Validation of eligibility criteria for the Japan Obstetric Compensation System for Cerebral Palsy in preterm infants: A case-control cohort study.

AIM: To verify validity of the criteria used for the Japan Obstetric Compensation System for Cerebral Palsy (JOCS-CP) in preterm infants, the association between the criteria and the development of CP was studied using a neonatal database. Our hypothesis was that the criteria would not be sufficient due to the recent advances made in perinatal care. METHODS: Preterm infants born between 2003 and 2019 and registered in the Neonatal Research Network of Japan database with a birth weight of 1500 g or less or a gestational age of less than 32 weeks were analyzed. The database included the clinical information of registered infants during their stay in NICUs and outcomes at 3 years of age. RESULTS: The database included 73 615 infants. After excluding those with an unknown outcome at discharge, 73 464 infants were analyzed for short-term outcomes, including mortality and morbidities. The incidence of CP at 3 years of age was analyzed in 36 151 infants. Furthermore, 16 467 infants born between 28 and 31 weeks of gestation were examined in terms of the validity of the current eligibility criteria. The mortality and incidences of severe intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia significantly decreased during the study period (Cochrane-Armitage test, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the eligibility criteria were not sufficiently nor strongly associated with indicators for detecting perinatal hypoxia-ischemia resulting in CP. CONCLUSION: The existing eligibility criteria of the JOCS-CP used for preterm infants born between 28 and 31 weeks were no longer suitable because of the advances in perinatal care in Japan.

Long-term outcomes of children with neonatal transfer: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

This study aimed to evaluate the association of neonatal transfer with the risk of neurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 years of age. Data were obtained from the Japan Environment and Children's Study. A general population of 103,060 pregnancies with 104,062 fetuses was enrolled in the study in 15 Regional Centers between January 2011 and March 2014. Live-born singletons at various gestational ages, including term infants, without congenital anomalies who were followed up until 3 years were included. Neurodevelopmental impairment was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, third edition (ASQ-3) at 3 years of age. Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted risk and 95% confidence interval (CI) for newborns with neonatal transfer. Socioeconomic and perinatal factors were included as potential confounders in the analysis. Among 83,855 live-born singletons without congenital anomalies, 65,710 children were studied. Among them, 2780 (4.2%) were transferred in the neonatal period. After adjustment for potential confounders, the incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment (scores below the cut-off value of all 5 domains in the ASQ-3) was higher in children with neonatal transfer compared with those without neonatal transfer (communication: 6.5% vs 3.5%, OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.70; gross motor: 7.6% vs 4.0%, OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.49; fine motor: 11.3% vs 7.1%, OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.36; problem solving: 10.8% vs 6.8%, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.48; and personal-social: 6.2% vs 2.9%, OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26-1.83).   Conclusion: Neonatal transfer was associated with a higher risk of neurodevelopmental impairment at 3 years of age. What is Known: • Neonatal transfer after birth in preterm infants is associated with adverse short-term outcomes. • Long-term outcomes of outborn infants with neonatal transfer in the general population remain unclear. What is New: • This study suggests that neonatal transfer at birth is associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. • Efforts for referring high-risk pregnant women to higher level centers may reduce the incidence of neonatal transfer, leading to improved neurological outcomes in the general population.

Outcomes of Infants with Very Low Birth Weight Associated with Birthplace Difference: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Births in Japan and California.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether outcomes among infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) vary according to the birthplace (Japan or California) controlling for maternal ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN: Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and mortality were ascertained for infants with VLBW born at 24-29 weeks of gestation during 2008-2017 and retrospectively analyzed by the country of birth for mothers and infants (Japan or California). RESULTS: Rates of severe IVH, mortality, or combined IVH/mortality were lower in the 24 095 infants born in Japan (5.1%, 5.0%, 8.8% respectively) compared with infants born in California either to 157 mothers with Japanese ethnicity (12.5%, 9.7%, 17.8%) or to a comparison group of 6173 non-Hispanic white mothers (8.4%, 8.8%, 14.6%). ORs for adverse outcomes were increased for infants born in California to mothers with Japanese ethnicity compared with infants born in Japan for severe IVH (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.93-5.68), mortality (3.73; 95% CI, 2.03-6.86), and the combined outcome (3.26; 95% CI, 2.02-5.27). The odds of these outcomes also were increased for infants born in California to non-Hispanic white mothers compared with infants born in Japan. Outcomes of infants born in California did not differ by Japanese or non-Hispanic white maternal ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Low rates of severe IVH and mortality for infants with VLBW born in Japan were not seen in infants born in California to mothers with Japanese ethnicity. Differences in systems of regional perinatal care, social environment, and the quality of perinatal care may partially account for these differences in outcomes.

Understanding Perspectives of African American Medicaid-Insured Women on the Process of Perinatal Care: An Opportunity for Systems Improvement.

Objectives To address disparities in adverse birth outcomes, communities are challenged to improve the quality of health services and foster systems integration. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of Medicaid-insured women about their experiences of perinatal care (PNC) across a continuum of clinical and community-based services. Methods Three focus groups (N = 21) were conducted and thematic analysis methods were used to identify basic and global themes about experiences of care. Women were recruited through a  local Federal Healthy Start (HS) program in Michigan  that targets services to African American women. Results Four basic themes were identified: (1) Pursuit of PNC; (2) Experiences of traditional PNC; (3) Enhanced prenatal and postnatal care; and (4) Women's health: A missed opportunity. Two global themes were also identified: (1) Communication with providers, and (2) Perceived socio-economic and racial bias. Many women experienced difficulties engaging in early care, getting more help, and understanding and communicating with their providers, with some reporting socio-economic and racial bias in care. Delays in PNC limited early access to HS and enhanced prenatal care (EPC) programs with little evidence of supportive transitions to primary care. Notably, women's narratives revealed few connections among clinical and community-based services. Conclusions The process of participating in PNC and community-based programs is challenging for women, especially for those with multiple health problems and living in difficult life circumstances. PNC, HS and other EPC programs could partner to streamline processes, improve the content and process of care, and enhance engagement in services.