Comparison of the efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty with different pedicle approaches for osteoporotic vertebral.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty through different pedicle approaches in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) by network meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science. Database for literature retrieval, retrieval time from the establishment of the database to April 2023, the randomized controlled trials of unilateral vertebroplasty (UVP), bilateral vertebroplasty (BVP), unilateral kyphoplasty (UKP), bilateral kyphoplasty (BKP), curved vertebroplasty (CVP) and curved kyphoplasty (CKP) were screened, evaluated and the data were extracted and included in the analysis. STATA 15.0 and ReMan 5.3 were used for data analysis. This study was registered in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) with the registration number CRD42023405181. RESULTS: This study included 16 articles with a total of 1712 patients. The order of visual analogue scale (VAS) improvement from good to bad is CVP > BVP > UVP > CKP > BKP > UKP. The order of kyphotic angles improvement from good to bad is CKP > UKP > UKP > UVP > BVP > CVP. The order of bone cement injection from less to more is UVP > CVP > UKP > CKP > BVP > BKP. The order of bone cement leakage rate from less to more is CKP > CVP > UKP > BKP > UVP > BVP. The order of X-ray exposure time from less to more is CKP > CVP > UVP > BVP > UKP > BKP. The order of operation time from less to more is CVP > UVP > UKP > CKP > BVP > BKP. CONCLUSION: For patients with kyphotic angles, kyphoplasty has unique advantages in improving kyphotic angles. But generally speaking, curved approach can optimize the distribution of bone cement through unilateral approach to achieve the orthopedic effect of bilateral approach, which is a minimally invasive technique with better curative effect and higher safety in the treatment of OVCF.

Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes, operation times, restoration rate, dosage of polymethylmeth-acrylate (PMMA) injected, complications and X-rays exposure frequency between unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasty approaches for the treatment of OVCF. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomized or non-randomized controlled trials published up to April 2015 that compared the unilateral and bilateral PKP for the treatment of OVCF were acquired by a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, OVID. Exclusion criteria were patients with neoplastic etiology (metastasis or myeloma), infection, neural compression syndrome, invasive and degenerative disease, traumatic fracture, re-operation, neurological deficits, significant scoliosis and spinal stenosis. The main end points included: operation times, the short- and long-term postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, the short-term postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), restoration rate, dosage of PMMA injected, cement leakage, X-ray exposure frequency and postoperative adjacent-level fractures. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies involving 428 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean operative time was shorter in the unilateral groups compared with the bilateral groups [P < 0.05, weighted mean difference (WMD) -19.74 (-30.56, -8.92)]. There was no significant difference in the short-term postoperative VAS scores [P > 0.05, WMD 0.03 (-0.34, 0.40)], the long-term postoperative VAS scores between them [P > 0.05, WMD 0.01 (-0.42, 0.45)] and the short-term postoperative ODI [P > 0.05, WMD -0.33 (-2.36, 1.69)] between the two groups. The unilateral approaches required significantly less dosage of PMMA than the bipedicular approaches did [P < 0.05, WMD -1.56 (-1.59, -1.16)]. The restoration rate in the bilateral groups was higher than the unilateral groups [P < 0.05, WMD -7.82 (-12.23, -3.41)]. There was no significant difference in the risk ratio of cement leakage [P > 0.05, RR 0.86 (0.36, 2.06)] and postoperative adjacent-level fractures [P > 0.05, RR 0.91 (0.25, 3.26)] between the two methods. The mean X-ray exposure frequency in the unilateral groups was greater than the bilateral groups [P < 0.05, WMD -5.69 (-10.67, -0.70)]. CONCLUSIONS: A definitive verdict could not be reached regarding which approach is better for the treatment of OVCF. Although unilateral PKP was associated with shorter operative time, less X- ray exposure frequency and dosage of PMMA than bilateral PKP. There was no apparent difference in the short- and long-term clinical outcomes and complications between them. However, bilateral PKP approaches were higher than unilateral PKP in term of the restoration rate. But on account of lack of some high-quality evidence, we hold that amounts of high-quality randomized controlled trials should be required and more complications should be analysed to resolve which surgical approach is better for the treatment of OVCF in the future.

Comparison of unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures associated with scoliosis.

To assess the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) associated with scoliosis, 52 patients with OVCF associated with scoliosis who underwent PKP were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into the unilateral PKP group (n=26) and the bilateral PKP group (n=26). The operation time, bone cement injection volume and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy were recorded and compared between the groups. Additionally, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, as well as postoperative complications, including bone cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures, were also assessed. The operation time, bone cement injection volume and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency were significantly lower in the unilateral compared with the bilateral group (P<0.001). The VAS score, ODI score, average vertebral body height and kyphotic angle (KA) were improved after surgery in each group with no difference in these clinical parameters between the two groups both before and after surgery. Furthermore, the proportion of cases with bone cement leakage in the unilateral group was significantly lower compared with that in the bilateral group (P<0.05). During the follow-up, there were three cases (11.5%) in the unilateral group and two cases (7.7%) in the bilateral group who suffered adjacent vertebral fractures, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). For treating patients with OVCF accompanied by scoliosis, both unilateral and bilateral PKP could effectively relieve the acute back pain and correct the KA. However, unilateral PKP presents more advantages, such as a short operation duration and reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency and bone cement leakage.