Association between results of an amyloid PET scan and healthcare utilization in individuals with cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: The Imaging Dementia Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) study reports that amyloid PET scans help providers diagnose and manage Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Using CARE-IDEAS, an IDEAS supplemental study, we examined the association between amyloid PET scan result (elevated or non-elevated amyloid), patient characteristics, and participant healthcare utilization. METHODS: We linked respondents in CARE-IDEAS study to their Medicare fee-for-service records (n = 1333). We examined participants' cognitive impairment-related, outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient encounters in the year before compared with the 2 years after the amyloid PET scan. RESULTS: Individuals with a non-elevated amyloid scan had more healthcare encounters throughout the overall study period than those with an elevated amyloid scan. Regardless of the amyloid scan result, cognitive impairment-related and outpatient encounters overall decreased, but ED and inpatient encounters increased in the 2 years after the scan compared with the year prior. There was minimal evidence of differences in healthcare utilization between participants with an elevated and non-elevated amyloid scan. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in change in healthcare utilization between people with scans showing elevated and non-elevated beta-amyloid.

Continuity of care (COC) and amyloid-ß PET scan: the CARE-IDEAS study.

BACKGROUND: High continuity of care (COC) is associated with better clinical outcomes among older adults. The impact of amyloid-ß PET scan on COC among adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia of uncertain etiology is unknown. METHODS: We linked data from the CARE-IDEAS study, which assessed the impact of amyloid-ß PET scans on outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia of uncertain etiology and their care partners, to Medicare claims (2015-2018). We calculated a participant-level COC index using the Bice-Boxerman formula and claims from all ambulatory evaluation and management visits during the year prior to and following the amyloid-ß PET scan. We compared baseline characteristics by scan result (elevated or non-elevated) using standardized differences. To evaluate changes in COC, we used multiple regression models adjusting for sociodemographics, cognitive function, general health status, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Among the 1171 cohort members included in our analytic population, the mean age (SD) was 75.2 (5.4) years, 61.5% were male and 93.9% were non-Hispanic white. Over two-thirds (68.1%) had an elevated amyloid-ß PET scan. Mean COC for all patients was 0.154 (SD = 0.102; range = 0-0.73) prior to the scan and 0.158 (SD = 0.105; range = 0-1.0) in the year following the scan. Following the scan, the mean COC index score increased (95% CI) by 0.005 (-0.008, 0.019) points more for elevated relative to not elevated scan recipients, but this change was not statistically significant. There was no association between scan result (elevated vs. not elevated) or any other patient covariates and changes in COC score after the scan. CONCLUSION: COC did not meaningfully change following receipt of amyloid-ß PET scan in a population of Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia of uncertain etiology. Future work examining how care continuity varies across marginalized populations with cognitive impairment is needed.

"Now at least we have something to call it": Patient and care partner experiences receiving an amyloid PET scan.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this paper was to examine perspectives and experiences of individuals with cognitive impairment who received an amyloid PET scan and their care partners, with regard to the process, logistics, and decision-making associated with receiving an amyloid PET scan and its results. METHODS: Structured telephone interviews were conducted with 200 randomly sampled scan recipient/care partner dyads from the CARE IDEAS study. The audio-recorded, transcribed responses were analyzed using an inductive qualitative content analytic approach. RESULTS: Participating individuals and care partners described their experiences in seeking a diagnosis for memory issues, including decision-making and logistics involved with receiving an amyloid PET scan. Participants discussed the factors contributing to their decision to seek a diagnosis for their memory issues and their hopes and expectations in completing the scan. Participants also described the trajectory of this process, and although some described relatively straightforward trajectories, others described problems associated with identifying appropriate providers and coordinating care across numerous providers to obtain a diagnosis for their memory issues. Participants described an additional challenge of physicians attributing cognitive decline to normal aging, rather than signs of a neurodegenerative disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Findings shed light on the barriers and delays that individuals and care partners experience in connecting with physicians and obtaining a comprehensive evaluation for cognitive problems. Results from this study have implications for physicians who provide care to older adults, and specifically highlight the need for greater care coordination and clearer communication with and systems of referral for patients.

From information to follow-up: Ethical recommendations to facilitate the disclosure of amyloid PET scan results in a research setting.

In the field of Alzheimer's disease research, the use of biomarkers such as amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) has become widespread over a relatively brief period of time. There is an increasing tendency in research studies and trials to switch from no disclosure under any condition toward a qualified disclosure of individual research results, such as amyloid PET scan results. This perspective article aims to evaluate the possible need for a modification of the available recommendations on amyloid PET scan disclosure, based on recent empirical evidence obtained within the field of amyloid PET. This article also applies the International Guideline for Good Clinical Practice to the field of amyloid PET disclosure. Hence, we propose several recommendations to facilitate amyloid PET disclosure while minimizing possible risks of amyloid disclosure in a research context.