Mechanical complications and reoperations after adult spinal deformity surgery: a clinical analysis with the GAP score.

PURPOSE: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is prone to postoperative complications, leading to high reoperation rates. The global alignment and proportion (GAP) score is a novel method to predict mechanical complications (MC) based on the optimal parameters related to individual pelvic incidence. The aim of this study was to determine the cut-off point and the predictive value of the GAP score for those MCs that require reoperation. A secondary aim was to investigate the cumulative incidence of MCs requiring reoperation during a long follow-up period. METHODS: In total, 144 ASD patients were operated at our institution due to marked symptomatic spinal deformity between 2008 and 2020. The cut-off point and the predictive value of the GAP score for the MCs that required reoperation and the cumulative incidence of reoperated MCs after index surgery were determined. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were included in the analysis. The risk for having an MC that required reoperation was significantly lower when the postoperative GAP score was < 5 (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.40-9.02). The discriminative power of the GAP score to predict MCs that require reoperation was good with an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.58-0.81). The cumulative incidence of reoperated MCs was 18%. CONCLUSION: The GAP score was associated with the risk for MCs that require reoperation. The best predictive value for surgically treated MC was with the GAP score [Formula: see text] 5. The cumulative incidence of the reoperated MCs was 18%.

Multiple-rod constructs in adult spinal deformity surgery for pelvic-fixated long instrumentations: an integral matched cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: Multiple-rod constructs (Multi-Rod: extra rods for additional pillar support) are occasionally used in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. We aimed to compare and analyze the general outcome of multi-rod constructs with a matched two-rod cohort, to better understand the differences and the similitudes. METHODS: This is a retrospective matched cohort study including patients with ASD that underwent surgical correction with long posterior instrumentation (more than five levels), pelvic fixation and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Matching was considered with demographical data, preoperative radiographical parameters, preoperative clinical status [health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores] and surgical characteristics (anterior fusion, decompression, rod material, osteotomies). Postoperative radiographical and clinical parameters, as well as complications, were obtained. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed regarding postoperative improvement, group variables comparison and parameters correlation. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with multi-rod construct and 33 matched with a two-rod construct were selected from a database with 346 ASD-operated patients. Both groups had a significant improvement with surgical management in the radiographical and HRQoL parameters (p < 0.001). Differences between groups for the postoperative radiographical, clinical and perioperative parameters were not significant. Rod breakage was more frequent in the two-rod group (8 vs 4, p = 0.089), as well as the respective revision surgery for those cases (6 vs 1 p = 0.046). Risk factors related to revision surgery were greater kyphosis correction (p = 0.001), longer instrumentation (p = 0.037) and greater sagittal vertical axis correction (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: No major disadvantage on the use of multi-rod construct was identified. This supports the benefit of using multi-rod constructs to avoid implant failure. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Biomechanical in vitro comparison between anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe sagittal imbalance correction.

PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical effects of anterior column realignment (ACR) and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) on local lordosis correction, primary stability and rod strains. METHODS: Seven cadaveric spine segments (T12-S1) underwent ACR at L1-L2. A stand-alone hyperlordotic cage was initially tested and then supplemented with posterior bilateral fixation. The same specimens already underwent a PSO at L4 stabilized by two rods, a supplemental central rod (three rods) and accessory rods (four rods) with and without adjacent interbody cages (La Barbera in Eur Spine J 27(9):2357-2366, 2018). In vitro flexibility tests were performed under pure moments in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) to determine the range of motion (RoM), while measuring the rod strains with strain gauge rosettes. RESULTS: Local lordosis correction with ACR (24.7° ± 3.7°) and PSO (25.1° ± 3.9°) was similar. Bilateral fixation significantly reduced the RoM (FE: 31%, LB: 2%, AR: 18%), providing a stability consistent with PSO constructs (p > 0.05); however, it demonstrates significantly higher rod strains compared to PSO constructs with lateral accessory rods and interbody cages in FE and AR (p < 0.05), while being comparable in FE or slightly higher in AR compared to PSO constructs with two and three rods. CONCLUSION: Bilateral posterior fixation is highly recommended following ACR to provide adequate primary stability. However, primary rod strains in ACR were found comparable or higher than weak PSO construct associated with frequent rod failure; therefore, caution is recommended. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Biomechanical advantages of supplemental accessory and satellite rods with and without interbody cages implantation for the stabilization of pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of anterior interbody cages, accessory and satellite rods usage on primary stability and rod strains for PSO stabilization. METHODS: Seven human cadaveric spine segments (T12-S1) underwent PSO at L4 with posterior fixation from L2 to S1. In vitro flexibility tests were performed under pure moments in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) to determine the range of motion, while measuring the strains on the primary rods with strain gauge rosettes. Six constructs with 2, 3 and 4 rods, with and without interbody cages implantation adjacent to the PSO site, were compared. RESULTS: All constructs had comparable effects in reducing spine kinematics compared to the intact condition (- 94% in FE and LB; - 80% in AR). Supplementation of 2 rods with lateral accessory rods (4 rods) was the most effective strategy in minimizing primary rod strains, particularly when coupled to cages (p ≤ 0.005; - 50% in FE, - 42% in AR and - 11% in LB); even without cages, the strains were significantly reduced (p ≤ 0.009; - 26%, - 37%, - 9%). The addition of a central satellite rod with laminar hooks (3 rods) effectively reduced rod strains in FE (p ≤ 0.005; - 30%) only in combination with cages. CONCLUSIONS: The study supports the current clinical practice providing a strong biomechanical rationale to recommend 4-rod constructs based on accessory rods combined with cages adjacent to PSO site. Although weaker, the usage of accessory rods without cages and of a central satellite rod with hooks in combination with interbody spacers may also be justified. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Frequency and management of rod fractures following minimally invasive bipolar fusionless surgery in neuromuscular scoliosis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) is associated with an abnormal muscle tone. Traditional conservative treatments, with the historical practice of early posterior fusion, have proven ineffective. Recently, growth-sparing techniques have gained traction owing to their ability to maximize trunk height. However, these techniques have a substantial risk of complications, particularly rod breakage, with reported incidence rates ranging from 15 % to 42 %. The objective of this study was to conduct a descriptive analysis of NMS patients who experienced rod breakage following the minimally invasive fusionless surgery (MIFS) technique. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study that included all NMS patients who underwent surgery between January 2015 and January 2021 and subsequently presented with rod breakage after MIFS. The MIFS technique is based on proximal fixation with double hook claws made of pedicular and -sus laminar hooks and pelvic fixation with iliosacral screws. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 5.2 ± 2.2 years. The mean dominant etiology of NMS was cerebral palsy (67 %). Of the 217 patients who underwent surgery, 15 (6.9 %) developed rod breakage. Rod breakage occurred 2.7 ± 1.3 years after the initial surgery. Four cases of rod fracture recurrence were reported in ambulatory patients with dystonia or hyperactivity. CONCLUSION: Compared with other fusionless techniques, the minimally invasive bipolar technique appears promising for patients with NMS, with a lower rate of rod breakage. We recommend the use of a four-rod construct for ambulatory patients or for those with dystonia or hyperactivity.

Analysis of Mechanical Failure Using the GAP Score After Surgery With Lateral and Posterior Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score and mechanical failure (MF) following corrective fusion surgery with planned 2-stage surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS: Fifty-four patients (2 men, 52 females, aged 70.3 years) were included. MF, proximal junctional failure (PJF), and rod breakage (RB) occurred in 46.3% (25/54), 22.2% (12/54), and 29.6% (16/54) of patients, respectively. The immediate postoperative GAP scores were compared between patients with MF and without MF (MF+ and MF-, respectively). GAP scores in groups with and without PJF or RB were also compared. RESULTS: Patients were grouped according to the GAP score for spinopelvic alignment: 23 (42.6%) as proportioned, 22 (40.7%) as moderately disproportioned, and 9 (16.7%) as severely disproportioned. The pre- and postoperative spinopelvic parameters did not differ significantly between the MF- and MF+ groups except pelvic incidence. Postoperatively, the mean pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis changed to <10° in both groups. The GAP score and 3 categories of GAP scores did not differ significantly between the PJF- and PJF+ groups or between the RB+ and RB- groups. CONCLUSION: Multiple factors can cause PJF and RB, and the patient's background may affect the ability to use the GAP score to predict MF. Further research may be needed in the future using modified GAP scores with additional factors in ASD patients.

Distraction magnitude and frequency affects the outcome in juvenile idiopathic patients with growth rods: finite element study using a representative scoliotic spine model.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Growth rods are used to limit the progression of scoliosis without restraining the opportunity for the spine to grow. However, major complications like rod breakage, screw loosening, and altered sagittal contour have been encountered. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effect of the magnitude of distraction forces on the T1-S1 growth, maximum von Mises stresses on the rods, sagittal contours, and load at the pedicle screw-bone interface and quantify the maximum stresses on the rod for a period of 24 months using different frequencies of distraction in a representative scoliotic spine model. STUDY DESIGN: A representative finite element model of a juvenile scoliotic spine was used to study the effect of magnitude and frequency of distraction on growth rods. METHODS: A representative scoliotic model was developed and instrumented using proximal foundation, distal foundation, and rods. Part 1: simulation steps comprised 6 months of growth under various distraction forces to analyze effects of distraction force on the biomechanics of the spine and instrument. Part 2: simulation steps comprised 24 months of growth under various intervals of distraction to analyze effects of distraction interval on the propensity of rod fracture. RESULTS: Part 1: an optimal distraction force exists for which the growth is sustained with minimum stress on the rod, lower loads at screw-bone interface, and unaltered sagittal contours. Part 2: the stresses on the rods were highest for 12-month distraction (2 distractions in 2 years) and lowest for 2-month distraction (12 distractions in 2 years). CONCLUSIONS: The data and trend suggest that as the distraction forces vary so do the effects on spinal growth. The results of this study also signify the importance of shorter distraction period in reducing the stresses on the rods.

Are Rib Versus Spine Anchors Protective Against Breakage of Growing Rods?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter, case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risks of rod breakage and anchor complications between distraction-based growing rods with proximal spine versus rib anchors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rod breakage is a known complication of distraction-based growing rod instrumentation. METHODS: A total of 176 patients met inclusion criteria: minimum 2-year follow-up, younger than age 9 years at index surgery, non-Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib distraction-based growing rods, and known anchor locations. Mean follow-up was 56 months (range, 24-152 months). Survival analyses using Cox proportional hazards model (accounting for varying lengths of follow-up) of rod breakage, anchor complications, preoperative Cobb angle, number of growing rods, age, and number of levels instrumented were performed using a significance level of p < .05. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients had rib-anchored growing rods and 142 had spine-anchored growing rods. This analysis found that proximal rib-anchored growing rods have a 23% risk of lifetime rod breakage compared with spine-anchored growing rods (6% vs. 29%) (p = .041) without a significant increase in risk of anchor complications (38% vs. 33%) (p = .117). The number of implanted rods (p = .839), age (p = .649), and number of instrumented levels (p = .447) were not statistically significant regarding rod breakage risk, although higher preoperative Cobb angles were significant (p = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative Cobb angle appears to be the most influential factor in determining whether growing rods break (p = .014). Univariate analysis found that rib anchors were associated with less than one-fourth the risk of rod breakage than spine anchors (p = .04) but multivariate analysis found no significant association between anchors and rod breakage (p = .07). This trend suggests that rib-anchored growing rod systems may be associated with less rod breakage because the system is less rigid as a result of some "slop" at the hook-rib interface, as well as the normal motion of the costovertebral joint.