Afferent loop syndrome 7-years post Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy: An often-forgotten pancreatitis cause. A case report.

Afferent loop syndrome is a rare post-operative complication following upper gastrointestinal bypass surgeries, usually occurring within the first two weeks post-operation. This case report, however, outlines afferent loop syndrome almost a decade post-surgery, which was managed conservatively. A 54-year-old woman presented with a few days' history of epigastric pain, vomiting, and constipation. She had undergone a sleeve gastrectomy and was converted to a Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy for weight loss 9 and 7 years ago, respectively. Serum lipase was elevated at 1410 IU/L. Computed tomography showed high-grade proximal small bowel obstruction, involving the efferent and afferent loops of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The patient was given intravenous rehydration, electrolyte replacement and had a nasogastric tube inserted. She was discharged on day 5 of admission without significant sequelae. Afferent limb syndrome should be considered in patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy who present with pancreatitis, regardless of the time period post-operatively. Future guidelines should further more outline the factors indicated for surgical versus conservative management.

Stone removal by percutaneous papillary balloon dilatation for cystic duct and bile duct stones after cholecystectomy and distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy.

A 71-year-old woman was referred to our department for abdominal pain. She was diagnosed with acute obstructive cholangitis due to cystic duct and bile duct stones after cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. Two years ago, the patient underwent endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment for cystic duct and bile duct stones, however, the stones remained. This time, she was treated with stone removal using percutaneous papillary balloon dilatation (PPBD). Large stones in the common hepatic and bile ducts were crushed by electrohydraulic lithotripsy and then pushed out into the duodenum through the dilated papilla of Vater using a balloon catheter covered with the sheath and cholangioscopy. Stone in the cystic duct was pulled to the common bile duct and pushed to the duodenum. Stone removal using PPBD is an excellent alternative for patients with cystic duct and bile duct stones unable to be treated with endoscopic or laparoscopic stone removal.

Comparison of Postoperative Nutritional Status after Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Using Three Reconstructive Methods: a Multicenter Study of over 1300 Patients.

PURPOSE: Perioperative nutritional status has been reported to be associated with short- and long-term outcomes after surgery in gastric cancer patients. This study compared changes in nutritional status after distal gastrectomy using the Billroth I (BI), Billroth II (BII), and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction techniques in gastric cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 1305 gastric cancer patients who underwent distal gastrectomy at two tertiary hospitals from January 2011 to December 2016 were reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups according to reconstruction type: BI, BII, and RY. We evaluated changes in nutritional parameters including body mass index (BMI), biochemical data, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), nutritional risk index (NRI), and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) preoperatively, and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Total protein, albumin, PNI, and NRI were significantly lower in the BII group than in the BI and RY groups during follow-up (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, reconstruction types were independently related to decreases in BMI (> 10%), low serum protein, albumin, and cholesterol 12 months after surgery. Compared with BI, BII was associated with decreased BMI, low protein, and albumin and RY was associated with decreased BMI and low cholesterol. CONCLUSION: During the first year after gastric cancer surgery, postoperative nutritional status differed according to the reconstruction type; BI resulted in the least weight and nutritional loss, RY yielded results comparable with BI in the nutritional indexes, and BII resulted in the greatest nutritional loss.

Roux-en-Y Gastro-jejunostomy for Complex Leak After the "Nissen" Variant of Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Recently, improvised variants of sleeve gastrectomy SG were reported as alternative bariatric options in patients suffering from both morbid obesity and GERD, including mainly additional anterior or posterior fundoplication over a partially sleeved stomach. METHODS: We present the case of a 29-year-old male patient with a body mass index (BMI) of 46.2 kg/m2 underwent laparoscopic SG with concomitant posterior fundoplication: Nissen-SG (N-SG). At postoperative day (POD) 4, he presented with epigastric pain, nausea, and 40 °C fever. The abdomen was tender with signs of peritonitis. Explorative laparotomy displayed a massive gastric leak with generalized peritonitis. Peritoneal lavage was performed. the patient was transferred to our department for the management of persistent SGL. RESULTS: Initial management comprised total parenteral nutrition and wide-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. Three weeks later, the patient underwent laparoscopic exploration. As shown in the video, at least two leaks were individualized, including one, anterior, catheterized by the pigtails, and the other one, posterior, impossible to reach endoscopically (Fig. 1). A residual abscess, located between the left crus, the pancreas, and the upper edge of the spleen, was evacuated. Eventually, Roux-en-Y gastro-jejunostomy was performed CONCLUSION: The adjunction of a posterior fundoplication may have contributed to the multiple and complex occurrence of SGL. Having an ill-vascularized redundant fundus may have increased ischemia of the GE junction. Moreover, it is more difficult to perform endoscopic treatment in a plicated and sleeved stomach as well.

Initial experience of single-incision plus one port left-side approach totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Single incision plus one port left-side approach (SILS+1/L) totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) is an emerging technique for the treatment of gastric cancer. Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy has a number of potential advantages for patients compared with conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy: relieving postoperative pain, shortening hospital stay and offering a better cosmetic outcome. Nevertheless, there are no previous reports on the use of SILS+1/L TLDG with uncut Roux-en-Y (uncut R-Y) reconstruction. AIM: To investigate the initial feasibility of SILS+1/L TLDG with uncut Roux-en-Y digestive tract reconstruction (uncut R-Y reconstruction) to treat distal gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 21 patients who underwent SILS+1/L TLDG with uncut R-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer were enrolled. All patients were treated at The Second Hospital of Shandong University. Reconstructions were performed intracorporeally with 60 mm endoscopic linear stapler and 45 mm no-knife stapler. The clinicopathological characteristics, surgical details, postoperative short-term outcomes, postoperative follow-up upper gastrointestinal radiography findings and endoscopy results were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: All SILS+1/L operations were performed by SILS+1/L TLDG successfully. The patient population included 13 men and 8 women with a mean age of 48.2 years (ranged from 40 years to 70 years) and median body mass index of 22.8 kg/m2. There were no conversions to open laparotomy, and no other port was placed. The mean operation time was 146 min (ranged 130-180 min), and the estimated mean blood loss was 54 mL (ranged 20-110 mL). The mean duration to flatus and discharge was 2.3 (ranged 1-3.5) and 7.3 (ranged 6-9) d, respectively. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 42 (ranged 30-47). Two patients experienced mild postoperative complications, including surgical site infection (wound at the navel incision) and mild postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade A). Follow-up upper gastrointestinal radiography and endoscopy were carried out at 3 mo postoperatively. No patients experienced moderate or severe food stasis, alkaline gastritis or bile reflux during the follow-up period. No recanalization of the biliopancreatic limb was found. CONCLUSION: SILS+1/L TLDG with uncut R-Y reconstruction could be safely performed as a reduced port surgery.

Application value of enhanced recovery after surgery for total laparoscopic uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after distal gastrectomy.

AIM: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for total laparoscopic uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after distal gastrectomy. METHODS: The clinical data of 42 patients who were divided into an ERAS group (n = 20) and a control group (n = 22) were collected. The observed indicators included operation conditions, postoperative clinical indexes, and postoperative serum stress indexes. Measurement data following a normal distribution are presented as mean ± SD and were analyzed by t-test. Count data were analyzed by χ2 test. RESULTS: The operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and number of patients with conversion to open surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. Postoperative clinical indexes, including the time to initial anal exhaust, time to initial liquid diet intake, time to out-of-bed activity, and duration of hospital stay of patients without complications, were significantly different between the two groups (t = 2.045, 8.685, 2.580, and 4.650, respectively, P < 0.05 for all). However, the time to initial defecation, time to abdominal drainage-tube removal, and the early postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups. Regarding postoperative complications, on the first and third days after the operation, the white blood cell count (WBC) and C reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in the ERAS group were significantly lower than those in the control group. CONCLUSION: The perioperative ERAS program for total laparoscopic uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after distal gastrectomy is safe and effective and should be popularized. Additionally, this program can also reduce the duration of hospital stay and improve the degree of comfort and satisfaction of patients.

The early use of Roux limb as surgical treatment for proximal postsleeve gastrectomy leaks.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is thought to be a simpler and safer operation compared with malabsorptive operations that include an enteric anastomosis. Leakage along the staple line at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) is difficult to treat and is a known complication of sleeve gastrectomy. Nonsurgical treatment methods often fail to heal the leaks and patients often require conversion to other procedures for definitive treatment. We report our experience with conversion to Roux-en-Y anastomosis over the leak site as a treatment option, comparing patients who had early treatment to late intervention. The purpose of the study is to stress the medical and social benefits of early surgical reintervention with conversion to Roux-en-Y anastomosis over the leak site. METHODS: Six patients underwent Roux limb placement over the leak site. Four of the patients had delayed surgery (group A), and the other 2 had early intervention (group B). RESULTS: Patients in group A had a median increase of all medical cost by 500%, whereas the 2 patients who underwent early intervention (group B) had an increase by 200%. The mean time until complete recovery (removal of all drains, adequate oral intake, and return to normal daily activity) in group A was 131.25 days (range 99-165) versus 38 days (range 28-48) in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy over the leak site is an effective technique to treat refractory staple line leakage and can be adopted as early treatment in selected patients after stabilization, thereby reducing the cost and length of hospital stays.

Totally laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: analysis of initial 50 consecutive cases of single surgeon in comparison with totally laparoscopic Billroth I reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY) in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer is a more complicated procedure than Billroth-I (BI) or Billroth-II. Here, we offer a totally laparoscopic simple RY using linear staplers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each 50 consecutive patients with totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with RY and BI were enrolled in this study. Technical safety and surgical outcomes of RY were evaluated in comparison with BI. RESULTS: In all patients, RY gastrectomy using linear staplers was safely performed without any events during surgery. The mean operation time and anastomosis time were 177.0±37.6 min and 14.4±5.6 min for RY, respectively, which were significantly longer than those for BI (150.4±34.0 min and 5.9±2.2 min, respectively). There were no differences in amount of blood loss, time to flatus passage, diet start, length of hospital stay, and postoperative inflammatory response between the two groups. Although there was no significant difference in surgical complications between RY and BI (6.0% and 14.0%), the RY group showed no anastomosis site-related complications. CONCLUSION: The double stapling method using linear staplers in totally laparoscopic RY reconstruction is a simple and safe procedure.

Roux-en-Y reconstruction does not require gastric decompression after radical distal gastrectomy.

AIM: To determine whether routine nasogastric (NG) decompression benefitted patients undergoing radical gastric surgery. METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2008, 519 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer were retrospectively divided into 2 time-period cohorts; those treated with Billroth II (BII) reconstruction in the first 6 years and those with Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction in the last 5 years. In the latter group, the patients were further divided into 2 subgroups; with and without nasogastric decompression. RESULTS: Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the number of anastomotic leaks between the 3 groups. In the tubeless RY group, time to semi-liquid diet was significantly shorter than in the other 2 groups (4.4 d ± 1.4 d vs 7.2 d ± 1.3 d and 5.9 d ± 1.2 d, P = 0.005). The length of postoperative stay was significantly increased in patients with BII reconstruction compared with patients with RY reconstruction with/without NG decompression (15.4 d ± 4.3 d in BIIgroup vs 12.6 d ± 3.1 d in decompressed RY and 11.4 d ± 3.4 d in the tubeless RY group, P = 0.035). The postoperative pneumonia rate was lowest in the tubeless group and highest in the BII group (1.4% vs 4.6%, P = 0.01). Severe sore throat was noted in 59 (20.7%) members of the BII group, 18 (17.4%) members of the decompressed RY group and 6 (4.2%) members of the tubeless RY group. Fewer patients in the tubeless group complained of severe sore throat (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides support for abandoning routine NG decompression in patients undergoing subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy.

WallFlex™ Duodenal Stent Placement in a Gastric Cancer Patient with Malignant Stenosis of a Roux-en-Y Gastrojejunostomy following Distal Gastrectomy.

A 69-year-old Japanese woman with a history of distal gastrectomy with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction for advanced gastric cancer was admitted to our hospital complaining of severe dysphagia. On admission, the patient was only able to take liquids, and a firm, fist-sized tumor was palpable in her left upper abdomen. An endoscopic examination disclosed stenosis of the jejunal limb of the gastrojejunostomy. Abdominal computed tomography revealed that a recurrent tumor, 5.0 cm in diameter, was compressing the jejunal limb of the gastrojejunostomy. A knitted nitinol self-expandable metallic stent (WallFlex™ duodenal stent) was placed endoscopically at the stenotic jejunum from the gastrojejunostomy. The time required for stenting and total endoscopic manipulation was 12 and 35 minutes, respectively. No stent-related complications were observed. The patient could resume oral ingestion 1 day after endoscopic stenting and was discharged on the fifth day after treatment. She survived for 201 days after stenting. She continued oral ingestion for 194 days and stayed at home for 165 days. The WallFlex duodenal stent allows safe endoscopic stenting, even in cases of malignant stenosis of a gastrojejunostomy following distal gastrectomy. This stenting device will extend the indications for endoscopic palliation of gastric cancer patients with gastric outlet stenosis.