Can low-dose intravenous bevacizumab be as effective as high-dose bevacizumab for cerebral radiation necrosis?

Although intravenous bevacizumab (IVBEV) is the most promising treatment for cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN), there is no conclusion on the optimal dosage. Our retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose with low-dose IVBEV in treating CRN associated with radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs). This paper describes 75 patients who were diagnosed with CRN secondary to radiotherapy for BMs, treated with low-dose or high-dose IVBEV and followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The clinical data collected for this study include changes in brain MRI, clinical symptoms, and corticosteroid usage before, during, and after IVBEV treatment. At the 3-month mark following administration of IVBEV, a comparison of two groups revealed that the median percentage decreases in CRN volume on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted gadolinium contrast-enhanced image (T1CE), as well as the signal ratio reduction on T1CE, were 65.8% versus 64.8% (p = 0.860), 41.2% versus 51.9% (p = 0.396), and 37.4% versus 35.1% (p = 0.271), respectively. Similarly, at 6 months post-IVBEV, the median percentage reductions of the aforementioned parameters were 59.5% versus 62.0% (p = 0.757), 39.1% versus 31.3% (p = 0.851), and 35.4% versus 28.2% (p = 0.083), respectively. Notably, the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was higher in the high-dose group (n = 4, 9.8%) than in the low-dose group (n = 0). Among patients with CRN secondary to radiotherapy for BMs, the administration of high-dose IVBEV did not demonstrate superiority over low-dose IVBEV. Moreover, the use of high-dose IVBEV was associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events compared with low-dose IVBEV.

Umbrella review and network meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging test accuracy studies in Differentiating between brain tumor progression versus pseudoprogression and radionecrosis.

PURPOSE: In this study we gathered and analyzed the available evidence regarding 17 different imaging modalities and performed network meta-analysis to find the most effective modality for the differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and post-treatment radiation effects. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive systematic search on PubMed and Embase. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) instrument. For each meta-analysis, we recalculated the effect size, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio from the individual study data provided in the original meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Imaging technique comparisons were then assessed using NMA. Ranking was assessed using the multidimensional scaling approach and by visually assessing surface under the cumulative ranking curves. RESULTS: We identified 32 eligible studies. High confidence in the results was found in only one of them, with a substantial heterogeneity and small study effect in 21% and 9% of included meta-analysis respectively. Comparisons between MRS Cho/NAA, Cho/Cr, DWI, and DSC were most studied. Our analysis showed MRS (Cho/NAA) and 18F-DOPA PET displayed the highest sensitivity and negative likelihood ratios. 18-FET PET was ranked highest among the 17 studied techniques with statistical significance. APT MRI was the only non-nuclear imaging modality to rank higher than DSC, with statistical insignificance, however. CONCLUSION: The evidence regarding which imaging modality is best for the differentiation between radiation necrosis and post-treatment radiation effects is still inconclusive. Using NMA, our analysis ranked FET PET to be the best for such a task based on the available evidence. APT MRI showed promising results as a non-nuclear alternative.

MRI Treatment Response Assessment Maps (TRAMs) for differentiating recurrent glioblastoma from radiation necrosis.

BACKGROUND: MRI treatment response assessment maps (TRAMs) were introduced to distinguish recurrent malignant glioma from therapy related changes. TRAMs are calculated with two contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences and reflect the "late" wash-out (or contrast clearance) and wash-in of gadolinium. Vital tumor cells are assumed to produce a wash-out because of their high turnover rate and the associated hypervascularization, whereas contrast medium slowly accumulates in scar tissue. To examine the real value of this method, we compared TRAMs with the pathology findings obtained after a second biopsy or surgery when recurrence was suspected. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated TRAMs in adult patients with histologically demonstrated glioblastoma, contrast-enhancing tissue and a pre-operative MRI between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. Only patients with a second biopsy or surgery were evaluated. Volumes of the residual tumor, contrast clearance and contrast accumulation before the second surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 339 patients with mGBM who underwent MRI, we identified 29 repeated surgeries/biopsies in 27 patients 59 ± 12 (mean ± standard deviation) years of age. Twenty-eight biopsies were from patients with recurrent glioblastoma histology, and only one was from a patient with radiation necrosis. We volumetrically evaluated the 29 pre-surgery TRAMs. In recurrent glioblastoma, the ratio of wash-out volume to tumor volume was 36 ± 17% (range 1-73%), and the ratio of the wash-out volume to the sum of wash-out and wash-in volumes was 48 ± 21% (range 22-92%). For the one biopsy with radiation necrosis, the ratios were 42% and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Typical recurrent glioblastoma shows a > 20%ratio of the wash-out volume to the sum of wash-out and wash-in volumes. The one biopsy with radiation necrosis indicated that such necrosis can also produce high wash-out in individual cases. Nevertheless, the additional information provided by TRAMs increases the reliability of diagnosis.

Leveraging radiomics and machine learning to differentiate radiation necrosis from recurrence in patients with brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Radiation necrosis (RN) can be difficult to radiographically discern from tumor progression after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The objective of this study was to investigate the utility of radiomics and machine learning (ML) to differentiate RN from recurrence in patients with brain metastases treated with SRS. METHODS: Patients with brain metastases treated with SRS who developed either RN or tumor reccurence were retrospectively identified. Image preprocessing and radiomic feature extraction were performed using ANTsPy and PyRadiomics, yielding 105 features from MRI T1-weighted post-contrast (T1c), T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Univariate analysis assessed significance of individual features. Multivariable analysis employed various classifiers on features identified as most discriminative through feature selection. ML models were evaluated through cross-validation, selecting the best model based on area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score were computed. RESULTS: Sixty-six lesions from 55 patients were identified. On univariate analysis, 27 features from the T1c sequence were statistically significant, while no features were significant from the T2 or FLAIR sequences. For clinical variables, only immunotherapy use after SRS was significant. Multivariable analysis of features from the T1c sequence yielded an AUC of 76.2% (standard deviation [SD] ± 12.7%), with specificity and sensitivity of 75.5% (± 13.4%) and 62.3% (± 19.6%) in differentiating radionecrosis from recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics with ML may assist the diagnostic ability of distinguishing RN from tumor recurrence after SRS. Further work is needed to validate this in a larger multi-institutional cohort and prospectively evaluate it's utility in patient care.

Histopathological correlation of brain tumor recurrence vs. radiation effect post-radiosurgery as detected by MRI contrast clearance analysis: a validation study.

PURPOSE: The differentiation between adverse radiation effects (ARE) and tumor recurrence or progression (TRP) is a major decision-making point in the follow-up of patients with brain tumors. The advent of immunotherapy, targeted therapy and radiosurgery has made this distinction difficult to achieve in several clinical situations. Contrast clearance analysis (CCA) is a useful technique that can inform clinical decisions but has so far only been histologically validated in the context of high-grade gliomas. METHODS: This is a series of 7 patients, treated between 2018 and 2023, for various brain pathologies including brain metastasis, atypical meningioma, and high-grade glioma. MRI with contrast clearance analysis was used to inform clinical decisions and patients underwent surgical resection as indicated. The histopathology findings were compared with the CCA findings in all cases. RESULTS: All seven patients had been treated with gamma knife radiosurgery and were followed up with periodic MR imaging. All patients underwent CCA when the necessity to distinguish tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis arose, and subsequently underwent surgery as indicated. Concordance of CCA findings with histological findings was found in all cases (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on prior studies on GBM and the surgical findings in our series, delayed contrast extravasation MRI findings correlate well with histopathology across a wide spectrum of brain tumor pathologies. CCA can provide a quick diagnosis and have a direct impact on patients' treatment and outcomes.

Comparative analysis of bevacizumab and LITT for treating radiation necrosis in previously radiated CNS neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Radiation necrosis (RN) is a local inflammatory reaction that arises in response to radiation injury and may cause significant morbidity. This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of bevacizumab and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in treating RN in patients with previously radiated central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were screened. Studies of patients with radiation necrosis from primary or secondary brain tumors were included. Indirect meta-analysis with random-effect modeling was performed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included with 210 patients in the bevacizumab group and 337 patients in the LITT group. Bevacizumab demonstrated symptomatic improvement/stability in 87.7% of cases, radiological improvement/stability in 86.2%, and steroid wean-off in 45%. LITT exhibited symptomatic improvement/stability in 71.2%, radiological improvement/stability in 64.7%, and steroid wean-off in 62.4%. Comparative analysis revealed statistically significant differences favoring bevacizumab in symptomatic improvement/stability (p = 0.02), while no significant differences were observed in radiological improvement/stability (p = 0.27) or steroid wean-off (p = 0.90). The rates of adverse reactions were 11.2% for bevacizumab and 14.9% for LITT (p = 0.66), with the majority being grade 2 or lower (72.2% for bevacizumab and 62.5% for LITT). CONCLUSION: Both bevacizumab and LITT exhibited favorable clinical and radiological outcomes in managing RN. Bevacizumab was found to be associated with better symptomatic control compared to LITT. Patient-, diagnosis- and lesion-related factors should be considered when choosing the ideal treatment modality for RN to enhance overall patient outcomes.

Comparative evaluation of outcomes amongst different radiosurgery management paradigms for patients with large brain metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: This study compares four management paradigms for large brain metastasis (LMB): fractionated SRS (FSRS), staged SRS (SSRS), resection and postoperative-FSRS (postop-FSRS) or preoperative-SRS (preop-SRS). METHODS: Patients with LBM (≥ 2 cm) between July 2017 and January 2022 at a single tertiary institution were evaluated. Primary endpoints were local failure (LF), radiation necrosis (RN), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), a composite of these variables, and distant intracranial failure (DIF). Gray's test compared cumulative incidence, treating death as a competing risk with a random survival forests (RSF) machine-learning model also used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: 183 patients were treated to 234 LBMs: 31.6% for postop-FSRS, 28.2% for SSRS, 20.1% for FSRS, and 20.1% for preop-SRS. The overall 1-year composite endpoint rates were comparable (21 vs 20%) between nonoperative and operative strategies, but 1-year RN rate was 8 vs 4% (p = 0.012), 1-year overall survival (OS) was 48 vs. 69% (p = 0.001), and 1-year LMD rate was 5 vs 10% (p = 0.052). There were differences in the 1-year RN rates (7% FSRS, 3% postop-FSRS, 5% preop-SRS, 10% SSRS, p = 0.037). With RSF analysis, the out-of-bag error rate for the composite endpoint was 47%, with identified top-risk factors including widespread extracranial disease, > 5 total lesions, and breast cancer histology. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to conduct a head-to-head retrospective comparison of four SRS methods, addressing the lack of randomized data in LBM literature amongst treatment paradigms. Despite patient characteristic trends, no significant differences were found in LF, composite endpoint, and DIF rates between non-operative and operative approaches.

Impact of concurrent antibody-drug conjugates and radiotherapy on symptomatic radiation necrosis in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: a multicenter retrospective study.

AIM: We aimed to investigate the impact of concurrent antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and radiotherapy on symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases (BM). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study uses four institutional data. Eligibility criteria were histologically proven breast cancer, diagnosed BM with gadolinium-enhanced MRI, a Karnofsky performance status of 60 or higher, and radiotherapy for all BM lesions between 2017 and 2022. Patients with leptomeningeal dissemination were excluded. Concurrent ADC was defined as using ADC within four weeks before or after radiotherapy. The cumulative incidence of SRN until December 2023 with death as a competing event was compared between the groups with and without concurrent ADC. Multivariable analysis was performed using the Fine-Gray model. RESULTS: Among the 168 patients enrolled, 48 (29%) received ADC, and 19 (11%) had concurrent ADC. Of all, 36% were HER2-positive, 62% had symptomatic BM, and 33% had previous BM radiation histories. In a median follow-up of 31 months, 18 SRNs (11%) were registered (11 in grade 2 and 7 in grade 3). The groups with and without concurrent ADC had 5 SRNs in 19 patients and 13 SRNs in 149, and the two-year cumulative incidence of SRN was 27% vs. 7% (P = 0.014). Concurrent ADC was associated with a higher risk of SRN on multivariable analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio, 3.0 [95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.3], P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that concurrent ADC and radiotherapy are associated with a higher risk of SRN in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI for Differentiating Radiation Necrosis From Tumor Progression in Brain Metastasis-Application in a Clinical Setting.

BACKGROUND: High radiation doses of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) can increase the likelihood of radiation necrosis (RN). Advanced MRI sequences can improve the differentiation between RN and tumor progression (TP). PURPOSE: To use saturation transfer MRI methods including chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and magnetization transfer (MT) to distinguish RN from TP. STUDY TYPE: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Seventy patients (median age 60; 73% females) with BM (75 lesions) post-SRS. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, CEST imaging using low/high-power (saturation B1  = 0.52 and 2.0 µT), quantitative MT imaging using B1  = 1.5, 3.0, and 5.0 µT, WAter Saturation Shift Referencing (WASSR), WAter Shift And B1 (WASABI), T1 , and T2 mapping. All used gradient echoes except T2 mapping (gradient and spin echo). ASSESSMENT: Voxel-wise metrics included: magnetization transfer ratio (MTR); apparent exchange-dependent relaxation (AREX); MTR asymmetry; normalized MT exchange rate and pool size product; direct water saturation peak width; and the observed T1 and T2 . Regions of interests (ROIs) were manually contoured on the post-Gd T1 w. The mean (of median ROI values) was compared between groups. Clinical outcomes were determined by clinical and radiologic follow-up or histopathology. STATISTICAL TESTS: t-Test, univariable and multivariable logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic, and area under the curve (AUC) with sensitivity/specificity values with the optimal cut point using the Youden index, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Cohen's d. P < 0.05 with Bonferroni correction was considered significant. RESULTS: Seven metrics showed significant differences between RN and TP. The high-power MTR showed the highest AUC of 0.88, followed by low-power MTR (AUC = 0.87). The combination of low-power CEST scans improved the separation compared to individual parameters (with an AIC of 70.3 for low-power MTR/AREX). Cohen's d effect size showed that the MTR provided the largest effect sizes among all metrics. DATA CONCLUSION: Significant differences between RN and TP were observed based on saturation transfer MRI. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.

Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis comparing imaging modalities.

PURPSOSE: Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN) is often a delayed phenomenon occurring several months to years after the completion of radiation treatment. Differentiating RN from tumor recurrence presents a diagnostic challenge on standard MRI. To date, no evidence-based guidelines exist regarding imaging modalities best suited for this purpose. We aim to review the current literature and perform a diagnostic meta-analysis comparing various imaging modalities that have been studied to differentiate tumor recurrence and RN. METHODS: A systematic search adherent to PRISMA guidelines was performed using Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were determined using a random-effects or fixed-effects proportional meta-analysis based on heterogeneity. Using diagnostic odds ratios, a diagnostic frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was performed, and studies were ranked using P-score hierarchical ranking. RESULTS: The analysis included 127 studies with a total of 220 imaging datasets, including the following imaging modalities: MRI (n = 10), MR Spectroscopy (MRS) (n = 28), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (n = 7), dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (n = 36), MR arterial spin labeling (n = 5), diffusion-weighted imaging (n = 13), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (n = 2), PET (n = 89), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (n = 30). MRS had the highest pooled sensitivity (90.7%). DTI had the highest pooled specificity (90.5%). Our hierarchical ranking ranked SPECT and MRS as most preferable, and MRI was ranked as least preferable. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest SPECT and MRS carry greater utility than standard MRI in distinguishing RN from tumor recurrence.

Radiation necrosis or tumor progression? A review of the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of cerebral radiation necrosis.

PURPOSE: Cerebral radiation necrosis is a complication of radiation therapy that can be seen months to years following radiation treatment. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often difficult and advanced imaging techniques may be needed to make an accurate diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging modalities used in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression following radiation therapy for brain metastases. METHODS: We performed a review of the literature addressing the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. RESULTS: Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains a diagnostic challenge and advanced imaging modalities are often required to make a definitive diagnosis. If diagnostic uncertainty remains following conventional imaging, a multi-modality diagnostic approach with perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission spectroscopy (SPECT), and radiomics may be used to improve diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Several imaging modalities exist to aid in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. Future studies developing advanced imaging techniques are needed.

Toxicity and outcomes of melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: the risk of subsequent symptomatic intralesional hemorrhage exceeds that of radiation necrosis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the outcomes and patterns of toxicity in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without immunotherapy (IO). METHODS: From a prospective registry, we reviewed MBM patients treated with single fraction Gamma Knife SRS between 2008 and 2021 at our center. We recorded all systemic therapies (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy) administered before, during, or after SRS. Patients with prior brain surgery were excluded. We captured adverse events following SRS, including intralesional hemorrhage (IH), radiation necrosis (RN) and local failure (LF), as well as extracranial disease status. Distant brain failure (DBF), extracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using a cumulative Incidence function and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Our analysis included 165 patients with 570 SRS-treated MBM. Median OS for patients who received IO was 1.41 years versus 0.79 years in patients who did not (p = 0.04). Ipilimumab monotherapy was the most frequent IO regimen (30%). In the absence of IO, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2 +) RN was 3% at 24 months and remained unchanged with respect to the type or timing of IO. The incidence of post-SRS g2 + IH in patients who did not receive systemic therapy was 19% at 1- and 2 years compared to 7% at 1- and 2 years among patients who did (HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.98; p = 0.046). Overall, neither timing nor type of IO correlated to rates of DBF, OS, or LF. Among patients treated with IO, the median time to extracranial PFS was 5.4 months (95% IC 3.2 - 9.1). CONCLUSION: The risk of g2 + IH exceeds that of g2 + RN in MBM patients undergoing SRS, with or without IO. IH should be considered a critical adverse event following MBM treatments.

18F-fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression for brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study.

PURPOSE: Distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery represents a common diagnostic challenge. We performed a prospective pilot study to determine whether PET/CT with 18F-fluciclovine, a widely available amino acid PET radiotracer, repurposed intracranially, can accurately diagnose equivocal lesions. METHODS: Adults with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a follow-up tumor-protocol MRI brain equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT of the brain within 30 days. The reference standard for final diagnosis consisted of clinical follow-up until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation. RESULTS: Of 16 patients imaged from 7/2019 to 11/2020, 15 subjects were evaluable with 20 lesions (radiation necrosis, n = 16; tumor progression, n = 4). Higher SUVmax statistically significantly predicted tumor progression (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.011). Lesion SUVmean (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.018), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.813; p = 0.007), and SUVpeak-to-normal-brain (AUC = 0.859; p = 0.002) also predicted tumor progression, whereas SUVmax-to-normal-brain (p = 0.1) and SUVmean-to-normal-brain (p = 0.5) did not. Qualitative visual scores were significant predictors for readers 1 (AUC = 0.750; p < 0.001) and 3 (AUC = 0.781; p = 0.045), but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3). Visual interpretations were significant predictors for reader 1 (AUC = 0.898; p = 0.012) but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3) or 3 (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective pilot study of patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a contemporary MRI brain with a lesion equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT repurposed intracranially demonstrated encouraging diagnostic accuracy, supporting the pursuit of larger clinical trials which will be necessary to establish diagnostic criteria and performance.

Outcomes of intraventricular 131-I-omburtamab and external beam radiotherapy in patients with recurrent medulloblastoma and ependymoma.

PURPOSE: Intraventricular compartmental radioimmunotherapy (cRIT) with 131-I-omburtamab is a potential therapy for recurrent primary brain tumors that can seed the thecal space. These patients often previously received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to a portion or full craniospinal axis (CSI) as part of upfront therapy. Little is known regarding outcomes after re-irradiation as part of multimodality therapy including cRIT. This study evaluates predictors of response, patterns of failure, and radiologic events after cRIT. METHODS: Patients with recurrent medulloblastoma or ependymoma who received 131-I-omburtamab on a prospective clinical trial were included. Extent of disease at cRIT initiation (no evidence of disease [NED] vs measurable disease [MD]) was assessed as associated with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: All 27 patients (20 medulloblastoma, 7 ependymoma) had EBRT preceding cRIT: most (22, 81%) included CSI (median dose 2340 cGy, boost to 5400 cGy). Twelve (44%) also received EBRT at relapse as bridging to cRIT. There were no cases of radionecrosis. At cRIT initiation, 11 (55%) medulloblastoma and 3 (43%) ependymoma patients were NED, associated with improved PFS (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.048) in medulloblastoma. Most relapses were multifocal. With medium follow-up of 3.0 years (95% confidence interval, 1.8-7.4), 6 patients remain alive with NED. CONCLUSION: For patients with medulloblastoma, remission at time of cRIT was associated with significantly improved survival outcomes. Relapses are often multifocal, particularly in the setting of measurable disease at cRIT initiation. EBRT is a promising tool to achieve NED status at cRIT initiation, with no cases of radiation necrosis.

Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma: an analysis of prognostic factors for survival and predictors of radiation necrosis.

PURPOSE: Recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) is a heterogeneous population, and the ideal patient selection for re-irradiation (re-RT) has yet to be established. This study aims to identify prognostic factors for rHGG patients treated with re-RT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adults with rHGG who underwent re-RT from 2009 to 2020 from our institutional database. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included prognostic factors for early death (< 6 months after re-RT) and predictors of radiation necrosis (RN). RESULTS: For the 79 patients identified, the median OS after re-RT was 9.9 months (95% CI 8.3-11.6). On multivariate analyses, re-resection at progression (HR 0.56, p = 0.027), interval from primary treatment to first progression ≥ 16.3 months (HR 0.61, p = 0.034), interval from primary treatment to re-RT ≥ 23.9 months (HR 0.35, p < 0.001), and re-RT PTV volume < 112 cc (HR 0.27, p < 0.001) were prognostic for improved OS. Patients who had unmethylated-MGMT tumours (OR 12.4, p = 0.034), ≥ 3 prior systemic treatment lines (OR 29.1, p = 0.022), interval to re-RT < 23.9 months (OR 9.0, p = 0.039), and re-RT PTV volume ≥ 112 cc (OR 17.8, p = 0.003) were more likely to die within 6 months of re-RT. The cumulative incidence of RN was 11.4% (95% CI 4.3-18.5) at 12 months. Concurrent bevacizumab use (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) and cumulative equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2, α/ß = 2) < 99 Gy2 (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) were independent protective factors against RN. Re-RT allowed for less corticosteroid dependency. Sixty-six percent of failures after re-RT were in-field. CONCLUSION: We observe favorable OS rates following re-RT and identified prognostic factors, including methylation status, that can assist in patient selection and clinical trial design. Concurrent use of bevacizumab mitigated the risk of RN.

VEGFR-TKI treatment for radiation-induced brain injury after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases from renal cell carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: Antiangiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors play an essential role in systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Given the anti-edematous effect of bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors should exert therapeutic effects on radiation-induced brain injury after stereotactic radiosurgery. This preliminary study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor against radiation-induced brain injury. METHODS: Magnetic resonance images for six patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors who were diagnosed with radiation-induced brain injury following gamma knife radiosurgery were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The median brain edema volume and tumour mass volume in the pre-tyrosine kinase inhibitor period were 57.6 mL (range: 39.4-188.2) and 3.2 mL (range: 1.0-4.6), respectively. Axitinib, pazopanib (followed by cabozantinib) and sunitinib were administered in four, one and one cases, respectively. The median brain edema volume and tumour mass volume in the post-tyrosine kinase inhibitor period were 4.8 mL (range: 1.5-27.8) and 1.6 mL (range: 0.4-3.6), respectively. The median rates of reduction in brain edema volume and tumour mass volume were 90.8% (range: 51.9-97.6%) and 57.2% (range: 20.0-68.6%), respectively. The post-tyrosine kinase inhibitor values for brain edema volume (P = 0.027) and tumour mass volume (P = 0.008) were significantly lower than the pre-tyrosine kinase inhibitor values. Changes in volume were correlated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor use. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to demonstrate the therapeutic effects of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors on radiation-induced brain injury in patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma treated via gamma knife radiosurgery.

Expression and distribution of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and vascular endothelial growth factor in comparison between radiation necrosis and tumor tissue in metastatic brain tumor: A case report.

We report the case of a 70-year-old woman with metastatic brain tumors who underwent surgical removal of the tumor and radiation necrosis. The patient had a history of colon cancer and had undergone surgical removal of a left occipital tumor. Histopathological evaluation revealed a metastatic brain tumor. The tumor recurred six months after surgical removal, followed by whole-brain radiotherapy, and the patient underwent stereotactic radiosurgery. Six months later, the perifocal edema had increased, and the patient became symptomatic. The diagnosis was radiation necrosis and corticosteroids were initially effective. However, radiation necrosis became uncontrollable, and the patient underwent removal of necrotic tissue two years after stereotactic radiosurgery. Pathological findings predominantly showed necrotic tissue with some tumor cells. Since the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) were expressed around the necrotic tissue, the main cause of the edema was determined as radiation necrosis. Differences in the expression levels and distribution of HIF-1α and VEGF were observed between treatment-naïve and recurrent tumor tissue and radiation necrosis. This difference suggests the possibility of different mechanisms for edema formation due to the tumor itself and radiation necrosis. Although distinguishing radiation necrosis from recurrent tumors using MRI remains challenging, the pathophysiological mechanism of perifocal edema might be crucial for differentiating radiation necrosis from recurrent tumors.

Presence of Activated (Phosphorylated) STAT3 in Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases.

Brain radiation necrosis (RN) is a subacute or late adverse event following radiotherapy, involving an exacerbated inflammatory response of the brain tissue. The risk of symptomatic RN associated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as part of the treatment of brain metastases (BMs) has been a subject of recent investigation. The activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was shown in reactive astrocytes (RA) associated with BMs. Given that the pathophysiological mechanisms behind RN are not fully understood, we sought to investigate the role of STAT3 among other inflammatory markers in RN development. A mouse model of RN using clinical LINAC-based SRS was designed to induce brain necrosis with the administration of 50 Gy in a single fraction to the left hemisphere using a circular collimator of 5 mm diameter. Immunohistochemistry and multiplex staining for CD4, CD8, CD68, GFAP, and STAT3 were performed. For validation, eleven patients with BMs treated with SRS who developed symptomatic RN and required surgery were identified to perform staining for CD68, GFAP, and STAT3. In the mouse model, the RN and perinecrotic areas showed significantly higher staining for F4/80+ and GFAP+ cells, with a high infiltration of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes, when compared to the non-irradiated cerebral hemisphere. A high number of GFAP+pSTAT3+ and F4/80+pSTAT3+ cells was found in the RN areas and the rest of the irradiated hemisphere. The analysis of human brain specimens showed that astrocytes and microglia were actively phosphorylating STAT3 in the areas of RN and gliosis. Phosphorylated STAT3 is highly expressed in the microglia and RA pertaining to the areas of brain RN. Targeting STAT3 via inhibition represents a promising strategy to ameliorate symptomatic RN in BM patients undergoing SRS.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Centrally Restricted Diffusion Sign in Cerebral Metastatic Disease: Differentiating Radiation Necrosis from Tumor Recurrence.

Purpose: The centrally restricted diffusion sign of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is associated with radiation necrosis (RN) in treated gliomas. Our goal was to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy to distinguish RN from tumor recurrence (TR) in treated brain metastases. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive patients with brain metastases who developed a newly centrally necrotic lesion after radiotherapy (RT). One reader placed regions of interest (ROI) in the enhancing solid lesion and the non-enhancing central necrosis on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Two readers qualitatively assessed the presence of the centrally restricted diffusion sign. The final diagnosis was made by histopathology (n = 39) or imaging follow-up (n = 2). Differences between groups were assessed by Fisher's exact or Mann-Whitney U tests. Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and kappa scores. Results: Forty-one lesions (32 predominant RN; 9 predominant TR) were analyzed. An ADC value ≤ 1220 × 10-6 mm2/s (sensitivity 74%, specificity 89%, area under the curve [AUC] .85 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .70-.94] P < .0001) from the necrosis and an ADC necrosis/enhancement ratio ≤1.37 (sensitivity 74%, specificity 89%, AUC .82 [95% CI, .67-.93] P < .0001) provided the highest performance for RN diagnosis. The qualitative centrally restricted diffusion sign had a sensitivity of 69% (95% CI, .50-.83), specificity of 77% (95% CI, .40-.96), and a moderate (k = .49) inter-reader agreement for RN diagnosis. Conclusions: Radiation necrosis is associated with lower ADC values in the central necrosis than TR. A moderate interobserver agreement might limit the qualitative assessment of the centrally restricted diffusion sign.

Chest wall reconstruction for deep radiation necrosis: case report and overview of surgical options.

INTRODUCTION: To report a case of radiation necrosis after reirradiation for breast cancer and the difficulties encountered when treating these complex cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present an 86-year-old woman with a history of right-sided intraductal breast cancer treated with a right mastectomy followed by local adjuvant radiotherapy (50 Gray). Twelve years later, she was diagnosed with a local recurrence in the mastectomy scar which was treated with local resection (including resection of rib four) and adjuvant radiotherapy up to 32 Gray. In July 2020 she presents at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery with a chronic ulcer on the right-sided hemithorax. RESULTS: A multi-staged, multidisciplinary approach was necessary to secure lasting coverage of the extensive defect. CONCLUSION: Thoracic radiation necrosis should be subject to a multidisciplinary approach (plastic and thoracic surgeons) pre-, per-, and post-operatively. Each case may require a different surgical approach depending on the size and depth of the defect, patients' age, comorbidities, and previous medical treatment.