Anesthetic Care of the Pregnant Patient With Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

The pregnancy-related mortality rate in the United States is excessively high. The American Heart Association is dedicated to fighting heart disease and recognizes that cardiovascular disease, preexisting or acquired during pregnancy, is the leading cause of maternal mortality in the United States. Comprehensive scientific statements from cardiology and obstetrics experts guide the treatment of cardio-obstetric patients before, during, and after pregnancy. This scientific statement aims to highlight the role of specialized cardio-obstetric anesthesiology care, presenting a systematic approach to the care of these patients from the anesthesiology perspective. The anesthesiologist is a critical part of the pregnancy heart team as the perioperative physician who is trained to prevent or promptly recognize and treat patients with peripartum cardiovascular decompensation. Maternal morbidity is attenuated with expert anesthesiology peripartum care, which includes the management of neuraxial anesthesia, inotrope and vasopressor support, transthoracic echocardiography, optimization of delivery location, and consideration of advanced critical care and mechanical support when needed. Standardizing the anesthesiology approach to patients with high peripartum cardiovascular risk and ensuring that cardio-obstetrics patients have access to the appropriate care team, facilities, and advanced cardiovascular therapies will contribute to improving peripartum morbidity and mortality.

Exploring Anesthesiology Management of Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Survey From the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society for Transplantation Anesthesiologists.

INTRODUCTION: While living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) serves as the predominant method of adult liver transplant (LT) in the Republic of Korea (ROK), it represents a minority of LT in the United States (US). A survey was conducted to gain insight into these nations' anesthetic management. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was distributed to directors of LT anesthesiology overseeing LDLT programs in both countries between May 2021 and October 2021. RESULTS: The response rate was 93.0% (100% [37/37] in the US and 80% [16/20] in the ROK). Both countries mainly adhered to deceased donor LT recipient management practices, including the frequency of routine pulmonary artery catheter use, transesophageal echocardiography, and point-of-care coagulation monitoring. Differences were observed in early extubation of recipients (US vs. ROK: 39.7% vs. 14.7% of all cases), participation in donor selection meetings (88.9% [32/36] vs. 6.3% [1/16], p < 0.0001), application of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery donor protocol (69.4% [25/36] vs. 12.5% [2/16], p < 0.0001), and cell saver usage for donors (94.4% [34/36] vs. 18.8% [3/16], p < 0.0001). More ROK programs implemented simultaneous donor/recipient anesthesia supervision by a single anesthesiologist. CONCLUSIONS: Several important differences were identified between the US and the ROK in adult LDLT anesthetic management.

Anaesthesiologic Considerations for Intraoperative ECMO Anticoagulation During Lung Transplantation: A Single-Centre, Retrospective, Observational Study.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is frequently used during lung transplantation. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is mainly used as part of ECMO support for anticoagulation. One of the most common perioperative complications is bleeding, which high-dose UFH can aggravate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed (n = 141) patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2020 and 2022. All subjects (n = 109) underwent central cannulated VA ECMO with successful intraoperative ECMO weaning. Patients on ECMO bridge, postoperative ECMO, heart-lung transplants and transplants without ECMO were excluded. The dose of UFH for the entire surgical procedure, blood loss and consumption of blood derivatives intraoperatively and 48 h after ICU admission were recorded. Surgical revision for postoperative bleeding were analyzed. Thrombotic complications, mortality and long-term survival were evaluated. Results: Lower doses of UFH administered for intraoperative ECMO anticoagulation contribute to a reduction in intraoperative blood derivates consumption and blood loss with no thrombotic complications related to the patient or the ECMO circuit. Lower doses of UFH may lead to a decreased incidence of surgical revision for hemothorax. Conclusion: Lower doses of UFH as part of intraoperative ECMO anticoagulation might reduce the incidence of complications and lead to better postoperative outcomes.

Assessment of fluid responsiveness using pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, plethysmographic variability index, central venous pressure, and inferior vena cava variation in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Maneuvers assessing fluid responsiveness before an intravascular volume expansion may limit useless fluid administration, which in turn may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To describe maneuvers for assessing fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO: CRD42019146781. INFORMATION SOURCES AND SEARCH: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were search from inception to 08/08/2023. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA COLLECTION: Prospective and intervention studies were selected. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data for each maneuver were reported individually and data from the five most employed maneuvers were aggregated. A traditional and a Bayesian meta-analysis approach were performed. RESULTS: A total of 69 studies, encompassing 3185 fluid challenges and 2711 patients were analyzed. The prevalence of fluid responsiveness was 49.9%. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) was studied in 40 studies, mean threshold with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) = 11.5 (10.5-12.4)%, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) with 95% CI was 0.87 (0.84-0.90). Stroke volume variation (SVV) was studied in 24 studies, mean threshold with 95% CI = 12.1 (10.9-13.3)%, and AUC with 95% CI was 0.87 (0.84-0.91). The plethysmographic variability index (PVI) was studied in 17 studies, mean threshold = 13.8 (12.3-15.3)%, and AUC was 0.88 (0.82-0.94). Central venous pressure (CVP) was studied in 12 studies, mean threshold with 95% CI = 9.0 (7.7-10.1) mmHg, and AUC with 95% CI was 0.77 (0.69-0.87). Inferior vena cava variation (∆IVC) was studied in 8 studies, mean threshold = 15.4 (13.3-17.6)%, and AUC with 95% CI was 0.83 (0.78-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Fluid responsiveness can be reliably assessed in adult patients under mechanical ventilation. Among the five maneuvers compared in predicting fluid responsiveness, PPV, SVV, and PVI were superior to CVP and ∆IVC. However, there is no data supporting any of the above mentioned as being the best maneuver. Additionally, other well-established tests, such as the passive leg raising test, end-expiratory occlusion test, and tidal volume challenge, are also reliable.

Continuing professional development (CPD) for anesthetists: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In accordance with the focus on patient safety and quality in healthcare, continuing professional development (CPD) has received increasing levels of attention as a means to ensure physicians maintain their clinical competencies and are fit to practice. There is some evidence of a beneficial effect of CPD, though few studies have evaluated its effect within anesthesia. The primary aim of this systematic review was to establish which CPD activities anesthetists are engaged in and their effectiveness. The secondary aim was to explore which methods are employed to evaluate anesthetists' clinical performance. METHODS: Databases searched: Medline, Embase and Web of Science, in May 2023. Additional papers were identified through searching the references of included studies. Eligible studies included anesthetists, either exclusively or combined with other healthcare professionals, who underwent a learning activity or assessment method as part of a formalized CPD program or a stand-alone activity. Non-English language studies, non-peer reviewed studies and studies published prior to 2000 were excluded. Eligible studies were quality assessed and narratively synthesized, with results presented as descriptive summaries. RESULTS: A total of 2112 studies were identified, of which 63 were eligible for inclusion, encompassing more than 137,518 participants. Studies were primarily of quantitative design and medium quality. Forty-one studies reported outcomes of single learning activities, whilst 12 studies investigated different roles of assessment methods in CPD and ten studies evaluated CPD programs or combined CPD activities. A 36 of the 41 studies reported positive effects of single learning activities. Investigations of assessment methods revealed evidence of inadequate performance amongst anesthetists and a mixed effect of feedback. Positive attitudes and high levels of engagement were identified for CPD programs, with some evidence of a positive impact on patient/organizational outcomes. DISCUSSION: Anesthetists are engaged in a variety of CPD activities, with evidence of high levels of satisfaction and a positive learning effect. However, the impact on clinical practice and patient outcomes remains unclear and the role of assessment is less well-defined. There is a need for further, high-quality studies, evaluating a broader range of outcomes, in order to identify which methods are most effective to train and assess specialists in anesthesia.

Ultrasound in anesthesiology in the Nordic countries-Protocol of an international survey on availability, frequency of use, operator training, and certification.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, ultrasound utilization has increased within anesthesia and intensive care medicine, enhancing patient safety and diagnostic accuracy. However, the frequency of ultrasound usage and operator training in the Nordic countries remain unclear. This project aims to perform a survey on ultrasound availability, daily clinical use, and how ultrasound skills are trained and assessed, among anesthesiologists. METHODS: This online cross-sectional survey will include anesthesiologists from the Nordic countries. The survey will adhere to the CROSS checklist. Survey items will be developed based on a formative model with a conceptual model, consisting of three main parts, including demographics, ultrasound machines and use, and skills development and assessment. The clinical relevance of items will be secured by including anesthesiologists of various levels of experience in the development of the survey. Furthermore, experienced researchers in medical education will participate in the development, contributing with relevant medical educational perspectives. Data will be summarized using a non-parametric descriptive approach. A chi-squared test will examine relevant relationships between certain answers. RESULTS: Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant scientific conferences and meetings. CONCLUSION: This study may find a high availability of ultrasound machines and frequent use in the clinical departments. Despite this expected daily use of ultrasound, missing standardized structured skills acquisition and assessment could be uncovered. The results of this study may contribute to mapping various aspects of clinical ultrasound and skills development for further use in research.

Neuraxial Anesthesia and Analgesia During Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to synthesize and examine the literature on the use of neuraxial anesthesia and analgesia during cardiothoracic surgery. As cardiothoracic procedures often require systemic anticoagulation, neuraxial techniques are quite often underutilized due to the theoretical risk of epidural hematoma. In this review, we seek to examine the literature to review the indications and contraindications and to explore if neuraxial anesthesia and analgesia has a role in cardiothoracic surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Neuraxial techniques have multiple advantages during cardiothoracic surgery including coronary vasodilation, decreased sympathetic surge, and a decreased cortisol level leading to overall reduction in stress response. Multiple studies have shown an improvement in pain scores, reduction in pulmonary complications, faster extubation times, with minimal complications when neuraxial techniques are utilized in cardiothoracic surgeries. Given the numerous advantages and minimal complications of neuraxial techniques in cardiothoracic surgeries, we hope its utilization continues to increase. Moving forward, we hope additional studies continue to reaffirm the benefits of neuraxial anesthesia and analgesia for cardiothoracic surgeries to improve its utilization.

Exploring anesthesiology nurse' presenteeism in China: cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The department of anesthesiology is the main battlefield for the treatment of acute and critical patients, with high work risk and high work pressure. Due to the particularity of the working environment and nature of work, medical staff have become a group with a high incidence of occupational exhaustion and presenteeism. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current status of presenteeism among anesthesiology nurses in China and to analyze the related influencing factors. METHODS: Three hundred twelve anesthesiology nurses in Sichuan Province were surveyed by means of general data questionnaire, presenteeism scale, work-family conflict scale, perceived social support scale, occupational commitment scale and stress resistance scale from September to November 2023 by convenience sampling method. RESULTS: The total score of presenteeism was (14.67 ± 3.92), the score of work-family conflict was (45.44 ± 15.90), the score of professional commitment was (87.28 ± 14.30), and the score of perceived social support was (66.04 ± 12.78). The evaluation score of stress resistance was (73.35 ± 11.54). The results of multivariate analysis showed that age, education, mode of employment, position, overtime hours per week, work-family conflict, perceived social support and stress resistance were the factors that affected the presenteeism of anesthesiology nurses, which could explain 44.1% of the total variation. The position ( ß = 0.296, P < 0.001), overtime hours per week (h) ( ß = 0.271, P < 0.001), perceived social support ( ß = -0.279, P < 0.001) turned out as the stronger predictors of presenteeism. CONCLUSION: The presenteeism of anesthesiology nurses is at a high level and needs to be further improved. Clinical nursing managers should pay attention to the physical and mental health and special needs of anesthesiology nurses. Interventions are made according to the main influencing factors, so as to reduce the incidence of presenteeism and improve the quality and safety of surgery.

Identifying intraoperative events in a simulated laparotomy video: a multinational study of inattentional blindness among anesthesiologists.

PURPOSE: Medical errors may be occasionally explained by inattentional blindness (IB), i.e., failing to notice an event/object that is in plain sight. We aimed to determine whether age/experience, restfulness/fatigue, and previous exposure to simulation education may affect IB in the anesthetic/surgical setting. METHODS: In this multicentre/multinational study, a convenience sample of 280 anesthesiologists watched an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient undergoing laparotomy and (independently/anonymously) recorded the abnormalities they noticed. The video contained four expected/common abnormalities (hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxia, hypothermia) and two prominently displayed unexpected/rare events (patient's head movement, leaky central venous line). We analyzed the participants' ability to notice the expected/unexpected events (primary outcome) and the proportion of expected/unexpected events according to age group and prior exposure to simulation education (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Anesthesiologists across all ages noticed fewer unexpected/rare events than expected/common ones. Overall, younger anesthesiologists missed fewer common events than older participants did (P = 0.02). There was no consistent association between age and perception of unexpected/rare events (P = 0.28), although the youngest cohort (< 30 yr) outperformed the other age groups. Prior simulation education did not affect the proportion of misses for the unexpected/rare events but was associated with fewer misses for the expected/common events. Self-perceived restfulness did not impact perception of events. CONCLUSION: Anesthesiologists noticed fewer unexpected/rare clinical events than expected/common ones in an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient, in keeping with IB. Prior simulation training was associated with an improved ability to notice anticipated/expected events, but did not reduce IB. Our findings may have implications for understanding medical mishaps, and efforts to improve situational awareness, especially in acute perioperative and critical care settings.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les erreurs médicales peuvent parfois s'expliquer par la cécité d'inattention, soit le fait de ne pas remarquer un événement/objet qui est à la vue de tous et toutes. Notre objectif était de déterminer si l'âge/l'expérience, le repos/la fatigue et l'exposition antérieure à l'enseignement par simulation pouvaient affecter la cécité d'inattention dans le cadre de l'anesthésie/chirurgie. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude multicentrique/multinationale, un échantillon de convenance de 280 anesthésiologistes ont visionné une vidéo exigeant l'attention portant sur un patient de trauma simulé bénéficiant d'une laparotomie et ont enregistré (de manière indépendante/anonyme) les anomalies qu'ils et elles ont remarquées. La vidéo contenait quatre anomalies attendues/courantes (hypotension, tachycardie, hypoxie, hypothermie) et deux événements inattendus/rares bien en vue (mouvement de la tête du patient, fuite du cathéter veineux central). Nous avons analysé la capacité des participant·es à remarquer les événements attendus/inattendus (critère d'évaluation principal) et la proportion d'événements attendus/inattendus selon le groupe d'âge et l'exposition antérieure à l'enseignement par simulation (critères d'évaluation secondaires). RéSULTATS: Les anesthésiologistes de tous âges ont remarqué moins d'événements inattendus/rares que d'événements attendus/courants. Globalement, les anesthésiologistes plus jeunes ont manqué moins d'événements courants que leurs congénères plus âgé·es (P = 0,02). Il n'y avait pas d'association constante entre l'âge et la perception d'événements inattendus ou rares (P = 0,28), bien que la cohorte la plus jeune (< 30 ans) ait surpassé les autres groupes d'âge. La formation antérieure par simulation n'a pas eu d'incidence sur la proportion d'inobservation des événements inattendus ou rares, mais a été associée à moins de cécité d'inattention envers les événements attendus ou courants. Le repos perçu n'a pas eu d'impact sur la perception des événements. CONCLUSION: Les anesthésiologistes ont remarqué moins d'événements cliniques inattendus/rares que d'événements attendus/courants dans une vidéo exigeant l'attention portant sur la simulation d'un patient traumatisé, ce qui s'inscrit dans la cécité d'inattention. La formation préalable par simulation était associée à une meilleure capacité à remarquer les événements anticipés/attendus, mais ne réduisait pas la cécité d'inattention. Nos résultats peuvent avoir des implications pour la compréhension des accidents médicaux et les efforts visant à améliorer la conscience situationnelle, en particulier dans les contextes de soins périopératoires aigus et de soins intensifs.

Use of opioids and opioid alternatives during general anesthesia: a pan-Canadian survey among anesthesiologists.

PURPOSE: While there is limited patient-centred evidence (i.e., evidence that is important for patients and end-users) to inform the use of pharmacologic opioid minimization strategies (i.e., the use of opioid alternatives) for adult surgical patients requiring general anesthesia, such strategies are increasingly being adopted into practice. Our objectives were to describe anesthesiologists' beliefs regarding intraoperative opioid minimizing strategies use and utility, and to explore important clinical decision-making factors. METHODS: We conducted a pan-Canadian web-based survey of anesthesiologists that was distributed using a modified Dillman technique. Our multidisciplinary team, including a patient partners panel, participated in the process of domains and items generation, items reduction, formatting, and composition. Our sampling frames were members of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society and members of the Association des Anesthésiologistes du Québec. We used the newsletters of each organization to distribute our survey, which was available in English and French and housed on the LimeSurvey (LimeSurvey GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) platform. RESULTS: From our eligible sampling frame, 18% completed the survey (356 respondents out of 2,008 eligible participants). Most of the respondents believed that using opioid minimization strategies during general anesthesia could improve postoperative clinical outcomes, including pain control (84% agree or strongly agree, n = 344/409). Reported use of pharmacologic opioid minimization strategies was variable; however, most respondents believed that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists (ketamine), α2-adrenoceptor agonists (dexmedetomidine), corticosteroids, and intravenous lidocaine improve prostoperative clinical outcomes. The primary factors guiding decision-making regarding the use of opioid minimization strategies were postoperative acute pain intensity, the impact of acute pain on functioning, patient well-being (i.e., quality of recovery) and patient satisfaction with care. A lack of evidence was the most important barrier limiting the use of opioid minimization strategies. CONCLUSION: In our survey of Canadian anesthesiologists, several opioid minimization strategies were believed to be effective complements to general anesthesia, although there was substantial variation in their reported use. Future randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of opioid minimization strategies should prioritize patient-centred outcome measures assessment such as the quality of recovery or the impact of acute pain on functioning.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Bien qu'il existe peu de données probantes centrées sur le/la patient·e (c.-à-d. des données probantes importantes pour les patient·es et les utilisateurs et utilisatrices) pour éclairer l'utilisation de stratégies pharmacologiques de minimisation des opioïdes (c.-à-d. l'utilisation d'alternatives aux opioïdes) pour la patientèle chirurgicale adulte nécessitant une anesthésie générale, de telles stratégies sont de plus en plus adoptées par les cliniciens. Nos objectifs étaient de décrire les croyances des anesthésiologistes concernant l'utilisation et l'utilité des stratégies peropératoires de minimisation des opioïdes, et d'explorer les facteurs importants pour la prise de décision clinique. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené un sondage pancanadien en ligne auprès des anesthésiologistes, distribué à l'aide d'une technique Dillman modifiée. Notre équipe multidisciplinaire, comprenant un panel de patient·es partenaires, a participé au processus de génération de domaines et d'éléments, de réduction des éléments, de formatage et de composition. Nos bases d'échantillonnage étaient les membres de la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes et de l'Association des anesthésiologistes du Québec. Nous avons utilisé les bulletins d'information de chaque organisation pour distribuer notre sondage, disponible en anglais et en français et hébergé sur la plateforme LimeSurvey (LimeSurvey GmbH, Hambourg, Allemagne). RéSULTATS: De notre base d'échantillonnage admissible, 18 % ont répondu au sondage (356 personnes sur 2008 personnes admissibles). La plupart des répondant·es étaient d'avis que l'utilisation de stratégies de minimisation des opioïdes pendant l'anesthésie générale pourrait améliorer les issues cliniques postopératoires, notamment le contrôle de la douleur (84 % d'accord ou tout à fait d'accord, n = 344/409). L'utilisation déclarée de stratégies pharmacologiques de minimisation des opioïdes était variable; cependant, la plupart des répondant·es croyaient que les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens, l'acétaminophène, les antagonistes des récepteurs N-méthyl-D-aspartate (kétamine), les agonistes α2­adrénergiques (dexmédétomidine), les corticostéroïdes et la lidocaïne intraveineuse améliorent les issues cliniques postopératoires. Les principaux facteurs guidant la prise de décision concernant l'utilisation de stratégies de minimisation des opioïdes étaient l'intensité de la douleur aiguë postopératoire, l'impact de la douleur aiguë sur le fonctionnement, le bien-être du patient ou de la patiente (c.-à-d. la qualité du rétablissement) et la satisfaction de la patiente ou du patient à l'égard des soins. Le manque de données probantes était l'obstacle le plus important à l'utilisation des stratégies de réduction des opioïdes. CONCLUSION: Dans notre sondage auprès des anesthésiologistes au Canada, plusieurs stratégies de minimisation des opioïdes étaient considérées comme des compléments efficaces à l'anesthésie générale, bien qu'il y avait des variations importantes dans leur utilisation déclarée. Les futures essais cliniques randomisés et revues systématiques évaluant l'efficacité des stratégies de minimisation des opioïdes devraient prioriser l'évaluation d'issues orientées vers le/la patient·e, comme la qualité du rétablissement ou la mesure de l'impact de la douleur aiguë sur le fonctionnement.

The awareness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) cesarean delivery guidelines among anesthesiology and reanimation assistants in Turkey; a questionnaire study.

BACKGROUND: To reduce maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality, it is becoming increasingly important for anesthetists to understand and implement enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) cesarean delivery guidelines. Our aim was to reveal the knowledge of anesthesia assistants in Turkey about ERAS during cesarean delivery and to increase their awareness of ERAS. METHODS: This descriptive study was conducted in the city of Isparta, Turkey in 2023. The survey, which was approved by the ethics committee, was distributed to participants across Turkey via e-mail and online messages. The survey comprises of a total of 42 questions evaluating perioperative ERAS recommendations. RESULTS: Of the 404 participants in our survey, 59.9% were associated with university hospitals and 65.8% had completed three or more years of education. A total of 87.9% of the participants were familiar with ERAS; however, only 42.8% had received ERAS training. Although 93.8% of the participants' institutions performed a cesarean delivery, ERAS recommendations were only implemented at a rate of 48%. This may be due to the absence of an ERAS team, which was identified in our survey at a high rate of 66.6%. CONCLUSION: Awareness about ERAS was high among the participants, but the implementation rates of some recommendations were low. The reason for this may be the inability to form a multidisciplinary team and inadequate training of participants. For this purpose, we recommend the formation of a multidisciplinary team for ERAS protocol implementation and increased participant training opportunities.

Airway management education and retraining: an unresolved paradigm.

Simulation is a cornerstone of medical education for difficult airway management. The lack of standards regarding the frequency of retraining that would ensure the maintenance of skills and competencies over time still needs to be solved.

Comparative efficacy of intrathecal morphine and adductor canal block in the knee arthroplasty population: a retrospective multi-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Finding the balance of good postoperative analgesia while facilitiating mobility is important for a safe and satisfactory patient experience during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intrathecal morphine, adductor canal block, and their combination in optimizing pain management and postoperative recovery in TKA patients. This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data evaluated postoperative pain scores, time to mobilisation, and length of hospital stay. METHODS: 1006 consecutive patients undergoing elective TKA across two large tertiary centres were included over six years. They were divided into one of four groups according to the type of analgesia received: Group N patients received no neuraxial morphine or regional block. Group B patients received adductor canal block (ACB) only. Group M patients received intrathecal morphine (ITM) but no regional block. Group BM patients received both ACB and ITM. RESULTS: Patients who received an ACB had faster postoperative mobilization compared to those without (p < 0.001). Patients in Group BM had the lowest pain scores at rest (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 2.9) and with movement (VAS 5.3), while Group B patients experienced the highest pain scores at rest (VAS 3.7) and on movement (VAS 6.5) (p = 0.005). Patients who received ITM had the lowest opioid requirements (p < 0.001). There was no significant differences between groups in requirement for rescue pain management strategies (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ITM and ACB in patients undergoing TKA provides improved postoperative analgesia with lower postoperative opioid requirement and earlier mobilization compared with ACB or ITM alone.

Point-of-care ultrasonography in Ukraine: a survey of anesthesiologists-intensivists participating in ultrasonography courses.

PURPOSE: Despite the potential value of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in resource-limited environments, it is not widely used in low- and middle-income countries compared with high-income countries. We sought to evaluate the current POCUS practice of Ukrainian anesthesiologists who attended POCUS courses to guide future POCUS training in Ukraine. METHODS: We conducted a 25-question web-based survey. It was distributed to 255 participants of POCUS courses held in Ukraine in 2023. The survey sections described current POCUS practice, perception of POCUS value, POCUS skills self-assessment, and perceived barriers to implementing POCUS in clinical practice. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-four out of 255 course participants completed the survey, representing 214 unique respondents. Those who self-rated their skills identified themselves as either novices or beginners in areas of POCUS knowledge (118/157, 75%), image acquisition (110/158, 70%), image interpretation (117/158, 74%), and integration into clinical decision-making (105/155, 68%). Among all survey responders, 55% (118/214) reported using POCUS for vascular access procedures, 45% (97/214) for trauma assessment, and 44% (93/214) for regional anesthesia. Reported barriers to POCUS implementation included lack of ultrasound devices (101/214, 47%) and lack of trained faculty (112/214, 52%). CONCLUSION: Among anesthesiologists who participated in POCUS courses in Ukraine, the majority were in early stages of ultrasound practice. Respondents identified POCUS applications not currently practiced and evaluated barriers to POCUS use. Based upon these survey findings, we propose the following measures in Ukraine: 1) developing a standardized national POCUS curriculum; 2) increasing the number of experienced instructors of POCUS; and 3) acquiring ultrasound devices to support clinical applications of POCUS, especially in the Central, Southern, and Eastern regions.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Malgré la valeur potentielle de l'échographie ciblée (POCUS) dans les environnements à ressources limitées, cette modalité n'est pas très répandue dans les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire par rapport aux pays à revenu élevé. Nous avons cherché à évaluer la pratique actuelle des anesthésiologistes en Ukraine qui ont suivi des cours d'échographie ciblée afin d'orienter la future formation en POCUS dans ce pays. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené un sondage en ligne de 25 questions. Il a été distribué à 255 personnes ayant suivi des cours de POCUS organisés en Ukraine en 2023. Les sections de l'enquête décrivaient la pratique actuelle en échographie ciblée, la perception de sa valeur, l'auto-évaluation des compétences en POCUS et les obstacles perçus à sa mise en œuvre dans la pratique clinique. RéSULTATS: Deux cent quarante-quatre des 255 personnes ayant pris part au cours ont répondu au sondage, représentant 214 répondant·es uniques. Les personnes ayant auto-évalué leurs compétences se sont identifiées comme novices ou débutantes dans les domaines de la connaissance de l'échographie ciblée (118/157, 75 %), de l'acquisition d'images (110/158, 70 %), de l'interprétation d'images (117/158, 74 %) et de l'intégration dans la prise de décision clinique (105/155, 68 %). Parmi toutes les personnes ayant répondu à l'enquête, 55 % (118/214) ont déclaré utiliser l'échographie ciblée pour les procédures d'accès vasculaire, 45 % (97/214) pour l'évaluation des traumatismes et 44 % (93/214) pour l'anesthésie régionale. Les obstacles signalés à la mise en œuvre de l'échographie ciblée comprenaient le manque d'appareils d'échographie (101/214, 47 %) et le manque de professeur·es formé·es (112/214, 52 %). CONCLUSION: Parmi les anesthésiologistes qui ont participé aux cours d'échographie ciblée en Ukraine, la majorité en étaient aux premiers stades de la pratique de l'échographie. Les répondant·es ont identifié les applications de l'échographie ciblée qui ne sont pas actuellement pratiquées et ont évalué les obstacles à son utilisation. Sur la base des résultats de cette enquête, nous proposons les mesures suivantes en Ukraine : 1) la création d'un programme national normalisé d'échographie ciblée; 2) l'augmentation du nombre d'instructrices et instructeurs expérimenté·es en échographie ciblée; et 3) l'acquisition d'appareils d'échographie pour soutenir les applications cliniques de cette modalité, en particulier dans les régions du Centre, du Sud et de l'Est du pays.

Medical students' perspectives on and understanding of anesthesiology: a Canadian cross-sectional survey.

PURPOSE: In Canada, three out of 17 medical schools do not mandate an anesthesia rotation in their clerkship curriculum. Understanding the effects of a mandatory anesthesiology rotation is important in determining its value to the specialty and guiding decision-making for medical educators. We sought to determine whether a mandatory anesthesia rotation affected students' understanding of anesthesiology, as well as their perspectives on anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey of Canadian medical students graduating in 2021. Our survey consisted of 46 questions related to student's perspectives of anesthesiology, understanding of anesthesia, their interest in the specialty, and participant's demographics. This included 16 Likert-scale questions, 19 quiz-style questions, four free-text response questions, and seven demographics questions. The survey was hosted by SurveyMonkey® (SurveyMonkey Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA) and distributed to the participants by each individual institution. RESULTS: We collected a total of 331 responses across 13 different Canadian medical schools, representing a 17.3% response rate of students surveyed and 11.7% of all graduating medical Canadian students in 2021. A mandatory rotation in anesthesiology was associated with a more positive perspective (P = 0.01) but not understanding (P = 0.07) of the specialty. A mandatory rotation was not related to students' application to anesthesiology at a statistically significant level (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this national survey study show the benefits of including a mandatory clerkship rotation in anesthesiology, namely on increasing positive perceptions of the specialty, while also revealing avenues for future research and insights on how to further optimize a mandatory anesthesiology rotation in clerkship.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Au Canada, trois facultés de médecine sur 17 n'exigent pas de stage clinique en anesthésie dans leur programme. Il est important de comprendre les effets d'un stage obligatoire en anesthésiologie afin de déterminer sa valeur pour la spécialité et d'orienter la prise de décision en matière d'éducation médicale. Nous avons cherché à déterminer si un stage obligatoire en anesthésie affectait la compréhension de l'anesthésiologie par les étudiant·es, ainsi que leurs points de vue sur l'anesthésie. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené un sondage transversal anonyme auprès d'étudiant·es en médecine qui ont obtenu leur diplôme en 2021 au Canada. Notre sondage comportait 46 questions portant sur leur point de vue sur l'anesthésiologie, leur compréhension de l'anesthésie, leur intérêt pour la spécialité et les caractéristiques démographiques des personnes interrogées. Le sondage comprenait 16 questions sur l'échelle de Likert, 19 questions courtes de type quiz, quatre questions à réponse libre et sept questions démographiques. Le sondage était hébergé par SurveyMonkey® (SurveyMonkey Inc., San Mateo, Californie, États-Unis) et a été distribué aux participant·es par chaque institution. RéSULTATS: Nous avons recueilli un total de 331 réponses dans 13 facultés de médecine canadiennes différentes, ce qui représente un taux de réponse de 17,3 % des étudiant·es interrogé·es et de 11,7 % de tous les étudiant·es en médecine diplômé·es en 2021 au Canada. Un stage obligatoire en anesthésiologie était associé à une perspective plus positive (P = 0,01) mais pas à une meilleure compréhension (P = 0,07) de la spécialité. Un stage obligatoire n'était pas lié aux demandes d'admission en anesthésiologie à un niveau statistiquement significatif (P = 0,06). CONCLUSION: Les résultats de cette enquête nationale montrent les avantages de l'inclusion d'un stage obligatoire en anesthésiologie, notamment pour accroître les perceptions positives de la spécialité, tout en révélant des pistes de recherche futures et des idées sur la façon d'optimiser davantage un stage clinique obligatoire en anesthésiologie.

Comparison of societal guidance on perioperative management of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: implications for clinical practice and future investigations.

PURPOSE: The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) by patients undergoing surgery and procedures requiring anesthesia has become a topic of significant concern for perioperative providers because of the potential increased risk of aspiration resulting from the medication's effect of delaying gastric emptying. There is currently a lack of high-quality data regarding the safety of GLP-1 RAs in patients undergoing surgery, which has led to variations in practice. SOURCE: We performed an internet search of society-endorsed statements and guidelines related to perioperative management of GLP-1 RAs, focusing on the top 20 countries with the largest anesthesiology societies determined by membership data from the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists. We excluded articles and websites that were not in English. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Our search revealed endorsed statements from fourteen major anesthesiology, endocrinology, and gastroenterology societies. There was considerable variation between societies in the recommendations and guidance for withholding these medications before surgery, the duration of withholding, assessment of the need for avoiding deep sedation or general anesthesia, use of rapid sequence intubation, need for prolonged fasting periods and clear fluid before a nil per os period, recognition of signs and symptoms for aspiration risk, the management of glucose in the perioperative period, and the use of point-of-care ultrasound for risk assessment. CONCLUSION: Society-endorsed statements and guidelines provide varying recommendations on the perioperative management of GLP-1 RAs. The insights gained from this comparative analysis may help guide clinical practice, develop institutional practice guidelines, and direct future research efforts.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'utilisation d'agonistes des récepteurs (AR) du peptide-1 de type glucagon (GLP-1) par les personnes bénéficiant d'une intervention chirurgicale et de procédures nécessitant une anesthésie est devenue un sujet de préoccupation important pour les prestataires de soins périopératoires en raison de l'augmentation du risque potentiel d'aspiration résultant de l'effet du médicament, qui provoque un retard de la vidange gastrique. Il existe actuellement un manque de données de haute qualité concernant l'innocuité des AR GLP-1 chez les patient·es bénéficiant d'une intervention chirurgicale, ce qui a mené à des variations dans la pratique. SOURCES: Nous avons réalisé une recherche sur Internet des déclarations et lignes directrices approuvées par les sociétés médicales concernant la prise en charge périopératoire des AR GLP-1, en nous concentrant sur les 20 pays comptant les plus grandes sociétés d'anesthésiologie, déterminées par les données sur les membres de la Fédération mondiale des sociétés d'anesthésiologistes. Nous avons exclu les articles et les sites Web qui n'étaient pas en anglais. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Nos recherches ont révélé des déclarations approuvées par quatorze grandes sociétés d'anesthésiologie, d'endocrinologie et de gastro-entérologie. Il y avait des variations considérables entre les sociétés en matière de recommandations et de directives concernant l'abstention de ces médicaments avant la chirurgie, la durée de l'abstention, l'évaluation de la nécessité d'éviter la sédation profonde ou l'anesthésie générale, l'utilisation de l'intubation en séquence rapide, la nécessité de périodes de jeûne prolongées et de liquides clairs avant une période nil per os, la reconnaissance des signes et symptômes du risque d'aspiration, la prise en charge de la glycémie pendant la période périopératoire et l'utilisation de l'échographie ciblée pour l'évaluation des risques. CONCLUSION: Les déclarations et les lignes directrices approuvées par les sociétés médicales fournissent des recommandations variées sur la prise en charge périopératoire des AR GLP-1. Les connaissances acquises grâce à cette analyse comparative pourraient aider à orienter la pratique clinique, à élaborer des lignes directrices de pratique institutionnelles et à guider les efforts de recherche futurs.

PRO: Implementation Science Has Value in Anesthesiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery.

Implementation science is a nascent field that aims to study the factors that influence the effectiveness of a given clinical intervention, such as the characteristics of the individuals involved, the internal and external settings, the process of implementation, and other factors. Overall, implementation science aims to increase the extent to which an intervention is practiced, and the quality of its delivery to a patient. Although still in its infancy, the applications of implementation science in anesthesiology and cardiothoracic surgery abound. Whether used to adopt novel innovations, avoid the use of obsolete practices, or redeploy existing interventions to improve quality, implementation science holds promise in optimizing how we bring the latest in clinical science to produce tangible benefits to patients and create sustainable change.

Sustainability of the Subspecialty of Anesthesiology Critical Care: An Expert Consensus and Review of the Literature.

While considerable literature exists with respect to clinical aspects of critical care anesthesiology (CCA) practice, few publications have focused on how anesthesiology-based critical care practices are organized and the challenges associated with the administration and management of anesthesiology critical care units. Currently, numerous challenges are affecting the sustainability of CCA practice, including decreased applications to fellowship positions and decreased reimbursement for critical care work. This review describes what is known about the subspecialty of CCA and leverages the experience of administrative leaders in adult critical care anesthesiologists in the United States to describe potential solutions.

Medical Malpractice Claims Related to Performance of Transesophageal Echocardiography by Anesthesiologists.

More than 300,000 adults have cardiac surgery in the United States annually, and most undergo intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). This patient population is often older with multiple comorbidities, increasing their risk for complications for even routine procedures. Major morbidity or mortality caused by TEE is rare, and it is unknown how often such complications lead to malpractice lawsuits. The authors identified 13 cases out of 2,564 in a closed claims database that involved TEE and reviewed their etiology. Esophageal injury accounted for most of the suits, and only 2 were related to diagnosis. Most expert reviews deemed the care provided by the anesthesiologist to be appropriate.

Continuous Right Ventricular Pressure Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in cardiac surgery can lead to RV failure, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Abnormal RV function can be identified using RV pressure monitoring. The primary objective of the study is to determine the proportion of patients with abnormal RV early to end-diastole diastolic pressure gradient (RVDPG) and abnormal RV end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) before initiation and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) separation. The secondary objective is to evaluate if RVDPG before CPB initiation is associated with difficult and complex separation from CPB, RV dysfunction, and failure at the end of cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care cardiac institute. PARTICIPANTS: Cardiac surgical patients. INTERVENTION: Cardiac surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Automated electronic quantification of RVDPG and RVEDP were obtained. Hemodynamic measurements were correlated with cardiac and extracardiac parameters from transesophageal echocardiography and postoperative complications. Abnormal RVDPG was present in 80% of the patients (n = 105) at baseline, with a mean RVEDP of 14.2 ± 3.9 mmHg. Patients experienced an RVDPG > 4 mmHg for a median duration of 50.2% of the intraoperative period before CPB initiation and 60.6% after CPB separation. A total of 46 (43.8%) patients had difficult/complex separation from CPB, 18 (38.3%) patients had RV dysfunction, and 8 (17%) had RV failure. Abnormal RVDPG before CPB was not associated with postoperative outcome. CONCLUSION: Elevated RVDPG and RVEDP are common in cardiac surgery. RVDPG and RVEDP before CPB initiation are not associated with RV dysfunction and failure but can be used to diagnose them.