A Brain Imaging-Based Diagnostic Biomarker for Periodic Catatonia: Preliminary Evidence Using a Bayesian Approach.

Periodic catatonia (PC) is a psychomotor phenotype with a progressive-remitting course. While it can fit any disorder diagnosis of the schizoaffective spectrum, its core features consist of a mix of hypo- and hyperkinesias resulting in distortions of expressive movements such as grimacing and parakinesias. The replication of cerebral blood flow (CBF) increases in the left supplementary motor area (L-SMA) and lateral premotor cortex (L-LPM) in acute and remitting PC patients indicates that these increases could be used as diagnostic biomarkers. In this proof-of-concept study, 2 different MRI sequences were repeated on 3 separate days to get reliable measurement values of CBF in 9 PC and 26 non-PC patients during different cognitive tasks. Each patient was compared to 37 controls. In L-SMA [-9; +10; +60] and L-LPM [-46; -12; +43], a test was positive if the t value was >2.02 (α < 0.05; two tailed). The measurements had good analytical performance. Regarding the tests, their sensitivities and specificities were significantly different from the chance level on both measures, except for L-SMA sensitivities. When combining all the tests, among regions and methods, sensitivity was 98% (95% credible interval [CI] 76-100%) and specificity 88% (72-97%). Bayesian inferences of its negative predictive values for PC were >95% regardless of the context, while its positive predictive values reached 94% but only when used in combination with clinical criteria. The case-by-case analysis suggests that non-PC patients with neurological motor deficits are at risk to be false positive.

Catatonic syndrome: From detection to therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Catatonia is a psychomotor syndrome which can include motor, mental, behavioral and vegetative symptoms. Exclusively associated with schizophrenia until the 1970s, catatonia still remains an under-diagnosed syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality. LITERATURE FINDINGS: As a result of its different forms and developments, catatonic syndrome can be associated with many organic and psychiatric etiologies and confused with a variety of diagnoses. In addition to its organic complications, malignant catatonia can also be extremely severe. Several diagnostic scales are described, those of Bush and Peralta being the most widely used. Despite the recent development of the DSM-5, we can regret the lack of progress in the international classifications concerning both the recognition of the etiological diversity of this syndrome and in the clinical and therapeutic approaches to it. The diagnosis is based solely on clinical data, and needs to be completed by information from paraclinical settings, particularly with respect to detecting organic etiology. The first-line treatment is still based on the use of certain benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine-like agents such as lorazepam, diazepam and zolpidem. If the first or second line fails, or in case of malignant catatonia, electroconvulsive therapy is recommended. For the periodic form, no large-sample study has been performed on long-term treatment. A few case reports suggest the use of lithium in periodic catatonia, specifically to prevent recurrent episodes or at least to extend the inter-episode intervals. Other studies are in favor of the use of benzodiazepines, with disagreement between gradual discontinuation and long-term treatment. Concerning the management of catatonia in patients with schizophrenia, for whom first-line benzodiazepines are often insufficient, certain atypical antipsychotics such as clozapine or quetiapine appear efficient. These data are also applicable to children and adolescents. CONCLUSION: Often neglected by practitioners, catatonic syndrome remains a common entity of which it is important to be aware, especially in case of rapid installation of the symptoms. Diagnostic scales should be used and a lorazepam test should be performed to avoid delaying the diagnosis. Second-line therapy requires further study. This concerns in particular diazepam, anti-NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) and rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation). Some specificities of catatonia, such as the periodic form and cases in patients with schizophrenia, also require further evaluations.

[Periodic catatonia in schizophrenia spectrum disorders]. / Periodicheskaya katatoniya pri rasstroistvakh shizofrenicheskogo spektra.

OBJECTIVE: Typological differentiation of periodic catatonia in schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), in particular, schizoaffective disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-four patients with the verified diagnosis of schizophrenia and SSD (ICD-10 items F20, F21) were studied. The clinical, psychometric (BFCRS, SANS) and statistical methods were used. Clinical and psychometric study of seizures of periodic catatonia was carried out at the following stages: 1) manifestation of a seizure; 2) the maximum severity of psychopathological disorders. Also, at the end of the seizure, an additional assessment of the severity of negative symptoms was carried out using the SANS. RESULTS: Three forms of periodic catatonia have been identified: hypokinetic, parakinetic, multikinetic. Clinical distinguishing indicators of periodic catatonia seizurs have been established (protracted - two-stage - form of seizures; the phenomenon of «secondary catatonia¼). The psychometric study revealed significant differences between the variants of periodic catatonia seizures in terms of the severity of motor phenomena (at both stages of the seizure) and negative disorders. BFCRS scores at the first stage of seizures were as follows: hypokinetic - 9.7±0.4; parakinetic - 12.8±0.9; multikinetic - 32.3±1.6 (the differences were found between 1 and 2 (p<0.05); between 1 and 3, as well as 2 and 3 (p<0.01)). BFCRS scores at the second stage of seizures were 12.1±0.8; 19.9±1.2 and 47.7±1.9, respectively,with the differences between 1 and 2 (p<0.05); between 1 and 3, and also 2 and 3 (p<0.01). The scores on the SANS anhedonia-asociality subscale were 1.9±0.2 for hypokinetic; 2.3±0.3 for parakinetic and 3.2±0.2 for multikinetic with the differences between 1 and 2, 1 and 3, 2 and 3 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Periodic catatonia is the clinical entity that includes a complex of progressively worsening seizures, the psychopathological systematics of which takes into account the clinical structure of motor disorders, their affiliations with positive and negative dimensions, and functional activity.

Parakinesia: A Delphi consensus report.

Abnormal movements are intrinsic to some forms of endogenous psychoses. Spontaneous dyskinesias are observed in drug-naïve first-episode patients and at-risk subjects. However, recent descriptions of spontaneous dyskinesias may actually represent the rediscovery of a more complex phenomenon, 'parakinesia' which was described and documented in extensive cinematographic recordings and long-term observations by German and French neuropsychiatrists decades before the introduction of antipsychotics. With the emergence of drug induced movement disorders, the description of parakinesia has been refined to emphasize the features enabling differential diagnosis with tardive dyskinesia. Unfortunately, parakinesia was largely neglected by mainstream psychiatry to the point of being almost absent from the English-language literature. With the renewed interest in motor phenomena intrinsic to SSD, it was timely not only to raise awareness of parakinesia, but also to propose a scientifically usable definition for this phenomenon. Therefore, we conducted a Delphi consensus exercise with clinicians familiar with the concept of parakinesia. The original concept was separated into hyperkinetic parakinesia (HPk) as dyskinetic-like expressive movements and parakinetic psychomotricity (PPM), i.e., patient's departing from the patient's normal motion style. HPk prevails on the upper part of the face and body, resembling expressive and reactive gestures that not only occur inappropriately but also appear distorted. Abnormal movements vary in intensity depending on the level of psychomotor arousal and are thus abated by antipsychotics. HPk frequently co-occurs with PPM, in which gestures and mimics lose their naturalness and become awkward, disharmonious, stiff, mannered, and bizarre. Patients are never spontaneously aware of HPk or PPM, and the movements are never experienced as self-dystonic or self-alien. HPk and PPM are highly specific to endogenous psychoses, in which they are acquired and progressive, giving them prognostic value. Their differential diagnoses and correspondences with current international concepts are discussed.

Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard phenotypes of endogenous psychoses: a review of their validity
.

While the ICD-DSM paradigm has been a major advance in clinical psychiatry, its usefulness for biological psychiatry is debated. By defining consensus-based disorders rather than empirically driven phenotypes, consensus classifications were not an implementation of the biomedical paradigm. In the field of endogenous psychoses, the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard (WKL) pathway has optimized the descriptions of 35 major phenotypes using common medical heuristics on lifelong diachronic observations. Regarding their construct validity, WKL phenotypes have good reliability and predictive and face validity. WKL phenotypes come with remarkable evidence for differential validity on age of onset, familiality, pregnancy complications, precipitating factors, and treatment response. Most impressive is the replicated separation of high- and low-familiality phenotypes. Created in the purest tradition of the biomedical paradigm, the WKL phenotypes deserve to be contrasted as credible alternatives with other approaches currently under discussion.
.

Mettre la traduction ES.

Mettre la traduction FR.

A double dissociation between two psychotic phenotypes: Periodic catatonia and cataphasia.

Schizophrenia as a single liability model was confronted to the multiple psychotic phenotypes model proposed by the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard school, focusing on two: periodic catatonia (PC) and cataphasia (C). Both are stable and heritable psychotic phenotypes with no crossed liability and are coming with the buildup of specific residual symptoms: impairment of psychomotricity for PC and a specific disorganization of thought and language in C. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was used as a biomarker. We attempted to refute the single phenotype model by looking at relevant and specific rCBF anomalies for PC and C, that would exceed anomalies in common relative to controls (CTR), i.e. looking for a double dissociation. Twenty subjects with PC, 9 subjects with C and 27 matched controls had two MRI QUIPSS-II arterial spin labeling sequences converted in rCBF. One SPM analysis was performed for each rCBF measurement and the results were given as the conjunction of both analysis. There was a clear double dissociation of rCBF correlates between PC and C, both being meaningful relative to their residual symptomatology. In PC: rCBF was increased in the left motor and premotor areas. In C: rCBF was decreased bilaterally in the temporo-parietal junctions. Conversely, in both (schizophrenia): rCBF was increased in the left striatum which is known to be an anti-psychotics' effect. This evidence refuts the single schizophrenia model and suggests better natural foundations for PC and C phenotypes. This pleads for further research on them and further research on naturally founded psychotic phenotypes. CLINICAL TRIAL: Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Identification: NCT02868879.

Recurrent Idiopathic Catatonia: Implications beyond the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition.

We describe a case of recurrent, life-threatening, catatonic stupor, without evidence of any associated medical, toxic or mental disorder. This case provides support for the inclusion of a separate category of "unspecified catatonia" in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) to be used to classify idiopathic cases, which appears to be consistent with Kahlbaum's concept of catatonia as a distinct disease state. But beyond the limited, cross-sectional, syndromal approach adopted in DSM-5, this case more importantly illustrates the prognostic and therapeutic significance of the longitudinal course of illness in differentiating cases of catatonia, which is better defined in the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard classification system. The importance of differentiating cases of catatonia is further supported by the efficacy of antipsychotics in treatment of this case, contrary to conventional guidelines.

The catatonia conundrum: controversies and contradictions.

Although catatonia is known to psychiatrists for more than a century, it is still poorly understood, often under recognized, have inspired debate and criticism about nosological status of the catatonic syndrome in recent times without reaching its conclusion. It can present with a number of psychiatric and medical illnesses and is easily treatable, though treatment response varies depending upon the underlying condition and can lead on to a multitude of complications, if not treated. Some issues are more than forty catatonic signs are available to scientific audience for diagnosis; threshold number for labelling varies according to the nosological system followed and the underlying condition; and mood stabilizers like carbamazepine and lithium are helpful in some cases of idiopathic periodic catatonia. Researchers have been asking for a separate diagnostic category for catatonia since long and the debate has gained pace over the last few years, with new editions of both DSM and ICD coming up. Therefore, this paper looks at the controversies associated with the diagnosis and classification of catatonia, the arguments and counter-arguments and future directions, in crisp.