Tumor hypoxia and radiotherapy: A major driver of resistance even for novel radiotherapy modalities.

Hypoxia in solid tumors is an important predictor of poor clinical outcome to radiotherapy. Both physicochemical and biological processes contribute to a reduced sensitivity of hypoxic tumor cells to ionizing radiation and hypoxia-related treatment resistances. A conventional low-dose fractionated radiotherapy regimen exploits iterative reoxygenation in between the individual fractions, nevertheless tumor hypoxia still remains a major hurdle for successful treatment outcome. The technological advances achieved in image guidance and highly conformal dose delivery make it nowadays possible to prescribe larger doses to the tumor as part of single high-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy, while keeping an acceptable level of normal tissue complication in the co-irradiated organs at risk. However, we insufficiently understand the impact of tumor hypoxia to single high-doses of RT and hypofractionated RT. So-called FLASH radiotherapy, which delivers ionizing radiation at ultrahigh dose rates (> 40 Gy/sec), has recently emerged as an important breakthrough in the radiotherapy field to reduce normal tissue toxicity compared to irradiation at conventional dose rates (few Gy/min). Not surprisingly, oxygen consumption and tumor hypoxia also seem to play an intriguing role for FLASH radiotherapy. Here we will discuss the role of tumor hypoxia for radiotherapy in general and in the context of novel radiotherapy treatment approaches.

Five-year outcomes of fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer from the TRANSFORM phase II trial.

Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa), including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), has shown promise but is still considered investigational. This is the 5-year analysis of the TRANSFORM trial, the largest prospective cohort of men with oligometastatic PCa treated with SBRT-based MDT. The primary endpoint was 5-year treatment escalation-free survival (TE-FS), defined as freedom from any new cancer therapy other than further SBRT. In total, 199 men received SBRT; 76.4% were hormone-naïve at baseline. The rate of 5-year TE-FS was 21.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.7%-28.7%) overall and 25.4% (95% CI: 18.1%-33.9%) in the hormone-naïve subgroup. The subgroups with International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups 4-5 disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.05-2.01, p = .026), a higher baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.09, p < .001) and those who received prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.40-3.26, p < .001), were at greater risk of treatment escalation. Outcomes for participants with four or five initial lesions were comparable to those with one to three lesions. At last follow-up, 18.9% (95% CI: 13.2%-25.7%) of participants were free from treatment escalation (median follow-up of 67.9 months) and two participants had an undetectable PSA level. No treatment-related grade three or higher adverse events were reported. The findings of this study demonstrate that SBRT-based MDT is an effective option for delaying systemic treatment escalation in the context of oligometastatic PCa. Future randomised trials comparing SBRT-based MDT to standard-of-care ADT-based approaches are required to evaluate the impact of delaying ADT on survival.

Dose-intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful vertebral metastases: A randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomised study was to determine whether dose-intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for painful vertebral metastases results in increased rates of pain improvement compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) (control) 6 months after treatment. METHODS: This randomized, controlled phase 3 trial was conducted between November 2016 and January 2023, when it was stopped early. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older; had one or two painful, stable, or potentially unstable vertebral metastases; and had a life expectancy of 1 year or longer according to the investigator's estimates. Patients received 48.5 grays (Gy) in 10 fractions (with epidural involvement) or 40 Gy in five fractions (without epidural involvement) in the SBRT group and 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in five fractions in the cEBRT group, respectively. The primary end point was an improvement in the pain score at the treated site by at least 2 points (on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 points) at 6-month follow-up. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat and per-protocol basis. RESULTS: Of 214 patients who were screened for eligibility, 63 were randomized 1:1 between SBRT (33 patients with 36 metastases) and cEBRT (30 patients with 31 metastases). The median age of all patients was 66 years, and 40 patients were men (63.5%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the 6-month proportion of patients who had metastases with pain reduction by 2 or more points was significantly higher in the SBRT group versus the control group (69.4% vs. 41.9%, respectively; two-sided p = .02). Changes in opioid medication intake relative to baseline were nonsignificant between the groups. No differences were observed in vertebral compression fracture or adverse event rates between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-intensified SBRT improved pain score more effectively than cEBRT at 6 months.

Dose prescription for stereotactic body radiotherapy: general and organ-specific consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery.

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE: To develop expert consensus statements on multiparametric dose prescriptions for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) aligning with ICRU report 91. These statements serve as a foundational step towards harmonizing current SBRT practices and refining dose prescription and documentation requirements for clinical trial designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the results of a literature review by the working group, a two-tier Delphi consensus process was conducted among 24 physicians and physics experts from three European countries. The degree of consensus was predefined for overarching (OA) and organ-specific (OS) statements (≥ 80%, 60-79%, < 60% for high, intermediate, and poor consensus, respectively). Post-first round statements were refined in a live discussion for the second round of the Delphi process. RESULTS: Experts consented on a total of 14 OA and 17 OS statements regarding SBRT of primary and secondary lung, liver, pancreatic, adrenal, and kidney tumors regarding dose prescription, target coverage, and organ at risk dose limitations. Degree of consent was ≥ 80% in 79% and 41% of OA and OS statements, respectively, with higher consensus for lung compared to the upper abdomen. In round 2, the degree of consent was ≥ 80 to 100% for OA and 88% in OS statements. No consensus was reached for dose escalation to liver metastases after chemotherapy (47%) or single-fraction SBRT for kidney primaries (13%). In round 2, no statement had 60-79% consensus. CONCLUSION: In 29 of 31 statements a high consensus was achieved after a two-tier Delphi process and one statement (kidney) was clearly refused. The Delphi process was able to achieve a high degree of consensus for SBRT dose prescription. In summary, clear recommendations for both OA and OS could be defined. This contributes significantly to harmonization of SBRT practice and facilitates dose prescription and reporting in clinical trials investigating SBRT.

Patient vulnerability in stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR): a preliminary ethical appraisal from the STOPSTORM.eu consortium.

This preliminary ethical appraisal from the STOPSTORM.eu consortium is meant to raise critical points that clinicians administering stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation should consider to meet the highest standards in medical ethics and thus promote quality of life of patients recruited for radiotherapy treatments at a stage in which they experience a significant degree of vulnerability.

Utility of molecular markers in predicting local control specific to lung cancer spine metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We report outcomes following spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the significance of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and timing of immune check point inhibitors (ICI) on local failure (LF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 165 patients and 389 spinal segments were retrospectively reviewed from 2009 to 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes were abstracted. Primary endpoint was LF and secondary, overall survival (OS) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF). Multivariable analysis (MVA) evaluated factors predictive of LF and VCF. RESULTS: The median follow-up and OS were: 13.0 months (range, 0.5-95.3 months) and 18.4 months (95% CI 11.4-24.6). 52.1% were male and 76.4% had adenocarcinoma. Of the 389 segments, 30.3% harboured an EGFR mutation and 17.0% were PD-L1 ≥ 50%. The 24 months LF rate in PD-L1 ≥ 50% vs PD-L1 < 50% was 10.7% vs. 38.0%, and in EGFR-positive vs. negative was 18.1% vs. 30.0%. On MVA, PD-L1 status of ≥ 50% (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.69, p = 0.004) significantly predicted for lower LF compared to PD-L1 < 50%. Lower LF trend was seen with ICI administration peri and post SBRT (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16-1.05, p = 0.062). On MVA, polymetastatic disease (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.84-5.85, p < 0.0001) and ECOG ≥ 2 (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.16-3.02, p = 0.011) significantly predicted for worse OS and absence of baseline VCF predicted for lower VCF rate (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.10-0.39, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We report a significant association of PD-L1 ≥ 50% status on improved LC rates from spine SBRT in NSCLC patients.

A review of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an uncommon malignancy whose incidence has been increasing over the past few decades, posing treatment challenges for elderly or infirm patients who are not surgical candidates. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as a promising non-invasive treatment modality for RCC. The high dose-per-fraction used in SABR overcomes some of the mechanisms of radioresistance that has hindered the effective treatment of RCC with conventional radiotherapy. For primary RCC, local control rates for SABR exceed 90%, with typically minimal grade 3 or higher toxicities, offering a viable alternative for inoperable patients and those not eligible for or unable to tolerate radiofrequency or cryotherapy ablation. SABR can also be used in patients with a solitary kidney as a strategy for renal preservation to avoid need for dialysis. Given its excellent local control rates, low toxicity and preservation of renal function, SABR offers an attractive alternative to more invasive modalities for treatment of localized RCC.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: is less fractionation more effective in adrenal and renal malignant lesions?

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become an excellent non-invasive alternative for many patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and adrenal malignancies (AM). The aims of this study were to analyse how tumor-, patient- and treatment-related factors may influence the outcomes and side effects of SBRT and to assess its benefits as an alternative to surgery. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included 25 lesions in 23 patients treated with SBRT using different devices (LINAC, CyberKnife® and Tomotherapy®). A multivariate linear regression was used for the statistical study. RESULTS: Local control time was higher than six months in more than 87% of patients and treatment response was complete for 73.68%. There was an overall 2-year survival of 40% and none of the deaths were secondary to renal or adrenal local progression. Patients treated with lower total radiation dose (mean [m] = 55 Gy) but less fractions with more dose per fraction (> 8.5 Gy) showed better outcome. Patients with previous chemotherapy and surgery treatments also showed higher complete response and disease-free survival (> 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of ultra-hypofractionated regimens with higher doses per session. Thus, the referral of patients with RCC and AM to Radiotherapy and Oncology departments should be encouraged supporting the role of SBRT as a minimally invasive and outpatient treatment.

Navigating Breast Cancer Oligometastasis and Oligoprogression: Current Landscape and Future Directions.

PURPOSE: We examine the potential for curative approaches among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients by exploring the recent literature on local ablative therapies like surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer. We also cover therapies for MBC patients with oligoprogressive (OP) disease. KEY FINDINGS: Surgery and SBRT have been studied for OM and OP breast cancer, mainly in retrospective or non-randomized trials. While many studies demonstrated favorable results, a cooperative study and single-institution trial found no support for surgery/SBRT in OM and OP cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: While there is interest in applying local therapies to OM and OP breast cancer, the current randomized data does not back the routine use of surgery or SBRT, particularly when considering the potential for treatment-related toxicities. Future research should refine patient selection through advanced imaging and possibly explore these therapies specifically in patients with hormone receptor-positive or HER2-positive disease.

Radiation and Melanoma: Where Are We Now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current role of radiotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma in the definitive, adjuvant, and palliative settings, and combinations with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Definitive radiotherapy may be considered for lentigo maligna if surgery would be disfiguring. High risk, resected melanoma may be treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, but the role is poorly defined since the advent of effective systemic therapies. For patients with metastatic disease, immunotherapy and targeted therapies can be delivered safely in tandem with radiotherapy to improve outcomes. Radiotherapy and modern systemic therapies act in concert to improve outcomes, especially in the metastatic setting. Further prospective data is needed to guide the use of definitive radiotherapy for lentigo maligna and adjuvant radiotherapy for high-risk melanoma in the immunotherapy era. Current evidence does not support an abscopal response or at least identify the conditions necessary to reliably produce one with combinations of radiation and immunotherapy.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for distant metastases to the head and neck.

PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic disease to the head and neck (HN) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated with SBRT to HN sites from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Treatment indications included the following: oligometastases, oligoprogression, and control a dominant area of progression (DAP). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control (LC), regional control (RC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed. Grade 3-4 acute and late toxicities were reported by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (58 lesions) were analysed with a median follow-up of 16 months. Primary sites included lung (25.0%), kidney (19.6%), breast (19.6%) and other (35.8%). SBRT indications were as follows: oligometastases (42.9%), oligoprogression (19.6%) and local control of a dominant area of progression (37.5%). Most patients received SBRT to a single neck node (n = 47, 81.0%). Median SBRT dose was 40 Gy (range 25-50 Gy) in five fractions, with a median biologically effective dose (BED10) of 72 Gy (range 37.5-100 Gy). One- and 2-year LC and RC rates were 97.6% and 72.7% as well as 100% and 86.7%, respectively. Median OS was 19.2 months (95% [CI] 14.8-69.4), and median PFS was 7.4 months (95% [CI] 5.2-11.9). The 1-year OS and PFS rates for oligometastases, oligoprogression and DAP were 95.8%, 63.6% and 38.1% (p = 0.0039) as well as 56.5%, 27.3% and 19.1% (p = 0.0004), respectively. On MVA, treatment indication and histology were predictive for OS, while indication and prior systemic therapy were predictive for PFS. Cumulative late grade 3 + toxicity rate was 11.3%, without grade 5 events. CONCLUSION: The use of SBRT for metastatic disease to the HN provided excellent LC rates with low rates of regional failure and an acceptable toxicity profile, highlighting its utility in these patients. Patients with oligometastatic disease had better OS and PFS than others.

Overview of Radiation Therapy in the Management of Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal is to describe the evolution of radiation therapy (RT) utilization in the management of localized and metastatic prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Long term data for a variety of hypofractionated definitive RT dose-fractionation schemes has matured, allowing patients and providers many standard-of-care options to choose from. Post-prostatectomy, adjuvant RT has largely been replaced by an early salvage approach. Multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET have enabled increasingly targeted RT delivery to the prostate and oligometastatic tumors. Areas of active investigation include determining the value of proton beam therapy and perirectal spacers, and optimally incorporate genomic tumor profiling and next generation hormonal therapies with RT in the curative setting. The use of radiation therapy to treat prostate cancer is rapidly evolving. In the coming years, there will be continued improvements in a variety of areas to enhance the value of RT in multidisciplinary prostate cancer management.

The impact of margin reduction on radiation dose distribution of ultra-hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy utilizing a 1.5-T MR-Linac.

BACKGROUND: We examined the effects of reducing the planning target volume (PTV) margin in MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) on the distribution of radiation dose to target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs). Thus, we compared MR-Linac (MRL) plans with and without reduced margin and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan with conventional linac for low-risk prostate cancer patients receiving 36.25 Gy in five fractions of ultra-hypofractionated radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty low-risk prostate cancer patients treated with 1.5 T MR-Linac were evaluated. The same planning CT images were used for four plans: the MRL-R plan with reduced margin planning target volume (PTV-R) and the MRL-N plan with normal margin PTV (PTV-N), which is also used for IMRT plan. In four plans, PTV doses, organs-at-risk (OARs) doses, the homogeneity index (HI), and monitor units were compared. RESULTS: All plans met the criteria for PTV coverage and OARs dose constraints. The maximum and mean PTV doses were significantly higher in the MRL-R and MRL-N plans compared to the IMRT plan. The HI was lowest in the IMRT plan (0.040 ± 0.013) and highest in the MRL-N plan (0.055 ± 0.012; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the PTV dosimetric parameters between the MRL-R and the MRL-N plans. The high doses in the rectum was significantly lower in the MRL-R compared to other plans. The bladder V36.25 Gy was significantly lower in the MRL-R plan (2.43 ± 1.87 Gy) compared to MRL-N (4.50 ± 2.42 Gy; p < 0.001), and IMRT plans (4.76 ± 2.77 Gy; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the low-dose volumes of the body, maximum femur doses, or monitor units across each plan. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-hypofractionated MR-guided RT with 1.5 T MRL is dosimetrically feasible for patients with prostate cancer. The improved soft tissue contrast and the online adaptive plan for 1.5 T MR-Linac allows for PTV margin reduction resulted in a significant dose reduction in OARs.

Evaluating intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath-hold.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), and to investigate the adequacy of the current planning target volume (PTV) margins. METHODS: Twenty-eight lung SBRT patients with DIBH were selected in this study. Among the lesions, twenty-three were at right or left lower lobe, two at right middle lobe, and three at right or left upper lobe. Post-treatment gated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was acquired to quantify the intra-fractional tumor shift at each treatment. These obtained shifts were then used to calculate the required PTV margin, which was compared with the current applied margin of 5 mm margin in anterior-posterior (AP) and right-left (RL) directions and 8 mm in superior-inferior (SI) direction. The beam delivery time was prolonged with DIBH. The actual beam delivery time with DIBH (Tbeam_DIBH) was compared with the beam delivery time without DIBH (Tbeam_wo_DIBH) for the corresponding SBRT plan. RESULTS: A total of 113 treatments were analyzed. At six treatments (5.3%), the shifts exceeded the tolerance defined by the current PTV margin. The average shifts were 0.0 ± 1.9 mm, 0.1±1.5 mm, and -0.5 ± 3.7 mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The required PTV margins were determined to be 4.5, 3.9, and 7.4 mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The average Tbeam_wo_DIBH and Tbeam_DIBH were 2.4 ± 0.4 min and 3.6 ± 1.5 min, respectively. The average treatment slot for lung SBRT with DIBH was 25.3 ± 7.9 min. CONCLUSION: Intra-fractional tumor motion is the predominant source of treatment uncertainties in CBCT-guided lung SBRT with DIBH. The required PTV margin should be determined based on data specific to each institute, considering different techniques and populations. Our data indicate that our current applied PTV margin is adequate, and it is possible to reduce further in the RL direction. The time increase of Tbeam_DIBH, relative to the treatment slot, is not clinically significant.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in pancreatic cancer allows high delivery of radiation doses on tumors without affecting surrounding tissue. This review aimed at the SBRT application in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. DATA SOURCES: We retrieved articles published in MEDLINE/PubMed from January 2017 to December 2022. Keywords used in the search included: "pancreatic adenocarcinoma" OR "pancreatic cancer" AND "stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)" OR "stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)" OR "chemoradiotherapy (CRT)". English language articles with information on technical characteristics, doses and fractionation, indications, recurrence patterns, local control and toxicities of SBRT in pancreatic tumors were included. All articles were assessed for validity and relevant content. RESULTS: Optimal doses and fractionation have not yet been defined. However, SBRT could be the standard treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in addition to CRT. Furthermore, the combination of SBRT with chemotherapy may have additive or synergic effect on pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is an effective modality for patients with pancreatic cancer, supported by clinical practice guidelines as it has demonstrated good tolerance and good disease control. SBRT opens a possibility of improving outcomes for these patients, both in neoadjuvant treatment and with radical intent.

Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-Intensity Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Ultra-Central Lung Tumor.

Background and Objectives: Ultra-central (UC) lung tumors are defined as those abutting the proximal bronchial tree. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for UC tumors is difficult because of concerns about severe toxicities. Therefore, we report the safety and efficacy of moderate-intensity SBRT for UC tumors at our institution. Materials and Methods: From January 2017 to May 2021, we treated 20 patients with UC tumors with SBRT at a dose of 45-60 Gy in 10 fractions. The primary endpoints were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). Results: The median follow-up time was 15.8 months (range: 2.7-53.8 months). Ten of the 20 patients (50.0%) showed a complete response, five (25.0%) had a partial response, two (10.0%) had stable disease, and three (15.0%) showed progressive disease (PD). The response and disease control rates were 75.0% and 85.0%, respectively. Patients with PD showed local progression at median 8.3 months (range: 6.8-19.1 months) after SBRT. One-year and 2-year OS rates were 79.4% and 62.4%, respectively. One-year and 2-year LC rates are 87.1% and 76.2%, respectively. Eight patients died due to a non-radiation therapy related cause. One patient experienced grade 5 massive hemoptysis 6 months after SBRT, resulting in death. One patient experienced grade 2 esophageal pain and two experienced grade 2 radiation pneumonitis. Otherwise, no grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported. Conclusions: Moderate-intensity SBRT offers effective control of UC tumors and is a well-tolerated treatment for such tumors.

[Stereotactic radiation therapy for liver tumours]. / Radiothérapie stéréotaxique hépatique.

Liver lesions are common in oncology, and various focal treatments can be used, such as surgery, chemoembolization, radiofrequency, and systemic treatment. However, these treatments are often not feasible for a number of reasons, including the patient's general health or the characteristics of the lesion itself. Additionally, localized relapses may occur after focal treatments. In the past, liver radiotherapy was limited by the toxicities it caused and was mainly used in palliative situations or specific pre-transplant management. However, advancements in high-precision radiotherapy, like hypofractionated radiotherapy in stereotactic conditions, have allowed to treat the lesions with minimal margins, delivering higher doses while reducing the healthy liver's exposure. Increasingly, retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of hypofractionation for both primary and secondary liver lesions. This review discusses the indications, results, and techniques of this type of treatment.

Les lésions hépatiques primitives ou secondaires sont une situation fréquente en oncologie. Plusieurs types de traitements focaux peuvent être appliqués : chirurgie, chimio-embolisation, radio-fréquence, traitement systémique. Néanmoins, les traitements focaux sont régulièrement contre-indiqués, soit par l'état général et les antécédents du patient, soit par la lésion en elle-même (volume, situation). De plus, il peut y avoir des patients qui présentent des rechutes localisées après ce type de prise en charge. Le foie est un organe très radiosensible, et la radiothérapie hépatique a longtemps été limitée par les toxicités qu'elle engendrait. La radiothérapie est le plus souvent utilisée dans les situations très palliatives (irradiation hépatique en totalité) ou dans certains schémas de prise en charge avant greffe. Pourtant, l'avènement de la radiothérapie de haute précision, telle que la radiothérapie hypofractionnée en condition stéréotaxique, permet de traiter les lésions avec des marges minimes et donc, d'augmenter la dose délivrée en diminuant le volume de foie sain irradié. On retrouve aujourd'hui un nombre de plus en plus important de séries rétrospectives et prospectives qui décrivent son efficacité et sa tolérance tant pour les lésions primitives que secondaires. Nous faisons ici un point sur les indications, les résultats et les modalités de ce type de traitement.

Efficacy and Dose-Response Relationship of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Abdominal Lymph Node Metastases from Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the treatment efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and evaluate the influence of radiation dose on local control and survival in patients with abdominal lymph node metastases (LNM) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, data of 148 patients with HCC with abdominal LNM, including 114 who underwent SBRT and 34 who received conventional fractionation radiation therapy (CFRT), were collected. A total radiation dose of 28-60 Gy was delivered in 3-30 fractions, with a median biologic effective dose (BED) of 60 Gy (range, 39-105 Gy). Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 13.6 months (range, 0.4-96.0 months), the 2-year FFLP and OS rates of the entire cohort were 70.6% and 49.7%, respectively. Median OS of the SBRT group was longer than the CFRT group (29.7 vs. 9.9 months, P = .007). A dose-response relationship was observed between local control and BED in either the entire cohort or the SBRT subgroup. Patients who received SBRT with a BED ≥60 Gy had significantly higher 2-year FFLP and OS rates than those who received a BED <60 Gy (80.1% vs. 63.4%, P = .004; 68.3% vs. 33.0%, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, BED was an independent prognostic factor for both FFLP and OS. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT achieved satisfactory local control and survival with feasible toxicities in patients with HCC with abdominal LNM. Moreover, the findings of this large series suggest a dose-response relationship between local control and BED.

Surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization followed by moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the gold standard treatment in intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but long-term disease control rates remain low. Herein, we compared results of TACE followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy (TACE-hRT) to surgical resection (SR) in early single or paucinodular intrahepatic HCC. METHODS: Between June 2004 and November 2016, data on 160 consecutive patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A Child-Pugh A HCC treated with SR or TACE-hRT in our expert center were retrospectively reviewed. Time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared using the stabilized-weights inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients underwent SR and 62 were treated by TACE-hRT. Median total dose of RT was 54 Gy (interquartile range [IQR] 54-54) in 3­Gy fractions. Median OS follow-up was 93 months. TTP did not significantly differ between patients following SR and TACE-hRT, with 1­year rates of 68.2% and 82.6% (p = 0.17), respectively. In contrast, PFS and OS were lower in the TACE-hRT group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.006), with a median OS of 37 vs. 63 months for patients with surgery and TACE-hRT, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a significant negative impact on PFS and OS was seen for age at diagnosis, on TTP for alcohol-related liver disease, and on OS for total number of HCC nodules. Symptomatic grade ≥ 3 adverse events were presented by 42 (42.9%) SR and 19 (30.6%) TACE-hRT patients (p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting Child-Pugh A BCLC­A HCC with high risk for surgical complications, TACE-hRT can be an effective and safe treatment. However, surgical management remains the standard of care whenever possible.

Linac-based stereotactic salvage reirradiation for intraprostatic prostate cancer recurrence: toxicity and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The rates of local failure after curative radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PC) remain high despite more accurate locoregional treatments available, with one third of patients experiencing biochemical failure and clinical relapse occurring in 30-47% of cases. Today, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the treatment of choice in this setting, but with not negligible toxicity and low effects on local disease. Therefore, the treatment of intraprostatic PC recurrence represents a challenge for radiation oncologists. Prostate reirradiation (Re-I) might be a therapeutic possibility. We present our series of patients treated with salvage stereotactic Re­I for intraprostatic recurrence of PC after radical radiotherapy, with the aim of evaluating feasibility and safety of linac-based prostate Re­I. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated toxicities and outcomes of patients who underwent salvage reirradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for intraprostatic PC recurrence. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, histologically proven diagnosis of PC, salvage Re­I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary radiotherapy for PC with curative intent, concurrent/adjuvant ADT with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allowed, performance status ECOG 0-2, restaging choline/PSMA-PET/TC and prostate MRI after biochemical recurrence, and signed informed consent. RESULTS: From January 2019 to April 2022, 20 patients were recruited. Median follow-up was 26.7 months (range 7-50). After SBRT, no patients were lost at follow-up and all are still alive. One- and 2­year progression free survival (PFS) was 100% and 81.5%, respectively, while 2­year biochemical progression-free survival (bFFS) was 88.9%. Four patients (20%) experienced locoregional lymph node progression and were treated with a further course of SBRT. Prostate reirradiation allowed the ADT start to be postponed for 12-39 months. Re­I was well tolerated by all patients and none discontinued the treatment. No cases of ≥ G3 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were reported. Seven (35%) and 2 (10%) patients experienced acute G1 and G2 GU toxicity, respectively. Late GU toxicity was recorded in 10 (50%) patients, including 8 (40%) G1 and 2 (10%) G2. ADT-related side effects were found in 7 patients (hot flashes and asthenia). CONCLUSION: Linac-based SBRT is a safe technique for performing Re­I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary curative radiotherapy for PC. Future prospective, randomized studies are desirable to better understand the effectiveness of reirradiation and the still open questions in this field.