An Innovative Study Focused on Reducing Unnecessary Oxygen Exposure in Pediatric Patients.

PURPOSE: In the perioperative period, fractional-inspired oxygen is used at values up to 80% to stay within the safe range, even for a short time. A clear value for the safe range has not been specified, and therefore, clinicians prefer a high oxygen value. This study aims to reduce unnecessary oxygen exposure in pediatrice patients and to provide the optimum fractional inspired oxygen value. DESIGN: The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study, including 139 patients aged 1 to 8 years without comorbidity. METHODS: Three groups were formed by adjusting the fractional inspired oxygen to 30%, 50%, or 80% intraoperatively. In the intraoperative period, a strict inspired oxygen protocol (hypoxemia threshold was SpO2 < 90) and oxygen reserve index, fractional expired oxygen value, and peripheral oxygen saturation were used to maintain the balance of hypoxemia and hyperoxemia. FINDINGS: One hundred and nine children were included. The mean oxygen reserve index was significantly lower in the 30% group than in the other groups (0.09 ± 0.05, P < .0001). The mean arterial pressure in the 30% group was significantly lower than the 80% group but within the normal range (78 ± 6 mmHg, P < .003). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding delirium and pain in the recovery unit. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the known and unknown harmful effects of unnecessary oxygen exposure, it may be time to use optimal oxygen and to fear unnecessary oxygen, not less oxygen. As the next step, we think studies should be conducted with patient groups with lower oxygen concentrations (eg, %21 vs %24 vs %30), more patients, and arterial blood gas monitoring.

How early warning with the Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi™) can improve the detection of desaturation during induction of general anesthesia?

The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi™) is a dimensionless parameter with a value between 0 and 1. It is related to the real-time oxygenation status in the moderate hyperoxic range. The purpose of this study is to investigate the added warning time provided by different ORi alarm triggers and the continuous trends of ORi, SpO2, and PaO2. We enrolled 25 patients who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with planned arterial catheterization before induction. The participants received standardized preoxygenation, induction, and intubation. The patients remained apneic and ventilation was resumed when the SpO2 fell below 90%. The ORi and SpO2 were recorded every ten seconds and arterial blood was sampled every minute, from preoxygenation to resumed ventilation. Alarm triggers set to the ORi peak and the ORi 0.55 values provided 300 and 145 s of significant added warning time compared to SpO2 (p < 0.0001). The coefficient of determination was 0.56 between the ORi and the PaO2 ≤ 240 mmHg and showed a positive correlation. The ORi enables the clinicians to monitor the patients' oxygen status during induction of general anesthesia and can improve the detection of impending desaturation. However, further studies are needed to assess its clinical potential in the high hyperoxic range.The protocol was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on July 21, 2021 (NCT04976504).

Effectiveness of preoxygenation by conventional face mask versus non-invasive ventilation in morbidly obese patients: measurable by the oxygen-reserve index?

Preoxygenation is a crucial manoeuvre for patients' safety, particularly for morbidly obese patients due to their reduced pulmonary reserve and increased risk for difficult airway situations. The oxygen reserve index (ORI™) was recently introduced as a new parameter of multiple wavelength pulse oximetry and has been advocated to allow assessment of hyperoxia [quantified by the resulting arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)]. This study investigates if ORI can be used to evaluate the impact of two different preoxygenation manoeuvres on the grade of hyperoxia. Two preoxygenation manoeuvres were sequentially evaluated in 41 morbidly obese patients: First, breathing 100% oxygen for 5 min via standard face mask. Second, after achieving a second baseline, 5 min of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with 100% oxygen. The effect of preoxygenation on ORI compared to PaO2 was evaluated and whether differences in the two preoxygenation manoeuvres can be monitored by ORI. Overall correlation of PaO2 and ORI was significant (Spearman-Rho coefficient of correlation 0.818, p < 0.001). However, ORI could not differentiate between the two preoxygenation manoeuvres although the PaO2 values for NIV preoxygenation were significantly higher compared to standard preoxygenation (median 505 mmHg (M1) vs. 550 mmHg (M3); p < 0.0001). In contrast, ORI values did not differ significantly (median 0.39 (M1) vs. 0.38 (M3); p = 0.758). Absolute values of ORI cannot be used to assess effectiveness of a preoxygenation procedure in bariatric patients, mainly because its range of discrimination is considerably lower than the high ranges of PaO2 attained by adequate preoxygenation. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00025023 (retrospectively registered on April 16th, 2021).

ORi™: a new indicator of oxygenation.

In the perioperative period, hypoxemia and hyperoxia are crucial factors that require attention, because they greatly affect patient prognoses. The pulse oximeter has been the only noninvasive monitor that can be used as a reference of oxygenation in current anesthetic management; however, in recent years, a new monitoring method that uses the oxygen reserve index (ORi™) has been developed by Masimo Corp. ORi is an index that reflects the state of moderate hyperoxia (partial pressure of arterial oxygen [PaO2] between 100 and 200 mmHg) using a non-unit scale between 0.00 and 1.00. ORi monitoring performed together with percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements may become an important technique in the field of anesthetic management, for measuring oxygenation reserve capacity. By measuring ORi, it is possible to predict hypoxemia and to detect hyperoxia at an early stage. In this review, we summarize the method of ORi, cautions for its use, and suitable cases for its use. In the near future, the monitoring of oxygen concentrations using ORi may become increasingly common for the management of respiratory function before, after, and during surgery.

Adjustment of oxygen reserve index (ORi™) to avoid excessive hyperoxia during general anesthesia.

The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi™) is a non-invasive variable that reflects oxygenation continuously. The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and ORi during general anesthesia, and to investigate the usefulness of ORi as an indicator to avoid hyperoxia. Twenty adult patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia with arterial catheterization were enrolled. After induction of general anesthesia, inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) was set to 0.33, and arterial blood gas analysis was performed. The PaO2 and ORi at the time of blood collection were recorded. After that, FiO2 was changed to achieve an ORi around 0.5, 0.2, and 0, followed by arterial blood gas analysis. The relationship between ORi and PaO2 was then investigated using the data obtained. Eighty datasets from the 20 patients were analyzed. When PaO2 was less than 240 mmHg (n = 69), linear regression analysis showed a relatively strong positive correlation (r2 = 0.706). The cut-off ORi value obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve to detect PaO2 ≥ 150 mmHg was 0.21 (sensitivity 0.950, specificity 0.755). Four-quadrant plot analysis showed that the ORi trending of PaO2 was good (concordance rate was 100.0%). Hyperoxemia can be detected by observing ORi of patients under general anesthesia, and thus unnecessary administration of high concentration oxygen can possibly be avoided.

Oxygen reserve index (ORi™) contributes to prediction of hypoxemia and patient safety during tracheal stent insertion using rigid bronchoscopy: a case report.

The oxygen reserve index (ORi™) is a new noninvasive and continuous variable, which represents a moderate hyperoxygenation status, with a unitless scale between 0.00 and 1.00. When percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) exceeds 100%, arterial blood oxygen partial pressure cannot be evaluated without performing arterial blood gas analysis. Because of significant air leakage during rigid bronchoscopy, it is difficult to monitor respiration using capnography, which does not measure end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) accurately. A 66-year-old man (175 cm, 76.8 kg) with a chief complaint of difficulty in breathing was diagnosed with a thyroid tumor. Computed tomography revealed tracheal stenosis due to direct invasion of the thyroid tumor; therefore, tracheal stenting was planned immediately. After supplying 6 L/min oxygen with a face mask and administering 180 mg of propofol intravenously, the supraglottic airway was intubated. General anesthesia (total intravenous anesthesia) through continuous administration of 6-10 mg/kg/h of propofol and intermittent administration of 50 µg of fentanyl (total 200 µg) preserved spontaneous breathing. During tracheal stent insertion, disconnection between the oxygen supply system and rigid bronchoscopy, and tracheal stent expansion, the ORi tended to decrease before SpO2 decreased. Thus, measuring ORi could prevent hypoxemia during tracheal stent insertion using rigid bronchoscopy.

Usefulness of oxygen reserve index (ORi™), a new parameter of oxygenation reserve potential, for rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia.

The oxygen reserve index (ORi™) is a new parameter for monitoring oxygen reserve noninvasively. The aim of this study was to examine the usefulness of ORi for rapid sequence induction (RSI). Twenty adult patients who were scheduled for surgical procedures under general anesthesia were enrolled. After attaching a sensor capable of measuring ORi, oxygen (6 L/min) and fentanyl (2 µg/kg) were administered. After 3 min, propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium 1 mg/kg were administered without ventilation. Regardless of changes in ORi, tracheal intubation was performed either 2 min after administration of propofol or when percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) reached 98%. Ventilation was then provided with oxygen at 6 L/min, and trends in ORi and SpO2 during RSI were observed. Data from 16 of the 20 patients were analyzed. Before oxygen administration, the median SpO2 was 98% [interquartile range (IQR) 97-98] and ORi was 0.00 in all patients. At 3 min after starting oxygen administration, the median SpO2 was 100% (IQR 100-100) and the median ORi was 0.50 (IQR 0.42-0.57). There was an SpO2 decline of 1% or more from the peak value after propofol administration in 13 patients, and 32.5 s (IQR 18.8-51.3) before the SpO2 decrease, ORi began to decline in 10 of the 13 (77%) patients. The ORi trends enable us to predict oxygenation reduction approximately 30 s before SpO2 starts to decline. By monitoring ORi, the incidence related to hypoxemia during RSI could be reduced.

Comparison of the efficacy of two preoxygenation techniques using oxygen reserve index.

BACKGROUND: Preoxygenation is very important to protect the patient from hypoxia before intubation. However, pulse oximetry has some limitations in detecting hypoxia. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of 2 preoxygenation techniques based on oxygen reserve index (ORI) levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty healthy male volunteers were included in the study. They inhaled 100% FiO2 oxygen administered at 5 L/min as the 1st technique (M1) with a ventilation mask as much as their tidal volumes for 3 min. The 2nd technique (M2) applied 100% FiO2 oxygen at 10 L/min flow using the same mask and 8 deep inspiratory volumes, which was aimed to be completed within 1 min. Maximum ORI levels, duration to reach that level, and time needed to reach the target ORI level (0.35) and return back to the "0" were measured. RESULTS: In the M1 group, ORI levels were significantly higher during and after 60 s, according to post hoc tests. In the M2 groups, ORI levels were significantly higher during and after the 4th inspiration, according to post hoc tests. Oxygen reserve index values at the 60th 2nd (M1) and 8th inspiration (M2) were compared as the 8th inspiration corresponded to the 60th second. The maximum ORI values were significantly lower in the M1 group compared to the M2 group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Seven volunteers (36.8%) in the M1 group and 2 volunteers (10.5%) in the M2 group could not reach the target ORI (McNemar's test, test statistic 3.2, degrees of freedom (df) = 1, p = 0.063). The time to reach the target ORI value and to reach maximum ORI values was significantly longer in the M1 group than in the M2 group (p = 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that the 8-deep breath technique is more effective in preoxygenation compared to the 3-min tidal volume technique.