CSF free light chain identification of demyelinating disease: comparison with oligoclonal banding and other CSF indexes.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) used in immunoglobulin gamma (IgG) index testing and oligoclonal bands (OCBs) are common laboratory tests used in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The measurement of CSF free light chains (FLC) could pose as an alternative to the labor-intensive isoelectric-focusing (IEF) gels used for OCBs. METHODS: A total of 325 residual paired CSF and serum specimens were obtained after physician-ordered OCB IEF testing. CSF kappa (cKFLC) and lambda FLC (cLFLC), albumin and total IgG were measured. Calculations were performed based on combinations of analytes: CSF sum of kappa and lambda ([cKFLC+cLFLC]), kappa-index (K-index) ([cKFLC/sKFLC]/[CSF albumin/serum albumin]), kappa intrathecal fraction (KFLCIF) {([cKFLC/sKFLC]-[0.9358×CSF albumin/serum albumin]^[0.6687×sKFLC]/cKFLC)} and IgG-index ([CSF IgG/CSF albumin]/[serum IgG/serum albumin]). RESULTS: Patients were categorized as: demyelination (n=67), autoimmunity (n=53), non-inflammatory (n=50), inflammation (n=38), degeneration (n=28), peripheral neuropathy (n=24), infection (n=13), cancer (n=11), neuromyelitis optica (n=10) and others (n=31). cKFLC measurement used alone at a cutoff of 0.0611 mg/dL showed >90% agreement to OCBs, similar or better performance than all other calculations, reducing the number of analytes and variables. When cases of demyelinating disease were reviewed, cKFLC measurements showed 86% clinical sensitivity/77% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: cKFLC alone demonstrates comparable performance to OCBs along with increased sensitivity for demyelinating diseases. Replacing OCB with cKFLC would alleviate the need for serum and CSF IgG and albumin and calculated conversions. cKFLC can overcome challenges associated with performance, interpretation, and cost of traditional OCBs, reducing costs and maintaining sensitivity and specificity supporting MS diagnosis.

Variation in processes and reporting of cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal banding and associated tests and calculated indices across Canadian clinical laboratories.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple sclerosis is diagnosed based on clinical and laboratory findings, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oligoclonal banding (OCB) analysis. The lack of updated CSF OCB laboratory guidelines in Canada has likely led to variation in processes and reporting across clinical laboratories. As a first step to developing harmonized laboratory recommendations, we examined current CSF OCB processes, reporting, and interpretation across all Canadian clinical laboratories currently performing this test. DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey of 39 questions was sent to clinical chemists at all 13 Canadian clinical laboratories performing CSF OCB analysis. The survey included questions regarding quality control processes, reporting practices for CSF gel electrophoresis pattern interpretation, and associated tests and calculated indices. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 100%. Most (10/13) laboratories use ≥2 CSF-specific bands (2017 McDonald Criteria) as their CSF OCB positivity cut-off and only 2/13 report the number of bands with every report. Most (8/13 and 9/13) laboratories report an inflammatory response pattern and monoclonal gammopathy pattern, respectively. However, the process for reporting and/or confirming a monoclonal gammopathy varies widely. Variation was observed for reference intervals, units, and the panel of reported associated tests and calculated indices. The maximum acceptable time interval between paired CSF and serum collections varied from 24 h to no limit. CONCLUSIONS: Profound variation exists in processes, reporting, and interpretation of CSF OCB and associated tests and indices across Canadian clinical laboratories. Harmonization of CSF OCB analysis is required to ensure continuity and quality of patient care. Our detailed assessment of current practice variation highlights the need for clinical stakeholder engagement and further data analysis to support optimal interpretation and reporting practices, which will aid in developing harmonized laboratory recommendations.

Determination of sensitivities and specificities of cerebrospinal fluid free light chains to diagnose multiple sclerosis- a multicentric case-control study.

BACKGROUND: CSF free light chains help diagnose multiple sclerosis, but no data is available on the Asian population. Our objective was to study the diagnostic utility of CSF free light chains for diagnosing multiple sclerosis in Indian patients. METHODS: Prospective multicentric case-control study. Cases included those who were tested for oligoclonal bands and fulfilled the modified McDonald criteria 2017 for multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndromes. Those tested for oligoclonal bands (OCB) but with other diagnoses- inflammatory and non-inflammatory were included as controls. Clinical details were collected from electronic medical records. CSF and serum kappa and lambda free light chains were measured, apart from oligoclonal bands, immunoglobulin, and albumin in paired serum and CSF samples. RESULTS: There were 70 patients (31 cases and 39 controls). The mean age was 43.41(SD 16.073) years, and 43(61.4%) were females. CSF kappa showed highest specificity 97.4%, at a cut off 2.06 mg/L (sensitivity 71%) and highest sensitivity 90.3%, at a cut off 0.47 mg/L (specificity 79.5%). Best balance of sensitivity and specificity for CSF kappa was seen at a cut-off of ≥ 0.63 mg/L {sensitivity 87·1 (CI - 70.17-96.37), and specificity 87·18 (CI -72.57-95.70)}. The ratio of Kappa/lambda showed highest specificity of 100%(similar to OCB) with a sensitivity of 71% at a cut off of 1.72. The ratio of sum of kappa and lambda light chains, and Qalb (∑CSF FLC/Qalb), showed the highest specificity (94.87%)among the blood brain barrier corrected ratios. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the diagnostic utility of CSF kappa was comparable to OCB to diagnose multiple sclerosis in sensitivity, but not specificity, so can be a screening test before testing for OCB in our population.

Monitoring oligoclonal immunoglobulins in cerebral spinal fluid using microLC-ESI-Q-TOF mass spectrometry.

Our group has previously shown that mass spectrometry can be used to detect and quantify monoclonal and polyclonal immunoglobulin light chains in serum and urine from patients with monoclonal gammopathies and polyclonal hypergammaglobinemia. Here we demonstrate the use of the methodology, also referred to as monoclonal immunoglobulin Rapid Accurate Mass Measurement\with (miRAMM), to detect oligoclonal immunoglobulins above the polyclonal background in cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and serum. We compared the findings for 56 paired CSF and serum samples analyzed by IgG IEF and miRAMM. The two methods were in agreement with 54 samples having concordant results (22 positive and 34 negative) and 2 that were positive by IgG IEF but negative by miRAMM. In addition to identifying oligoclonal immunoglobulins, miRAMM can be used to quantify and isotype each specific monoclonal immunoglobulin in CSF. This methodology has the potential to transform the way the inflammatory response is monitored in the CNS compartment.