Rare non-epithelial ovarian neoplasms: Pathology, genetics and treatment.

Rare non-epithelial ovarian neoplasms have posed management challenges for many years. Their rarity means that most specialist practitioners will see one such case every several years, and most generalists may never see a case. The first step in management is to establish the correct diagnosis and this may necessitate specialist pathology review. Here, we review recent developments in the pathology, genetics and treatment of small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) and sex cord-stromal tumours. Pathologically, these tumours often display morphological overlap with other neoplasms; for example, SCCOHT overlaps with many other "small round blue cell" tumours. Specific immunohistochemical stains, while useful, may not always be definitive. The discovery of somatic mutations in FOXL2 (adult granulosa cell tumours) and germline and somatic mutations in DICER1 (Sertoli-Leydig cell tumours) and SMARCA4 (SCCOHT) has demonstrated the value of molecular investigation as an adjunct to traditional histopathological approaches. In addition, the presence of germline mutations in a significant proportion of some of these neoplasms points to the need for genetic counselling and testing, offering the prospect of prevention and early diagnosis. Treatment of these rare tumours, as a group, should be on the basis of sound oncological principles, given that level 1 evidence will almost always be lacking. The rationale for experimental therapies must be clearly established. In view of the complex issues involved in the management of these conditions, expert opinion in pathology, genetics and treatment may be essential to offer the patient and her family the best chance of a good outcome.

Analysis of the Safety and Pregnancy Outcomes of Fertility-sparing Surgery in Ovarian Malignant Sex Cord-stromal Tumours: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.

AIMS: To assess the difference in survival between fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) and radical surgery and explore pregnancy outcomes after FSS in stage I malignant sex cord-stromal tumours (MSCSTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a multicentre retrospective cohort study on patients who were diagnosed with MSCSTs and the tumour was confined to one ovary. The patients were divided into FSS and radical surgery groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance variables between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the difference in disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to find risk factors of DFS. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors of pregnancy. RESULTS: In total, 107 patients were included, of whom 54 (50.5%) women underwent FSS and 53 (49.5%) received radical surgery. After IPTW, a pseudo-population of 208 was determined and all of the covariates were well balanced. After a median follow-up time of 50 months (range 7-156 months), 10 patients experienced recurrence and two died. There was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups, both in unweighted (P = 0.969) or weighted cohorts (P = 0.792). In the weighted cohort, stage IC (P = 0.014), tumour diameter >8 cm (P = 0.003), incomplete staging surgery (P = 0.003) and no adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001) were the four high-risk factors associated with a shorter DFS. Among 14 patients who had pregnancy desire, 11 (78.6%) women conceived successfully; the live birth rate was 76.9%. In univariate analysis, only adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.009) was associated with infertility. CONCLUSIONS: On the premise of complete staging surgery, FSS is safe and feasible in early stage MSCSTs with satisfactory reproductive outcomes.

DICER1 pleuropulmonary blastoma familial tumour predisposition syndrome: What the paediatric urologist needs to know.

INTRODUCTION: Germline-inactivating DICER1 mutations are responsible of a familial tumour susceptibility syndrome with an increased risk of tumours, mainly pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB). DICER1 mutations also cause a range of other tumours, some of them in urogenital organs (cystic nephroma [CN], ovarian sex cord-stromal tumours, bladder and cervix embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma [ERMS]). OBJECTIVE: The aim was to clarify the range of urogenital phenotypes associated with DICER1 mutations and to give practical course of action to paediatric urologist that are exposed to DICER1-related conditions. STUDY DESIGN: A literature review was performed. Pertinent papers focused on urogenital diseases associated with DICER1 mutations were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy per cent of CN have a DICER1 germline mutation. The majority of them (80%) have PPB. Like PPB, CN could undergo a malignant progression to a primitive sarcoma. Some rare cases of Wilms tumours were reported. Regarding gonadal manifestations, sex-cord stromal neoplasia of the ovary, especially Sertoli-Leydig cell tumour (SLCT), is the most frequent tumour associated with DICER1 germline mutation. Germline DICER1 mutations also predispose to uterine cervix and bladder ERMS. DISCUSSION: The presence of unusual tumours suggesting DICER1 mutations may alert clinicians. The first step is to obtain a complete familial history. The variable clinical presentation and the modest penetrance raise concerns about the appropriateness of genetic testing to patients and their relatives. The education of DICER1 mutations carriers about tumour-related symptoms is consensual. In the first 5 years of life, a yearly chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasound are recommended. CONCLUSION: The presence of a CN, ovarian SLCT or urogenital ERMS in a child should alert the clinician to the possibility of DICER1 mutation and the associated risk of PPB. Individuals with one of the typical DICER1 conditions should be offered DICER1 analysis. Despite the low penetrance, a genetic counselling and testing should be offered to the family of the affected child.