Osteoporotic vertebral fractures localized in the lumbar area significantly impact sagittal alignment.

Lumbar fractures and/or multiple fractures at the lumbar or thoracolumbar regions are risk factors for sagittal malalignment in patients older than 70 years old. Although patients with OVF show a huge capacity to compensate after the fractures, lumbar and TL lumbar fractures require closer monitoring. PURPOSE: To assess the impact of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on the sagittal alignment of the elderly and identify risk factors for sagittal malalignment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on a cohort of 249 patients older than 70 years old and diagnosed with osteoporosis who suffered chronic vertebral fractures. Demographic and radiological data were collected. Full-spine lateral X-rays were obtained to analyze the sagittal plane. Patients were classified according to the number and location of the fractures. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationships between the type of fractures and sagittal alignment. RESULTS: A total of 673 chronic fractures were detected in 249 patients with a mean number of vertebral fractures per patient of 2.7 ± 1.9. Patients were divided into 9 subgroups according to the location and the number of fractures. Surprisingly, any of the aggregated parameters used to assess sagittal alignment exceeded the threshold defined for malalignment. In the second part of the analysis, 41 patients with sagittal malalignment were identified. In this subpopulation, an overrepresentation of patients with lumbar fractures (34% vs. 11%) and an under-representation of thoracic fractures (9% vs. 34%) were reported. We also observed that patients with 3 or more lumbar or thoracolumbar fractures had an increased risk of sagittal malalignment. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar fractures and/or multiple fractures at the lumbar or thoracolumbar regions are risk factors for sagittal malalignment in patients older than 70 years old. Although patients show a remarkable capacity to compensate, fractures at the lumbar and thoracolumbar regions need closer monitoring.

Association between modic changes, disc degeneration, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch in a large population based cohort: the Wakayama spine study.

PURPOSE: Sagittal plane alignment is crucial for treating spinal malalignment and low back pain. Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch is commonly used to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with sagittal malalignment. The association between PI-LL mismatch and changes surrounding the intervertebral disc is very important to understand the compensatory mechanisms involved. This study aimed to examine the association between PI-LL mismatch and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes surrounding the intervertebral disc in a large population-based cohort. METHODS: We evaluated participants from the second Wakayama Spine Study, recruiting the general population aged 20 years or older, irrespective of sex, who were registered residents in one region in 2014. In total, 857 individuals underwent an MRI of the whole spine; however, 43 MRI results were not included due to incomplete or inadequate quality images. PI-LL mismatch was defined as > 11°. We compared the MRI changes, such as Modic change (MC), disc degeneration (DD), and high-intensity zones (HIZ), between PI-LL mismatch and non-PI-LL mismatch groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association between the MRI changes and PI-LL mismatch with adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index in the lumbar region and at each level. RESULTS: A total of 795 participants (243 men, 552 women, mean age 63.5 ± 13.1 years old) were evaluated; 181 were included in the PI-LL mismatch group. MC and DD in the lumbar region were significantly higher in the PI-LL mismatch group. MC in the lumbar region was significantly associated with PI-LL mismatch (odds ratio (OR); 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.7). MC at each level was significantly associated with PI-LL mismatch (OR; 1.7-1.9, 95%CI 1.1-3.2), and DD at L1/2, L3/4, and L4/5 was associated with PI-LL mismatch (OR; 2.0- 2.4. 95%CI 1.2-3.9). CONCLUSION: MC and DD were significantly associated with PI-LL mismatch. Therefore, profiling MC may be helpful in improving the targeted treatment of LBP associated with the adult spinal deformity.

Radiographic outcomes and complications after L4 or L5 pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal malalignment in 102 adult spinal deformity patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The objective of this retrospective study was to provide the radiographic outcomes and complications for pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) performed at the low lumbar spine, i.e., L4 or L5 for ASD patients with fixed sagittal malalignment. METHODS: ASD patients who underwent L4 or L5 PSO with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs, and complications were collected. Radiographic analysis included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spinal lordosis (SL) ratio and global tilt (GT) on standing long-cassette radiographs. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients from 2 spinal centers were analyzed. 66 patients underwent PSO at L4 and 36 patients at L5. From preoperatively to the final follow-up, significant improvements occurred in LL (from - 31° to - 52°), SVA (from 13 to 5 cm), and GT (from 44° to 27°) (all, p < 0.05). 12 patients had transient neurological deficits, and 8 patients had persistent neurological deficit. 23 patients underwent revision for PJK (2), pseudarthrosis (10), neurological deficit (2), epidural hematoma (1), or deep surgical site infection (8). No PJK was observed in any of the patients with L5 PSO. CONCLUSIONS: PSO at the level of L4 or L5 remains a challenging technique but with an acceptable rate of complications and revisions. It enables correction of fixed sagittal malalignment in ASD patients with a globally satisfactory outcome. In comparison with L4 PSO, L5 PSO patients did not show PJK as a mechanical complication. Distal lumbar PSO at the level of L5 may represent one of the factors that may help preventing the proximal junctional kyphosis complication.

Alterations of gait kinematics depend on the deformity type in the setting of adult spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate 3D kinematic alterations during gait in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) subjects with different deformity presentations. METHODS: One hundred nineteen primary ASD (51 ± 19y, 90F), age and sex-matched to 60 controls, underwent 3D gait analysis with subsequent calculation of 3D lower limb, trunk and segmental spine kinematics as well as the gait deviation index (GDI). ASD were classified into three groups: 51 with sagittal malalignment (ASD-Sag: SVA > 50 mm, PT > 25°, and/or PI-LL > 10°), 28 with only frontal deformity (ASD-Front: Cobb > 20°) and 40 with only hyperkyphosis (ASD-HyperTK: TK > 60°). Kinematics were compared between groups. RESULTS: ASD-Sag had a decreased pelvic mobility compared to controls with a decreased ROM of hips (38 vs. 45°) and knees (51 vs. 61°). Furthermore, ASD-Sag exhibited a decreased walking speed (0.8 vs. 1.2 m/s) and GDI (80 vs. 95, all p < 0.05) making them more prone to falls. ASD-HyperTK showed similar patterns but in a less pronounced way. ASD-Front had normal walking patterns. GDI, knee flex/extension and walking speed were significantly associated with SVA and PT (r = 0.30-0.65). CONCLUSION: Sagittal spinal malalignment seems to be the driver of gait alterations in ASD. Patients with higher GT, SVA, PT or PI-LL tended to walk slower, with shorter steps in order to maintain stability with a limited flexibility in the pelvis, hips and knees. These changes were found to a lesser extent in ASD with only hyperkyphosis but not in those with only frontal deformity. 3D gait analysis is an objective tool to evaluate functionality in ASD patients depending on their type of spinal deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Long spine fusions to the sacrum-pelvis are associated with greater post-operative proximal junctional kyphosis angle in sitting position.

STUDY DESIGN: A single-centre retrospective study. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although adult patients spend most of their time in sitting positions, the assessment of spinopelvic parameters in adult deformity surgery is commonly performed in standing X-rays. Our study compares the standing and sitting sagittal alignment parameters in subjects who underwent thoracolumbar fusion. METHODS: Patients who underwent corrective surgery for adult scoliosis with at least five instrumented vertebra were stratified according to the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and pelvic fixation. Group A:UIV proximal to T6 with pelvis fixation. B:UIV lower than T6 and pelvic fixation. Group C: thoracolumbar fusion without pelvic fixation. Post-operative spinopelvic sagittal parameters were measured in both standing and sitting X-rays. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were enrolled in the study (11:Males and 40:Females). The mean age was 52.3 ± 21.7y/o. The comparison of post-operative standing and sitting X-ray within the group A and B showed that a significant change was observed in terms of JA-Junctional Angle-(Group A 6.3 ± 4.3 vs. 8.1 ± 3.3, p value = 0.03) (Group B 8.5 ± 6.4 vs. 10.9 ± 6.4, p value = 0.02). Group C showed statistically significant difference in terms of PT (15.6 ± 11.2 vs. 19.3 ± 9.2, p value = 0.04), AVA-Acetabular Version Angle-(41.1 ± 5.9 vs. 48.3 ± 6.6, p value < 0.01) and LL (- 51.3 ± 16.0 vs. - 42.6 ± 10.7, p value < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In our series, the post-operative sagittal alignment showed peculiar behaviours and adaptations in sitting position, depending on the length and the site of the instrumented area. If the pelvis is included, the JA tends to significantly increase in sitting position. These findings can improve the knowledge of pathologies as proximal junctional kyphosis or specific cases of anterior hip impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in patients with lumbar stenosis after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND: To explore the predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in the elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 82 LSS patients with sagittal malalignment (SVA ≥ 50 mm or PT ≥ 20° or PI-LL ≥ 20°) who underwent short-segment decompression and fusion surgery between January 2019 and March 2021. Patients' characteristic, radiographic and paravertebral muscle parameters were assessed. The patients were divided into group A (postoperative malalignment) and B (postoperative alignment) according to whether the postoperative restoration of the sagittal alignment was achieved. RESULTS: There existed more males in group B than in group A (p = 0.002). The age of group A (73.36 ± 8.02) was greater than that of group B (69.08 ± 6.07, p = 0.009). Preoperative PT in group A (27.40 ± 5.82) was greater than that in group B (19.30 ± 7.32, p < 0.001). The functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) in group A (28.73 ± 4.23) was lower than that in group B (36.94 ± 7.81, p < 0.001). And the fatty infiltration rate (FI) of group A (27.16% ± 5.58%) was higher than that of group B (22.61% ± 5.81%, p = 0.001). The fCSA was negatively correlated with the postoperative PT and PTr (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Stronger lumbar paravertebral muscles, smaller preoperative PI, PT or PI-LL, male and younger age are the predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in the elderly LSS patients after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery.

Static and dynamic sagittal lumbar apex: a new concept for the assessment of lumbar lordosis distribution in spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: Sagittal lumbar apex has been demonstrated to be a key parameter in sagittal plane morphology. Our aim was to understand its behavior with postural changes, analyzing two different concepts of lumbar apex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study with a cohort of patients presenting sagittal malalignment identified from a monocenter database of adult spinal deformities (ASD). Inclusion criteria were age > 30 years, SVA > 40 mm, and/or PT > 20. All patients had full-spine EOS radiographs in 2 different positions: (P1: natural position) and position 2 (P2: compensated position). Sagittal alignment, spinopelvic values, and two different methods of assessing lordosis apex location were analyzed in both P1 and P2 positions. Changes between P1 and P2 were compared using a paired t test with a significance level at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were recruited (21 women and 4 men). The mean age was 64.8 years (range 21-79). The patient's main compensation was based on an increase in the femoral shaft angle, and pelvic retroversion, with a subsequent decrease in sacral slope, and therefore of the lower lumbar arc. When the lumbar apex was calculated as the most anterior point touching the vertical line in a lateral radiograph, postural compensation changes modified its location usually shifting it to a more caudal position. When the lumbar apex was assessed as the most distant point of the global lumbar lordosis, its position remained stable regardless of compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Postural changes can modify the location of the lumbar apex when understanding its location as the cornerstone of sagittal plane harmonic distribution. This concept can be useful as an additional sign to assess compensation. However, if the lumbar apex was calculated as the angular point of the global lordosis, its position remained stable regardless of postural changes. This concept can help to mold lumbar lordosis in ASD surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) L5-S1 with overpowering of posterior lumbosacral instrumentation and fusion mass: a reliable solution in revision spine surgery.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In cases of spine surgical revisions of patients affected by sagittal malalignment, the restoration of the ideal lumbar lordosis (LL) is mandatory. ALIF procedures represent a powerful and effective approach to improve the LL in case of hypolordosis. This study evaluates the feasibility of ALIF to overpower posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion mass in revision spine surgery and secondarily to estimate complications, clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on the use of ALIF overpowering in cases of lumbosacral instrumentation and/or fusion. Demographic, comorbidity, corrective strategy adopted, surgical data, clinical and radiological results, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: Twelve patients (3 male; 9 female) underwent overpowering ALIF L5-S1 were included in the study with a mean FU of 34.0 ± 13.4 months. In 10 cases, a posterior titanium instrumentation and fusion mass were present; in 2 patients, only a fusion mass was present. Indicators of pain and disability improved in all patients (p < 0.01). Sagittal realignment with the restoration of ideal spinopelvic parameters was obtained in all cases. One peritoneal lesion requiring intraoperative suture without sequelae, two cases of postoperative radiculopathy, and one posterior wound infection requiring surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior implant of lordotic and hyperlordotic cages with increasing segmental lordosis is possible in the presence of posterior instrumentation and/or solid fusion mass. The biomechanical strength of this corrective technique can overcome posterior instrumentation and bone fusion resistance, therefore allowing a single-staged surgery for sagittal realignment.

The relationship of global sagittal malalignment to fatty infiltration in the aging spine.

PURPOSE: To investigate associations between muscle size, fat infiltration (FI), and global sagittal alignment in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted on a single-institution database of ASD patients with preoperative radiographs and CTs. Following multiplanar reconstructions of CTs, images in the plane of each vertebra were generated. The posterior vertebral musculature (PVM) was contoured on axial images at three vertebral levels (T2, T10, L3). FI was calculated by comparing Hounsfield units within muscles to the normative values of fat. Correlation analyses were conducted between demographics, alignment, and muscle characteristics. RESULTS: 107 patients underwent preoperative spine CT (58yo, 79%F, BMI 27 kg/m2). Muscle data were available for 49 pts at T2, 39 pts at T10, and 81 pts at L3. Mean FI was T2 = 33% ± 18, T10 = 28% ± 19, L3_Erector = 39% ± 19, and L3_Psoas = 19% ± 9. FI correlated across levels (T2 vs. T10 r = 0.698; T10 vs L3_Erector r = 0.506; L3_Erector vs Psoas r = 0.419) and with demographics; older pts had greater fat percentages (r = 0.31-0.45) and BMIs (r = 0.24-0.51). Increased FI at T2, T10, and L3 was associated with increased pelvic retroversion (PT: r = 0.25-0.43), global deformity (TPA: r = 0.27-0.45), and anterior malalignment (SVA: r = 0.23-0.41). The degree of FI in the PVM increased with the severity of SRS-Schwab PT and SVA modifiers. CONCLUSION: In ASD patients, global sagittal malalignment is related to FI of the PVM throughout the lumbar and thoracic spine, as identified through CT. Future research should investigate how FI relates to ASD pathogenesis.

Spino-femoral muscles affect sagittal alignment and compensatory recruitment: a new look into soft tissues in adult spinal deformity.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify muscle characteristics (volumes and fat infiltration) and identify their relationship to sagittal malalignment and compensatory mechanism recruitment. METHODS: Female adult spinal deformity patients underwent T1-weighted MRI with a 2-point Dixon protocol from the proximal tibia up to the T12 vertebra. 3D reconstructions of 17 muscles, including extensors and flexors of spine, hip and knee, were obtained. Muscle volume standardized by bone volume and percentage of fat infiltration (Pfat) were calculated. Correlations and regressions were performed. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were included. Significant correlations were observed between sagittal alignment and muscle parameters. Fat infiltration of the hip and knee flexors and extensors correlated with larger C7-S1 SVA. Smaller spinal flexor/extensor volumes correlated with greater PI-LL mismatch (r = - 0.45 and - 0.51). Linear regression identified volume of biceps femoris as only predictor for PT (R2 = 0.34, p = 0.005) and Pfat of gluteus minimus as only predictor for SVA (R2 = 0.45, p = 0.001). Sagittally malaligned patients with larger PT (26.8° vs. 17.2°) had significantly smaller volume and larger Pfat of gluteus medius, gluteus minimus and biceps femoris, but similar values for gluteus maximus, the hip extensor. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to quantify the relationship between degeneration of spino-femoral muscles and sagittal malalignment. This pathoanatomical study identifies the close relationship between gluteal, hamstring muscles and PT, SVA, which deepens our understanding of the underlying etiology that contributes to adult spinal deformity.

Different acute behaviors of pelvic incidence after long fusion to sacrum between elderly patients with severe and minor sagittal deformity: a retrospective radiographic study on 102 cases.

PURPOSE: To compare the acute behaviors of pelvic incidence (PI) between elderly adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with severe and minor sagittal deformity based on SRS-Schwab classification and to identify the mechanism of the variability in PI after long fusion to S1. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or above with available radiographs were included. The following parameters were measured pre- and postoperatively: Thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), PI-LL and T1 pelvic angle (TPA). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were found with severe sagittal deformity were assigned to Group S, and 60 patients with minor sagittal deformity were assigned to Group M. Immediately after surgery, lumbar curve, TLK and PI-LL were obviously corrected in both groups, while LL, PI, SVA and TPA were significantly increased in Group S alone. PI was significantly increased from 42.6 ± 4.7° to 51.7 ± 6.0° in Group S (P = 0.002), but changed from 45.4 ± 10.2° to 46.3 ± 10.3° in Group M without statistical significance. Pearson correlation analysis showed changes in PI was significantly correlated with changes in SVA (r = 0.415, P = 0.011) in patients with PI increased more than 5°. CONCLUSION: PI spontaneously increases in elderly ASD patients with severe sagittal deformity after long fusion to sacrum, while is relative invariable in those with minor sagittal deformity. Variation in PI could be considered as a secondary change compensating for the spinal sagittal malalignment under long spinal fusion in elderly patients.

Development of a validated computer-based preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis with 91% accuracy in 336 adult spinal deformity patients.

OBJECTIVEPseudarthrosis can occur following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery and can lead to instrumentation failure, recurrent pain, and ultimately revision surgery. In addition, it is one of the most expensive complications of ASD surgery. Risk factors contributing to pseudarthrosis in ASD have been described; however, a preoperative model predicting the development of pseudarthrosis does not exist. The goal of this study was to create a preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis based on demographic, radiographic, and surgical factors.METHODSA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, multicenter ASD database was conducted. Study inclusion criteria consisted of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with spinal deformity and surgery for the ASD. From among 82 variables assessed, 21 were used for model building after applying collinearity testing, redundancy, and univariable predictor importance ≥ 0.90. Variables included demographic data along with comorbidities, modifiable surgical variables, baseline coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters, and baseline scores for health-related quality of life measures. Patients groups were determined according to their Lenke radiographic fusion type at the 2-year follow-up: bilateral or unilateral fusion (union) or pseudarthrosis (nonunion). A decision tree was constructed, and internal validation was accomplished via bootstrapped training and testing data sets. Accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the model.RESULTSA total of 336 patients were included in the study (nonunion: 105, union: 231). The model was 91.3% accurate with an AUC of 0.94. From 82 initial variables, the top 21 covered a wide range of areas including preoperative alignment, comorbidities, patient demographics, and surgical use of graft material.CONCLUSIONSA model for predicting the development of pseudarthrosis at the 2-year follow-up was successfully created. This model is the first of its kind for complex predictive analytics in the development of pseudarthrosis for patients with ASD undergoing surgical correction and can aid in clinical decision-making for potential preventative strategies.

Revision of Harrington rod constructs: a single-center's experience with this homogenous adult spinal deformity population at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes following revision surgery after HRC fusions. METHODS: Single-institution, retrospective study of patients revised following HRC with minimum 2-year follow-up post-revision. Demographics, perioperative information, radiographic parameters, complications, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were collected. Radiographic parameters included global alignment, coronal and sagittal measurements pre and postoperatively, as well as final follow-up time points. RESULTS: 26 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 1.1 years. Mean age was 55.5 ± 7.8 years, BMI 25.2 ± 5.8, and 22 (85%) were females. Instrumented levels increased from 9.7 ± 2.8 to 16.0 ± 2.2. Five (19.2%) patients underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies, and 23 (88.4%) had interbody fusions. Patients significantly improved in all radiographic parameters at immediate and final follow-up (p < 0.005), except for thoracic kyphosis and pelvic incidence (p > 0.05). Correction was maintained from immediate postop to final follow-up (p > 0.05). 20 (76.9%) of patients experienced a complication at some point within the follow-up period with the most common being a lumbar nerve root deficit (n = 7). However, only one patient had a nerve root deficit at final follow-up, that being a 4/5 unilateral anterior tibialis function. 5 (19.2%) patients required further revision within a mean of 1.8 ± 1.1 years. On average, patients had an improvement in ODI score by final follow-up (35.6 ± 16.8 vs 25.4 ± 19.8, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Patients revised for HRCs significantly improve, both clinically and radiographically by final follow-up. This group did have a propensity for distal lumbar root neurological issues, which were common but all patients except for one, recovered to full strength by two-year follow-up.

Combined Anterior-Posterior vs. Posterior-Only Approach in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Which Strategy Is Superior?

Introduction: Whether a combined anterior-posterior (AP) approach offers additional benefits over the posterior-only (P) approach in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery remains unknown. In a cohort of patients undergoing ASD surgery, we compared the combined AP vs. the P-only approach in: (1) preoperative/perioperative variables, (2) radiographic measurements, and (3) postoperative outcomes. Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were ≥5-level fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and 2-year follow-up. The primary exposure was the operative approach: a combined AP approach or P alone. Postoperative outcomes included mechanical complications, reoperation, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID), defined as 30% of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Multivariable linear regression was controlled for age, BMI, and previous fusion. Results: Among 238 patients undergoing ASD surgery, 34 (14.3%) patients underwent the AP approach and 204 (85.7%) underwent the P-only approach. The AP group consisted mostly of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5/S1 (73.5%) and/or L4/L5 (38.0%). Preoperatively, the AP group had more previous fusions (64.7% vs. 28.9%, p < 0.001), higher pelvic tilt (PT) (29.6 ± 11.6° vs. 24.6 ± 11.4°, p = 0.037), higher T1 pelvic angle (T1PA) (31.8 ± 12.7° vs. 24.0 ± 13.9°, p = 0.003), less L1-S1 lordosis (-14.7 ± 28.4° vs. -24.3 ± 33.4°, p < 0.039), less L4-S1 lordosis (-25.4 ± 14.7° vs. 31.6 ± 15.5°, p = 0.042), and higher sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (102.6 ± 51.9 vs. 66.4 ± 71.2 mm, p = 0.005). Perioperatively, the AP approach had longer operative time (553.9 ± 177.4 vs. 397.4 ± 129.0 min, p < 0.001), more interbodies placed (100% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001), and longer length of stay (8.4 ± 10.7 vs. 7.0 ± 9.6 days, p = 0.026). Radiographically, the AP group had more improvement in T1PA (13.4 ± 8.7° vs. 9.5 ± 8.6°, p = 0.005), L1-S1 lordosis (-14.3 ± 25.6° vs. -3.2 ± 20.2°, p < 0.001), L4-S1 lordosis (-4.7 ± 16.4° vs. 3.2 ± 13.7°, p = 0.008), and SVA (65.3 ± 44.8 vs. 44.8 ± 47.7 mm, p = 0.007). These outcomes remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis controlling for age, BMI, and previous fusion. Postoperatively, no significant differences were found in mechanical complications, reoperations, or MCID of PROMs. Conclusions: Preoperatively, patients undergoing the combined anterior-posterior approach had higher PT, T1PA, and SVA and lower L1-S1 and L4-S1 lordosis than the posterior-only approach. Despite increased operative time and length of stay, the anterior-posterior approach provided greater sagittal correction without any difference in mechanical complications or PROMs.

Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy has been thoroughly described and studied over the past 2 decades, being applied mainly in the lumbar spine, followed by the thoracic spine. Our better understanding of alignment biomechanics, and the progressive refinements of the surgical technique over time made it a very efficient procedure for the management of fixed sagittal malalignment. However, a long learning curve is mandatory to mitigate the associated risks particularly neurological deficits and achieve satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes with an acceptable rate of complications.

The preservation of cervical flexibility helps maintain cervical sagittal alignment after laminoplasty.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical spine range of motion (ROM) is a critical factor in changes in cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and clinical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty (LMP). However, the impact of postoperative cervical ROM on CSA after cervical LMP is still unclear. PURPOSE: Evaluating the imaging and symptomatic data from patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to identify the influence of postoperative cervical ROM on post-LMP CSA and surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Eighty-six patients undergoing LMP due to multilevel CSM OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic parameters were measured before surgery and at follow-up: cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), CL in flexion (Flex CL), CL in extension (Ext CL), total cervical spine range of motion (ROM), cervical spine range of flexion (Flex ROM), and cervical spine range of extension (Ext ROM). Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and visual analog score (VAS) were used to assessed clinical outcomes. Other parameters included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), follow-up time, number of surgical segments, proximal level, distalis level, and collar wear time. METHODS: We divided patients according to the changes in CSA (loss of cervical lordosis (LCL)>10°, or ≤10°; an increase in cervical sagittal vertical axis (I-cSVA) >10mm, or ≤10mm). A receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was constructed to identify the optimal cut-off value to discriminate the patients with and without postoperative deterioration of CSA. RESULTS: The postoperative total and Flex ROM were significantly lower in the LCL>10° and I-cSVA>10mm groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that low post-Flex ROM was significant risk factor for postoperative deterioration of CSA. ROC showed that the cut-off value for postoperative Flex ROM was 15.60°. Improvements in JOA recovery rate and neck pain were more significant in the flexibility group (post-Flex ROM ≥15.6°) after surgery. Patients in the stiffness group (post-Flex ROM <15.6°) wore a collar longer. CONCLUSIONS: The preservation of cervical flexibility can maintain CSA after cervical LMP. Postoperative cervical stiffness is related to poor surgical outcomes because significant cervical kyphotic change and sagittal imbalance are likely to occur after surgery. Prolonged wearing of cervical collar is correlated with cervical stiffness following cervical LMP.

Kinematic adaptations from self-selected to fast speed walking in patients with adult spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: To investigate kinematic adaptations from self-selected to fast speed walking in ASD patients. METHODS: 115 primary ASD and 66 controls underwent biplanar radiographic X-rays and 3D gait analysis to calculate trunk, segmental spine and lower limb kinematics during self-selected and fast speed walking. Kinematic adaptation was calculated as the difference (Δ) between fast and self-selected speed walking. ASD with 7 or more limited kinematic adaptation parameters were classified as ASD-limited-KA, while those with less than 7 limited kinematic adaptation parameters were classified as ASD-mild-KA. RESULTS: 25 patients were classified as ASD-limited-KA and 90 as ASD-mild-KA. ASD-limited-KA patients walked with a lesser increase of pelvic rotation (Δ = 1.7 vs 5.5°), sagittal hip movement (Δ = 3.1 vs 7.4°) and shoulder-pelvis axial rotation (Δ = 3.4 vs 6.4°) compared to controls (all p < 0.05). ASD-limited-KA had an increased SVA (60.6 vs - 5.7 mm), PT (23.7 vs 11.9°), PI-LL (9.7 vs - 11.7°), knee flexion (9.2 vs - 0.4°) and a decreased LL (44.0 vs 61.4°) compared to controls (all p < 0.05). Kinematic and radiographic alterations were less pronounced in ASD-mild-KA. The limited increase of walking speed was correlated to the deteriorated physical component summary score of SF-36 (r = 0.37). DISCUSSION: Kinematic limitations during adaptation from self-selected to fast speed walking highlight an alteration of a daily life activity in ASD patients. ASD with limited kinematic adaptations showed more severe sagittal malalignment with an increased SVA, PT, PI-LL, and knee flexion, a decreased LL and the most deteriorated quality of life. This highlights the importance of 3D movement analysis in the evaluation of ASD.

Lumbar scoliosis and stenosis: What outcomes for which treatment? Analysis of three surgical techniques in 154 patients with minimum two-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicentric study. OBJECTIVE: This study goal was to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of lumbar stenosis and scoliosis (LSS) patients, treated with lumbar decompression (LD), short fusion and decompression (SF) or long fusion with deformity correction (LF). HYPOTHESIS: Procedures without correction lead to poorer long-term outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients with two-year minimum follow-up, older than 50, with lumbar scoliosis (Cobb angle>15°), and symptomatic lumbar stenosis were included. Age, gender, Lumbar and Radicular Visual Analog Scale, ODI, SF12 and SRS30 were collected. Main and adjacent curves Cobb angles, C7 coronal tilt (C7CT), spinopelvic parameters, and spino-sacral angle (SSA) were measured preoperatively, at one and two years. Patients were sorted into surgery type groups. RESULTS: In total, 154 patients were included, with respectively 18, 58 and 78 patients in LD, SF and LF groups. Mean age was 69, 85% were women. Clinical scores improved in each group at one year, but only LF group exhibited persistent improvement at 2years. A significant fractional Cobb angle increase was noted in the SF group at 2years (from 12±11° to 18±14°). C7CT significantly increased in the LD group at 2years (from 2.5±1.3° to 5.1±3.5°). LF group presented the highest complication rate (45%, 19% for SF and 0% for LD). The overall revision rate was 14% in SF group and 30% in LF group. CONCLUSION: LSS is a complex pathology requiring custom-made surgical treatment. LD, SF and LF allow satisfactory clinical outcome, with a better and more sustained clinical improvement for LF despite higher complication and revision rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Outcomes and reoperation rates of adult spinal deformity patients with baseline sagittal malalignment based on the cranial axis to the hip at 2 years postoperatively.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to discern whether patients with a cranial sagittal vertical axis to the hip (CrSVA-H) > 2 cm at 2 years postoperatively exhibit significantly worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical outcomes compared with patients with CrSVA-H < 2 cm. METHODS: This was a retrospective, 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) study of patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity. All patients had a baseline sagittal imbalance of CrSVA-H > 30 mm. Two-year patient-reported and clinical outcomes were assessed in unmatched and PSM cohorts, including Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) and Oswestry Disability Index scores as well as reoperation rates. The study compared two cohorts based on 2-year alignment: CrSVA-H < 20 mm (aligned cohort) vs CrSVA-H > 20 mm (malaligned cohort). For the matched cohorts, binary outcome comparisons were carried out using the McNemar test, while continuous outcomes used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For unmatched cohorts, categorical variables were compared using chi-square/Fisher's tests, while continuous outcomes were compared using Welch's t-test. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients with mean age of 63.7 (SEM 1.09) years underwent posterior spinal fusion spanning a mean of 13.5 (0.32) levels. At baseline, the mean pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch was 19.1° (2.01°), the T1 pelvic angle was 26.6° (1.20°), and the CrSVA-H was 74.9 (4.33) mm. The mean CrSVA-H improved from 74.9 mm to 29.2 mm (p < 0.0001). At the 2-year follow-up, 129 (78%) of 164 patients achieved CrSVA-H < 2 cm (aligned cohort). Patients who had CrSVA-H > 2 cm (malaligned cohort) at the 2-year follow-up had worse preoperative CrSVA-H (p < 0.0001). After performing PSM, 27 matched pairs were generated. In the PSM cohort, the aligned and malaligned cohorts demonstrated comparable preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, at the 2-year postoperative follow-up, the malaligned cohort reported worse outcomes in SRS-22r function (p = 0.0275), pain (p = 0.0012), and mean total score (p = 0.0109). Moreover, when patients were stratified based on their magnitude of improvement in CrSVA-H (< 50% vs > 50%), patients with > 50% improvement in CrSVA-H had superior outcomes in SRS-22r function (p = 0.0336), pain (p = 0.0446), and mean total score (p = 0.0416). Finally, patients in the malaligned cohort had a higher 2-year reoperation rate (22% vs 7%; p = 0.0412) compared with patients in the aligned cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who present with forward sagittal imbalance (CrSVA-H > 30 mm), patients with CrSVA-H exceeding 20 mm at the 2-year postoperative follow-up have inferior PROs and higher reoperation rates.

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Behavior of Pelvic Incidence After Different Posterior Spinal Procedures in Elderly Patients With Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the behavior of pelvic incidence (PI) after different posterior spinal procedures in elderly patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), to determine the potential associated factors with the variability in PI after spinal surgery and to comprehensively analyze its mechanisms. METHODS: Elderly patients underwent long fusion to sacrum with and without pelvic fixation were assigned to Group L+P and Group L-P, respectively. In Group L-P, those with severe sagittal deformity were selected as Group A. 20 elderly patients with severe sagittal deformity underwent short lumbar fusion were included as Group B. The following radiographic parameters were evaluated: thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and pelvic parameters. PI changing more than 5° (△PI > 5°) was considered as substantially changed. RESULTS: For the whole cohort and in Group L+P, PI were not substantially changed (△PI ≤ 5°) after surgery. Besides the severer sagittal malalignment in patients with △PI > 5° in Group L-P, relatively larger mean age, greater proportion of female and lower preoperative PI were found than those in patients with △PI ≤ 5°. 70.8% of patients had substantial increase of PI in Group A, while only 10% of patients had in Group B (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PI behaves differently under different conditions in elderly ASD patients. Besides severe sagittal deformity, aging, female and low preoperative PI are also the potential risk factors of PI increasing after long fusion to sacrum.