Characterization of Entry Pathways, Species-Specific Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Residues Determining Entry, and Antibody Neutralization Evasion of Omicron BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2, and BA.3 Variants.

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants were first detected in November 2021, and several Omicron lineages (BA.1, BA.2, BA.3, BA.4, and BA.5) have since rapidly emerged. Studies characterizing the mechanisms of Omicron variant infection and sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies induced upon vaccination are ongoing by several groups. In the present study, we used pseudoviruses to show that the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) enhances infection of BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2, and BA.3 Omicron variants to a lesser extent than ancestral D614G. We further show that Omicron variants have higher sensitivity to inhibition by soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the endosomal inhibitor chloroquine compared to D614G. The Omicron variants also more efficiently used ACE2 receptors from 9 out of 10 animal species tested, and unlike the D614G variant, used mouse ACE2 due to the Q493R and Q498R spike substitutions. Finally, neutralization of the Omicron variants by antibodies induced by three doses of Pfizer/BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was 7- to 8-fold less potent than the D614G. These results provide insights into the transmissibility and immune evasion capacity of the emerging Omicron variants to curb their ongoing spread. IMPORTANCE The ongoing emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants with an extensive number of spike mutations poses a significant public health and zoonotic concern due to enhanced transmission fitness and escape from neutralizing antibodies. We studied three Omicron lineage variants (BA.1, BA.2, and BA.3) and found that transmembrane serine protease 2 has less influence on Omicron entry into cells than on D614G, and Omicron exhibits greater sensitivity to endosomal entry inhibition compared to D614G. In addition, Omicron displays more efficient usage of diverse animal species ACE2 receptors than D614G. Furthermore, due to Q493R/Q498R substitutions in spike, Omicron, but not D614G, can use the mouse ACE2 receptor. Finally, three doses of Pfizer/BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination elicit high neutralization titers against Omicron variants, although the neutralization titers are still 7- to 8-fold lower those that against D614G. These results may give insights into the transmissibility and immune evasion capacity of the emerging Omicron variants to curb their ongoing spread.

Immunogenicity of an adenovirus-vectored bivalent vaccine against wild type SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron variants in a murine model.

BACKGROUND: The emergence and rapid spread of new mutant strains of SARS-CoV-2 necessitate the development of a new generation vaccine capable of neutralizing a broad range of variants. When the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant emerged, individuals in China had already received an inactivated (INA) or a type 5 adenovirus-vectored (Ad5) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine targeting the wild-type virus. We have recently developed a bivalent recombinant type 5 vaccine targeting both the wild-type strain and the Omicron variant (Ad5-nCoV/O). The objectives of this study were to assess the immunogenicity of the bivalent vaccine as a booster against both the wild type and the Omicron variant. METHODS: In the single immunization model, mice received one intramuscular immunization with monovalent or bivalent Ad5-vectored vaccines targeting both wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron variants. In the prime-boost model, mice were primed intramuscularly with an INA or Ad5-vectored vaccine targeting wild-type SARS-CoV-2, and then boosted intramuscularly or intranasally with heterologous or homologous INA or monovalent or bivalent Ad5-vectored vaccines targeting both wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron variants. The vaccine-induced antibody responses and cellular immune responses were measured using ELISA, pseudovirus-based neutralization assays, the intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and ELISpot. RESULTS: Single-dose prime vaccination with the monovalent and bivalent vaccines elicited robust antibody responses and CD4 + and CD8 + cellular responses against the spike protein of WT and Omicron SARS-CoV-2. Both intramuscular and intranasal boost vaccination with the bivalent Ad5-nCoV/O following a prime with INA or Ad5-vectored vaccines induced strong serum neutralization antibody responses to both wild type and Omicron variants. A heterologous prime-boost vaccination elicited greater neutralization antibody responses than a homologous prime-boost vaccination when mice were boosted with Ad5-vectored vaccines following a prime with INA. Intranasal boost also resulted in significant mucosal IgA responses. CONCLUSION: The bivalent vaccine Ad5-nCoV/O exhibited robust immunogenicity, inducing broad-spectrum cross-neutralizing antibodies and cellular immune responses against both wild type and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2. The results demonstrated the potential of the bivalent vaccine in addressing the challenges posed by emerging SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants.

Protection of COVID-19 Vaccination Against Hospitalization During the Era of Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 Predominance: A Nationwide Case-Control Study Based on the French National Health Data System.

Background: Knowing the duration of effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster doses is essential to providing decision-makers with scientific arguments about the frequency of subsequent injections. We estimated the level of protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations (Omicron BA.4-BA.5) over time after vaccination, accounting for breakthrough infections. Methods: In this nationwide case-control study, all cases of hospitalizations for COVID-19 identified in the comprehensive French National Health Data System between June 1, 2022, and October 15, 2022, were matched with up to 10 controls by year of birth, sex, department, and an individual COVID-19 hospitalization risk score. Conditional logistic regressions were used to estimate the level of protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations conferred by primary and booster vaccination, accounting for history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Results: A total of 38 839 cases were matched to 377 653 controls; 19.2% and 9.9% were unvaccinated, respectively, while 68.2% and 77.7% had received ≥1 booster dose. Protection provided by primary vaccination reached 45% (95% CI, 42%-47%). The incremental effectiveness of booster doses ranged from 69% (95% CI, 67%-71%; ≤2 months) to 22% (95% CI, 19%-25%; ≥6 months). Specifically, the second booster provided an additional protection compared with the first ranging from 61% (95% CI, 59%-64%; ≤2 months) to 7% (95% CI, 2%-13%; ≥4 months). Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection conferred a strong, long-lasting protection (51% ≥20 months). There was no incremental effectiveness of a second booster among individuals infected since the first booster. Conclusions: In the era of Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 predominance, primary vaccination still conferred protection against COVID-19 hospitalization, while booster doses provided an additional time-limited protection. The second booster had no additional protection in case of infection since the first booster.

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants during two outbreaks from March to May 2022 in Quzhou, China.

Limited data are available on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines used in China in real-world outbreaks - especially against Omicron variants in vaccinated individuals. Two outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants - the first involving the sub-lineage BA.2 and the second the BA.1 variant - occurred in Quzhou. Infected people and their close contacts were divided according to vaccination status: unvaccinated, partially vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and boosted. The Cox proportional-hazard regression model was used to estimate the evolving hazard for vaccinated individuals after their first immunization. 138 people had been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant and 13 with the BA.1 variant. Of the 151 infections, 99.34% (150/151) were mild or asymptomatic and 90.07% (136/151) were vaccine breakthrough cases. The total vaccine effectiveness (VE) of partial, full, and booster vaccinations during the two outbreaks was 47.4% (95%CI: 0-93.1%), 28.9% (95%CI: 0-60.2%), and 27.5% (95%CI: 0-58.3%). The VE of booster vaccination against the Omicron BA.1 variant was higher than that for the BA.2 variant. The cumulative hazard began to increase 220 days after the first immunization. The transmissibility of the Omicron BA.2 variant as for BA.1 did not increase in vaccinated individuals; booster vaccination after a primary course substantially increased protection. Our study found that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant caused less severe illness and that the VE of boosters against the Omicron variant was less than 30%. Timely administration of the booster dose was important, especially for individuals aged over 80 years old.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 omicron variants by immunochromatographic kit.

An immunochromatographic kit using antibodies against recombinant N protein of an omicron B.1.1.529 of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was developed to detect SARS-CoV-2 omicron variants. The kit detected omicron variants (BA.1.18, BA.1.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.2.75, BA.4.1, BA.4.6, BE.1, BA.5.2.1, XE, BF.7, BF.7.4.1, XBB.1, XBB.1.5 and BQ.1.1) as well as Wuhan strain and a delta variant.

Further quantitative in silico analysis of SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD Omicron BA.4, BA.5, BA.2.75, BQ.1, and BQ.1.1 transmissibility.

The Covid-19 variants' transmissibility was further quantitatively analyzed in silico to study the binding strength with ACE-2 and find the binding inhibitors. The molecular interaction energy values of their optimized complex structures (MIFS) demonstrated that Omicron BA.4 and 5's MIFS value (344.6 kcal mol-1) was equivalent to wild-type MIFS (346.1 kcal mol-1), that of Omicron BQ.1 and BQ. 1.1's MIFS value (309.9 and 364.6 kcal mol-1). Furthermore, the MIFS value of Omicron BA.2.75 (515.1 kcal mol-1) was about Delta-plus (511.3 kcal mol-1). The binding strength of Omicron BA.4, BA. 5, and BQ.1.1 may be neglectable, but that of Omicron BA.2.75 was urging. Furthermore, the 79 medicine candidates were analyzed as the binding inhibitors from binding strength with ACE-2. Only carboxy compounds were repulsed from the ACE-2 binding site indicating that further modification of medical treatment candidates may produce an effective binding inhibitor.