Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics Approaches for Preoperative Prediction of EGFR Mutation Status in Spinal Bone Metastases in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative prediction of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM) from primary lung adenocarcinoma is potentially important for treatment decisions. PURPOSE: To develop and validate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics methods for preoperative prediction of EGFR mutation based on MRI of SBM. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: A total of 97 preoperative patients with lumbar SBM from lung adenocarcinoma (77 in training set and 20 in validation set). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin echo sequences at 3.0 T. ASSESSMENT: Radiomics handcrafted and deep learning-based features were extracted and selected from each MRI sequence. The abilities of the features to predict EGFR mutation status were analyzed and compared. A radiomics nomogram was constructed integrating the selected features. STATISTICAL TESTS: The Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 test were employed for evaluating associations between clinical characteristics and EGFR mutation status for continuous and discrete variables, respectively. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used for selection of predictive features. Sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the ability of radiomics models to predict the EGFR mutation. Calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to assess and validate nomogram results. RESULTS: The radiomics signature comprised five handcrafted and one deep learning-based features and achieved good performance for predicting EGFR mutation status, with AUCs of 0.891 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.820-0.962, SEN = 0.913, SPE = 0.710) in the training group and 0.771 (95% CI, 0.551-0.991, SEN = 0.750, SPE = 0.875) in the validation group. DCA confirmed the potential clinical usefulness of the radiomics models. DATA CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics is potentially clinical valuable for predicting EGFR mutation status in patients with SBM from lung adenocarcinoma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 2.

Radiation-induced acute toxicities after image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for patients with spinal metastases (IRON-1 trial) : First results of a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) provides an important treatment approach in the palliative care of vertebral metastases, but radiation-induced toxicities in patients with advanced disease and low performance status can have substantial implications for quality of life. Herein, we prospectively compared toxicity profiles of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs. conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). METHODS: This was a prospective randomized monocentric explorative pilot trial to compare radiation-induced toxicity between IMRT and 3DCRT for patients with spinal metastases. A total of 60 patients were randomized between November 2016 and May 2017. In both cohorts, RT was delivered in 10 fractions of 3 Gy each. The primary endpoint was radiation-induced toxicity at 3 months. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 4.3 months. Two patients suffered from grade 3 acute toxicities in the IMRT arm, along with 1 patient in the 3DCRT group. At 12 weeks after treatment (t2), 1 patient reported grade 3 toxicity in the IMRT arm vs. 4 patients in the 3DCRT group. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred in either group. In the IMRT arm, the most common side effects by the end of irradiation (t1) were grade 1-2 xerostomia and nausea in 8 patients each (29.6%), and dyspnea in 7 patients (25.9%). In the 3DCRT group, the most frequent adverse events (t1) were similar: grade 1-2 xerostomia (n = 10, 35.7%), esophagitis (n = 10, 35.8%), nausea (n = 10, 35.8%), and dyspnea (n = 5, 17.9%). CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized trial to evaluate radiation-induced toxicities after IMRT versus 3DCRT in patients with vertebral metastases. This trial demonstrated an additional improvement for IMRT in terms of acute side effects, although longer follow-up is required to further ascertain other endpoints.

A systematic review of prognostic factors predicting survival in patients with spinal bone metastases.

PURPOSE: For the selection of treatment in patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM), survival estimation plays a crucial role to avoid over- and under-treatment. To aid clinicians in this difficult task, several prediction models have been developed, consisting of many different risk factors. The aim of this systematic review was to identify prognostic factors that are associated with survival in patients with SBM to support development of predictive models. METHODS: A systematic review was performed with focus on prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with SBM. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and assessed the risk of bias. A level of evidence synthesis was performed for each prognostic factor. Inter-observer agreement for the risk of bias assessment was determined by the kappa-statistic. RESULTS: After screening, 142 full-text articles were obtained, of which 22 met the eligibility criteria. A total of 43 different prognostic factors were investigated in the included studies, of which 17 were relevant to pre-treatment survival estimation. The prognostic factors most frequently associated with survival were the primary tumor and the performance status. The prognostic factors most frequently not associated with survival were age, gender, number and location of the SBM and the presence of a pathologic fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostication for patients with SBM should be based on an accurate primary tumor classification, combined with a performance score. The benefit of adding other prognostic factors is doubtful.

Survival and prognostic factors in patients with stable and unstable spinal bone metastases from solid tumors: a retrospective analysis of 915 cases.

BACKGROUND: Adequate prediction of survival plays an important role in treatment decisions for patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM). Several prognostic factors are already used in daily clinical practice, but factors related to stability of SBM are still unknown. Therefore, we designed this study to identify these prognostic factors. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 915 patients from solid tumors with commonly metastased into the bone treated at our department between January 2000 and January 2012. Lung cancer (NSCLC), breast and renal cancer listed in Table 1 are the most common solid tumors with bone metastasis in this study. Prostate carcinoma was excluded due to osteoblastic SBM with no influence for stability. We calculated overall survival (OS) and bone survival (BS; time between first diagnosis of bone metastases until death) with the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed prognostic factors for BS with the log-rank test and a Cox regression model separately for patients with stable and unstable SBM. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 9.3 months. OS after 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years was 81, 62, 42, and 25 % in patients with stable SBM and 78, 57, 38, and 22 % in patients with unstable SBM (p = 0.851). BS was 57, 38, 22, and 5 % in the group of stable SBM after 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years. For patients with unstable SBM BS after 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years was 59, 39, 19, and 8 % (p = 0.755). In multivariate analysis we found male gender (HR = 1.27 [95 % CI 1.01-1.60], p = 0.04), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80 % (HR = 1.27 [95%CI 1.04-1.55], p = 0.02) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; HR = 2.77 [95%CI 1.99-3.86], p < 0.0001) to be independent prognostic factors for shortened survival in patients with stable SBM. Independent prognostic factors for unstable SBM were age per year (HR = 1.01 [95 % CI 1.0-1.02], p = 0.025), multiple SBM (HR = 1.35 [95 % CI 1.1-1.65], p = 0.003), and NSCLC (HR = 2.0 [95 % CI 1.43-2.80], p < 0.0001). Additionally, not wearing an orthopedic corset (HR = 0.77 [95 % CI 0.62-0.96], p = 0.02) was associated with prolonged BS in patients with unstable SBM and in both groups BS was significantly longer in patients without liver metastases (stable SBM: HR = 0.72 [95 % CI 0.56-0.92], p = 0.008; unstable SBM: HR = 0.71 [95 % CI 0.54-0.92], p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Survival was equal for patients with stable and unstable SBM. However, prognostic factors differed in both groups and stability should therefore be considered in treatment decision-making.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful spinal metastases: a decade of experience at a single institution.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pain relief in patients with painful spinal bone metastases (SBMs) and to identify key factors contributing to treatment outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent SBRT for painful solid tumor SBMs between March 2012 and January 2023. During this period, SBRT was performed adhering to the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations for target volume delineation. To be included, patients needed to experience persistent pain directly associated with SBMs, warranting regular opioid treatment. Positive pain relief post-SBRT was defined by three criteria: 1) a decrease in the severity of pain; 2) reduction in opioid dosage; and 3) concurrent improvement in daily activities. The revised Tokuhashi score and Spine Instability Neoplastic Score were used to identify crucial factors influencing treatment outcomes. RESULTS: This study included 377 patients, covering 576 lesions across 759 vertebrae. Of these, 332 lesions showed significant pain relief within 3 months following SBRT. Lower pain relief rates were observed in patients with a revised Tokuhashi score of 0-8 or in patients with diabetes mellitus. In contrast, higher relief rates were linked to treating a single painful SBM in 1 SBRT course, and greater contouring of the involved sectors according to International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations. The highest pain relief rate was observed in patients with prostate cancer (73.8%), whereas the lowest rate was observed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (36.4%). The presence of pre-SBRT vertebral fractures, the dosage and fraction of SBRT, and the use of concurrent systemic cancer therapies or antiresorptive agents, including bisphosphonates and denosumab, did not notably influence the pain relief efficacy of SBRT. Comprehensive medical records 6 months after SBRT treatment were available for only 362 lesions. The overall rate of pain relief observed was 32.6%. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is an effective treatment approach for managing painful SBMs, achieving a pain relief rate of 57.6% within 3 months and maintaining a rate of 32.6% at 6 months after treatment. The transition to osteoblastic lesions may potentially improve the stability of SBMs, indicated by lower Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, which in turn could extend pain relief management.

PSMA-PET/CT-Based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Non-Spinal Bone Oligometastases from Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has a consolidated role in the treatment of bone oligometastases from prostate cancer (PCa). While the evidence for spinal oligometastases SBRT was robust, its role in non-spinal-bone metastases (NSBM) is not standardized. In fact, there was no clear consensus about dose and target definition in this setting. The aim of our study was to evaluate efficacy, toxicity, and the pattern of relapse in SBRT delivered to NSBM from PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2021, we treated a series of oligo-NSBM from PCa with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-guided SBRT. The primary endpoint was local progression-free survival (LPFS). The secondary endpoints were toxicity, the pattern of intraosseous relapse, distant progression-free survival (DPFS), polimetastases-free survival (PMFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: a total of 150 NSBM in 95 patients were treated with 30-35 Gy in five fractions. With a median follow-up of 26 months, 1- and 3 years LPFS was 96.3% and 89%, respectively. A biologically effective dose (BED) ≥ 198 Gy was correlated with improved LPFS (p = 0.007). Intraosseous relapse occurred in eight (5.3%) cases. Oligorecurrent disease was associated with a better PMFS compared to de novo oligometastatic disease (p = 0.001) and oligoprogressive patients (p = 0.007). No grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred. CONCLUSION: SBRT is a safe and effective tool for NSBM from PCa in the oligometastatic setting. Intraosseous relapse was a relatively rare event. Predictive factors of the improved outcomes were defined.

Does re-ossification after palliative radiotherapy for spinal bone metastases help maintain vertebral body height?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: After palliative radiotherapy of spinal bone metastases, re-ossification is sometimes observed in bone with osteolytic changes. However, it remains unknown whether the re-ossification that is observed after radiotherapy is associated with preservation of vertebral body height. PURPOSE: To investigate whether re-ossification observed after palliative radiotherapy can contribute to the preservation of vertebral body height. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study. PATIENTS SAMPLE: We investigated 111 vertebral bodies in 54 patients that underwent palliative radiotherapy at a single center for painful osteolytic/mixed metastatic spinal tumors in solid tumors between 2016 and 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were the presence of re-ossification and vertebral body height reduction on the CT image. METHODS: Re-ossification was evaluated according to the MD Anderson response classification criteria, and sagittal CT images were used to evaluate vertebral body height. A vertebral body ID was assigned to the irradiated vertebral body, and continuous CT images obtained for each vertebral body ID were evaluated. The median number of evaluation periods for each vertebral body was 4, and the total number of periods was 463. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate factors related to the occurrence of vertebral body height reduction before the subsequent CT. As a subanalysis, factors related to re-ossification were investigated. RESULTS: The following primary cancer types were observed: lung cancer, 41 vertebral bodies; breast cancer, 19; renal cell cancer, 15; other, 36. A total of 62.2% showed re-ossification. The median time to confirmation of re-ossification by CT was 2 months. Factors significantly associated with vertebral body height reduction were presence of vertebral body height reduction before radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-63, p=.01) and no re-ossification (OR 137, 95% CI 22-3469, p<.01). Factors associated with re-ossification were the type of cancer and total radiation dose. Those with lung cancer and those with a total radiation dose of 20 Gy or less were more prone to re-ossification. CONCLUSIONS: Re-ossification was observed in 62.2% of vertebral bodies after palliative radiotherapy for painful osteolytic/mixed metastatic spinal tumors. The re-ossification group demonstrated significantly less vertebral body height reduction when compared with the non-re-ossification group. The presence of re-ossification may potentially serve an important role in maintaining vertebral body height.

Radiomics biopsy signature for predicting survival in patients with spinal bone metastases (SBMs).

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a registered cohort of patients treated and irradiated for metastases in the spinal column in a single institute. OBJECTIVE: This is the first study to develop and internally validate radiomics features for predicting six-month survival probability for patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM). BACKGROUND DATA: Extracted radiomics features from routine clinical CT images can be used to identify textural and intensity-based features unperceivable to human observers and associate them with a patient survival probability or disease progression. METHODS: A study was conducted on 250 patients treated for metastases in the spinal column irradiated for the first time between 2014 and 2016, at the MAASTRO clinic in Maastricht, the Netherlands. The first 150 available patients were used to develop the model and the subsequent 100 patient were considered as a test set for the model. A bootstrap (B = 400) stepwise model selection, which combines both the forward and backward variable elimination procedure, was used to select the most useful predictive features from the training data based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The stepwise selection procedure was applied to the 400 bootstrap samples, and the results were plotted as a histogram to visualize how often each variable was selected. Only variables selected more than 90 % of the time over the bootstrap runs were used to build the final model.A prognostic index (PI) called radiomics score (radscore) and clinical score (clinscore) was calculated for each patient. The prognostic index was not scaled, the original values were used which can be extracted from the model directly or calculated as a linear combination of the variables in the model multiplied by the respective beta value for each patient. RESULTS: The clinical model had a good discrimination power. The radiomics model, on the other hand, had an inferior performance with no added predictive power to the clinical model. The internal imaging characteristics do not seem to have a value in the prediction of survival. However, the Shape features were excluded from further analyses in our study since all biopsies had a standard shape hence no variability.

Association between Overall Survival and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Spinal Bone Metastases.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between overall survival (OS) and activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with skeletal-related events. In this study, 265 patients whose clinical parameters were available before radiotherapy were investigated. Methods: Age, sex, ADL, pain, the primary site, spinal level of bone metastases, spinal instability, treatment strategy, including chemotherapy or palliative treatment, and OS were investigated. ADL patients with a Barthel index of ≥90 were classified as the high ADL group, while those with a score < 90 were classified as the low ADL group. For OS, patients surviving ≥160 days were classified as the non-poor prognosis group, and those who survived <160 days were classified as the poor prognosis group. Results: Age, sex, ADL, pain, the primary site, and treatment strategy for OS were different between the two groups (p < 0.1). Logistic regression analysis revealed that ADL, the primary site, and treatment strategy were significant predictors of OS (p < 0.05). High ADL, breast cancer, and chemotherapy had a positive effect on OS. Conclusions: It is suggested that improvements may be obtained by performing rehabilitation interventions to maintain and improve ADL, by constructing a system for monitoring spinal bone metastases with images before ADL decreases, and by performing interventions such as changes in treatment methods such as RT or surgery at appropriate times.

SEOR SBRT-SG stereotactic body radiation therapy consensus guidelines for non-spine bone metastasis.

The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to treat non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. The clinical advantages of SBRT include good pain control and high local control rates, although only limited data are available. The Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) SBRT group recently convened a task force of experts in the field to address key questions related to SBRT for NSBM, including treatment indications, planning, techniques, and dose fractionation. The task force reviewed the available literature to develop evidence-based recommendations for the safe application of NSBM SBRT and to standardize and optimize SBRT processes. The present document provides a comprehensive analysis of the available data, including ongoing clinical trials and controversies, providing clinically applicable recommendations.

Comparative Analyses of Two Established Scores to Assess the Stability of Spinal Bone Metastases Before and After Palliative Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare two validated spinal instability scores regarding the stabilizing effects and skeletal-related events (SREs) of palliative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred eighty-two osteolytic SBM of lung or breast cancer patients were analyzed for stability before and following RT based on the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) or the Taneichi score. Score concordance was quantified by absolute agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient. SREs were defined as fractures or local progression after RT. OS was quantified as the time between the start of RT and death from any cause. RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months after RT, 35 and 50% of initially unstable SBM were re-stabilized according to SINS in patients still alive. Corresponding Taneichi score-based stabilization proportions were 25 and 46%, respectively. Comparison of both stability scores showed high absolute agreement for all time-points (range 71-78%, kappa range 0.35-0.44). SRE occurred more frequently in initially unstable SBM compared to stable SBM according to SINS (14 vs. 5%), but no such association could be shown for the Taneichi-based instability criterion. Poor general condition of patients was negatively associated with SINS-measured re-stabilization after 6 months, but no predictive factor for re-stabilization could be found for the Taneichi score. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively high agreement between both stabilization scores, the SINS should be considered the standard for future studies on the stabilization effects of RT in SBM.

Factors Affecting the Quality of Life of Patients with Painful Spinal Bone Metastases.

This study examined changes in the quality of life (QOL), as well as the factors affecting QOL, among patients with painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis for 1 month after radiotherapy. METHODS: This study included 79 participants (40 male and 39 female; median age, 65 (42-88) years) who had undergone radiotherapy for painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis. Patients' age, sex, activities of daily living (Barthel index), pain, spinal instability (spinal instability neoplastic score [SINS]), and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) were investigated. RESULTS: Having an unstable SINS score was a positive factor for global health status (p < 0.05). The improvement in activities of daily living and response to pain were positive factors for physical function (p < 0.05). A positive effect on emotional function was confirmed among female patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Engaging in rehabilitation along with radiotherapy leads to improvements in QOL for patients with spinal bone metastases.

The Role of Palliative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Spinal Bone Metastases from Head and Neck Tumors-A Multicenter Analysis of a Rare Event.

This retrospective multi-center analysis aimed to assess the clinical response and stabilizing effects of palliative radiotherapy (RT) for spinal bone metastases (SBM) in head and neck cancer (HNC), and to establish potential predictive factors for stability and overall survival (OS). Patients included in this analysis were treated at the University Hospitals of Mainz, Freiburg, and Heidelberg between 2001 and 2019. Clinical information was taken from the medical records. The stability of affected vertebral bodies was assessed according to the validated spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) based on CT-imaging before RT, as well as 3 and 6 months after RT. OS was quantified as the time between the start of palliative RT and death from any cause or last follow-up. Potential predictive factors for stability and OS were analyzed using generalized estimating equations and Cox regression for time-varying covariates to take into account multiple observations per patient. The mean follow-up time of 66 included patients after the first palliative RT was 8.1 months (range 0.3-85.0 months). The majority of patients (70%; n = 46) had squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) originating from the pharynx, larynx and oral cavity, while most of the remaining patients (26%; n = 17) suffered from salivary glands tumors. A total of 95 target volumes including 178 SBM were evaluated that received a total of 81 irradiation series. In patients with more than one metastasis per irradiated region, only the most critical bone metastasis was analyzed according to the SINS system. Prior to RT, pain and neurologic deficits were present in 76% (n = 72) and 22% (n = 21) of irradiated lesions, respectively, and 68% of the irradiated lesions (n = 65) were assessed as unstable or potentially unstable prior to RT. SBM-related pain symptoms and neurologic deficits responded to RT in 63% and 47% of the treated lesions, respectively. Among patients still alive at 3 and 6 months after RT with potentially unstable or unstable SBM, a shift to a better stability class according to the SINS was observed in 20% and 33% of the irradiated SBM, respectively. Pathological fractures of SBM were frequently detected before the start of irradiation (43%; n = 41), but after RT, new fractures or increasing vertebral body sintering within the irradiated region occurred rarely (8%; n = 8). A pathological fracture before RT was negatively associated with stabilization 6 months after RT (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02-0.49, p = 0.004), while a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) ≥ 70% was associated positively with a stabilization effect through irradiation (OR 6.09, 95% CI 1.68-22.05, p = 0.006). Mean OS following first palliative RT was 10.7 months, and the KPS (≥70% vs. <70%) was shown to be a strong predictive factor for OS after RT (HR 0.197, 95% CI 0.11-0.35, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in OS between patients with SCC and non-SCC. Palliative RT in symptomatic SBM of HNC provides sufficient symptom relief in the majority of patients, while only about one third of initially unstable SBM show re-stabilization after RT. Since patients in our multi-center cohort exhibited very limited OS, fractionation schemes should be determined depending on the patients' performance status.

Radiation-induced toxicity after image-guided and intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy for patients with spinal bone metastases (IRON-1): a study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) of bone metastases provides an important treatment approach in palliative care treatment concepts. As a consequence of treatment, the extent of radiation-induced toxicity is a crucial feature with consequences to a patient's quality of life. In this context this study aims at reducing the extent of radiation-induced side effects and toxicity by assuming a better sparing of normal tissue with the use of intensity-modulated instead of conventionally delivered external beam radiotherapy. METHODS/DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized, single-center trial for patients with spinal bone metastases, RT is performed as either image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (10x3Gy) or conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy (10x3Gy). Afterwards radiation-induced toxicity will be assessed and compared 3 and 6 months after the end of radiation. DISCUSSION: The aim of this pilot study is the evaluation of achievable benefits, with reduced radiation toxicity being the primary endpoint in the comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for patients with spinal bone metastases. Secondarily, bone re-calcification, quality of life, pain relief, spinal instability, and local control will be measured and compared between the two treatment groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02832830 . Registered on 12 July 2016.