Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital from January 2019 to May 2023. A model was constructed to predict the PE development rate, with a focus on 796 nulliparous women. The assessed outcome was PE, excluding superimposed PE. Data on maternal age, assisted reproductive technology, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery notching, and umbilical artery resistance index were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted on these five factors. RESULTS: The incidence of PE was 4.3% (34/796). Multivariable analysis indicated significant odds ratios for the association of PE with mean arterial pressure (adjusted odds ratio: 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.10) and uterine artery notching (adjusted odds ratio: 6.28, 95% confidence interval: 2.82-14.0) in nulliparous women. The PE prediction formula was established as follows: Probability of PE development (%) = (odds/1 + odds) × 100, odds = ex and x = -11.3 + 0.039 × maternal age (years) + 0.91 × assisted reproductive technology + 0.061 × mean arterial pressure (mmHg) + 1.84 × uterine artery notching + 1.84 × umbilical artery resistance index. The sensitivity and specificity of this model were 58.8% and 84.5%, respectively (area under the curve: 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to provide a prediction formula targeting the Japanese population. Our specialized model for nulliparous women could guide obstetricians to educate women regarding the precise prospect of PE development.

Vacuum-assisted delivery outcomes: is advanced maternal age a factor?

PURPOSE: This study evaluated age-related maternal outcomes of vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries (VAD). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all nulliparous women with singleton VAD in one academic institution. Study group parturients were maternal age ≥ 35 years and controls < 35. Power analysis revealed that 225 women/group would be sufficient to detect a difference in the rate of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears (primary maternal outcome) and umbilical cord pH < 7.15 (primary neonatal outcome). Secondary outcomes were maternal blood loss, Apgar scores, cup detachment, and subgaleal hematoma. Outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2019, 13,967 nulliparas delivered at our institution. Overall, 8810 (63.1%) underwent normal vaginal delivery, 2432 (17.4%) instrumental, and 2725 (19.5%) cesarean. Among 11,242 vaginal deliveries, 10,116 (90%) involved women < 35, including 2067 (20.5%) successful VAD vs. 1126 (10%) women ≥ 35 years with 348 (30.9%) successful VAD (p < 0.001). Rates of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations were 6 (1.7%) with advanced maternal age and 57 (2.8%) among controls (p = 0.259). Cord pH < 7.15 was similar: 23 (6.6%) study group and 156 (7.5%) controls (p = 0.739). CONCLUSION: Advanced maternal age and VAD are not associated with higher risk for adverse outcomes. Older, nulliparous women are more likely to undergo vacuum delivery than younger parturients.

Determination of expression patterns of miR-26a, and preimplantation factor levels for early pregnancy detection in nulliparous and multiparous cows.

For maximum productivity in a dairy farm, the earliest and the most accurate detection of pregnancy is essential. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of expression patterns of miR-26a, and serum Preimplantation Factor (PIF) levels for pregnancy diagnosis during the early pregnancy in nulliparous and multiparous cows. A total of 60 cows (30 nulliparous and 30 multiparous Holstein cows) were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were collected for miR-26a on days 8 and 16 (D8 and D16), and for the PIF on days 10 and 20 (D10 and D20) following insemination (D0). Pregnancies were determined by ultrasonography on the 28th day after insemination. Expression levels of miR-26a determined by qPCR. PIF levels were assessed by using commercial ELISA kits. All data were analyzed by using the MIXED procedure of SPSS. The expression levels of miR-26a were 6.64 folds higher on D16 in pregnant compared to non-pregnant multiparous cows (p < .05). On D8 and D16, miR-26a expression levels were found higher 13 folds in pregnant compared to non-pregnant nulliparous cows (p < .05). Additionally, miR-26a expressions were higher 5.42 folds (p < .05) on D8, 7.19 folds higher (p < .01) on D16 in pregnant nulliparous and multiparous cows, and were 6.30 folds higher (p < .001) on D8 and D16 according to non-pregnant animals. PIF levels were greater in pregnant animals (p < .05). Analyzing miR-26a on D8 might be considered as sufficient in nulliparous cows. Pregnancy detection in multiparous cows can be made on the 16th day with this method. Furthermore, PIF evaluations may be sufficient on D10 in multiparous cows. Besides, PIF levels and miR-26a expression levels might be used safely in field conditions and clinical applications.

Parous women perform less moderate to vigorous physical activity than their nulliparous peers: a population-based study in Denmark.

OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights parous women as a key population for monitoring trends of physical activity (PA). We aimed to estimate the proportion of Danish women non-adhering to WHO PA guidelines in parous women compared with nulliparous women and to describe leisure-time PA intensity in each of these groups. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: This population-based study builds on a sample of 27,668 women aged 16-40 years from the Danish National Health Survey 2021. These data were linked with childbirth data from the Danish National Birth Registry. The primary outcome was self-reported weekly hours of moderate to vigorous leisure-time PA (MVPA) dichotomized into: (i) adhering to WHO guidelines for MVPA or (ii) not adhering to WHO guidelines for MVPA. Binomial regression analysis was used to calculate prevalence proportions (PP) and prevalence proportion ratios (PPR). RESULTS: Of the 27,668 women, a total of 20,022 were included; 9338 (46.6%) parous women and 10,684 (53.4%) nulliparous women. The PP of women non-adhering to WHO PA guidelines was 63.8% (95% CI 62.9-64.8) for parous and 51.3% (95% CI 50.4-52.3) for nulliparous women, corresponding to a PPR of 1.24 (95% CI 1.21; 1.27). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of parous women who did not adhere to WHO PA guidelines for MVPA was 24% higher than that of nulliparous women. This highlights parous women as a subgroup of the adult population at increased risk of non-adherence to WHO PA guidelines. These findings call for future research to inform new strategies aiming to promote PA in parous women.

"Social support and stressful life events: risk factors for antenatal depression in nulliparous and multiparous women".

Nulliparous (pregnant women who are giving birth for the first time) and multiparous (women who have multiple children) may have different concerns, which may be associated with risk of antenatal depression. This study aims to examine the role of social support and stressful life events as risk factors for antenatal depression in nulliparous and multiparous women. The sample included 1,524 pregnant women recruited from an obstetrics setting at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy from two Spanish tertiary-care public hospitals. The sample completed the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the "social support" and "stressful life events" subscales of the Postpartum Depression Predictor Inventory-Revised (PDPI-R). Nulliparous women reported a lower prevalence of depressive symptoms (15.6 percent) compared to multiparous mothers (20.1 percent). In both groups, marriage/partner problems (NP: ß = 0.178, p < .01 vs MP: ß = 0.164, p < .01) and a perceived lack of instrumental support from friends (NP: ß = -0.154, p < .01 vs MP: ß = -0.154, p < .01) were significant risk factors for antenatal depression. However, nulliparous women have more risk factors such as unemployment (ß = 0.096, p < .05), job change (ß = 0.127, p < .01), financial problems (ß = 0.145, p < .01) and lack of instrumental support from partner (ß = -0187, p < .01). For multiparous women, moving (ß = 0.080, p < .05) and lack of instrumental support from family (ß = -0.151, p < .01) were risk factors. These results suggest the critical need for screening and designing preventive interventions adapted and taking into consideration parity to provide more effective health care during pregnancy.

The REDUCED trial: a cluster randomized trial for REDucing the utilization of CEsarean delivery for dystocia.

BACKGROUND: To reduce cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women, guidelines for diagnosing nonprogressive labor have been developed by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. These are mainly based on data from the Consortium for Safe Labor study. The guidelines have not been tested in a clinical trial, so the efficacy and safety of this new approach is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether adoption of new guidelines for diagnosing nonprogressing labor would reduce cesarean delivery rates. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial of a knowledge translation program of the guidelines in 26 Canadian hospitals (13 control sites and 13 intervention sites). The sites included all intrapartum care sites in Alberta that perform cesarean delivery and deliver at least 70 nulliparous women annually. The baseline period started on January 1, 2015. The intervention was initiated at the first intervention site in January 2017. The follow-up period began at the first intervention site in February 2017 and lasted till February 2020. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women with vertex presentation in labor at term. The secondary outcomes included spontaneous vaginal birth and maternal and neonatal safety. The main data source for the primary and secondary outcomes was the Alberta Perinatal Health Program database. The cesarean delivery rates were assessed using repeated measures mixed effects logistic regression applied to individual births. RESULTS: The analysis was based on 45,193 deliveries at intervention sites and 43,725 deliveries at control sites. There was no evidence of a decrease in the rate of cesarean delivery in association with the intervention (baseline-adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [0.85-1.05]; P=.259). The rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery increased slightly (baseline-adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, [1.01-1.18]; P=.024). We did not observe any differences in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women were not reduced by the application of recent guidelines for the diagnosis of nonprogressive labor. Spontaneous vaginal delivery-a secondary outcome-was increased in the intervention group. The intervention appears to be safe.

Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida.

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary cesarean deliveries lead to increased maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortalities. In 2020, Florida had a cesarean delivery rate of 35.9%, the third highest in the nation. An effective quality improvement strategy to reduce overall cesarean delivery rates is to decrease primary cesarean deliveries in low-risk births (nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex). Of note, 3 nationally accepted hospital measures of low-risk cesarean delivery rates include the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex; Joint Commission; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine metrics. Comparing metrics is necessary because accurate and timely measurement is essential to support multihospital quality improvement efforts to reduce low-risk cesarean delivery rates and improve the quality of maternal care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess differences in hospital low-risk cesarean delivery rates in Florida using 5 different metrics of low-risk cesarean delivery rate based on (1) risk methodology, nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex; Joint Commission; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine metrics, and (2) data source, linked birth certificate and hospital discharge records and hospital discharge records only. STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based study of live Florida births from 2016 to 2019 to compare 5 approaches to calculating low-risk cesarean delivery rates. Analyses were performed using linked birth certificate data and inpatient hospital discharge data. The 5 low-risk cesarean delivery measures were defined as follows: nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex birth certificate; Joint Commission-linked used Joint Commission exclusions; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine-linked used Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions; Joint Commission hospital discharge with Joint Commission exclusions; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine hospital discharge with Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions. Nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex birth certificate was based on data from birth certificates and not using linked hospital discharge data. Designated as nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex, it does not exclude other high-risk conditions. The second and third measures (Joint Commission-linked used Joint Commission exclusions and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine-linked used Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions) use data elements from the full-linked dataset to designate nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex and excluded several high-risk conditions. The last 2 measures (Joint Commission hospital discharge with Joint Commission exclusions; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine hospital discharge with Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions) were based on data from hospital discharge data only and not using linked birth certificate data. These measures generally reflect term, singleton, and vertex because parity could not be assessed adequately on hospital discharge data. Hospital differences between these 5 measures were calculated overall and by neonatal intensive care unit level. RESULTS: Overall, the median of hospital low-risk cesarean rates decreased across the measures, from NTSV-BC 30.7%, to Joint Commission linked 29.1%, and Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine hospital discharge 29.2% with a large decrease to Joint Commission hospital discharge 19.4% and Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine hospital discharge 18.1%. A similar trend was seen by neonatal intensive care unit level. For each of the measures, level II had the highest median low-risk cesarean rates (nulliparous. term, singleton, vertex birth certificate) 32.7%, Joint Commission linked (31.4%), Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine linked: 31.1%, Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine hospital discharge 19.3%), except for level III Joint Commission hospital discharge (20.0%). A comparison of the median number of low-risk births overall and by neonatal intensive care unit level showed a decreasing number across the linked and hospital discharge measures. Again, a wide gap in low-risk cesarean delivery rates was identified between linked measures and hospital discharge measures. However, this gap narrowed as hospital rates increased. CONCLUSION: Quality monitoring of low-risk cesarean delivery rates measured by the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex metric using the birth certificate was fairly accurate and provided timely assessment for use by Florida hospitals. The nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex birth certificate rates were comparable with low-risk metrics using the linked data source. Overall, metrics used within the same data source had similar rates, with the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine metric having the lowest rates. Across data sources, metrics using hospital discharge data only resulted in substantially underestimated rates because of the inclusion of multiparous women and should be interpreted with caution.

Midwifery care during labor and birth in the United States.

The intrapartum period is a crucial time in the continuum of pregnancy and parenting. Events during this time are shaped by individuals' unique sociocultural and health characteristics and by their healthcare providers, practice protocols, and the physical environment in which care is delivered. Childbearing people in the United States have less opportunity for midwifery care than in other high-income countries. In the United States, there are 4 midwives for every 1000 live births, whereas, in most other high-income countries, there are between 30 and 70 midwives. Furthermore, these countries have lower maternal and neonatal mortality rates and have consistently lower costs of care. National and international evidences consistently report that births attended by midwives have fewer interventions, cesarean deliveries, preterm births, inductions of labor, and more vaginal births after cesarean delivery. In addition, midwifery care is consistently associated with respectful care and high patient satisfaction. Midwife-physician collaboration exists along a continuum, including births attended independently by midwives, births managed in consultation with a physician, and births attended primarily by a physician with a midwife acting as consultant on the normal aspects of care. This expert review defined midwifery care and provided an overview of midwifery in the United States with an emphasis on the intrapartum setting. Health outcomes associated with midwifery care, specific models of intrapartum care, and workforce issues have been presented within national and international contexts. Recommendations that align with the integration of midwifery have been suggested to improve national outcomes and reduce pregnancy-related disparities.

Aspirin delays the onset of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among nulliparous pregnant women: A secondary analysis of the ASPIRIN trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of low-dose aspirin (LDA) starting in early pregnancy on delaying preterm hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. DESIGN: Non-prespecified secondary analysis of a randomised masked trial of LDA. SETTING: The study was conducted among women in the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health's Maternal and Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) clusters, a prospective, population-based study in Kenya, Zambia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Pakistan, India (two sites-Belagavi and Nagpur) and Guatemala. POPULATION: Nulliparous singleton pregnancies between 6+0 weeks and 13+6 weeks in six low-middle income countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, India, Kenya, Pakistan, Zambia) enrolled in the ASPIRIN Trial. METHODS: We compared the incidence of HDP at delivery at three gestational age periods (<28, <34 and <37 weeks) between women who were randomised to aspirin or placebo. Women were included if they were randomised and had an outcome at or beyond 20 weeks (Modified Intent to Treat). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome was pregnancies with HDP associated with preterm delivery (HDP@delivery) before <28, <34 and <37 weeks. Secondary outcomes included small for gestational age (SGA) <10th percentile, <5th percentile, and perinatal mortality. RESULTS: Among the 11 976 pregnancies, LDA did not significantly lower HDP@delivery <28 weeks (relative risk [RR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-1.52); however, it did lower HDP@delivery <34 weeks (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.81) and HDP@delivery <37 weeks (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.90). The overall rate of HDP did not differ between the two groups (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94-1.25). Among those pregnancies who had HDP, SGA <10th percentile was reduced (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.99), though SGA <5th percentile was not (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.64-1.09). Similarly, perinatal mortality among pregnancies with HDP occurred less frequently (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.92) in those receiving LDA. Pregnancies randomised to LDA delivered later with HDP compared with those receiving placebo (median gestational age 38.5 weeks vs. 37.9 weeks; p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: In this secondary analysis of a study of low-risk nulliparous singleton pregnancies, early administration of LDA resulted in lower rates of preterm HDP and delivery before 34 and 37 weeks but not in the overall rate of HDP. These results suggest that LDA works in part by delaying HDP.

The association between episiotomy or OASIS at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women and subsequent prelabor cesarean delivery: A nationwide observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Severe perineal injuries at childbirth affect women's postnatal health, including future childbirths. First births with vacuum extraction carry an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy at vacuum extraction may decrease the risk of OASIS. Our aim was to assess whether lateral or mediolateral episiotomy, or OASIS, at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women is associated with prelabor cesarean delivery in the subsequent childbirth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a nationwide observational study using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, including women having a first birth with vacuum extraction and a second birth in 2000-2014. Both births were live, single, cephalic, ≥34 gestational weeks without malformations. The association between episiotomy or OASIS in the first birth and prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, and interaction analysis. Main outcome measure was prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth. RESULTS: In total, 44 656 women with vacuum extraction at their first birth were included. The rate of prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was 5.9% (824 of 13 950) in women with episiotomy, compared with 6.0% (1830 of 30 706) in women without episiotomy. Thus, women with episiotomy did not have an increased risk of prelabor cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.83-1.20) compared with women without episiotomy. For comparison, the rate of prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was 20.6% (1275 of 6176) in women with OASIS, compared with 3.6% (1379 of 38 480) in women without OASIS (aOR 6.57, 95% CI 5.97-7.23). There was no interaction between episiotomy and OASIS. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women did not increase the risk of prelabor cesarean delivery in the subsequent childbirth. OASIS increased the odds of prelabor cesarean delivery more than sixfold.

Prediction model for successful induction of labor by cervical strain elastography diagnosed at late-term pregnancy in nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The use of cervical strain elastography for nulliparous women during late-term pregnancy remains unclear. This study assesses the predictive value of late-term cervical strain elastography for successful induction of labor (IOL) in nulliparous women. METHODS: This single-centered, prospective study included 86 patients undergoing IOL between January 2020 and March 2022. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify predictive factors for successful IOL. The predictive values were assessed using the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: IOL was successful in 58 patients. The hardness ratio and cervical length were significantly associated with successful late-term IOL in nulliparous women. The predictive value of the combination of hardness ratio and cervical length was higher than that of cervical length alone. CONCLUSIONS: The hardness ratio and cervical length assessed by cervical strain elastography during late-term pregnancy are predictors of the success of IOL in nulliparous women. The predictive value of the combination of hardness ratio and cervical length was higher than that of cervical length alone.

Elective induction of labour at full-term gestations and childhood school outcomes.

AIM: To explore the association between induction of labour at full-term gestations in low-risk nulliparous women and childhood school outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective whole-of-population cohort study linking perinatal data to educational test scores at grades 3, 5 and 7 in Victoria, Australia. Low-risk nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies induced at 39 and 40 weeks without a medical indication were compared to those expectantly managed from that week of gestation. Multivariable logistic regressions were used as well as generalised estimating equations on longitudinal data. RESULTS: At 39 weeks, there were 3687 and 103 164 infants in the induction and expectant arms, respectively. At 40 weeks' gestation, there were 7914 and 70 280 infants, respectively. Infants born to nulliparous women induced at 39 weeks' gestation had significantly poorer educational outcomes at grade 3 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.70) but not grades 5 (aOR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.84-1.33) and 7 (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.81-1.40) compared to those expectantly managed. Infants born to nulliparous women induced at 40 weeks had comparable educational outcomes at grade 3 (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.90-1.25) but poorer educational outcomes at grades 5 (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05-1.43) and 7 (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.47) compared to those expectantly managed. CONCLUSIONS: There were inconsistent associations between elective induction of labour at full-term gestations in low-risk nulliparous women and impaired childhood school outcomes.

Evaluation of an Elective Induction Protocol at a Regional Tertiary Obstetric Care Centre.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of elective induction (EI) at or beyond 39 weeks gestation in the setting of a regional tertiary obstetric care centre. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort feasibility study of low-risk pregnant women who delivered at a regional tertiary obstetric care centre. We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes of low-risk pregnant women who opted for EI at or beyond 39 weeks gestation (n = 112) to a comparison group who opted for expectant management (n = 116). All deliveries occurred between May 1, 2019, and November 30, 2019, and February 15, 2020, and August 15, 2020. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the rates of cesarean deliveries or hypertensive disorders between women who underwent EI and those who chose expectant management. There were also no differences in neonatal outcomes. Women in the EI group received significantly more cervical ripening agents (P < 0.0001) and had significantly longer stays on the antepartum (P < 0.0001) and labour and delivery units (P = 0.0015) but experienced significantly shorter stays on the postpartum unit (P = 0.0368). There was no difference in the total length of hospital stay between groups. CONCLUSIONS: EI protocols can be safely implemented in our regional tertiary obstetric care centre without increased risk of maternal complications or neonatal morbidity. Women considering EI should be adequately counselled on the use of cervical ripening agents and length of stay on antepartum and labour and delivery units.

Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor.

PURPOSE: To determine the validity of intrapartum ultrasound (IPUS), and particularly the angle of progression (AOP), in predicting delivery mode when measured in real-life clinical practice among women with protracted second stages of labor. METHODS: Using electronic medical records, nulliparous women with a second stage of labor of ≥ 3 h ("prolonged") and a documented AOP measurement during the second stage were identified. The ability of a single AOP measurement in "prolonged" second stage to predict a vaginal delivery (VD) was assessed. Fetal head descent, measured by AOP change/h (calculated from serial measurements), was compared between women who delivered vaginally and those who had a cesarean delivery (CD) for arrest of descent. RESULTS: Of the 191 women who met the inclusion criteria, 62 (32.5%) delivered spontaneously, 96 (50.2%) had a vacuum extraction (VE) and 33 (17.3%) had a CD. The mean AOP was wider among women who had VD (spontaneous or VE) compared to those who had CD (153° ± 19 vs. 133° ± 17, p < 0.001). Wider AOPs were associated with higher rates of VD and an AOP ≥ 127° was associated with a VD rate of 88.6% (148/167). Among the 87 women who had more than one AOP measurement, the mean AOP change per hour was higher in the VD group than in the CD group (15.1° ± 11.4° vs. 6.2° ± 6.3°, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-assessed fetal head station in nulliparous women with a protracted second stage of labor can be an accurate and objective additive tool in predicting the mode and interval time to delivery in real-life clinical practice.

Changes in obstetrical practices and pregnancy outcomes following the ARRIVE trial.

BACKGROUND: The ARRIVE trial demonstrated the benefit of induction of labor at 39 weeks gestation. Obstetrics departments across the United States faced the challenge of adapting clinical practice in light of these data while managing logistical constraints. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there were changes in obstetrical practices and perinatal outcomes in the United States after the ARRIVE trial publication. STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of low-risk, nulliparous women who initiated prenatal care by 12 weeks gestation with singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies delivering at ≥39 weeks. Data were obtained from the US Natality database. The pre-ARRIVE group were women who delivered between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. The post-ARRIVE group consisted of women who delivered between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. Births that occurred in 2018 were excluded. Practice outcomes were rates of induction of labor, timing of delivery, and cesarean delivery rate. Adverse maternal outcomes were blood transfusion and admission to medical intensive care unit. Adverse neonatal outcomes were need for assisted ventilation (immediate and >6 hours), 5-minute APGAR score <3, neonatal intensive care unit admission, seizures, and surfactant use. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Trends were tested across the time period represented by the pre-ARRIVE group using Cochran-Armitage trend test. RESULTS: There were 1,966,870 births in the pre-ARRIVE group and 609,322 in the post-ARRIVE group. The groups differed in age, race, body mass index, marital status, infertility treatment, and smoking history (P<.001). After adjusting for these differences, the post-ARRIVE group was more likely to undergo induction (36.1% vs 30.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [1.36-1.37]) and deliver by 39+6 weeks of pregnancy (42.8% vs 39.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 [1.14-1.15]). The post-ARRIVE group had a significantly lower rate of cesarean delivery than the pre-ARRIVE group (27.3 % vs 27.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.94 [0.93-0.94]). Patients in the post-ARRIVE group were more likely to receive a blood transfusion (0.4% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [1.36-1.50]) and be admitted to medical intensive care unit (0.09% vs 0.08%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.20 [1.09-1.33]). Neonates in the post-ARRIVE group were more likely to need assisted ventilation at birth (3.5% vs 2.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [1.26-1.30]) and >6 hours (0.6% vs 0.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [1.31-1.41]). The neonates in the post-ARRIVE group were more likely to have low 5-minute APGAR scores (0.4% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [0.86-0.95]). Neonatal intensive care unit admission did not differ between the 2 groups (4.9% vs 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.01 [0.99-1.03]). There were no differences in neonatal seizures (0.04% vs 0.04%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.97 [0.84-1.13]), and surfactant use (0.08% vs 0.07%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.05 [0.94-1.17]) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There were more inductions of labor, more deliveries at 39 weeks' gestation, and fewer cesarean deliveries in the year after the ARRIVE trial publication. The small but statistically significant increase in some adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes should be explored to determine if they are related with concurrent changes in obstetrical practices.